Frequency and timing of emergency department visits and hospital admissions in stented patients following common stone procedures

Emergency department (ED) visits and hospital admissions (HA) following urologic procedures are a concern for payors, providers, and patients. We seek to quantify ED visits and HA after urologic stone procedures. This is a retrospective cohort study using claims data from the IBM MarketScan Commerci...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Urolithiasis 2022-06, Vol.50 (3), p.381-387
Hauptverfasser: Rashid Kazi, Rohail, Jung, Molly, Kelly, Timothy, Xiong, Yan, Harris, Andrew
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 387
container_issue 3
container_start_page 381
container_title Urolithiasis
container_volume 50
creator Rashid Kazi, Rohail
Jung, Molly
Kelly, Timothy
Xiong, Yan
Harris, Andrew
description Emergency department (ED) visits and hospital admissions (HA) following urologic procedures are a concern for payors, providers, and patients. We seek to quantify ED visits and HA after urologic stone procedures. This is a retrospective cohort study using claims data from the IBM MarketScan Commercial and Medicare Supplement database. Adults with a urologic stone diagnosis and no history of stone procedure in prior 12 months who underwent stone procedures with ureteral stent codes between 2012 and 2017 were included. All-cause vs genitourinary (GU)-related ED visits and HA were evaluated during 30, 60, 90, and 120-day periods following the index urologic stone procedure. 88,047 patients were included in the analytic cohort. For inpatients, rate of all-cause vs GU-related ED visits was 10% vs 9% at 30 days and 19% vs 15% at 120 days. For outpatients, rate of all-cause vs GU-related ED visits was 9% vs 8% at 30 days and 15% vs 12% at 120 days. A similar trend was found when examining HA. Younger patients (18–44 years old) had higher rates of all-cause ED visits following inpatient index stone procedure (13% vs 10% at 30 days, p  ≤ 0.0001). Twenty percent of patients have an ED visit or HA up to 120 days after having a stone procedure with most returning with GU-related complaint. Younger patients had the greatest burden among the study cohort. Further studies need to determine causation of these unplanned visits to guide appropriate intervention.
doi_str_mv 10.1007/s00240-022-01313-6
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2626890261</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2626890261</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c375t-f2551aeb40e8d6144ac932725c0a7c1e303e533bfe3f1c62c8caa3ec2c826b463</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kU-P1SAUxYnROJNxvoALQ-LGTRW4lLZLM3HUZBI3uiY8evtk0kLlUs0s_ebDe2_8Exey4QR-nHvIYey5FK-lEN0bEkJp0QilGiFBQmMesXMlB910Cszjv_QZuyS6FXUNw6CleMrOoJUAetDn7Od1xm8bRn_HXRx5CUuIe54mjgvm_fF8xNXlsmAs_HugUOhIfk20huJm7sYlEIUUiYfIqVQOR766EqoiPqV5Tj8Opj4tSzoQKSJfc_I4bhnpGXsyuZnw8mG_YF-u332--tDcfHr_8ertTeOha0szqbaVDndaYD8aqbXzA6hOtV64zksEAdgC7CaESXqjfO-dA_RVKLPTBi7Yq5NvHV1_TMXW3B7n2UVMG1lllOkHoYys6Mt_0Nu05VjTVcrooe2g7yulTpTPiSjjZNccFpfvrBT20JE9dWRrR_bYkT2kePFgve0WHH8_-dVIBeAEUL2Ke8x_Zv_H9h4PlZ60</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2664957388</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Frequency and timing of emergency department visits and hospital admissions in stented patients following common stone procedures</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>SpringerLink Journals - AutoHoldings</source><creator>Rashid Kazi, Rohail ; Jung, Molly ; Kelly, Timothy ; Xiong, Yan ; Harris, Andrew</creator><creatorcontrib>Rashid Kazi, Rohail ; Jung, Molly ; Kelly, Timothy ; Xiong, Yan ; Harris, Andrew</creatorcontrib><description>Emergency department (ED) visits and hospital admissions (HA) following urologic procedures are a concern for payors, providers, and patients. We seek to quantify ED visits and HA after urologic stone procedures. This is a retrospective cohort study using claims data from the IBM MarketScan Commercial and Medicare Supplement database. Adults with a urologic stone diagnosis and no history of stone procedure in prior 12 months who underwent stone procedures with ureteral stent codes between 2012 and 2017 were included. All-cause vs genitourinary (GU)-related ED visits and HA were evaluated during 30, 60, 90, and 120-day periods following the index urologic stone procedure. 