Distinct pathologic feature of myeloid neoplasm with t(v;11p15); NUP98 rearrangement
Chromosome rearrangements involving NUP98 at 11p15 are rare but recurring abnormalities in acute myeloid leukemia (AML). Here we described 12 cases of myeloid neoplasms with t(v; 11p15); NUP98 rearrangement and characterized their pathologic features. Our patient cohort included 10 adults and 2 chil...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Human pathology 2022-05, Vol.123, p.11-19 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 19 |
---|---|
container_issue | |
container_start_page | 11 |
container_title | Human pathology |
container_volume | 123 |
creator | Lauw, Marietya I.S. Qi, Zhongxia Eversmeyer, Lauren Prakash, Sonam Wen, Kwun Wah Yu, Jingwei Monaghan, Sara A. Aggarwal, Nidhi Wang, Linlin |
description | Chromosome rearrangements involving NUP98 at 11p15 are rare but recurring abnormalities in acute myeloid leukemia (AML). Here we described 12 cases of myeloid neoplasms with t(v; 11p15); NUP98 rearrangement and characterized their pathologic features. Our patient cohort included 10 adults and 2 children with a median age of 51 years. They were predominantly AML (n = 10) including de novo AML, therapy-related AML, chronic myeloid leukemia with myeloid blast crisis, and mixed phenotype acute leukemia, as well as therapy-related myelodysplastic syndrome (MDS) and MDS/myeloproliferative neoplasm with increased blasts. The blasts shared some common features including pink/red cytoplasmic granules, presence of a perinuclear hof, Auer rods, and occasional bilobed nuclei, mimicking acute promyelocytic leukemia (APML). Flow cytometric studies showed blasts positive for MPO, CD117, CD13 and CD33, with a subset of cases negative for CD34 and/or HLA-DR and a subset of cases expressing monocytic markers. The translocations of 11p15 included t(7; 11) (p15; p15), t(2; 11) (q31; p15), t(9; 11) (p22; p15), t(5; 11) (q32; p15), and t(11; 12) (p15; q13). Three cases showed cryptic NUP98 rearrangement. These patients showed incomplete response to therapy with median overall survival of 17.5 months, a complete remission rate of 25% following chemotherapy induction and primary refractory disease of 58%. It is clinically important to recognize this group of diseases because the blasts can be misclassified as promyelocytes, and NUP98 rearrangement may be cryptic requiring fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) study. This case series highlights that NUP98-rearranged myeloid neoplasms are clinically, morphologically, and cytogenetically distinct and could be considered as a separate entity in the WHO classification defined by cytogenetic abnormality.
•AML with NUP98 rearrangement mimic acute promyelocytic leukemia.•NUP98 rearrangement may be cryptic.•AML with NUP98 shows incomplete response to treatment. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1016/j.humpath.2022.02.004 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2629386144</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S0046817722000326</els_id><sourcerecordid>2629386144</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c393t-b5cd29df9bb04754c8a4c03278cdfdf707584683e67c3adac5e171822e1bf6e93</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFkE2LFDEQhoMo7rj6E5SAl_XQYz47afYgsn7Coh52zyGdVO9k6O60SXpl_70ZZvTgRSgoKJ56q3gQeknJlhLavt1vd-u02LLbMsLYltQi4hHaUMlZo3nHHqNNnbSNpkqdoWc57wmhVAr5FJ1xSVulO7FBNx9CLmF2BR-y4hjvgsMD2LImwHHA0wOMMXg8Q1xGmyf8K5QdLhf3l5QuVL65xN9uf3QaJ7Ap2fkOJpjLc_RksGOGF6d-jm4_fby5-tJcf__89er9deN4x0vTS-dZ54eu74lQUjhthSOcKe384AdFlNSi1Rxa5bj11kmgimrGgPZDCx0_RxfH3CXFnyvkYqaQHYyjre-u2bCWdVy3VIiKvv4H3cc1zfW7SkkuhVJcV0oeKZdizgkGs6Qw2fRgKDEH7WZvTtrNQbshtcgh_dUpfe0n8H-3_niuwLsjAFXHfYBksgswO_AhgSvGx_CfE78BgdSU5A</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2653547738</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Distinct pathologic feature of myeloid neoplasm with t(v;11p15); NUP98 rearrangement</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals