The effect of task on object processing revealed by EEG decoding
Recent studies showed that task demand affects object representations in higher‐level visual areas and beyond but not so much in earlier areas. There are, however, limitations in those studies including the relatively weak manipulation of task due to the use of familiar real‐life objects, the low te...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | The European journal of neuroscience 2022-03, Vol.55 (5), p.1174-1199 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 1199 |
---|---|
container_issue | 5 |
container_start_page | 1174 |
container_title | The European journal of neuroscience |
container_volume | 55 |
creator | Yip, Hoi Ming Ken Cheung, Leo Y. T. Ngan, Vince S. H. Wong, Yetta Kwailing Wong, Alan C.‐N. |
description | Recent studies showed that task demand affects object representations in higher‐level visual areas and beyond but not so much in earlier areas. There are, however, limitations in those studies including the relatively weak manipulation of task due to the use of familiar real‐life objects, the low temporal resolution in functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) and the emphasis on the amount and not the source of information carried by brain activations. In the current study, observers categorised images of artificial objects in one of two orthogonal dimensions, shape and texture, while their brain activity was recorded with electroencephalogram (EEG). Results showed that object processing along the texture dimension was affected by task demand starting from a relatively late time (320‐ to 370‐ms time window) after image onset. The findings are consistent with the view that task exerts an effect on the later phases of object processing.
Observers categorised images of artificial objects in one of two orthogonal dimensions, shape and texture. Multivariate pattern analysis of electroencephalogram (EEG) data showed that object processing along the texture dimension was altered by task demand starting from about 320–370 ms after image onset. The findings are consistent with the view that task exerts an effect on the later phases of object processing. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1111/ejn.15598 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2619542185</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2637225398</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3888-85f081467214159940ccec2692437014f22ce3f7cd3139f3d4daa6e7da992d523</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp10E1LwzAcBvAgipvTg19AAl700C0vTZvclFGnMvQywVvokn-0s2tnsyr79mZ2ehDMJZD8eHh4EDqlZEjDGcGiGlIhlNxDfRonJFIikfuoT5TgkaTJcw8deb8ghMgkFoeoxwVhnHHSR1ezV8DgHJg1rh1e5_4N1xWu54vty6qpDXhfVC-4gQ_IS7B4vsFZNsEWTG3DxzE6cHnp4WR3D9DTTTYb30bTx8nd-HoaGS6ljKRwRIZuKaMxFUrFxBgwLFEs5imhsWPMAHepsZxy5biNbZ4nkNpcKWYF4wN00eWGTu8t-LVeFt5AWeYV1K3XLKFKxIxKEej5H7qo26YK7YLiKWOCKxnUZadMU3vfgNOrpljmzUZTorez6jCr_p412LNdYjtfgv2VPzsGMOrAZ1HC5v8knd0_dJFf8V5-Iw</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2637225398</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>The effect of task on object processing revealed by EEG decoding</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Wiley Online Library Journals Frontfile Complete</source><creator>Yip, Hoi Ming Ken ; Cheung, Leo Y. T. ; Ngan, Vince S. H. ; Wong, Yetta Kwailing ; Wong, Alan C.‐N.</creator><creatorcontrib>Yip, Hoi Ming Ken ; Cheung, Leo Y. T. ; Ngan, Vince S. H. ; Wong, Yetta Kwailing ; Wong, Alan C.‐N.</creatorcontrib><description>Recent studies showed that task demand affects object representations in higher‐level visual areas and beyond but not so much in earlier areas. There are, however, limitations in those studies including the relatively weak manipulation of task due to the use of familiar real‐life objects, the low temporal resolution in functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) and the emphasis on the amount and not the source of information carried by brain activations. In the current study, observers categorised images of artificial objects in one of two orthogonal dimensions, shape and texture, while their brain activity was recorded with electroencephalogram (EEG). Results showed that object processing along the texture dimension was affected by task demand starting from a relatively late time (320‐ to 370‐ms time window) after image onset. The findings are consistent with the view that task exerts an effect on the later phases of object processing.
