Faculty and Resident Contraceptive Opt Outs and Training Site Restrictions: A CERA Study

Contraception is a core component of family medicine residency curriculum. Institutional environments can influence residents' access to contraceptive training and thus their ability to meet the reproductive health needs of their patients. Contraceptive training questions were included in the 2...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Family medicine 2022-02, Vol.54 (2), p.123-128
Hauptverfasser: Shih, Grace, Stulberg, Debra, Barreto, Tyler W, Andrilla, C Holly A, Guzman, Suzette, Nothnagle, Melissa
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 128
container_issue 2
container_start_page 123
container_title Family medicine
container_volume 54
creator Shih, Grace
Stulberg, Debra
Barreto, Tyler W
Andrilla, C Holly A
Guzman, Suzette
Nothnagle, Melissa
description Contraception is a core component of family medicine residency curriculum. Institutional environments can influence residents' access to contraceptive training and thus their ability to meet the reproductive health needs of their patients. Contraceptive training questions were included in the 2020 Council of Academic Family Medicine Educational Research Alliance (CERA) survey of family medicine residency program directors. The survey asked how many faculty and residents opt out of providing contraceptive methods for moral or religious reasons, and whether training sites have institutional restrictions on contraception. We performed descriptive statistics and regression to identify program characteristics associated with having a resident or faculty opt out of providing contraceptive care. Of 626 program directors, 249 responded to the survey, and 237 answered the contraceptive questions. Percentages of program directors reporting any residents or faculty who opted out of contraceptive services are as follows: pill/patch/ring (residents 27%; faculty 17%), emergency contraception (residents 40%, faculty 33%), or intrauterine devices/implants (resident 29%; faculty 23%). Programs in the South (OR 2.78; 1.19-6.49) and those with Catholic affiliation (OR 2.35; 1.23-4.91) had higher adjusted odds of at least one opt-out faculty but were not associated with having opt-out residents. Eleven percent of programs had at least one training site with institutional restrictions on contraception. To ensure that residents have access to adequate contraceptive training, residencies should proactively seek faculty and training environments that meet residents' needs, and should make limitations on services clear to potential residents and patients.
doi_str_mv 10.22454/FamMed.2022.410546
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2628301521</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2628301521</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c300t-7f989c5a7dac3344b9b52935df11d13f92ec5b1593859351a2c1ae920fe493833</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNo1kE1LAzEQhoMotlZ_gSA5etmaTJLurrdSWhUqhbaCt5DNZiWyXyZZof_ebbcehoGZ952PB6F7SqYAXPCnlareTT4FAjDllAg-u0BjmrIkYgkhl2hMYg4RAxAjdOP9NyEQx4xcoxETlLNZwsfoc6V0V4YDVnWOt8bb3NQBL5o6OKVNG-yvwZs24E0X_Emzd8rWtv7COxvM0RGc1cE2tX_Gc7xYbud4F7r8cIuuClV6c3fOE_SxWu4Xr9F68_K2mK8jzQgJUVykSaqFinOlGeM8SzMBKRN5QWlOWZGC0SKjov-qD0EVaKpMCqQwvK8xNkGPw9zWNT9df46srNemLFVtms5LmEHCCBVAeykbpNo13jtTyNbZSrmDpESekMoBqTwilQPS3vVwXtBlVd_79_wzZH9_w3F1</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2628301521</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Faculty and Resident Contraceptive Opt Outs and Training Site Restrictions: A CERA Study</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals</source><creator>Shih, Grace ; Stulberg, Debra ; Barreto, Tyler W ; Andrilla, C Holly A ; Guzman, Suzette ; Nothnagle, Melissa</creator><creatorcontrib>Shih, Grace ; Stulberg, Debra ; Barreto, Tyler W ; Andrilla, C Holly A ; Guzman, Suzette ; Nothnagle, Melissa</creatorcontrib><description>Contraception is a core component of family medicine residency curriculum. Institutional environments can influence residents' access to contraceptive training and thus their ability to meet the reproductive health needs of their patients. Contraceptive training questions were included in the 2020 Council of Academic Family Medicine Educational Research Alliance (CERA) survey of family medicine residency program directors. The survey asked how many faculty and residents opt out of providing contraceptive methods for moral or religious reasons, and whether training sites have institutional restrictions on contraception. We performed descriptive statistics and regression to identify program characteristics associated with having a resident or faculty opt out of providing contraceptive care. Of 626 program directors, 249 responded to the survey, and 237 answered the contraceptive questions. Percentages of program directors reporting any