Comparison between dose distribution from 103Pd, 131Cs, and 125I plaques in a real human eye model with different tumor size
Knowledge of the energy deposition in different eye components is a critical decision-making to the overall effectivity of ocular melanoma treatment with plaques loaded with low-energy sources. The aim of this study is using the GATE 8.2 Monte Carlo code to calculate the 3D dose distribution in a re...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Applied radiation and isotopes 2022-04, Vol.182, p.110146-110146, Article 110146 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 110146 |
---|---|
container_issue | |
container_start_page | 110146 |
container_title | Applied radiation and isotopes |
container_volume | 182 |
creator | Taherparvar, Payvand Fardi, Zeinab |
description | Knowledge of the energy deposition in different eye components is a critical decision-making to the overall effectivity of ocular melanoma treatment with plaques loaded with low-energy sources. The aim of this study is using the GATE 8.2 Monte Carlo code to calculate the 3D dose distribution in a realistic eye model. At first, we validated the GATE simulation for 125I, 103Pd, and 131Cs seeds by calculating the dose rate constant, radial dose function, and anisotropy function of the three radioactive sources. Then, a 12-mm Collaborative Ocular Melanoma Study (COMS) eye plaque was simulated in the eye phantoms to evaluate dose distribution due to low-energy gamma emitters on the three simulated medium-sized tumors. The findings of this study indicate that the estimated doses received by different eye substructures strongly depend on the source type. The results show that the type of seeds used in the plaque, as well as the size of the eye tumor, have significant effects on the dose deposition in the different structures of the eye and dose deposition uniformity. Moreover, comparing different radionuclides showed that the COMS plaque fully loaded with 103Pd presents a higher dose delivery to the tumor and a lower one to the critical structures for medium-sized tumors, while the plaque fully loaded with 131Cs produces the most uniform dose distribution in the tumor.
•Comparison between 103Pd, 131Cs, and 125I plaques using GATE in a standard eye model geometry is evaluated.•Calculation of dose in different substructures of the eye is performed.•125I plaques are the most used for ocular treatments; however, 103Pd plaques seem to be better by a dosimetric point of view. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1016/j.apradiso.2022.110146 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2630918989</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S0969804322000483</els_id><sourcerecordid>2630918989</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c1909-de94157674f51c9991133867702cba8b2ac0dbc209b44c29bce5ee1d78243b563</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFkE1r3DAQhkVpods0fyHMsYd4MyN_SbeWpR-BQHtIz0KWxkSLbbmS3ZDQH18v255zGpiZ92HmEeKKcE9Izc1xb-dkfchxL1HKPW3dqnkldqRaWWiF-FrsUDe6UFiVb8W7nI-IWCktd-LPIY6zTVt4go6XR-YJfMwMG29JoVuXsE36FEcgLH_4a6CSDvka7OSBZH0L82B_rZwhTGAhsR3gYR3tBPzEMEbPAzyG5WHj9T0nnhZY1jEmyOGZ34s3vR0yX_6rF-Lnl8_3h2_F3fevt4dPd4UjjbrwrCuq26at-pqc1pqoLFXTtihdZ1UnrUPfOYm6qyondee4ZibfKlmVXd2UF-LDmTuneLp1MWPIjofBThzXbGRToialld5Wm_OqSzHnxL2ZUxhtejKE5qTbHM1_3eak25x1b8GP5yBvj_wOnEx2gSfHPiR2i_ExvIT4C6jDixM</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2630918989</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Comparison between dose distribution from 103Pd, 131Cs, and 125I plaques in a real human eye model with different tumor size</title><source>Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals Complete</source><creator>Taherparvar, Payvand ; Fardi, Zeinab</creator><creatorcontrib>Taherparvar, Payvand ; Fardi, Zeinab</creatorcontrib><description>Knowledge of the energy deposition in different eye components is a critical decision-making to the overall effectivity of ocular melanoma treatment with plaques loaded with low-energy sources. The aim of this study is using the GATE 8.2 Monte Carlo code to calculate the 3D dose distribution in a realistic eye model. At first, we validated the GATE simulation for 125I, 103Pd, and 131Cs seeds by calculating the dose rate constant, radial dose function, and anisotropy function of the three radioactive sources. Then, a 12-mm Collaborative Ocular Melanoma Study (COMS) eye plaque was simulated in the eye phantoms to evaluate dose distribution due to low-energy gamma emitters on the three simulated medium-sized tumors. The findings of this study indicate that the estimated doses received by different eye substructures strongly depend on the source type. The results show that the type of seeds used in the plaque, as well as the size of the eye tumor, have significant effects on the dose deposition in the different structures of the eye and dose deposition uniformity. Moreover, comparing different radionuclides showed that the COMS plaque fully loaded with 103Pd presents a higher dose delivery to the tumor and a lower one to the critical structures for medium-sized tumors, while the plaque fully loaded with 131Cs produces the most uniform dose distribution in the tumor.
