Using kinematics to re-define the pull test as a quantitative biomarker of the postural response in normal pressure hydrocephalus patients

Quantitative biomarkers are needed for the diagnosis, monitoring and therapeutic assessment of postural instability in movement disorder patients. The goal of this study was to create a practical, objective measure of postural instability using kinematic measurements of the pull test. Twenty-one pat...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Experimental brain research 2022-03, Vol.240 (3), p.791-802
Hauptverfasser: Daly, Samuel, Hanson, Jacob T., Mavanji, Vibha, Gravely, Amy, Jean, James, Jonason, Alec, Lewis, Scott, Ashe, James, Looft, John M., McGovern, Robert A.
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 802
container_issue 3
container_start_page 791
container_title Experimental brain research
container_volume 240
creator Daly, Samuel
Hanson, Jacob T.
Mavanji, Vibha
Gravely, Amy
Jean, James
Jonason, Alec
Lewis, Scott
Ashe, James
Looft, John M.
McGovern, Robert A.
description Quantitative biomarkers are needed for the diagnosis, monitoring and therapeutic assessment of postural instability in movement disorder patients. The goal of this study was to create a practical, objective measure of postural instability using kinematic measurements of the pull test. Twenty-one patients with normal pressure hydrocephalus and 20 age-matched control subjects were fitted with inertial measurement units and underwent 10–20 pull tests of varying intensities performed by a trained clinician. Kinematic data were extracted for each pull test and aggregated. Patients participated in 103 sessions for a total of 1555 trials while controls participated in 20 sessions for a total of 299 trials. Patients were separated into groups by MDS-Unified Parkinson’s Disease Rating Scale (MDS-UPDRS) pull test score. The center of mass velocity profile easily distinguished between patient groups such that score increases correlated with decreases in peak velocity and later peak velocity onset. All patients except those scored as “3” demonstrated an increase in step length and decrease in reaction time with increasing pull intensity. Groups were distinguished by differences in the relationship of step length to pull intensity (slope) and their overall step length or reaction time regardless of pull intensity ( y -intercept). NPH patients scored as “normal” on the MDS-UPDRS scale were kinematically indistinguishable from age-matched control subjects during a standardized perturbation, but could be distinguished from controls by their response to a range of pull intensities. An instrumented, purposefully varied pull test produces kinematic metrics useful for distinguishing clinically meaningful differences within hydrocephalus patients as well as distinguishing these patients from healthy, control subjects.
doi_str_mv 10.1007/s00221-021-06292-5
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>gale_proqu</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2621021884</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><galeid>A696599288</galeid><sourcerecordid>A696599288</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c517t-44b029a376f4f0bb67dd1de11a2a597fbf8d7640d3c417e3083a9947929f0db53</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kttqFTEUhoModlt9AS8kIBRvpuY0h1yWUg9Q8MZeh8xkzd5pZ5JpDoW-gk9thqnWikhYhPz51k_WykLoLSWnlJD2YySEMVqRNRomWVU_QzsqOKsoJc1ztCOEikp0VB6hVzFer0fekpfoiNdEFETu0I-raN0e31gHs052iDh5HKAyMBYJpwPgJU8TThAT1hFrfJu1SzYV-A5wb_2sww0E7McN9jHloKfiERfvImDrsPNhLtJStJgD4MO9CX6A5aCnHPFSrMCl-Bq9GPUU4c3DfoyuPl18P_9SXX77_PX87LIaatqmSoieMKl524xiJH3ftMZQA5RqpmvZjv3YmbYRxPBB0BY46biWUrSSyZGYvubH6MPmuwR_m0tdarZxgGnSDnyOijWMlp52nSjo-7_Qa5-DK68rFO84ZaypH6m9nkBZN_oU9LCaqrNGNrWUrOsKdfoPqiwDsx28Kw0v-pOEkz8SDqCndIh-ysmWvj4F2QYOwccYYFRLsOVb7hUlap0UtU2KImusk6LWR797KC33M5jfKb9GowB8A2K5cnsIj7X_x_Ynkh_Iow</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2638312265</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Using kinematics to re-define the pull test as a quantitative biomarker of the postural response in normal pressure hydrocephalus patients</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>SpringerLink Journals</source><creator>Daly, Samuel ; Hanson, Jacob T. ; Mavanji, Vibha ; Gravely, Amy ; Jean, James ; Jonason, Alec ; Lewis, Scott ; Ashe, James ; Looft, John M. ; McGovern, Robert A.