The predictive validity and outcome of ICD-10 and DSM-5 short-lived psychotic disorders: a review and meta-analysis
The ICD-10 Classification of Mental and Behavioural Disorders introduced the category of ‘acute and transient psychotic disorders’ (ATPDs) encompassing polymorphic, schizophrenic and predominantly delusional subtypes, and the forthcoming ICD-11 revision has restricted it to polymorphic psychotic dis...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | European archives of psychiatry and clinical neuroscience 2022-10, Vol.272 (7), p.1157-1168 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 1168 |
---|---|
container_issue | 7 |
container_start_page | 1157 |
container_title | European archives of psychiatry and clinical neuroscience |
container_volume | 272 |
creator | Castagnini, Augusto Foldager, Leslie Caffo, Ernesto Berrios, German E. |
description | The ICD-10 Classification of Mental and Behavioural Disorders introduced the category of ‘acute and transient psychotic disorders’ (ATPDs) encompassing polymorphic, schizophrenic and predominantly delusional subtypes, and the forthcoming ICD-11 revision has restricted it to polymorphic psychotic disorder, while the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders (DSM-5) listed ‘brief psychotic disorder’ (BPD). To assess the predictive validity and outcome of ATPDs and BPD, relevant papers in English, French and German were searched in PubMed and Web of Science. Where possible meta-analysis of prognostic validators (diagnostic stability, course, outcome and response to treatment) was conducted. Fifty studies published between January 1993 and July 2019 were found. The clinical and functional outcome of ATPDs proved better than in schizophrenia and related disorders, but mortality risk is high, particularly suicide, and treatment trials provide little evidence. Meta-analysis of 25 studies (13,507 cases) revealed that 55% (95% CI 49–62) do not change diagnosis, 25% (95% CI 20–31) converted into schizophrenia and related disorders, and 12% (95% CI 7–16) into affective disorders on average over 6.3 years. Subgroup meta-analysis estimated prospective consistency of polymorphic psychotic disorder (55%; 95% CI 52–58) significantly greater than that of the ATPD subtypes with schizophrenic (OR 1.7; 95% CI 1.4–2.0) and predominantly delusional (OR 1.3; 95% CI 1.1–1.5) symptoms. Moreover, the diagnostic stability of BPD (13 studies; 294 cases) was 45% (95% CI 32–50) over a mean 4.2 years. Although these findings indicate that short-lived psychotic disorders have little predictive validity, significant differences among the ATPD subtypes support the revised ICD-11 ATPD category. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1007/s00406-021-01356-7 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>gale_proqu</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2617278374</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><galeid>A719403138</galeid><sourcerecordid>A719403138</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c442t-e0302a0a6c6c8184322d575760ed468435624589505f508886ed757f92ca62843</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kU1vEzEQhi0EoqHwBzggS1y4uIw_1t7lVqV8VCriQDlbxp5tXO2ug71JlX-Pk5QiEMI-WDPzvKMZv4S85HDGAczbAqBAMxCcAZeNZuYRWXAlJWtVxx-TBXQKGJdSnZBnpdwCAG8EPCUnUnVtq5VZkHK9QrrOGKKf4xbp1g0xxHlH3RRo2sw-jUhTTy-XF4zDIXvx9TNraFmlPLOhagJdl51fpTl6GmJJOWAu76ijGbcR7w6aEWfH3OSGXYnlOXnSu6Hgi_v3lHz78P56-Yldffl4uTy_Yl4pMTMECcKB0177lrdKChEa0xgNGJSucaOFatqugaZvoK0LYajlvhPeaVHrp-TNse86px8bLLMdY_E4DG7CtClWaG6EaaXZo6__Qm_TJtd5K2W44W0n63mgbtyANk59mrPz-6b23PD62ZLLtlJn_6DqDThGnybsY83_IRBHgc-plIy9Xec4uryzHOzeaXt02lan7cFpa6ro1f3Em-8jhgfJL2srII9AqaXpBvPvlf7T9ieYT67R</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2717189333</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>The predictive validity and outcome of ICD-10 and DSM-5 short-lived psychotic disorders: a review and meta-analysis</title><source>SpringerLink Journals - AutoHoldings</source><creator>Castagnini, Augusto ; Foldager, Leslie ; Caffo, Ernesto ; Berrios, German E.</creator><creatorcontrib>Castagnini, Augusto ; Foldager, Leslie ; Caffo, Ernesto ; Berrios, German E.