Retention decisions and protocols among orthodontists practicing in Canada: A cross-sectional survey

This study aimed to survey retention protocols and retainer characteristics among orthodontists practicing in Canada. An online questionnaire was distributed to 576 orthodontists registered with the Canadian Association of Orthodontists. It included respondents’ demographic details, preferred orthod...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:American journal of orthodontics and dentofacial orthopedics 2022-07, Vol.162 (1), p.51-57
Hauptverfasser: Carneiro, Natália Cristina Ruy, Nóbrega, Marina Tavares Costa, Meade, Maurice J., Flores-Mir, Carlos
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 57
container_issue 1
container_start_page 51
container_title American journal of orthodontics and dentofacial orthopedics
container_volume 162
creator Carneiro, Natália Cristina Ruy
Nóbrega, Marina Tavares Costa
Meade, Maurice J.
Flores-Mir, Carlos
description This study aimed to survey retention protocols and retainer characteristics among orthodontists practicing in Canada. An online questionnaire was distributed to 576 orthodontists registered with the Canadian Association of Orthodontists. It included respondents’ demographic details, preferred orthodontic retainers and prescribed wear protocol, adjunctive retention procedures, the timing of retention follow-ups, retainer choice in specific situations, and retainer characteristics. Chi-square tests and Fisher’s exact tests were used to test the associations between variables. An 18% response rate was recorded (n = 101). Vacuum-formed retainers were the most commonly used retainers in the maxilla (50.5%), whereas bonded retainers were preferred in the mandible (54.5%). An initial full-time removable retainer wear period was commonly prescribed (63.0%-67.0%). Retainer checks were carried out by 85.1%-89.1% of orthodontists for 1 or 2 years after the end of active orthodontic treatment. Only 44.6%-56.4% were comfortable with general dentists continuing retainer checks. Most (72.5%-84.1%) retainers were fabricated in the orthodontists’ office laboratory. Indefinite retainer wear was commonly suggested and was significantly influenced by the number of years in practice. Most orthodontists’ preferred retainer was the vacuum-formed retainers in the maxilla and the bonded retainers in the mandible. A variety of retention protocols and retainer characteristics was evident among orthodontists that reflect the considerable variation in malocclusion traits we face day-to-day. There seems to be a potential dichotomy between orthodontists being uncomfortable about allowing general dental practitioners to manage retention and orthodontists unwilling to provide retention care indefinitely. •Retention protocols and retainer choices of orthodontists in Canada varied widely.•Vacuum formed retainers were the most commonly chosen retainer in the maxilla.•Bonded retainers were the preferred choice in the mandible.•More experienced orthodontists were less likely to recommend indefinite retention.•Orthodontists expressed unease regarding the role of GDPs in managing retention.
doi_str_mv 10.1016/j.ajodo.2021.02.022
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2628705535</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S0889540622000567</els_id><sourcerecordid>2628705535</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3106-39d6780d408d261b63f31c5965628b87517eb92d531d5ff09cc0e29a82de50683</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9UNtKAzEQDaLYWv0CQfbRl62TpMnuCj5I8QYFQfQ5pMmspmw3NdkW-jd-i19metFHYWAmzJlzTg4h5xSGFKi8mg31zFs_ZMDoEFgqdkD6FKoil4Vgh6QPZVnlYgSyR05inAFANWJwTHpcUMEpFX2CL9hh2znfZhaNi2mImW5ttgi-88Y36TX37XvmQ_eR1BI0djFttemccWnh2mysW231dXb7_WWCjzGPaDaUusniMqxwfUqOat1EPNv3AXm7v3sdP-aT54en8e0kN5yCzHllZVGCHUFpmaRTyWtOjaikkKycloWgBU4rZpN3K-oaKmMAWaVLZlGALPmAXO54k_vPJcZOzV002DS6Rb-MiiWeAoTgIkH5Drp1HLBWi-DmOqwVBbXJV83UNl-1yVcBS8XS1cVeYDmdo_27-Q00AW52AEzfXDkMKhqHrUHrQgpFWe_-FfgBgT2OEA</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2628705535</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Retention decisions and protocols among orthodontists practicing in Canada: A cross-sectional survey</title><source>Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals Complete</source><creator>Carneiro, Natália Cristina Ruy ; Nóbrega, Marina Tavares Costa ; Meade, Maurice J. ; Flores-Mir, Carlos</creator><creatorcontrib>Carneiro, Natália Cristina Ruy ; Nóbrega, Marina Tavares Costa ; Meade, Maurice J. ; Flores-Mir, Carlos</creatorcontrib><description>This study aimed to survey retention protocols and retainer characteristics among orthodontists practicing in Canada. An online questionnaire was distributed to 576 orthodontists registered with the Canadian Association of Orthodontists. It included respondents’ demographic details, preferred orthodontic retainers and prescribed wear protocol, adjunctive retention procedures, the timing of retention follow-ups, retainer choice in specific situations, and retainer characteristics. Chi-square tests and Fisher’s exact tests were used to test the associations between variables. An 18% response rate was recorded (n = 101). Vacuum-formed retainers were the most commonly used retainers in the maxilla (50.5%), whereas bonded retainers were preferred in the mandible (54.5%). An initial full-time removable retainer wear period was commonly prescribed (63.0%-67.0%). Retainer checks were carried out by 85.1%-89.1% of orthodontists for 1 or 2 years after the end of active orthodontic treatment. Only 44.6%-56.4% were comfortable