Effects of a Novel Rotator Cuff Rehabilitation Device on Shoulder Strength and Function

Savitzky, JA, Abrams, LR, Galluzzo, NA, Ostrow, SP, Protosow, TJ, Liu, SA, Handrakis, JP, and Friel, K. Effects of a novel rotator cuff rehabilitation device on shoulder strength and function. J Strength Cond Res 35(12): 3355-3363, 2021-The glenohumeral joint, a multiaxial ball and socket joint, has...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Journal of strength and conditioning research 2021-12, Vol.35 (12), p.3355-3363
Hauptverfasser: Savitzky, Jamie A., Abrams, Lindsay R., Galluzzo, Nicole A., Ostrow, Samantha P., Protosow, Tracy J., Liu, Shou-An, Handrakis, John P., Friel, Karen
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 3363
container_issue 12
container_start_page 3355
container_title Journal of strength and conditioning research
container_volume 35
creator Savitzky, Jamie A.
Abrams, Lindsay R.
Galluzzo, Nicole A.
Ostrow, Samantha P.
Protosow, Tracy J.
Liu, Shou-An
Handrakis, John P.
Friel, Karen
description Savitzky, JA, Abrams, LR, Galluzzo, NA, Ostrow, SP, Protosow, TJ, Liu, SA, Handrakis, JP, and Friel, K. Effects of a novel rotator cuff rehabilitation device on shoulder strength and function. J Strength Cond Res 35(12): 3355-3363, 2021-The glenohumeral joint, a multiaxial ball and socket joint, has inherent instability counterbalanced by the muscular stability of the rotator cuff (RC) and connective tissue. Exercise has been shown to alleviate pain and disability arising from degenerative changes of the RC due to overuse, trauma, or poor posture. This study compared the training effects of ShoulderSphere (SS), an innovative device that uses resistance to centrifugal force, to TheraBand (TB), a traditional device that uses resistance to elasticity. Thirty-five healthy male and female adults (24.2 ± 2.4 years) were randomized into 3 groups: SS, TB, and control. Five outcomes were assessed before and after the twice-weekly, 6-week intervention phase: strength (shoulder flexion [Fx], extension [Ext], external rotation [ER], and internal rotation [IR]), proprioception (6 positions), posterior shoulder endurance (ShEnd), stability (Upper Quarter Y-Balance Test [YBal] (superolateral [YBalSup], medial [YBalMed], and inferolateral [YBalInf]), and power (seated shot put [ShtPt]). Data were analyzed using a 3 (group: SS, TB, and control) × 2 (time: pre and post) generalized estimating equation. Analyses demonstrated a main effect of time for all strength motions (p < 0.01): YBalInf (p < 0.0001), ShtPt (p < 0.05), and ShEnd (p < 0.0001) but no interaction effects of group × time. There were no main or interaction effects for proprioception. Both SS and TB groups had significant within-group increases in Ext, IR, YBalInf, and ShEnd. Only the SS group had significant increases in ER, Fx, and ShtPt. ShoulderSphere demonstrated comparable conditioning effects with TB and may afford additional strength gains in Fx and ER, and power. ShoulderSphere should be considered a viable alternative in RC conditioning.
doi_str_mv 10.1519/JSC.0000000000003347
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2627134490</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2627134490</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3802-f91a1f45c1d3283a37f542909d82a4dcf245068c18954880a50c2a5ffcc6a1513</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNpdkNtKAzEQhoMoHqpvIBLwxpvVHHeTS6mtB0ShVbxcYjZxV9NNTXYtvr0prQecmxmGbz6GH4BDjE4xx_LsZjo8RX-KUlZsgF3MKc0YEcVmmlHOMoEw3gF7Mb4iRDjndBvsUI4plTLfBU8ja43uIvQWKnjnP4yDE9-pzgc47K2FE1Or58Y1adX4Fl6Yj0YbmKZp7XtXmQCnXTDtS1dD1VZw3Ld6Ce6DLatcNAfrPgCP49HD8Cq7vb-8Hp7fZpoKRDIrscKWcY0rSgRVtLCcEYlkJYhilbaEcZQLjYXkTAikONJEcWu1zlWKgQ7Ayco7D_69N7ErZ03UxjnVGt_HkuSkwJQxiRJ6_A999X1o03dLKicylzlPFFtROvgYg7HlPDQzFT5LjMpl8GUKvvwffDo7Wsv755mpfo6-k_71LrzrTIhvrl-YUNZGua5OPkwYKURGEMGYJGuGljv6BbD1izo</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2626296965</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Effects of a Novel Rotator Cuff Rehabilitation Device on Shoulder Strength and Function</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Journals@Ovid Complete</source><creator>Savitzky, Jamie A. ; Abrams, Lindsay R. ; Galluzzo, Nicole A. ; Ostrow, Samantha P. ; Protosow, Tracy J. ; Liu, Shou-An ; Handrakis, John P. ; Friel, Karen</creator><creatorcontrib>Savitzky, Jamie A. ; Abrams, Lindsay R. ; Galluzzo, Nicole A. ; Ostrow, Samantha P. ; Protosow, Tracy J. ; Liu, Shou-An ; Handrakis, John P. ; Friel, Karen</creatorcontrib><description>Savitzky, JA, Abrams, LR, Galluzzo, NA, Ostrow, SP, Protosow, TJ, Liu, SA, Handrakis, JP, and