</creator><creatorcontrib>Daly, Samuel ; Hanson, Jacob T. ; Mavanji, Vibha ; Gravely, Amy ; Jean, James ; Jonason, Alec ; Lewis, Scott ; Ashe, James ; Looft, John M. ; McGovern, Robert A.</creatorcontrib><description>Quantitative biomarkers are needed for the diagnosis, monitoring and therapeutic assessment of postural instability in movement disorder patients. The goal of this study was to create a practical, objective measure of postural instability using kinematic measurements of the pull test. Twenty-one patients with normal pressure hydrocephalus and 20 age-matched control subjects were fitted with inertial measurement units and underwent 10–20 pull tests of varying intensities performed by a trained clinician. Kinematic data were extracted for each pull test and aggregated. Patients participated in 103 sessions for a total of 1555 trials while controls participated in 20 sessions for a total of 299 trials. Patients were separated into groups by MDS-Unified Parkinson’s Disease Rating Scale (MDS-UPDRS) pull test score. The center of mass velocity profile easily distinguished between patient groups such that score increases correlated with decreases in peak velocity and later peak velocity onset. All patients except those scored as “3” demonstrated an increase in step length and decrease in reaction time with increasing pull intensity. Groups were distinguished by differences in the relationship of step length to pull intensity (slope) and their overall step length or reaction time regardless of pull intensity ( y -intercept). NPH patients scored as “normal” on the MDS-UPDRS scale were kinematically indistinguishable from age-matched control subjects during a standardized perturbation, but could be distinguished from controls by their response to a range of pull intensities. An instrumented, purposefully varied pull test produces kinematic metrics useful for distinguishing clinically meaningful differences within hydrocephalus patients as well as distinguishing these patients from healthy, control subjects.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0014-4819</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1432-1106</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1007/s00221-021-06292-5</identifier><identifier>PMID: 35041069</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Berlin/Heidelberg: Springer Berlin Heidelberg</publisher><subject>Analysis ; Biological markers ; Biomarkers ; Biomechanical Phenomena ; Biomedical and Life Sciences ; Biomedicine ; Care and treatment ; Clinical trials ; Diagnosis ; Health aspects ; Humans ; Hydrocephalus ; Hydrocephalus, Normal Pressure - diagnosis ; Kinematics ; Movement disorders ; Neurodegenerative diseases ; Neurology ; Neurosciences ; Parkinson Disease - diagnosis ; Parkinson's disease ; Postural Balance - physiology ; Posture ; Reaction time task ; Research Article ; Risk factors ; Velocity</subject><ispartof>Experimental brain research, 2022-03, Vol.240 (3), p.791-802</ispartof><rights>This is a U.S. government work and not under copyright protection in the U.S.; foreign copyright protection may apply 2022</rights><rights>2022. This is a U.S. government work and not under copyright protection in the U.S.; foreign copyright protection may apply.</rights><rights>COPYRIGHT 2022 Springer</rights><rights>This is a U.S. government work and not under copyright protection in the U.S.; foreign copyright protection may apply 2022.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c517t-44b029a376f4f0bb67dd1de11a2a597fbf8d7640d3c417e3083a9947929f0db53</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c517t-44b029a376f4f0bb67dd1de11a2a597fbf8d7640d3c417e3083a9947929f0db53</cites><orcidid>0000-0003-0752-1899</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1007/s00221-021-06292-5$$EPDF$$P50$$Gspringer$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://link.springer.com/10.1007/s00221-021-06292-5$$EHTML$$P50$$Gspringer$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27924,27925,41488,42557,51319</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35041069$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Daly, Samuel</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hanson, Jacob T.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mavanji, Vibha</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gravely, Amy</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Jean, James</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Jonason, Alec</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lewis, Scott</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ashe, James</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Looft, John M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>McGovern, Robert A.