with general dentists continuing retainer checks. Most (72.5%-84.1%) retainers were fabricated in the orthodontists’ office laboratory. Indefinite retainer wear was commonly suggested and was significantly influenced by the number of years in practice. Most orthodontists’ preferred retainer was the vacuum-formed retainers in the maxilla and the bonded retainers in the mandible. A variety of retention protocols and retainer characteristics was evident among orthodontists that reflect the considerable variation in malocclusion traits we face day-to-day. There seems to be a potential dichotomy between orthodontists being uncomfortable about allowing general dental practitioners to manage retention and orthodontists unwilling to provide retention care indefinitely. •Retention protocols and retainer choices of orthodontists in Canada varied widely.•Vacuum formed retainers were the most commonly chosen retainer in the maxilla.•Bonded retainers were the preferred choice in the mandible.•More experienced orthodontists were less likely to recommend indefinite retention.•Orthodontists expressed unease regarding the role of GDPs in managing retention.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0889-5406</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1097-6752</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.ajodo.2021.02.022</identifier><identifier>PMID: 35153115</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>United States: Elsevier Inc</publisher><ispartof>American journal of orthodontics and dentofacial orthopedics, 2022-07, Vol.162 (1), p.51-57</ispartof><rights>2022 American Association of Orthodontists</rights><rights>Copyright © 2022 American Association of Orthodontists. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3106-39d6780d408d261b63f31c5965628b87517eb92d531d5ff09cc0e29a82de50683</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3106-39d6780d408d261b63f31c5965628b87517eb92d531d5ff09cc0e29a82de50683</cites><orcidid>0000-0001-5688-1079</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ajodo.2021.02.022$$EHTML$$P50$$Gelsevier$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,3550,27924,27925,45995</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35153115$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Carneiro, Natália Cristina Ruy</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Nóbrega, Marina Tavares Costa</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Meade, Maurice J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Flores-Mir, Carlos</creatorcontrib><title>Retention decisions and protocols among orthodontists practicing in Canada: A cross-sectional survey</title><title>American journal of orthodontics and dentofacial orthopedics</title><addtitle>Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop</addtitle><description>This study aimed to survey retention protocols and retainer characteristics among orthodontists practicing in Canada. An online questionnaire was distributed to 576 orthodontists registered with the Canadian Association of Orthodontists. It included respondents’ demographic details, preferred orthodontic retainers and prescribed wear protocol, adjunctive retention procedures, the timing of retention follow-ups, retainer choice in specific situations, and retainer characteristics. Chi-square tests and Fisher’s exact tests were used to test the associations between variables. An 18% response rate was recorded (n = 101). Vacuum-formed retainers were the most commonly used retainers in the maxilla (50.5%), whereas bonded retainers were preferred in the mandible (54.5%). An initial full-time removable retainer wear period was commonly prescribed (63.0%-67.0%). Retainer checks were carried out by 85.1%-89.1% of orthodontists for 1 or 2 years after the end of active orthodontic treatment. Only 44.6%-56.4% were comfortable with general dentists continuing retainer checks. Most (72.5%-84.1%) retainers were fabricated in the orthodontists’ office laboratory. Indefinite retainer wear was commonly suggested and was significantly influenced by the number of years in practice. Most orthodontists’ preferred retainer was the vacuum-formed retainers in the maxilla and the bonded retainers in the mandible. A variety of retention protocols and retainer characteristics was evident among orthodontists that reflect the considerable variation in malocclusion traits we face day-to-day. There seems to be a potential dichotomy between orthodontists being uncomfortable about allowing general dental practitioners to manage retention and orthodontists unwilling to provide retention care indefinitely. •Retention protocols and retainer choices of orthodontists in Canada varied widely.•Vacuum formed retainers were the most commonly chosen retainer in the maxilla.•Bonded retainers were the preferred choice in the mandible.•More experienced orthodontists were less likely to recommend indefinite retention.•Orthodontists expressed unease regarding the role of GDPs in managing retention.</description><issn>0889-5406</issn><issn>1097-6752</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2022</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNp9UNtKAzEQDaLYWv0CQfbRl62TpMnuCj5I8QYFQfQ5pMmspmw3NdkW-jd-i19metFHYWAmzJlzTg4h5xSGFKi8mg31zFs_ZMDoEFgqdkD6FKoil4Vgh6QPZVnlYgSyR05inAFANWJwTHpcUMEpFX2CL9hh2znfZhaNi2mImW5ttgi-88Y36TX37XvmQ_eR1BI0djFttemccWnh2mysW231dXb7_WWCjzGPaDaUusniMqxwfUqOat1EPNv3AXm7v3sdP-aT54en8e0kN5yCzHllZVGCHUFpmaRTyWtOjaikkKycloWgBU4rZpN3K-oaKmMAWaVLZlGALPmAXO54k_vPJcZOzV002DS6Rb-MiiWeAoTgIkH5Drp1HLBWi-DmOqwVBbXJV83UNl-1yVcBS8XS1cVeYDmdo_27-Q00AW52AEzfXDkMKhqHrUHrQgpFWe_-FfgBgT2OEA</recordid><startdate>20220701</startdate><enddate>20220701</enddate><creator>Carneiro, Natália Cristina Ruy</creator><creator>Nóbrega, Marina Tavares Costa</creator><creator>Meade, Maurice J.