Distinct pathologic feature of myeloid neoplasm with t(v;11p15); NUP98 rearrangement

Chromosome rearrangements involving NUP98 at 11p15 are rare but recurring abnormalities in acute myeloid leukemia (AML). Here we described 12 cases of myeloid neoplasms with t(v; 11p15); NUP98 rearrangement and characterized their pathologic features. Our patient cohort included 10 adults and 2 chil...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Human pathology 2022-05, Vol.123, p.11-19
Hauptverfasser: Lauw, Marietya I.S., Qi, Zhongxia, Eversmeyer, Lauren, Prakash, Sonam, Wen, Kwun Wah, Yu, Jingwei, Monaghan, Sara A., Aggarwal, Nidhi, Wang, Linlin
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 19
container_issue
container_start_page 11
container_title Human pathology
container_volume 123
creator Lauw, Marietya I.S.
Qi, Zhongxia
Eversmeyer, Lauren
Prakash, Sonam
Wen, Kwun Wah
Yu, Jingwei
Monaghan, Sara A.
Aggarwal, Nidhi
Wang, Linlin
description Chromosome rearrangements involving NUP98 at 11p15 are rare but recurring abnormalities in acute myeloid leukemia (AML). Here we described 12 cases of myeloid neoplasms with t(v; 11p15); NUP98 rearrangement and characterized their pathologic features. Our patient cohort included 10 adults and 2 children with a median age of 51 years. They were predominantly AML (n = 10) including de novo AML, therapy-related AML, chronic myeloid leukemia with myeloid blast crisis, and mixed phenotype acute leukemia, as well as therapy-related myelodysplastic syndrome (MDS) and MDS/myeloproliferative neoplasm with increased blasts. The blasts shared some common features including pink/red cytoplasmic granules, presence of a perinuclear hof, Auer rods, and occasional bilobed nuclei, mimicking acute promyelocytic leukemia (APML). Flow cytometric studies showed blasts positive for MPO, CD117, CD13 and CD33, with a subset of cases negative for CD34 and/or HLA-DR and a subset of cases expressing monocytic markers. The translocations of 11p15 included t(7; 11) (p15; p15), t(2; 11) (q31; p15), t(9; 11) (p22; p15), t(5; 11) (q32; p15), and t(11; 12) (p15; q13). Three cases showed cryptic NUP98 rearrangement. These patients showed incomplete response to therapy with median overall survival of 17.5 months, a complete remission rate of 25% following chemotherapy induction and primary refractory disease of 58%. It is clinically important to recognize this group of diseases because the blasts can be misclassified as promyelocytes, and NUP98 rearrangement may be cryptic requiring fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) study. This case series highlights that NUP98-rearranged myeloid neoplasms are clinically, morphologically, and cytogenetically distinct and could be considered as a separate entity in the WHO classification defined by cytogenetic abnormality. •AML with NUP98 rearrangement mimic acute promyelocytic leukemia.•NUP98 rearrangement may be cryptic.•AML with NUP98 shows incomplete response to treatment.
