Preoperative imaging in primary hyperparathyroidism: Are 11 C-Choline PET/CT and 99m Tc-MIBI/ 123 Iodide subtraction SPECT/CT interchangeable or do they supplement each other?

Preoperative location of hyperfunctioning parathyroid glands (HPGs) is vital when planning minimally invasive surgery in patients with primary hyperparathyroidism (PHPT). Dual-isotope subtraction scintigraphy with Tc-MIBI/ Iodide using SPECT/CT and planar pinhole imaging (Di-SPECT) has shown high se...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Clinical endocrinology (Oxford) 2022-09, Vol.97 (3), p.258-267
Hauptverfasser: Christensen, Julie W, Ismail, Afefah, Søndergaard, Susanne B, Bennedbaek, Finn N, Nygaard, Birte, Jensen, Lars T, Trolle, Waldemar, Holst-Hahn, Christoffer, Zerahn, Bo, Kristensen, Bent, Krakauer, Martin
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 267
container_issue 3
container_start_page 258
container_title Clinical endocrinology (Oxford)
container_volume 97
creator Christensen, Julie W
Ismail, Afefah
Søndergaard, Susanne B
Bennedbaek, Finn N
Nygaard, Birte
Jensen, Lars T
Trolle, Waldemar
Holst-Hahn, Christoffer
Zerahn, Bo
Kristensen, Bent
Krakauer, Martin
description Preoperative location of hyperfunctioning parathyroid glands (HPGs) is vital when planning minimally invasive surgery in patients with primary hyperparathyroidism (PHPT). Dual-isotope subtraction scintigraphy with Tc-MIBI/ Iodide using SPECT/CT and planar pinhole imaging (Di-SPECT) has shown high sensitivity, but is challenged by high radiation dose, time consumption and cost. C-Choline PET/CT (faster with a lower radiation dose) is non-inferior to Di-SPECT. We aim to clarify to what extent the two are interchangeable and how often there are discrepancies. This is a prospective, GCP-controlled cohort study. One hundred patients diagnosed with PHPT were included and underwent both imaging modalities before parathyroidectomy. Clinical implications of differences between imaging findings and negative imaging results were assessed. Surgical findings confirmed by biochemistry and pathology served as reference standard. Among the 90 patients cured by parathyroidectomy, sensitivity was 82% (95% confidence interval [CI]: 74%-88%) and 87% (95% CI: 79%-92%) for Choline PET and Di-SPECT, respectively, p = .88. In seven cases at least one imaging modality found no HPG. Of these, neither modality found any true HPGs and only two were cured by surgery. When a positive finding in one modality was incorrect, the alternative modality was correct in approximately half of the cases. Choline PET and Di-SPECT performed equally well and are both appropriate as first-line imaging modalities for preoperative imaging of PHPT. When the first-line modality fails to locate an HPG, additional preoperative imaging with the alternate modality offers no benefit. However, if parathyroidectomy is unsuccessful, additional imaging with the alternate modality has merit before repeat surgery.
doi_str_mv 10.1111/cen.14688
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2628300856</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2628300856</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c1300-ccfc4010a860994889bcbc1bd621a94665130bf6c2899b78665000343c8bcfe13</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNo9kc1OHDEMxyPUChbogRdAPpbDsMl8hAyXahktsBJVV2J7HiUZz07QTDJNZivtU_UVCbDUF8v2z7bsPyEXjF6zaHON9prlXIgjMmMZL5I05cUXMqMZpQnlPD8hpyG8UEoLQW-OyUlWsIIyTmfk39qjG9HLyfxFMIPcGrsFY2H0MfB76PaxOsoIdHvvTGPCcAsLj8AYVEnVud5YhPVyM682IG0DZTnARic_V3erObA0g5VrTIMQdmryUk_GWXheL6v3BmMn9LqTdotS9QjOQ-Ng6nAf-XHscUA7AUrdgYtZ_-OcfG1lH_DbwZ-R3_fLTfWYPP16WFWLp0Szt6O1bnVOGZWC07LMhSiVVpqphqdMljnnRcRUy3UqylLdiJiI38nyTAulW2TZGfn-MXf07s8Ow1QPJmjse2nR7UKd8lTERaLgEb36QLV3IXhs68PvakbrN33qqE_9rk9kLw9jd2rA5j_5KUj2CiPSicY</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2628300856</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Preoperative imaging in primary hyperparathyroidism: Are 11 C-Choline PET/CT and 99m Tc-MIBI/ 123 Iodide subtraction SPECT/CT interchangeable or do they supplement each other?