</creatorcontrib><title>Using kinematics to re-define the pull test as a quantitative biomarker of the postural response in normal pressure hydrocephalus patients</title><title>Experimental brain research</title><addtitle>Exp Brain Res</addtitle><addtitle>Exp Brain Res</addtitle><description>Quantitative biomarkers are needed for the diagnosis, monitoring and therapeutic assessment of postural instability in movement disorder patients. The goal of this study was to create a practical, objective measure of postural instability using kinematic measurements of the pull test. Twenty-one patients with normal pressure hydrocephalus and 20 age-matched control subjects were fitted with inertial measurement units and underwent 10–20 pull tests of varying intensities performed by a trained clinician. Kinematic data were extracted for each pull test and aggregated. Patients participated in 103 sessions for a total of 1555 trials while controls participated in 20 sessions for a total of 299 trials. Patients were separated into groups by MDS-Unified Parkinson’s Disease Rating Scale (MDS-UPDRS) pull test score. The center of mass velocity profile easily distinguished between patient groups such that score increases correlated with decreases in peak velocity and later peak velocity onset. All patients except those scored as “3” demonstrated an increase in step length and decrease in reaction time with increasing pull intensity. Groups were distinguished by differences in the relationship of step length to pull intensity (slope) and their overall step length or reaction time regardless of pull intensity ( y -intercept). NPH patients scored as “normal” on the MDS-UPDRS scale were kinematically indistinguishable from age-matched control subjects during a standardized perturbation, but could be distinguished from controls by their response to a range of pull intensities. An instrumented, purposefully varied pull test produces kinematic metrics useful for distinguishing clinically meaningful differences within hydrocephalus patients as well as distinguishing these patients from healthy, control subjects.</description><subject>Analysis</subject><subject>Biological markers</subject><subject>Biomarkers</subject><subject>Biomechanical Phenomena</subject><subject>Biomedical and Life Sciences</subject><subject>Biomedicine</subject><subject>Care and treatment</subject><subject>Clinical trials</subject><subject>Diagnosis</subject><subject>Health aspects</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Hydrocephalus</subject><subject>Hydrocephalus, Normal Pressure - diagnosis</subject><subject>Kinematics</subject><subject>Movement disorders</subject><subject>Neurodegenerative diseases</subject><subject>Neurology</subject><subject>Neurosciences</subject><subject>Parkinson Disease - diagnosis</subject><subject>Parkinson's disease</subject><subject>Postural Balance - physiology</subject><subject>Posture</subject><subject>Reaction time task</subject><subject>Research Article</subject><subject>Risk factors</subject><subject>Velocity</subject><issn>0014-4819</issn><issn>1432-1106</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2022</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><sourceid>ABUWG</sourceid><sourceid>AFKRA</sourceid><sourceid>AZQEC</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>CCPQU</sourceid><sourceid>DWQXO</sourceid><sourceid>GNUQQ</sourceid><recordid>eNp9kttqFTEUhoModlt9AS8kIBRvpuY0h1yWUg9Q8MZeh8xkzd5pZ5JpDoW-gk9thqnWikhYhPz51k_WykLoLSWnlJD2YySEMVqRNRomWVU_QzsqOKsoJc1ztCOEikp0VB6hVzFer0fekpfoiNdEFETu0I-raN0e31gHs052iDh5HKAyMBYJpwPgJU8TThAT1hFrfJu1SzYV-A5wb_2sww0E7McN9jHloKfiERfvImDrsPNhLtJStJgD4MO9CX6A5aCnHPFSrMCl-Bq9GPUU4c3DfoyuPl18P_9SXX77_PX87LIaatqmSoieMKl524xiJH3ftMZQA5RqpmvZjv3YmbYRxPBB0BY46biWUrSSyZGYvubH6MPmuwR_m0tdarZxgGnSDnyOijWMlp52nSjo-7_Qa5-DK68rFO84ZaypH6m9nkBZN_oU9LCaqrNGNrWUrOsKdfoPqiwDsx28Kw0v-pOEkz8SDqCndIh-ysmWvj4F2QYOwccYYFRLsOVb7hUlap0UtU2KImusk6LWR797KC33M5jfKb9GowB8A2K5cnsIj7X_x_Ynkh_Iow</recordid><startdate>20220301</startdate><enddate>20220301</enddate><creator>Daly, Samuel</creator><creator>Hanson, Jacob T.</creator><creator>Mavanji, Vibha</creator><creator>Gravely, Amy</creator><creator>Jean, James</creator><creator>Jonason, Alec</creator><creator>Lewis, Scott</creator><creator>Ashe, James</creator><creator>Looft, John M.