Clinical Decision Support Systems to Reduce Unnecessary Clostridioides difficile Testing Across Multiple Hospitals
Abstract Background Inappropriate Clostridioides difficile testing has adverse consequences for patients, hospitals, and public health. Computerized clinical decision support (CCDS) systems in the electronic health record (EHR) may reduce C. difficile test ordering; however, effectiveness of differe...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Clinical infectious diseases 2022-09, Vol.75 (7), p.1187-1193 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 1193 |
---|---|
container_issue | 7 |
container_start_page | 1187 |
container_title | Clinical infectious diseases |
container_volume | 75 |
creator | Rock, Clare Abosi, Oluchi Bleasdale, Susan Colligan, Erin Diekema, Daniel J Dullabh, Prashila Gurses, Ayse P Heaney-Huls, Krysta Jacob, Jesse T Kandiah, Sheetal Lama, Sonam Leekha, Surbhi Mayer, Jeanmarie Mena Lora, Alfredo J Morgan, Daniel J Osei, Patience Pau, Sara Salinas, Jorge L Spivak, Emily Wenzler, Eric Cosgrove, Sara E |
description | Abstract
Background
Inappropriate Clostridioides difficile testing has adverse consequences for patients, hospitals, and public health. Computerized clinical decision support (CCDS) systems in the electronic health record (EHR) may reduce C. difficile test ordering; however, effectiveness of different approaches, ease of use, and best fit into healthcare providers’ (HCP) workflow are not well understood.
Methods
Nine academic and 6 community hospitals in the United States participated in this 2-year cohort study. CCDS (hard stop or soft stop) triggered when a duplicate C. difficile test order was attempted or if laxatives were recently received. The primary outcome was the difference in testing rates pre– and post–CCDS interventions, using incidence rate ratios (IRRs) and mixed-effect Poisson regression models. We performed qualitative evaluation (contextual inquiry, interviews, focus groups) based on a human factors model. We identified themes using a codebook with primary nodes and subnodes.
Results
In 9 hospitals implementing hard-stop CCDS and 4 hospitals implementing soft-stop CCDS, C. difficile testing incidence rate (IR) reduction was 33% (95% confidence interval [CI]: 30%–36%) and 23% (95% CI: 21%–25%), respectively. Two hospitals implemented a non-EHR-based human intervention with IR reduction of 21% (95% CI: 15%–28%). HCPs reported generally favorable experiences and highlighted time efficiencies such as inclusion of the patient’s most recent laxative administration on the CCDS. Organizational factors, including hierarchical cultures and communication between HCPs caring for the same patient, impact CCDS acceptance and integration.
Conclusions
CCDS systems reduced unnecessary C. difficile testing and were perceived positively by HCPs when integrated into their workflow and when displaying relevant patient-specific information needed for decision making.
This 15-hospital, 2-year cohort, mixed-methods study found reduced Clostridioides difficiletest incidence rates after computerized clinical decision support (CCDS) implementation. Healthcare providers’ perceptions were positive when CCDS was integrated into their workflow and provided relevant patient-specific information. