Exposing and overcoming the fixed-effect fallacy through crowd science
By organizing crowds of scientists to independently tackle the same research questions, we can collectively overcome the generalizability crisis. Strategies to draw inferences from a heterogeneous set of research approaches include aggregation, for instance, meta-analyzing the effect sizes obtained...
Gespeichert in:
| Veröffentlicht in: | The Behavioral and brain sciences 2022-02, Vol.45, p.e8-e8, Article e8 |
|---|---|
| Hauptverfasser: | , , , |
| Format: | Artikel |
| Sprache: | eng |
| Schlagworte: | |
| Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
| Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
| container_end_page | e8 |
|---|---|
| container_issue | |
| container_start_page | e8 |
| container_title | The Behavioral and brain sciences |
| container_volume | 45 |
| creator | Cyrus-Lai, Wilson Tierney, Warren Schweinsberg, Martin Uhlmann, Eric Luis |
| description | By organizing crowds of scientists to independently tackle the same research questions, we can collectively overcome the generalizability crisis. Strategies to draw inferences from a heterogeneous set of research approaches include aggregation, for instance, meta-analyzing the effect sizes obtained by different investigators, and parsing, attempting to identify theoretically meaningful moderators that explain the variability in results. |
| doi_str_mv | 10.1017/S0140525X21000297 |
| format | Article |
| fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2627480443</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><cupid>10_1017_S0140525X21000297</cupid><sourcerecordid>2626988673</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c240t-36bf8766c764f1b581c7528d91975d2642579495e04e16b9b6012f77779d7ce33</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp1kF9LwzAUxYMobk4_gC9S8MWXapLmT_MoY1Nh4IMKvpU2ud061mYmrW7f3pRNBcW8XML53XPvPQidE3xNMJE3T5gwzCl_pQRjTJU8QEPChIpJSvkhGvZy3OsDdOL9MjCccXWMBgkniVKCD9F0sllbXzXzKG9MZN_BaVv333YBUVltwMRQlqDbqMxXq1xvg-BsN19E2tkPE3ldQaPhFB0F3cPZvo7Qy3TyPL6PZ493D-PbWawpw22ciKJMpRBaClaSgqdES05To4iS3FDBKJeKKQ6YARGFKgQmtJThKSM1JMkIXe18186-deDbrK68hrBZA7bzGRVUshQz1qOXv9Cl7VwTtuspodJUyJ4iOyqc472DMlu7qs7dNiM460PO_oQcei72zl1Rg_nu-Eo1AMneNK8LV5k5_Mz-3_YT1VSEIA</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2626988673</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Exposing and overcoming the fixed-effect fallacy through crowd science</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Cambridge University Press Journals Complete</source><creator>Cyrus-Lai, Wilson ; Tierney, Warren ; Schweinsberg, Martin ; Uhlmann, Eric Luis</creator><creatorcontrib>Cyrus-Lai, Wilson ; Tierney, Warren ; Schweinsberg, Martin ; Uhlmann, Eric Luis</creatorcontrib><description>By organizing crowds of scientists to independently tackle the same research questions, we can collectively overcome the generalizability crisis. Strategies to draw inferences from a heterogeneous set of research approaches include aggregation, for instance, meta-analyzing the effect sizes obtained by different investigators, and parsing, attempting to identify theoretically meaningful moderators that explain the variability in results.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0140-525X</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1469-1825</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1017/S0140525X21000297</identifier><identifier>PMID: 35139965</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>New York, USA: Cambridge University Press</publisher><subject>Anger ; Crowding ; Datasets ; Design of experiments ; Gender ; Humans ; Hypotheses ; Open Peer Commentary ; Researchers ; Scientists</subject><ispartof>The Behavioral and brain sciences, 2022-02, Vol.45, p.e8-e8, Article e8</ispartof><rights>Copyright © The Author(s), 2022. Published by Cambridge University Press</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c240t-36bf8766c764f1b581c7528d91975d2642579495e04e16b9b6012f77779d7ce33</cites><orcidid>0000-0002-6362-9936</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.cambridge.org/core/product/identifier/S0140525X21000297/type/journal_article$$EHTML$$P50$$Gcambridge$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>164,314,780,784,27924,27925,55628</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35139965$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Cyrus-Lai, Wilson</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Tierney, Warren</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Schweinsberg, Martin</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Uhlmann, Eric Luis</creatorcontrib><title>Exposing and overcoming the fixed-effect fallacy through crowd science</title><title>The Behavioral and brain sciences</title><addtitle>Behav Brain Sci</addtitle><description>By organizing crowds of scientists to independently tackle the same research questions, we can collectively overcome the generalizability crisis. Strategies to draw inferences from a heterogeneous set of research approaches include aggregation, for instance, meta-analyzing the effect sizes obtained by different investigators, and parsing, attempting to identify theoretically meaningful moderators that explain the variability in results.