Complete</source><creator>Lauw, Marietya I.S. ; Qi, Zhongxia ; Eversmeyer, Lauren ; Prakash, Sonam ; Wen, Kwun Wah ; Yu, Jingwei ; Monaghan, Sara A. ; Aggarwal, Nidhi ; Wang, Linlin</creator><creatorcontrib>Lauw, Marietya I.S. ; Qi, Zhongxia ; Eversmeyer, Lauren ; Prakash, Sonam ; Wen, Kwun Wah ; Yu, Jingwei ; Monaghan, Sara A. ; Aggarwal, Nidhi ; Wang, Linlin</creatorcontrib><description>Chromosome rearrangements involving NUP98 at 11p15 are rare but recurring abnormalities in acute myeloid leukemia (AML). Here we described 12 cases of myeloid neoplasms with t(v; 11p15); NUP98 rearrangement and characterized their pathologic features. Our patient cohort included 10 adults and 2 children with a median age of 51 years. They were predominantly AML (n = 10) including de novo AML, therapy-related AML, chronic myeloid leukemia with myeloid blast crisis, and mixed phenotype acute leukemia, as well as therapy-related myelodysplastic syndrome (MDS) and MDS/myeloproliferative neoplasm with increased blasts. The blasts shared some common features including pink/red cytoplasmic granules, presence of a perinuclear hof, Auer rods, and occasional bilobed nuclei, mimicking acute promyelocytic leukemia (APML). Flow cytometric studies showed blasts positive for MPO, CD117, CD13 and CD33, with a subset of cases negative for CD34 and/or HLA-DR and a subset of cases expressing monocytic markers. The translocations of 11p15 included t(7; 11) (p15; p15), t(2; 11) (q31; p15), t(9; 11) (p22; p15), t(5; 11) (q32; p15), and t(11; 12) (p15; q13). Three cases showed cryptic NUP98 rearrangement. These patients showed incomplete response to therapy with median overall survival of 17.5 months, a complete remission rate of 25% following chemotherapy induction and primary refractory disease of 58%. It is clinically important to recognize this group of diseases because the blasts can be misclassified as promyelocytes, and NUP98 rearrangement may be cryptic requiring fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) study. This case series highlights that NUP98-rearranged myeloid neoplasms are clinically, morphologically, and cytogenetically distinct and could be considered as a separate entity in the WHO classification defined by cytogenetic abnormality.
•AML with NUP98 rearrangement mimic acute promyelocytic leukemia.•NUP98 rearrangement may be cryptic.•AML with NUP98 shows incomplete response to treatment.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0046-8177</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1532-8392</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.humpath.2022.02.004</identifier><identifier>PMID: 35167894</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>United States: Elsevier Inc</publisher><subject>Bone marrow ; Chemotherapy ; Chromosome Aberrations ; Chromosomes ; Flow cytometry ; Genes ; Humans ; In Situ Hybridization, Fluorescence ; Laboratories ; Leukemia ; Leukemia, Myeloid, Acute - genetics ; Lymphoma ; Middle Aged ; Morphology ; Myelodysplastic syndromes ; Myeloid neoplasm ; Myeloproliferative Disorders - genetics ; Nuclear Pore Complex Proteins - genetics ; NUP98 FISH ; NUP98 rearrangement ; Patients ; Pediatrics ; Remission (Medicine) ; t(v;11p15) ; Translocation, Genetic ; Tumors</subject><ispartof>Human pathology, 2022-05, Vol.123, p.11-19</ispartof><rights>2022 Elsevier Inc.</rights><rights>Copyright © 2022 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.</rights><rights>2022. Elsevier Inc.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c393t-b5cd29df9bb04754c8a4c03278cdfdf707584683e67c3adac5e171822e1bf6e93</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c393t-b5cd29df9bb04754c8a4c03278cdfdf707584683e67c3adac5e171822e1bf6e93</cites><orcidid>0000-0003-1514-1044 ; 0000-0002-7296-3012 ; 0000-0001-5967-5190 ; 0000-0002-6299-9708 ; 0000-0001-5638-999X</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0046817722000326$$EHTML$$P50$$Gelsevier$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,3537,27901,27902,65306</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35167894$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Lauw, Marietya I.S.