Comparison of Outcomes and Complications Among Patients with Different Indications of Acute/Subacute Complicated Stanford Type B Aortic Dissection Treated by TEVAR: Data from the JaPanese REtrospective multicenter stuDy of ThoracIc Endovascular Aortic Repair for Complicated Type B Aortic Dissection (J-Predictive Study)

Purpose To investigate the relationships between indications for thoracic endovascular aortic repair for acute/subacute complicated Stanford type B aortic dissection and clinical outcomes, and complications specific to thoracic endovascular aortic repair. Material and methods The J-predictive study...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Cardiovascular and interventional radiology 2022-03, Vol.45 (3), p.290-297
Hauptverfasser: Iwakoshi, Shinichi, Irie, Yoshihito, Katada, Yoshiaki, Sakaguchi, Shoji, Hongo, Norio, Oji, Katsuki, Fukuda, Tetsuya, Matsuda, Hitoshi, Kawasaki, Ryota, Taniguchi, Takanori, Motoki, Manabu, Hagihara, Makiyo, Kurimoto, Yoshihiko, Morikage, Noriyasu, Nishimaki, Hiroshi, Ogawa, Yukihisa, Sueyoshi, Eijun, Inoue, Kyozo, Shimizu, Hideyuki, Ideta, Ichiro, Higashigawa, Takatoshi, Ikeda, Osamu, Miyamoto, Naokazu, Nakai, Motoki, Nakai, Takahiro, Inoue, Takashi, Inoue, Takeshi, Ichihashi, Shigeo, Kichikawa, Kimihiko
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 297
container_issue 3
container_start_page 290
container_title Cardiovascular and interventional radiology
container_volume 45
creator Iwakoshi, Shinichi
Irie, Yoshihito
Katada, Yoshiaki
Sakaguchi, Shoji
Hongo, Norio
Oji, Katsuki
Fukuda, Tetsuya
Matsuda, Hitoshi
Kawasaki, Ryota
Taniguchi, Takanori
Motoki, Manabu
Hagihara, Makiyo
Kurimoto, Yoshihiko
Morikage, Noriyasu
Nishimaki, Hiroshi
Ogawa, Yukihisa
Sueyoshi, Eijun
Inoue, Kyozo
Shimizu, Hideyuki
Ideta, Ichiro
Higashigawa, Takatoshi
Ikeda, Osamu
Miyamoto, Naokazu
Nakai, Motoki
Nakai, Takahiro
Inoue, Takashi
Inoue, Takeshi
Ichihashi, Shigeo
Kichikawa, Kimihiko
description Purpose To investigate the relationships between indications for thoracic endovascular aortic repair for acute/subacute complicated Stanford type B aortic dissection and clinical outcomes, and complications specific to thoracic endovascular aortic repair. Material and methods The J-predictive study retrospectively collected data of patients treated with thoracic endovascular aortic repair for complicated Stanford type B aortic dissection at 20 institutions from January 2012 to March 2017. From the database, those treated for acute/subacute complicated Stanford type B aortic dissection were extracted ( n  = 118; 96 men; average age, 66.1 years; standard deviation, ± 13) and classified into groups 1, 2, and 3 according to thoracic endovascular aortic repair indications (rupture, superior mesenteric artery malperfusion, and renal or lower extremity malperfusion, respectively). Primary and secondary measures were mortality (overall and aortic-related) and complications related to thoracic endovascular aortic repair, respectively. For each outcome, the risks of being in groups 1 and 2 were statistically compared with that of being in group 3 as a control using Fisher’s exact test. Results Mortality rate (odds ratio, 5.22; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.33–20.53) and prevalence of paraparesis/paraplegia (odds ratio, 30.46; confidence interval, 1.71–541.77) were higher in group 1 than in group 3. Compared to group 3, group 2 showed no statistically significant differences in mortality or complications related to thoracic endovascular aortic repair. Conclusions Rupture as an indication for thoracic endovascular aortic repair for type B aortic dissection was more likely to result in worse mortality and high prevalence of spinal cord ischemia. Level of Evidence Level 4, Case series.