residents or faculty who opted out of contraceptive services are as follows: pill/patch/ring (residents 27%; faculty 17%), emergency contraception (residents 40%, faculty 33%), or intrauterine devices/implants (resident 29%; faculty 23%). Programs in the South (OR 2.78; 1.19-6.49) and those with Catholic affiliation (OR 2.35; 1.23-4.91) had higher adjusted odds of at least one opt-out faculty but were not associated with having opt-out residents. Eleven percent of programs had at least one training site with institutional restrictions on contraception. To ensure that residents have access to adequate contraceptive training, residencies should proactively seek faculty and training environments that meet residents' needs, and should make limitations on services clear to potential residents and patients.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0742-3225</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1938-3800</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.22454/FamMed.2022.410546</identifier><identifier>PMID: 35143684</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>United States</publisher><subject>Contraceptive Agents ; Curriculum ; Faculty ; Family Practice - education ; Female ; Humans ; Internship and Residency ; Surveys and Questionnaires</subject><ispartof>Family medicine, 2022-02, Vol.54 (2), p.123-128</ispartof><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,27901,27902</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35143684$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Shih, Grace</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Stulberg, Debra</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Barreto, Tyler W</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Andrilla, C Holly A</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Guzman, Suzette</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Nothnagle, Melissa</creatorcontrib><title>Faculty and Resident Contraceptive Opt Outs and Training Site Restrictions: A CERA Study</title><title>Family medicine</title><addtitle>Fam Med</addtitle><description>Contraception is a core component of family medicine residency curriculum. Institutional environments can influence residents' access to contraceptive training and thus their ability to meet the reproductive health needs of their patients. Contraceptive training questions were included in the 2020 Council of Academic Family Medicine Educational Research Alliance (CERA) survey of family medicine residency program directors. The survey asked how many faculty and residents opt out of providing contraceptive methods for moral or religious reasons, and whether training sites have institutional restrictions on contraception. We performed descriptive statistics and regression to identify program characteristics associated with having a resident or faculty opt out of providing contraceptive care. Of 626 program directors, 249 responded to the survey, and 237 answered the contraceptive questions. Percentages of program directors reporting any residents or faculty who opted out of contraceptive services are as follows: pill/patch/ring (residents 27%; faculty 17%), emergency contraception (residents 40%, faculty 33%), or intrauterine devices/implants (resident 29%; faculty 23%). Programs in the South (OR 2.78; 1.19-6.49) and those with Catholic affiliation (OR 2.35; 1.23-4.91) had higher adjusted odds of at least one opt-out faculty but were not associated with having opt-out residents. Eleven percent of programs had at least one training site with institutional restrictions on contraception. To ensure that residents have access to adequate contraceptive training, residencies should proactively seek faculty and training environments that meet residents' needs, and should make limitations on services clear to potential residents and patients.</description><subject>Contraceptive Agents</subject><subject>Curriculum</subject><subject>Faculty</subject><subject>Family Practice - education</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Internship and Residency</subject><subject>Surveys and Questionnaires</subject><issn>0742-3225</issn><issn>1938-3800</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2022</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNo1kE1LAzEQhoMotlZ_gSA5etmaTJLurrdSWhUqhbaCt5DNZiWyXyZZof_ebbcehoGZ952PB6F7SqYAXPCnlareTT4FAjDllAg-u0BjmrIkYgkhl2hMYg4RAxAjdOP9NyEQx4xcoxETlLNZwsfoc6V0V4YDVnWOt8bb3NQBL5o6OKVNG-yvwZs24E0X_Emzd8rWtv7COxvM0RGc1cE2tX_Gc7xYbud4F7r8cIuuClV6c3fOE_SxWu4Xr9F68_K2mK8jzQgJUVykSaqFinOlGeM8SzMBKRN5QWlOWZGC0SKjov-qD0EVaKpMCqQwvK8xNkGPw9zWNT9df46srNemLFVtms5LmEHCCBVAeykbpNo13jtTyNbZSrmDpESekMoBqTwilQPS3vVwXtBlVd_79_wzZH9_w3F1</recordid><startdate>202202</startdate><enddate>202202</enddate><creator>Shih, Grace</creator><creator>Stulberg, Debra</creator><creator>Barreto, Tyler W</creator><creator>Andrilla, C Holly