doi_str_mv 10.1016/j.humpath.2022.02.004
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2629386144</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S0046817722000326</els_id><sourcerecordid>2629386144</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c393t-b5cd29df9bb04754c8a4c03278cdfdf707584683e67c3adac5e171822e1bf6e93</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFkE2LFDEQhoMo7rj6E5SAl_XQYz47afYgsn7Coh52zyGdVO9k6O60SXpl_70ZZvTgRSgoKJ56q3gQeknJlhLavt1vd-u02LLbMsLYltQi4hHaUMlZo3nHHqNNnbSNpkqdoWc57wmhVAr5FJ1xSVulO7FBNx9CLmF2BR-y4hjvgsMD2LImwHHA0wOMMXg8Q1xGmyf8K5QdLhf3l5QuVL65xN9uf3QaJ7Ap2fkOJpjLc_RksGOGF6d-jm4_fby5-tJcf__89er9deN4x0vTS-dZ54eu74lQUjhthSOcKe384AdFlNSi1Rxa5bj11kmgimrGgPZDCx0_RxfH3CXFnyvkYqaQHYyjre-u2bCWdVy3VIiKvv4H3cc1zfW7SkkuhVJcV0oeKZdizgkGs6Qw2fRgKDEH7WZvTtrNQbshtcgh_dUpfe0n8H-3_niuwLsjAFXHfYBksgswO_AhgSvGx_CfE78BgdSU5A</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2653547738</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Distinct pathologic feature of myeloid neoplasm with t(v;11p15); NUP98 rearrangement</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals Complete</source><creator>Lauw, Marietya I.S. ; Qi, Zhongxia ; Eversmeyer, Lauren ; Prakash, Sonam ; Wen, Kwun Wah ; Yu, Jingwei ; Monaghan, Sara A. ; Aggarwal, Nidhi ; Wang, Linlin</creator><creatorcontrib>Lauw, Marietya I.S. ; Qi, Zhongxia ; Eversmeyer, Lauren ; Prakash, Sonam ; Wen, Kwun Wah ; Yu, Jingwei ; Monaghan, Sara A. ; Aggarwal, Nidhi ; Wang, Linlin</creatorcontrib><description>Chromosome rearrangements involving NUP98 at 11p15 are rare but recurring abnormalities in acute myeloid leukemia (AML). Here we described 12 cases of myeloid neoplasms with t(v; 11p15); NUP98 rearrangement and characterized their pathologic features. Our patient cohort included 10 adults and 2 children with a median age of 51 years. They were predominantly AML (n = 10) including de novo AML, therapy-related AML, chronic myeloid leukemia with myeloid blast crisis, and mixed phenotype acute leukemia, as well as therapy-related myelodysplastic syndrome (MDS) and MDS/myeloproliferative neoplasm with increased blasts. The blasts shared some common features including pink/red cytoplasmic granules, presence of a perinuclear hof, Auer rods, and occasional bilobed nuclei, mimicking acute promyelocytic leukemia (APML). Flow cytometric studies showed blasts positive for MPO, CD117, CD13 and CD33, with a subset of cases negative for CD34 and/or HLA-DR and a subset of cases expressing monocytic markers. The translocations of 11p15 included t(7; 11) (p15; p15), t(2; 11) (q31; p15), t(9; 11) (p22; p15), t(5; 11) (q32; p15), and t(11; 12) (p15; q13). Three cases showed cryptic NUP98 rearrangement. These patients showed incomplete response to therapy with median overall survival of 17.5 months, a complete remission rate of 25% following chemotherapy induction and primary refractory disease of 58%. It is clinically important to recognize this group of diseases because the blasts can be misclassified as promyelocytes, and NUP98 rearrangement may be cryptic requiring fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) study. This case series highlights that NUP98-rearranged myeloid neoplasms are clinically, morphologically, and cytogenetically distinct and could be considered as a separate entity in the WHO classification defined by cytogenetic abnormality. •AML with NUP98 rearrangement mimic acute promyelocytic leukemia.•NUP98 rearrangement may be cryptic.•AML with NUP98 shows incomplete response to treatment.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0046-8177</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1532-8392</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.humpath.2022.02.004</identifier><identifier>PMID: 35167894</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>United States: Elsevier Inc</publisher><subject>Bone marrow ; Chemotherapy ; Chromosome Aberrations ; Chromosomes ; Flow cytometry ; Genes ; Humans ; In Situ Hybridization, Fluorescence ; Laboratories ; Leukemia ; Leukemia, Myeloid, Acute - genetics ; Lymphoma ; Middle Aged ; Morphology ; Myelodysplastic syndromes ; Myeloid neoplasm ; Myeloproliferative Disorders - genetics ; Nuclear Pore Complex Proteins - genetics ; NUP98 FISH ; NUP98 rearrangement ; Patients ; Pediatrics ; Remission (Medicine) ; t(v;11p15) ; Translocation, Genetic ; Tumors</subject><ispartof>Human pathology, 2022-05, Vol.123, p.11-19</ispartof><rights>2022 Elsevier Inc.