Factors associated with improvement or loss of internal rotation after reverse shoulder arthroplasty

Internal rotation (IR) with reverse total shoulder arthroplasty (rTSA) can be unpredictable. Identifying the factors associated with loss of or improved IR could aid preoperative patient counseling. This study quantifies the change in IR experienced by rTSA patients with nonfracture indications and...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Journal of shoulder and elbow surgery 2022-07, Vol.31 (7), p.e346-e358
Hauptverfasser: Rohman, Eric, King, Joseph J., Roche, Christopher P., Fan, Wen, Kilian, Christopher M., Papandrea, Rick F.
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page e358
container_issue 7
container_start_page e346
container_title Journal of shoulder and elbow surgery
container_volume 31
creator Rohman, Eric
King, Joseph J.
Roche, Christopher P.
Fan, Wen
Kilian, Christopher M.
Papandrea, Rick F.
description Internal rotation (IR) with reverse total shoulder arthroplasty (rTSA) can be unpredictable. Identifying the factors associated with loss of or improved IR could aid preoperative patient counseling. This study quantifies the change in IR experienced by rTSA patients with nonfracture indications and identifies the patient, implant, and operative factors associated with IR loss or gain at 2-year minimum follow-up. A total of 1978 primary rTSA patients were analyzed from an international database of a single rTSA prosthesis to quantify IR at 2 years’ minimum follow-up. rTSA patients were divided into 2 cohorts based on their preoperative IR score, with group 1 patients having less active IR as defined by a preoperative IR score ≤3 and group 2 patients having greater active IR as defined by a preoperative IR score ≥4 (ie, L5 or higher). For both group 1 and 2 patients, univariate and multivariate analyses were performed to quantify the risk factors associated with IR loss after rTSA. Overall, 58.9% of rTSA patients experienced IR improvement and 17.0% lost IR after rTSA. The occurrence of IR loss or gain was dependent on preoperative IR score, as 73.2% of group 1 patients improved IR and only 40.1% of group 2 patients improved IR, whereas 31.0% of group 2 patients lost IR and only 6.3% of group 1 patients lost IR after rTSA. Numerous risk factors for IR loss were identified. For group 1 patients, male sex (P = .004, odds ratio [OR] = 2.056), tobacco usage (P = .004, OR = 0.348), larger humeral stem diameter (P = .008, OR = 0.852), and not having subscapularis repaired (P = .002, OR = 2.654) were significant risk factors for IR loss. For group 2 patients, male sex (P = .005, OR = 1.656), higher body mass index (P = .002, OR = 0.946), a diagnosis other than osteoarthritis (P 
doi_str_mv 10.1016/j.jse.2022.01.124
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2629386342</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S105827462200218X</els_id><sourcerecordid>2629386342</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c353t-be4d1b8cbf0290a6482ebab2b01ef105553d3858dc45fb5ca720f7f45f4bfc973</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kElrHDEQhUVwiNcfkEvQ0ZfulKRWL_gUTGwHDL44Z6GlxGjobo0lzQT_-8iMk6NPtfDqUe8j5CuDlgHrv2_bbcaWA-ctsJbx7hM5Y1LwppcAJ7UHOTZ86PpTcp7zFgCmDvgXciok64eJyTPi7rQtMWWqc4426IKO_gllQ8OyS_GAC66FxkTnmDONnoa1YFr1TFMsuoS4Uu3rhiY8YMpI8ybuZ1cXOpVNirtZ5_J6ST57PWe8eq8X5Pfdz-fbh-bx6f7X7Y_HxgopSmOwc8yM1njgE-i-GzkabbgBhr5mkVI4McrR2U56I60eOPjB16Ez3k6DuCDXR9_6-ssec1FLyBbnWa8Y91nxnk9i7EXHq5QdpTbVZAm92qWw6PSqGKg3uGqrKlz1BlcBUxVuvfn2br83C7r_F_9oVsHNUYA15CFgUtkGXC26kNAW5WL4wP4vbkCM9Q</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2629386342</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Factors associated with improvement or loss of internal rotation after reverse shoulder arthroplasty</title><source>Access via ScienceDirect (Elsevier)</source><creator>Rohman, Eric ; King, Joseph J. ; Roche, Christopher P. ; Fan, Wen ; Kilian, Christopher M. ; Papandrea, Rick F.</creator><creatorcontrib>Rohman, Eric ; King, Joseph J. ; Roche, Christopher P. ; Fan, Wen ; Kilian, Christopher M. ; Papandrea, Rick F.