</title><source>Wiley Online Library All Journals</source><creator>Christensen, Julie W ; Ismail, Afefah ; Søndergaard, Susanne B ; Bennedbaek, Finn N ; Nygaard, Birte ; Jensen, Lars T ; Trolle, Waldemar ; Holst-Hahn, Christoffer ; Zerahn, Bo ; Kristensen, Bent ; Krakauer, Martin</creator><creatorcontrib>Christensen, Julie W ; Ismail, Afefah ; Søndergaard, Susanne B ; Bennedbaek, Finn N ; Nygaard, Birte ; Jensen, Lars T ; Trolle, Waldemar ; Holst-Hahn, Christoffer ; Zerahn, Bo ; Kristensen, Bent ; Krakauer, Martin</creatorcontrib><description>Preoperative location of hyperfunctioning parathyroid glands (HPGs) is vital when planning minimally invasive surgery in patients with primary hyperparathyroidism (PHPT). Dual-isotope subtraction scintigraphy with Tc-MIBI/ Iodide using SPECT/CT and planar pinhole imaging (Di-SPECT) has shown high sensitivity, but is challenged by high radiation dose, time consumption and cost. C-Choline PET/CT (faster with a lower radiation dose) is non-inferior to Di-SPECT. We aim to clarify to what extent the two are interchangeable and how often there are discrepancies. This is a prospective, GCP-controlled cohort study. One hundred patients diagnosed with PHPT were included and underwent both imaging modalities before parathyroidectomy. Clinical implications of differences between imaging findings and negative imaging results were assessed. Surgical findings confirmed by biochemistry and pathology served as reference standard. Among the 90 patients cured by parathyroidectomy, sensitivity was 82% (95% confidence interval [CI]: 74%-88%) and 87% (95% CI: 79%-92%) for Choline PET and Di-SPECT, respectively, p = .88. In seven cases at least one imaging modality found no HPG. Of these, neither modality found any true HPGs and only two were cured by surgery. When a positive finding in one modality was incorrect, the alternative modality was correct in approximately half of the cases. Choline PET and Di-SPECT performed equally well and are both appropriate as first-line imaging modalities for preoperative imaging of PHPT. When the first-line modality fails to locate an HPG, additional preoperative imaging with the alternate modality offers no benefit. However, if parathyroidectomy is unsuccessful, additional imaging with the alternate modality has merit before repeat surgery.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0300-0664</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1365-2265</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1111/cen.14688</identifier><identifier>PMID: 35150160</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>England</publisher><ispartof>Clinical endocrinology (Oxford), 2022-09, Vol.97 (3), p.258-267</ispartof><rights>2022 The Authors. Clinical Endocrinology published by John Wiley &amp; Sons Ltd.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c1300-ccfc4010a860994889bcbc1bd621a94665130bf6c2899b78665000343c8bcfe13</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c1300-ccfc4010a860994889bcbc1bd621a94665130bf6c2899b78665000343c8bcfe13</cites><orcidid>0000-0003-2680-0121 ; 0000-0002-9540-4950 ; 0000-0003-1846-4498 ; 0000-0002-3390-5637 ; 0000-0002-2191-1861 ; 0000-0002-2301-2878</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27923,27924</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35150160$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Christensen, Julie W</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ismail, Afefah</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Søndergaard, Susanne B</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bennedbaek, Finn N</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Nygaard, Birte</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Jensen, Lars T</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Trolle, Waldemar</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Holst-Hahn, Christoffer</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Zerahn, Bo</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kristensen, Bent</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Krakauer, Martin</creatorcontrib><title>Preoperative imaging in primary hyperparathyroidism: Are 11 C-Choline PET/CT and 99m Tc-MIBI/ 123 Iodide subtraction SPECT/CT interchangeable or do they supplement each other?