The effect of task on object processing revealed by EEG decoding

Recent studies showed that task demand affects object representations in higher‐level visual areas and beyond but not so much in earlier areas. There are, however, limitations in those studies including the relatively weak manipulation of task due to the use of familiar real‐life objects, the low te...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:The European journal of neuroscience 2022-03, Vol.55 (5), p.1174-1199
Hauptverfasser: Yip, Hoi Ming Ken, Cheung, Leo Y. T., Ngan, Vince S. H., Wong, Yetta Kwailing, Wong, Alan C.‐N.
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 1199
container_issue 5
container_start_page 1174
container_title The European journal of neuroscience
container_volume 55
creator Yip, Hoi Ming Ken
Cheung, Leo Y. T.
Ngan, Vince S. H.
Wong, Yetta Kwailing
Wong, Alan C.‐N.
description Recent studies showed that task demand affects object representations in higher‐level visual areas and beyond but not so much in earlier areas. There are, however, limitations in those studies including the relatively weak manipulation of task due to the use of familiar real‐life objects, the low temporal resolution in functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) and the emphasis on the amount and not the source of information carried by brain activations. In the current study, observers categorised images of artificial objects in one of two orthogonal dimensions, shape and texture, while their brain activity was recorded with electroencephalogram (EEG). Results showed that object processing along the texture dimension was affected by task demand starting from a relatively late time (320‐ to 370‐ms time window) after image onset. The findings are consistent with the view that task exerts an effect on the later phases of object processing. Observers categorised images of artificial objects in one of two orthogonal dimensions, shape and texture. Multivariate pattern analysis of electroencephalogram (EEG) data showed that object processing along the texture dimension was altered by task demand starting from about 320–370 ms after image onset. The findings are consistent with the view that task exerts an effect on the later phases of object processing.
doi_str_mv 10.1111/ejn.15598
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2619542185</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2637225398</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3888-85f081467214159940ccec2692437014f22ce3f7cd3139f3d4daa6e7da992d523</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp10E1LwzAcBvAgipvTg19AAl700C0vTZvclFGnMvQywVvokn-0s2tnsyr79mZ2ehDMJZD8eHh4EDqlZEjDGcGiGlIhlNxDfRonJFIikfuoT5TgkaTJcw8deb8ghMgkFoeoxwVhnHHSR1ezV8DgHJg1rh1e5_4N1xWu54vty6qpDXhfVC-4gQ_IS7B4vsFZNsEWTG3DxzE6cHnp4WR3D9DTTTYb30bTx8nd-HoaGS6ljKRwRIZuKaMxFUrFxBgwLFEs5imhsWPMAHepsZxy5biNbZ4nkNpcKWYF4wN00eWGTu8t-LVeFt5AWeYV1K3XLKFKxIxKEej5H7qo26YK7YLiKWOCKxnUZadMU3vfgNOrpljmzUZTorez6jCr_p412LNdYjtfgv2VPzsGMOrAZ1HC5v8knd0_dJFf8V5-Iw</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2637225398</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>The effect of task on object processing revealed by EEG decoding</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Wiley Online Library Journals Frontfile Complete</source><creator>Yip, Hoi Ming Ken ; Cheung, Leo Y. T. ; Ngan, Vince S. H. ; Wong, Yetta Kwailing ; Wong, Alan C.‐N.</creator><creatorcontrib>Yip, Hoi Ming Ken ; Cheung, Leo Y. T. ; Ngan, Vince S. H. ; Wong, Yetta Kwailing ; Wong, Alan C.‐N.</creatorcontrib><description>Recent studies showed that task demand affects object representations in higher‐level visual areas and beyond but not so much in earlier areas. There are, however, limitations in those studies including the relatively weak manipulation of task due to the use of familiar real‐life objects, the low temporal resolution in functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) and the emphasis on the amount and not the source of information carried by brain activations. In the current study, observers categorised images of artificial objects in one of two orthogonal dimensions, shape and texture, while their brain activity was recorded with electroencephalogram (EEG). Results showed that object processing along the texture dimension was affected by task demand starting from a relatively late time (320‐ to 370‐ms time window) after image onset. The findings are consistent with the view that task exerts an effect on the later phases of object processing. Observers categorised images of artificial objects in one of two orthogonal dimensions, shape and texture. Multivariate pattern analysis of electroencephalogram (EEG) data showed that object processing along the texture dimension was altered by task demand starting from about 320–370 ms after image onset. The findings are consistent with the view that task exerts an effect on the later phases of object processing.