Tailored Management with Highly-Selective Diversion for Low Colorectal Anastomosis: Biochemical Postoperative Follow-Up and Long-Term Results from a Single-Institution Cohort

Background Defunctioning stoma (DS) can decrease the rate of symptomatic anastomotic leakage (AL). Since 2010, we have used tailored, highly selective DS management for low colorectal anastomosis (LCRA) . Methods In total, 433 rectal cancer patients underwent the same standardized procedure. Non-sto...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Annals of surgical oncology 2022-04, Vol.29 (4), p.2514-2524
Hauptverfasser: Rouanet, Philippe, Selvy, Marie, Jarlier, Marta, Bugnon, Caroline, Carrier, Guillaume, Mourregot, Anne, Colombo, Pierre-Emmanuel, Taoum, Christophe
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 2524
container_issue 4
container_start_page 2514
container_title Annals of surgical oncology
container_volume 29
creator Rouanet, Philippe
Selvy, Marie
Jarlier, Marta
Bugnon, Caroline
Carrier, Guillaume
Mourregot, Anne
Colombo, Pierre-Emmanuel
Taoum, Christophe
description Background Defunctioning stoma (DS) can decrease the rate of symptomatic anastomotic leakage (AL). Since 2010, we have used tailored, highly selective DS management for low colorectal anastomosis (LCRA) . Methods In total, 433 rectal cancer patients underwent the same standardized procedure. Non-stoma (NS) management was used in patients with no surgical difficulties as well as good colonic preparation and quality of anastomoses. In all other cases, DS was used. C-reactive protein was measured during postoperative follow-up. Imbalance in the initial population was adjusted using propensity-score matching according to sex, age, body mass index, tumor location, and American Society of Anesthesiologists score. Rate of AL within 30 days, 5-year overall survival, local relapse-free survival, and disease-free survival were recorded. Results Anastomosis was mostly ultra-low and was performed equally by laparoscopy or robotic surgery. The overall rate of AL was 13.4%, with no significant differences between groups (DS, 12.2%; NS, 14.6%; p  = 0.575). Operative time, blood loss, and hospital stay were significantly lower for NS patients. The rate of secondary stoma was 11.4% overall. Pathological results were similar, with a 98% R0 resection rate. With a median follow-up of 5.5 years for the NS and DS groups, the overall survival was 84.9% and 73.4%, respectively ( p  = 0.064), disease-free survival was 67.0% and 55.8%, respectively ( p  = 0.095), and local relapse-free survival was 95.2% and 88.7%, respectively ( p  = 0.084). The long-term, stoma-free rate was 89.1% overall. Conclusions Tailoring DS for LCRA seems safe and could provide potential benefits in postoperative morbidity with the same long-term oncological results in NS patients. Prospective, multicentric studies should validate this approach.
doi_str_mv 10.1245/s10434-021-11197-2
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2618234705</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2618234705</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c375t-b48e4ba686cef7a852c333f299ff011616e55c3f2d61194572a10f0ae780db1b3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kc1u1DAUhSMEoj_wAiyQJTZsDP5NYnZlaGmlQSA6XUeOczPjyrGntsOoL8Uz4ukUkFiwsa1zv3vulU9VvaLkHWVCvk-UCC4wYRRTSlWD2ZPqmMoiibqlT8ub1C1WrJZH1UlKt4TQhhP5vDriQinRtuq4-rnS1oUIA_qivV7DBD6jnc0bdGnXG3ePr8GByfYHoE_liMkGj8YQ0TLs0CLsW03WDp15nXKYQrLpA_pog9nAZE0pfAtF30LUDx4XwbmwwzdbpP1QPPwaryBO6Duk2eWExhgmpNG19WsH-MqnbPOc9zMXYRNiflE9G7VL8PLxPq1uLs5Xi0u8_Pr5anG2xIY3MuNetCB6Xbe1gbHRrWSGcz4ypcaRUFrTGqQ0RRjq8nFCNkxTMhINTUuGnvb8tHp78N3GcDdDyt1kkwHntIcwp47VtGVcNEQW9M0_6G2Yoy_bFUoQKZVSrFDsQJkYUoowdttoJx3vO0q6fZrdIc2upNk9pNntm14_Ws_9BMOflt_xFYAfgFRKfg3x7-z_2P4CYuytPQ</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2640559992</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Tailored Management with Highly-Selective Diversion for Low Colorectal Anastomosis: Biochemical Postoperative Follow-Up and Long-Term Results from a Single-Institution Cohort</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>SpringerNature