A</creator><creator>Guzman, Suzette</creator><creator>Nothnagle, Melissa</creator><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>202202</creationdate><title>Faculty and Resident Contraceptive Opt Outs and Training Site Restrictions: A CERA Study</title><author>Shih, Grace ; Stulberg, Debra ; Barreto, Tyler W ; Andrilla, C Holly A ; Guzman, Suzette ; Nothnagle, Melissa</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c300t-7f989c5a7dac3344b9b52935df11d13f92ec5b1593859351a2c1ae920fe493833</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2022</creationdate><topic>Contraceptive Agents</topic><topic>Curriculum</topic><topic>Faculty</topic><topic>Family Practice - education</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Internship and Residency</topic><topic>Surveys and Questionnaires</topic><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Shih, Grace</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Stulberg, Debra</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Barreto, Tyler W</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Andrilla, C Holly A</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Guzman, Suzette</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Nothnagle, Melissa</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Family medicine</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Shih, Grace</au><au>Stulberg, Debra</au><au>Barreto, Tyler W</au><au>Andrilla, C Holly A</au><au>Guzman, Suzette</au><au>Nothnagle, Melissa</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Faculty and Resident Contraceptive Opt Outs and Training Site Restrictions: A CERA Study</atitle><jtitle>Family medicine</jtitle><addtitle>Fam Med</addtitle><date>2022-02</date><risdate>2022</risdate><volume>54</volume><issue>2</issue><spage>123</spage><epage>128</epage><pages>123-128</pages><issn>0742-3225</issn><eissn>1938-3800</eissn><abstract>Contraception is a core component of family medicine residency curriculum. Institutional environments can influence residents' access to contraceptive training and thus their ability to meet the reproductive health needs of their patients. Contraceptive training questions were included in the 2020 Council of Academic Family Medicine Educational Research Alliance (CERA) survey of family medicine residency program directors. The survey asked how many faculty and residents opt out of providing contraceptive methods for moral or religious reasons, and whether training sites have institutional restrictions on contraception. We performed descriptive statistics and regression to identify program characteristics associated with having a resident or faculty opt out of providing contraceptive care. Of 626 program directors, 249 responded to the survey, and 237 answered the contraceptive questions. Percentages of program directors reporting any residents or faculty who opted out of contraceptive services are as follows: pill/patch/ring (residents 27%; faculty 17%), emergency contraception (residents 40%, faculty 33%), or intrauterine devices/implants (resident 29%; faculty 23%). Programs in the South (OR 2.78; 1.19-6.49) and those with Catholic affiliation (OR 2.35; 1.23-4.91) had higher adjusted odds of at least one opt-out faculty but were not associated with having opt-out residents. Eleven percent of programs had at least one training site with institutional restrictions on contraception. To ensure that residents have access to adequate contraceptive training, residencies should proactively seek faculty and training environments that meet residents' needs, and should make limitations on services clear to potential residents and patients.</abstract><cop>United States</cop><pmid>35143684</pmid><doi>10.22454/FamMed.2022.410546</doi><tpages>6</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0742-3225
ispartof Family medicine, 2022-02, Vol.54 (2), p.123-128
issn 0742-3225
1938-3800
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2628301521
source MEDLINE; EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals
subjects Contraceptive Agents
Curriculum
Faculty
Family Practice - education
Female
Humans
Internship and Residency
Surveys and Questionnaires
title Faculty and Resident Contraceptive Opt Outs and Training Site Restrictions: A CERA Study
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-29T05%3A30%3A05IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Faculty%20and%20Resident%20Contraceptive%20Opt%20Outs%20and%20Training%20Site%20Restrictions:%20A%20CERA%20Study&rft.jtitle=Family%20medicine&rft.au=Shih,%20Grace&rft.date=2022-02&rft.volume=54&rft.issue=2&rft.spage=123&rft.epage=128&rft.pages=123-128&rft.issn=0742-3225&rft.eissn=1938-3800&rft_id=info:doi/10.22454/FamMed.2022.410546&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2628301521%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2628301521&rft_id=info:pmid/35143684&rfr_iscdi=true