</rights><rights>Copyright © 2022 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.</rights><rights>2022. Elsevier Inc.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c393t-b5cd29df9bb04754c8a4c03278cdfdf707584683e67c3adac5e171822e1bf6e93</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c393t-b5cd29df9bb04754c8a4c03278cdfdf707584683e67c3adac5e171822e1bf6e93</cites><orcidid>0000-0003-1514-1044 ; 0000-0002-7296-3012 ; 0000-0001-5967-5190 ; 0000-0002-6299-9708 ; 0000-0001-5638-999X</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0046817722000326$$EHTML$$P50$$Gelsevier$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,3537,27901,27902,65306</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35167894$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Lauw, Marietya I.S.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Qi, Zhongxia</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Eversmeyer, Lauren</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Prakash, Sonam</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wen, Kwun Wah</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Yu, Jingwei</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Monaghan, Sara A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Aggarwal, Nidhi</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wang, Linlin</creatorcontrib><title>Distinct pathologic feature of myeloid neoplasm with t(v;11p15); NUP98 rearrangement</title><title>Human pathology</title><addtitle>Hum Pathol</addtitle><description>Chromosome rearrangements involving NUP98 at 11p15 are rare but recurring abnormalities in acute myeloid leukemia (AML). Here we described 12 cases of myeloid neoplasms with t(v; 11p15); NUP98 rearrangement and characterized their pathologic features. Our patient cohort included 10 adults and 2 children with a median age of 51 years. They were predominantly AML (n = 10) including de novo AML, therapy-related AML, chronic myeloid leukemia with myeloid blast crisis, and mixed phenotype acute leukemia, as well as therapy-related myelodysplastic syndrome (MDS) and MDS/myeloproliferative neoplasm with increased blasts. The blasts shared some common features including pink/red cytoplasmic granules, presence of a perinuclear hof, Auer rods, and occasional bilobed nuclei, mimicking acute promyelocytic leukemia (APML). Flow cytometric studies showed blasts positive for MPO, CD117, CD13 and CD33, with a subset of cases negative for CD34 and/or HLA-DR and a subset of cases expressing monocytic markers. The translocations of 11p15 included t(7; 11) (p15; p15), t(2; 11) (q31; p15), t(9; 11) (p22; p15), t(5; 11) (q32; p15), and t(11; 12) (p15; q13). Three cases showed cryptic NUP98 rearrangement. These patients showed incomplete response to therapy with median overall survival of 17.5 months, a complete remission rate of 25% following chemotherapy induction and primary refractory disease of 58%. It is clinically important to recognize this group of diseases because the blasts can be misclassified as promyelocytes, and NUP98 rearrangement may be cryptic requiring fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) study. This case series highlights that NUP98-rearranged myeloid neoplasms are clinically, morphologically, and cytogenetically distinct and could be considered as a separate entity in the WHO classification defined by cytogenetic abnormality. •AML with NUP98 rearrangement mimic acute promyelocytic leukemia.•NUP98 rearrangement may be cryptic.•AML with NUP98 shows incomplete response to treatment.