Local Minima and Factor Rotations in Exploratory Factor Analysis

In exploratory factor analysis, factor rotation algorithms can converge to local solutions (i.e., local minima) when they are initiated from different starting points. To better understand this problem, we performed three studies that investigated the prevalence and correlates of local solutions wit...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Psychological methods 2023-10, Vol.28 (5), p.1122-1141
Hauptverfasser: Nguyen, Hoang V., Waller, Niels G.
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 1141
container_issue 5
container_start_page 1122
container_title Psychological methods
container_volume 28
creator Nguyen, Hoang V.
Waller, Niels G.
description In exploratory factor analysis, factor rotation algorithms can converge to local solutions (i.e., local minima) when they are initiated from different starting points. To better understand this problem, we performed three studies that investigated the prevalence and correlates of local solutions with five factor rotation algorithms: varimax, oblimin, entropy, and geomin (orthogonal and oblique). In total, we simulated 16,000 data sets and performed more than 57 million factor rotations to examine the influence of (a) factor loading size, (b) number of factor indicators, (c) factor cross loadings, (d) factor correlation size, (e) factor loading standardization, (f) sample size, and (g) model approximation error on the frequency of local solutions in factor rotation. We also examined local solutions in an exploratory factor analysis of an open source data set that included 54 personality items. Across three studies, all five algorithms converged to local solutions under some conditions with geomin (orthogonal and oblique) producing the highest number of local solutions. Follow-up analyses showed that, when factor rotations produced multiple solutions, the factor pattern with the maximum hyperplane count (rather than the lowest complexity value) was typically closest in mean squared error to the population factor pattern. Translational Abstract In exploratory factor analysis, factor rotation algorithms can converge to local solutions (i.e., local minima) when they are initiated from different starting points. To better understand this problem, we performed three studies that investigated the prevalence and correlates of local solutions with five factor rotation algorithms: varimax, oblimin, entropy, and geomin (orthogonal and oblique). In total, we simulated 16,000 data sets and performed more than 57 million factor rotations to examine the influence of (a) factor loading size, (b) number of factor indicators, (c) factor cross loadings, (d) factor correlation size, (e) factor loading standardization, (f) sample size, and (g) model approximation error on the frequency of local solutions in factor rotation. We also examined local solutions in an exploratory factor analysis of an open source data set that included 54 personality items. Across three studies, all five algorithms converged to local solutions under some conditions with geomin (orthogonal and oblique) producing the highest number of local solutions. Follow-up analyses showed that, when factor rotatio
doi_str_mv 10.1037/met0000467
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2618237863</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2617018549</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-a352t-57755f5754cc002aa7af47424fbda8e479ad77df1dde7678759c51787d0196d93</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNpdkFtLxDAQhYMo3l_8AVLwRcRqrk3y5iLrBVYEUfAtjEkKlW5Tkxbcf2_WXRWclzPMfBxmDkJHBF8QzOTl3A84F6_kBtolmumS8Ipt5h4rWmqlX3fQXkrvGBPOFN9GO4xrjYmSu-hqFiy0xUPTNXMooHPFDdghxOIpDDA0oUtF0xXTz74NEfJ88bOfdNAuUpMO0FYNbfKHa91HLzfT5-u7cvZ4e389mZXABB1KIaUQtZCCW4sxBZBQc8kpr98cKM-lBielq4lzXlZSSaGtIFkdJrpymu2j05VvH8PH6NNg5k2yvm2h82FMhlZEUSZVxTJ68g99D2PM935TMj8u-NLwbEXZGFKKvjZ9zBnEhSHYLHM1f7lm-HhtOb7NvftFf4LMwPkKgB5MnxYW4tDY1ic7xui7YWlmqDLCEEIp-wIhDID5</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2617018549</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Local Minima and Factor Rotations in Exploratory Factor Analysis</title><source>APA PsycARTICLES</source><creator>Nguyen, Hoang V. ; Waller, Niels G.</creator><contributor>Steinley, Douglas</contributor><creatorcontrib>Nguyen, Hoang V. ; Waller, Niels G. ; Steinley, Douglas</creatorcontrib><description>In exploratory factor analysis, factor rotation algorithms can converge to local solutions (i.e., local minima) when they are initiated from different starting points. To better understand this problem, we performed three studies that investigated the prevalence and correlates of local solutions with five factor rotation algorithms: varimax, oblimin, entropy, and geomin (orthogonal and oblique). In total, we simulated 16,000 data sets and performed more than 57 million factor rotations to examine the influence of (a) factor loading size, (b) number of factor indicators, (c) factor cross loadings, (d) factor correlation size, (e) factor loading standardization, (f) sample size, and (g) model approximation error on the frequency of local solutions in factor rotation. We also examined local solutions in an exploratory factor analysis of an open source data set that included 54 personality items. Across three studies, all five algorithms converged to local solutions under some conditions with geomin (orthogonal and oblique) producing the highest number of local solutions. Follow-up analyses showed that, when factor rotations produced multiple solutions, the factor pattern with the maximum hyperplane count (rather than the lowest complexity value) was typically closest in mean squared error to the population factor pattern. Translational Abstract In exploratory factor analysis, factor rotation algorithms can converge to local solutions (i.e., local