Observers categorised images of artificial objects in one of two orthogonal dimensions, shape and texture. Multivariate pattern analysis of electroencephalogram (EEG) data showed that object processing along the texture dimension was altered by task demand starting from about 320–370 ms after image onset. The findings are consistent with the view that task exerts an effect on the later phases of object processing.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0953-816X</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1460-9568</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1111/ejn.15598</identifier><identifier>PMID: 35023230</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>France: Wiley Subscription Services, Inc</publisher><subject>attention ; Brain - diagnostic imaging ; Brain Mapping ; EEG ; Electroencephalography ; Functional magnetic resonance imaging ; Information processing ; Magnetic Resonance Imaging - methods ; MVPA ; Neuroimaging ; object recognition ; Pattern recognition ; Pattern Recognition, Visual ; task ; top‐down effect</subject><ispartof>The European journal of neuroscience, 2022-03, Vol.55 (5), p.1174-1199</ispartof><rights>2022 Federation of European Neuroscience Societies and John Wiley & Sons Ltd</rights><rights>2022 Federation of European Neuroscience Societies and John Wiley & Sons Ltd.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3888-85f081467214159940ccec2692437014f22ce3f7cd3139f3d4daa6e7da992d523</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3888-85f081467214159940ccec2692437014f22ce3f7cd3139f3d4daa6e7da992d523</cites><orcidid>0000-0003-1793-2878 ; 0000-0001-9652-9184 ; 0000-0002-8243-2047 ; 0000-0002-2129-3485</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1111%2Fejn.15598$$EPDF$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1111%2Fejn.15598$$EHTML$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,1411,27901,27902,45550,45551</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35023230$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Yip, Hoi Ming Ken</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Cheung, Leo Y. T.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ngan, Vince S. H.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wong, Yetta Kwailing</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wong, Alan C.‐N.</creatorcontrib><title>The effect of task on object processing revealed by EEG decoding</title><title>The European journal of neuroscience</title><addtitle>Eur J Neurosci</addtitle><description>Recent studies showed that task demand affects object representations in higher‐level visual areas and beyond but not so much in earlier areas. There are, however, limitations in those studies including the relatively weak manipulation of task due to the use of familiar real‐life objects, the low temporal resolution in functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) and the emphasis on the amount and not the source of information carried by brain activations. In the current study, observers categorised images of artificial objects in one of two orthogonal dimensions, shape and texture, while their brain activity was recorded with electroencephalogram (EEG). Results showed that object processing along the texture dimension was affected by task demand starting from a relatively late time (320‐ to 370‐ms time window) after image onset. The findings are consistent with the view that task exerts an effect on the later phases of object processing.
Observers categorised images of artificial objects in one of two orthogonal dimensions, shape and texture. Multivariate pattern analysis of electroencephalogram (EEG) data showed that object processing along the texture dimension was altered by task demand starting from about 320–370 ms after image onset. The findings are consistent with the view that task exerts an effect on the later phases of object processing.</description><subject>attention</subject><subject>Brain - diagnostic imaging</subject><subject>Brain Mapping</subject><subject>EEG</subject><subject>Electroencephalography</subject><subject>Functional magnetic resonance imaging</subject><subject>Information processing</subject><subject>Magnetic Resonance Imaging - methods</subject><subject>MVPA</subject><subject>Neuroimaging</subject><subject>object recognition</subject><subject>Pattern recognition</subject><subject>Pattern Recognition, Visual</subject><subject>task</subject><subject>top‐down effect</subject><issn>0953-816X</issn><issn>1460-9568</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2022</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNp10E1LwzAcBvAgipvTg19AAl700C0vTZvclFGnMvQywVvokn-0s2tnsyr79mZ2ehDMJZD8eHh4EDqlZEjDGcGiGlIhlNxDfRonJFIikfuoT5TgkaTJcw8deb8ghMgkFoeoxwVhnHHSR1ezV8DgHJg1rh1e5_4N1xWu54vty6qpDXhfVC-4gQ_IS7B4vsFZNsEWTG3DxzE6cHnp4WR3D9DTTTYb30bTx8nd-HoaGS6ljKRwRIZuKaMxFUrFxBgwLFEs5imhsWPMAHepsZxy5biNbZ4nkNpcKWYF4wN00eWGTu8t-LVeFt5AWeYV1K3XLKFKxIxKEej5H7qo26YK7YLiKWOCKxnUZadMU3vfgNOrpljmzUZTorez6jCr_p412LNdYjtfgv2VPzsGMOrAZ1HC5v8knd0_dJFf8V5-Iw</recordid><startdate>202203</startdate><enddate>202203</enddate><creator>Yip, Hoi Ming Ken</creator><creator>Cheung, Leo Y. T.</creator><creator>Ngan, Vince S. H.</creator><creator>Wong, Yetta Kwailing</creator><creator>Wong, Alan C.‐N.