Comparative Profiling of Wood Canker Pathogens from Spore Traps and Symptomatic Plant Samples within California Almond and Walnut Orchards

Fungi causing wood canker diseases are major factors limiting productivity and longevity of almond and walnut orchards. The goal of this study was to compare pathogen profiles from spore traps with those of plant samples collected from symptomatic almond and walnut trees and assess if profiles could...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Plant disease 2022-08, Vol.106 (8), p.2182-2190
Hauptverfasser: Jimenez Luna, Israel, Doll, David, Ashworth, Vanessa E T M, Trouillas, Florent, Rolshausen, Philippe Eric
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 2190
container_issue 8
container_start_page 2182
container_title Plant disease
container_volume 106
creator Jimenez Luna, Israel
Doll, David
Ashworth, Vanessa E T M
Trouillas, Florent
Rolshausen, Philippe Eric
description Fungi causing wood canker diseases are major factors limiting productivity and longevity of almond and walnut orchards. The goal of this study was to compare pathogen profiles from spore traps with those of plant samples collected from symptomatic almond and walnut trees and assess if profiles could be influenced by orchard type and age, rainfall amount and frequency, and/or neighboring trees. Three almond orchards and one walnut orchard with different characteristics were selected for this study. Fungal inoculum was captured weekly from nine trees per orchard using a passive spore trapping device, during a 30-week period in the rainy season (October-April) and for two consecutive years. Fungal taxa identified from spore traps were compared with a collection of fungal isolates obtained from 61 symptomatic wood samples collected from the orchards. Using a culture-dependent approach coupled with molecular identification, we identified eighteen known pathogenic species from ten fungal genera ( , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , and ), plus two unidentified and species. However, only four species were identified with both methods ( , , and ), albeit not consistently across orchards. Our results demonstrate a clear disparity between the two diagnostic methods and caution against using passive spore traps to predict disease risks. In particular, the spore trap approach failed to capture; (i) insect-vectored pathogens such as that were often recovered from almond trunk and scaffold; (ii) commonly isolated from wood samples likely because species have a spatially restricted dispersal mechanism, since spores are exuded in a cirrus; and (iii) pathogenic species with low incidence in wood samples such as and . We propose that orchard inoculum is composed of both endemic taxa that are characterized by frequent and repeated trapping events from the same trees and isolated from plant samples, as well as immigrant taxa characterized by rare trapping events. We hypothesize that host type, orchard age, precipitation, and alternative hosts at the periphery of orchards are factors that could affect pathogen profile. We discuss the limitations and benefits of our methodology and experimental design to develop guidelines and prediction tools for fungal wood canker diseases in California orchards.
doi_str_mv 10.1094/PDIS-05-21-1057-RE
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2622961450</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2622961450</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c303t-7cacf73e7fed5ff97b1aecf12843a5c7799bf80db5878433b3d12f8f096d1a2a3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNo9kctO5DAQRS0Egh7gB1ggL9mY8SOJ4yVqegYkJFo0iKVVcWzaEMfBTs-IX-CrSYvHqqTSPUelugidMHrOqCp-Ly-vV4SWhDPCaCnJ3WIHzZgqBJGV4rtoRplihCsmD9CvnJ8ppUVR1fvoQJRUSs75DL3PYxggwej_WbxM0fnO9084OvwYY4vn0L_YhJcwruOT7TN2KQa8GmKy-D7BkDH0LV69hWGMYZIYvOygH_EKwtDZjP_7ce37SdN5F1PvAV90IU7IFnuErt-M-DaZNaQ2H6E9B122x1_zED38WdzPr8jN7d_r-cUNMYKKkUgDxklhpbNt6ZySDQNrHON1IaA0UirVuJq2TVnLaSUa0TLuakdV1TLgIA7R2ad3SPF1Y_Oog8_GdtPhNm6y5hXnqmJFSaco_4yaFHNO1ukh-QDpTTOqtx3obQealpozve1A3y0m6PTLv2mCbX-Q76eLD-N-hXI</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2622961450</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Comparative Profiling of Wood Canker Pathogens from Spore Traps and Symptomatic Plant Samples within California Almond and Walnut Orchards</title><source>EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals</source><source>Alma/SFX Local Collection</source><source>American Phytopathological Society Journal Back Issues</source><creator>Jimenez Luna, Israel ; Doll, David ; Ashworth, Vanessa E T M ; Trouillas, Florent ; Rolshausen, Philippe Eric</creator><creatorcontrib>Jimenez Luna, Israel ; Doll, David ; Ashworth, Vanessa E T M ; Trouillas, Florent ; Rolshausen, Philippe Eric</creatorcontrib><description>Fungi causing wood canker diseases are major factors limiting productivity and longevity of almond and walnut orchards. The goal of this study was to compare pathogen profiles from spore traps with those of plant samples collected from symptomatic almond and walnut trees and assess if profiles could be influenced by orchard type and age, rainfall amount and frequency, and/or neighboring trees. Three almond orchards and one walnut orchard with different characteristics were selected for this study. Fungal inoculum was captured weekly from nine trees per orchard using a passive spore trapping device, during a 30-week period in the rainy season (October-April) and for two consecutive years. Fungal taxa identified from spore traps were compared with a collection of fungal isolates obtained from 61 symptomatic wood samples collected from the orchards. Using a culture-dependent approach coupled with molecular identification, we identified eighteen known pathogenic