Prehospital Use of the Esophageal Tracheal Combitube Supraglottic Airway Device: A Retrospective Cohort Study

In the province of Quebec (Canada), paramedics use the esophageal tracheal Combitube (ETC) for prehospital airway management. Our main objective was to determine the proportion of patients with successful ventilation achieved after ETC use. Our secondary aim was to determine the number of ETC insert...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:The Journal of emergency medicine 2022-03, Vol.62 (3), p.324-331
Hauptverfasser: Dufour-Neyron, Hubert, Tanguay, Katherine, Nadeau, Alexandra, Emond, Marcel, Harrisson, Jessica, Robert, Sébastien, Capolla-Daneau, Nicolas, Groulx, Mathieu, Carmichael, Pierre-Hugues, Mercier, Eric
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 331
container_issue 3
container_start_page 324
container_title The Journal of emergency medicine
container_volume 62
creator Dufour-Neyron, Hubert
Tanguay, Katherine
Nadeau, Alexandra
Emond, Marcel
Harrisson, Jessica
Robert, Sébastien
Capolla-Daneau, Nicolas
Groulx, Mathieu
Carmichael, Pierre-Hugues
Mercier, Eric
description In the province of Quebec (Canada), paramedics use the esophageal tracheal Combitube (ETC) for prehospital airway management. Our main objective was to determine the proportion of patients with successful ventilation achieved after ETC use. Our secondary aim was to determine the number of ETC insertion attempts required to ventilate the patient. This is a retrospective cohort study. All patients who had ≥1 attempt to insert an ETC during prehospital care between January 1, 2017 and December 31, 2018 were included. Prehospital and in-hospital data were extracted. Successful ventilation was defined as thorax elevation, lung sounds on chest auscultation, or positive end-tidal capnography after ETC insertion. A total of 580 emergency medical services interventions (99.3% cardiac arrests) were included. Most patients were men (62.5%) with a mean age 67.0 years (SD 17.6 years), and 35 (13.1%) of the 298 patients transported to emergency department survived to hospital discharge. Sufficient information to determine whether ventilation was successful or not was available for 515 interventions. Ventilation was achieved during 427 (82.7%) of these interventions. The number of ETC insertion attempts was available for 349 of the 427 successful ETC use. Overall, the first insertion resulted in successful ventilation during 294 interventions for an overall proportion of first-pass success ranging between 57.1% and 72.1%. Proportions of successful ventilation and ETC first-pass success are lower than those reported in the literature with supraglottic airway devices. The reasons explaining these lower rates and their impact on patient-centered outcomes need to be studied.
doi_str_mv 10.1016/j.jemermed.2021.11.005
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2622481938</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S0736467921009100</els_id><sourcerecordid>2622481938</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c368t-dd5a1164fbed4580567aa049966714aa16ce8774474aaa460ef9e630acef56ff3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFkF9PwyAUxYnR6Jx-BcOjL63QUmh9cpl_ExON02fC6K1laaUCndm3l2Xu2Sfgcs659_4QuqAkpYTyq1W6gh5cD3WakYymlKaEFAdokuVFlhQkqw7RhIicJ4yL6gSder8ihApS0mN0kheEi7xiE9S_OmitH0xQHf7wgG2DQwv4ztuhVZ8Qq-9O6XZ7mdt-acK4BLwYB6c-OxuC0Xhm3I_a4FtYGw3XeIbfILgYCTqYNURXa13AizDWmzN01KjOw_nfOUUf93fv88fk-eXhaT57TnTOy5DUdaEo5axZQs2KkhRcKEVYVXEuKFOKcg2lEIyJ-FCME2gq4DlRGpqCN00-RZe73MHZ7xF8kL3xGrpOfYEdvcx4lrGSVnkZpXwn1XFm76CRgzO9chtJidyiliu5Ry23qCWlMqKOxou_HuNy-7e37dlGwc1OAHHTtQEnvTbwpaE2LrKRtTX_9fgFSx-UQw</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2622481938</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Prehospital Use of the Esophageal Tracheal Combitube Supraglottic Airway Device: A Retrospective Cohort Study</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>ScienceDirect Journals (5 years ago - present)</source><creator>Dufour-Neyron, Hubert ; Tanguay, Katherine ; Nadeau, Alexandra ; Emond, Marcel ; Harrisson, Jessica ; Robert, Sébastien ; Capolla-Daneau, Nicolas ; Groulx, Mathieu ; Carmichael, Pierre-Hugues ; Mercier, Eric</creator><creatorcontrib>Dufour-Neyron, Hubert ; Tanguay, Katherine ; Nadeau, Alexandra ; Emond, Marcel ; Harrisson, Jessica ; Robert, Sébastien ; Capolla-Daneau, Nicolas ; Groulx, Mathieu ; Carmichael, Pierre-Hugues ; Mercier, Eric</creatorcontrib><description>In the province of Quebec (Canada), paramedics use the esophageal tracheal Combitube (ETC) for prehospital airway management. Our main objective was to determine the proportion of patients with successful ventilation achieved after ETC use. Our secondary aim was to determine the number of ETC insertion attempts required to ventilate the patient. This is a retrospective cohort study. All patients who had ≥1 attempt to insert an ETC during prehospital care between January 1, 2017 and December 31, 2018 were included. Prehospital and in-hospital data were extracted. Successful ventilation was defined as thorax elevation, lung sounds on chest auscultation, or positive end-tidal capnography after ETC insertion. A total of 580 emergency medical services interventions (99.3% cardiac arrests) were included. Most patients were men (62.5%) with a mean age 67.0 years (SD 17.6 years), and 35 (13.1%) of the 298 patients transported to emergency department survived to hospital discharge. Sufficient information to determine whether ventilation was successful or not was available for 515 interventions. Ventilation was achieved during 427 (82.7%) of these interventions. The number of ETC insertion attempts was available for 349 of the 427 successful ETC use. Overall, the first insertion resulted in successful ventilation during 294 interventions for an overall proportion of first-pass success ranging between 57.1% and 72.1%. Proportions of successful ventilation and ETC first-pass success are lower than those reported in the literature with supraglottic airway devices. The reasons explaining these lower rates and their impact on patient-centered outcomes need to be studied.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0736-4679</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 2352-5029</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.jemermed.2021.11.005</identifier><identifier>PMID: 35067394</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>United States: Elsevier Inc</publisher><subject>Aged ; Airway Management ; cardiac arrest ; Combitube ; Emergency Medical Services - methods ; Female ; Heart Arrest ; Humans ; Intubation, Intratracheal - methods ; Male ; prehospital ; Retrospective Studies ; supraglottic airway device</subject><ispartof>The Journal of emergency medicine, 2022-03, Vol.62 (3), p.324-331</ispartof><rights>2021</rights><rights>Copyright © 2021. Published by Elsevier Inc.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c368t-dd5a1164fbed4580567aa049966714aa16ce8774474aaa460ef9e630acef56ff3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c368t-dd5a1164fbed4580567aa049966714aa16ce8774474aaa460ef9e630acef56ff3</cites><orcidid>0000-0002-4253-4129 ; 0000-0001-7050-1079 ; 0000-0003-4365-2220 ; 0000-0002-5324-862X</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jemermed.2021.11.005$$EHTML$$P50$$Gelsevier$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,3550,27924,27925,45995</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35067394$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Dufour-Neyron, Hubert</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Tanguay, Katherine</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Nadeau, Alexandra</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Emond, Marcel</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Harrisson, Jessica</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Robert, Sébastien</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Capolla-Daneau, Nicolas</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Groulx, Mathieu</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Carmichael, Pierre-Hugues</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mercier, Eric</creatorcontrib><title>Prehospital Use of the Esophageal Tracheal Combitube Supraglottic Airway Device: A Retrospective Cohort Study</title><title>The Journal of emergency medicine</title><addtitle>J Emerg Med</addtitle><description>In the province of Quebec (Canada), paramedics use the esophageal tracheal Combitube (ETC) for prehospital airway management. Our main objective was to determine the proportion of patients with successful ventilation achieved after ETC use. Our secondary aim was to determine the number of ETC insertion attempts required to ventilate the patient. This is a retrospective cohort study. All patients who had ≥1 attempt to insert an ETC during prehospital care between January 1, 2017 and December 31, 2018 were included. Prehospital and in-hospital data were