</creator><creator>Flores-Mir, Carlos</creator><general>Elsevier Inc</general><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5688-1079</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20220701</creationdate><title>Retention decisions and protocols among orthodontists practicing in Canada: A cross-sectional survey</title><author>Carneiro, Natália Cristina Ruy ; Nóbrega, Marina Tavares Costa ; Meade, Maurice J. ; Flores-Mir, Carlos</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c3106-39d6780d408d261b63f31c5965628b87517eb92d531d5ff09cc0e29a82de50683</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2022</creationdate><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Carneiro, Natália Cristina Ruy</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Nóbrega, Marina Tavares Costa</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Meade, Maurice J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Flores-Mir, Carlos</creatorcontrib><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>American journal of orthodontics and dentofacial orthopedics</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Carneiro, Natália Cristina Ruy</au><au>Nóbrega, Marina Tavares Costa</au><au>Meade, Maurice J.</au><au>Flores-Mir, Carlos</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Retention decisions and protocols among orthodontists practicing in Canada: A cross-sectional survey</atitle><jtitle>American journal of orthodontics and dentofacial orthopedics</jtitle><addtitle>Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop</addtitle><date>2022-07-01</date><risdate>2022</risdate><volume>162</volume><issue>1</issue><spage>51</spage><epage>57</epage><pages>51-57</pages><issn>0889-5406</issn><eissn>1097-6752</eissn><abstract>This study aimed to survey retention protocols and retainer characteristics among orthodontists practicing in Canada. An online questionnaire was distributed to 576 orthodontists registered with the Canadian Association of Orthodontists. It included respondents’ demographic details, preferred orthodontic retainers and prescribed wear protocol, adjunctive retention procedures, the timing of retention follow-ups, retainer choice in specific situations, and retainer characteristics. Chi-square tests and Fisher’s exact tests were used to test the associations between variables. An 18% response rate was recorded (n = 101). Vacuum-formed retainers were the most commonly used retainers in the maxilla (50.5%), whereas bonded retainers were preferred in the mandible (54.5%). An initial full-time removable retainer wear period was commonly prescribed (63.0%-67.0%). Retainer checks were carried out by 85.1%-89.1% of orthodontists for 1 or 2 years after the end of active orthodontic treatment. Only 44.6%-56.4% were comfortable with general dentists continuing retainer checks. Most (72.5%-84.1%) retainers were fabricated in the orthodontists’ office laboratory. Indefinite retainer wear was commonly suggested and was significantly influenced by the number of years in practice. Most orthodontists’ preferred retainer was the vacuum-formed retainers in the maxilla and the bonded retainers in the mandible. A variety of retention protocols and retainer characteristics was evident among orthodontists that reflect the considerable variation in malocclusion traits we face day-to-day. There seems to be a potential dichotomy between orthodontists being uncomfortable about allowing general dental practitioners to manage retention and orthodontists unwilling to provide retention care indefinitely. •Retention protocols and retainer choices of orthodontists in Canada varied widely.•Vacuum formed retainers were the most commonly chosen retainer in the maxilla.•Bonded retainers were the preferred choice in the mandible.•More experienced orthodontists were less likely to recommend indefinite retention.•Orthodontists expressed unease regarding the role of GDPs in managing retention.</abstract><cop>United States</cop><pub>Elsevier Inc</pub><pmid>35153115</pmid><doi>10.1016/j.ajodo.2021.02.022</doi><tpages>7</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5688-1079</orcidid></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0889-5406
ispartof American journal of orthodontics and dentofacial orthopedics, 2022-07, Vol.162 (1), p.51-57
issn 0889-5406
1097-6752
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2628705535
source Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals Complete
title Retention decisions and protocols among orthodontists practicing in Canada: A cross-sectional survey
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-05T14%3A42%3A49IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Retention%20decisions%20and%20protocols%20among%20orthodontists%20practicing%20in%20Canada:%20A%C2%A0cross-sectional%20survey&rft.jtitle=American%20journal%20of%20orthodontics%20and%20dentofacial%20orthopedics&rft.au=Carneiro,%20Nat%C3%A1lia%20Cristina%20Ruy&rft.date=2022-07-01&rft.volume=162&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=51&rft.epage=57&rft.pages=51-57&rft.issn=0889-5406&rft.eissn=1097-6752&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.ajodo.2021.02.022&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2628705535%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2628705535&rft_id=info:pmid/35153115&rft_els_id=S0889540622000567&rfr_iscdi=true