Analgesia for major laparoscopic abdominal surgery: a randomised feasibility trial using intrathecal morphine

Effective pain control enhances patient recovery after surgery. Laparoscopic techniques for major abdominal surgery are increasingly utilised to reduce surgical trauma. Intrathecal morphine is an attractive analgesic option that is gaining popularity. However, limited evidence guides its use in the...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Anaesthesia 2022-04, Vol.77 (4), p.428-437
Hauptverfasser: Pirie, K, Doane, M A, Riedel, B, Myles, P S
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 437
container_issue 4
container_start_page 428
container_title Anaesthesia
container_volume 77
creator Pirie, K
Doane, M A
Riedel, B
Myles, P S
description Effective pain control enhances patient recovery after surgery. Laparoscopic techniques for major abdominal surgery are increasingly utilised to reduce surgical trauma. Intrathecal morphine is an attractive analgesic option that is gaining popularity. However, limited evidence guides its use in the setting of laparoscopic surgery. In addition, enhanced recovery after surgery pathways advocate opioid-sparing techniques. We conducted a feasibility trial to compare intrathecal morphine with non-neuraxial analgesia in laparoscopic or laparoscopic-assisted major abdominal surgery to inform the design of a future large clinical trial. This multicentre, double-blind, randomised controlled trial was conducted at two tertiary hospitals in Australia. Fifty-one patients were randomly allocated to receive either intrathecal morphine (intervention group) or a sham subcutaneous injection of normal saline in the lumbar area (control group) immediately before the induction of general anaesthesia. Co-primary outcomes were patient recruitment and successful adherence to treatment allocation as per the study protocol. The primary endpoints of feasibility and protocol adherence were met with a 46% recruitment rate (51 of 110 eligible patients) and 96% protocol adherence. There was only one patient with failed access to the intrathecal space. For secondary endpoints, fewer patients in the intrathecal morphine group required opioids in the post-anaesthesia care unit, their postoperative pain scores at rest were lower across the four time-points measured (p = 0.007), but not dynamic pain scores (p = 0.061), and pruritus was more common following intrathecal morphine (p = 0.007). Total oral morphine equivalents until postoperative day 3 were less in the intrathecal morphine group (median (95%CI) difference 82 (-13 to 168) mg), but this reduction was not statistically significant (p = 0.10). These findings support conducting a definitive clinical trial.
doi_str_mv 10.1111/anae.15651
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2620780082</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2620780082</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c315t-2fe4bcf05eb75b6c8abc130311881e92e6554c754a85d8ceb1b5be10666502c33</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNpd0clKBDEQBuAgio7LxQeQgBcRWitJJxO9ibiB4EXPTSVTPWbozaT7MG9vxu1gDgkUH0WqfsaOBVyIfC6xQ7oQ2mixxWZCGV1IKMttNgMAVcgSrvbYfkorACGtsLtsT2lQVhg9Y-1Nh82SUkBe95G3uMp3gwPGPvl-CJ6jW_RtyIqnKS4prq858ojdpppowWvCFFxowrjmYwzZTSl0Sx66MeL4Tj5X2j4O76GjQ7ZTY5Po6Oc9YG_3d6-3j8Xzy8PT7c1z4ZXQYyFrKp2vQZOba2e8ReeFAiWEtYKuJBmtSz_XJVq9sJ6ccNqRAGOMBumVOmBn332H2H9MlMYq_9VT02BH_ZQqaSTMLYCVmZ7-o6t-inncjSpBG5VhVuffyue9pEh1NcTQYlxXAqpNCNUmhOorhIxPflpOrqXFH_3duvoEmM-DXA</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2640563780</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Analgesia for major laparoscopic abdominal surgery: a randomised feasibility trial using intrathecal morphine</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Wiley Online Library Journals</source><source>Wiley Online Library Free Content</source><source>EZB Electronic Journals Library</source><creator>Pirie, K ; Doane, M A ; Riedel, B ; Myles, P S</creator><creatorcontrib>Pirie, K ; Doane, M A ; Riedel, B ; Myles, P S</creatorcontrib><description>Effective pain control enhances patient recovery after surgery. Laparoscopic techniques for major abdominal surgery are increasingly utilised to reduce surgical trauma. Intrathecal morphine is an attractive analgesic option that is gaining popularity. However, limited evidence guides its use in the setting of laparoscopic surgery. In addition, enhanced recovery after surgery pathways advocate opioid-sparing techniques. We conducted a feasibility trial to compare intrathecal morphine with non-neuraxial analgesia in laparoscopic or laparoscopic-assisted major abdominal surgery to inform the design of