extracted. Successful ventilation was defined as thorax elevation, lung sounds on chest auscultation, or positive end-tidal capnography after ETC insertion. A total of 580 emergency medical services interventions (99.3% cardiac arrests) were included. Most patients were men (62.5%) with a mean age 67.0 years (SD 17.6 years), and 35 (13.1%) of the 298 patients transported to emergency department survived to hospital discharge. Sufficient information to determine whether ventilation was successful or not was available for 515 interventions. Ventilation was achieved during 427 (82.7%) of these interventions. The number of ETC insertion attempts was available for 349 of the 427 successful ETC use. Overall, the first insertion resulted in successful ventilation during 294 interventions for an overall proportion of first-pass success ranging between 57.1% and 72.1%. Proportions of successful ventilation and ETC first-pass success are lower than those reported in the literature with supraglottic airway devices. The reasons explaining these lower rates and their impact on patient-centered outcomes need to be studied.</description><subject>Aged</subject><subject>Airway Management</subject><subject>cardiac arrest</subject><subject>Combitube</subject><subject>Emergency Medical Services - methods</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Heart Arrest</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Intubation, Intratracheal - methods</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>prehospital</subject><subject>Retrospective Studies</subject><subject>supraglottic airway device</subject><issn>0736-4679</issn><issn>2352-5029</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2022</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNqFkF9PwyAUxYnR6Jx-BcOjL63QUmh9cpl_ExON02fC6K1laaUCndm3l2Xu2Sfgcs659_4QuqAkpYTyq1W6gh5cD3WakYymlKaEFAdokuVFlhQkqw7RhIicJ4yL6gSder8ihApS0mN0kheEi7xiE9S_OmitH0xQHf7wgG2DQwv4ztuhVZ8Qq-9O6XZ7mdt-acK4BLwYB6c-OxuC0Xhm3I_a4FtYGw3XeIbfILgYCTqYNURXa13AizDWmzN01KjOw_nfOUUf93fv88fk-eXhaT57TnTOy5DUdaEo5axZQs2KkhRcKEVYVXEuKFOKcg2lEIyJ-FCME2gq4DlRGpqCN00-RZe73MHZ7xF8kL3xGrpOfYEdvcx4lrGSVnkZpXwn1XFm76CRgzO9chtJidyiliu5Ry23qCWlMqKOxou_HuNy-7e37dlGwc1OAHHTtQEnvTbwpaE2LrKRtTX_9fgFSx-UQw</recordid><startdate>202203</startdate><enddate>202203</enddate><creator>Dufour-Neyron, Hubert</creator><creator>Tanguay, Katherine</creator><creator>Nadeau, Alexandra</creator><creator>Emond, Marcel</creator><creator>Harrisson, Jessica</creator><creator>Robert, Sébastien</creator><creator>Capolla-Daneau, Nicolas</creator><creator>Groulx, Mathieu</creator><creator>Carmichael, Pierre-Hugues</creator><creator>Mercier, Eric</creator><general>Elsevier Inc</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4253-4129</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7050-1079</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4365-2220</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5324-862X</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>202203</creationdate><title>Prehospital Use of the Esophageal Tracheal Combitube Supraglottic Airway Device: A Retrospective Cohort Study</title><author>Dufour-Neyron, Hubert ; Tanguay, Katherine ; Nadeau, Alexandra ; Emond, Marcel ; Harrisson, Jessica ; Robert, Sébastien ; Capolla-Daneau, Nicolas ; Groulx, Mathieu ; Carmichael, Pierre-Hugues ; Mercier, Eric</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c368t-dd5a1164fbed4580567aa049966714aa16ce8774474aaa460ef9e630acef56ff3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2022</creationdate><topic>Aged</topic><topic>Airway Management</topic><topic>cardiac arrest</topic><topic>Combitube</topic><topic>Emergency Medical Services - methods</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Heart Arrest</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Intubation, Intratracheal - methods</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>prehospital</topic><topic>Retrospective Studies</topic><topic>supraglottic airway device</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Dufour-Neyron, Hubert</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Tanguay, Katherine</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Nadeau, Alexandra</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Emond, Marcel</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Harrisson, Jessica</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Robert, Sébastien</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Capolla-Daneau, Nicolas</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Groulx, Mathieu</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Carmichael, Pierre-Hugues</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mercier, Eric</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>The