Biosimilar competition: Early learning

Biologics accounted for roughly $145 billion in spending in 2018. They are also the fastest growing segment of the pharmaceutical industry. The Biological Price Competition and Innovation Act (BPCIA) of 2010 created an abbreviated pathway for biosimilar products to promote price competition in the m...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Health economics 2022-04, Vol.31 (4), p.647-663
Hauptverfasser: Frank, Richard G., Shahzad, Mahnum, Kesselheim, Aaron S., Feldman, William
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 663
container_issue 4
container_start_page 647
container_title Health economics
container_volume 31
creator Frank, Richard G.
Shahzad, Mahnum
Kesselheim, Aaron S.
Feldman, William
description Biologics accounted for roughly $145 billion in spending in 2018. They are also the fastest growing segment of the pharmaceutical industry. The Biological Price Competition and Innovation Act (BPCIA) of 2010 created an abbreviated pathway for biosimilar products to promote price competition in the market for biological drugs. There was great anticipation that the BPCIA would lead to a moderation in drug prices driven by market competition. The observed levels of competition and the accompanying savings have not reached those expected levels. We investigate the early impacts of biosimilar competition on the use and pricing of biological products. We focus especially on the ways in which altered market structures stemming from the implementation of the BPCIA have affected the prices for biological products subject to biosimilar competition. We do so by studying seven products that have recently faced biosimilar competition. We estimate fixed effects and Instrumental Variables models to estimate the impact of market competition on prices. Our results indicate that in the range of one to three entrants each additional marketed product results in a reduction in weighted average market prices of between 5.4% and 7% points. These are the result of a combination of reductions in originator prices and shifting in demand to biosimilar products.
doi_str_mv 10.1002/hec.4471
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2619542029</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2619542029</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4391-3359bfba26406a163153df324783871afedd24a172a3654d25fcd16d0c36c7413</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp10MtKAzEUBuAgiq1V8AlkQBA3o7mncaelWqHgRsFdSJOMpsxMatJB-vamtl4QXOVAPv5z-AE4RvACQYgvX525oFSgHdBHUMoSQQZ31zMTpcQE9sBBSnMI8x_k-6BHGMQEY9YHZzc-JN_4WsfChGbhln7pQ3tVjHWsV0XtdGx9-3II9ipdJ3e0fQfg6Xb8OJqU04e7-9H1tDSUSFQSwuSsmmnMKeQacYIYsRXBVAzJUCBdOWsx1UhgTTijFrPKWMQtNIQbQREZgPNN7iKGt86lpWp8Mq6udetClxTmSDKKIZaZnv6h89DFNl-XFeGISCl-BZoYUoquUovoGx1XCkG17k7l7tS6u0xPtoHdrHH2G36VlUGxAc6E1qefJCG5yJex50zKDXn3tVv9u0tNxqPPnR_0-X6m</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2636139971</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Biosimilar competition: Early learning</title><source>Applied Social Sciences Index &amp; Abstracts (ASSIA)</source><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Wiley Online Library Journals Frontfile Complete</source><creator>Frank, Richard G. ; Shahzad, Mahnum ; Kesselheim, Aaron S. ; Feldman, William</creator><creatorcontrib>Frank, Richard G. ; Shahzad, Mahnum ; Kesselheim, Aaron S. ; Feldman, William</creatorcontrib><description>Biologics accounted for roughly $145 billion in spending in 2018. They are also the fastest growing segment of the pharmaceutical industry. The Biological Price Competition and Innovation Act (BPCIA) of 2010 created an abbreviated pathway for biosimilar products to promote price competition in the market for biological drugs. There was great anticipation that the BPCIA would lead to a moderation in drug prices driven by market competition. The observed levels of competition and the accompanying savings have not reached those expected levels. We investigate the early impacts of biosimilar competition on the use and pricing of biological products. We focus especially on the ways in which altered market structures stemming from the implementation of the BPCIA have affected the prices for biological products subject to biosimilar competition. We do so by studying seven products that have recently faced biosimilar competition. We estimate fixed effects and Instrumental Variables models to estimate the impact of market competition on prices. Our results indicate that in the range of one to three entrants each additional marketed product results in a reduction in weighted average market prices of between 5.4% and 7% points. These are the result of a combination of reductions in originator prices and shifting in demand to biosimilar products.