Tailored Management with Highly-Selective Diversion for Low Colorectal Anastomosis: Biochemical Postoperative Follow-Up and Long-Term Results from a Single-Institution Cohort
Background Defunctioning stoma (DS) can decrease the rate of symptomatic anastomotic leakage (AL). Since 2010, we have used tailored, highly selective DS management for low colorectal anastomosis (LCRA) . Methods In total, 433 rectal cancer patients underwent the same standardized procedure. Non-sto...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Annals of surgical oncology 2022-04, Vol.29 (4), p.2514-2524 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 2524 |
---|---|
container_issue | 4 |
container_start_page | 2514 |
container_title | Annals of surgical oncology |
container_volume | 29 |
creator | Rouanet, Philippe Selvy, Marie Jarlier, Marta Bugnon, Caroline Carrier, Guillaume Mourregot, Anne Colombo, Pierre-Emmanuel Taoum, Christophe |
description | Background
Defunctioning stoma (DS) can decrease the rate of symptomatic anastomotic leakage (AL). Since 2010, we have used tailored, highly selective DS management for low colorectal anastomosis (LCRA)
.
Methods
In total, 433 rectal cancer patients underwent the same standardized procedure. Non-stoma (NS) management was used in patients with no surgical difficulties as well as good colonic preparation and quality of anastomoses. In all other cases, DS was used. C-reactive protein was measured during postoperative follow-up. Imbalance in the initial population was adjusted using propensity-score matching according to sex, age, body mass index, tumor location, and American Society of Anesthesiologists score. Rate of AL within 30 days, 5-year overall survival, local relapse-free survival, and disease-free survival were recorded.
Results
Anastomosis was mostly ultra-low and was performed equally by laparoscopy or robotic surgery. The overall rate of AL was 13.4%, with no significant differences between groups (DS, 12.2%; NS, 14.6%;
p
= 0.575). Operative time, blood loss, and hospital stay were significantly lower for NS patients. The rate of secondary stoma was 11.4% overall. Pathological results were similar, with a 98% R0 resection rate. With a median follow-up of 5.5 years for the NS and DS groups, the overall survival was 84.9% and 73.4%, respectively (
p
= 0.064), disease-free survival was 67.0% and 55.8%, respectively (
p
= 0.095), and local relapse-free survival was 95.2% and 88.7%, respectively (
p
= 0.084). The long-term, stoma-free rate was 89.1% overall.
Conclusions
Tailoring DS for LCRA seems safe and could provide potential benefits in postoperative morbidity with the same long-term oncological results in NS patients. Prospective, multicentric studies should validate this approach. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1245/s10434-021-11197-2 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2618234705</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2618234705</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c375t-b48e4ba686cef7a852c333f299ff011616e55c3f2d61194572a10f0ae780db1b3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kc1u1DAUhSMEoj_wAiyQJTZsDP5NYnZlaGmlQSA6XUeOczPjyrGntsOoL8Uz4ukUkFiwsa1zv3vulU9VvaLkHWVCvk-UCC4wYRRTSlWD2ZPqmMoiibqlT8ub1C1WrJZH1UlKt4TQhhP5vDriQinRtuq4-rnS1oUIA_qivV7DBD6jnc0bdGnXG3ePr8GByfYHoE_liMkGj8YQ0TLs0CLsW03WDp15nXKYQrLpA_pog9nAZE0pfAtF30LUDx4XwbmwwzdbpP1QPPwaryBO6Duk2eWExhgmpNG19WsH-MqnbPOc9zMXYRNiflE9G7VL8PLxPq1uLs5Xi0u8_Pr5anG2xIY3MuNetCB6Xbe1gbHRrWSGcz4ypcaRUFrTGqQ0RRjq8nFCNkxTMhINTUuGnvb8tHp78N3GcDdDyt1kkwHntIcwp47VtGVcNEQW9M0_6G2Yoy_bFUoQKZVSrFDsQJkYUoowdttoJx3vO0q6fZrdIc2upNk9pNntm14_Ws_9BMOflt_xFYAfgFRKfg3x7-z_2P4CYuytPQ</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2640559992</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Tailored Management with Highly-Selective Diversion for Low Colorectal Anastomosis: Biochemical Postoperative Follow-Up and Long-Term Results from a Single-Institution Cohort</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>SpringerNature Journals</source><creator>Rouanet, Philippe ; Selvy, Marie ; Jarlier, Marta ; Bugnon, Caroline ; Carrier, Guillaume ; Mourregot, Anne ; Colombo, Pierre-Emmanuel ; Taoum, Christophe</creator><creatorcontrib>Rouanet, Philippe ; Selvy, Marie ; Jarlier, Marta ; Bugnon, Caroline ; Carrier, Guillaume ; Mourregot, Anne ; Colombo, Pierre-Emmanuel ; Taoum, Christophe</creatorcontrib><description>Background
Defunctioning stoma (DS) can decrease the rate of symptomatic anastomotic leakage (AL). Since 2010, we have used tailored, highly selective DS management for low colorectal anastomosis (LCRA)
.