doi_str_mv 10.1007/s00270-021-03048-0
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2623890379</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2623890379</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c375t-80f3ced1b5e0dcbb19dd4875b7d130deb5034d06ce3464b9a01b39f0e7db1d93</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kk2P0zAQhgMCsaXwBzigkbgsh7DjOGlSTpS2QFcrbdVGiFvk2JPdrJK42M6i_nucdj8EElz8IT_zzuvRGwRvGH5giOmZRYxSDDFiIXKMsxCfBiMW8yjEbPLjWTBClsYhSxJ2Ery09gaRJVmUvAhOeIJZxng2evJprtudMLXVHegKLnsndUsWRKdgeGpqKVytOwuzVndXsPY36pyFX7W7hkVdVWT8HVadeiC9zkz2js62fSmGw6MSKdg60VXaKMj3O4LPMNPG1dJLWUtyEIDc0IEs95Avv882H2EhnIDK6BbcNcG5WIuOLMFm6Yy2u6HslqDtGy_kzZAB6_rFfjCSX2sj5ErCslP6VljZN8Lc99zQTtQGvJs_HP7T2Ol5uDbkP3rot3W92r9_FTyvRGPp9d0-DvIvy3z-Lby4_Lqazy5CydPEhRlWXJJiZUKoZFmyqVJxliZlqhhHRWWCPFY4kcTjSVxOBbKSTyukVJVMTfk4OD3K7oz-2ZN1RVtbSU3jJ6F7W0STiGdT5OmAvvsLvdG96bw5T_EsS-KEZZ6KjpT0I7SGqmJn6laYfcGwGOJVHONV-HgVh3j5dRy8vZPuy5bUQ8l9njzAj4D1T90Vmcfe_5H9DXT_4Ps</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2638854518</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Comparison of Outcomes and Complications Among Patients with Different Indications of Acute/Subacute Complicated Stanford Type B Aortic Dissection Treated by TEVAR: Data from the JaPanese REtrospective multicenter stuDy of ThoracIc Endovascular Aortic Repair for Complicated Type B Aortic Dissection (J-Predictive Study)</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>SpringerLink Journals - AutoHoldings</source><creator>Iwakoshi, Shinichi ; Irie, Yoshihito ; Katada, Yoshiaki ; Sakaguchi, Shoji ; Hongo, Norio ; Oji, Katsuki ; Fukuda, Tetsuya ; Matsuda, Hitoshi ; Kawasaki, Ryota ; Taniguchi, Takanori ; Motoki, Manabu ; Hagihara, Makiyo ; Kurimoto, Yoshihiko ; Morikage, Noriyasu ; Nishimaki, Hiroshi ; Ogawa, Yukihisa ; Sueyoshi, Eijun ; Inoue, Kyozo ; Shimizu, Hideyuki ; Ideta, Ichiro ; Higashigawa, Takatoshi ; Ikeda, Osamu ; Miyamoto, Naokazu ; Nakai, Motoki ; Nakai, Takahiro ; Inoue, Takashi ; Inoue, Takeshi ; Ichihashi, Shigeo ; Kichikawa, Kimihiko</creator><creatorcontrib>Iwakoshi, Shinichi ; Irie, Yoshihito ; Katada, Yoshiaki ; Sakaguchi, Shoji ; Hongo, Norio ; Oji, Katsuki ; Fukuda, Tetsuya ; Matsuda, Hitoshi ; Kawasaki, Ryota ; Taniguchi, Takanori ; Motoki, Manabu ; Hagihara, Makiyo ; Kurimoto, Yoshihiko ; Morikage, Noriyasu ; Nishimaki, Hiroshi ; Ogawa, Yukihisa ; Sueyoshi, Eijun ; Inoue, Kyozo ; Shimizu, Hideyuki ; Ideta, Ichiro ; Higashigawa, Takatoshi ; Ikeda, Osamu ; Miyamoto, Naokazu ; Nakai, Motoki ; Nakai, Takahiro ; Inoue, Takashi ; Inoue, Takeshi ; Ichihashi, Shigeo ; Kichikawa, Kimihiko</creatorcontrib><description>Purpose To investigate the relationships between indications for thoracic endovascular aortic repair for acute/subacute complicated Stanford type B aortic dissection and clinical outcomes, and complications specific to thoracic endovascular aortic repair. Material and methods The J-predictive study retrospectively collected data of patients treated with thoracic endovascular aortic repair for complicated Stanford type B aortic dissection at 20 institutions from January 2012 to March 2017. From the database, those treated for acute/subacute complicated Stanford type B aortic dissection were extracted ( n  = 118; 96 men; average age, 66.1 years; standard deviation, ± 13) and classified into groups 1, 2, and 3 according to thoracic endovascular aortic repair indications (rupture, superior mesenteric artery malperfusion, and renal or lower extremity malperfusion, respectively). Primary and secondary measures were mortality (overall and aortic-related) and complications related to thoracic endovascular aortic repair, respectively. For each outcome, the risks of being in groups 1 and 2 were statistically compared with that of being in group 3 as a control using Fisher’s exact test. Results Mortality rate (odds ratio, 5.22; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.33–20.53) and prevalence of paraparesis/paraplegia (odds ratio, 30.46; confidence interval, 1.71–541.77) were higher in group 1 than in group 3. Compared to group 3, group 2 showed no statistically significant differences in mortality or complications related to thoracic endovascular aortic repair. Conclusions Rupture as an indication for thoracic endovascular aortic repair for type B aortic dissection was more likely to result in worse mortality and high prevalence of spinal cord ischemia. Level of Evidence Level 4, Case series.