</creatorcontrib><description>Internal rotation (IR) with reverse total shoulder arthroplasty (rTSA) can be unpredictable. Identifying the factors associated with loss of or improved IR could aid preoperative patient counseling. This study quantifies the change in IR experienced by rTSA patients with nonfracture indications and identifies the patient, implant, and operative factors associated with IR loss or gain at 2-year minimum follow-up. A total of 1978 primary rTSA patients were analyzed from an international database of a single rTSA prosthesis to quantify IR at 2 years’ minimum follow-up. rTSA patients were divided into 2 cohorts based on their preoperative IR score, with group 1 patients having less active IR as defined by a preoperative IR score ≤3 and group 2 patients having greater active IR as defined by a preoperative IR score ≥4 (ie, L5 or higher). For both group 1 and 2 patients, univariate and multivariate analyses were performed to quantify the risk factors associated with IR loss after rTSA. Overall, 58.9% of rTSA patients experienced IR improvement and 17.0% lost IR after rTSA. The occurrence of IR loss or gain was dependent on preoperative IR score, as 73.2% of group 1 patients improved IR and only 40.1% of group 2 patients improved IR, whereas 31.0% of group 2 patients lost IR and only 6.3% of group 1 patients lost IR after rTSA. Numerous risk factors for IR loss were identified. For group 1 patients, male sex (P = .004, odds ratio [OR] = 2.056), tobacco usage (P = .004, OR = 0.348), larger humeral stem diameter (P = .008, OR = 0.852), and not having subscapularis repaired (P = .002, OR = 2.654) were significant risk factors for IR loss. For group 2 patients, male sex (P = .005, OR = 1.656), higher body mass index (P = .002, OR = 0.946), a diagnosis other than osteoarthritis (P &lt; .001, OR = 2.189), nonaugmented baseplate usage (P &lt; .001, OR = 2.116), and not having subscapularis repaired (P &lt; .001, OR = 3.052) were significant risk factors for IR loss. The majority of patients improve IR after rTSA in the nonfracture setting. rTSA patients with substantial IR prior to surgery had a greater probability for losing IR compared to patients with poor preoperative IR. Numerous risk factors for IR loss were identified; these risk factors are useful for counseling patients considering rTSA, as some patients are more likely to lose IR than others.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1058-2746</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1532-6500</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.jse.2022.01.124</identifier><identifier>PMID: 35167915</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>United States: Elsevier Inc</publisher><subject>internal rotation ; Reverse shoulder arthroplasty ; risk factors</subject><ispartof>Journal of shoulder and elbow surgery, 2022-07, Vol.31 (7), p.e346-e358</ispartof><rights>2022 Journal of Shoulder and Elbow Surgery Board of Trustees</rights><rights>Copyright © 2022. Published by Elsevier Inc.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c353t-be4d1b8cbf0290a6482ebab2b01ef105553d3858dc45fb5ca720f7f45f4bfc973</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c353t-be4d1b8cbf0290a6482ebab2b01ef105553d3858dc45fb5ca720f7f45f4bfc973</cites><orcidid>0000-0003-3801-3272 ; 0000-0003-2635-5785 ; 0000-0002-7181-084X</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jse.2022.01.124$$EHTML$$P50$$Gelsevier$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,3550,27924,27925,45995</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35167915$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Rohman, Eric</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>King, Joseph J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Roche, Christopher P.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Fan, Wen</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kilian, Christopher M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Papandrea, Rick F.</creatorcontrib><title>Factors associated with improvement or loss of internal rotation after reverse shoulder arthroplasty</title><title>Journal of shoulder and elbow surgery</title><addtitle>J Shoulder Elbow Surg</addtitle><description>Internal rotation (IR) with reverse total shoulder arthroplasty (rTSA) can be unpredictable. Identifying the factors associated with loss of or improved IR could aid preoperative patient counseling. This study quantifies the change in IR experienced by rTSA patients with nonfracture indications and identifies the patient, implant, and operative factors associated with IR loss or gain at 2-year minimum follow-up. A total of 1978 primary rTSA patients were