Journals</source><creator>Rouanet, Philippe ; Selvy, Marie ; Jarlier, Marta ; Bugnon, Caroline ; Carrier, Guillaume ; Mourregot, Anne ; Colombo, Pierre-Emmanuel ; Taoum, Christophe</creator><creatorcontrib>Rouanet, Philippe ; Selvy, Marie ; Jarlier, Marta ; Bugnon, Caroline ; Carrier, Guillaume ; Mourregot, Anne ; Colombo, Pierre-Emmanuel ; Taoum, Christophe</creatorcontrib><description>Background Defunctioning stoma (DS) can decrease the rate of symptomatic anastomotic leakage (AL). Since 2010, we have used tailored, highly selective DS management for low colorectal anastomosis (LCRA) . Methods In total, 433 rectal cancer patients underwent the same standardized procedure. Non-stoma (NS) management was used in patients with no surgical difficulties as well as good colonic preparation and quality of anastomoses. In all other cases, DS was used. C-reactive protein was measured during postoperative follow-up. Imbalance in the initial population was adjusted using propensity-score matching according to sex, age, body mass index, tumor location, and American Society of Anesthesiologists score. Rate of AL within 30 days, 5-year overall survival, local relapse-free survival, and disease-free survival were recorded. Results Anastomosis was mostly ultra-low and was performed equally by laparoscopy or robotic surgery. The overall rate of AL was 13.4%, with no significant differences between groups (DS, 12.2%; NS, 14.6%; p  = 0.575). Operative time, blood loss, and hospital stay were significantly lower for NS patients. The rate of secondary stoma was 11.4% overall. Pathological results were similar, with a 98% R0 resection rate. With a median follow-up of 5.5 years for the NS and DS groups, the overall survival was 84.9% and 73.4%, respectively ( p  = 0.064), disease-free survival was 67.0% and 55.8%, respectively ( p  = 0.095), and local relapse-free survival was 95.2% and 88.7%, respectively ( p  = 0.084). The long-term, stoma-free rate was 89.1% overall. Conclusions Tailoring DS for LCRA seems safe and could provide potential benefits in postoperative morbidity with the same long-term oncological results in NS patients. Prospective, multicentric studies should validate this approach.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1068-9265</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1534-4681</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1245/s10434-021-11197-2</identifier><identifier>PMID: 34994889</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Cham: Springer International Publishing</publisher><subject>Anastomosis ; Anastomosis, Surgical - adverse effects ; Anastomosis, Surgical - methods ; Anastomotic leak ; Anastomotic Leak - epidemiology ; Anastomotic Leak - etiology ; Body mass index ; C-reactive protein ; Colorectal Cancer ; Follow-Up Studies ; Humans ; Laparoscopy ; Medicine ; Medicine &amp; Public Health ; Morbidity ; Oncology ; Ostomy ; Patients ; Postoperative period ; Prospective Studies ; Rectal Neoplasms - pathology ; Rectum - pathology ; Rectum - surgery ; Retrospective Studies ; Robotic surgery ; Surgery ; Surgical Oncology ; Survival ; Tumors</subject><ispartof>Annals of surgical oncology, 2022-04, Vol.29 (4), p.2514-2524</ispartof><rights>Society of Surgical Oncology 2021</rights><rights>2021. Society of Surgical Oncology.</rights><rights>Society of Surgical Oncology 2021.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c375t-b48e4ba686cef7a852c333f299ff011616e55c3f2d61194572a10f0ae780db1b3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c375t-b48e4ba686cef7a852c333f299ff011616e55c3f2d61194572a10f0ae780db1b3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1245/s10434-021-11197-2$$EPDF$$P50$$Gspringer$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://link.springer.com/10.1245/s10434-021-11197-2$$EHTML$$P50$$Gspringer$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>315,782,786,27933,27934,41497,42566,51328</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34994889$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Rouanet, Philippe</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Selvy, Marie</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Jarlier, Marta</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bugnon, Caroline</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Carrier, Guillaume</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mourregot, Anne</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Colombo, Pierre-Emmanuel</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Taoum, Christophe</creatorcontrib><title>Tailored