Comparison of clinical practice guidelines on radiation dermatitis: a narrative review

Purpose Radiation dermatitis (RD) is a common side effect of radiation therapy (RT). While many different treatment strategies are currently used to address RD, there is a lack of consensus and RD prophylaxis and management guidelines have remained largely unchanged over the last 10 years. This revi...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Supportive care in cancer 2022-06, Vol.30 (6), p.4663-4674
Hauptverfasser: Finkelstein, Samuel, Kanee, Lauren, Behroozian, Tara, Wolf, Julie Ryan, van den Hurk, Corina, Chow, Edward, Bonomo, Pierluigi
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 4674
container_issue 6
container_start_page 4663
container_title Supportive care in cancer
container_volume 30
creator Finkelstein, Samuel
Kanee, Lauren
Behroozian, Tara
Wolf, Julie Ryan
van den Hurk, Corina
Chow, Edward
Bonomo, Pierluigi
description Purpose Radiation dermatitis (RD) is a common side effect of radiation therapy (RT). While many different treatment strategies are currently used to address RD, there is a lack of consensus and RD prophylaxis and management guidelines have remained largely unchanged over the last 10 years. This review aims to formulate unambiguous supportive care interventions by comparing RD clinical practice guidelines published between 2010 and 2021 by several organizations: Multinational Association for Supportive Care in Cancer (MASCC), British Columbia Cancer Agency (BCCA), Cancer Care Manitoba (CCMB), Oncology Nursing Society (ONS), Society and College of Radiographers (SCoR), and International Society of Nurses in Cancer Care (ISNCC). Methods Areas of agreement and discordance were assessed among the MASCC, BCCA, CCMB, ONS, SCoR, and ISNCC guidelines. Results Treatment recommendations across guidelines for acute RD and chronic RT-induced skin toxicities have been summarized. The strongest agreement among the guidelines exists for the use of topical corticosteroids, silver sulfadiazine, washing, and deodorant. All guidelines recommend the use of topical corticosteroids, and washing with water and soap is consistently supported. There is minimal consensus on an optimal dressing or barrier film for RD prophylaxis or management. MASCC weakly recommends prophylactic use of silver sulfadiazine to reduce RD, while BCCA, CCMB, and SCoR recommend its use upon signs of infection. MASCC and CCMB recommend the use of a long-pulsed dye laser to manage telangiectasia, a late effect of RT. Conclusions Given the extent of discordance among guideline recommendations, further research is recommended to establish optimal treatments for RD prophylaxis and management.
doi_str_mv 10.1007/s00520-022-06829-6
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>gale_proqu</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2622481486</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><galeid>A701892194</galeid><sourcerecordid>A701892194</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c442t-9b0a1634aebc80814b96929874f1bd033fbe236eb8c8180d13e3f643e975d3533</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kUtv1DAUhS1ERYfCH2CBIrFhk_b6bbOrRrykSt0AW8txbkaukniwk1b8ezyd8hRCXvj6-jtH1z6EvKBwTgH0RQGQDFpgrAVlmG3VI7KhgvNWc24fkw1YQVvBpTwlT0u5AaBaS_aEnHIJSmvONuTLNk17n2NJc5OGJoxxjsGPzT77sMSAzW6NPdYulqYi2ffRL7FWPeapVkssbxrfzD7nerrFJuNtxLtn5GTwY8HnD_sZ-fzu7afth_bq-v3H7eVVG4RgS2s78FRx4bELBgwVnVWWWaPFQLseOB86ZFxhZ4KhBnrKkQ9KcLRa9lxyfkZeH333OX1dsSxuiiXgOPoZ01ocU4yJ6mtURV_9hd6kNc91ukpJaZmw8Bu18yO6OA9pqT9xMHWXGqixjFpRqfN_UHX1OMWQZhxi7f8hYEdByKmUjIPb5zj5_M1RcIcw3TFMV8N092G6wywvHyZeuwn7n5If6VWAH4FSr-Yd5l9P-o_td0otp5I</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2655924906</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Comparison of clinical practice guidelines on radiation dermatitis: a narrative review</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>SpringerLink Journals - AutoHoldings</source><creator>Finkelstein, Samuel ; Kanee, Lauren ; Behroozian, Tara ; Wolf, Julie Ryan ; van den Hurk, Corina ; Chow, Edward ; Bonomo, Pierluigi</creator><creatorcontrib>Finkelstein, Samuel ; Kanee, Lauren ; Behroozian, Tara ; Wolf, Julie Ryan ; van den Hurk, Corina ; Chow, Edward ; Bonomo, Pierluigi</creatorcontrib><description>Purpose Radiation dermatitis (RD) is a common side effect of radiation therapy (RT). While many different treatment strategies are currently used to address RD, there is a lack of consensus and RD prophylaxis and management guidelines have remained largely unchanged over the last 10 years. This review aims to formulate unambiguous supportive care interventions by comparing RD clinical practice guidelines published between 2010 and 2021 by several organizations: Multinational Association for Supportive Care in Cancer (MASCC), British Columbia Cancer Agency (BCCA), Cancer Care Manitoba (CCMB), Oncology Nursing Society (ONS), Society and College of Radiographers (SCoR), and International Society of Nurses in Cancer Care (ISNCC). Methods Areas of agreement and discordance were assessed among the MASCC, BCCA, CCMB, ONS, SCoR, and ISNCC guidelines. Results Treatment recommendations across guidelines for acute RD and chronic RT-induced skin toxicities have been summarized. The strongest agreement among the guidelines exists for the use of topical corticosteroids, silver sulfadiazine, washing, and deodorant. All guidelines recommend the use of topical corticosteroids, and washing with water and soap is consistently supported. There is minimal consensus on an optimal dressing or barrier film for RD prophylaxis or management. MASCC weakly recommends prophylactic use of silver sulfadiazine to reduce RD, while BCCA, CCMB, and SCoR recommend its use upon signs of infection. MASCC and CCMB recommend the use of a long-pulsed dye laser to manage telangiectasia, a late effect of RT. Conclusions Given the extent of discordance among guideline recommendations, further research is recommended to establish optimal treatments for RD prophylaxis and management.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0941-4355</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1433-7339</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1007/s00520-022-06829-6</identifier><identifier>PMID: 35067732</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Berlin/Heidelberg: Springer Berlin Heidelberg</publisher><subject>Adrenal Cortex Hormones - therapeutic use ; Antibiotics ; Associations, institutions, etc ; Cancer therapies ; Clinical medicine ; Clinical practice guidelines ; Dermatitis ; Dermatologic Agents ; Disease prevention ; Humans ; Inflammation ; Lasers in medicine ; Medical colleges ; Medicine ; Medicine &amp; Public Health ; Neoplasms - therapy ; Nurses ; Nursing ; Nursing Research ; Oncology ; Pain Medicine ; Palliative care ; Practice Guidelines as Topic ; Radiation ; Radiodermatitis - etiology ; Radiodermatitis - prevention &amp; control ; Radiotherapy ; Rehabilitation Medicine ; Review Article ; Side effects ; Silver sulfadiazine ; Silver Sulfadiazine - therapeutic use ; Skin ; Societies ; Steroids ; Sulfadiazine</subject><ispartof>Supportive care in cancer, 2022-06, Vol.30 (6), p.4663-4674</ispartof><rights>The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature 2022</rights><rights>2022. The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature.</rights><rights>COPYRIGHT 2022 Springer</rights><rights>The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature 2022.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c442t-9b0a1634aebc80814b96929874f1bd033fbe236eb8c8180d13e3f643e975d3533</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c442t-9b0a1634aebc80814b96929874f1bd033fbe236eb8c8180d13e3f643e975d3533</cites><orcidid>0000-0001-9808-5257</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1007/s00520-022-06829-6$$EPDF$$P50$$Gspringer$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://link.springer.com/10.1007/s00520-022-06829-6$$EHTML$$P50$$Gspringer$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,27901,27902,41464,42533,51294</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35067732$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Finkelstein, Samuel</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kanee, Lauren</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Behroozian, Tara</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wolf, Julie Ryan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>van den