Methods
In total, 433 rectal cancer patients underwent the same standardized procedure. Non-stoma (NS) management was used in patients with no surgical difficulties as well as good colonic preparation and quality of anastomoses. In all other cases, DS was used. C-reactive protein was measured during postoperative follow-up. Imbalance in the initial population was adjusted using propensity-score matching according to sex, age, body mass index, tumor location, and American Society of Anesthesiologists score. Rate of AL within 30 days, 5-year overall survival, local relapse-free survival, and disease-free survival were recorded.
Results
Anastomosis was mostly ultra-low and was performed equally by laparoscopy or robotic surgery. The overall rate of AL was 13.4%, with no significant differences between groups (DS, 12.2%; NS, 14.6%;
p
= 0.575). Operative time, blood loss, and hospital stay were significantly lower for NS patients. The rate of secondary stoma was 11.4% overall. Pathological results were similar, with a 98% R0 resection rate. With a median follow-up of 5.5 years for the NS and DS groups, the overall survival was 84.9% and 73.4%, respectively (
p
= 0.064), disease-free survival was 67.0% and 55.8%, respectively (
p
= 0.095), and local relapse-free survival was 95.2% and 88.7%, respectively (
p
= 0.084). The long-term, stoma-free rate was 89.1% overall.
Conclusions
Tailoring DS for LCRA seems safe and could provide potential benefits in postoperative morbidity with the same long-term oncological results in NS patients. Prospective, multicentric studies should validate this approach.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1068-9265</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1534-4681</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1245/s10434-021-11197-2</identifier><identifier>PMID: 34994889</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Cham: Springer International Publishing</publisher><subject>Anastomosis ; Anastomosis, Surgical - adverse effects ; Anastomosis, Surgical - methods ; Anastomotic leak ; Anastomotic Leak - epidemiology ; Anastomotic Leak - etiology ; Body mass index ; C-reactive protein ; Colorectal Cancer ; Follow-Up Studies ; Humans ; Laparoscopy ; Medicine ; Medicine & Public Health ; Morbidity ; Oncology ; Ostomy ; Patients ; Postoperative period ; Prospective Studies ; Rectal Neoplasms - pathology ; Rectum - pathology ; Rectum - surgery ; Retrospective Studies ; Robotic surgery ; Surgery ; Surgical Oncology ; Survival ; Tumors</subject><ispartof>Annals of surgical oncology, 2022-04, Vol.29 (4), p.2514-2524</ispartof><rights>Society of Surgical Oncology 2021</rights><rights>2021. Society of Surgical Oncology.</rights><rights>Society of Surgical Oncology 2021.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c375t-b48e4ba686cef7a852c333f299ff011616e55c3f2d61194572a10f0ae780db1b3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c375t-b48e4ba686cef7a852c333f299ff011616e55c3f2d61194572a10f0ae780db1b3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1245/s10434-021-11197-2$$EPDF$$P50$$Gspringer$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://link.springer.com/10.1245/s10434-021-11197-2$$EHTML$$P50$$Gspringer$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>315,782,786,27933,27934,41497,42566,51328</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34994889$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Rouanet, Philippe</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Selvy, Marie</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Jarlier, Marta</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bugnon, Caroline</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Carrier, Guillaume</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mourregot, Anne</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Colombo, Pierre-Emmanuel</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Taoum, Christophe</creatorcontrib><title>Tailored Management with Highly-Selective Diversion for Low Colorectal Anastomosis: Biochemical Postoperative Follow-Up and Long-Term Results from a Single-Institution Cohort</title><title>Annals of surgical oncology</title><addtitle>Ann Surg Oncol</addtitle><addtitle>Ann Surg Oncol</addtitle><description>Background
Defunctioning stoma (DS) can decrease the rate of symptomatic anastomotic leakage (AL). Since 2010, we have used tailored, highly selective DS management for low colorectal anastomosis (LCRA)
.