species from ten fungal genera ( , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , and ), plus two unidentified and species. However, only four species were identified with both methods ( , , and ), albeit not consistently across orchards. Our results demonstrate a clear disparity between the two diagnostic methods and caution against using passive spore traps to predict disease risks. In particular, the spore trap approach failed to capture; (i) insect-vectored pathogens such as that were often recovered from almond trunk and scaffold; (ii) commonly isolated from wood samples likely because species have a spatially restricted dispersal mechanism, since spores are exuded in a cirrus; and (iii) pathogenic species with low incidence in wood samples such as and . We propose that orchard inoculum is composed of both endemic taxa that are characterized by frequent and repeated trapping events from the same trees and isolated from plant samples, as well as immigrant taxa characterized by rare trapping events. We hypothesize that host type, orchard age, precipitation, and alternative hosts at the periphery of orchards are factors that could affect pathogen profile. We discuss the limitations and benefits of our methodology and experimental design to develop guidelines and prediction tools for fungal wood canker diseases in California orchards.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0191-2917</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1943-7692</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1094/PDIS-05-21-1057-RE</identifier><identifier>PMID: 35077222</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>United States</publisher><ispartof>Plant disease, 2022-08, Vol.106 (8), p.2182-2190</ispartof><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c303t-7cacf73e7fed5ff97b1aecf12843a5c7799bf80db5878433b3d12f8f096d1a2a3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c303t-7cacf73e7fed5ff97b1aecf12843a5c7799bf80db5878433b3d12f8f096d1a2a3</cites><orcidid>0000-0002-6202-680X ; 0000-0003-0148-5022</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,3724,27924,27925</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35077222$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Jimenez Luna, Israel</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Doll, David</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ashworth, Vanessa E T M</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Trouillas, Florent</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Rolshausen, Philippe Eric</creatorcontrib><title>Comparative Profiling of Wood Canker Pathogens from Spore Traps and Symptomatic Plant Samples within California Almond and Walnut Orchards</title><title>Plant disease</title><addtitle>Plant Dis</addtitle><description>Fungi causing wood canker diseases are major factors limiting productivity and longevity of almond and walnut orchards. The goal of this study was to compare pathogen profiles from spore traps with those of plant samples collected from symptomatic almond and walnut trees and assess if profiles could be influenced by orchard type and age, rainfall amount and frequency, and/or neighboring trees. Three almond orchards and one walnut orchard with different characteristics were selected for this study. Fungal inoculum was captured weekly from nine trees per orchard using a passive spore trapping device, during a 30-week period in the rainy season (October-April) and for two consecutive years. Fungal taxa identified from spore traps were compared with a collection of fungal isolates obtained from 61 symptomatic wood samples collected from the orchards. Using a culture-dependent approach coupled with molecular identification, we identified eighteen known pathogenic species from ten fungal genera ( , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , and ), plus two unidentified and species. However, only four species were identified with both methods ( , , and ), albeit not consistently across orchards. Our results demonstrate a clear disparity between the two diagnostic methods and caution against using passive spore traps to predict disease risks. In particular, the spore trap approach failed to capture; (i) insect-vectored pathogens such as that were often recovered from almond trunk and scaffold; (ii) commonly isolated from wood samples likely because species have a spatially restricted dispersal mechanism, since spores are exuded in a cirrus; and (iii) pathogenic species with low incidence in wood samples such as and . We propose that orchard inoculum is composed of both endemic taxa that are characterized by frequent and repeated trapping events from the same trees and isolated from plant samples, as well as immigrant taxa characterized by rare trapping events. We hypothesize that host type, orchard age, precipitation, and alternative hosts at the periphery of orchards are factors that could affect pathogen profile. We discuss the limitations and benefits of our methodology and experimental design to develop guidelines and prediction tools for fungal wood canker diseases in California orchards.