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0174-1551</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1432-086X</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1007/s00270-021-03048-0</identifier><identifier>PMID: 35088138</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>New York: Springer US</publisher><subject>Aged ; Aneurysm, Dissecting - diagnostic imaging ; Aneurysm, Dissecting - surgery ; Aorta ; Aortic aneurysms ; Aortic dissection ; Arterial Interventions ; Cardiology ; Cardiovascular system ; Clinical Investigation ; Complications ; Confidence intervals ; Dissection ; Endovascular Procedures - adverse effects ; Female ; Humans ; Imaging ; Ischemia ; Japan - epidemiology ; Male ; Medicine ; Medicine &amp; Public Health ; Mortality ; Nuclear Medicine ; Paraplegia ; Paraplegics ; Patients ; Postoperative Complications - epidemiology ; Radiology ; Retrospective Studies ; Risk Factors ; Rupture ; Rupturing ; Spinal cord ; Statistical analysis ; Thorax ; Treatment Outcome ; Ultrasound</subject><ispartof>Cardiovascular and interventional radiology, 2022-03, Vol.45 (3), p.290-297</ispartof><rights>Springer Science+Business Media, LLC, part of Springer Nature and the Cardiovascular and Interventional Radiological Society of Europe (CIRSE) 2021</rights><rights>2021. Springer Science+Business Media, LLC, part of Springer Nature and the Cardiovascular and Interventional Radiological Society of Europe (CIRSE).</rights><rights>Springer Science+Business Media, LLC, part of Springer Nature and the Cardiovascular and Interventional Radiological Society of Europe (CIRSE) 2021.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c375t-80f3ced1b5e0dcbb19dd4875b7d130deb5034d06ce3464b9a01b39f0e7db1d93</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c375t-80f3ced1b5e0dcbb19dd4875b7d130deb5034d06ce3464b9a01b39f0e7db1d93</cites><orcidid>0000-0002-5145-274X</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1007/s00270-021-03048-0$$EPDF$$P50$$Gspringer$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://link.springer.com/10.1007/s00270-021-03048-0$$EHTML$$P50$$Gspringer$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,27901,27902,41464,42533,51294</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35088138$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Iwakoshi, Shinichi</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Irie, Yoshihito</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Katada, Yoshiaki</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sakaguchi, Shoji</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hongo, Norio</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Oji, Katsuki</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Fukuda, Tetsuya</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Matsuda, Hitoshi</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kawasaki, Ryota</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Taniguchi, Takanori</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Motoki, Manabu</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hagihara, Makiyo</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kurimoto, Yoshihiko</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Morikage, Noriyasu</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Nishimaki, Hiroshi</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ogawa, Yukihisa</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sueyoshi, Eijun</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Inoue, Kyozo</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Shimizu, Hideyuki</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ideta, Ichiro</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Higashigawa, Takatoshi</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ikeda, Osamu</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Miyamoto, Naokazu</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Nakai, Motoki</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Nakai, Takahiro</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Inoue, Takashi</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Inoue, Takeshi</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ichihashi, Shigeo</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kichikawa, Kimihiko</creatorcontrib><title>Comparison