A review of electronic medical records and safe transfusion practice for guideline development
Background and Objectives Electronic medical records (EMRs) are often composed of multiple interlinking systems, each serving a particular task, including transfusion ordering and administration. Transfusion may not be prioritized when developing or implementing electronic platforms. Uniform guideli...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Vox sanguinis 2022-06, Vol.117 (6), p.761-768 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 768 |
---|---|
container_issue | 6 |
container_start_page | 761 |
container_title | Vox sanguinis |
container_volume | 117 |
creator | Crispin, Philip Akers, Christine Brown, Kristen Delaforce, Alana Keegan, Anastazia King, Fiona Ormerod, Amanda Verrall, Trudi |
description | Background and Objectives
Electronic medical records (EMRs) are often composed of multiple interlinking systems, each serving a particular task, including transfusion ordering and administration. Transfusion may not be prioritized when developing or implementing electronic platforms. Uniform guidelines may assist information technology (IT) developers, institutions and healthcare workforces to progress with shared goals.
Materials and Methods
A narrative review of current clinical guidance, benefits and risks of electronic systems for clinical transfusion practice was combined with feedback from experienced transfusion practitioners.
Results
There is opportunity to improve the safety, quality and efficiency of transfusion practice, particularly through decision support and better identification procedures, by incorporating transfusion practice into EMRs. However, these benefits should not be assumed, as poorly designed processes within the electronic systems and the critically important electronic–human process interfaces may increase risk while creating the impression of safety.
Conclusion
Guidelines should enable healthcare and IT industries to work constructively together so that each implementation provides assurance of safe practice. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1111/vox.13254 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2623890369</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2676561940</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3884-fca98f51ade93c851974f52ed71ba50c6234f46fd130037080720336f3e2e5a3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp1kEtLxDAQgIMouj4O_gEJeNFDdfJq06OILxD2sognS0wnEuk2a9Ku-u-NrnoQnMsc5uNj-AjZZ3DC8pwuw9sJE1zJNTJhkosCJIN1MgGQvKgBqi2yndIzAGiu1SbZEgp0XQJMyMMZjbj0-EqDo9ihHWLovaVzbL01XT7aENtETd_SZBzSIZo-uTH50NNFNHbwFqkLkT6NvsXO90hbXGIXFnPsh12y4UyXcO9775DZ5cXs_Lq4nV7dnJ_dFlZoLQtnTa2dYqbFWlitWF1Jpzi2FXs0CmzJhXSydC0TAKICDRUHIUonkKMyYoccrbSLGF5GTEMz98li15kew5gangW6BlHWGT38gz6HMfb5uUxVpSpZLSFTxyvKxpBSRNcsop-b-N4waD6bN7l589U8swffxvExZ_slfyJn4HQFvPoO3_83NXfT-5XyA_Rsir4</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2676561940</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>A review of electronic medical records and safe transfusion practice for guideline development</title><source>Wiley Online Library Journals Frontfile Complete</source><creator>Crispin, Philip ; Akers, Christine ; Brown, Kristen ; Delaforce, Alana ; Keegan, Anastazia ; King, Fiona ; Ormerod, Amanda ; Verrall, Trudi</creator><creatorcontrib>Crispin, Philip ; Akers, Christine ; Brown, Kristen ; Delaforce, Alana ; Keegan, Anastazia ; King, Fiona ; Ormerod, Amanda ; Verrall, Trudi</creatorcontrib><description>Background and Objectives
Electronic medical records (EMRs) are often composed of multiple interlinking systems, each serving a particular task, including transfusion ordering and administration. Transfusion may not be prioritized when developing or implementing electronic platforms. Uniform guidelines may assist information technology (IT) developers, institutions and healthcare workforces to progress with shared goals.
Materials and Methods
A narrative review of current clinical guidance, benefits and risks of electronic systems for clinical transfusion practice was combined with feedback from experienced transfusion practitioners.
Results
There is opportunity to improve the safety, quality and efficiency of transfusion practice, particularly through decision support and better identification procedures, by incorporating transfusion practice into EMRs. However, these benefits should not be assumed, as poorly designed processes within the electronic systems and the critically important electronic–human process interfaces may increase risk while creating the impression of safety.