Journal of emergency medicine</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Dufour-Neyron, Hubert</au><au>Tanguay, Katherine</au><au>Nadeau, Alexandra</au><au>Emond, Marcel</au><au>Harrisson, Jessica</au><au>Robert, Sébastien</au><au>Capolla-Daneau, Nicolas</au><au>Groulx, Mathieu</au><au>Carmichael, Pierre-Hugues</au><au>Mercier, Eric</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Prehospital Use of the Esophageal Tracheal Combitube Supraglottic Airway Device: A Retrospective Cohort Study</atitle><jtitle>The Journal of emergency medicine</jtitle><addtitle>J Emerg Med</addtitle><date>2022-03</date><risdate>2022</risdate><volume>62</volume><issue>3</issue><spage>324</spage><epage>331</epage><pages>324-331</pages><issn>0736-4679</issn><eissn>2352-5029</eissn><abstract>In the province of Quebec (Canada), paramedics use the esophageal tracheal Combitube (ETC) for prehospital airway management. Our main objective was to determine the proportion of patients with successful ventilation achieved after ETC use. Our secondary aim was to determine the number of ETC insertion attempts required to ventilate the patient. This is a retrospective cohort study. All patients who had ≥1 attempt to insert an ETC during prehospital care between January 1, 2017 and December 31, 2018 were included. Prehospital and in-hospital data were extracted. Successful ventilation was defined as thorax elevation, lung sounds on chest auscultation, or positive end-tidal capnography after ETC insertion. A total of 580 emergency medical services interventions (99.3% cardiac arrests) were included. Most patients were men (62.5%) with a mean age 67.0 years (SD 17.6 years), and 35 (13.1%) of the 298 patients transported to emergency department survived to hospital discharge. Sufficient information to determine whether ventilation was successful or not was available for 515 interventions. Ventilation was achieved during 427 (82.7%) of these interventions. The number of ETC insertion attempts was available for 349 of the 427 successful ETC use. Overall, the first insertion resulted in successful ventilation during 294 interventions for an overall proportion of first-pass success ranging between 57.1% and 72.1%. Proportions of successful ventilation and ETC first-pass success are lower than those reported in the literature with supraglottic airway devices. The reasons explaining these lower rates and their impact on patient-centered outcomes need to be studied.</abstract><cop>United States</cop><pub>Elsevier Inc</pub><pmid>35067394</pmid><doi>10.1016/j.jemermed.2021.11.005</doi><tpages>8</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4253-4129</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7050-1079</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4365-2220</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5324-862X</orcidid></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0736-4679
ispartof The Journal of emergency medicine, 2022-03, Vol.62 (3), p.324-331
issn 0736-4679
2352-5029
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2622481938
source MEDLINE; ScienceDirect Journals (5 years ago - present)
subjects Aged
Airway Management
cardiac arrest
Combitube
Emergency Medical Services - methods
Female
Heart Arrest
Humans
Intubation, Intratracheal - methods
Male
prehospital
Retrospective Studies
supraglottic airway device
title Prehospital Use of the Esophageal Tracheal Combitube Supraglottic Airway Device: A Retrospective Cohort Study
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-05T19%3A16%3A10IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Prehospital%20Use%20of%20the%20Esophageal%20Tracheal%20Combitube%20Supraglottic%20Airway%20Device:%20A%20Retrospective%20Cohort%20Study&rft.jtitle=The%20Journal%20of%20emergency%20medicine&rft.au=Dufour-Neyron,%20Hubert&rft.date=2022-03&rft.volume=62&rft.issue=3&rft.spage=324&rft.epage=331&rft.pages=324-331&rft.issn=0736-4679&rft.eissn=2352-5029&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.jemermed.2021.11.005&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2622481938%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2622481938&rft_id=info:pmid/35067394&rft_els_id=S0736467921009100&rfr_iscdi=true