Editorial Commentary: To Properly Apply Delphi Consensus Conclusions, Strengths and Weaknesses of the Process Require Consideration: Unified Expert Opinion or Toxic Fumes Resulting in a Strange Trance?

The Delphi Consensus Process is a tool to allow diverse expert opinion to be consolidated to better understand complex problems. The process has recently been applied to orthopaedic treatment options. While a piece of the puzzle, the strengths and weaknesses of this process must be understood to all...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Arthroscopy 2022-02, Vol.38 (2), p.247-249
1. Verfasser: Weber, Stephen C
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 249
container_issue 2
container_start_page 247
container_title Arthroscopy
container_volume 38
creator Weber, Stephen C
description The Delphi Consensus Process is a tool to allow diverse expert opinion to be consolidated to better understand complex problems. The process has recently been applied to orthopaedic treatment options. While a piece of the puzzle, the strengths and weaknesses of this process must be understood to allow the orthopaedist to apply the conclusions of the Delphi Consensus process effectively. It is important to recognize that expert opinion has been upended time and time again by carefully collected clinical-outcome data. It is unclear whether the visions of the Oracle are due to wisdom or toxic fumes resulting in a strange trance.
doi_str_mv 10.1016/j.arthro.2021.08.027
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2626222733</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2626222733</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c307t-bf3f3112158b9e4483f91f9142028b7fa06d5c3c099fed1afc2dd6f4495cb5053</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNo9UV1rFDEUDWKxa_UfiOTRh86Yj_nsi5R1q0KhYrf0MWQyN7tZZ5JpkoH2J_ZfmXGrJOSGwz3nXO5B6AMlOSW0-nzIpY9773JGGM1JkxNWv0IrWrIq44zT12hF6qLNGlLxU_Q2hAMhhPOGv0GnvKSM16RaoedNb6LzRg547cYRbJT-6QJvHf7p3QR-eMKX05TerzBMe5OabAAb5rD81DAHk4BzfBs92F3cByxtj-9B_rYQAgTsNI57WMRUAvAveJiNh78ypgcvY-Jf4DtrtIEebx6TZcQ3k7EJx86nQR6NwlfzCAs5zEM0doeNxXLxlHYHeJuKgi_v0ImWQ4D3L_UM3V1ttuvv2fXNtx_ry-tMcVLHrNNcc0oZLZuuhaJouG5pukVaY9PVWpKqLxVXpG019FRqxfq-0kXRlqorScnP0Kej7uTdwwwhitEEBcMgLbg5CFalw1jNeWotjq3KuxA8aDF5M6YFC0rEEqI4iGOIYglRkEakEBPt44vD3I3Q_yf9S43_AbplnpA</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2626222733</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Editorial Commentary: To Properly Apply Delphi Consensus Conclusions, Strengths and Weaknesses of the Process Require Consideration: Unified Expert Opinion or Toxic Fumes Resulting in a Strange Trance?</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals</source><creator>Weber, Stephen C</creator><creatorcontrib>Weber, Stephen C</creatorcontrib><description>The Delphi Consensus Process is a tool to allow diverse expert opinion to be consolidated to better understand complex problems. The process has recently been applied to orthopaedic treatment options. While a piece of the puzzle, the strengths and weaknesses of this process must be understood to allow the orthopaedist to apply the conclusions of the Delphi Consensus process effectively. It is important to recognize that expert opinion has been upended time and time again by carefully collected clinical-outcome data. It is unclear whether the visions of the Oracle are due to wisdom or toxic fumes resulting in a strange trance.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0749-8063</identifier><identifier>ISSN: 1526-3231</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1526-3231</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.arthro.2021.08.027</identifier><identifier>PMID: 35123706</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>United States</publisher><subject>Causality ; Consensus ; Delphi Technique ; Humans</subject><ispartof>Arthroscopy, 2022-02, Vol.38 (2), p.247-249</ispartof><rights>Copyright © 2021 Arthroscopy Association of North America. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c307t-bf3f3112158b9e4483f91f9142028b7fa06d5c3c099fed1afc2dd6f4495cb5053</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c307t-bf3f3112158b9e4483f91f9142028b7fa06d5c3c099fed1afc2dd6f4495cb5053</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,27901,27902</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35123706$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Weber, Stephen C</creatorcontrib><title>Editorial Commentary: To Properly Apply Delphi Consensus Conclusions, Strengths and Weaknesses of the Process Require Consideration: Unified Expert Opinion or Toxic Fumes Resulting in a Strange Trance?