a future large clinical trial. This multicentre, double-blind, randomised controlled trial was conducted at two tertiary hospitals in Australia. Fifty-one patients were randomly allocated to receive either intrathecal morphine (intervention group) or a sham subcutaneous injection of normal saline in the lumbar area (control group) immediately before the induction of general anaesthesia. Co-primary outcomes were patient recruitment and successful adherence to treatment allocation as per the study protocol. The primary endpoints of feasibility and protocol adherence were met with a 46% recruitment rate (51 of 110 eligible patients) and 96% protocol adherence. There was only one patient with failed access to the intrathecal space. For secondary endpoints, fewer patients in the intrathecal morphine group required opioids in the post-anaesthesia care unit, their postoperative pain scores at rest were lower across the four time-points measured (p = 0.007), but not dynamic pain scores (p = 0.061), and pruritus was more common following intrathecal morphine (p = 0.007). Total oral morphine equivalents until postoperative day 3 were less in the intrathecal morphine group (median (95%CI) difference 82 (-13 to 168) mg), but this reduction was not statistically significant (p = 0.10). These findings support conducting a definitive clinical trial.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0003-2409</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1365-2044</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1111/anae.15651</identifier><identifier>PMID: 35038165</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>England: Blackwell Publishing Ltd</publisher><subject>Abdomen ; Abdominal surgery ; Analgesia ; Analgesia, Patient-Controlled - methods ; Analgesics ; Analgesics, Opioid - therapeutic use ; Anesthesia ; Anesthetics, Local ; Clinical trials ; Double-Blind Method ; Feasibility ; Feasibility Studies ; Humans ; Injections, Spinal ; Laparoscopy ; Morphine ; Morphine - therapeutic use ; Narcotics ; Opioids ; Pain ; Pain perception ; Pain, Postoperative - drug therapy ; Pain, Postoperative - prevention &amp; control ; Patients ; Pruritus ; Recovery (Medical) ; Recruitment ; Statistical analysis ; Surgery ; Trauma</subject><ispartof>Anaesthesia, 2022-04, Vol.77 (4), p.428-437</ispartof><rights>2022 Association of Anaesthetists.</rights><rights>Copyright © 2022 Association of Anaesthetists</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c315t-2fe4bcf05eb75b6c8abc130311881e92e6554c754a85d8ceb1b5be10666502c33</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c315t-2fe4bcf05eb75b6c8abc130311881e92e6554c754a85d8ceb1b5be10666502c33</cites><orcidid>0000-0002-8860-898X ; 0000-0002-3324-5456 ; 0000-0003-2577-3918 ; 0000-0002-1620-9613</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27924,27925</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35038165$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Pirie, K</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Doane, M A</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Riedel, B</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Myles, P S</creatorcontrib><title>Analgesia for major laparoscopic abdominal surgery: a randomised feasibility trial using intrathecal morphine</title><title>Anaesthesia</title><addtitle>Anaesthesia</addtitle><description>Effective pain control enhances patient recovery after surgery. Laparoscopic techniques for major abdominal surgery are increasingly utilised to reduce surgical trauma. Intrathecal morphine is an attractive analgesic option that is gaining popularity. However, limited evidence guides its use in the setting of laparoscopic surgery. In addition, enhanced recovery after surgery pathways advocate opioid-sparing techniques. We conducted a feasibility trial to compare intrathecal morphine with non-neuraxial analgesia in laparoscopic or laparoscopic-assisted major abdominal surgery to inform the design of a future large clinical trial. This multicentre, double-blind, randomised controlled trial was conducted at two tertiary hospitals in Australia. Fifty-one patients were randomly allocated to receive either intrathecal morphine (intervention group) or a sham subcutaneous injection of normal saline in the lumbar area (control group) immediately before the induction of general anaesthesia. Co-primary outcomes were patient recruitment and successful adherence to treatment allocation as per the study protocol. The primary endpoints of feasibility and protocol adherence were met with a 46% recruitment rate (51 of 110 eligible patients) and 96% protocol adherence. There was only one patient with failed access to the intrathecal space. For secondary endpoints, fewer patients in the intrathecal morphine group required opioids in the post-anaesthesia care unit, their postoperative pain scores at rest were lower across the four time-points measured (p = 0.007), but not dynamic pain scores (p = 0.061), and pruritus was more common following intrathecal morphine (p = 0.007). Total oral morphine equivalents until postoperative day 3 were less in the intrathecal morphine group (median (95%CI) difference 82 (-13 to 168) mg), but this reduction was not statistically significant (p = 0.10). These findings support conducting a definitive clinical trial.