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1093/cid/ciac074 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2624661424</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><oup_id>10.1093/cid/ciac074</oup_id><sourcerecordid>2624661424</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c320t-cec3f0e3d27f064175f0a515ec1469a95375d725aaa09b08c6fbcd9cd8a091ba3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kEtLxDAUhYMozji6ci9ZiSDVm7bpYznUJ4wIzsy6pMmNRDpNTdrF_HujM7p0cbkPPg7nHkLOGdwwKJNbaVQoISFPD8iU8SSPMl6ywzADL6K0SIoJOfH-A4CxAvgxmSScAWQxTImrWtMZKVp6h9J4Yzu6HPveuoEut37AjaeDpW-oRol03XUo0XvhtrRqrR-cUcYahZ4qo7WRpkW6Qj-Y7p3OpbPe05exHUwf7k_W92YQrT8lRzo0PNv3GVk_3K-qp2jx-vhczReRTGIYIoky0YCJinMNWcpyrkFwxlGyNCtFGf7kKo-5EALKBgqZ6UaqUqoi7KwRyYxc7XR7Zz_H4KreGC-xbUWHdvR1nMVplrE0TgN6vUN_PDvUde_MJrxZM6i_Q65DyPU-5EBf7IXHZoPqj_1NNQCXO8CO_b9KX0FPiCY</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2624661424</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Clinical Decision Support Systems to Reduce Unnecessary Clostridioides difficile Testing Across Multiple Hospitals</title><source>Oxford University Press Journals All Titles (1996-Current)</source><source>MEDLINE</source><source>EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals</source><source>Alma/SFX Local Collection</source><creator>Rock, Clare ; Abosi, Oluchi ; Bleasdale, Susan ; Colligan, Erin ; Diekema, Daniel J ; Dullabh, Prashila ; Gurses, Ayse P ; Heaney-Huls, Krysta ; Jacob, Jesse T ; Kandiah, Sheetal ; Lama, Sonam ; Leekha, Surbhi ; Mayer, Jeanmarie ; Mena Lora, Alfredo J ; Morgan, Daniel J ; Osei, Patience ; Pau, Sara ; Salinas, Jorge L ; Spivak, Emily ; Wenzler, Eric ; Cosgrove, Sara E</creator><creatorcontrib>Rock, Clare ; Abosi, Oluchi ; Bleasdale, Susan ; Colligan, Erin ; Diekema, Daniel J ; Dullabh, Prashila ; Gurses, Ayse P ; Heaney-Huls, Krysta ; Jacob, Jesse T ; Kandiah, Sheetal ; Lama, Sonam ; Leekha, Surbhi ; Mayer, Jeanmarie ; Mena Lora, Alfredo J ; Morgan, Daniel J ; Osei, Patience ; Pau, Sara ; Salinas, Jorge L ; Spivak, Emily ; Wenzler, Eric ; Cosgrove, Sara E</creatorcontrib><description>Abstract
Background
Inappropriate Clostridioides difficile testing has adverse consequences for patients, hospitals, and public health. Computerized clinical decision support (CCDS) systems in the electronic health record (EHR) may reduce C. difficile test ordering; however, effectiveness of different approaches, ease of use, and best fit into healthcare providers’ (HCP) workflow are not well understood.
Methods
Nine academic and 6 community hospitals in the United States participated in this 2-year cohort study. CCDS (hard stop or soft stop) triggered when a duplicate C. difficile test order was attempted or if laxatives were recently received. The primary outcome was the difference in testing rates pre– and post–CCDS interventions, using incidence rate ratios (IRRs) and mixed-effect Poisson regression models. We performed qualitative evaluation (contextual inquiry, interviews, focus groups) based on a human factors model. We identified themes using a codebook with primary nodes and subnodes.
Results
In 9 hospitals implementing hard-stop CCDS and 4 hospitals implementing soft-stop CCDS, C. difficile testing incidence rate (IR) reduction was 33% (95% confidence interval [CI]: 30%–36%) and 23% (95% CI: 21%–25%), respectively. Two hospitals implemented a non-EHR-based human intervention with IR reduction of 21% (95% CI: 15%–28%). HCPs reported generally favorable experiences and highlighted time efficiencies such as inclusion of the patient’s most recent laxative administration on the CCDS. Organizational factors, including hierarchical cultures and communication between HCPs caring for the same patient, impact CCDS acceptance and integration.
Conclusions
CCDS systems reduced unnecessary C. difficile testing and were perceived positively by HCPs when integrated into their workflow and when displaying relevant patient-specific information needed for decision making.