•Comparison between 103Pd, 131Cs, and 125I plaques using GATE in a standard eye model geometry is evaluated.•Calculation of dose in different substructures of the eye is performed.•125I plaques are the most used for ocular treatments; however, 103Pd plaques seem to be better by a dosimetric point of view.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0969-8043</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1872-9800</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.apradiso.2022.110146</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Elsevier Ltd</publisher><subject>103Pd ; 125I ; 131Cs ; Dosimetry ; Eye plaque ; Monte Carlo ; Radiosensitive organ</subject><ispartof>Applied radiation and isotopes, 2022-04, Vol.182, p.110146-110146, Article 110146</ispartof><rights>2022 Elsevier Ltd</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c1909-de94157674f51c9991133867702cba8b2ac0dbc209b44c29bce5ee1d78243b563</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c1909-de94157674f51c9991133867702cba8b2ac0dbc209b44c29bce5ee1d78243b563</cites><orcidid>0000-0001-9246-6219</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.apradiso.2022.110146$$EHTML$$P50$$Gelsevier$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,3550,27924,27925,45995</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Taherparvar, Payvand</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Fardi, Zeinab</creatorcontrib><title>Comparison between dose distribution from 103Pd, 131Cs, and 125I plaques in a real human eye model with different tumor size</title><title>Applied radiation and isotopes</title><description>Knowledge of the energy deposition in different eye components is a critical decision-making to the overall effectivity of ocular melanoma treatment with plaques loaded with low-energy sources. The aim of this study is using the GATE 8.2 Monte Carlo code to calculate the 3D dose distribution in a realistic eye model. At first, we validated the GATE simulation for 125I, 103Pd, and 131Cs seeds by calculating the dose rate constant, radial dose function, and anisotropy function of the three radioactive sources. Then, a 12-mm Collaborative Ocular Melanoma Study (COMS) eye plaque was simulated in the eye phantoms to evaluate dose distribution due to low-energy gamma emitters on the three simulated medium-sized tumors. The findings of this study indicate that the estimated doses received by different eye substructures strongly depend on the source type. The results show that the type of seeds used in the plaque, as well as the size of the eye tumor, have significant effects on the dose deposition in the different structures of the eye and dose deposition uniformity. Moreover, comparing different radionuclides showed that the COMS plaque fully loaded with 103Pd presents a higher dose delivery to the tumor and a lower one to the critical structures for medium-sized tumors, while the plaque fully loaded with 131Cs produces the most uniform dose distribution in the tumor.
•Comparison between 103Pd, 131Cs, and 125I plaques using GATE in a standard eye model geometry is evaluated.•Calculation of dose in different substructures of the eye is performed.•125I plaques are the most used for ocular treatments; however, 103Pd plaques seem to be better by a dosimetric point of view.</description><subject>103Pd</subject><subject>125I</subject><subject>131Cs</subject><subject>Dosimetry</subject><subject>Eye plaque</subject><subject>Monte Carlo</subject><subject>Radiosensitive organ</subject><issn>0969-8043</issn><issn>1872-9800</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2022</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNqFkE1r3DAQhkVpods0fyHMsYd4MyN_SbeWpR-BQHtIz0KWxkSLbbmS3ZDQH18v255zGpiZ92HmEeKKcE9Izc1xb-dkfchxL1HKPW3dqnkldqRaWWiF-FrsUDe6UFiVb8W7nI-IWCktd-LPIY6zTVt4go6XR-YJfMwMG29JoVuXsE36FEcgLH_4a6CSDvka7OSBZH0L82B_rZwhTGAhsR3gYR3tBPzEMEbPAzyG5WHj9T0nnhZY1jEmyOGZ34s3vR0yX_6rF-Lnl8_3h2_F3fevt4dPd4UjjbrwrCuq26at-pqc1pqoLFXTtihdZ1UnrUPfOYm6qyondee4ZibfKlmVXd2UF-LDmTuneLp1MWPIjofBThzXbGRToialld5Wm_OqSzHnxL2ZUxhtejKE5qTbHM1_3eak25x1b8GP5yBvj_wOnEx2gSfHPiR2i_ExvIT4C6jDixM</recordid><startdate>202204</startdate><enddate>202204</enddate><creator>Taherparvar, Payvand</creator><creator>Fardi, Zeinab</creator><general>Elsevier Ltd</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9246-6219</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>202204</creationdate><title>Comparison between dose distribution