Kelp detritus: Unutilized productivity or an unacknowledged trophic resource?

Kelp beds are one of the most productive marine systems and, while little of this production is directly consumed, there is growing evidence that kelp detritus is an essential food source for many detrital and suspension feeders, and forms an important component of offshore sedimentary carbon pools....

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:The Science of the total environment 2022-05, Vol.820, p.153191-153191, Article 153191
Hauptverfasser: Walton, M.E.M., Browne, R., Griffiths, J.N., Cartwright, D., Robins, P., Malham, S.K., Le Vay, L.
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 153191
container_issue
container_start_page 153191
container_title The Science of the total environment
container_volume 820
creator Walton, M.E.M.
Browne, R.
Griffiths, J.N.
Cartwright, D.
Robins, P.
Malham, S.K.
Le Vay, L.
description Kelp beds are one of the most productive marine systems and, while little of this production is directly consumed, there is growing evidence that kelp detritus is an essential food source for many detrital and suspension feeders, and forms an important component of offshore sedimentary carbon pools. However, the extent of the contribution of kelp detritus to the nutrition of coastal fauna is not well resolved. In this study, we compare the contribution of phytoplankton, kelp detritus, and waste from fish cages to the diet of a sentinel suspension feeder, the blue mussel (Mytilus edulis) using stable isotopes. We found a significant depletion in both 13C and 15N in kelp tissue with age (distance from stipe to the deteriorating distal end of the kelp frond) which may have biased dietary estimates in previous studies which have applied isotopic source values derived from fresh kelp. Our mixing models indicate that macroalgal detritus formed 59% of the diet of the mussels in Berehaven, Bantry Bay, Ireland. We support the isotopic mixing model results by modelling the relative production of phytoplankton, kelp, and salmon farm waste, and found the supply of C and N from kelp and phytoplankton far exceeded the requirements of the mussels with much less coming from the nearby fish cages. Monthly chlorophyll measurements indicated there was only sufficient phytoplankton density to support mussel growth during the spring and autumn, explaining our observation of patterns in the relative importance of utilization of kelp detritus. Where there is pressure to harvest kelp beds, this study highlights the supporting ecosystem service they provide as an important dietary source in coastal food webs and emphasises the need for appropriate management measures for this resource. [Display omitted] •The importance of kelp detritus in coastal food webs may have been underestimated.•Kelp detritus formed 50–60% of the diet of suspension feeders.•Phytoplankton and kelp productivity were similar, but
doi_str_mv 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2022.153191
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2622278108</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S0048969722002819</els_id><sourcerecordid>2636727407</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c453t-e98a7cc38cc9183ac3127abaca5990feb86b4a64b8b73e447d7893d86847b1623</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqNkEtPGzEURq0KVELav0BnyWaCX-NHN1WEykMEsSlry2PfFKeTcWp7UoVfz0ShbOFu7uZ83706CH0jeEYwERerWXahxAL9dkYxpTPSMKLJJzQhSuqaYCqO0ARjrmottDxBpzmv8DhSkc_ohDW4IVzKCbq_g25TeSgplCF_rx77oYQuPIOvNin6wZWwDWVXxVTZvhp66_708V8H_vdIlBQ3T8FVCXIckoMfX9Dx0nYZvr7uKXq8-vnr8qZePFzfXs4XteMNKzVoZaVzTDmniWLWMUKlba2zjdZ4Ca0SLbeCt6qVDDiXXirNvBKKy5YIyqbo_NA7_vh3gFzMOmQHXWd7iEM2VDAhqeRYfgCllI5WsBpReUBdijknWJpNCmubdoZgs9duVuZNu9lrNwftY_Ls9cjQrsG_5f57HoH5AYDRyjZA2hdB78CHBK4YH8O7R14AMUiYqQ</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2622278108</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Kelp detritus: Unutilized productivity or an unacknowledged trophic resource?</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals</source><creator>Walton, M.E.M. ; Browne, R. ; Griffiths, J.N. ; Cartwright, D. ; Robins, P. ; Malham, S.K. ; Le Vay, L.</creator><creatorcontrib>Walton, M.E.M. ; Browne, R. ; Griffiths, J.N. ; Cartwright, D. ; Robins, P. ; Malham, S.K. ; Le Vay, L.