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0953-816X</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1460-9568</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1111/ejn.15598</identifier><identifier>PMID: 35023230</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>France: Wiley Subscription Services, Inc</publisher><subject>attention ; Brain - diagnostic imaging ; Brain Mapping ; EEG ; Electroencephalography ; Functional magnetic resonance imaging ; Information processing ; Magnetic Resonance Imaging - methods ; MVPA ; Neuroimaging ; object recognition ; Pattern recognition ; Pattern Recognition, Visual ; task ; top‐down effect</subject><ispartof>The European journal of neuroscience, 2022-03, Vol.55 (5), p.1174-1199</ispartof><rights>2022 Federation of European Neuroscience Societies and John Wiley &amp; Sons Ltd</rights><rights>2022 Federation of European Neuroscience Societies and John Wiley &amp; Sons Ltd.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3888-85f081467214159940ccec2692437014f22ce3f7cd3139f3d4daa6e7da992d523</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3888-85f081467214159940ccec2692437014f22ce3f7cd3139f3d4daa6e7da992d523</cites><orcidid>0000-0003-1793-2878 ; 0000-0001-9652-9184 ; 0000-0002-8243-2047 ; 0000-0002-2129-3485</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1111%2Fejn.15598$$EPDF$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1111%2Fejn.15598$$EHTML$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,1411,27901,27902,45550,45551</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35023230$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Yip, Hoi Ming Ken</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Cheung, Leo Y. T.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ngan, Vince S. H.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wong, Yetta Kwailing</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wong, Alan C.‐N.</creatorcontrib><title>The effect of task on object processing revealed by EEG decoding</title><title>The European journal of neuroscience</title><addtitle>Eur J Neurosci</addtitle><description>Recent studies showed that task demand affects object representations in higher‐level visual areas and beyond but not so much in earlier areas. There are, however, limitations in those studies including the relatively weak manipulation of task due to the use of familiar real‐life objects, the low temporal resolution in functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) and the emphasis on the amount and not the source of information carried by brain activations. In the current study, observers categorised images of artificial objects in one of two orthogonal dimensions, shape and texture, while their brain activity was recorded with electroencephalogram (EEG). Results showed that object processing along the texture dimension was affected by task demand starting from a relatively late time (320‐ to 370‐ms time window) after image onset. The findings are consistent with the view that task exerts an effect on the later phases of object processing. Observers categorised images of artificial objects in one of two orthogonal dimensions, shape and texture. Multivariate pattern analysis of electroencephalogram (EEG) data showed that object processing along the texture dimension was altered by task demand starting from about 320–370 ms after image onset. The findings are consistent with the view that task exerts an effect on the later phases of object processing.</description><subject>attention</subject><subject>Brain - diagnostic imaging</subject><subject>Brain Mapping</subject><subject>EEG</subject><subject>Electroencephalography</subject><subject>Functional magnetic resonance imaging</subject><subject>Information processing</subject><subject>Magnetic Resonance Imaging - methods</subject><subject>MVPA</subject><subject>Neuroimaging</subject><subject>object recognition</subject><subject>Pattern recognition</subject><subject>Pattern Recognition, Visual</subject><subject>task</subject><subject>top‐down effect</subject><issn>0953-816X</issn><issn>1460-9568</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2022</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNp10E1LwzAcBvAgipvTg19AAl700C0vTZvclFGnMvQywVvokn-0s2tnsyr79mZ2ehDMJZD8eHh4EDqlZEjDGcGiGlIhlNxDfRonJFIikfuoT5TgkaTJcw8deb8ghMgkFoeoxwVhnHHSR1ezV8DgHJg1rh1e5_4N1xWu54vty6qpDXhfVC-4gQ_IS7B4vsFZNsEWTG3DxzE6cHnp4WR3D9DTTTYb30bTx8nd-HoaGS6ljKRwRIZuKaMxFUrFxBgwLFEs5imhsWPMAHepsZxy5biNbZ4nkNpcKWYF4wN00eWGTu8t-LVeFt5AWeYV1K3XLKFKxIxKEej5H7qo26YK7YLiKWOCKxnUZadMU3vfgNOrpljmzUZTorez6jCr_p412LNdYjtfgv2VPzsGMOrAZ1HC5v8knd0_dJFf8V5-Iw</recordid><startdate>202203</startdate><enddate>202203</enddate><creator>Yip, Hoi Ming Ken</creator><creator>Cheung, Leo Y. T.</creator><creator>Ngan, Vince S. H.</creator><creator>Wong, Yetta Kwailing</creator><creator>Wong, Alan C.‐N.</creator><general>Wiley Subscription Services, Inc</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7QP</scope><scope>7QR</scope><scope>7TK</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>P64</scope><scope>7X8</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1793-2878</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9652-9184</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8243-2047</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2129-3485</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>202203</creationdate><title>The effect of task on object processing revealed by EEG decoding</title><author>Yip, Hoi Ming Ken ; Cheung, Leo Y. T. ; Ngan, Vince S. H. ; Wong, Yetta Kwailing ; Wong, Alan C.