minima) when they are initiated from different starting points. To better understand this problem, we performed three studies that investigated the prevalence and correlates of local solutions with five factor rotation algorithms: varimax, oblimin, entropy, and geomin (orthogonal and oblique). In total, we simulated 16,000 data sets and performed more than 57 million factor rotations to examine the influence of (a) factor loading size, (b) number of factor indicators, (c) factor cross loadings, (d) factor correlation size, (e) factor loading standardization, (f) sample size, and (g) model approximation error on the frequency of local solutions in factor rotation. We also examined local solutions in an exploratory factor analysis of an open source data set that included 54 personality items. Across three studies, all five algorithms converged to local solutions under some conditions with geomin (orthogonal and oblique) producing the highest number of local solutions. Follow-up analyses showed that, when factor rotations produced multiple solutions, the factor pattern with the maximum hyperplane count (rather than the lowest complexity value) was typically closest in mean squared error to the population factor pattern.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1082-989X</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1939-1463</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1037/met0000467</identifier><identifier>PMID: 34990187</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>United States: American Psychological Association</publisher><subject>Algorithms ; Error Analysis ; Exploratory Factor Analysis ; Factor Analysis ; Human ; Sample Size ; Statistical Rotation ; Varimax Rotation</subject><ispartof>Psychological methods, 2023-10, Vol.28 (5), p.1122-1141</ispartof><rights>2022 American Psychological Association</rights><rights>2021, American Psychological Association</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-a352t-57755f5754cc002aa7af47424fbda8e479ad77df1dde7678759c51787d0196d93</citedby></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,27903,27904</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34990187$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><contributor>Steinley, Douglas</contributor><creatorcontrib>Nguyen, Hoang V.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Waller, Niels G.</creatorcontrib><title>Local Minima and Factor Rotations in Exploratory Factor Analysis</title><title>Psychological methods</title><addtitle>Psychol Methods</addtitle><description>In exploratory factor analysis, factor rotation algorithms can converge to local solutions (i.e., local minima) when they are initiated from different starting points. To better understand this problem, we performed three studies that investigated the prevalence and correlates of local solutions with five factor rotation algorithms: varimax, oblimin, entropy, and geomin (orthogonal and oblique). In total, we simulated 16,000 data sets and performed more than 57 million factor rotations to examine the influence of (a) factor loading size, (b) number of factor indicators, (c) factor cross loadings, (d) factor correlation size, (e) factor loading standardization, (f) sample size, and (g) model approximation error on the frequency of local solutions in factor rotation. We also examined local solutions in an exploratory factor analysis of an open source data set that included 54 personality items. Across three studies, all five algorithms converged to local solutions under some conditions with geomin (orthogonal and oblique) producing the highest number of local solutions. Follow-up analyses showed that, when factor rotations produced multiple solutions, the factor pattern with the maximum hyperplane count (rather than the lowest complexity value) was typically closest in mean squared error to the population factor pattern. Translational Abstract In exploratory factor analysis, factor rotation algorithms can converge to local solutions (i.e., local minima) when they are initiated from different starting points. To better understand this problem, we performed three studies that investigated the prevalence and correlates of local solutions with five factor rotation algorithms: varimax, oblimin, entropy, and geomin (orthogonal and oblique). In total, we simulated 16,000 data sets and performed more than 57 million factor rotations to examine the influence of (a) factor loading size, (b) number of factor indicators, (c) factor cross loadings, (d) factor correlation size, (e) factor loading standardization, (f) sample size, and (g) model approximation error on the frequency of local solutions in factor rotation. We also examined local solutions in an exploratory factor analysis of an open source data set that included 54 personality items. Across three studies, all five algorithms converged to local solutions under some conditions with geomin (orthogonal and oblique) producing the highest number of local solutions. Follow-up analyses showed that, when factor rotations produced multiple solutions, the factor pattern with the maximum hyperplane count (rather than the lowest complexity value) was typically closest in mean squared error to the population factor pattern.</description><subject>Algorithms</subject><subject>Error Analysis</subject><subject>Exploratory Factor Analysis</subject><subject>Factor Analysis</subject><subject>Human</subject><subject>Sample Size</subject><subject>Statistical Rotation</subject><subject>Varimax Rotation</subject><issn>1082-989X</issn><issn>1939-1463</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2023</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNpdkFtLxDAQhYMo3l_8AVLwRcRqrk3y5iLrBVYEUfAtjEkKlW5Tkxbcf2_WXRWclzPMfBxmDkJHBF8QzOTl3A84F6_kBtolmumS8Ipt5h4rWmqlX3fQXkrvGBPOFN9GO4xrjYmSu-hqFiy0xUPTNXMooHPFDdghxOIpDDA0oUtF0xXTz74NEfJ88bOfdNAuUpMO0FYNbfKHa91HLzfT5-u7cvZ4e389mZXABB1KIaUQtZCCW4sxBZBQc8kpr98cKM-lBielq4lzXlZSSaGtIFkdJrpymu2j05VvH8PH6NNg5k2yvm2h82FMhlZEUSZVxTJ68g99D2PM935TMj8u-NLwbEXZGFKKvjZ9zBnEhSHYLHM1f7lm-HhtOb7NvftFf4LMwPkKgB5MnxYW4tDY1ic7xui7YWlmqDLCEEIp-wIhDID5</recordid><startdate>20231001</startdate><enddate>20231001</enddate><creator>Nguyen, Hoang V.