of Outcomes and Complications Among Patients with Different Indications of Acute/Subacute Complicated Stanford Type B Aortic Dissection Treated by TEVAR: Data from the JaPanese REtrospective multicenter stuDy of ThoracIc Endovascular Aortic Repair for Complicated Type B Aortic Dissection (J-Predictive Study)</title><title>Cardiovascular and interventional radiology</title><addtitle>Cardiovasc Intervent Radiol</addtitle><addtitle>Cardiovasc Intervent Radiol</addtitle><description>Purpose To investigate the relationships between indications for thoracic endovascular aortic repair for acute/subacute complicated Stanford type B aortic dissection and clinical outcomes, and complications specific to thoracic endovascular aortic repair. Material and methods The J-predictive study retrospectively collected data of patients treated with thoracic endovascular aortic repair for complicated Stanford type B aortic dissection at 20 institutions from January 2012 to March 2017. From the database, those treated for acute/subacute complicated Stanford type B aortic dissection were extracted ( n  = 118; 96 men; average age, 66.1 years; standard deviation, ± 13) and classified into groups 1, 2, and 3 according to thoracic endovascular aortic repair indications (rupture, superior mesenteric artery malperfusion, and renal or lower extremity malperfusion, respectively). Primary and secondary measures were mortality (overall and aortic-related) and complications related to thoracic endovascular aortic repair, respectively. For each outcome, the risks of being in groups 1 and 2 were statistically compared with that of being in group 3 as a control using Fisher’s exact test. Results Mortality rate (odds ratio, 5.22; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.33–20.53) and prevalence of paraparesis/paraplegia (odds ratio, 30.46; confidence interval, 1.71–541.77) were higher in group 1 than in group 3. Compared to group 3, group 2 showed no statistically significant differences in mortality or complications related to thoracic endovascular aortic repair. Conclusions Rupture as an indication for thoracic endovascular aortic repair for type B aortic dissection was more likely to result in worse mortality and high prevalence of spinal cord ischemia. Level of Evidence Level 4, Case series.</description><subject>Aged</subject><subject>Aneurysm, Dissecting - diagnostic imaging</subject><subject>Aneurysm, Dissecting - surgery</subject><subject>Aorta</subject><subject>Aortic aneurysms</subject><subject>Aortic dissection</subject><subject>Arterial Interventions</subject><subject>Cardiology</subject><subject>Cardiovascular system</subject><subject>Clinical Investigation</subject><subject>Complications</subject><subject>Confidence intervals</subject><subject>Dissection</subject><subject>Endovascular Procedures - adverse effects</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Imaging</subject><subject>Ischemia</subject><subject>Japan - epidemiology</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Medicine</subject><subject>Medicine &amp; Public Health</subject><subject>Mortality</subject><subject>Nuclear Medicine</subject><subject>Paraplegia</subject><subject>Paraplegics</subject><subject>Patients</subject><subject>Postoperative Complications - epidemiology</subject><subject>Radiology</subject><subject>Retrospective Studies</subject><subject>Risk Factors</subject><subject>Rupture</subject><subject>Rupturing</subject><subject>Spinal cord</subject><subject>Statistical analysis</subject><subject>Thorax</subject><subject>Treatment