</description><subject>Anger</subject><subject>Crowding</subject><subject>Datasets</subject><subject>Design of experiments</subject><subject>Gender</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Hypotheses</subject><subject>Open Peer Commentary</subject><subject>Researchers</subject><subject>Scientists</subject><issn>0140-525X</issn><issn>1469-1825</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2022</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><sourceid>8G5</sourceid><sourceid>ABUWG</sourceid><sourceid>AFKRA</sourceid><sourceid>AZQEC</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>CCPQU</sourceid><sourceid>DWQXO</sourceid><sourceid>GNUQQ</sourceid><sourceid>GUQSH</sourceid><sourceid>M2O</sourceid><recordid>eNp1kF9LwzAUxYMobk4_gC9S8MWXapLmT_MoY1Nh4IMKvpU2ud061mYmrW7f3pRNBcW8XML53XPvPQidE3xNMJE3T5gwzCl_pQRjTJU8QEPChIpJSvkhGvZy3OsDdOL9MjCccXWMBgkniVKCD9F0sllbXzXzKG9MZN_BaVv333YBUVltwMRQlqDbqMxXq1xvg-BsN19E2tkPE3ldQaPhFB0F3cPZvo7Qy3TyPL6PZ493D-PbWawpw22ciKJMpRBaClaSgqdES05To4iS3FDBKJeKKQ6YARGFKgQmtJThKSM1JMkIXe18186-deDbrK68hrBZA7bzGRVUshQz1qOXv9Cl7VwTtuspodJUyJ4iOyqc472DMlu7qs7dNiM460PO_oQcei72zl1Rg_nu-Eo1AMneNK8LV5k5_Mz-3_YT1VSEIA</recordid><startdate>20220210</startdate><enddate>20220210</enddate><creator>Cyrus-Lai, Wilson</creator><creator>Tierney, Warren</creator><creator>Schweinsberg, Martin</creator><creator>Uhlmann, Eric Luis</creator><general>Cambridge University Press</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7TK</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88E</scope><scope>88G</scope><scope>8FE</scope><scope>8FH</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>8G5</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BBNVY</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BHPHI</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>GUQSH</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>LK8</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>M1P</scope><scope>M2M</scope><scope>M2O</scope><scope>M7P</scope><scope>MBDVC</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>PSYQQ</scope><scope>Q9U</scope><scope>7X8</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6362-9936</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20220210</creationdate><title>Exposing and overcoming the fixed-effect fallacy through crowd science</title><author>Cyrus-Lai, Wilson ; Tierney, Warren ; Schweinsberg, Martin ; Uhlmann, Eric Luis</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c240t-36bf8766c764f1b581c7528d91975d2642579495e04e16b9b6012f77779d7ce33</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2022</creationdate><topic>Anger</topic><topic>Crowding</topic><topic>Datasets</topic><topic>Design of experiments</topic><topic>Gender</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Hypotheses</topic><topic>Open Peer Commentary</topic><topic>Researchers</topic><topic>Scientists</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Cyrus-Lai, Wilson</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Tierney, Warren</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Schweinsberg, Martin</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Uhlmann, Eric Luis</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Neurosciences Abstracts</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Medical Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Psychology Database (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest SciTech Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Research Library (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>Research Library Prep</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Medical Database</collection><collection>Psychology Database</collection><collection>Research Library</collection><collection>Biological Science Database</collection><collection>Research Library (Corporate)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>ProQuest One Psychology</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>The Behavioral and brain sciences</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Cyrus-Lai, Wilson</au><au>Tierney, Warren</au><au>Schweinsberg, Martin</au><au>Uhlmann, Eric Luis</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Exposing and overcoming the fixed-effect fallacy through crowd science</atitle><jtitle>The Behavioral and brain sciences</jtitle><addtitle>Behav Brain Sci</addtitle><date>2022-02-10</date><risdate>2022</risdate><volume>45</volume><spage>e8</spage><epage>e8</epage><pages>e8-e8</pages><artnum>e8</artnum><issn>0140-525X</issn><eissn>1469-1825</eissn><abstract>By organizing crowds of scientists to independently tackle the same research questions, we can collectively overcome the generalizability crisis. Strategies to draw inferences from a heterogeneous set of research approaches include aggregation, for instance, meta-analyzing the effect sizes obtained by different investigators, and parsing, attempting to identify theoretically meaningful moderators that explain the variability in results.</abstract><cop>New York, USA</cop><pub>Cambridge University Press</pub><pmid>35139965</pmid><doi>10.1017/S0140525X21000297</doi><tpages>2</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6362-9936</orcidid></addata></record> |
| fulltext | fulltext |
| identifier | ISSN: 0140-525X |
| ispartof | The Behavioral and brain sciences, 2022-02, Vol.45, p.e8-e8, Article e8 |
| issn | 0140-525X 1469-1825 |
| language | eng |
| recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2627480443 |
| source | MEDLINE; Cambridge University Press Journals Complete |
| subjects | Anger Crowding Datasets Design of experiments Gender Humans Hypotheses Open Peer Commentary Researchers Scientists |
| title | Exposing and overcoming the fixed-effect fallacy through crowd science |
| url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-04T08%3A06%3A27IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Exposing%20and%20overcoming%20the%20fixed-effect%20fallacy%20through%20crowd%20science&rft.jtitle=The%20Behavioral%20and%20brain%20sciences&rft.au=Cyrus-Lai,%20Wilson&rft.date=2022-02-10&rft.volume=45&rft.spage=e8&rft.epage=e8&rft.pages=e8-e8&rft.artnum=e8&rft.issn=0140-525X&rft.eissn=1469-1825&rft_id=info:doi/10.1017/S0140525X21000297&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2626988673%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2626988673&rft_id=info:pmid/35139965&rft_cupid=10_1017_S0140525X21000297&rfr_iscdi=true |