88,047 patients were included in the analytic cohort. For inpatients, rate of all-cause vs GU-related ED visits was 10% vs 9% at 30 days and 19% vs 15% at 120 days. For outpatients, rate of all-cause vs GU-related ED visits was 9% vs 8% at 30 days and 15% vs 12% at 120 days. A similar trend was found when examining HA. Younger patients (18–44 years old) had higher rates of all-cause ED visits following inpatient index stone procedure (13% vs 10% at 30 days, p  ≤ 0.0001). Twenty percent of patients have an ED visit or HA up to 120 days after having a stone procedure with most returning with GU-related complaint. Younger patients had the greatest burden among the study cohort. Further studies need to determine causation of these unplanned visits to guide appropriate intervention.</description><identifier>ISSN: 2194-7236</identifier><identifier>ISSN: 2194-7228</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 2194-7236</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1007/s00240-022-01313-6</identifier><identifier>PMID: 35133494</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Berlin/Heidelberg: Springer Berlin Heidelberg</publisher><subject>Adolescent ; Adult ; Age ; Aged ; Codes ; Complaints ; Emergency medical care ; Emergency Service, Hospital ; Hospitals ; Humans ; Kidney stones ; Lithotripsy ; Medical Biochemistry ; Medicare ; Medicine ; Medicine &amp; Public Health ; Nephrology ; Original Paper ; Patient admissions ; Retrospective Studies ; Stents ; United States - epidemiology ; Urinary tract diseases ; Urological surgery ; Urology ; Variables ; Young Adult</subject><ispartof>Urolithiasis, 2022-06, Vol.50 (3), p.381-387</ispartof><rights>The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature 2022</rights><rights>2022. The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature.</rights><rights>The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature 2022.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c375t-f2551aeb40e8d6144ac932725c0a7c1e303e533bfe3f1c62c8caa3ec2c826b463</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c375t-f2551aeb40e8d6144ac932725c0a7c1e303e533bfe3f1c62c8caa3ec2c826b463</cites><orcidid>0000-0003-0417-1483</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1007/s00240-022-01313-6$$EPDF$$P50$$Gspringer$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://link.springer.com/10.1007/s00240-022-01313-6$$EHTML$$P50$$Gspringer$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,27901,27902,41464,42533,51294</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35133494$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Rashid Kazi, Rohail</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Jung, Molly</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kelly, Timothy</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Xiong, Yan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Harris, Andrew</creatorcontrib><title>Frequency and timing of emergency department visits and hospital admissions in stented patients following common stone procedures</title><title>Urolithiasis</title><addtitle>Urolithiasis</addtitle><addtitle>Urolithiasis</addtitle><description>Emergency department (ED) visits and hospital admissions (HA) following urologic procedures are a concern for payors, providers, and patients. We seek to quantify ED visits and HA after urologic stone procedures. This is a retrospective cohort study using claims data from the IBM MarketScan Commercial and Medicare Supplement database. Adults with a urologic stone diagnosis and no history of stone procedure in prior 12 months who underwent stone procedures with ureteral stent codes between 2012 and 2017 were included. All-cause vs genitourinary (GU)-related ED visits and HA were evaluated during 30, 60, 90, and 120-day periods following the index urologic stone procedure. 