This 15-hospital, 2-year cohort, mixed-methods study found reduced Clostridioides difficiletest incidence rates after computerized clinical decision support (CCDS) implementation. Healthcare providers’ perceptions were positive when CCDS was integrated into their workflow and provided relevant patient-specific information.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1058-4838</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1537-6591</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1093/cid/ciac074</identifier><identifier>PMID: 35100620</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>US: Oxford University Press</publisher><subject>Clostridioides ; Clostridioides difficile ; Clostridium Infections - diagnosis ; Clostridium Infections - epidemiology ; Cohort Studies ; Decision Support Systems, Clinical ; Hospitals ; Humans ; Laxatives</subject><ispartof>Clinical infectious diseases, 2022-09, Vol.75 (7), p.1187-1193</ispartof><rights>The Author(s) 2022. Published by Oxford University Press for the Infectious Diseases Society of America. All rights reserved. For permissions, e-mail: journals.permissions@oup.com. 2022</rights><rights>The Author(s) 2022. Published by Oxford University Press for the Infectious Diseases Society of America. All rights reserved. For permissions, e-mail: journals.permissions@oup.com.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c320t-cec3f0e3d27f064175f0a515ec1469a95375d725aaa09b08c6fbcd9cd8a091ba3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c320t-cec3f0e3d27f064175f0a515ec1469a95375d725aaa09b08c6fbcd9cd8a091ba3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,1578,27901,27902</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35100620$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Rock, Clare</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Abosi, Oluchi</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bleasdale, Susan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Colligan, Erin</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Diekema, Daniel J</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Dullabh, Prashila</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gurses, Ayse P</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Heaney-Huls, Krysta</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Jacob, Jesse T</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kandiah, Sheetal</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lama, Sonam</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Leekha, Surbhi</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mayer, Jeanmarie</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mena Lora, Alfredo J</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Morgan, Daniel J</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Osei, Patience</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Pau, Sara</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Salinas, Jorge L</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Spivak, Emily</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wenzler, Eric</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Cosgrove, Sara E</creatorcontrib><title>Clinical Decision Support Systems to Reduce Unnecessary Clostridioides difficile Testing Across Multiple Hospitals</title><title>Clinical infectious diseases</title><addtitle>Clin Infect Dis</addtitle><description>Abstract
Background
Inappropriate Clostridioides difficile testing has adverse consequences for patients, hospitals, and public health. Computerized clinical decision support (CCDS) systems in the electronic health record (EHR) may reduce C. difficile test ordering; however, effectiveness of different approaches, ease of use, and best fit into healthcare providers’ (HCP) workflow are not well understood.
Methods
Nine academic and 6 community hospitals in the United States participated in this 2-year cohort study. CCDS (hard stop or soft stop) triggered when a duplicate C. difficile test order was attempted or if laxatives were recently received. The primary outcome was the difference in testing rates pre– and post–CCDS interventions, using incidence rate ratios (IRRs) and mixed-effect Poisson regression models. We performed qualitative evaluation (contextual inquiry, interviews, focus groups) based on a human factors model. We identified themes using a codebook with primary nodes and subnodes.
Results
In 9 hospitals implementing hard-stop CCDS and 4 hospitals implementing soft-stop CCDS, C. difficile testing incidence rate (IR) reduction was 33% (95% confidence interval [CI]: 30%–36%) and 23% (95% CI: 21%–25%), respectively. Two hospitals implemented a non-EHR-based human intervention with IR reduction of 21% (95% CI: 15%–28%). HCPs reported generally favorable experiences and highlighted time efficiencies such as inclusion of the patient’s most recent laxative administration on the CCDS. Organizational factors, including hierarchical cultures and communication between HCPs caring for the same patient, impact CCDS acceptance and integration.
Conclusions
CCDS systems reduced unnecessary C. difficile testing and were perceived positively by HCPs when integrated into their workflow and when displaying relevant patient-specific information needed for decision making.