Conclusion
Guidelines should enable healthcare and IT industries to work constructively together so that each implementation provides assurance of safe practice.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0042-9007</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1423-0410</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1111/vox.13254</identifier><identifier>PMID: 35089600</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Oxford, UK: Blackwell Publishing Ltd</publisher><subject>decision support ; Electronic health records ; Electronic medical records ; Electronic systems ; Guidelines ; Health care ; Information technology ; Interfaces ; Medical records ; patient identification ; Safety ; Transfusion</subject><ispartof>Vox sanguinis, 2022-06, Vol.117 (6), p.761-768</ispartof><rights>2022 International Society of Blood Transfusion.</rights><rights>Copyright Vox Sanguinis © 2022 International Society of Blood Transfusion</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3884-fca98f51ade93c851974f52ed71ba50c6234f46fd130037080720336f3e2e5a3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3884-fca98f51ade93c851974f52ed71ba50c6234f46fd130037080720336f3e2e5a3</cites><orcidid>0000-0002-3931-2875 ; 0000-0002-4124-4971 ; 0000-0002-0795-7521</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1111%2Fvox.13254$$EPDF$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1111%2Fvox.13254$$EHTML$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,1411,27901,27902,45550,45551</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35089600$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Crispin, Philip</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Akers, Christine</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Brown, Kristen</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Delaforce, Alana</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Keegan, Anastazia</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>King, Fiona</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ormerod, Amanda</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Verrall, Trudi</creatorcontrib><title>A review of electronic medical records and safe transfusion practice for guideline development</title><title>Vox sanguinis</title><addtitle>Vox Sang</addtitle><description>Background and Objectives
Electronic medical records (EMRs) are often composed of multiple interlinking systems, each serving a particular task, including transfusion ordering and administration. Transfusion may not be prioritized when developing or implementing electronic platforms. Uniform guidelines may assist information technology (IT) developers, institutions and healthcare workforces to progress with shared goals.
Materials and Methods
A narrative review of current clinical guidance, benefits and risks of electronic systems for clinical transfusion practice was combined with feedback from experienced transfusion practitioners.
Results
There is opportunity to improve the safety, quality and efficiency of transfusion practice, particularly through decision support and better identification procedures, by incorporating transfusion practice into EMRs. However, these benefits should not be assumed, as poorly designed processes within the electronic systems and the critically important electronic–human process interfaces may increase risk while creating the impression of safety.
Conclusion
Guidelines should enable healthcare and IT industries to work constructively together so that each implementation provides assurance of safe practice.</description><subject>decision support</subject><subject>Electronic health records</subject><subject>Electronic medical records</subject><subject>Electronic systems</subject><subject>Guidelines</subject><subject>Health care</subject><subject>Information technology</subject><subject>Interfaces</subject><subject>Medical records</subject><subject>patient identification</subject><subject>Safety</subject><subject>Transfusion</subject><issn>0042-9007</issn><issn>1423-0410</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2022</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNp1kEtLxDAQgIMouj4O_gEJeNFDdfJq06OILxD2sognS0wnEuk2a9Ku-u-NrnoQnMsc5uNj-AjZZ3DC8pwuw9sJE1zJNTJhkosCJIN1MgGQvKgBqi2yndIzAGiu1SbZEgp0XQJMyMMZjbj0-EqDo9ihHWLovaVzbL01XT7aENtETd_SZBzSIZo-uTH50NNFNHbwFqkLkT6NvsXO90hbXGIXFnPsh12y4UyXcO9775DZ5cXs_Lq4nV7dnJ_dFlZoLQtnTa2dYqbFWlitWF1Jpzi2FXs0CmzJhXSydC0TAKICDRUHIUonkKMyYoccrbSLGF5GTEMz98li15kew5gangW6BlHWGT38gz6HMfb5uUxVpSpZLSFTxyvKxpBSRNcsop-b-N4waD6bN7l589U8swffxvExZ_slfyJn4HQFvPoO3_83NXfT-5XyA_Rsir4</recordid><startdate>202206</startdate><enddate>202206</enddate><creator>Crispin, Philip</creator><creator>Akers, Christine</creator><creator>Brown, Kristen</creator><creator>Delaforce, Alana</creator><creator>Keegan, Anastazia</creator><creator>King, Fiona</creator><creator>Ormerod, Amanda</creator><creator>Verrall, Trudi</creator><general>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</general><general>S. Karger AG</general><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7QL</scope><scope>7T5</scope><scope>7TM</scope><scope>7U9</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>H94</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>M7N</scope><scope>7X8</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3931-2875</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4124-4971</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0795-7521</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>202206</creationdate><title>A