Comparison between dose distribution from 103Pd, 131Cs, and 125I plaques in a real human eye model with different tumor size

Knowledge of the energy deposition in different eye components is a critical decision-making to the overall effectivity of ocular melanoma treatment with plaques loaded with low-energy sources. The aim of this study is using the GATE 8.2 Monte Carlo code to calculate the 3D dose distribution in a re...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Applied radiation and isotopes 2022-04, Vol.182, p.110146-110146, Article 110146
Hauptverfasser: Taherparvar, Payvand, Fardi, Zeinab
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 110146
container_issue
container_start_page 110146
container_title Applied radiation and isotopes
container_volume 182
creator Taherparvar, Payvand
Fardi, Zeinab
description Knowledge of the energy deposition in different eye components is a critical decision-making to the overall effectivity of ocular melanoma treatment with plaques loaded with low-energy sources. The aim of this study is using the GATE 8.2 Monte Carlo code to calculate the 3D dose distribution in a realistic eye model. At first, we validated the GATE simulation for 125I, 103Pd, and 131Cs seeds by calculating the dose rate constant, radial dose function, and anisotropy function of the three radioactive sources. Then, a 12-mm Collaborative Ocular Melanoma Study (COMS) eye plaque was simulated in the eye phantoms to evaluate dose distribution due to low-energy gamma emitters on the three simulated medium-sized tumors. The findings of this study indicate that the estimated doses received by different eye substructures strongly depend on the source type. The results show that the type of seeds used in the plaque, as well as the size of the eye tumor, have significant effects on the dose deposition in the different structures of the eye and dose deposition uniformity. Moreover, comparing different radionuclides showed that the COMS plaque fully loaded with 103Pd presents a higher dose delivery to the tumor and a lower one to the critical structures for medium-sized tumors, while the plaque fully loaded with 131Cs produces the most uniform dose distribution in the tumor. •Comparison between 103Pd, 131Cs, and 125I plaques using GATE in a standard eye model geometry is evaluated.•Calculation of dose in different substructures of the eye is performed.•125I plaques are the most used for ocular treatments; however, 103Pd plaques seem to be better by a dosimetric point of view.
doi_str_mv 10.1016/j.apradiso.2022.110146
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2630918989</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S0969804322000483</els_id><sourcerecordid>2630918989</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c1909-de94157674f51c9991133867702cba8b2ac0dbc209b44c29bce5ee1d78243b563</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFkE1r3DAQhkVpods0fyHMsYd4MyN_SbeWpR-BQHtIz0KWxkSLbbmS3ZDQH18v255zGpiZ92HmEeKKcE9Izc1xb-dkfchxL1HKPW3dqnkldqRaWWiF-FrsUDe6UFiVb8W7nI-IWCktd-LPIY6zTVt4go6XR-YJfMwMG29JoVuXsE36FEcgLH_4a6CSDvka7OSBZH0L82B_rZwhTGAhsR3gYR3tBPzEMEbPAzyG5WHj9T0nnhZY1jEmyOGZ34s3vR0yX_6rF-Lnl8_3h2_F3fevt4dPd4UjjbrwrCuq26at-pqc1pqoLFXTtihdZ1UnrUPfOYm6qyondee4ZibfKlmVXd2UF-LDmTuneLp1MWPIjofBThzXbGRToialld5Wm_OqSzHnxL2ZUxhtejKE5qTbHM1_3eak25x1b8GP5yBvj_wOnEx2gSfHPiR2i_ExvIT4C6jDixM</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2630918989</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Comparison between dose distribution from 103Pd, 131Cs, and 125I plaques in a real human eye model with different tumor size</title><source>Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals Complete</source><creator>Taherparvar, Payvand ; Fardi, Zeinab</creator><creatorcontrib>Taherparvar, Payvand ; Fardi, Zeinab</creatorcontrib><description>Knowledge of the energy deposition in different eye components is a critical decision-making to the overall effectivity of ocular melanoma treatment with plaques loaded with low-energy sources. The aim of this study is using the GATE 8.2 Monte Carlo code to calculate the 3D dose distribution in a realistic eye model. At first, we validated the GATE simulation for 125I, 103Pd, and 131Cs seeds by calculating the dose rate constant, radial dose function, and anisotropy function of the three radioactive sources. Then, a 12-mm Collaborative Ocular Melanoma Study (COMS) eye plaque was simulated in the eye phantoms to evaluate dose distribution due to low-energy gamma emitters on the three simulated medium-sized tumors. The findings of this study indicate that the estimated doses received by different eye substructures strongly depend on the source type. The results show that the type of seeds used in the plaque, as well as the size of the eye tumor, have significant effects on the dose deposition in the different structures of the eye and dose deposition uniformity. Moreover, comparing different radionuclides showed that the COMS plaque fully loaded with 103Pd presents a higher dose delivery to the tumor and a lower one to the critical structures for medium-sized tumors, while the plaque fully loaded with 131Cs produces the most uniform dose distribution in the tumor. •Comparison between 103Pd, 131Cs, and 125I plaques using GATE in a standard eye model geometry is evaluated.