Outcome</subject><subject>Ultrasound</subject><issn>0174-1551</issn><issn>1432-086X</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2022</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><recordid>eNp9kk2P0zAQhgMCsaXwBzigkbgsh7DjOGlSTpS2QFcrbdVGiFvk2JPdrJK42M6i_nucdj8EElz8IT_zzuvRGwRvGH5giOmZRYxSDDFiIXKMsxCfBiMW8yjEbPLjWTBClsYhSxJ2Ery09gaRJVmUvAhOeIJZxng2evJprtudMLXVHegKLnsndUsWRKdgeGpqKVytOwuzVndXsPY36pyFX7W7hkVdVWT8HVadeiC9zkz2js62fSmGw6MSKdg60VXaKMj3O4LPMNPG1dJLWUtyEIDc0IEs95Avv882H2EhnIDK6BbcNcG5WIuOLMFm6Yy2u6HslqDtGy_kzZAB6_rFfjCSX2sj5ErCslP6VljZN8Lc99zQTtQGvJs_HP7T2Ol5uDbkP3rot3W92r9_FTyvRGPp9d0-DvIvy3z-Lby4_Lqazy5CydPEhRlWXJJiZUKoZFmyqVJxliZlqhhHRWWCPFY4kcTjSVxOBbKSTyukVJVMTfk4OD3K7oz-2ZN1RVtbSU3jJ6F7W0STiGdT5OmAvvsLvdG96bw5T_EsS-KEZZ6KjpT0I7SGqmJn6laYfcGwGOJVHONV-HgVh3j5dRy8vZPuy5bUQ8l9njzAj4D1T90Vmcfe_5H9DXT_4Ps</recordid><startdate>20220301</startdate><enddate>20220301</enddate><creator>Iwakoshi, Shinichi</creator><creator>Irie, Yoshihito</creator><creator>Katada, Yoshiaki</creator><creator>Sakaguchi, Shoji</creator><creator>Hongo, Norio</creator><creator>Oji, Katsuki</creator><creator>Fukuda, Tetsuya</creator><creator>Matsuda, Hitoshi</creator><creator>Kawasaki, Ryota</creator><creator>Taniguchi, Takanori</creator><creator>Motoki, Manabu</creator><creator>Hagihara, Makiyo</creator><creator>Kurimoto, Yoshihiko</creator><creator>Morikage, Noriyasu</creator><creator>Nishimaki, Hiroshi</creator><creator>Ogawa, Yukihisa</creator><creator>Sueyoshi, Eijun</creator><creator>Inoue, Kyozo</creator><creator>Shimizu, Hideyuki</creator><creator>Ideta, Ichiro</creator><creator>Higashigawa, Takatoshi</creator><creator>Ikeda, Osamu</creator><creator>Miyamoto, Naokazu</creator><creator>Nakai, Motoki</creator><creator>Nakai, Takahiro</creator><creator>Inoue, Takashi</creator><creator>Inoue, Takeshi</creator><creator>Ichihashi, Shigeo</creator><creator>Kichikawa, Kimihiko</creator><general>Springer US</general><general>Springer Nature B.V</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7RV</scope><scope>7TO</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88E</scope><scope>8AO</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>H94</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>KB0</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>M1P</scope><scope>NAPCQ</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>7X8</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5145-274X</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20220301</creationdate><title>Comparison of Outcomes and Complications Among Patients with Different Indications of Acute/Subacute Complicated Stanford Type B Aortic Dissection Treated by TEVAR: Data from the JaPanese REtrospective multicenter stuDy of ThoracIc Endovascular Aortic Repair for Complicated Type B Aortic Dissection (J-Predictive Study)</title><author>Iwakoshi, Shinichi ; Irie, Yoshihito ; Katada, Yoshiaki ; Sakaguchi, Shoji ; Hongo, Norio ; Oji, Katsuki ; Fukuda, Tetsuya ; Matsuda, Hitoshi ; Kawasaki, Ryota ; Taniguchi, Takanori ; Motoki, Manabu ; Hagihara, Makiyo ; Kurimoto, Yoshihiko ; Morikage, Noriyasu ; Nishimaki, Hiroshi ; Ogawa, Yukihisa ; Sueyoshi, Eijun ; Inoue, Kyozo ; Shimizu, Hideyuki ; Ideta, Ichiro ; Higashigawa, Takatoshi ; Ikeda, Osamu ; Miyamoto, Naokazu ; Nakai, Motoki ; Nakai, Takahiro ; Inoue, Takashi ; Inoue, Takeshi ; Ichihashi, Shigeo ; Kichikawa, Kimihiko</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c375t-80f3ced1b5e0dcbb19dd4875b7d130deb5034d06ce3464b9a01b39f0e7db1d93</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2022</creationdate><topic>Aged</topic><topic>Aneurysm, Dissecting - diagnostic imaging</topic><topic>Aneurysm, Dissecting - surgery</topic><topic>Aorta</topic><topic>Aortic aneurysms</topic><topic>Aortic dissection</topic><topic>Arterial Interventions</topic><topic>Cardiology</topic><topic>Cardiovascular system</topic><topic>Clinical Investigation</topic><topic>Complications</topic><topic>Confidence intervals</topic><topic>Dissection</topic><topic>Endovascular Procedures - adverse effects</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Imaging</topic><topic>Ischemia</topic><topic>Japan - epidemiology</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Medicine</topic><topic>Medicine &amp; Public Health</topic><topic>Mortality</topic><topic>Nuclear Medicine</topic><topic>Paraplegia</topic><topic>Paraplegics</topic><topic>Patients</topic><topic>Postoperative Complications - epidemiology</topic><topic>Radiology</topic><topic>Retrospective Studies</topic><topic>Risk Factors</topic><topic>Rupture</topic><topic>Rupturing</topic><topic>Spinal cord</topic><topic>Statistical analysis</topic><topic>Thorax</topic><topic>Treatment