</creatorcontrib><description>Kelp beds are one of the most productive marine systems and, while little of this production is directly consumed, there is growing evidence that kelp detritus is an essential food source for many detrital and suspension feeders, and forms an important component of offshore sedimentary carbon pools. However, the extent of the contribution of kelp detritus to the nutrition of coastal fauna is not well resolved. In this study, we compare the contribution of phytoplankton, kelp detritus, and waste from fish cages to the diet of a sentinel suspension feeder, the blue mussel (Mytilus edulis) using stable isotopes. We found a significant depletion in both 13C and 15N in kelp tissue with age (distance from stipe to the deteriorating distal end of the kelp frond) which may have biased dietary estimates in previous studies which have applied isotopic source values derived from fresh kelp. Our mixing models indicate that macroalgal detritus formed 59% of the diet of the mussels in Berehaven, Bantry Bay, Ireland. We support the isotopic mixing model results by modelling the relative production of phytoplankton, kelp, and salmon farm waste, and found the supply of C and N from kelp and phytoplankton far exceeded the requirements of the mussels with much less coming from the nearby fish cages. Monthly chlorophyll measurements indicated there was only sufficient phytoplankton density to support mussel growth during the spring and autumn, explaining our observation of patterns in the relative importance of utilization of kelp detritus. Where there is pressure to harvest kelp beds, this study highlights the supporting ecosystem service they provide as an important dietary source in coastal food webs and emphasises the need for appropriate management measures for this resource. [Display omitted] •The importance of kelp detritus in coastal food webs may have been underestimated.•Kelp detritus formed 50–60% of the diet of suspension feeders.•Phytoplankton and kelp productivity were similar, but &lt;1% sustained mussels.•Phytoplankton contribution to mussel tissue correlated with chlorophyll density.•Applying isotopic values of kelp distal tissue reduces bias in diet source models.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0048-9697</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1879-1026</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2022.153191</identifier><identifier>PMID: 35051477</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Netherlands: Elsevier B.V</publisher><subject>agricultural wastes ; Animals ; autumn ; Carbon ; chlorophyll ; Detritus ; Diet ; Ecosystem ; ecosystem services ; environment ; fauna ; fish ; fish farms ; Food Chain ; Ireland ; Kelp ; Laminaria digitata ; macroalgae ; Mussel ; mussels ; Mytilus edulis ; phytoplankton ; spring ; Suspension feeder ; suspension feeding ; Trophic contribution</subject><ispartof>The Science of the total environment, 2022-05, Vol.820, p.153191-153191, Article 153191</ispartof><rights>2022 The Authors</rights><rights>Copyright © 2022 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c453t-e98a7cc38cc9183ac3127abaca5990feb86b4a64b8b73e447d7893d86847b1623</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c453t-e98a7cc38cc9183ac3127abaca5990feb86b4a64b8b73e447d7893d86847b1623</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0048969722002819$$EHTML$$P50$$Gelsevier$$Hfree_for_read</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,3537,27903,27904,65309</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35051477$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Walton, M.E.M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Browne, R.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Griffiths, J.N.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Cartwright, D.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Robins, P.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Malham, S.K.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Le Vay, L.</creatorcontrib><title>Kelp detritus: Unutilized productivity or an unacknowledged trophic resource?</title><title>The Science of the total environment</title><addtitle>Sci Total Environ</addtitle><description>Kelp beds are one of the most productive marine systems and, while little of this production is directly consumed, there is growing evidence that kelp detritus is an essential food source for many detrital and suspension feeders, and forms an important component of offshore sedimentary carbon pools. However, the extent of the contribution of kelp detritus to the nutrition of coastal fauna is not well resolved. In this study, we compare the contribution of phytoplankton, kelp detritus, and waste from fish cages to the diet of a sentinel suspension feeder, the blue mussel (Mytilus edulis) using stable isotopes. We found a significant depletion in both 13C and 15N in kelp tissue with age (distance from stipe to the deteriorating distal end of the kelp frond) which may have biased dietary estimates in previous studies which have applied