Friel, K. Effects of a novel rotator cuff rehabilitation device on shoulder strength and function. J Strength Cond Res 35(12): 3355-3363, 2021-The glenohumeral joint, a multiaxial ball and socket joint, has inherent instability counterbalanced by the muscular stability of the rotator cuff (RC) and connective tissue. Exercise has been shown to alleviate pain and disability arising from degenerative changes of the RC due to overuse, trauma, or poor posture. This study compared the training effects of ShoulderSphere (SS), an innovative device that uses resistance to centrifugal force, to TheraBand (TB), a traditional device that uses resistance to elasticity. Thirty-five healthy male and female adults (24.2 ± 2.4 years) were randomized into 3 groups: SS, TB, and control. Five outcomes were assessed before and after the twice-weekly, 6-week intervention phase: strength (shoulder flexion [Fx], extension [Ext], external rotation [ER], and internal rotation [IR]), proprioception (6 positions), posterior shoulder endurance (ShEnd), stability (Upper Quarter Y-Balance Test [YBal] (superolateral [YBalSup], medial [YBalMed], and inferolateral [YBalInf]), and power (seated shot put [ShtPt]). Data were analyzed using a 3 (group: SS, TB, and control) × 2 (time: pre and post) generalized estimating equation. Analyses demonstrated a main effect of time for all strength motions (p &lt; 0.01): YBalInf (p &lt; 0.0001), ShtPt (p &lt; 0.05), and ShEnd (p &lt; 0.0001) but no interaction effects of group × time. There were no main or interaction effects for proprioception. Both SS and TB groups had significant within-group increases in Ext, IR, YBalInf, and ShEnd. Only the SS group had significant increases in ER, Fx, and ShtPt. ShoulderSphere demonstrated comparable conditioning effects with TB and may afford additional strength gains in Fx and ER, and power. ShoulderSphere should be considered a viable alternative in RC conditioning.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1064-8011</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1533-4287</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1519/JSC.0000000000003347</identifier><identifier>PMID: 35133996</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>United States: Journal of Strength and Conditioning Research</publisher><subject>Adult ; Balance ; Connective tissues ; Female ; Humans ; Male ; Posture ; Proprioception ; Range of Motion, Articular ; Rehabilitation ; Rotator Cuff ; Shoulder ; Shoulder Joint ; Strength training ; Trauma ; Upper Extremity</subject><ispartof>Journal of strength and conditioning research, 2021-12, Vol.35 (12), p.3355-3363</ispartof><rights>Journal of Strength and Conditioning Research</rights><rights>Copyright © 2019 National Strength and Conditioning Association.</rights><rights>2019 National Strength and Conditioning Association</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3802-f91a1f45c1d3283a37f542909d82a4dcf245068c18954880a50c2a5ffcc6a1513</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3802-f91a1f45c1d3283a37f542909d82a4dcf245068c18954880a50c2a5ffcc6a1513</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,777,781,27905,27906</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35133996$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Savitzky, Jamie A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Abrams, Lindsay R.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Galluzzo, Nicole A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ostrow, Samantha P.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Protosow, Tracy J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Liu, Shou-An</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Handrakis, John P.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Friel, Karen</creatorcontrib><title>Effects of a Novel Rotator Cuff Rehabilitation Device on Shoulder Strength and Function</title><title>Journal of strength and conditioning research</title><addtitle>J Strength Cond Res</addtitle><description>Savitzky, JA, Abrams, LR, Galluzzo, NA, Ostrow, SP, Protosow, TJ, Liu, SA, Handrakis, JP, and Friel, K. Effects of a novel rotator cuff rehabilitation device on shoulder strength and function. J Strength Cond Res 35(12): 3355-3363, 2021-The glenohumeral joint, a multiaxial ball and socket joint, has inherent instability counterbalanced by the muscular stability of the rotator cuff (RC) and connective tissue. Exercise has been shown to alleviate pain and disability arising from degenerative changes of the RC due