</creator><creator>McGovern, Robert A.</creator><general>Springer Berlin Heidelberg</general><general>Springer</general><general>Springer Nature B.V</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>0-V</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7QP</scope><scope>7QR</scope><scope>7RV</scope><scope>7TK</scope><scope>7TM</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88E</scope><scope>88G</scope><scope>88J</scope><scope>8AO</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>ALSLI</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>KB0</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>M1P</scope><scope>M2M</scope><scope>M2R</scope><scope>NAPCQ</scope><scope>P64</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>PSYQQ</scope><scope>Q9U</scope><scope>RC3</scope><scope>7X8</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0752-1899</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20220301</creationdate><title>Using kinematics to re-define the pull test as a quantitative biomarker of the postural response in normal pressure hydrocephalus patients</title><author>Daly, Samuel ; Hanson, Jacob T. ; Mavanji, Vibha ; Gravely, Amy ; Jean, James ; Jonason, Alec ; Lewis, Scott ; Ashe, James ; Looft, John M. ; McGovern, Robert A.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c517t-44b029a376f4f0bb67dd1de11a2a597fbf8d7640d3c417e3083a9947929f0db53</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2022</creationdate><topic>Analysis</topic><topic>Biological markers</topic><topic>Biomarkers</topic><topic>Biomechanical Phenomena</topic><topic>Biomedical and Life Sciences</topic><topic>Biomedicine</topic><topic>Care and treatment</topic><topic>Clinical trials</topic><topic>Diagnosis</topic><topic>Health aspects</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Hydrocephalus</topic><topic>Hydrocephalus, Normal Pressure - diagnosis</topic><topic>Kinematics</topic><topic>Movement disorders</topic><topic>Neurodegenerative diseases</topic><topic>Neurology</topic><topic>Neurosciences</topic><topic>Parkinson Disease - diagnosis</topic><topic>Parkinson's disease</topic><topic>Postural Balance - physiology</topic><topic>Posture</topic><topic>Reaction time task</topic><topic>Research Article</topic><topic>Risk factors</topic><topic>Velocity</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Daly, Samuel</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hanson, Jacob T.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mavanji, Vibha</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gravely, Amy</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Jean, James</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Jonason, Alec</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lewis, Scott</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ashe, James</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Looft, John M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>McGovern, Robert A.</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Social Sciences Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Calcium &amp; Calcified Tissue Abstracts</collection><collection>Chemoreception Abstracts</collection><collection>Nursing &amp; Allied Health Database</collection><collection>Neurosciences Abstracts</collection><collection>Nucleic Acids Abstracts</collection><collection>Health &amp; Medical Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Medical Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Psychology Database (Alumni)</collection><collection>Social Science Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Pharma Collection</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>Social Science Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>ProQuest Health &amp; Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Nursing &amp; Allied Health Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Health &amp; Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Medical Database</collection><collection>Psychology Database</collection><collection>Social Science Database</collection><collection>Nursing &amp; Allied Health Premium</collection><collection>Biotechnology and BioEngineering Abstracts</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>ProQuest One Psychology</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><collection>Genetics Abstracts</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Experimental brain research</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Daly, Samuel</au><au>Hanson, Jacob T.