</creator><general>Wiley Subscription Services, Inc</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7QP</scope><scope>7QR</scope><scope>7TK</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>P64</scope><scope>7X8</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1793-2878</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9652-9184</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8243-2047</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2129-3485</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>202203</creationdate><title>The effect of task on object processing revealed by EEG decoding</title><author>Yip, Hoi Ming Ken ; Cheung, Leo Y. T. ; Ngan, Vince S. H. ; Wong, Yetta Kwailing ; Wong, Alan C.‐N.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c3888-85f081467214159940ccec2692437014f22ce3f7cd3139f3d4daa6e7da992d523</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2022</creationdate><topic>attention</topic><topic>Brain - diagnostic imaging</topic><topic>Brain Mapping</topic><topic>EEG</topic><topic>Electroencephalography</topic><topic>Functional magnetic resonance imaging</topic><topic>Information processing</topic><topic>Magnetic Resonance Imaging - methods</topic><topic>MVPA</topic><topic>Neuroimaging</topic><topic>object recognition</topic><topic>Pattern recognition</topic><topic>Pattern Recognition, Visual</topic><topic>task</topic><topic>top‐down effect</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Yip, Hoi Ming Ken</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Cheung, Leo Y. T.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ngan, Vince S. H.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wong, Yetta Kwailing</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wong, Alan C.‐N.</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Calcium & Calcified Tissue Abstracts</collection><collection>Chemoreception Abstracts</collection><collection>Neurosciences Abstracts</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>Biotechnology and BioEngineering Abstracts</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>The European journal of neuroscience</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Yip, Hoi Ming Ken</au><au>Cheung, Leo Y. T.</au><au>Ngan, Vince S. H.</au><au>Wong, Yetta Kwailing</au><au>Wong, Alan C.‐N.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>The effect of task on object processing revealed by EEG decoding</atitle><jtitle>The European journal of neuroscience</jtitle><addtitle>Eur J Neurosci</addtitle><date>2022-03</date><risdate>2022</risdate><volume>55</volume><issue>5</issue><spage>1174</spage><epage>1199</epage><pages>1174-1199</pages><issn>0953-816X</issn><eissn>1460-9568</eissn><abstract>Recent studies showed that task demand affects object representations in higher‐level visual areas and beyond but not so much in earlier areas. There are, however, limitations in those studies including the relatively weak manipulation of task due to the use of familiar real‐life objects, the low temporal resolution in functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) and the emphasis on the amount and not the source of information carried by brain activations. In the current study, observers categorised images of artificial objects in one of two orthogonal dimensions, shape and texture, while their brain activity was recorded with electroencephalogram (EEG). Results showed that object processing along the texture dimension was affected by task demand starting from a relatively late time (320‐ to 370‐ms time window) after image onset. The findings are consistent with the view that task exerts an effect on the later phases of object processing.
Observers categorised images of artificial objects in one of two orthogonal dimensions, shape and texture. Multivariate pattern analysis of electroencephalogram (EEG) data showed that object processing along the texture dimension was altered by task demand starting from about 320–370 ms after image onset. The findings are consistent with the view that task exerts an effect on the later phases of object processing.</abstract><cop>France</cop><pub>Wiley Subscription Services, Inc</pub><pmid>35023230</pmid><doi>10.1111/ejn.15598</doi><tpages>26</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1793-2878</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9652-9184</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8243-2047</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2129-3485</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0953-816X |
ispartof | The European journal of neuroscience, 2022-03, Vol.55 (5), p.1174-1199 |
issn | 0953-816X 1460-9568 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2619542185 |
source | MEDLINE; Wiley Online Library Journals Frontfile Complete |
subjects | attention Brain - diagnostic imaging Brain Mapping EEG Electroencephalography Functional magnetic resonance imaging Information processing Magnetic Resonance Imaging - methods MVPA Neuroimaging object recognition Pattern recognition Pattern Recognition, Visual task top‐down effect |
title | The effect of task on object processing revealed by EEG decoding |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-04T04%3A02%3A15IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=The%20effect%20of%20task%20on%20object%20processing%20revealed%20by%20EEG%20decoding&rft.jtitle=The%20European%20journal%20of%20neuroscience&rft.au=Yip,%20Hoi%20Ming%20Ken&rft.date=2022-03&rft.volume=55&rft.issue=5&rft.spage=1174&rft.epage=1199&rft.pages=1174-1199&rft.issn=0953-816X&rft.eissn=1460-9568&rft_id=info:doi/10.1111/ejn.15598&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2637225398%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2637225398&rft_id=info:pmid/35023230&rfr_iscdi=true |