‐N.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c3888-85f081467214159940ccec2692437014f22ce3f7cd3139f3d4daa6e7da992d523</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2022</creationdate><topic>attention</topic><topic>Brain - diagnostic imaging</topic><topic>Brain Mapping</topic><topic>EEG</topic><topic>Electroencephalography</topic><topic>Functional magnetic resonance imaging</topic><topic>Information processing</topic><topic>Magnetic Resonance Imaging - methods</topic><topic>MVPA</topic><topic>Neuroimaging</topic><topic>object recognition</topic><topic>Pattern recognition</topic><topic>Pattern Recognition, Visual</topic><topic>task</topic><topic>top‐down effect</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Yip, Hoi Ming Ken</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Cheung, Leo Y. T.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ngan, Vince S. H.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wong, Yetta Kwailing</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wong, Alan C.‐N.</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Calcium &amp; Calcified Tissue Abstracts</collection><collection>Chemoreception Abstracts</collection><collection>Neurosciences Abstracts</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>Biotechnology and BioEngineering Abstracts</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>The European journal of neuroscience</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Yip, Hoi Ming Ken</au><au>Cheung, Leo Y. T.</au><au>Ngan, Vince S. H.</au><au>Wong, Yetta Kwailing</au><au>Wong, Alan C.‐N.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>The effect of task on object processing revealed by EEG decoding</atitle><jtitle>The European journal of neuroscience</jtitle><addtitle>Eur J Neurosci</addtitle><date>2022-03</date><risdate>2022</risdate><volume>55</volume><issue>5</issue><spage>1174</spage><epage>1199</epage><pages>1174-1199</pages><issn>0953-816X</issn><eissn>1460-9568</eissn><abstract>Recent studies showed that task demand affects object representations in higher‐level visual areas and beyond but not so much in earlier areas. There are, however, limitations in those studies including the relatively weak manipulation of task due to the use of familiar real‐life objects, the low temporal resolution in functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) and the emphasis on the amount and not the source of information carried by brain activations. In the current study, observers categorised images of artificial objects in one of two orthogonal dimensions, shape and texture, while their brain activity was recorded with electroencephalogram (EEG). Results showed that object processing along the texture dimension was affected by task demand starting from a relatively late time (320‐ to 370‐ms time window) after image onset. The findings are consistent with the view that task exerts an effect on the later phases of object processing. Observers categorised images of artificial objects in one of two orthogonal dimensions, shape and texture. Multivariate pattern analysis of electroencephalogram (EEG) data showed that object processing along the texture dimension was altered by task demand starting from about 320–370 ms after image onset. The findings are consistent with the view that task exerts an effect on the later phases of object processing.</abstract><cop>France</cop><pub>Wiley Subscription Services, Inc</pub><pmid>35023230</pmid><doi>10.1111/ejn.15598</doi><tpages>26</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1793-2878</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9652-9184</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8243-2047</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2129-3485</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0953-816X
ispartof The European journal of neuroscience, 2022-03, Vol.55 (5), p.1174-1199
issn 0953-816X
1460-9568
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2619542185
source MEDLINE; Wiley Online Library Journals Frontfile Complete
subjects attention
Brain - diagnostic imaging
Brain Mapping
EEG
Electroencephalography
Functional magnetic resonance imaging
Information processing
Magnetic Resonance Imaging - methods
MVPA
Neuroimaging
object recognition
Pattern recognition
Pattern Recognition, Visual
task
top‐down effect
title The effect of task on object processing revealed by EEG decoding
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-04T04%3A02%3A15IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=The%20effect%20of%20task%20on%20object%20processing%20revealed%20by%20EEG%20decoding&rft.jtitle=The%20European%20journal%20of%20neuroscience&rft.au=Yip,%20Hoi%20Ming%20Ken&rft.date=2022-03&rft.volume=55&rft.issue=5&rft.spage=1174&rft.epage=1199&rft.pages=1174-1199&rft.issn=0953-816X&rft.eissn=1460-9568&rft_id=info:doi/10.1111/ejn.15598&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2637225398%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2637225398&rft_id=info:pmid/35023230&rfr_iscdi=true