analyzed from an international database of a single rTSA prosthesis to quantify IR at 2 years’ minimum follow-up. rTSA patients were divided into 2 cohorts based on their preoperative IR score, with group 1 patients having less active IR as defined by a preoperative IR score ≤3 and group 2 patients having greater active IR as defined by a preoperative IR score ≥4 (ie, L5 or higher). For both group 1 and 2 patients, univariate and multivariate analyses were performed to quantify the risk factors associated with IR loss after rTSA. Overall, 58.9% of rTSA patients experienced IR improvement and 17.0% lost IR after rTSA. The occurrence of IR loss or gain was dependent on preoperative IR score, as 73.2% of group 1 patients improved IR and only 40.1% of group 2 patients improved IR, whereas 31.0% of group 2 patients lost IR and only 6.3% of group 1 patients lost IR after rTSA. Numerous risk factors for IR loss were identified. For group 1 patients, male sex (P = .004, odds ratio [OR] = 2.056), tobacco usage (P = .004, OR = 0.348), larger humeral stem diameter (P = .008, OR = 0.852), and not having subscapularis repaired (P = .002, OR = 2.654) were significant risk factors for IR loss. For group 2 patients, male sex (P = .005, OR = 1.656), higher body mass index (P = .002, OR = 0.946), a diagnosis other than osteoarthritis (P &lt; .001, OR = 2.189), nonaugmented baseplate usage (P &lt; .001, OR = 2.116), and not having subscapularis repaired (P &lt; .001, OR = 3.052) were significant risk factors for IR loss. The majority of patients improve IR after rTSA in the nonfracture setting. rTSA patients with substantial IR prior to surgery had a greater probability for losing IR compared to patients with poor preoperative IR. Numerous risk factors for IR loss were identified; these risk factors are useful for counseling patients considering rTSA, as some patients are more likely to lose IR than others.</description><subject>internal rotation</subject><subject>Reverse shoulder arthroplasty</subject><subject>risk factors</subject><issn>1058-2746</issn><issn>1532-6500</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2022</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNp9kElrHDEQhUVwiNcfkEvQ0ZfulKRWL_gUTGwHDL44Z6GlxGjobo0lzQT_-8iMk6NPtfDqUe8j5CuDlgHrv2_bbcaWA-ctsJbx7hM5Y1LwppcAJ7UHOTZ86PpTcp7zFgCmDvgXciok64eJyTPi7rQtMWWqc4426IKO_gllQ8OyS_GAC66FxkTnmDONnoa1YFr1TFMsuoS4Uu3rhiY8YMpI8ybuZ1cXOpVNirtZ5_J6ST57PWe8eq8X5Pfdz-fbh-bx6f7X7Y_HxgopSmOwc8yM1njgE-i-GzkabbgBhr5mkVI4McrR2U56I60eOPjB16Ez3k6DuCDXR9_6-ssec1FLyBbnWa8Y91nxnk9i7EXHq5QdpTbVZAm92qWw6PSqGKg3uGqrKlz1BlcBUxVuvfn2br83C7r_F_9oVsHNUYA15CFgUtkGXC26kNAW5WL4wP4vbkCM9Q</recordid><startdate>20220701</startdate><enddate>20220701</enddate><creator>Rohman, Eric</creator><creator>King, Joseph J.</creator><creator>Roche, Christopher P.</creator><creator>Fan, Wen</creator><creator>Kilian, Christopher M.</creator><creator>Papandrea, Rick F.</creator><general>Elsevier Inc</general><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3801-3272</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2635-5785</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7181-084X</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20220701</creationdate><title>Factors associated with improvement or loss of internal rotation after reverse shoulder arthroplasty</title><author>Rohman, Eric ; King, Joseph J. ; Roche, Christopher P. ; Fan, Wen ; Kilian, Christopher M. ; Papandrea, Rick F.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c353t-be4d1b8cbf0290a6482ebab2b01ef105553d3858dc45fb5ca720f7f45f4bfc973</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2022</creationdate><topic>internal rotation</topic><topic>Reverse shoulder arthroplasty</topic><topic>risk factors</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Rohman, Eric</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>King, Joseph J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Roche, Christopher P.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Fan, Wen</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kilian, Christopher M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Papandrea, Rick F.</creatorcontrib><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Journal of shoulder and elbow surgery</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Rohman, Eric</au><au>King, Joseph J.</au><au>Roche, Christopher P.