</title><title>Clinical endocrinology (Oxford)</title><addtitle>Clin Endocrinol (Oxf)</addtitle><description>Preoperative location of hyperfunctioning parathyroid glands (HPGs) is vital when planning minimally invasive surgery in patients with primary hyperparathyroidism (PHPT). Dual-isotope subtraction scintigraphy with Tc-MIBI/ Iodide using SPECT/CT and planar pinhole imaging (Di-SPECT) has shown high sensitivity, but is challenged by high radiation dose, time consumption and cost. C-Choline PET/CT (faster with a lower radiation dose) is non-inferior to Di-SPECT. We aim to clarify to what extent the two are interchangeable and how often there are discrepancies. This is a prospective, GCP-controlled cohort study. One hundred patients diagnosed with PHPT were included and underwent both imaging modalities before parathyroidectomy. Clinical implications of differences between imaging findings and negative imaging results were assessed. Surgical findings confirmed by biochemistry and pathology served as reference standard. Among the 90 patients cured by parathyroidectomy, sensitivity was 82% (95% confidence interval [CI]: 74%-88%) and 87% (95% CI: 79%-92%) for Choline PET and Di-SPECT, respectively, p = .88. In seven cases at least one imaging modality found no HPG. Of these, neither modality found any true HPGs and only two were cured by surgery. When a positive finding in one modality was incorrect, the alternative modality was correct in approximately half of the cases. Choline PET and Di-SPECT performed equally well and are both appropriate as first-line imaging modalities for preoperative imaging of PHPT. When the first-line modality fails to locate an HPG, additional preoperative imaging with the alternate modality offers no benefit. However, if parathyroidectomy is unsuccessful, additional imaging with the alternate modality has merit before repeat surgery.</description><issn>0300-0664</issn><issn>1365-2265</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2022</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNo9kc1OHDEMxyPUChbogRdAPpbDsMl8hAyXahktsBJVV2J7HiUZz07QTDJNZivtU_UVCbDUF8v2z7bsPyEXjF6zaHON9prlXIgjMmMZL5I05cUXMqMZpQnlPD8hpyG8UEoLQW-OyUlWsIIyTmfk39qjG9HLyfxFMIPcGrsFY2H0MfB76PaxOsoIdHvvTGPCcAsLj8AYVEnVud5YhPVyM682IG0DZTnARic_V3erObA0g5VrTIMQdmryUk_GWXheL6v3BmMn9LqTdotS9QjOQ-Ng6nAf-XHscUA7AUrdgYtZ_-OcfG1lH_DbwZ-R3_fLTfWYPP16WFWLp0Szt6O1bnVOGZWC07LMhSiVVpqphqdMljnnRcRUy3UqylLdiJiI38nyTAulW2TZGfn-MXf07s8Ow1QPJmjse2nR7UKd8lTERaLgEb36QLV3IXhs68PvakbrN33qqE_9rk9kLw9jd2rA5j_5KUj2CiPSicY</recordid><startdate>20220901</startdate><enddate>20220901</enddate><creator>Christensen, Julie W</creator><creator>Ismail, Afefah</creator><creator>Søndergaard, Susanne B</creator><creator>Bennedbaek, Finn N</creator><creator>Nygaard, Birte</creator><creator>Jensen, Lars T</creator><creator>Trolle, Waldemar</creator><creator>Holst-Hahn, Christoffer</creator><creator>Zerahn, Bo</creator><creator>Kristensen, Bent</creator><creator>Krakauer, Martin</creator><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2680-0121</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9540-4950</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1846-4498</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3390-5637</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2191-1861</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2301-2878</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20220901</creationdate><title>Preoperative imaging in primary hyperparathyroidism: Are 11 C-Choline PET/CT and 99m Tc-MIBI/ 123 Iodide subtraction SPECT/CT interchangeable or do they supplement each other?</title><author>Christensen, Julie W ; Ismail, Afefah ; Søndergaard, Susanne B ; Bennedbaek, Finn N ; Nygaard, Birte ; Jensen, Lars T ; Trolle, Waldemar ; Holst-Hahn, Christoffer ; Zerahn, Bo ; Kristensen, Bent ; Krakauer, Martin</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c1300-ccfc4010a860994889bcbc1bd621a94665130bf6c2899b78665000343c8bcfe13</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2022</creationdate><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Christensen, Julie W</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ismail, Afefah</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Søndergaard, Susanne B</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bennedbaek, Finn N</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Nygaard, Birte</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Jensen, Lars T</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Trolle, Waldemar</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Holst-Hahn, Christoffer</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Zerahn, Bo</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kristensen, Bent</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Krakauer, Martin</creatorcontrib><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Clinical endocrinology (Oxford)</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Christensen, Julie W</au><au>Ismail, Afefah</au><au>Søndergaard, Susanne B</au><au>Bennedbaek, Finn N</au><au>Nygaard, Birte</au><au>Jensen, Lars T</au><au>Trolle, Waldemar</au><au>Holst-Hahn, Christoffer</au><au>Zerahn, Bo</au><au>Kristensen, Bent</au><au>Krakauer, Martin</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Preoperative imaging in primary hyperparathyroidism: Are 11 C-Choline PET/CT and 99m Tc-MIBI/ 123 Iodide subtraction SPECT/CT interchangeable or do they supplement each other?