Hurk, Corina</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Chow, Edward</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bonomo, Pierluigi</creatorcontrib><title>Comparison of clinical practice guidelines on radiation dermatitis: a narrative review</title><title>Supportive care in cancer</title><addtitle>Support Care Cancer</addtitle><addtitle>Support Care Cancer</addtitle><description>Purpose Radiation dermatitis (RD) is a common side effect of radiation therapy (RT). While many different treatment strategies are currently used to address RD, there is a lack of consensus and RD prophylaxis and management guidelines have remained largely unchanged over the last 10 years. This review aims to formulate unambiguous supportive care interventions by comparing RD clinical practice guidelines published between 2010 and 2021 by several organizations: Multinational Association for Supportive Care in Cancer (MASCC), British Columbia Cancer Agency (BCCA), Cancer Care Manitoba (CCMB), Oncology Nursing Society (ONS), Society and College of Radiographers (SCoR), and International Society of Nurses in Cancer Care (ISNCC). Methods Areas of agreement and discordance were assessed among the MASCC, BCCA, CCMB, ONS, SCoR, and ISNCC guidelines. Results Treatment recommendations across guidelines for acute RD and chronic RT-induced skin toxicities have been summarized. The strongest agreement among the guidelines exists for the use of topical corticosteroids, silver sulfadiazine, washing, and deodorant. All guidelines recommend the use of topical corticosteroids, and washing with water and soap is consistently supported. There is minimal consensus on an optimal dressing or barrier film for RD prophylaxis or management. MASCC weakly recommends prophylactic use of silver sulfadiazine to reduce RD, while BCCA, CCMB, and SCoR recommend its use upon signs of infection. MASCC and CCMB recommend the use of a long-pulsed dye laser to manage telangiectasia, a late effect of RT. Conclusions Given the extent of discordance among guideline recommendations, further research is recommended to establish optimal treatments for RD prophylaxis and management.</description><subject>Adrenal Cortex Hormones - therapeutic use</subject><subject>Antibiotics</subject><subject>Associations, institutions, etc</subject><subject>Cancer therapies</subject><subject>Clinical medicine</subject><subject>Clinical practice guidelines</subject><subject>Dermatitis</subject><subject>Dermatologic Agents</subject><subject>Disease prevention</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Inflammation</subject><subject>Lasers in medicine</subject><subject>Medical colleges</subject><subject>Medicine</subject><subject>Medicine &amp; Public Health</subject><subject>Neoplasms - therapy</subject><subject>Nurses</subject><subject>Nursing</subject><subject>Nursing Research</subject><subject>Oncology</subject><subject>Pain Medicine</subject><subject>Palliative care</subject><subject>Practice Guidelines as Topic</subject><subject>Radiation</subject><subject>Radiodermatitis - etiology</subject><subject>Radiodermatitis - prevention &amp; control</subject><subject>Radiotherapy</subject><subject>Rehabilitation Medicine</subject><subject>Review Article</subject><subject>Side effects</subject><subject>Silver sulfadiazine</subject><subject>Silver Sulfadiazine - therapeutic use</subject><subject>Skin</subject><subject>Societies</subject><subject>Steroids</subject><subject>Sulfadiazine</subject><issn>0941-4355</issn><issn>1433-7339</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2022</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><recordid>eNp9kUtv1DAUhS1ERYfCH2CBIrFhk_b6bbOrRrykSt0AW8txbkaukniwk1b8ezyd8hRCXvj6-jtH1z6EvKBwTgH0RQGQDFpgrAVlmG3VI7KhgvNWc24fkw1YQVvBpTwlT0u5AaBaS_aEnHIJSmvONuTLNk17n2NJc5OGJoxxjsGPzT77sMSAzW6NPdYulqYi2ffRL7FWPeapVkssbxrfzD7nerrFJuNtxLtn5GTwY8HnD_sZ-fzu7afth_bq-v3H7eVVG4RgS2s78FRx4bELBgwVnVWWWaPFQLseOB86ZFxhZ4KhBnrKkQ9KcLRa9lxyfkZeH333OX1dsSxuiiXgOPoZ01ocU4yJ6mtURV_9hd6kNc91ukpJaZmw8Bu18yO6OA9pqT9xMHWXGqixjFpRqfN_UHX1OMWQZhxi7f8hYEdByKmUjIPb5zj5_M1RcIcw3TFMV8N092G6wywvHyZeuwn7n5If6VWAH4FSr-Yd5l9P-o_td0otp5I</recordid><startdate>20220601</startdate><enddate>20220601</enddate><creator>Finkelstein, Samuel</creator><creator>Kanee, Lauren</creator><creator>Behroozian, Tara</creator><creator>Wolf, Julie