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Qi, Zhongxia</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Eversmeyer, Lauren</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Prakash, Sonam</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wen, Kwun Wah</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Yu, Jingwei</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Monaghan, Sara A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Aggarwal, Nidhi</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wang, Linlin</creatorcontrib><title>Distinct pathologic feature of myeloid neoplasm with t(v;11p15); NUP98 rearrangement</title><title>Human pathology</title><addtitle>Hum Pathol</addtitle><description>Chromosome rearrangements involving NUP98 at 11p15 are rare but recurring abnormalities in acute myeloid leukemia (AML). Here we described 12 cases of myeloid neoplasms with t(v; 11p15); NUP98 rearrangement and characterized their pathologic features. Our patient cohort included 10 adults and 2 children with a median age of 51 years. They were predominantly AML (n = 10) including de novo AML, therapy-related AML, chronic myeloid leukemia with myeloid blast crisis, and mixed phenotype acute leukemia, as well as therapy-related myelodysplastic syndrome (MDS) and MDS/myeloproliferative neoplasm with increased blasts. The blasts shared some common features including pink/red cytoplasmic granules, presence of a perinuclear hof, Auer rods, and occasional bilobed nuclei, mimicking acute promyelocytic leukemia (APML). Flow cytometric studies showed blasts positive for MPO, CD117, CD13 and CD33, with a subset of cases negative for CD34 and/or HLA-DR and a subset of cases expressing monocytic markers. The translocations of 11p15 included t(7; 11) (p15; p15), t(2; 11) (q31; p15), t(9; 11) (p22; p15), t(5; 11) (q32; p15), and t(11; 12) (p15; q13). Three cases showed cryptic NUP98 rearrangement. These patients showed incomplete response to therapy with median overall survival of 17.5 months, a complete remission rate of 25% following chemotherapy induction and primary refractory disease of 58%. It is clinically important to recognize this group of diseases because the blasts can be misclassified as promyelocytes, and NUP98 rearrangement may be cryptic requiring fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) study. This case series highlights that NUP98-rearranged myeloid neoplasms are clinically, morphologically, and cytogenetically distinct and could be considered as a separate entity in the WHO classification defined by cytogenetic abnormality.
•AML with NUP98 rearrangement mimic acute promyelocytic leukemia.•NUP98 rearrangement may be cryptic.•AML with NUP98 shows incomplete response to treatment.</description><subject>Bone marrow</subject><subject>Chemotherapy</subject><subject>Chromosome Aberrations</subject><subject>Chromosomes</subject><subject>Flow cytometry</subject><subject>Genes</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>In Situ Hybridization, Fluorescence</subject><subject>Laboratories</subject><subject>Leukemia</subject><subject>Leukemia, Myeloid, Acute - genetics</subject><subject>Lymphoma</subject><subject>Middle Aged</subject><subject>Morphology</subject><subject>Myelodysplastic syndromes</subject><subject>Myeloid neoplasm</subject><subject>Myeloproliferative Disorders - genetics</subject><subject>Nuclear Pore Complex Proteins - genetics</subject><subject>NUP98 FISH</subject><subject>NUP98 rearrangement</subject><subject>Patients</subject><subject>Pediatrics</subject><subject>Remission (Medicine)</subject><subject>t(v;11p15)</subject><subject>Translocation, Genetic</subject><subject>Tumors</subject><issn>0046-8177</issn><issn>1532-8392</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2022</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNqFkE2LFDEQhoMo7rj6E5SAl_XQYz47afYgsn7Coh52zyGdVO9k6O60SXpl_70ZZvTgRSgoKJ56q3gQeknJlhLavt1vd-u02LLbMsLYltQi4hHaUMlZo3nHHqNNnbSNpkqdoWc57wmhVAr5FJ1xSVulO7FBNx9CLmF2BR-y4hjvgsMD2LImwHHA0wOMMXg8Q1xGmyf8K5QdLhf3l5QuVL65xN9uf3QaJ7Ap2fkOJpjLc_RksGOGF6d-jm4_fby5-tJcf__89er9deN4x0vTS-dZ54eu74lQUjhthSOcKe384AdFlNSi1Rxa5bj11kmgimrGgPZDCx0_RxfH3CXFnyvkYqaQHYyjre-u2bCWdVy3VIiKvv4H3cc1zfW7SkkuhVJcV0oeKZdizgkGs6Qw2fRgKDEH7WZvTtrNQbshtcgh_dUpfe0n8H-3_niuwLsjAFXHfYBksgswO_AhgSvGx_CfE78BgdSU5A</recordid><startdate>202205</startdate><enddate>202205</enddate><creator>Lauw, Marietya I.S.