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1057-9230</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1099-1050</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1002/hec.4471</identifier><identifier>PMID: 35023225</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>England: Wiley Periodicals Inc</publisher><subject>Biological products ; biosimilar ; Biosimilar Pharmaceuticals ; Competition ; Costs and Cost Analysis ; Drug Costs ; Drug Industry ; Drug prices ; Economic Competition ; Health economics ; Humans ; Innovations ; Learning ; Moderation ; Pharmaceutical industry ; Prices</subject><ispartof>Health economics, 2022-04, Vol.31 (4), p.647-663</ispartof><rights>2022 John Wiley &amp; Sons Ltd.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4391-3359bfba26406a163153df324783871afedd24a172a3654d25fcd16d0c36c7413</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4391-3359bfba26406a163153df324783871afedd24a172a3654d25fcd16d0c36c7413</cites><orcidid>0000-0003-1551-7072 ; 0000-0003-3467-5869</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1002%2Fhec.4471$$EPDF$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1002%2Fhec.4471$$EHTML$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,1411,27901,27902,30976,45550,45551</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35023225$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Frank, Richard G.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Shahzad, Mahnum</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kesselheim, Aaron S.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Feldman, William</creatorcontrib><title>Biosimilar competition: Early learning</title><title>Health economics</title><addtitle>Health Econ</addtitle><description>Biologics accounted for roughly $145 billion in spending in 2018. They are also the fastest growing segment of the pharmaceutical industry. The Biological Price Competition and Innovation Act (BPCIA) of 2010 created an abbreviated pathway for biosimilar products to promote price competition in the market for biological drugs. There was great anticipation that the BPCIA would lead to a moderation in drug prices driven by market competition. The observed levels of competition and the accompanying savings have not reached those expected levels. We investigate the early impacts of biosimilar competition on the use and pricing of biological products. We focus especially on the ways in which altered market structures stemming from the implementation of the BPCIA have affected the prices for biological products subject to biosimilar competition. We do so by studying seven products that have recently faced biosimilar competition. We estimate fixed effects and Instrumental Variables models to estimate the impact of market competition on prices. Our results indicate that in the range of one to three entrants each additional marketed product results in a reduction in weighted average market prices of between 5.4% and 7% points. These are the result of a combination of reductions in originator prices and shifting in demand to biosimilar products.</description><subject>Biological products</subject><subject>biosimilar</subject><subject>Biosimilar Pharmaceuticals</subject><subject>Competition</subject><subject>Costs and Cost Analysis</subject><subject>Drug Costs</subject><subject>Drug Industry</subject><subject>Drug prices</subject><subject>Economic Competition</subject><subject>Health economics</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Innovations</subject><subject>Learning</subject><subject>Moderation</subject><subject>Pharmaceutical industry</subject><subject>Prices</subject><issn>1057-9230</issn><issn>1099-1050</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2022</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><sourceid>7QJ</sourceid><recordid>eNp10MtKAzEUBuAgiq1V8AlkQBA3o7mncaelWqHgRsFdSJOMpsxMatJB-vamtl4QXOVAPv5z-AE4RvACQYgvX525oFSgHdBHUMoSQQZ31zMTpcQE9sBBSnMI8x_k-6BHGMQEY9YHZzc-JN_4WsfChGbhln7pQ3tVjHWsV0XtdGx9-3II9ipdJ3e0fQfg6Xb8OJqU04e7-9H1tDSUSFQSwuSsmmnMKeQacYIYsRXBVAzJUCBdOWsx1UhgTTijFrPKWMQtNIQbQREZgPNN7iKGt86lpWp8Mq6udetClxTmSDKKIZaZnv6h89DFNl-XFeGISCl-BZoYUoquUovoGx1XCkG17k7l7tS6u0xPtoHdrHH2G36VlUGxAc6E1qefJCG5yJex50zKDXn3tVv9u0tNxqPPnR_0-X6m</recordid><startdate>202204</startdate><enddate>202204</enddate><creator>Frank, Richard G.</creator><creator>Shahzad, Mahnum</creator><creator>Kesselheim, Aaron S.