review of electronic medical records and safe transfusion practice for guideline development</title><author>Crispin, Philip ; Akers, Christine ; Brown, Kristen ; Delaforce, Alana ; Keegan, Anastazia ; King, Fiona ; Ormerod, Amanda ; Verrall, Trudi</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c3884-fca98f51ade93c851974f52ed71ba50c6234f46fd130037080720336f3e2e5a3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2022</creationdate><topic>decision support</topic><topic>Electronic health records</topic><topic>Electronic medical records</topic><topic>Electronic systems</topic><topic>Guidelines</topic><topic>Health care</topic><topic>Information technology</topic><topic>Interfaces</topic><topic>Medical records</topic><topic>patient identification</topic><topic>Safety</topic><topic>Transfusion</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Crispin, Philip</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Akers, Christine</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Brown, Kristen</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Delaforce, Alana</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Keegan, Anastazia</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>King, Fiona</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ormerod, Amanda</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Verrall, Trudi</creatorcontrib><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Bacteriology Abstracts (Microbiology B)</collection><collection>Immunology Abstracts</collection><collection>Nucleic Acids Abstracts</collection><collection>Virology and AIDS Abstracts</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>AIDS and Cancer Research Abstracts</collection><collection>ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Algology Mycology and Protozoology Abstracts (Microbiology C)</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Vox sanguinis</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Crispin, Philip</au><au>Akers, Christine</au><au>Brown, Kristen</au><au>Delaforce, Alana</au><au>Keegan, Anastazia</au><au>King, Fiona</au><au>Ormerod, Amanda</au><au>Verrall, Trudi</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>A review of electronic medical records and safe transfusion practice for guideline development</atitle><jtitle>Vox sanguinis</jtitle><addtitle>Vox Sang</addtitle><date>2022-06</date><risdate>2022</risdate><volume>117</volume><issue>6</issue><spage>761</spage><epage>768</epage><pages>761-768</pages><issn>0042-9007</issn><eissn>1423-0410</eissn><abstract>Background and Objectives
Electronic medical records (EMRs) are often composed of multiple interlinking systems, each serving a particular task, including transfusion ordering and administration. Transfusion may not be prioritized when developing or implementing electronic platforms. Uniform guidelines may assist information technology (IT) developers, institutions and healthcare workforces to progress with shared goals.
Materials and Methods
A narrative review of current clinical guidance, benefits and risks of electronic systems for clinical transfusion practice was combined with feedback from experienced transfusion practitioners.
Results
There is opportunity to improve the safety, quality and efficiency of transfusion practice, particularly through decision support and better identification procedures, by incorporating transfusion practice into EMRs. However, these benefits should not be assumed, as poorly designed processes within the electronic systems and the critically important electronic–human process interfaces may increase risk while creating the impression of safety.
Conclusion
Guidelines should enable healthcare and IT industries to work constructively together so that each implementation provides assurance of safe practice.</abstract><cop>Oxford, UK</cop><pub>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</pub><pmid>35089600</pmid><doi>10.1111/vox.13254</doi><tpages>8</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3931-2875</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4124-4971</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0795-7521</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0042-9007 |
ispartof | Vox sanguinis, 2022-06, Vol.117 (6), p.761-768 |
issn | 0042-9007 1423-0410 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2623890369 |
source | Wiley Online Library Journals Frontfile Complete |
subjects | decision support Electronic health records Electronic medical records Electronic systems Guidelines Health care Information technology Interfaces Medical records patient identification Safety Transfusion |
title | A review of electronic medical records and safe transfusion practice for guideline development |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-10T08%3A32%3A53IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=A%20review%20of%20electronic%20medical%20records%20and%20safe%20transfusion%20practice%20for%20guideline%20development&rft.jtitle=Vox%20sanguinis&rft.au=Crispin,%20Philip&rft.date=2022-06&rft.volume=117&rft.issue=6&rft.spage=761&rft.epage=768&rft.pages=761-768&rft.issn=0042-9007&rft.eissn=1423-0410&rft_id=info:doi/10.1111/vox.13254&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2676561940%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2676561940&rft_id=info:pmid/35089600&rfr_iscdi=true |