</creator><creator>Qi, Zhongxia</creator><creator>Eversmeyer, Lauren</creator><creator>Prakash, Sonam</creator><creator>Wen, Kwun Wah</creator><creator>Yu, Jingwei</creator><creator>Monaghan, Sara A.</creator><creator>Aggarwal, Nidhi</creator><creator>Wang, Linlin</creator><general>Elsevier Inc</general><general>Elsevier Limited</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>7X8</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1514-1044</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7296-3012</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5967-5190</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6299-9708</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5638-999X</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>202205</creationdate><title>Distinct pathologic feature of myeloid neoplasm with t(v;11p15); NUP98 rearrangement</title><author>Lauw, Marietya I.S. ; Qi, Zhongxia ; Eversmeyer, Lauren ; Prakash, Sonam ; Wen, Kwun Wah ; Yu, Jingwei ; Monaghan, Sara A. ; Aggarwal, Nidhi ; Wang, Linlin</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c393t-b5cd29df9bb04754c8a4c03278cdfdf707584683e67c3adac5e171822e1bf6e93</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2022</creationdate><topic>Bone marrow</topic><topic>Chemotherapy</topic><topic>Chromosome Aberrations</topic><topic>Chromosomes</topic><topic>Flow cytometry</topic><topic>Genes</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>In Situ Hybridization, Fluorescence</topic><topic>Laboratories</topic><topic>Leukemia</topic><topic>Leukemia, Myeloid, Acute - genetics</topic><topic>Lymphoma</topic><topic>Middle Aged</topic><topic>Morphology</topic><topic>Myelodysplastic syndromes</topic><topic>Myeloid neoplasm</topic><topic>Myeloproliferative Disorders - genetics</topic><topic>Nuclear Pore Complex Proteins - genetics</topic><topic>NUP98 FISH</topic><topic>NUP98 rearrangement</topic><topic>Patients</topic><topic>Pediatrics</topic><topic>Remission (Medicine)</topic><topic>t(v;11p15)</topic><topic>Translocation, Genetic</topic><topic>Tumors</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Lauw, Marietya I.S.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Qi, Zhongxia</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Eversmeyer, Lauren</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Prakash, Sonam</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wen, Kwun Wah</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Yu, Jingwei</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Monaghan, Sara A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Aggarwal, Nidhi</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wang, Linlin</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Human pathology</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Lauw, Marietya I.S.</au><au>Qi, Zhongxia</au><au>Eversmeyer, Lauren</au><au>Prakash, Sonam</au><au>Wen, Kwun Wah</au><au>Yu, Jingwei</au><au>Monaghan, Sara A.