from 103Pd, 131Cs, and 125I plaques in a real human eye model with different tumor size</title><author>Taherparvar, Payvand ; Fardi, Zeinab</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c1909-de94157674f51c9991133867702cba8b2ac0dbc209b44c29bce5ee1d78243b563</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2022</creationdate><topic>103Pd</topic><topic>125I</topic><topic>131Cs</topic><topic>Dosimetry</topic><topic>Eye plaque</topic><topic>Monte Carlo</topic><topic>Radiosensitive organ</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Taherparvar, Payvand</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Fardi, Zeinab</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Applied radiation and isotopes</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Taherparvar, Payvand</au><au>Fardi, Zeinab</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Comparison between dose distribution from 103Pd, 131Cs, and 125I plaques in a real human eye model with different tumor size</atitle><jtitle>Applied radiation and isotopes</jtitle><date>2022-04</date><risdate>2022</risdate><volume>182</volume><spage>110146</spage><epage>110146</epage><pages>110146-110146</pages><artnum>110146</artnum><issn>0969-8043</issn><eissn>1872-9800</eissn><abstract>Knowledge of the energy deposition in different eye components is a critical decision-making to the overall effectivity of ocular melanoma treatment with plaques loaded with low-energy sources. The aim of this study is using the GATE 8.2 Monte Carlo code to calculate the 3D dose distribution in a realistic eye model. At first, we validated the GATE simulation for 125I, 103Pd, and 131Cs seeds by calculating the dose rate constant, radial dose function, and anisotropy function of the three radioactive sources. Then, a 12-mm Collaborative Ocular Melanoma Study (COMS) eye plaque was simulated in the eye phantoms to evaluate dose distribution due to low-energy gamma emitters on the three simulated medium-sized tumors. The findings of this study indicate that the estimated doses received by different eye substructures strongly depend on the source type. The results show that the type of seeds used in the plaque, as well as the size of the eye tumor, have significant effects on the dose deposition in the different structures of the eye and dose deposition uniformity. Moreover, comparing different radionuclides showed that the COMS plaque fully loaded with 103Pd presents a higher dose delivery to the tumor and a lower one to the critical structures for medium-sized tumors, while the plaque fully loaded with 131Cs produces the most uniform dose distribution in the tumor.
•Comparison between 103Pd, 131Cs, and 125I plaques using GATE in a standard eye model geometry is evaluated.•Calculation of dose in different substructures of the eye is performed.•125I plaques are the most used for ocular treatments; however, 103Pd plaques seem to be better by a dosimetric point of view.</abstract><pub>Elsevier Ltd</pub><doi>10.1016/j.apradiso.2022.110146</doi><tpages>1</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9246-6219</orcidid></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0969-8043 |
ispartof | Applied radiation and isotopes, 2022-04, Vol.182, p.110146-110146, Article 110146 |
issn | 0969-8043 1872-9800 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2630918989 |
source | Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals Complete |
subjects | 103Pd 125I 131Cs Dosimetry Eye plaque Monte Carlo Radiosensitive organ |
title | Comparison between dose distribution from 103Pd, 131Cs, and 125I plaques in a real human eye model with different tumor size |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-03T14%3A15%3A38IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Comparison%20between%20dose%20distribution%20from%20103Pd,%20131Cs,%20and%20125I%20plaques%20in%20a%20real%20human%20eye%20model%20with%20different%20tumor%20size&rft.jtitle=Applied%20radiation%20and%20isotopes&rft.au=Taherparvar,%20Payvand&rft.date=2022-04&rft.volume=182&rft.spage=110146&rft.epage=110146&rft.pages=110146-110146&rft.artnum=110146&rft.issn=0969-8043&rft.eissn=1872-9800&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.apradiso.2022.110146&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2630918989%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2630918989&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_els_id=S0969804322000483&rfr_iscdi=true |