</creatorcontrib><description>The ICD-10 Classification of Mental and Behavioural Disorders introduced the category of ‘acute and transient psychotic disorders’ (ATPDs) encompassing polymorphic, schizophrenic and predominantly delusional subtypes, and the forthcoming ICD-11 revision has restricted it to polymorphic psychotic disorder, while the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders (DSM-5) listed ‘brief psychotic disorder’ (BPD). To assess the predictive validity and outcome of ATPDs and BPD, relevant papers in English, French and German were searched in PubMed and Web of Science. Where possible meta-analysis of prognostic validators (diagnostic stability, course, outcome and response to treatment) was conducted. Fifty studies published between January 1993 and July 2019 were found. The clinical and functional outcome of ATPDs proved better than in schizophrenia and related disorders, but mortality risk is high, particularly suicide, and treatment trials provide little evidence. Meta-analysis of 25 studies (13,507 cases) revealed that 55% (95% CI 49–62) do not change diagnosis, 25% (95% CI 20–31) converted into schizophrenia and related disorders, and 12% (95% CI 7–16) into affective disorders on average over 6.3 years. Subgroup meta-analysis estimated prospective consistency of polymorphic psychotic disorder (55%; 95% CI 52–58) significantly greater than that of the ATPD subtypes with schizophrenic (OR 1.7; 95% CI 1.4–2.0) and predominantly delusional (OR 1.3; 95% CI 1.1–1.5) symptoms. Moreover, the diagnostic stability of BPD (13 studies; 294 cases) was 45% (95% CI 32–50) over a mean 4.2 years. Although these findings indicate that short-lived psychotic disorders have little predictive validity, significant differences among the ATPD subtypes support the revised ICD-11 ATPD category.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0940-1334</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1433-8491</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1007/s00406-021-01356-7</identifier><identifier>PMID: 34988647</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Berlin/Heidelberg: Springer Berlin Heidelberg</publisher><subject>Affective disorders ; Analysis ; Clinical trials ; Medical research ; Medicine ; Medicine & Public Health ; Medicine, Experimental ; Mental disorders ; Meta-analysis ; Neurosciences ; Original Paper ; Psychiatry ; Psychosis ; Schizophrenia ; Suicide ; Validity</subject><ispartof>European archives of psychiatry and clinical neuroscience, 2022-10, Vol.272 (7), p.1157-1168</ispartof><rights>The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany 2021</rights><rights>2021. The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany.</rights><rights>COPYRIGHT 2022 Springer</rights><rights>The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany 2021.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c442t-e0302a0a6c6c8184322d575760ed468435624589505f508886ed757f92ca62843</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c442t-e0302a0a6c6c8184322d575760ed468435624589505f508886ed757f92ca62843</cites><orcidid>0000-0002-0652-0264</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1007/s00406-021-01356-7$$EPDF$$P50$$Gspringer$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://link.springer.com/10.1007/s00406-021-01356-7$$EHTML$$P50$$Gspringer$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27922,27923,41486,42555,51317</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34988647$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Castagnini, Augusto</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Foldager, Leslie</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Caffo, Ernesto</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Berrios, German E.</creatorcontrib><title>The predictive validity and outcome of ICD-10 and DSM-5 short-lived psychotic disorders: a review and meta-analysis</title><title>European archives of psychiatry and clinical neuroscience</title><addtitle>Eur Arch Psychiatry Clin Neurosci</addtitle><addtitle>Eur Arch Psychiatry Clin Neurosci</addtitle><description>The ICD-10 Classification of Mental and Behavioural Disorders introduced the category of ‘acute and transient psychotic disorders’ (ATPDs) encompassing polymorphic, schizophrenic and predominantly delusional subtypes, and the forthcoming ICD-11 revision has restricted it to polymorphic psychotic disorder, while the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders (DSM-5) listed ‘brief psychotic disorder’ (BPD). To assess the predictive validity and outcome of ATPDs and BPD, relevant papers in English, French and German were searched in PubMed and Web of Science. Where possible