to overuse, trauma, or poor posture. This study compared the training effects of ShoulderSphere (SS), an innovative device that uses resistance to centrifugal force, to TheraBand (TB), a traditional device that uses resistance to elasticity. Thirty-five healthy male and female adults (24.2 ± 2.4 years) were randomized into 3 groups: SS, TB, and control. Five outcomes were assessed before and after the twice-weekly, 6-week intervention phase: strength (shoulder flexion [Fx], extension [Ext], external rotation [ER], and internal rotation [IR]), proprioception (6 positions), posterior shoulder endurance (ShEnd), stability (Upper Quarter Y-Balance Test [YBal] (superolateral [YBalSup], medial [YBalMed], and inferolateral [YBalInf]), and power (seated shot put [ShtPt]). Data were analyzed using a 3 (group: SS, TB, and control) × 2 (time: pre and post) generalized estimating equation. Analyses demonstrated a main effect of time for all strength motions (p &lt; 0.01): YBalInf (p &lt; 0.0001), ShtPt (p &lt; 0.05), and ShEnd (p &lt; 0.0001) but no interaction effects of group × time. There were no main or interaction effects for proprioception. Both SS and TB groups had significant within-group increases in Ext, IR, YBalInf, and ShEnd. Only the SS group had significant increases in ER, Fx, and ShtPt. ShoulderSphere demonstrated comparable conditioning effects with TB and may afford additional strength gains in Fx and ER, and power. ShoulderSphere should be considered a viable alternative in RC conditioning.</description><subject>Adult</subject><subject>Balance</subject><subject>Connective tissues</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Posture</subject><subject>Proprioception</subject><subject>Range of Motion, Articular</subject><subject>Rehabilitation</subject><subject>Rotator Cuff</subject><subject>Shoulder</subject><subject>Shoulder Joint</subject><subject>Strength training</subject><subject>Trauma</subject><subject>Upper Extremity</subject><issn>1064-8011</issn><issn>1533-4287</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2021</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNpdkNtKAzEQhoMoHqpvIBLwxpvVHHeTS6mtB0ShVbxcYjZxV9NNTXYtvr0prQecmxmGbz6GH4BDjE4xx_LsZjo8RX-KUlZsgF3MKc0YEcVmmlHOMoEw3gF7Mb4iRDjndBvsUI4plTLfBU8ja43uIvQWKnjnP4yDE9-pzgc47K2FE1Or58Y1adX4Fl6Yj0YbmKZp7XtXmQCnXTDtS1dD1VZw3Ld6Ce6DLatcNAfrPgCP49HD8Cq7vb-8Hp7fZpoKRDIrscKWcY0rSgRVtLCcEYlkJYhilbaEcZQLjYXkTAikONJEcWu1zlWKgQ7Ayco7D_69N7ErZ03UxjnVGt_HkuSkwJQxiRJ6_A999X1o03dLKicylzlPFFtROvgYg7HlPDQzFT5LjMpl8GUKvvwffDo7Wsv755mpfo6-k_71LrzrTIhvrl-YUNZGua5OPkwYKURGEMGYJGuGljv6BbD1izo</recordid><startdate>20211201</startdate><enddate>20211201</enddate><creator>Savitzky, Jamie A.</creator><creator>Abrams, Lindsay R.</creator><creator>Galluzzo, Nicole A.</creator><creator>Ostrow, Samantha P.</creator><creator>Protosow, Tracy J.</creator><creator>Liu, Shou-An</creator><creator>Handrakis, John P.</creator><creator>Friel, Karen</creator><general>Journal of Strength and Conditioning Research</general><general>Lippincott Williams &amp; Wilkins Ovid Technologies</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7TS</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>NAPCQ</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20211201</creationdate><title>Effects of a Novel Rotator Cuff Rehabilitation Device on Shoulder Strength and Function</title><author>Savitzky, Jamie A. ; Abrams, Lindsay R. ; Galluzzo, Nicole A. ; Ostrow, Samantha P. ; Protosow, Tracy J. ; Liu, Shou-An ; Handrakis, John P. ; Friel, Karen</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c3802-f91a1f45c1d3283a37f542909d82a4dcf245068c18954880a50c2a5ffcc6a1513</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2021</creationdate><topic>Adult</topic><topic>Balance</topic><topic>Connective tissues</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Posture</topic><topic>Proprioception</topic><topic>Range of Motion, Articular</topic><topic>Rehabilitation</topic><topic>Rotator Cuff</topic><topic>Shoulder</topic><topic>Shoulder Joint</topic><topic>Strength training</topic><topic>Trauma</topic><topic>Upper Extremity</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Savitzky, Jamie A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Abrams, Lindsay R.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Galluzzo, Nicole A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ostrow, Samantha P.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Protosow, Tracy J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Liu, Shou-An</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Handrakis, John P.