</atitle><jtitle>Clinical endocrinology (Oxford)</jtitle><addtitle>Clin Endocrinol (Oxf)</addtitle><date>2022-09-01</date><risdate>2022</risdate><volume>97</volume><issue>3</issue><spage>258</spage><epage>267</epage><pages>258-267</pages><issn>0300-0664</issn><eissn>1365-2265</eissn><abstract>Preoperative location of hyperfunctioning parathyroid glands (HPGs) is vital when planning minimally invasive surgery in patients with primary hyperparathyroidism (PHPT). Dual-isotope subtraction scintigraphy with Tc-MIBI/ Iodide using SPECT/CT and planar pinhole imaging (Di-SPECT) has shown high sensitivity, but is challenged by high radiation dose, time consumption and cost. C-Choline PET/CT (faster with a lower radiation dose) is non-inferior to Di-SPECT. We aim to clarify to what extent the two are interchangeable and how often there are discrepancies. This is a prospective, GCP-controlled cohort study. One hundred patients diagnosed with PHPT were included and underwent both imaging modalities before parathyroidectomy. Clinical implications of differences between imaging findings and negative imaging results were assessed. Surgical findings confirmed by biochemistry and pathology served as reference standard. Among the 90 patients cured by parathyroidectomy, sensitivity was 82% (95% confidence interval [CI]: 74%-88%) and 87% (95% CI: 79%-92%) for Choline PET and Di-SPECT, respectively, p = .88. In seven cases at least one imaging modality found no HPG. Of these, neither modality found any true HPGs and only two were cured by surgery. When a positive finding in one modality was incorrect, the alternative modality was correct in approximately half of the cases. Choline PET and Di-SPECT performed equally well and are both appropriate as first-line imaging modalities for preoperative imaging of PHPT. When the first-line modality fails to locate an HPG, additional preoperative imaging with the alternate modality offers no benefit. However, if parathyroidectomy is unsuccessful, additional imaging with the alternate modality has merit before repeat surgery.</abstract><cop>England</cop><pmid>35150160</pmid><doi>10.1111/cen.14688</doi><tpages>10</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2680-0121</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9540-4950</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1846-4498</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3390-5637</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2191-1861</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2301-2878</orcidid></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0300-0664
ispartof Clinical endocrinology (Oxford), 2022-09, Vol.97 (3), p.258-267
issn 0300-0664
1365-2265
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2628300856
source Wiley Online Library All Journals
title Preoperative imaging in primary hyperparathyroidism: Are 11 C-Choline PET/CT and 99m Tc-MIBI/ 123 Iodide subtraction SPECT/CT interchangeable or do they supplement each other?
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-11T07%3A15%3A52IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Preoperative%20imaging%20in%20primary%20hyperparathyroidism:%20Are%2011%20C-Choline%20PET/CT%20and%2099m%20Tc-MIBI/%20123%20Iodide%20subtraction%20SPECT/CT%20interchangeable%20or%20do%20they%20supplement%20each%20other?&rft.jtitle=Clinical%20endocrinology%20(Oxford)&rft.au=Christensen,%20Julie%20W&rft.date=2022-09-01&rft.volume=97&rft.issue=3&rft.spage=258&rft.epage=267&rft.pages=258-267&rft.issn=0300-0664&rft.eissn=1365-2265&rft_id=info:doi/10.1111/cen.14688&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2628300856%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2628300856&rft_id=info:pmid/35150160&rfr_iscdi=true