</creator><creator>Waller, Niels G.</creator><general>American Psychological Association</general><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7RZ</scope><scope>PSYQQ</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20231001</creationdate><title>Local Minima and Factor Rotations in Exploratory Factor Analysis</title><author>Nguyen, Hoang V. ; Waller, Niels G.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-a352t-57755f5754cc002aa7af47424fbda8e479ad77df1dde7678759c51787d0196d93</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2023</creationdate><topic>Algorithms</topic><topic>Error Analysis</topic><topic>Exploratory Factor Analysis</topic><topic>Factor Analysis</topic><topic>Human</topic><topic>Sample Size</topic><topic>Statistical Rotation</topic><topic>Varimax Rotation</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Nguyen, Hoang V.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Waller, Niels G.</creatorcontrib><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>APA PsycArticles®</collection><collection>ProQuest One Psychology</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Psychological methods</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Nguyen, Hoang V.</au><au>Waller, Niels G.</au><au>Steinley, Douglas</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Local Minima and Factor Rotations in Exploratory Factor Analysis</atitle><jtitle>Psychological methods</jtitle><addtitle>Psychol Methods</addtitle><date>2023-10-01</date><risdate>2023</risdate><volume>28</volume><issue>5</issue><spage>1122</spage><epage>1141</epage><pages>1122-1141</pages><issn>1082-989X</issn><eissn>1939-1463</eissn><abstract>In exploratory factor analysis, factor rotation algorithms can converge to local solutions (i.e., local minima) when they are initiated from different starting points. To better understand this problem, we performed three studies that investigated the prevalence and correlates of local solutions with five factor rotation algorithms: varimax, oblimin, entropy, and geomin (orthogonal and oblique). In total, we simulated 16,000 data sets and performed more than 57 million factor rotations to examine the influence of (a) factor loading size, (b) number of factor indicators, (c) factor cross loadings, (d) factor correlation size, (e) factor loading standardization, (f) sample size, and (g) model approximation error on the frequency of local solutions in factor rotation. We also examined local solutions in an exploratory factor analysis of an open source data set that included 54 personality items. Across three studies, all five algorithms converged to local solutions under some conditions with geomin (orthogonal and oblique) producing the highest number of local solutions. Follow-up analyses showed that, when factor rotations produced multiple solutions, the factor pattern with the maximum hyperplane count (rather than the lowest complexity value) was typically closest in mean squared error to the population factor pattern. Translational Abstract In exploratory factor analysis, factor rotation algorithms can converge to local solutions (i.e., local minima) when they are initiated from different starting points. To better understand this problem, we performed three studies that investigated the prevalence and correlates of local solutions with five factor rotation algorithms: varimax, oblimin, entropy, and geomin (orthogonal and oblique). In total, we simulated 16,000 data sets and performed more than 57 million factor rotations to examine the influence of (a) factor loading size, (b) number of factor indicators, (c) factor cross loadings, (d) factor correlation size, (e) factor loading standardization, (f) sample size, and (g) model approximation error on the frequency of local solutions in factor rotation. We also examined local solutions in an exploratory factor analysis of an open source data set that included 54 personality items. Across three studies, all five algorithms converged to local solutions under some conditions with geomin (orthogonal and oblique) producing the highest number of local solutions. Follow-up analyses showed that, when factor rotations produced multiple solutions, the factor pattern with the maximum hyperplane count (rather than the lowest complexity value) was typically closest in mean squared error to the population factor pattern.</abstract><cop>United States</cop><pub>American Psychological Association</pub><pmid>34990187</pmid><doi>10.1037/met0000467</doi><tpages>20</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 1082-989X
ispartof Psychological methods, 2023-10, Vol.28 (5), p.1122-1141
issn 1082-989X
1939-1463
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2618237863
source APA PsycARTICLES
subjects Algorithms
Error Analysis
Exploratory Factor Analysis
Factor Analysis
Human
Sample Size
Statistical Rotation
Varimax Rotation
title Local Minima and Factor Rotations in Exploratory Factor Analysis
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-27T06%3A04%3A03IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Local%20Minima%20and%20Factor%20Rotations%20in%20Exploratory%20Factor%20Analysis&rft.jtitle=Psychological%20methods&rft.au=Nguyen,%20Hoang%20V.&rft.date=2023-10-01&rft.volume=28&rft.issue=5&rft.spage=1122&rft.epage=1141&rft.pages=1122-1141&rft.issn=1082-989X&rft.eissn=1939-1463&rft_id=info:doi/10.1037/met0000467&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2617018549%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2617018549&rft_id=info:pmid/34990187&rfr_iscdi=true