Methods
In total, 433 rectal cancer patients underwent the same standardized procedure. Non-stoma (NS) management was used in patients with no surgical difficulties as well as good colonic preparation and quality of anastomoses. In all other cases, DS was used. C-reactive protein was measured during postoperative follow-up. Imbalance in the initial population was adjusted using propensity-score matching according to sex, age, body mass index, tumor location, and American Society of Anesthesiologists score. Rate of AL within 30 days, 5-year overall survival, local relapse-free survival, and disease-free survival were recorded.
Results
Anastomosis was mostly ultra-low and was performed equally by laparoscopy or robotic surgery. The overall rate of AL was 13.4%, with no significant differences between groups (DS, 12.2%; NS, 14.6%;
p
= 0.575). Operative time, blood loss, and hospital stay were significantly lower for NS patients. The rate of secondary stoma was 11.4% overall. Pathological results were similar, with a 98% R0 resection rate. With a median follow-up of 5.5 years for the NS and DS groups, the overall survival was 84.9% and 73.4%, respectively (
p
= 0.064), disease-free survival was 67.0% and 55.8%, respectively (
p
= 0.095), and local relapse-free survival was 95.2% and 88.7%, respectively (
p
= 0.084). The long-term, stoma-free rate was 89.1% overall.
Conclusions
Tailoring DS for LCRA seems safe and could provide potential benefits in postoperative morbidity with the same long-term oncological results in NS patients. Prospective, multicentric studies should validate this approach.</description><subject>Anastomosis</subject><subject>Anastomosis, Surgical - adverse effects</subject><subject>Anastomosis, Surgical - methods</subject><subject>Anastomotic leak</subject><subject>Anastomotic Leak - epidemiology</subject><subject>Anastomotic Leak - etiology</subject><subject>Body mass index</subject><subject>C-reactive protein</subject><subject>Colorectal Cancer</subject><subject>Follow-Up Studies</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Laparoscopy</subject><subject>Medicine</subject><subject>Medicine & Public Health</subject><subject>Morbidity</subject><subject>Oncology</subject><subject>Ostomy</subject><subject>Patients</subject><subject>Postoperative period</subject><subject>Prospective Studies</subject><subject>Rectal Neoplasms - pathology</subject><subject>Rectum - pathology</subject><subject>Rectum - surgery</subject><subject>Retrospective Studies</subject><subject>Robotic surgery</subject><subject>Surgery</subject><subject>Surgical Oncology</subject><subject>Survival</subject><subject>Tumors</subject><issn>1068-9265</issn><issn>1534-4681</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2022</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><sourceid>ABUWG</sourceid><sourceid>AFKRA</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>CCPQU</sourceid><recordid>eNp9kc1u1DAUhSMEoj_wAiyQJTZsDP5NYnZlaGmlQSA6XUeOczPjyrGntsOoL8Uz4ukUkFiwsa1zv3vulU9VvaLkHWVCvk-UCC4wYRRTSlWD2ZPqmMoiibqlT8ub1C1WrJZH1UlKt4TQhhP5vDriQinRtuq4-rnS1oUIA_qivV7DBD6jnc0bdGnXG3ePr8GByfYHoE_liMkGj8YQ0TLs0CLsW03WDp15nXKYQrLpA_pog9nAZE0pfAtF30LUDx4XwbmwwzdbpP1QPPwaryBO6Duk2eWExhgmpNG19WsH-MqnbPOc9zMXYRNiflE9G7VL8PLxPq1uLs5Xi0u8_Pr5anG2xIY3MuNetCB6Xbe1gbHRrWSGcz4ypcaRUFrTGqQ0RRjq8nFCNkxTMhINTUuGnvb8tHp78N3GcDdDyt1kkwHntIcwp47VtGVcNEQW9M0_6G2Yoy_bFUoQKZVSrFDsQJkYUoowdttoJx3vO0q6fZrdIc2upNk9pNntm14_Ws_9BMOflt_xFYAfgFRKfg3x7-z_2P4CYuytPQ</recordid><startdate>20220401</startdate><enddate>20220401</enddate><creator>Rouanet, Philippe</creator><creator>Selvy, Marie</creator><creator>Jarlier, Marta</creator><creator>Bugnon, Caroline</creator><creator>Carrier, Guillaume</creator><creator>Mourregot, Anne</creator><creator>Colombo, Pierre-Emmanuel</creator><creator>Taoum, Christophe</creator><general>Springer International