meta-analysis of prognostic validators (diagnostic stability, course, outcome and response to treatment) was conducted. Fifty studies published between January 1993 and July 2019 were found. The clinical and functional outcome of ATPDs proved better than in schizophrenia and related disorders, but mortality risk is high, particularly suicide, and treatment trials provide little evidence. Meta-analysis of 25 studies (13,507 cases) revealed that 55% (95% CI 49–62) do not change diagnosis, 25% (95% CI 20–31) converted into schizophrenia and related disorders, and 12% (95% CI 7–16) into affective disorders on average over 6.3 years. Subgroup meta-analysis estimated prospective consistency of polymorphic psychotic disorder (55%; 95% CI 52–58) significantly greater than that of the ATPD subtypes with schizophrenic (OR 1.7; 95% CI 1.4–2.0) and predominantly delusional (OR 1.3; 95% CI 1.1–1.5) symptoms. Moreover, the diagnostic stability of BPD (13 studies; 294 cases) was 45% (95% CI 32–50) over a mean 4.2 years. Although these findings indicate that short-lived psychotic disorders have little predictive validity, significant differences among the ATPD subtypes support the revised ICD-11 ATPD category.</description><subject>Affective disorders</subject><subject>Analysis</subject><subject>Clinical trials</subject><subject>Medical research</subject><subject>Medicine</subject><subject>Medicine & Public Health</subject><subject>Medicine, Experimental</subject><subject>Mental disorders</subject><subject>Meta-analysis</subject><subject>Neurosciences</subject><subject>Original Paper</subject><subject>Psychiatry</subject><subject>Psychosis</subject><subject>Schizophrenia</subject><subject>Suicide</subject><subject>Validity</subject><issn>0940-1334</issn><issn>1433-8491</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2022</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>ABUWG</sourceid><sourceid>AFKRA</sourceid><sourceid>AZQEC</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>CCPQU</sourceid><sourceid>DWQXO</sourceid><sourceid>GNUQQ</sourceid><recordid>eNp9kU1vEzEQhi0EoqHwBzggS1y4uIw_1t7lVqV8VCriQDlbxp5tXO2ug71JlX-Pk5QiEMI-WDPzvKMZv4S85HDGAczbAqBAMxCcAZeNZuYRWXAlJWtVxx-TBXQKGJdSnZBnpdwCAG8EPCUnUnVtq5VZkHK9QrrOGKKf4xbp1g0xxHlH3RRo2sw-jUhTTy-XF4zDIXvx9TNraFmlPLOhagJdl51fpTl6GmJJOWAu76ijGbcR7w6aEWfH3OSGXYnlOXnSu6Hgi_v3lHz78P56-Yldffl4uTy_Yl4pMTMECcKB0177lrdKChEa0xgNGJSucaOFatqugaZvoK0LYajlvhPeaVHrp-TNse86px8bLLMdY_E4DG7CtClWaG6EaaXZo6__Qm_TJtd5K2W44W0n63mgbtyANk59mrPz-6b23PD62ZLLtlJn_6DqDThGnybsY83_IRBHgc-plIy9Xec4uryzHOzeaXt02lan7cFpa6ro1f3Em-8jhgfJL2srII9AqaXpBvPvlf7T9ieYT67R</recordid><startdate>20221001</startdate><enddate>20221001</enddate><creator>Castagnini, Augusto</creator><creator>Foldager, Leslie</creator><creator>Caffo, Ernesto</creator><creator>Berrios, German E.</creator><general>Springer Berlin Heidelberg</general><general>Springer</general><general>Springer Nature B.V</general><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7TK</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88E</scope><scope>88G</scope><scope>8AO</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>M1P</scope><scope>M2M</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>PSYQQ</scope><scope>Q9U</scope><scope>7X8</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0652-0264</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20221001</creationdate><title>The predictive validity and outcome of ICD-10 and DSM-5 short-lived psychotic disorders: a review and meta-analysis</title><author>Castagnini, Augusto ; Foldager, Leslie ; Caffo, Ernesto ; Berrios, German E.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c442t-e0302a0a6c6c8184322d575760ed468435624589505f508886ed757f92ca62843</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2022</creationdate><topic>Affective disorders</topic><topic>Analysis</topic><topic>Clinical trials</topic><topic>Medical research</topic><topic>Medicine</topic><topic>Medicine & Public Health</topic><topic>Medicine, Experimental</topic><topic>Mental disorders</topic><topic>Meta-analysis</topic><topic>Neurosciences</topic><topic>Original Paper</topic><topic>Psychiatry</topic><topic>Psychosis</topic><topic>Schizophrenia</topic><topic>Suicide</topic><topic>Validity</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Castagnini, Augusto</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Foldager, Leslie</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Caffo, Ernesto</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Berrios, German E.