Management with Highly-Selective Diversion for Low Colorectal Anastomosis: Biochemical Postoperative Follow-Up and Long-Term Results from a Single-Institution Cohort</title><title>Annals of surgical oncology</title><addtitle>Ann Surg Oncol</addtitle><addtitle>Ann Surg Oncol</addtitle><description>Background Defunctioning stoma (DS) can decrease the rate of symptomatic anastomotic leakage (AL). Since 2010, we have used tailored, highly selective DS management for low colorectal anastomosis (LCRA) . Methods In total, 433 rectal cancer patients underwent the same standardized procedure. Non-stoma (NS) management was used in patients with no surgical difficulties as well as good colonic preparation and quality of anastomoses. In all other cases, DS was used. C-reactive protein was measured during postoperative follow-up. Imbalance in the initial population was adjusted using propensity-score matching according to sex, age, body mass index, tumor location, and American Society of Anesthesiologists score. Rate of AL within 30 days, 5-year overall survival, local relapse-free survival, and disease-free survival were recorded. Results Anastomosis was mostly ultra-low and was performed equally by laparoscopy or robotic surgery. The overall rate of AL was 13.4%, with no significant differences between groups (DS, 12.2%; NS, 14.6%; p  = 0.575). Operative time, blood loss, and hospital stay were significantly lower for NS patients. The rate of secondary stoma was 11.4% overall. Pathological results were similar, with a 98% R0 resection rate. With a median follow-up of 5.5 years for the NS and DS groups, the overall survival was 84.9% and 73.4%, respectively ( p  = 0.064), disease-free survival was 67.0% and 55.8%, respectively ( p  = 0.095), and local relapse-free survival was 95.2% and 88.7%, respectively ( p  = 0.084). The long-term, stoma-free rate was 89.1% overall. Conclusions Tailoring DS for LCRA seems safe and could provide potential benefits in postoperative morbidity with the same long-term oncological results in NS patients. Prospective, multicentric studies should validate this approach.</description><subject>Anastomosis</subject><subject>Anastomosis, Surgical - adverse effects</subject><subject>Anastomosis, Surgical - methods</subject><subject>Anastomotic leak</subject><subject>Anastomotic Leak - epidemiology</subject><subject>Anastomotic Leak - etiology</subject><subject>Body mass index</subject><subject>C-reactive protein</subject><subject>Colorectal Cancer</subject><subject>Follow-Up Studies</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Laparoscopy</subject><subject>Medicine</subject><subject>Medicine &amp; Public Health</subject><subject>Morbidity</subject><subject>Oncology</subject><subject>Ostomy</subject><subject>Patients</subject><subject>Postoperative period</subject><subject>Prospective Studies</subject><subject>Rectal Neoplasms - pathology</subject><subject>Rectum - pathology</subject><subject>Rectum - surgery</subject><subject>Retrospective Studies</subject><subject>Robotic surgery</subject><subject>Surgery</subject><subject>Surgical