Outcome</topic><topic>Ultrasound</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Iwakoshi, Shinichi</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Irie, Yoshihito</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Katada, Yoshiaki</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sakaguchi, Shoji</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hongo, Norio</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Oji, Katsuki</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Fukuda, Tetsuya</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Matsuda, Hitoshi</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kawasaki, Ryota</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Taniguchi, Takanori</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Motoki, Manabu</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hagihara, Makiyo</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kurimoto, Yoshihiko</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Morikage, Noriyasu</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Nishimaki, Hiroshi</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ogawa, Yukihisa</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sueyoshi, Eijun</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Inoue, Kyozo</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Shimizu, Hideyuki</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ideta, Ichiro</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Higashigawa, Takatoshi</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ikeda, Osamu</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Miyamoto, Naokazu</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Nakai, Motoki</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Nakai, Takahiro</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Inoue, Takashi</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Inoue, Takeshi</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ichihashi, Shigeo</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kichikawa, Kimihiko</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Nursing &amp; Allied Health Database</collection><collection>Oncogenes and Growth Factors Abstracts</collection><collection>Health &amp; Medical Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Medical Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Pharma Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>AIDS and Cancer Research Abstracts</collection><collection>ProQuest Health &amp; Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Nursing &amp; Allied Health Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Health &amp; Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Medical Database</collection><collection>Nursing &amp; Allied Health Premium</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Cardiovascular and interventional radiology</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Iwakoshi, Shinichi</au><au>Irie, Yoshihito</au><au>Katada, Yoshiaki</au><au>Sakaguchi, Shoji</au><au>Hongo, Norio</au><au>Oji, Katsuki</au><au>Fukuda, Tetsuya</au><au>Matsuda, Hitoshi</au><au>Kawasaki, Ryota</au><au>Taniguchi, Takanori</au><au>Motoki, Manabu</au><au>Hagihara, Makiyo</au><au>Kurimoto, Yoshihiko</au><au>Morikage, Noriyasu</au><au>Nishimaki, Hiroshi</au><au>Ogawa, Yukihisa</au><au>Sueyoshi, Eijun</au><au>Inoue, Kyozo</au><au>Shimizu, Hideyuki</au><au>Ideta, Ichiro</au><au>Higashigawa, Takatoshi</au><au>Ikeda, Osamu</au><au>Miyamoto, Naokazu</au><au>Nakai, Motoki</au><au>Nakai, Takahiro</au><au>Inoue, Takashi</au><au>Inoue, Takeshi</au><au>Ichihashi, Shigeo</au><au>Kichikawa, Kimihiko</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Comparison of Outcomes and Complications Among Patients with Different Indications of Acute/Subacute Complicated Stanford Type B Aortic Dissection Treated by TEVAR: Data from the JaPanese REtrospective multicenter stuDy of ThoracIc Endovascular Aortic Repair for Complicated Type B Aortic Dissection (J-Predictive Study)</atitle><jtitle>Cardiovascular and interventional radiology</jtitle><stitle>Cardiovasc Intervent Radiol</stitle><addtitle>Cardiovasc Intervent Radiol</addtitle><date>2022-03-01</date><risdate>2022</risdate><volume>45</volume><issue>3</issue><spage>290</spage><epage>297</epage><pages>290-297</pages><issn>0174-1551</issn><eissn>1432-086X</eissn><abstract>Purpose