</description><subject>Abdomen</subject><subject>Abdominal surgery</subject><subject>Analgesia</subject><subject>Analgesia, Patient-Controlled - methods</subject><subject>Analgesics</subject><subject>Analgesics, Opioid - therapeutic use</subject><subject>Anesthesia</subject><subject>Anesthetics, Local</subject><subject>Clinical trials</subject><subject>Double-Blind Method</subject><subject>Feasibility</subject><subject>Feasibility Studies</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Injections, Spinal</subject><subject>Laparoscopy</subject><subject>Morphine</subject><subject>Morphine - therapeutic use</subject><subject>Narcotics</subject><subject>Opioids</subject><subject>Pain</subject><subject>Pain perception</subject><subject>Pain, Postoperative - drug therapy</subject><subject>Pain, Postoperative - prevention &amp; control</subject><subject>Patients</subject><subject>Pruritus</subject><subject>Recovery (Medical)</subject><subject>Recruitment</subject><subject>Statistical analysis</subject><subject>Surgery</subject><subject>Trauma</subject><issn>0003-2409</issn><issn>1365-2044</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2022</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNpd0clKBDEQBuAgio7LxQeQgBcRWitJJxO9ibiB4EXPTSVTPWbozaT7MG9vxu1gDgkUH0WqfsaOBVyIfC6xQ7oQ2mixxWZCGV1IKMttNgMAVcgSrvbYfkorACGtsLtsT2lQVhg9Y-1Nh82SUkBe95G3uMp3gwPGPvl-CJ6jW_RtyIqnKS4prq858ojdpppowWvCFFxowrjmYwzZTSl0Sx66MeL4Tj5X2j4O76GjQ7ZTY5Po6Oc9YG_3d6-3j8Xzy8PT7c1z4ZXQYyFrKp2vQZOba2e8ReeFAiWEtYKuJBmtSz_XJVq9sJ6ccNqRAGOMBumVOmBn332H2H9MlMYq_9VT02BH_ZQqaSTMLYCVmZ7-o6t-inncjSpBG5VhVuffyue9pEh1NcTQYlxXAqpNCNUmhOorhIxPflpOrqXFH_3duvoEmM-DXA</recordid><startdate>202204</startdate><enddate>202204</enddate><creator>Pirie, K</creator><creator>Doane, M A</creator><creator>Riedel, B</creator><creator>Myles, P S</creator><general>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7T5</scope><scope>7U7</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>H94</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>7X8</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8860-898X</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3324-5456</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2577-3918</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1620-9613</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>202204</creationdate><title>Analgesia for major laparoscopic abdominal surgery: a randomised feasibility trial using intrathecal morphine</title><author>Pirie, K ; Doane, M A ; Riedel, B ; Myles, P S</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c315t-2fe4bcf05eb75b6c8abc130311881e92e6554c754a85d8ceb1b5be10666502c33</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2022</creationdate><topic>Abdomen</topic><topic>Abdominal surgery</topic><topic>Analgesia</topic><topic>Analgesia, Patient-Controlled - methods</topic><topic>Analgesics</topic><topic>Analgesics, Opioid - therapeutic use</topic><topic>Anesthesia</topic><topic>Anesthetics, Local</topic><topic>Clinical trials</topic><topic>Double-Blind Method</topic><topic>Feasibility</topic><topic>Feasibility Studies</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Injections, Spinal</topic><topic>Laparoscopy</topic><topic>Morphine</topic><topic>Morphine - therapeutic use</topic><topic>Narcotics</topic><topic>Opioids</topic><topic>Pain</topic><topic>Pain perception</topic><topic>Pain, Postoperative - drug therapy</topic><topic>Pain, Postoperative - prevention &amp; control</topic><topic>Patients</topic><topic>Pruritus</topic><topic>Recovery (Medical)</topic><topic>Recruitment</topic><topic>Statistical analysis</topic><topic>Surgery</topic><topic>Trauma</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Pirie, K</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Doane, M A</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Riedel, B</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Myles, P S</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Immunology Abstracts</collection><collection>Toxicology