88,047 patients were included in the analytic cohort. For inpatients, rate of all-cause vs GU-related ED visits was 10% vs 9% at 30 days and 19% vs 15% at 120 days. For outpatients, rate of all-cause vs GU-related ED visits was 9% vs 8% at 30 days and 15% vs 12% at 120 days. A similar trend was found when examining HA. Younger patients (18–44 years old) had higher rates of all-cause ED visits following inpatient index stone procedure (13% vs 10% at 30 days, p  ≤ 0.0001). Twenty percent of patients have an ED visit or HA up to 120 days after having a stone procedure with most returning with GU-related complaint. Younger patients had the greatest burden among the study cohort. Further studies need to determine causation of these unplanned visits to guide appropriate intervention.</description><subject>Adolescent</subject><subject>Adult</subject><subject>Age</subject><subject>Aged</subject><subject>Codes</subject><subject>Complaints</subject><subject>Emergency medical care</subject><subject>Emergency Service, Hospital</subject><subject>Hospitals</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Kidney stones</subject><subject>Lithotripsy</subject><subject>Medical Biochemistry</subject><subject>Medicare</subject><subject>Medicine</subject><subject>Medicine &amp; Public Health</subject><subject>Nephrology</subject><subject>Original Paper</subject><subject>Patient admissions</subject><subject>Retrospective Studies</subject><subject>Stents</subject><subject>United States - epidemiology</subject><subject>Urinary tract diseases</subject><subject>Urological surgery</subject><subject>Urology</subject><subject>Variables</subject><subject>Young Adult</subject><issn>2194-7236</issn><issn>2194-7228</issn><issn>2194-7236</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2022</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><recordid>eNp9kU-P1SAUxYnROJNxvoALQ-LGTRW4lLZLM3HUZBI3uiY8evtk0kLlUs0s_ebDe2_8Exey4QR-nHvIYey5FK-lEN0bEkJp0QilGiFBQmMesXMlB910Cszjv_QZuyS6FXUNw6CleMrOoJUAetDn7Od1xm8bRn_HXRx5CUuIe54mjgvm_fF8xNXlsmAs_HugUOhIfk20huJm7sYlEIUUiYfIqVQOR766EqoiPqV5Tj8Opj4tSzoQKSJfc_I4bhnpGXsyuZnw8mG_YF-u332--tDcfHr_8ertTeOha0szqbaVDndaYD8aqbXzA6hOtV64zksEAdgC7CaESXqjfO-dA_RVKLPTBi7Yq5NvHV1_TMXW3B7n2UVMG1lllOkHoYys6Mt_0Nu05VjTVcrooe2g7yulTpTPiSjjZNccFpfvrBT20JE9dWRrR_bYkT2kePFgve0WHH8_-dVIBeAEUL2Ke8x_Zv_H9h4PlZ60</recordid><startdate>20220601</startdate><enddate>20220601</enddate><creator>Rashid Kazi, Rohail</creator><creator>Jung, Molly</creator><creator>Kelly, Timothy</creator><creator>Xiong, Yan</creator><creator>Harris, Andrew</creator><general>Springer Berlin Heidelberg</general><general>Springer Nature B.V</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88E</scope><scope>8AO</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>M1P</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>7X8</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0417-1483</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20220601</creationdate><title>Frequency and timing of emergency department visits and hospital admissions in stented patients following common stone procedures</title><author>Rashid Kazi, Rohail ; Jung, Molly ; Kelly, Timothy ; Xiong, Yan ; Harris, Andrew</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c375t-f2551aeb40e8d6144ac932725c0a7c1e303e533bfe3f1c62c8caa3ec2c826b463</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2022</creationdate><topic>Adolescent</topic><topic>Adult</topic><topic>Age</topic><topic>Aged</topic><topic>Codes</topic><topic>Complaints</topic><topic>Emergency medical care</topic><topic>Emergency Service, Hospital</topic><topic>Hospitals</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Kidney stones</topic><topic>Lithotripsy</topic><topic>Medical Biochemistry</topic><topic>Medicare</topic><topic>Medicine</topic><topic>Medicine &amp; Public Health</topic><topic>Nephrology</topic><topic>Original Paper</topic><topic>Patient admissions</topic><topic>Retrospective Studies</topic><topic>Stents</topic><topic>United States - epidemiology</topic><topic>Urinary tract diseases</topic><topic>Urological surgery</topic><topic>Urology</topic><topic>Variables</topic><topic>Young Adult</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Rashid Kazi, Rohail</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Jung, Molly</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kelly, Timothy</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Xiong, Yan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Harris, Andrew</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Health &amp; Medical Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Medical Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Pharma Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Health &amp; Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Health &amp; Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Medical Database</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Urolithiasis</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Rashid Kazi, Rohail</au><au>Jung, Molly</au><au>Kelly, Timothy</au><au>Xiong, Yan</au><au>Harris, Andrew</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Frequency and timing of emergency department visits and hospital admissions in stented patients following common stone procedures</atitle><jtitle>Urolithiasis</jtitle><stitle>Urolithiasis</stitle><addtitle>Urolithiasis</addtitle><date>2022-06-01</date><risdate>2022</risdate><volume>50</volume><issue>3</issue><spage>381</spage><epage>387</epage><pages>381-387</pages><issn>2194-7236</issn><issn>2194-7228</issn><eissn>2194-7236</eissn><abstract>Emergency department (ED) visits and hospital admissions (HA) following urologic procedures are a concern for payors, providers, and patients. We seek to quantify ED visits and HA after urologic stone procedures. This is a retrospective cohort study using claims data from the IBM MarketScan Commercial and Medicare Supplement database. Adults with a urologic stone diagnosis and no history of stone procedure in prior 12 months who underwent stone procedures with ureteral stent codes between 2012 and 2017 were included. All-cause vs genitourinary (GU)-related ED visits and HA were evaluated during 30, 60, 90, and 120-day periods following the index urologic stone procedure. 88,047 patients were included in the analytic cohort. For inpatients, rate of all-cause vs GU-related ED visits was 10% vs 9% at 30 days and 19% vs 15% at 120 days. For outpatients, rate of all-cause vs GU-related ED visits was 9% vs 8% at 30 days and 15% vs 12% at 120 days. A similar trend was found when examining HA. Younger patients (18–44 years old) had higher rates of all-cause ED visits following inpatient index stone procedure (13% vs 10% at 30 days, p  ≤ 0.0001). Twenty percent of patients have an ED visit or HA up to 120 days after having a stone procedure with most returning with GU-related complaint. Younger patients had the greatest burden among the study cohort. Further studies need to determine causation of these unplanned visits to guide appropriate intervention.</abstract><cop>Berlin/Heidelberg</cop><pub>Springer Berlin Heidelberg</pub><pmid>35133494</pmid><doi>10.1007/s00240-022-01313-6</doi><tpages>7</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0417-1483</orcidid></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 2194-7236
ispartof Urolithiasis, 2022-06, Vol.50 (3), p.381-387
issn 2194-7236
2194-7228
2194-7236
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2626890261
source MEDLINE; SpringerLink Journals - AutoHoldings
subjects Adolescent
Adult
Age
Aged
Codes
Complaints
Emergency medical care
Emergency Service, Hospital
Hospitals
Humans
Kidney stones
Lithotripsy
Medical Biochemistry
Medicare
Medicine
Medicine & Public Health
Nephrology
Original Paper
Patient admissions
Retrospective Studies
Stents
United States - epidemiology
Urinary tract diseases
Urological surgery
Urology
Variables
Young Adult
title Frequency and timing of emergency department visits and hospital admissions in stented patients following common stone procedures
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-03T15%3A52%3A02IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Frequency%20and%20timing%20of%20emergency%20department%20visits%20and%20hospital%20admissions%20in%20stented%20patients%20following%20common%20stone%20procedures&rft.jtitle=Urolithiasis&rft.au=Rashid%20Kazi,%20Rohail&rft.date=2022-06-01&rft.volume=50&rft.issue=3&rft.spage=381&rft.epage=387&rft.pages=381-387&rft.issn=2194-7236&rft.eissn=2194-7236&rft_id=info:doi/10.1007/s00240-022-01313-6&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2626890261%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2664957388&rft_id=info:pmid/35133494&rfr_iscdi=true