</creator><creator>Feldman, William</creator><general>Wiley Periodicals Inc</general><scope>OQ6</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7QJ</scope><scope>7X8</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1551-7072</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3467-5869</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>202204</creationdate><title>Biosimilar competition: Early learning</title><author>Frank, Richard G. ; Shahzad, Mahnum ; Kesselheim, Aaron S. ; Feldman, William</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c4391-3359bfba26406a163153df324783871afedd24a172a3654d25fcd16d0c36c7413</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2022</creationdate><topic>Biological products</topic><topic>biosimilar</topic><topic>Biosimilar Pharmaceuticals</topic><topic>Competition</topic><topic>Costs and Cost Analysis</topic><topic>Drug Costs</topic><topic>Drug Industry</topic><topic>Drug prices</topic><topic>Economic Competition</topic><topic>Health economics</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Innovations</topic><topic>Learning</topic><topic>Moderation</topic><topic>Pharmaceutical industry</topic><topic>Prices</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Frank, Richard G.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Shahzad, Mahnum</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kesselheim, Aaron S.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Feldman, William</creatorcontrib><collection>ECONIS</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Applied Social Sciences Index &amp; Abstracts (ASSIA)</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Health economics</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Frank, Richard G.</au><au>Shahzad, Mahnum</au><au>Kesselheim, Aaron S.</au><au>Feldman, William</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Biosimilar competition: Early learning</atitle><jtitle>Health economics</jtitle><addtitle>Health Econ</addtitle><date>2022-04</date><risdate>2022</risdate><volume>31</volume><issue>4</issue><spage>647</spage><epage>663</epage><pages>647-663</pages><issn>1057-9230</issn><eissn>1099-1050</eissn><abstract>Biologics accounted for roughly $145 billion in spending in 2018. They are also the fastest growing segment of the pharmaceutical industry. The Biological Price Competition and Innovation Act (BPCIA) of 2010 created an abbreviated pathway for biosimilar products to promote price competition in the market for biological drugs. There was great anticipation that the BPCIA would lead to a moderation in drug prices driven by market competition. The observed levels of competition and the accompanying savings have not reached those expected levels. We investigate the early impacts of biosimilar competition on the use and pricing of biological products. We focus especially on the ways in which altered market structures stemming from the implementation of the BPCIA have affected the prices for biological products subject to biosimilar competition. We do so by studying seven products that have recently faced biosimilar competition. We estimate fixed effects and Instrumental Variables models to estimate the impact of market competition on prices. Our results indicate that in the range of one to three entrants each additional marketed product results in a reduction in weighted average market prices of between 5.4% and 7% points. These are the result of a combination of reductions in originator prices and shifting in demand to biosimilar products.</abstract><cop>England</cop><pub>Wiley Periodicals Inc</pub><pmid>35023225</pmid><doi>10.1002/hec.4471</doi><tpages>0</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1551-7072</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3467-5869</orcidid></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 1057-9230
ispartof Health economics, 2022-04, Vol.31 (4), p.647-663
issn 1057-9230
1099-1050
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2619542029
source Applied Social Sciences Index & Abstracts (ASSIA); MEDLINE; Wiley Online Library Journals Frontfile Complete
subjects Biological products
biosimilar
Biosimilar Pharmaceuticals
Competition
Costs and Cost Analysis
Drug Costs
Drug Industry
Drug prices
Economic Competition
Health economics
Humans
Innovations
Learning
Moderation
Pharmaceutical industry
Prices
title Biosimilar competition: Early learning
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-05T00%3A34%3A19IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Biosimilar%20competition:%20Early%20learning&rft.jtitle=Health%20economics&rft.au=Frank,%20Richard%20G.&rft.date=2022-04&rft.volume=31&rft.issue=4&rft.spage=647&rft.epage=663&rft.pages=647-663&rft.issn=1057-9230&rft.eissn=1099-1050&rft_id=info:doi/10.1002/hec.4471&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2619542029%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2636139971&rft_id=info:pmid/35023225&rfr_iscdi=true