</description><subject>Bone marrow</subject><subject>Chemotherapy</subject><subject>Chromosome Aberrations</subject><subject>Chromosomes</subject><subject>Flow cytometry</subject><subject>Genes</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>In Situ Hybridization, Fluorescence</subject><subject>Laboratories</subject><subject>Leukemia</subject><subject>Leukemia, Myeloid, Acute - genetics</subject><subject>Lymphoma</subject><subject>Middle Aged</subject><subject>Morphology</subject><subject>Myelodysplastic syndromes</subject><subject>Myeloid neoplasm</subject><subject>Myeloproliferative Disorders - genetics</subject><subject>Nuclear Pore Complex Proteins - genetics</subject><subject>NUP98 FISH</subject><subject>NUP98 rearrangement</subject><subject>Patients</subject><subject>Pediatrics</subject><subject>Remission (Medicine)</subject><subject>t(v;11p15)</subject><subject>Translocation, Genetic</subject><subject>Tumors</subject><issn>0046-8177</issn><issn>1532-8392</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2022</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNqFkE2LFDEQhoMo7rj6E5SAl_XQYz47afYgsn7Coh52zyGdVO9k6O60SXpl_70ZZvTgRSgoKJ56q3gQeknJlhLavt1vd-u02LLbMsLYltQi4hHaUMlZo3nHHqNNnbSNpkqdoWc57wmhVAr5FJ1xSVulO7FBNx9CLmF2BR-y4hjvgsMD2LImwHHA0wOMMXg8Q1xGmyf8K5QdLhf3l5QuVL65xN9uf3QaJ7Ap2fkOJpjLc_RksGOGF6d-jm4_fby5-tJcf__89er9deN4x0vTS-dZ54eu74lQUjhthSOcKe384AdFlNSi1Rxa5bj11kmgimrGgPZDCx0_RxfH3CXFnyvkYqaQHYyjre-u2bCWdVy3VIiKvv4H3cc1zfW7SkkuhVJcV0oeKZdizgkGs6Qw2fRgKDEH7WZvTtrNQbshtcgh_dUpfe0n8H-3_niuwLsjAFXHfYBksgswO_AhgSvGx_CfE78BgdSU5A</recordid><startdate>202205</startdate><enddate>202205</enddate><creator>Lauw, Marietya I.S.</creator><creator>Qi, Zhongxia</creator><creator>Eversmeyer, Lauren</creator><creator>Prakash, Sonam</creator><creator>Wen, Kwun Wah</creator><creator>Yu, Jingwei</creator><creator>Monaghan, Sara A.</creator><creator>Aggarwal, Nidhi</creator><creator>Wang, Linlin</creator><general>Elsevier Inc</general><general>Elsevier Limited</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>7X8</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1514-1044</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7296-3012</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5967-5190</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6299-9708</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5638-999X</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>202205</creationdate><title>Distinct pathologic feature of myeloid neoplasm with t(v;11p15); NUP98 rearrangement</title><author>Lauw, Marietya I.S. ; Qi, Zhongxia ; Eversmeyer, Lauren ; Prakash, Sonam ; Wen, Kwun Wah ; Yu, Jingwei ; Monaghan, Sara A. ; Aggarwal, Nidhi ; Wang, Linlin</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c393t-b5cd29df9bb04754c8a4c03278cdfdf707584683e67c3adac5e171822e1bf6e93</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2022</creationdate><topic>Bone marrow</topic><topic>Chemotherapy</topic><topic>Chromosome Aberrations</topic><topic>Chromosomes</topic><topic>Flow cytometry</topic><topic>Genes</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>In Situ Hybridization, Fluorescence</topic><topic>Laboratories</topic><topic>Leukemia</topic><topic>Leukemia, Myeloid, Acute - genetics</topic><topic>Lymphoma</topic><topic>Middle Aged</topic><topic>Morphology</topic><topic>Myelodysplastic syndromes</topic><topic>Myeloid neoplasm</topic><topic>Myeloproliferative Disorders - genetics</topic><topic>Nuclear Pore Complex Proteins - genetics</topic><topic>NUP98 FISH</topic><topic>NUP98 rearrangement</topic><topic>Patients</topic><topic>Pediatrics</topic><topic>Remission (Medicine)</topic><topic>t(v;11p15)</topic><topic>Translocation, Genetic</topic><topic>Tumors</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Lauw, Marietya I.S.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Qi, Zhongxia</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Eversmeyer, Lauren</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Prakash, Sonam</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wen, Kwun Wah</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Yu, Jingwei</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Monaghan, Sara A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Aggarwal, Nidhi</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wang, Linlin</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Health &amp; Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Human pathology</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Lauw, Marietya I.S.</au><au>Qi, Zhongxia</au><au>Eversmeyer, Lauren</au><au>Prakash, Sonam</au><au>Wen, Kwun Wah</au><au>Yu, Jingwei</au><au>Monaghan, Sara A.