</description><issn>0191-2917</issn><issn>1943-7692</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2022</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNo9kctO5DAQRS0Egh7gB1ggL9mY8SOJ4yVqegYkJFo0iKVVcWzaEMfBTs-IX-CrSYvHqqTSPUelugidMHrOqCp-Ly-vV4SWhDPCaCnJ3WIHzZgqBJGV4rtoRplihCsmD9CvnJ8ppUVR1fvoQJRUSs75DL3PYxggwej_WbxM0fnO9084OvwYY4vn0L_YhJcwruOT7TN2KQa8GmKy-D7BkDH0LV69hWGMYZIYvOygH_EKwtDZjP_7ce37SdN5F1PvAV90IU7IFnuErt-M-DaZNaQ2H6E9B122x1_zED38WdzPr8jN7d_r-cUNMYKKkUgDxklhpbNt6ZySDQNrHON1IaA0UirVuJq2TVnLaSUa0TLuakdV1TLgIA7R2ad3SPF1Y_Oog8_GdtPhNm6y5hXnqmJFSaco_4yaFHNO1ukh-QDpTTOqtx3obQealpozve1A3y0m6PTLv2mCbX-Q76eLD-N-hXI</recordid><startdate>20220801</startdate><enddate>20220801</enddate><creator>Jimenez Luna, Israel</creator><creator>Doll, David</creator><creator>Ashworth, Vanessa E T M</creator><creator>Trouillas, Florent</creator><creator>Rolshausen, Philippe Eric</creator><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6202-680X</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0148-5022</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20220801</creationdate><title>Comparative Profiling of Wood Canker Pathogens from Spore Traps and Symptomatic Plant Samples within California Almond and Walnut Orchards</title><author>Jimenez Luna, Israel ; Doll, David ; Ashworth, Vanessa E T M ; Trouillas, Florent ; Rolshausen, Philippe Eric</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c303t-7cacf73e7fed5ff97b1aecf12843a5c7799bf80db5878433b3d12f8f096d1a2a3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2022</creationdate><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Jimenez Luna, Israel</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Doll, David</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ashworth, Vanessa E T M</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Trouillas, Florent</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Rolshausen, Philippe Eric</creatorcontrib><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Plant disease</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Jimenez Luna, Israel</au><au>Doll, David</au><au>Ashworth, Vanessa E T M</au><au>Trouillas, Florent</au><au>Rolshausen, Philippe Eric</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Comparative Profiling of Wood Canker Pathogens from Spore Traps and Symptomatic Plant Samples within California Almond and Walnut Orchards</atitle><jtitle>Plant disease</jtitle><addtitle>Plant Dis</addtitle><date>2022-08-01</date><risdate>2022</risdate><volume>106</volume><issue>8</issue><spage>2182</spage><epage>2190</epage><pages>2182-2190</pages><issn>0191-2917</issn><eissn>1943-7692</eissn><abstract>Fungi causing wood canker diseases are major factors limiting productivity and longevity of almond and walnut orchards. The goal of this study was to compare pathogen profiles from spore traps with those of plant samples collected from symptomatic almond and walnut trees and assess if profiles could be influenced by orchard type and age, rainfall amount and frequency, and/or neighboring trees. Three almond orchards and one walnut orchard with different characteristics were selected for this study. Fungal inoculum was captured weekly from nine trees per orchard using a passive spore trapping device, during a 30-week period in the rainy season (October-April) and for two consecutive years. Fungal taxa identified from spore traps were compared with a collection of fungal isolates obtained from 61 symptomatic wood samples collected from the orchards. Using a culture-dependent approach coupled with molecular identification, we identified eighteen known pathogenic species from ten fungal genera ( , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , and ), plus two unidentified and species. However, only four species were identified with both methods ( , , and ), albeit not consistently across orchards. Our results demonstrate a clear disparity between the two diagnostic methods and caution against using passive spore traps to predict disease risks. In particular, the spore trap approach failed to capture; (i) insect-vectored pathogens such as that were often recovered from almond trunk and scaffold; (ii) commonly isolated from wood samples likely because species have a spatially restricted dispersal mechanism, since spores are exuded in a cirrus; and (iii) pathogenic species with low incidence in wood samples such as and . We propose that orchard inoculum is composed of both endemic taxa that are characterized by frequent and repeated trapping events from the same trees and isolated from plant samples, as well as immigrant taxa characterized by rare trapping events. We hypothesize that host type, orchard age, precipitation, and alternative hosts at the periphery of orchards are factors that could affect pathogen profile. We discuss the limitations and benefits of our methodology and experimental design to develop guidelines and prediction tools for fungal wood canker diseases in California orchards.</abstract><cop>United States</cop><pmid>35077222</pmid><doi>10.1094/PDIS-05-21-1057-RE</doi><tpages>9</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6202-680X</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0148-5022</orcidid></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0191-2917
ispartof Plant disease, 2022-08, Vol.106 (8), p.2182-2190
issn 0191-2917
1943-7692
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2622961450
source EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals; Alma/SFX Local Collection; American Phytopathological Society Journal Back Issues
title Comparative Profiling of Wood Canker Pathogens from Spore Traps and Symptomatic Plant Samples within California Almond and Walnut Orchards
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-27T14%3A02%3A57IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Comparative%20Profiling%20of%20Wood%20Canker%20Pathogens%20from%20Spore%20Traps%20and%20Symptomatic%20Plant%20Samples%20within%20California%20Almond%20and%20Walnut%20Orchards&rft.jtitle=Plant%20disease&rft.au=Jimenez%20Luna,%20Israel&rft.date=2022-08-01&rft.volume=106&rft.issue=8&rft.spage=2182&rft.epage=2190&rft.pages=2182-2190&rft.issn=0191-2917&rft.eissn=1943-7692&rft_id=info:doi/10.1094/PDIS-05-21-1057-RE&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2622961450%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2622961450&rft_id=info:pmid/35077222&rfr_iscdi=true