A review of electronic medical records and safe transfusion practice for guideline development

Background and Objectives Electronic medical records (EMRs) are often composed of multiple interlinking systems, each serving a particular task, including transfusion ordering and administration. Transfusion may not be prioritized when developing or implementing electronic platforms. Uniform guideli...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Vox sanguinis 2022-06, Vol.117 (6), p.761-768
Hauptverfasser: Crispin, Philip, Akers, Christine, Brown, Kristen, Delaforce, Alana, Keegan, Anastazia, King, Fiona, Ormerod, Amanda, Verrall, Trudi
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 768
container_issue 6
container_start_page 761
container_title Vox sanguinis
container_volume 117
creator Crispin, Philip
Akers, Christine
Brown, Kristen
Delaforce, Alana
Keegan, Anastazia
King, Fiona
Ormerod, Amanda
Verrall, Trudi
description Background and Objectives Electronic medical records (EMRs) are often composed of multiple interlinking systems, each serving a particular task, including transfusion ordering and administration. Transfusion may not be prioritized when developing or implementing electronic platforms. Uniform guidelines may assist information technology (IT) developers, institutions and healthcare workforces to progress with shared goals. Materials and Methods A narrative review of current clinical guidance, benefits and risks of electronic systems for clinical transfusion practice was combined with feedback from experienced transfusion practitioners. Results There is opportunity to improve the safety, quality and efficiency of transfusion practice, particularly through decision support and better identification procedures, by incorporating transfusion practice into EMRs. However, these benefits should not be assumed, as poorly designed processes within the electronic systems and the critically important electronic–human process interfaces may increase risk while creating the impression of safety. Conclusion Guidelines should enable healthcare and IT industries to work constructively together so that each implementation provides assurance of safe practice.
doi_str_mv 10.1111/vox.13254
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2623890369</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2676561940</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3884-fca98f51ade93c851974f52ed71ba50c6234f46fd130037080720336f3e2e5a3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp1kEtLxDAQgIMouj4O_gEJeNFDdfJq06OILxD2sognS0wnEuk2a9Ku-u-NrnoQnMsc5uNj-AjZZ3DC8pwuw9sJE1zJNTJhkosCJIN1MgGQvKgBqi2yndIzAGiu1SbZEgp0XQJMyMMZjbj0-EqDo9ihHWLovaVzbL01XT7aENtETd_SZBzSIZo-uTH50NNFNHbwFqkLkT6NvsXO90hbXGIXFnPsh12y4UyXcO9775DZ5cXs_Lq4nV7dnJ_dFlZoLQtnTa2dYqbFWlitWF1Jpzi2FXs0CmzJhXSydC0TAKICDRUHIUonkKMyYoccrbSLGF5GTEMz98li15kew5gangW6BlHWGT38gz6HMfb5uUxVpSpZLSFTxyvKxpBSRNcsop-b-N4waD6bN7l589U8swffxvExZ_slfyJn4HQFvPoO3_83NXfT-5XyA_Rsir4</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2676561940</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>A review of electronic medical records and safe transfusion practice for guideline development</title><source>Wiley Online Library Journals Frontfile Complete</source><creator>Crispin, Philip ; Akers, Christine ; Brown, Kristen ; Delaforce, Alana ; Keegan, Anastazia ; King, Fiona ; Ormerod, Amanda ; Verrall, Trudi</creator><creatorcontrib>Crispin, Philip ; Akers, Christine ; Brown, Kristen ; Delaforce, Alana ; Keegan, Anastazia ; King, Fiona ; Ormerod, Amanda ; Verrall, Trudi</creatorcontrib><description>Background and Objectives Electronic medical records (EMRs) are often composed of multiple interlinking systems, each serving a particular task, including transfusion ordering and administration. Transfusion may not be prioritized when developing or implementing electronic platforms. Uniform guidelines may assist information technology (IT) developers, institutions and healthcare workforces to progress with shared goals. Materials and Methods A narrative review of current clinical guidance, benefits and risks of electronic systems for clinical transfusion practice was combined with feedback from experienced transfusion practitioners. Results There is opportunity to improve the safety, quality and efficiency of transfusion practice, particularly through decision support and better identification procedures, by incorporating transfusion practice into EMRs. However, these benefits should not be assumed, as poorly designed processes within the electronic systems and the critically important electronic–human process interfaces may increase risk while creating the impression of safety. Conclusion Guidelines should enable healthcare and IT industries to work constructively together so that each implementation provides assurance of safe practice.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0042-9007</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1423-0410</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1111/vox.13254</identifier><identifier>PMID: 35089600</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Oxford, UK: Blackwell Publishing Ltd</publisher><subject>decision support ; Electronic health records ; Electronic medical records ; Electronic systems ; Guidelines ; Health care ; Information technology ; Interfaces ; Medical records ; patient identification ; Safety ; Transfusion</subject><ispartof>Vox sanguinis, 2022-06, Vol.117 (6), p.761-768</ispartof><rights>2022 International Society of Blood Transfusion.