Ryan</creator><creator>van den Hurk, Corina</creator><creator>Chow, Edward</creator><creator>Bonomo, Pierluigi</creator><general>Springer Berlin Heidelberg</general><general>Springer</general><general>Springer Nature B.V</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>0-V</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7RV</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88E</scope><scope>88J</scope><scope>8AO</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>ALSLI</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>HEHIP</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>KB0</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>M1P</scope><scope>M2R</scope><scope>M2S</scope><scope>NAPCQ</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>Q9U</scope><scope>7X8</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9808-5257</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20220601</creationdate><title>Comparison of clinical practice guidelines on radiation dermatitis: a narrative review</title><author>Finkelstein, Samuel ; Kanee, Lauren ; Behroozian, Tara ; Wolf, Julie Ryan ; van den Hurk, Corina ; Chow, Edward ; Bonomo, Pierluigi</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c442t-9b0a1634aebc80814b96929874f1bd033fbe236eb8c8180d13e3f643e975d3533</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2022</creationdate><topic>Adrenal Cortex Hormones - therapeutic use</topic><topic>Antibiotics</topic><topic>Associations, institutions, etc</topic><topic>Cancer therapies</topic><topic>Clinical medicine</topic><topic>Clinical practice guidelines</topic><topic>Dermatitis</topic><topic>Dermatologic Agents</topic><topic>Disease prevention</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Inflammation</topic><topic>Lasers in medicine</topic><topic>Medical colleges</topic><topic>Medicine</topic><topic>Medicine &amp; Public Health</topic><topic>Neoplasms - therapy</topic><topic>Nurses</topic><topic>Nursing</topic><topic>Nursing Research</topic><topic>Oncology</topic><topic>Pain Medicine</topic><topic>Palliative care</topic><topic>Practice Guidelines as Topic</topic><topic>Radiation</topic><topic>Radiodermatitis - etiology</topic><topic>Radiodermatitis - prevention &amp; control</topic><topic>Radiotherapy</topic><topic>Rehabilitation Medicine</topic><topic>Review Article</topic><topic>Side effects</topic><topic>Silver sulfadiazine</topic><topic>Silver Sulfadiazine - therapeutic use</topic><topic>Skin</topic><topic>Societies</topic><topic>Steroids</topic><topic>Sulfadiazine</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Finkelstein, Samuel</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kanee, Lauren</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Behroozian, Tara</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wolf, Julie Ryan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>van den Hurk, Corina</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Chow, Edward</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bonomo, Pierluigi</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Social Sciences Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Nursing &amp; Allied Health Database</collection><collection>Health &amp; Medical Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Medical Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Social Science Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Pharma Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>Social Science Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>Sociology Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Health &amp; Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Nursing &amp; Allied Health Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Health &amp; Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Medical Database</collection><collection>Social Science Database</collection><collection>Sociology Database</collection><collection>Nursing &amp; Allied Health Premium</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Supportive care in cancer</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Finkelstein, Samuel</au><au>Kanee, Lauren</au><au>Behroozian, Tara</au><au>Wolf, Julie