Publishing</general><general>Springer Nature B.V</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7TO</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88E</scope><scope>8AO</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>H94</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>M1P</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20220401</creationdate><title>Tailored Management with Highly-Selective Diversion for Low Colorectal Anastomosis: Biochemical Postoperative Follow-Up and Long-Term Results from a Single-Institution Cohort</title><author>Rouanet, Philippe ; Selvy, Marie ; Jarlier, Marta ; Bugnon, Caroline ; Carrier, Guillaume ; Mourregot, Anne ; Colombo, Pierre-Emmanuel ; Taoum, Christophe</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c375t-b48e4ba686cef7a852c333f299ff011616e55c3f2d61194572a10f0ae780db1b3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2022</creationdate><topic>Anastomosis</topic><topic>Anastomosis, Surgical - adverse effects</topic><topic>Anastomosis, Surgical - methods</topic><topic>Anastomotic leak</topic><topic>Anastomotic Leak - epidemiology</topic><topic>Anastomotic Leak - etiology</topic><topic>Body mass index</topic><topic>C-reactive protein</topic><topic>Colorectal Cancer</topic><topic>Follow-Up Studies</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Laparoscopy</topic><topic>Medicine</topic><topic>Medicine & Public Health</topic><topic>Morbidity</topic><topic>Oncology</topic><topic>Ostomy</topic><topic>Patients</topic><topic>Postoperative period</topic><topic>Prospective Studies</topic><topic>Rectal Neoplasms - pathology</topic><topic>Rectum - pathology</topic><topic>Rectum - surgery</topic><topic>Retrospective Studies</topic><topic>Robotic surgery</topic><topic>Surgery</topic><topic>Surgical Oncology</topic><topic>Survival</topic><topic>Tumors</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Rouanet, Philippe</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Selvy, Marie</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Jarlier, Marta</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bugnon, Caroline</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Carrier, Guillaume</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mourregot, Anne</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Colombo, Pierre-Emmanuel</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Taoum, Christophe</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Oncogenes and Growth Factors Abstracts</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Medical Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Pharma Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>AIDS and Cancer Research Abstracts</collection><collection>ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Medical Database</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Annals of surgical oncology</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Rouanet, Philippe</au><au>Selvy, Marie</au><au>Jarlier, Marta</au><au>Bugnon, Caroline</au><au>Carrier, Guillaume</au><au>Mourregot, Anne</au><au>Colombo, Pierre-Emmanuel</au><au>Taoum, Christophe</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Tailored Management with Highly-Selective Diversion for Low Colorectal Anastomosis: Biochemical Postoperative Follow-Up and Long-Term Results from a Single-Institution Cohort</atitle><jtitle>Annals of surgical oncology</jtitle><stitle>Ann Surg Oncol</stitle><addtitle>Ann Surg Oncol</addtitle><date>2022-04-01</date><risdate>2022</risdate><volume>29</volume><issue>4</issue><spage>2514</spage><epage>2524</epage><pages>2514-2524</pages><issn>1068-9265</issn><eissn>1534-4681</eissn><abstract>Background
Defunctioning stoma (DS) can decrease the rate of symptomatic anastomotic leakage (AL). Since 2010, we have used tailored, highly selective DS management for low colorectal anastomosis (LCRA)
.