•Calculation of dose in different substructures of the eye is performed.•125I plaques are the most used for ocular treatments; however, 103Pd plaques seem to be better by a dosimetric point of view.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0969-8043</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1872-9800</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.apradiso.2022.110146</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Elsevier Ltd</publisher><subject>103Pd ; 125I ; 131Cs ; Dosimetry ; Eye plaque ; Monte Carlo ; Radiosensitive organ</subject><ispartof>Applied radiation and isotopes, 2022-04, Vol.182, p.110146-110146, Article 110146</ispartof><rights>2022 Elsevier Ltd</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c1909-de94157674f51c9991133867702cba8b2ac0dbc209b44c29bce5ee1d78243b563</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c1909-de94157674f51c9991133867702cba8b2ac0dbc209b44c29bce5ee1d78243b563</cites><orcidid>0000-0001-9246-6219</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.apradiso.2022.110146$$EHTML$$P50$$Gelsevier$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,3550,27924,27925,45995</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Taherparvar, Payvand</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Fardi, Zeinab</creatorcontrib><title>Comparison between dose distribution from 103Pd, 131Cs, and 125I plaques in a real human eye model with different tumor size</title><title>Applied radiation and isotopes</title><description>Knowledge of the energy deposition in different eye components is a critical decision-making to the overall effectivity of ocular melanoma treatment with plaques loaded with low-energy sources. The aim of this study is using the GATE 8.2 Monte Carlo code to calculate the 3D dose distribution in a realistic eye model. At first, we validated the GATE simulation for 125I, 103Pd, and 131Cs seeds by calculating the dose rate constant, radial dose function, and anisotropy function of the three radioactive sources. Then, a 12-mm Collaborative Ocular Melanoma Study (COMS) eye plaque was simulated in the eye phantoms to evaluate dose distribution due to low-energy gamma emitters on the three simulated medium-sized tumors. The findings of this study indicate that the estimated doses received by different eye substructures strongly depend on the source type. The results show that the type of seeds used in the plaque, as well as the size of the eye tumor, have significant effects on the dose deposition in the different structures of the eye and dose deposition uniformity. Moreover, comparing different radionuclides showed that the COMS plaque fully loaded with 103Pd presents a higher dose delivery to the tumor and a lower one to the critical structures for medium-sized tumors, while the plaque fully loaded with 131Cs produces the most uniform dose distribution in the tumor. •Comparison between 103Pd, 131Cs, and 125I plaques using GATE in a standard eye model geometry is evaluated.•Calculation of dose in different substructures of the eye is performed.•125I plaques are the most used for ocular treatments; however, 103Pd plaques seem to be better by a dosimetric point of view.</description><subject>103Pd</subject><subject>125I</subject><subject>131Cs</subject><subject>Dosimetry</subject><subject>Eye plaque</subject><subject>Monte Carlo</subject><subject>Radiosensitive organ</subject><issn>0969-8043</issn><issn>1872-9800</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2022</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNqFkE1r3DAQhkVpods0fyHMsYd4MyN_SbeWpR-BQHtIz0KWxkSLbbmS3ZDQH18v255zGpiZ92HmEeKKcE9Izc1xb-dkfchxL1HKPW3dqnkldqRaWWiF-FrsUDe6UFiVb8W7nI-IWCktd-LPIY6zTVt4go6XR-YJfMwMG29JoVuXsE36FEcgLH_4a6CSDvka7OSBZH0L82B_rZwhTGAhsR3gYR3tBPzEMEbPAzyG5WHj9T0nnhZY1jEmyOGZ34s3vR0yX_6rF-Lnl8_3h2_F3fevt4dPd4UjjbrwrCuq26at-pqc1pqoLFXTtihdZ1UnrUPfOYm6qyondee4ZibfKlmVXd2UF-LDmTuneLp1MWPIjofBThzXbGRToialld5Wm_OqSzHnxL2ZUxhtejKE5qTbHM1_3eak25x1b8GP5yBvj_wOnEx2gSfHPiR2i_ExvIT4C6jDixM</recordid><startdate>202204</startdate><enddate>202204</enddate><creator>Taherparvar, Payvand</creator><creator>Fardi, Zeinab</creator><general>Elsevier