isotopic source values derived from fresh kelp. Our mixing models indicate that macroalgal detritus formed 59% of the diet of the mussels in Berehaven, Bantry Bay, Ireland. We support the isotopic mixing model results by modelling the relative production of phytoplankton, kelp, and salmon farm waste, and found the supply of C and N from kelp and phytoplankton far exceeded the requirements of the mussels with much less coming from the nearby fish cages. Monthly chlorophyll measurements indicated there was only sufficient phytoplankton density to support mussel growth during the spring and autumn, explaining our observation of patterns in the relative importance of utilization of kelp detritus. Where there is pressure to harvest kelp beds, this study highlights the supporting ecosystem service they provide as an important dietary source in coastal food webs and emphasises the need for appropriate management measures for this resource. [Display omitted] •The importance of kelp detritus in coastal food webs may have been underestimated.•Kelp detritus formed 50–60% of the diet of suspension feeders.•Phytoplankton and kelp productivity were similar, but &lt;1% sustained mussels.•Phytoplankton contribution to mussel tissue correlated with chlorophyll density.•Applying isotopic values of kelp distal tissue reduces bias in diet source models.</description><subject>agricultural wastes</subject><subject>Animals</subject><subject>autumn</subject><subject>Carbon</subject><subject>chlorophyll</subject><subject>Detritus</subject><subject>Diet</subject><subject>Ecosystem</subject><subject>ecosystem services</subject><subject>environment</subject><subject>fauna</subject><subject>fish</subject><subject>fish farms</subject><subject>Food Chain</subject><subject>Ireland</subject><subject>Kelp</subject><subject>Laminaria digitata</subject><subject>macroalgae</subject><subject>Mussel</subject><subject>mussels</subject><subject>Mytilus edulis</subject><subject>phytoplankton</subject><subject>spring</subject><subject>Suspension feeder</subject><subject>suspension feeding</subject><subject>Trophic contribution</subject><issn>0048-9697</issn><issn>1879-1026</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2022</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNqNkEtPGzEURq0KVELav0BnyWaCX-NHN1WEykMEsSlry2PfFKeTcWp7UoVfz0ShbOFu7uZ83706CH0jeEYwERerWXahxAL9dkYxpTPSMKLJJzQhSuqaYCqO0ARjrmottDxBpzmv8DhSkc_ohDW4IVzKCbq_g25TeSgplCF_rx77oYQuPIOvNin6wZWwDWVXxVTZvhp66_708V8H_vdIlBQ3T8FVCXIckoMfX9Dx0nYZvr7uKXq8-vnr8qZePFzfXs4XteMNKzVoZaVzTDmniWLWMUKlba2zjdZ4Ca0SLbeCt6qVDDiXXirNvBKKy5YIyqbo_NA7_vh3gFzMOmQHXWd7iEM2VDAhqeRYfgCllI5WsBpReUBdijknWJpNCmubdoZgs9duVuZNu9lrNwftY_Ls9cjQrsG_5f57HoH5AYDRyjZA2hdB78CHBK4YH8O7R14AMUiYqQ</recordid><startdate>20220510</startdate><enddate>20220510</enddate><creator>Walton, M.E.M.</creator><creator>Browne, R.</creator><creator>Griffiths, J.N.</creator><creator>Cartwright, D.</creator><creator>Robins, P.</creator><creator>Malham, S.K.</creator><creator>Le Vay, L.</creator><general>Elsevier B.V</general><scope>6I.</scope><scope>AAFTH</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>7S9</scope><scope>L.6</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20220510</creationdate><title>Kelp detritus: Unutilized productivity or an unacknowledged trophic resource?</title><author>Walton, M.E.M. ; Browne, R. ; Griffiths, J.N. ; Cartwright, D. ; Robins, P. ; Malham, S.K. ; Le Vay, L.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c453t-e98a7cc38cc9183ac3127abaca5990feb86b4a64b8b73e447d7893d86847b1623</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2022</creationdate><topic>agricultural wastes</topic><topic>Animals</topic><topic>autumn</topic><topic>Carbon</topic><topic>chlorophyll</topic><topic>Detritus</topic><topic>Diet</topic><topic>Ecosystem</topic><topic>ecosystem services</topic><topic>environment</topic><topic>fauna</topic><topic>fish</topic><topic>fish farms</topic><topic>Food Chain</topic><topic>Ireland</topic><topic>Kelp</topic><topic>Laminaria digitata</topic><topic>macroalgae</topic><topic>Mussel</topic><topic>mussels</topic><topic>Mytilus edulis</topic><topic>phytoplankton</topic><topic>spring</topic><topic>Suspension feeder</topic><topic>suspension feeding</topic><topic>Trophic contribution</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Walton, M.E.M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Browne, R.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Griffiths, J.N.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Cartwright, D.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Robins, P.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Malham, S.K.