This 15-hospital, 2-year cohort, mixed-methods study found reduced Clostridioides difficiletest incidence rates after computerized clinical decision support (CCDS) implementation. Healthcare providers’ perceptions were positive when CCDS was integrated into their workflow and provided relevant patient-specific information.</description><subject>Clostridioides</subject><subject>Clostridioides difficile</subject><subject>Clostridium Infections - diagnosis</subject><subject>Clostridium Infections - epidemiology</subject><subject>Cohort Studies</subject><subject>Decision Support Systems, Clinical</subject><subject>Hospitals</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Laxatives</subject><issn>1058-4838</issn><issn>1537-6591</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2022</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNp9kEtLxDAUhYMozji6ci9ZiSDVm7bpYznUJ4wIzsy6pMmNRDpNTdrF_HujM7p0cbkPPg7nHkLOGdwwKJNbaVQoISFPD8iU8SSPMl6ywzADL6K0SIoJOfH-A4CxAvgxmSScAWQxTImrWtMZKVp6h9J4Yzu6HPveuoEut37AjaeDpW-oRol03XUo0XvhtrRqrR-cUcYahZ4qo7WRpkW6Qj-Y7p3OpbPe05exHUwf7k_W92YQrT8lRzo0PNv3GVk_3K-qp2jx-vhczReRTGIYIoky0YCJinMNWcpyrkFwxlGyNCtFGf7kKo-5EALKBgqZ6UaqUqoi7KwRyYxc7XR7Zz_H4KreGC-xbUWHdvR1nMVplrE0TgN6vUN_PDvUde_MJrxZM6i_Q65DyPU-5EBf7IXHZoPqj_1NNQCXO8CO_b9KX0FPiCY</recordid><startdate>20220930</startdate><enddate>20220930</enddate><creator>Rock, Clare</creator><creator>Abosi, Oluchi</creator><creator>Bleasdale, Susan</creator><creator>Colligan, Erin</creator><creator>Diekema, Daniel J</creator><creator>Dullabh, Prashila</creator><creator>Gurses, Ayse P</creator><creator>Heaney-Huls, Krysta</creator><creator>Jacob, Jesse T</creator><creator>Kandiah, Sheetal</creator><creator>Lama, Sonam</creator><creator>Leekha, Surbhi</creator><creator>Mayer, Jeanmarie</creator><creator>Mena Lora, Alfredo J</creator><creator>Morgan, Daniel J</creator><creator>Osei, Patience</creator><creator>Pau, Sara</creator><creator>Salinas, Jorge L</creator><creator>Spivak, Emily</creator><creator>Wenzler, Eric</creator><creator>Cosgrove, Sara E</creator><general>Oxford University Press</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20220930</creationdate><title>Clinical Decision Support Systems to Reduce Unnecessary Clostridioides difficile Testing Across Multiple Hospitals</title><author>Rock, Clare ; Abosi, Oluchi ; Bleasdale, Susan ; Colligan, Erin ; Diekema, Daniel J ; Dullabh, Prashila ; Gurses, Ayse P ; Heaney-Huls, Krysta ; Jacob, Jesse T ; Kandiah, Sheetal ; Lama, Sonam ; Leekha, Surbhi ; Mayer, Jeanmarie ; Mena Lora, Alfredo J ; Morgan, Daniel J ; Osei, Patience ; Pau, Sara ; Salinas, Jorge L ; Spivak, Emily ; Wenzler, Eric ; Cosgrove, Sara E</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c320t-cec3f0e3d27f064175f0a515ec1469a95375d725aaa09b08c6fbcd9cd8a091ba3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2022</creationdate><topic>Clostridioides</topic><topic>Clostridioides difficile</topic><topic>Clostridium Infections - diagnosis</topic><topic>Clostridium Infections - epidemiology</topic><topic>Cohort Studies</topic><topic>Decision Support Systems, Clinical</topic><topic>Hospitals</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Laxatives</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Rock, Clare</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Abosi, Oluchi</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bleasdale, Susan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Colligan, Erin</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Diekema, Daniel J</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Dullabh, Prashila</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gurses, Ayse P</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Heaney-Huls, Krysta</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Jacob, Jesse T</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kandiah, Sheetal</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lama, Sonam</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Leekha, Surbhi</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mayer, Jeanmarie</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mena Lora, Alfredo J</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Morgan, Daniel J</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Osei, Patience</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Pau, Sara</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Salinas, Jorge L</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Spivak, Emily</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wenzler, Eric</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Cosgrove, Sara E</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Clinical infectious diseases</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Rock, Clare</au><au>Abosi, Oluchi</au><au>Bleasdale, Susan</au><au>Colligan, Erin</au><au>Diekema, Daniel J</au><au>Dullabh, Prashila</au><au>Gurses, Ayse P</au><au>Heaney-Huls, Krysta</au><au>Jacob, Jesse T</au><au>Kandiah, Sheetal</au><au>Lama, Sonam</au><au>Leekha, Surbhi</au><au>Mayer, Jeanmarie</au><au>Mena Lora, Alfredo J</au><au>Morgan, Daniel J</au><au>Osei, Patience</au><au>Pau, Sara</au><au>Salinas, Jorge L</au><au>Spivak, Emily</au><au>Wenzler, Eric</au><au>Cosgrove, Sara E</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Clinical Decision Support Systems to Reduce Unnecessary Clostridioides difficile Testing Across Multiple Hospitals</atitle><jtitle>Clinical infectious diseases</jtitle><addtitle>Clin Infect Dis</addtitle><date>2022-09-30</date><risdate>2022</risdate><volume>75</volume><issue>7</issue><spage>1187</spage><epage>1193</epage><pages>1187-1193</pages><issn>1058-4838</issn><eissn>1537-6591</eissn><abstract>Abstract
Background
Inappropriate Clostridioides difficile testing has adverse consequences for patients, hospitals, and public health. Computerized clinical decision support (CCDS) systems in the electronic health record (EHR) may reduce C. difficile test ordering; however, effectiveness of different approaches, ease of use, and best fit into healthcare providers’ (HCP) workflow are not well understood.