</rights><rights>Copyright Vox Sanguinis © 2022 International Society of Blood Transfusion</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3884-fca98f51ade93c851974f52ed71ba50c6234f46fd130037080720336f3e2e5a3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3884-fca98f51ade93c851974f52ed71ba50c6234f46fd130037080720336f3e2e5a3</cites><orcidid>0000-0002-3931-2875 ; 0000-0002-4124-4971 ; 0000-0002-0795-7521</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1111%2Fvox.13254$$EPDF$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1111%2Fvox.13254$$EHTML$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,1411,27901,27902,45550,45551</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35089600$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Crispin, Philip</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Akers, Christine</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Brown, Kristen</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Delaforce, Alana</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Keegan, Anastazia</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>King, Fiona</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ormerod, Amanda</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Verrall, Trudi</creatorcontrib><title>A review of electronic medical records and safe transfusion practice for guideline development</title><title>Vox sanguinis</title><addtitle>Vox Sang</addtitle><description>Background and Objectives Electronic medical records (EMRs) are often composed of multiple interlinking systems, each serving a particular task, including transfusion ordering and administration. Transfusion may not be prioritized when developing or implementing electronic platforms. Uniform guidelines may assist information technology (IT) developers, institutions and healthcare workforces to progress with shared goals. Materials and Methods A narrative review of current clinical guidance, benefits and risks of electronic systems for clinical transfusion practice was combined with feedback from experienced transfusion practitioners. Results There is opportunity to improve the safety, quality and efficiency of transfusion practice, particularly through decision support and better identification procedures, by incorporating transfusion practice into EMRs. However, these benefits should not be assumed, as poorly designed processes within the electronic systems and the critically important electronic–human process interfaces may increase risk while creating the impression of safety. Conclusion Guidelines should enable healthcare and IT industries to work constructively together so that each implementation provides assurance of safe practice.</description><subject>decision support</subject><subject>Electronic health records</subject><subject>Electronic medical records</subject><subject>Electronic systems</subject><subject>Guidelines</subject><subject>Health care</subject><subject>Information technology</subject><subject>Interfaces</subject><subject>Medical records</subject><subject>patient identification</subject><subject>Safety</subject><subject>Transfusion</subject><issn>0042-9007</issn><issn>1423-0410</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2022</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNp1kEtLxDAQgIMouj4O_gEJeNFDdfJq06OILxD2sognS0wnEuk2a9Ku-u-NrnoQnMsc5uNj-AjZZ3DC8pwuw9sJE1zJNTJhkosCJIN1MgGQvKgBqi2yndIzAGiu1SbZEgp0XQJMyMMZjbj0-EqDo9ihHWLovaVzbL01XT7aENtETd_SZBzSIZo-uTH50NNFNHbwFqkLkT6NvsXO90hbXGIXFnPsh12y4UyXcO9775DZ5cXs_Lq4nV7dnJ_dFlZoLQtnTa2dYqbFWlitWF1Jpzi2FXs0CmzJhXSydC0TAKICDRUHIUonkKMyYoccrbSLGF5GTEMz98li15kew5gangW6BlHWGT38gz6HMfb5uUxVpSpZLSFTxyvKxpBSRNcsop-b-N4waD6bN7l589U8swffxvExZ_slfyJn4HQFvPoO3_83NXfT-5XyA_Rsir4</recordid><startdate>202206</startdate><enddate>202206</enddate><creator>Crispin, Philip</creator><creator>Akers, Christine</creator><creator>Brown, Kristen</creator><creator>Delaforce, Alana</creator><creator>Keegan, Anastazia</creator><creator>King, Fiona</creator><creator>Ormerod, Amanda</creator><creator>Verrall, Trudi</creator><general>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</general><general>S. Karger AG</general><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7QL</scope><scope>7T5</scope><scope>7TM</scope><scope>7U9</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>H94</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>M7N</scope><scope>7X8</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3931-2875</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4124-4971</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0795-7521</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>202206</creationdate><title>A review of electronic medical records and safe transfusion practice for guideline development</title><author>Crispin, Philip ; Akers, Christine ; Brown, Kristen ; Delaforce, Alana ; Keegan, Anastazia ; King, Fiona ; Ormerod, Amanda ; Verrall, Trudi</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c3884-fca98f51ade93c851974f52ed71ba50c6234f46fd130037080720336f3e2e5a3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2022</creationdate><topic>decision support</topic><topic>Electronic health records</topic><topic>Electronic medical records</topic><topic>Electronic systems</topic><topic>Guidelines</topic><topic>Health care</topic><topic>Information technology</topic><topic>Interfaces</topic><topic>Medical records</topic><topic>patient identification</topic><topic>Safety</topic><topic>Transfusion</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Crispin, Philip</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Akers, Christine</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Brown, Kristen</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Delaforce, Alana</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Keegan, Anastazia</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>King, Fiona</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ormerod, Amanda</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Verrall, Trudi</creatorcontrib><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Bacteriology Abstracts (Microbiology B)</collection><collection>Immunology Abstracts</collection><collection>Nucleic Acids Abstracts</collection><collection>Virology and AIDS Abstracts</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>AIDS and Cancer Research Abstracts</collection><collection>ProQuest Health &amp; Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Algology Mycology and Protozoology Abstracts (Microbiology C)</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Vox sanguinis</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Crispin, Philip</au><au>Akers, Christine</au><au>Brown, Kristen</au><au>Delaforce, Alana</au><au>Keegan, Anastazia</au><au>King, Fiona</au><au>Ormerod, Amanda</au><au>Verrall, Trudi</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>A review of electronic medical records and safe transfusion practice for guideline development</atitle><jtitle>Vox sanguinis</jtitle><addtitle>Vox Sang</addtitle><date>2022-06</date><risdate>2022</risdate><volume>117</volume><issue>6</issue><spage>761</spage><epage>768</epage><pages>761-768</pages><issn>0042-9007</issn><eissn>1423-0410</eissn><abstract>Background and Objectives Electronic medical records (EMRs) are often composed of multiple interlinking systems, each serving a particular task, including transfusion ordering and administration. Transfusion may not be prioritized when developing or implementing electronic platforms. Uniform guidelines may assist information technology (IT) developers, institutions and healthcare workforces to progress with shared goals. Materials and Methods A narrative review of current clinical guidance, benefits and risks of electronic systems for clinical transfusion practice was combined with feedback from experienced transfusion practitioners. Results There is opportunity to improve the safety, quality and efficiency of transfusion practice, particularly through decision support and better identification procedures, by incorporating transfusion practice into EMRs. However, these benefits should not be assumed, as poorly designed processes within the electronic systems and the critically important electronic–human process interfaces may increase risk while creating the impression of safety. Conclusion Guidelines should enable healthcare and IT industries to work constructively together so that each implementation provides assurance of safe practice.</abstract><cop>Oxford, UK</cop><pub>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</pub><pmid>35089600</pmid><doi>10.1111/vox.13254</doi><tpages>8</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3931-2875</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4124-4971</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0795-7521</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0042-9007
ispartof Vox sanguinis, 2022-06, Vol.117 (6), p.761-768
issn 0042-9007
1423-0410
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2623890369
source Wiley Online Library Journals Frontfile Complete
subjects decision support
Electronic health records
Electronic medical records
Electronic systems
Guidelines
Health care
Information technology
Interfaces
Medical records
patient identification
Safety
Transfusion
title A review of electronic medical records and safe transfusion practice for guideline development
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-10T08%3A32%3A53IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=A%20review%20of%20electronic%20medical%20records%20and%20safe%20transfusion%20practice%20for%20guideline%20development&rft.jtitle=Vox%20sanguinis&rft.au=Crispin,%20Philip&rft.date=2022-06&rft.volume=117&rft.issue=6&rft.spage=761&rft.epage=768&rft.pages=761-768&rft.issn=0042-9007&rft.eissn=1423-0410&rft_id=info:doi/10.1111/vox.13254&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2676561940%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2676561940&rft_id=info:pmid/35089600&rfr_iscdi=true