Ltd</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9246-6219</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>202204</creationdate><title>Comparison between dose distribution from 103Pd, 131Cs, and 125I plaques in a real human eye model with different tumor size</title><author>Taherparvar, Payvand ; Fardi, Zeinab</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c1909-de94157674f51c9991133867702cba8b2ac0dbc209b44c29bce5ee1d78243b563</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2022</creationdate><topic>103Pd</topic><topic>125I</topic><topic>131Cs</topic><topic>Dosimetry</topic><topic>Eye plaque</topic><topic>Monte Carlo</topic><topic>Radiosensitive organ</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Taherparvar, Payvand</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Fardi, Zeinab</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Applied radiation and isotopes</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Taherparvar, Payvand</au><au>Fardi, Zeinab</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Comparison between dose distribution from 103Pd, 131Cs, and 125I plaques in a real human eye model with different tumor size</atitle><jtitle>Applied radiation and isotopes</jtitle><date>2022-04</date><risdate>2022</risdate><volume>182</volume><spage>110146</spage><epage>110146</epage><pages>110146-110146</pages><artnum>110146</artnum><issn>0969-8043</issn><eissn>1872-9800</eissn><abstract>Knowledge of the energy deposition in different eye components is a critical decision-making to the overall effectivity of ocular melanoma treatment with plaques loaded with low-energy sources. The aim of this study is using the GATE 8.2 Monte Carlo code to calculate the 3D dose distribution in a realistic eye model. At first, we validated the GATE simulation for 125I, 103Pd, and 131Cs seeds by calculating the dose rate constant, radial dose function, and anisotropy function of the three radioactive sources. Then, a 12-mm Collaborative Ocular Melanoma Study (COMS) eye plaque was simulated in the eye phantoms to evaluate dose distribution due to low-energy gamma emitters on the three simulated medium-sized tumors. The findings of this study indicate that the estimated doses received by different eye substructures strongly depend on the source type. The results show that the type of seeds used in the plaque, as well as the size of the eye tumor, have significant effects on the dose deposition in the different structures of the eye and dose deposition uniformity. Moreover, comparing different radionuclides showed that the COMS plaque fully loaded with 103Pd presents a higher dose delivery to the tumor and a lower one to the critical structures for medium-sized tumors, while the plaque fully loaded with 131Cs produces the most uniform dose distribution in the tumor. •Comparison between 103Pd, 131Cs, and 125I plaques using GATE in a standard eye model geometry is evaluated.•Calculation of dose in different substructures of the eye is performed.•125I plaques are the most used for ocular treatments; however, 103Pd plaques seem to be better by a dosimetric point of view.</abstract><pub>Elsevier Ltd</pub><doi>10.1016/j.apradiso.2022.110146</doi><tpages>1</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9246-6219</orcidid></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0969-8043
ispartof Applied radiation and isotopes, 2022-04, Vol.182, p.110146-110146, Article 110146
issn 0969-8043
1872-9800
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2630918989
source Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals Complete
subjects 103Pd
125I
131Cs
Dosimetry
Eye plaque
Monte Carlo
Radiosensitive organ
title Comparison between dose distribution from 103Pd, 131Cs, and 125I plaques in a real human eye model with different tumor size
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-03T14%3A15%3A38IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Comparison%20between%20dose%20distribution%20from%20103Pd,%20131Cs,%20and%20125I%20plaques%20in%20a%20real%20human%20eye%20model%20with%20different%20tumor%20size&rft.jtitle=Applied%20radiation%20and%20isotopes&rft.au=Taherparvar,%20Payvand&rft.date=2022-04&rft.volume=182&rft.spage=110146&rft.epage=110146&rft.pages=110146-110146&rft.artnum=110146&rft.issn=0969-8043&rft.eissn=1872-9800&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.apradiso.2022.110146&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2630918989%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2630918989&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_els_id=S0969804322000483&rfr_iscdi=true