Oncology</subject><subject>Survival</subject><subject>Tumors</subject><issn>1068-9265</issn><issn>1534-4681</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2022</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><sourceid>ABUWG</sourceid><sourceid>AFKRA</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>CCPQU</sourceid><recordid>eNp9kc1u1DAUhSMEoj_wAiyQJTZsDP5NYnZlaGmlQSA6XUeOczPjyrGntsOoL8Uz4ukUkFiwsa1zv3vulU9VvaLkHWVCvk-UCC4wYRRTSlWD2ZPqmMoiibqlT8ub1C1WrJZH1UlKt4TQhhP5vDriQinRtuq4-rnS1oUIA_qivV7DBD6jnc0bdGnXG3ePr8GByfYHoE_liMkGj8YQ0TLs0CLsW03WDp15nXKYQrLpA_pog9nAZE0pfAtF30LUDx4XwbmwwzdbpP1QPPwaryBO6Duk2eWExhgmpNG19WsH-MqnbPOc9zMXYRNiflE9G7VL8PLxPq1uLs5Xi0u8_Pr5anG2xIY3MuNetCB6Xbe1gbHRrWSGcz4ypcaRUFrTGqQ0RRjq8nFCNkxTMhINTUuGnvb8tHp78N3GcDdDyt1kkwHntIcwp47VtGVcNEQW9M0_6G2Yoy_bFUoQKZVSrFDsQJkYUoowdttoJx3vO0q6fZrdIc2upNk9pNntm14_Ws_9BMOflt_xFYAfgFRKfg3x7-z_2P4CYuytPQ</recordid><startdate>20220401</startdate><enddate>20220401</enddate><creator>Rouanet, Philippe</creator><creator>Selvy, Marie</creator><creator>Jarlier, Marta</creator><creator>Bugnon, Caroline</creator><creator>Carrier, Guillaume</creator><creator>Mourregot, Anne</creator><creator>Colombo, Pierre-Emmanuel</creator><creator>Taoum, Christophe</creator><general>Springer International Publishing</general><general>Springer Nature B.V</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7TO</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88E</scope><scope>8AO</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>H94</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>M1P</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20220401</creationdate><title>Tailored Management with Highly-Selective Diversion for Low Colorectal Anastomosis: Biochemical Postoperative Follow-Up and Long-Term Results from a Single-Institution Cohort</title><author>Rouanet, Philippe ; Selvy, Marie ; Jarlier, Marta ; Bugnon, Caroline ; Carrier, Guillaume ; Mourregot, Anne ; Colombo, Pierre-Emmanuel ; Taoum, Christophe</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c375t-b48e4ba686cef7a852c333f299ff011616e55c3f2d61194572a10f0ae780db1b3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2022</creationdate><topic>Anastomosis</topic><topic>Anastomosis, Surgical - adverse effects</topic><topic>Anastomosis, Surgical - methods</topic><topic>Anastomotic leak</topic><topic>Anastomotic Leak - epidemiology</topic><topic>Anastomotic Leak - etiology</topic><topic>Body mass index</topic><topic>C-reactive protein</topic><topic>Colorectal Cancer</topic><topic>Follow-Up Studies</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Laparoscopy</topic><topic>Medicine</topic><topic>Medicine &amp; Public Health</topic><topic>Morbidity</topic><topic>Oncology</topic><topic>Ostomy</topic><topic>Patients</topic><topic>Postoperative period</topic><topic>Prospective Studies</topic><topic>Rectal Neoplasms - pathology</topic><topic>Rectum - pathology</topic><topic>Rectum - surgery</topic><topic>Retrospective Studies</topic><topic>Robotic surgery</topic><topic>Surgery</topic><topic>Surgical Oncology</topic><topic>Survival</topic><topic>Tumors</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Rouanet, Philippe</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Selvy, Marie</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Jarlier, Marta</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bugnon, Caroline</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Carrier, Guillaume</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mourregot, Anne</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Colombo, Pierre-Emmanuel</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Taoum, Christophe</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Oncogenes and Growth Factors Abstracts</collection><collection>Health &amp; Medical Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Medical Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Pharma Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>AIDS and Cancer Research Abstracts</collection><collection>ProQuest Health &amp; Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Health &amp; Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Medical Database</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Annals of surgical oncology</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Rouanet, Philippe</au><au>Selvy, Marie</au><au>Jarlier, Marta</au><au>Bugnon, Caroline</au><au>Carrier, Guillaume</au><au>Mourregot, Anne</au><au>Colombo, Pierre-Emmanuel</au><au>Taoum, Christophe</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Tailored Management with Highly-Selective