MRI-based radiomics analysis for differentiating phyllodes tumors of the breast from fibroadenomas

Objectives To evaluate the diagnostic performance of MRI-based radiomics model for differentiating phyllodes tumors of the breast from fibroadenomas. Methods This retrospective study included 88 patients (32 with phyllodes tumors and 56 with fibroadenomas) who underwent MRI. Radiomic features were e...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:European radiology 2022-06, Vol.32 (6), p.4090-4100
Hauptverfasser: Tsuchiya, Mitsuteru, Masui, Takayuki, Terauchi, Kazuma, Yamada, Takahiro, Katyayama, Motoyuki, Ichikawa, Shintaro, Noda, Yoshifumi, Goshima, Satoshi
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:Objectives To evaluate the diagnostic performance of MRI-based radiomics model for differentiating phyllodes tumors of the breast from fibroadenomas. Methods This retrospective study included 88 patients (32 with phyllodes tumors and 56 with fibroadenomas) who underwent MRI. Radiomic features were extracted from T2-weighted image, pre-contrast T1-weighted image, and the first-phase and late-phase dynamic contrast-enhanced MRIs. To create stable machine learning models and balanced classes, data augmentation was performed. A least absolute shrinkage and selection operator (LASSO) regression was performed to select features and build the radiomics model. A radiological model was constructed from conventional MRI features evaluated by radiologists. A combined model was constructed using both radiomics features and radiological features. Machine learning classifications were done using support vector machine, extreme gradient boosting, and random forest. The area under the receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve (AUC) was computed to assess the performance of each model. Results Among 1070 features, the LASSO logistic regression selected 35 features. Among three machine learning classifiers, support vector machine had the best performance. Compared to the radiological model (AUC: 0.77 ± 0.11), the radiomics model (AUC: 0.96 ± 0.04) and combined model (0.97 ± 0.03) had significantly improved AUC values (both p  
ISSN:1432-1084
0938-7994
1432-1084
DOI:10.1007/s00330-021-08510-8