Methods
Nine academic and 6 community hospitals in the United States participated in this 2-year cohort study. CCDS (hard stop or soft stop) triggered when a duplicate C. difficile test order was attempted or if laxatives were recently received. The primary outcome was the difference in testing rates pre– and post–CCDS interventions, using incidence rate ratios (IRRs) and mixed-effect Poisson regression models. We performed qualitative evaluation (contextual inquiry, interviews, focus groups) based on a human factors model. We identified themes using a codebook with primary nodes and subnodes.
Results
In 9 hospitals implementing hard-stop CCDS and 4 hospitals implementing soft-stop CCDS, C. difficile testing incidence rate (IR) reduction was 33% (95% confidence interval [CI]: 30%–36%) and 23% (95% CI: 21%–25%), respectively. Two hospitals implemented a non-EHR-based human intervention with IR reduction of 21% (95% CI: 15%–28%). HCPs reported generally favorable experiences and highlighted time efficiencies such as inclusion of the patient’s most recent laxative administration on the CCDS. Organizational factors, including hierarchical cultures and communication between HCPs caring for the same patient, impact CCDS acceptance and integration.
Conclusions
CCDS systems reduced unnecessary C. difficile testing and were perceived positively by HCPs when integrated into their workflow and when displaying relevant patient-specific information needed for decision making.
This 15-hospital, 2-year cohort, mixed-methods study found reduced Clostridioides difficiletest incidence rates after computerized clinical decision support (CCDS) implementation. Healthcare providers’ perceptions were positive when CCDS was integrated into their workflow and provided relevant patient-specific information.</abstract><cop>US</cop><pub>Oxford University Press</pub><pmid>35100620</pmid><doi>10.1093/cid/ciac074</doi><tpages>7</tpages></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 1058-4838 |
ispartof | Clinical infectious diseases, 2022-09, Vol.75 (7), p.1187-1193 |
issn | 1058-4838 1537-6591 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2624661424 |
source | Oxford University Press Journals All Titles (1996-Current); MEDLINE; EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals; Alma/SFX Local Collection |
subjects | Clostridioides Clostridioides difficile Clostridium Infections - diagnosis Clostridium Infections - epidemiology Cohort Studies Decision Support Systems, Clinical Hospitals Humans Laxatives |
title | Clinical Decision Support Systems to Reduce Unnecessary Clostridioides difficile Testing Across Multiple Hospitals |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-10T09%3A15%3A06IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Clinical%20Decision%20Support%20Systems%20to%20Reduce%20Unnecessary%20Clostridioides%20difficile%20Testing%20Across%20Multiple%20Hospitals&rft.jtitle=Clinical%20infectious%20diseases&rft.au=Rock,%20Clare&rft.date=2022-09-30&rft.volume=75&rft.issue=7&rft.spage=1187&rft.epage=1193&rft.pages=1187-1193&rft.issn=1058-4838&rft.eissn=1537-6591&rft_id=info:doi/10.1093/cid/ciac074&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2624661424%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2624661424&rft_id=info:pmid/35100620&rft_oup_id=10.1093/cid/ciac074&rfr_iscdi=true |