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Friel, Karen</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Physical Education Index</collection><collection>ProQuest Health &amp; Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Nursing &amp; Allied Health Premium</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Journal of strength and conditioning research</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Savitzky, Jamie A.</au><au>Abrams, Lindsay R.</au><au>Galluzzo, Nicole A.</au><au>Ostrow, Samantha P.</au><au>Protosow, Tracy J.</au><au>Liu, Shou-An</au><au>Handrakis, John P.</au><au>Friel, Karen</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Effects of a Novel Rotator Cuff Rehabilitation Device on Shoulder Strength and Function</atitle><jtitle>Journal of strength and conditioning research</jtitle><addtitle>J Strength Cond Res</addtitle><date>2021-12-01</date><risdate>2021</risdate><volume>35</volume><issue>12</issue><spage>3355</spage><epage>3363</epage><pages>3355-3363</pages><issn>1064-8011</issn><eissn>1533-4287</eissn><abstract>Savitzky, JA, Abrams, LR, Galluzzo, NA, Ostrow, SP, Protosow, TJ, Liu, SA, Handrakis, JP, and Friel, K. Effects of a novel rotator cuff rehabilitation device on shoulder strength and function. J Strength Cond Res 35(12): 3355-3363, 2021-The glenohumeral joint, a multiaxial ball and socket joint, has inherent instability counterbalanced by the muscular stability of the rotator cuff (RC) and connective tissue. Exercise has been shown to alleviate pain and disability arising from degenerative changes of the RC due to overuse, trauma, or poor posture. This study compared the training effects of ShoulderSphere (SS), an innovative device that uses resistance to centrifugal force, to TheraBand (TB), a traditional device that uses resistance to elasticity. Thirty-five healthy male and female adults (24.2 ± 2.4 years) were randomized into 3 groups: SS, TB, and control. Five outcomes were assessed before and after the twice-weekly, 6-week intervention phase: strength (shoulder flexion [Fx], extension [Ext], external rotation [ER], and internal rotation [IR]), proprioception (6 positions), posterior shoulder endurance (ShEnd), stability (Upper Quarter Y-Balance Test [YBal] (superolateral [YBalSup], medial [YBalMed], and inferolateral [YBalInf]), and power (seated shot put [ShtPt]). Data were analyzed using a 3 (group: SS, TB, and control) × 2 (time: pre and post) generalized estimating equation. Analyses demonstrated a main effect of time for all strength motions (p &lt; 0.01): YBalInf (p &lt; 0.0001), ShtPt (p &lt; 0.05), and ShEnd (p &lt; 0.0001) but no interaction effects of group × time. There were no main or interaction effects for proprioception. Both SS and TB groups had significant within-group increases in Ext, IR, YBalInf, and ShEnd. Only the SS group had significant increases in ER, Fx, and ShtPt. ShoulderSphere demonstrated comparable conditioning effects with TB and may afford additional strength gains in Fx and ER, and power. ShoulderSphere should be considered a viable alternative in RC conditioning.</abstract><cop>United States</cop><pub>Journal of Strength and Conditioning Research</pub><pmid>35133996</pmid><doi>10.1519/JSC.0000000000003347</doi><tpages>9</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 1064-8011
ispartof Journal of strength and conditioning research, 2021-12, Vol.35 (12), p.3355-3363
issn 1064-8011
1533-4287
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2627134490
source MEDLINE; Journals@Ovid Complete
subjects Adult
Balance
Connective tissues
Female
Humans
Male
Posture
Proprioception
Range of Motion, Articular
Rehabilitation
Rotator Cuff
Shoulder
Shoulder Joint
Strength training
Trauma
Upper Extremity
title Effects of a Novel Rotator Cuff Rehabilitation Device on Shoulder Strength and Function
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-17T21%3A16%3A44IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Effects%20of%20a%20Novel%20Rotator%20Cuff%20Rehabilitation%20Device%20on%20Shoulder%20Strength%20and%20Function&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20strength%20and%20conditioning%20research&rft.au=Savitzky,%20Jamie%20A.&rft.date=2021-12-01&rft.volume=35&rft.issue=12&rft.spage=3355&rft.epage=3363&rft.pages=3355-3363&rft.issn=1064-8011&rft.eissn=1533-4287&rft_id=info:doi/10.1519/JSC.0000000000003347&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2627134490%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2626296965&rft_id=info:pmid/35133996&rfr_iscdi=true