Abstracts</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>AIDS and Cancer Research Abstracts</collection><collection>ProQuest Health &amp; Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Anaesthesia</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Pirie, K</au><au>Doane, M A</au><au>Riedel, B</au><au>Myles, P S</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Analgesia for major laparoscopic abdominal surgery: a randomised feasibility trial using intrathecal morphine</atitle><jtitle>Anaesthesia</jtitle><addtitle>Anaesthesia</addtitle><date>2022-04</date><risdate>2022</risdate><volume>77</volume><issue>4</issue><spage>428</spage><epage>437</epage><pages>428-437</pages><issn>0003-2409</issn><eissn>1365-2044</eissn><abstract>Effective pain control enhances patient recovery after surgery. Laparoscopic techniques for major abdominal surgery are increasingly utilised to reduce surgical trauma. Intrathecal morphine is an attractive analgesic option that is gaining popularity. However, limited evidence guides its use in the setting of laparoscopic surgery. In addition, enhanced recovery after surgery pathways advocate opioid-sparing techniques. We conducted a feasibility trial to compare intrathecal morphine with non-neuraxial analgesia in laparoscopic or laparoscopic-assisted major abdominal surgery to inform the design of a future large clinical trial. This multicentre, double-blind, randomised controlled trial was conducted at two tertiary hospitals in Australia. Fifty-one patients were randomly allocated to receive either intrathecal morphine (intervention group) or a sham subcutaneous injection of normal saline in the lumbar area (control group) immediately before the induction of general anaesthesia. Co-primary outcomes were patient recruitment and successful adherence to treatment allocation as per the study protocol. The primary endpoints of feasibility and protocol adherence were met with a 46% recruitment rate (51 of 110 eligible patients) and 96% protocol adherence. There was only one patient with failed access to the intrathecal space. For secondary endpoints, fewer patients in the intrathecal morphine group required opioids in the post-anaesthesia care unit, their postoperative pain scores at rest were lower across the four time-points measured (p = 0.007), but not dynamic pain scores (p = 0.061), and pruritus was more common following intrathecal morphine (p = 0.007). Total oral morphine equivalents until postoperative day 3 were less in the intrathecal morphine group (median (95%CI) difference 82 (-13 to 168) mg), but this reduction was not statistically significant (p = 0.10). These findings support conducting a definitive clinical trial.</abstract><cop>England</cop><pub>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</pub><pmid>35038165</pmid><doi>10.1111/anae.15651</doi><tpages>10</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8860-898X</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3324-5456</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2577-3918</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1620-9613</orcidid></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0003-2409
ispartof Anaesthesia, 2022-04, Vol.77 (4), p.428-437
issn 0003-2409
1365-2044
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2620780082
source MEDLINE; Wiley Online Library Journals; Wiley Online Library Free Content; EZB Electronic Journals Library
subjects Abdomen
Abdominal surgery
Analgesia
Analgesia, Patient-Controlled - methods
Analgesics
Analgesics, Opioid - therapeutic use
Anesthesia
Anesthetics, Local
Clinical trials
Double-Blind Method
Feasibility
Feasibility Studies
Humans
Injections, Spinal
Laparoscopy
Morphine
Morphine - therapeutic use
Narcotics
Opioids
Pain
Pain perception
Pain, Postoperative - drug therapy
Pain, Postoperative - prevention & control
Patients
Pruritus
Recovery (Medical)
Recruitment
Statistical analysis
Surgery
Trauma
title Analgesia for major laparoscopic abdominal surgery: a randomised feasibility trial using intrathecal morphine
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-03T18%3A52%3A56IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Analgesia%20for%20major%20laparoscopic%20abdominal%20surgery:%20a%20randomised%20feasibility%20trial%20using%20intrathecal%20morphine&rft.jtitle=Anaesthesia&rft.au=Pirie,%20K&rft.date=2022-04&rft.volume=77&rft.issue=4&rft.spage=428&rft.epage=437&rft.pages=428-437&rft.issn=0003-2409&rft.eissn=1365-2044&rft_id=info:doi/10.1111/anae.15651&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2620780082%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2640563780&rft_id=info:pmid/35038165&rfr_iscdi=true