Ryan</au><au>van den Hurk, Corina</au><au>Chow, Edward</au><au>Bonomo, Pierluigi</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Comparison of clinical practice guidelines on radiation dermatitis: a narrative review</atitle><jtitle>Supportive care in cancer</jtitle><stitle>Support Care Cancer</stitle><addtitle>Support Care Cancer</addtitle><date>2022-06-01</date><risdate>2022</risdate><volume>30</volume><issue>6</issue><spage>4663</spage><epage>4674</epage><pages>4663-4674</pages><issn>0941-4355</issn><eissn>1433-7339</eissn><abstract>Purpose Radiation dermatitis (RD) is a common side effect of radiation therapy (RT). While many different treatment strategies are currently used to address RD, there is a lack of consensus and RD prophylaxis and management guidelines have remained largely unchanged over the last 10 years. This review aims to formulate unambiguous supportive care interventions by comparing RD clinical practice guidelines published between 2010 and 2021 by several organizations: Multinational Association for Supportive Care in Cancer (MASCC), British Columbia Cancer Agency (BCCA), Cancer Care Manitoba (CCMB), Oncology Nursing Society (ONS), Society and College of Radiographers (SCoR), and International Society of Nurses in Cancer Care (ISNCC). Methods Areas of agreement and discordance were assessed among the MASCC, BCCA, CCMB, ONS, SCoR, and ISNCC guidelines. Results Treatment recommendations across guidelines for acute RD and chronic RT-induced skin toxicities have been summarized. The strongest agreement among the guidelines exists for the use of topical corticosteroids, silver sulfadiazine, washing, and deodorant. All guidelines recommend the use of topical corticosteroids, and washing with water and soap is consistently supported. There is minimal consensus on an optimal dressing or barrier film for RD prophylaxis or management. MASCC weakly recommends prophylactic use of silver sulfadiazine to reduce RD, while BCCA, CCMB, and SCoR recommend its use upon signs of infection. MASCC and CCMB recommend the use of a long-pulsed dye laser to manage telangiectasia, a late effect of RT. Conclusions Given the extent of discordance among guideline recommendations, further research is recommended to establish optimal treatments for RD prophylaxis and management.</abstract><cop>Berlin/Heidelberg</cop><pub>Springer Berlin Heidelberg</pub><pmid>35067732</pmid><doi>10.1007/s00520-022-06829-6</doi><tpages>12</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9808-5257</orcidid></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0941-4355
ispartof Supportive care in cancer, 2022-06, Vol.30 (6), p.4663-4674
issn 0941-4355
1433-7339
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2622481486
source MEDLINE; SpringerLink Journals - AutoHoldings
subjects Adrenal Cortex Hormones - therapeutic use
Antibiotics
Associations, institutions, etc
Cancer therapies
Clinical medicine
Clinical practice guidelines
Dermatitis
Dermatologic Agents
Disease prevention
Humans
Inflammation
Lasers in medicine
Medical colleges
Medicine
Medicine & Public Health
Neoplasms - therapy
Nurses
Nursing
Nursing Research
Oncology
Pain Medicine
Palliative care
Practice Guidelines as Topic
Radiation
Radiodermatitis - etiology
Radiodermatitis - prevention & control
Radiotherapy
Rehabilitation Medicine
Review Article
Side effects
Silver sulfadiazine
Silver Sulfadiazine - therapeutic use
Skin
Societies
Steroids
Sulfadiazine
title Comparison of clinical practice guidelines on radiation dermatitis: a narrative review
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-03T21%3A33%3A22IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-gale_proqu&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Comparison%20of%20clinical%20practice%20guidelines%20on%20radiation%20dermatitis:%20a%20narrative%20review&rft.jtitle=Supportive%20care%20in%20cancer&rft.au=Finkelstein,%20Samuel&rft.date=2022-06-01&rft.volume=30&rft.issue=6&rft.spage=4663&rft.epage=4674&rft.pages=4663-4674&rft.issn=0941-4355&rft.eissn=1433-7339&rft_id=info:doi/10.1007/s00520-022-06829-6&rft_dat=%3Cgale_proqu%3EA701892194%3C/gale_proqu%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2655924906&rft_id=info:pmid/35067732&rft_galeid=A701892194&rfr_iscdi=true