</au><au>Fan, Wen</au><au>Kilian, Christopher M.</au><au>Papandrea, Rick F.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Factors associated with improvement or loss of internal rotation after reverse shoulder arthroplasty</atitle><jtitle>Journal of shoulder and elbow surgery</jtitle><addtitle>J Shoulder Elbow Surg</addtitle><date>2022-07-01</date><risdate>2022</risdate><volume>31</volume><issue>7</issue><spage>e346</spage><epage>e358</epage><pages>e346-e358</pages><issn>1058-2746</issn><eissn>1532-6500</eissn><abstract>Internal rotation (IR) with reverse total shoulder arthroplasty (rTSA) can be unpredictable. Identifying the factors associated with loss of or improved IR could aid preoperative patient counseling. This study quantifies the change in IR experienced by rTSA patients with nonfracture indications and identifies the patient, implant, and operative factors associated with IR loss or gain at 2-year minimum follow-up. A total of 1978 primary rTSA patients were analyzed from an international database of a single rTSA prosthesis to quantify IR at 2 years’ minimum follow-up. rTSA patients were divided into 2 cohorts based on their preoperative IR score, with group 1 patients having less active IR as defined by a preoperative IR score ≤3 and group 2 patients having greater active IR as defined by a preoperative IR score ≥4 (ie, L5 or higher). For both group 1 and 2 patients, univariate and multivariate analyses were performed to quantify the risk factors associated with IR loss after rTSA. Overall, 58.9% of rTSA patients experienced IR improvement and 17.0% lost IR after rTSA. The occurrence of IR loss or gain was dependent on preoperative IR score, as 73.2% of group 1 patients improved IR and only 40.1% of group 2 patients improved IR, whereas 31.0% of group 2 patients lost IR and only 6.3% of group 1 patients lost IR after rTSA. Numerous risk factors for IR loss were identified. For group 1 patients, male sex (P = .004, odds ratio [OR] = 2.056), tobacco usage (P = .004, OR = 0.348), larger humeral stem diameter (P = .008, OR = 0.852), and not having subscapularis repaired (P = .002, OR = 2.654) were significant risk factors for IR loss. For group 2 patients, male sex (P = .005, OR = 1.656), higher body mass index (P = .002, OR = 0.946), a diagnosis other than osteoarthritis (P &lt; .001, OR = 2.189), nonaugmented baseplate usage (P &lt; .001, OR = 2.116), and not having subscapularis repaired (P &lt; .001, OR = 3.052) were significant risk factors for IR loss. The majority of patients improve IR after rTSA in the nonfracture setting. rTSA patients with substantial IR prior to surgery had a greater probability for losing IR compared to patients with poor preoperative IR. Numerous risk factors for IR loss were identified; these risk factors are useful for counseling patients considering rTSA, as some patients are more likely to lose IR than others.</abstract><cop>United States</cop><pub>Elsevier Inc</pub><pmid>35167915</pmid><doi>10.1016/j.jse.2022.01.124</doi><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3801-3272</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2635-5785</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7181-084X</orcidid></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 1058-2746
ispartof Journal of shoulder and elbow surgery, 2022-07, Vol.31 (7), p.e346-e358
issn 1058-2746
1532-6500
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2629386342
source Access via ScienceDirect (Elsevier)
subjects internal rotation
Reverse shoulder arthroplasty
risk factors
title Factors associated with improvement or loss of internal rotation after reverse shoulder arthroplasty
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-19T18%3A29%3A19IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Factors%20associated%20with%20improvement%20or%20loss%20of%20internal%20rotation%20after%20reverse%20shoulder%20arthroplasty&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20shoulder%20and%20elbow%20surgery&rft.au=Rohman,%20Eric&rft.date=2022-07-01&rft.volume=31&rft.issue=7&rft.spage=e346&rft.epage=e358&rft.pages=e346-e358&rft.issn=1058-2746&rft.eissn=1532-6500&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.jse.2022.01.124&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2629386342%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2629386342&rft_id=info:pmid/35167915&rft_els_id=S105827462200218X&rfr_iscdi=true