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Le Vay, L.</creatorcontrib><collection>ScienceDirect Open Access Titles</collection><collection>Elsevier:ScienceDirect:Open Access</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>AGRICOLA</collection><collection>AGRICOLA - Academic</collection><jtitle>The Science of the total environment</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Walton, M.E.M.</au><au>Browne, R.</au><au>Griffiths, J.N.</au><au>Cartwright, D.</au><au>Robins, P.</au><au>Malham, S.K.</au><au>Le Vay, L.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Kelp detritus: Unutilized productivity or an unacknowledged trophic resource?</atitle><jtitle>The Science of the total environment</jtitle><addtitle>Sci Total Environ</addtitle><date>2022-05-10</date><risdate>2022</risdate><volume>820</volume><spage>153191</spage><epage>153191</epage><pages>153191-153191</pages><artnum>153191</artnum><issn>0048-9697</issn><eissn>1879-1026</eissn><abstract>Kelp beds are one of the most productive marine systems and, while little of this production is directly consumed, there is growing evidence that kelp detritus is an essential food source for many detrital and suspension feeders, and forms an important component of offshore sedimentary carbon pools. However, the extent of the contribution of kelp detritus to the nutrition of coastal fauna is not well resolved. In this study, we compare the contribution of phytoplankton, kelp detritus, and waste from fish cages to the diet of a sentinel suspension feeder, the blue mussel (Mytilus edulis) using stable isotopes. We found a significant depletion in both 13C and 15N in kelp tissue with age (distance from stipe to the deteriorating distal end of the kelp frond) which may have biased dietary estimates in previous studies which have applied isotopic source values derived from fresh kelp. Our mixing models indicate that macroalgal detritus formed 59% of the diet of the mussels in Berehaven, Bantry Bay, Ireland. We support the isotopic mixing model results by modelling the relative production of phytoplankton, kelp, and salmon farm waste, and found the supply of C and N from kelp and phytoplankton far exceeded the requirements of the mussels with much less coming from the nearby fish cages. Monthly chlorophyll measurements indicated there was only sufficient phytoplankton density to support mussel growth during the spring and autumn, explaining our observation of patterns in the relative importance of utilization of kelp detritus. Where there is pressure to harvest kelp beds, this study highlights the supporting ecosystem service they provide as an important dietary source in coastal food webs and emphasises the need for appropriate management measures for this resource. [Display omitted] •The importance of kelp detritus in coastal food webs may have been underestimated.•Kelp detritus formed 50–60% of the diet of suspension feeders.•Phytoplankton and kelp productivity were similar, but &lt;1% sustained mussels.•Phytoplankton contribution to mussel tissue correlated with chlorophyll density.•Applying isotopic values of kelp distal tissue reduces bias in diet source models.</abstract><cop>Netherlands</cop><pub>Elsevier B.V</pub><pmid>35051477</pmid><doi>10.1016/j.scitotenv.2022.153191</doi><tpages>1</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0048-9697
ispartof The Science of the total environment, 2022-05, Vol.820, p.153191-153191, Article 153191
issn 0048-9697
1879-1026
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2622278108
source MEDLINE; Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals
subjects agricultural wastes
Animals
autumn
Carbon
chlorophyll
Detritus
Diet
Ecosystem
ecosystem services
environment
fauna
fish
fish farms
Food Chain
Ireland
Kelp
Laminaria digitata
macroalgae
Mussel
mussels
Mytilus edulis
phytoplankton
spring
Suspension feeder
suspension feeding
Trophic contribution
title Kelp detritus: Unutilized productivity or an unacknowledged trophic resource?
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-27T22%3A26%3A36IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Kelp%20detritus:%20Unutilized%20productivity%20or%20an%20unacknowledged%20trophic%20resource?&rft.jtitle=The%20Science%20of%20the%20total%20environment&rft.au=Walton,%20M.E.M.&rft.date=2022-05-10&rft.volume=820&rft.spage=153191&rft.epage=153191&rft.pages=153191-153191&rft.artnum=153191&rft.issn=0048-9697&rft.eissn=1879-1026&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2022.153191&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2636727407%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2622278108&rft_id=info:pmid/35051477&rft_els_id=S0048969722002819&rfr_iscdi=true