To investigate the relationships between indications for thoracic endovascular aortic repair for acute/subacute complicated Stanford type B aortic dissection and clinical outcomes, and complications specific to thoracic endovascular aortic repair. Material and methods The J-predictive study retrospectively collected data of patients treated with thoracic endovascular aortic repair for complicated Stanford type B aortic dissection at 20 institutions from January 2012 to March 2017. From the database, those treated for acute/subacute complicated Stanford type B aortic dissection were extracted ( n  = 118; 96 men; average age, 66.1 years; standard deviation, ± 13) and classified into groups 1, 2, and 3 according to thoracic endovascular aortic repair indications (rupture, superior mesenteric artery malperfusion, and renal or lower extremity malperfusion, respectively). Primary and secondary measures were mortality (overall and aortic-related) and complications related to thoracic endovascular aortic repair, respectively. For each outcome, the risks of being in groups 1 and 2 were statistically compared with that of being in group 3 as a control using Fisher’s exact test. Results Mortality rate (odds ratio, 5.22; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.33–20.53) and prevalence of paraparesis/paraplegia (odds ratio, 30.46; confidence interval, 1.71–541.77) were higher in group 1 than in group 3. Compared to group 3, group 2 showed no statistically significant differences in mortality or complications related to thoracic endovascular aortic repair. Conclusions Rupture as an indication for thoracic endovascular aortic repair for type B aortic dissection was more likely to result in worse mortality and high prevalence of spinal cord ischemia. Level of Evidence Level 4, Case series.</abstract><cop>New York</cop><pub>Springer US</pub><pmid>35088138</pmid><doi>10.1007/s00270-021-03048-0</doi><tpages>8</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5145-274X</orcidid></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0174-1551
ispartof Cardiovascular and interventional radiology, 2022-03, Vol.45 (3), p.290-297
issn 0174-1551
1432-086X
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2623890379
source MEDLINE; SpringerLink Journals - AutoHoldings
subjects Aged
Aneurysm, Dissecting - diagnostic imaging
Aneurysm, Dissecting - surgery
Aorta
Aortic aneurysms
Aortic dissection
Arterial Interventions
Cardiology
Cardiovascular system
Clinical Investigation
Complications
Confidence intervals
Dissection
Endovascular Procedures - adverse effects
Female
Humans
Imaging
Ischemia
Japan - epidemiology
Male
Medicine
Medicine & Public Health
Mortality
Nuclear Medicine
Paraplegia
Paraplegics
Patients
Postoperative Complications - epidemiology
Radiology
Retrospective Studies
Risk Factors
Rupture
Rupturing
Spinal cord
Statistical analysis
Thorax
Treatment Outcome
Ultrasound
title Comparison of Outcomes and Complications Among Patients with Different Indications of Acute/Subacute Complicated Stanford Type B Aortic Dissection Treated by TEVAR: Data from the JaPanese REtrospective multicenter stuDy of ThoracIc Endovascular Aortic Repair for Complicated Type B Aortic Dissection (J-Predictive Study)
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-09T03%3A49%3A43IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Comparison%20of%20Outcomes%20and%20Complications%20Among%20Patients%20with%20Different%20Indications%20of%20Acute/Subacute%20Complicated%20Stanford%20Type%20B%20Aortic%20Dissection%20Treated%20by%20TEVAR:%20Data%20from%20the%20JaPanese%20REtrospective%20multicenter%20stuDy%20of%20ThoracIc%20Endovascular%20Aortic%20Repair%20for%20Complicated%20Type%20B%20Aortic%20Dissection%20(J-Predictive%20Study)&rft.jtitle=Cardiovascular%20and%20interventional%20radiology&rft.au=Iwakoshi,%20Shinichi&rft.date=2022-03-01&rft.volume=45&rft.issue=3&rft.spage=290&rft.epage=297&rft.pages=290-297&rft.issn=0174-1551&rft.eissn=1432-086X&rft_id=info:doi/10.1007/s00270-021-03048-0&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2623890379%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2638854518&rft_id=info:pmid/35088138&rfr_iscdi=true