</au><au>Aggarwal, Nidhi</au><au>Wang, Linlin</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Distinct pathologic feature of myeloid neoplasm with t(v;11p15); NUP98 rearrangement</atitle><jtitle>Human pathology</jtitle><addtitle>Hum Pathol</addtitle><date>2022-05</date><risdate>2022</risdate><volume>123</volume><spage>11</spage><epage>19</epage><pages>11-19</pages><issn>0046-8177</issn><eissn>1532-8392</eissn><abstract>Chromosome rearrangements involving NUP98 at 11p15 are rare but recurring abnormalities in acute myeloid leukemia (AML). Here we described 12 cases of myeloid neoplasms with t(v; 11p15); NUP98 rearrangement and characterized their pathologic features. Our patient cohort included 10 adults and 2 children with a median age of 51 years. They were predominantly AML (n = 10) including de novo AML, therapy-related AML, chronic myeloid leukemia with myeloid blast crisis, and mixed phenotype acute leukemia, as well as therapy-related myelodysplastic syndrome (MDS) and MDS/myeloproliferative neoplasm with increased blasts. The blasts shared some common features including pink/red cytoplasmic granules, presence of a perinuclear hof, Auer rods, and occasional bilobed nuclei, mimicking acute promyelocytic leukemia (APML). Flow cytometric studies showed blasts positive for MPO, CD117, CD13 and CD33, with a subset of cases negative for CD34 and/or HLA-DR and a subset of cases expressing monocytic markers. The translocations of 11p15 included t(7; 11) (p15; p15), t(2; 11) (q31; p15), t(9; 11) (p22; p15), t(5; 11) (q32; p15), and t(11; 12) (p15; q13). Three cases showed cryptic NUP98 rearrangement. These patients showed incomplete response to therapy with median overall survival of 17.5 months, a complete remission rate of 25% following chemotherapy induction and primary refractory disease of 58%. It is clinically important to recognize this group of diseases because the blasts can be misclassified as promyelocytes, and NUP98 rearrangement may be cryptic requiring fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) study. This case series highlights that NUP98-rearranged myeloid neoplasms are clinically, morphologically, and cytogenetically distinct and could be considered as a separate entity in the WHO classification defined by cytogenetic abnormality. •AML with NUP98 rearrangement mimic acute promyelocytic leukemia.•NUP98 rearrangement may be cryptic.•AML with NUP98 shows incomplete response to treatment.</abstract><cop>United States</cop><pub>Elsevier Inc</pub><pmid>35167894</pmid><doi>10.1016/j.humpath.2022.02.004</doi><tpages>9</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1514-1044</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7296-3012</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5967-5190</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6299-9708</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5638-999X</orcidid></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0046-8177
ispartof Human pathology, 2022-05, Vol.123, p.11-19
issn 0046-8177
1532-8392
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2629386144
source MEDLINE; Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals Complete
subjects Bone marrow
Chemotherapy
Chromosome Aberrations
Chromosomes
Flow cytometry
Genes
Humans
In Situ Hybridization, Fluorescence
Laboratories
Leukemia
Leukemia, Myeloid, Acute - genetics
Lymphoma
Middle Aged
Morphology
Myelodysplastic syndromes
Myeloid neoplasm
Myeloproliferative Disorders - genetics
Nuclear Pore Complex Proteins - genetics
NUP98 FISH
NUP98 rearrangement
Patients
Pediatrics
Remission (Medicine)
t(v
11p15)
Translocation, Genetic
Tumors
title Distinct pathologic feature of myeloid neoplasm with t(v;11p15); NUP98 rearrangement
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-10T14%3A39%3A15IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Distinct%20pathologic%20feature%20of%20myeloid%20neoplasm%20with%20t(v;11p15);%20NUP98%20rearrangement&rft.jtitle=Human%20pathology&rft.au=Lauw,%20Marietya%20I.S.&rft.date=2022-05&rft.volume=123&rft.spage=11&rft.epage=19&rft.pages=11-19&rft.issn=0046-8177&rft.eissn=1532-8392&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.humpath.2022.02.004&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2629386144%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2653547738&rft_id=info:pmid/35167894&rft_els_id=S0046817722000326&rfr_iscdi=true