</au><au>Aggarwal, Nidhi</au><au>Wang, Linlin</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Distinct pathologic feature of myeloid neoplasm with t(v;11p15); NUP98 rearrangement</atitle><jtitle>Human pathology</jtitle><addtitle>Hum Pathol</addtitle><date>2022-05</date><risdate>2022</risdate><volume>123</volume><spage>11</spage><epage>19</epage><pages>11-19</pages><issn>0046-8177</issn><eissn>1532-8392</eissn><abstract>Chromosome rearrangements involving NUP98 at 11p15 are rare but recurring abnormalities in acute myeloid leukemia (AML). Here we described 12 cases of myeloid neoplasms with t(v; 11p15); NUP98 rearrangement and characterized their pathologic features. Our patient cohort included 10 adults and 2 children with a median age of 51 years. They were predominantly AML (n = 10) including de novo AML, therapy-related AML, chronic myeloid leukemia with myeloid blast crisis, and mixed phenotype acute leukemia, as well as therapy-related myelodysplastic syndrome (MDS) and MDS/myeloproliferative neoplasm with increased blasts. The blasts shared some common features including pink/red cytoplasmic granules, presence of a perinuclear hof, Auer rods, and occasional bilobed nuclei, mimicking acute promyelocytic leukemia (APML). Flow cytometric studies showed blasts positive for MPO, CD117, CD13 and CD33, with a subset of cases negative for CD34 and/or HLA-DR and a subset of cases expressing monocytic markers. The translocations of 11p15 included t(7; 11) (p15; p15), t(2; 11) (q31; p15), t(9; 11) (p22; p15), t(5; 11) (q32; p15), and t(11; 12) (p15; q13). Three cases showed cryptic NUP98 rearrangement. These patients showed incomplete response to therapy with median overall survival of 17.5 months, a complete remission rate of 25% following chemotherapy induction and primary refractory disease of 58%. It is clinically important to recognize this group of diseases because the blasts can be misclassified as promyelocytes, and NUP98 rearrangement may be cryptic requiring fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) study. This case series highlights that NUP98-rearranged myeloid neoplasms are clinically, morphologically, and cytogenetically distinct and could be considered as a separate entity in the WHO classification defined by cytogenetic abnormality.
•AML with NUP98 rearrangement mimic acute promyelocytic leukemia.•NUP98 rearrangement may be cryptic.•AML with NUP98 shows incomplete response to treatment.</abstract><cop>United States</cop><pub>Elsevier Inc</pub><pmid>35167894</pmid><doi>10.1016/j.humpath.2022.02.004</doi><tpages>9</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1514-1044</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7296-3012</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5967-5190</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6299-9708</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5638-999X</orcidid></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0046-8177 |
ispartof | Human pathology, 2022-05, Vol.123, p.11-19 |
issn | 0046-8177 1532-8392 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2629386144 |
source | MEDLINE; Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals Complete |
subjects | Bone marrow Chemotherapy Chromosome Aberrations Chromosomes Flow cytometry Genes Humans In Situ Hybridization, Fluorescence Laboratories Leukemia Leukemia, Myeloid, Acute - genetics Lymphoma Middle Aged Morphology Myelodysplastic syndromes Myeloid neoplasm Myeloproliferative Disorders - genetics Nuclear Pore Complex Proteins - genetics NUP98 FISH NUP98 rearrangement Patients Pediatrics Remission (Medicine) t(v 11p15) Translocation, Genetic Tumors |
title | Distinct pathologic feature of myeloid neoplasm with t(v;11p15); NUP98 rearrangement |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-10T14%3A39%3A15IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Distinct%20pathologic%20feature%20of%20myeloid%20neoplasm%20with%20t(v;11p15);%20NUP98%20rearrangement&rft.jtitle=Human%20pathology&rft.au=Lauw,%20Marietya%20I.S.&rft.date=2022-05&rft.volume=123&rft.spage=11&rft.epage=19&rft.pages=11-19&rft.issn=0046-8177&rft.eissn=1532-8392&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.humpath.2022.02.004&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2629386144%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2653547738&rft_id=info:pmid/35167894&rft_els_id=S0046817722000326&rfr_iscdi=true |