Methods
In total, 433 rectal cancer patients underwent the same standardized procedure. Non-stoma (NS) management was used in patients with no surgical difficulties as well as good colonic preparation and quality of anastomoses. In all other cases, DS was used. C-reactive protein was measured during postoperative follow-up. Imbalance in the initial population was adjusted using propensity-score matching according to sex, age, body mass index, tumor location, and American Society of Anesthesiologists score. Rate of AL within 30 days, 5-year overall survival, local relapse-free survival, and disease-free survival were recorded.
Results
Anastomosis was mostly ultra-low and was performed equally by laparoscopy or robotic surgery. The overall rate of AL was 13.4%, with no significant differences between groups (DS, 12.2%; NS, 14.6%;
p
= 0.575). Operative time, blood loss, and hospital stay were significantly lower for NS patients. The rate of secondary stoma was 11.4% overall. Pathological results were similar, with a 98% R0 resection rate. With a median follow-up of 5.5 years for the NS and DS groups, the overall survival was 84.9% and 73.4%, respectively (
p
= 0.064), disease-free survival was 67.0% and 55.8%, respectively (
p
= 0.095), and local relapse-free survival was 95.2% and 88.7%, respectively (
p
= 0.084). The long-term, stoma-free rate was 89.1% overall.
Conclusions
Tailoring DS for LCRA seems safe and could provide potential benefits in postoperative morbidity with the same long-term oncological results in NS patients. Prospective, multicentric studies should validate this approach.</abstract><cop>Cham</cop><pub>Springer International Publishing</pub><pmid>34994889</pmid><doi>10.1245/s10434-021-11197-2</doi><tpages>11</tpages></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 1068-9265 |
ispartof | Annals of surgical oncology, 2022-04, Vol.29 (4), p.2514-2524 |
issn | 1068-9265 1534-4681 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2618234705 |
source | MEDLINE; SpringerNature Journals |
subjects | Anastomosis Anastomosis, Surgical - adverse effects Anastomosis, Surgical - methods Anastomotic leak Anastomotic Leak - epidemiology Anastomotic Leak - etiology Body mass index C-reactive protein Colorectal Cancer Follow-Up Studies Humans Laparoscopy Medicine Medicine & Public Health Morbidity Oncology Ostomy Patients Postoperative period Prospective Studies Rectal Neoplasms - pathology Rectum - pathology Rectum - surgery Retrospective Studies Robotic surgery Surgery Surgical Oncology Survival Tumors |
title | Tailored Management with Highly-Selective Diversion for Low Colorectal Anastomosis: Biochemical Postoperative Follow-Up and Long-Term Results from a Single-Institution Cohort |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-11-29T20%3A47%3A34IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Tailored%20Management%20with%20Highly-Selective%20Diversion%20for%20Low%20Colorectal%20Anastomosis:%20Biochemical%20Postoperative%20Follow-Up%20and%20Long-Term%20Results%20from%20a%20Single-Institution%20Cohort&rft.jtitle=Annals%20of%20surgical%20oncology&rft.au=Rouanet,%20Philippe&rft.date=2022-04-01&rft.volume=29&rft.issue=4&rft.spage=2514&rft.epage=2524&rft.pages=2514-2524&rft.issn=1068-9265&rft.eissn=1534-4681&rft_id=info:doi/10.1245/s10434-021-11197-2&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2618234705%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2640559992&rft_id=info:pmid/34994889&rfr_iscdi=true |