</title><title>Arthroscopy</title><addtitle>Arthroscopy</addtitle><description>The Delphi Consensus Process is a tool to allow diverse expert opinion to be consolidated to better understand complex problems. The process has recently been applied to orthopaedic treatment options. While a piece of the puzzle, the strengths and weaknesses of this process must be understood to allow the orthopaedist to apply the conclusions of the Delphi Consensus process effectively. It is important to recognize that expert opinion has been upended time and time again by carefully collected clinical-outcome data. It is unclear whether the visions of the Oracle are due to wisdom or toxic fumes resulting in a strange trance.</description><subject>Causality</subject><subject>Consensus</subject><subject>Delphi Technique</subject><subject>Humans</subject><issn>0749-8063</issn><issn>1526-3231</issn><issn>1526-3231</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2022</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNo9UV1rFDEUDWKxa_UfiOTRh86Yj_nsi5R1q0KhYrf0MWQyN7tZZ5JpkoH2J_ZfmXGrJOSGwz3nXO5B6AMlOSW0-nzIpY9773JGGM1JkxNWv0IrWrIq44zT12hF6qLNGlLxU_Q2hAMhhPOGv0GnvKSM16RaoedNb6LzRg547cYRbJT-6QJvHf7p3QR-eMKX05TerzBMe5OabAAb5rD81DAHk4BzfBs92F3cByxtj-9B_rYQAgTsNI57WMRUAvAveJiNh78ypgcvY-Jf4DtrtIEebx6TZcQ3k7EJx86nQR6NwlfzCAs5zEM0doeNxXLxlHYHeJuKgi_v0ImWQ4D3L_UM3V1ttuvv2fXNtx_ry-tMcVLHrNNcc0oZLZuuhaJouG5pukVaY9PVWpKqLxVXpG019FRqxfq-0kXRlqorScnP0Kej7uTdwwwhitEEBcMgLbg5CFalw1jNeWotjq3KuxA8aDF5M6YFC0rEEqI4iGOIYglRkEakEBPt44vD3I3Q_yf9S43_AbplnpA</recordid><startdate>202202</startdate><enddate>202202</enddate><creator>Weber, Stephen C</creator><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>202202</creationdate><title>Editorial Commentary: To Properly Apply Delphi Consensus Conclusions, Strengths and Weaknesses of the Process Require Consideration: Unified Expert Opinion or Toxic Fumes Resulting in a Strange Trance?</title><author>Weber, Stephen C</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c307t-bf3f3112158b9e4483f91f9142028b7fa06d5c3c099fed1afc2dd6f4495cb5053</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2022</creationdate><topic>Causality</topic><topic>Consensus</topic><topic>Delphi Technique</topic><topic>Humans</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Weber, Stephen C</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Arthroscopy</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Weber, Stephen C</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Editorial Commentary: To Properly Apply Delphi Consensus Conclusions, Strengths and Weaknesses of the Process Require Consideration: Unified Expert Opinion or Toxic Fumes Resulting in a Strange Trance?</atitle><jtitle>Arthroscopy</jtitle><addtitle>Arthroscopy</addtitle><date>2022-02</date><risdate>2022</risdate><volume>38</volume><issue>2</issue><spage>247</spage><epage>249</epage><pages>247-249</pages><issn>0749-8063</issn><issn>1526-3231</issn><eissn>1526-3231</eissn><abstract>The Delphi Consensus Process is a tool to allow diverse expert opinion to be consolidated to better understand complex problems. The process has recently been applied to orthopaedic treatment options. While a piece of the puzzle, the strengths and weaknesses of this process must be understood to allow the orthopaedist to apply the conclusions of the Delphi Consensus process effectively. It is important to recognize that expert opinion has been upended time and time again by carefully collected clinical-outcome data. It is unclear whether the visions of the Oracle are due to wisdom or toxic fumes resulting in a strange trance.</abstract><cop>United States</cop><pmid>35123706</pmid><doi>10.1016/j.arthro.2021.08.027</doi><tpages>3</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0749-8063
ispartof Arthroscopy, 2022-02, Vol.38 (2), p.247-249
issn 0749-8063
1526-3231
1526-3231
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2626222733
source MEDLINE; Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals
subjects Causality
Consensus
Delphi Technique
Humans
title Editorial Commentary: To Properly Apply Delphi Consensus Conclusions, Strengths and Weaknesses of the Process Require Consideration: Unified Expert Opinion or Toxic Fumes Resulting in a Strange Trance?
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-08T01%3A59%3A54IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Editorial%20Commentary:%20To%20Properly%20Apply%20Delphi%20Consensus%20Conclusions,%20Strengths%20and%20Weaknesses%20of%20the%20Process%20Require%20Consideration:%20Unified%20Expert%20Opinion%20or%20Toxic%20Fumes%20Resulting%20in%20a%20Strange%20Trance?&rft.jtitle=Arthroscopy&rft.au=Weber,%20Stephen%20C&rft.date=2022-02&rft.volume=38&rft.issue=2&rft.spage=247&rft.epage=249&rft.pages=247-249&rft.issn=0749-8063&rft.eissn=1526-3231&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.arthro.2021.08.027&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2626222733%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2626222733&rft_id=info:pmid/35123706&rfr_iscdi=true