Diversion for Low Colorectal Anastomosis: Biochemical Postoperative Follow-Up and Long-Term Results from a Single-Institution Cohort</atitle><jtitle>Annals of surgical oncology</jtitle><stitle>Ann Surg Oncol</stitle><addtitle>Ann Surg Oncol</addtitle><date>2022-04-01</date><risdate>2022</risdate><volume>29</volume><issue>4</issue><spage>2514</spage><epage>2524</epage><pages>2514-2524</pages><issn>1068-9265</issn><eissn>1534-4681</eissn><abstract>Background Defunctioning stoma (DS) can decrease the rate of symptomatic anastomotic leakage (AL). Since 2010, we have used tailored, highly selective DS management for low colorectal anastomosis (LCRA) . Methods In total, 433 rectal cancer patients underwent the same standardized procedure. Non-stoma (NS) management was used in patients with no surgical difficulties as well as good colonic preparation and quality of anastomoses. In all other cases, DS was used. C-reactive protein was measured during postoperative follow-up. Imbalance in the initial population was adjusted using propensity-score matching according to sex, age, body mass index, tumor location, and American Society of Anesthesiologists score. Rate of AL within 30 days, 5-year overall survival, local relapse-free survival, and disease-free survival were recorded. Results Anastomosis was mostly ultra-low and was performed equally by laparoscopy or robotic surgery. The overall rate of AL was 13.4%, with no significant differences between groups (DS, 12.2%; NS, 14.6%; p  = 0.575). Operative time, blood loss, and hospital stay were significantly lower for NS patients. The rate of secondary stoma was 11.4% overall. Pathological results were similar, with a 98% R0 resection rate. With a median follow-up of 5.5 years for the NS and DS groups, the overall survival was 84.9% and 73.4%, respectively ( p  = 0.064), disease-free survival was 67.0% and 55.8%, respectively ( p  = 0.095), and local relapse-free survival was 95.2% and 88.7%, respectively ( p  = 0.084). The long-term, stoma-free rate was 89.1% overall. Conclusions Tailoring DS for LCRA seems safe and could provide potential benefits in postoperative morbidity with the same long-term oncological results in NS patients. Prospective, multicentric studies should validate this approach.</abstract><cop>Cham</cop><pub>Springer International Publishing</pub><pmid>34994889</pmid><doi>10.1245/s10434-021-11197-2</doi><tpages>11</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 1068-9265
ispartof Annals of surgical oncology, 2022-04, Vol.29 (4), p.2514-2524
issn 1068-9265
1534-4681
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2618234705
source MEDLINE; SpringerNature Journals
subjects Anastomosis
Anastomosis, Surgical - adverse effects
Anastomosis, Surgical - methods
Anastomotic leak
Anastomotic Leak - epidemiology
Anastomotic Leak - etiology
Body mass index
C-reactive protein
Colorectal Cancer
Follow-Up Studies
Humans
Laparoscopy
Medicine
Medicine & Public Health
Morbidity
Oncology
Ostomy
Patients
Postoperative period
Prospective Studies
Rectal Neoplasms - pathology
Rectum - pathology
Rectum - surgery
Retrospective Studies
Robotic surgery
Surgery
Surgical Oncology
Survival
Tumors
title Tailored Management with Highly-Selective Diversion for Low Colorectal Anastomosis: Biochemical Postoperative Follow-Up and Long-Term Results from a Single-Institution Cohort
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-11-29T20%3A47%3A34IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Tailored%20Management%20with%20Highly-Selective%20Diversion%20for%20Low%20Colorectal%20Anastomosis:%20Biochemical%20Postoperative%20Follow-Up%20and%20Long-Term%20Results%20from%20a%20Single-Institution%20Cohort&rft.jtitle=Annals%20of%20surgical%20oncology&rft.au=Rouanet,%20Philippe&rft.date=2022-04-01&rft.volume=29&rft.issue=4&rft.spage=2514&rft.epage=2524&rft.pages=2514-2524&rft.issn=1068-9265&rft.eissn=1534-4681&rft_id=info:doi/10.1245/s10434-021-11197-2&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2618234705%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2640559992&rft_id=info:pmid/34994889&rfr_iscdi=true