</au><au>Mavanji, Vibha</au><au>Gravely, Amy</au><au>Jean, James</au><au>Jonason, Alec</au><au>Lewis, Scott</au><au>Ashe, James</au><au>Looft, John M.</au><au>McGovern, Robert A.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Using kinematics to re-define the pull test as a quantitative biomarker of the postural response in normal pressure hydrocephalus patients</atitle><jtitle>Experimental brain research</jtitle><stitle>Exp Brain Res</stitle><addtitle>Exp Brain Res</addtitle><date>2022-03-01</date><risdate>2022</risdate><volume>240</volume><issue>3</issue><spage>791</spage><epage>802</epage><pages>791-802</pages><issn>0014-4819</issn><eissn>1432-1106</eissn><abstract>Quantitative biomarkers are needed for the diagnosis, monitoring and therapeutic assessment of postural instability in movement disorder patients. The goal of this study was to create a practical, objective measure of postural instability using kinematic measurements of the pull test. Twenty-one patients with normal pressure hydrocephalus and 20 age-matched control subjects were fitted with inertial measurement units and underwent 10–20 pull tests of varying intensities performed by a trained clinician. Kinematic data were extracted for each pull test and aggregated. Patients participated in 103 sessions for a total of 1555 trials while controls participated in 20 sessions for a total of 299 trials. Patients were separated into groups by MDS-Unified Parkinson’s Disease Rating Scale (MDS-UPDRS) pull test score. The center of mass velocity profile easily distinguished between patient groups such that score increases correlated with decreases in peak velocity and later peak velocity onset. All patients except those scored as “3” demonstrated an increase in step length and decrease in reaction time with increasing pull intensity. Groups were distinguished by differences in the relationship of step length to pull intensity (slope) and their overall step length or reaction time regardless of pull intensity ( y -intercept). NPH patients scored as “normal” on the MDS-UPDRS scale were kinematically indistinguishable from age-matched control subjects during a standardized perturbation, but could be distinguished from controls by their response to a range of pull intensities. An instrumented, purposefully varied pull test produces kinematic metrics useful for distinguishing clinically meaningful differences within hydrocephalus patients as well as distinguishing these patients from healthy, control subjects.</abstract><cop>Berlin/Heidelberg</cop><pub>Springer Berlin Heidelberg</pub><pmid>35041069</pmid><doi>10.1007/s00221-021-06292-5</doi><tpages>12</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0752-1899</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0014-4819
ispartof Experimental brain research, 2022-03, Vol.240 (3), p.791-802
issn 0014-4819
1432-1106
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2621021884
source MEDLINE; SpringerLink Journals
subjects Analysis
Biological markers
Biomarkers
Biomechanical Phenomena
Biomedical and Life Sciences
Biomedicine
Care and treatment
Clinical trials
Diagnosis
Health aspects
Humans
Hydrocephalus
Hydrocephalus, Normal Pressure - diagnosis
Kinematics
Movement disorders
Neurodegenerative diseases
Neurology
Neurosciences
Parkinson Disease - diagnosis
Parkinson's disease
Postural Balance - physiology
Posture
Reaction time task
Research Article
Risk factors
Velocity
title Using kinematics to re-define the pull test as a quantitative biomarker of the postural response in normal pressure hydrocephalus patients
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-26T10%3A07%3A05IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-gale_proqu&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Using%20kinematics%20to%20re-define%20the%20pull%20test%20as%20a%20quantitative%20biomarker%20of%20the%20postural%20response%20in%20normal%20pressure%20hydrocephalus%20patients&rft.jtitle=Experimental%20brain%20research&rft.au=Daly,%20Samuel&rft.date=2022-03-01&rft.volume=240&rft.issue=3&rft.spage=791&rft.epage=802&rft.pages=791-802&rft.issn=0014-4819&rft.eissn=1432-1106&rft_id=info:doi/10.1007/s00221-021-06292-5&rft_dat=%3Cgale_proqu%3EA696599288%3C/gale_proqu%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2638312265&rft_id=info:pmid/35041069&rft_galeid=A696599288&rfr_iscdi=true