</creatorcontrib><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Neurosciences Abstracts</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Medical Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Psychology Database (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Pharma Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Medical Database</collection><collection>Psychology Database</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>ProQuest One Psychology</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>European archives of psychiatry and clinical neuroscience</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Castagnini, Augusto</au><au>Foldager, Leslie</au><au>Caffo, Ernesto</au><au>Berrios, German E.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>The predictive validity and outcome of ICD-10 and DSM-5 short-lived psychotic disorders: a review and meta-analysis</atitle><jtitle>European archives of psychiatry and clinical neuroscience</jtitle><stitle>Eur Arch Psychiatry Clin Neurosci</stitle><addtitle>Eur Arch Psychiatry Clin Neurosci</addtitle><date>2022-10-01</date><risdate>2022</risdate><volume>272</volume><issue>7</issue><spage>1157</spage><epage>1168</epage><pages>1157-1168</pages><issn>0940-1334</issn><eissn>1433-8491</eissn><abstract>The ICD-10 Classification of Mental and Behavioural Disorders introduced the category of ‘acute and transient psychotic disorders’ (ATPDs) encompassing polymorphic, schizophrenic and predominantly delusional subtypes, and the forthcoming ICD-11 revision has restricted it to polymorphic psychotic disorder, while the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders (DSM-5) listed ‘brief psychotic disorder’ (BPD). To assess the predictive validity and outcome of ATPDs and BPD, relevant papers in English, French and German were searched in PubMed and Web of Science. Where possible meta-analysis of prognostic validators (diagnostic stability, course, outcome and response to treatment) was conducted. Fifty studies published between January 1993 and July 2019 were found. The clinical and functional outcome of ATPDs proved better than in schizophrenia and related disorders, but mortality risk is high, particularly suicide, and treatment trials provide little evidence. Meta-analysis of 25 studies (13,507 cases) revealed that 55% (95% CI 49–62) do not change diagnosis, 25% (95% CI 20–31) converted into schizophrenia and related disorders, and 12% (95% CI 7–16) into affective disorders on average over 6.3 years. Subgroup meta-analysis estimated prospective consistency of polymorphic psychotic disorder (55%; 95% CI 52–58) significantly greater than that of the ATPD subtypes with schizophrenic (OR 1.7; 95% CI 1.4–2.0) and predominantly delusional (OR 1.3; 95% CI 1.1–1.5) symptoms. Moreover, the diagnostic stability of BPD (13 studies; 294 cases) was 45% (95% CI 32–50) over a mean 4.2 years. Although these findings indicate that short-lived psychotic disorders have little predictive validity, significant differences among the ATPD subtypes support the revised ICD-11 ATPD category.</abstract><cop>Berlin/Heidelberg</cop><pub>Springer Berlin Heidelberg</pub><pmid>34988647</pmid><doi>10.1007/s00406-021-01356-7</doi><tpages>12</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0652-0264</orcidid></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0940-1334 |
ispartof | European archives of psychiatry and clinical neuroscience, 2022-10, Vol.272 (7), p.1157-1168 |
issn | 0940-1334 1433-8491 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2617278374 |
source | SpringerLink Journals - AutoHoldings |
subjects | Affective disorders Analysis Clinical trials Medical research Medicine Medicine & Public Health Medicine, Experimental Mental disorders Meta-analysis Neurosciences Original Paper Psychiatry Psychosis Schizophrenia Suicide Validity |
title | The predictive validity and outcome of ICD-10 and DSM-5 short-lived psychotic disorders: a review and meta-analysis |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-14T05%3A43%3A21IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-gale_proqu&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=The%20predictive%20validity%20and%20outcome%20of%20ICD-10%20and%20DSM-5%20short-lived%20psychotic%20disorders:%20a%20review%20and%20meta-analysis&rft.jtitle=European%20archives%20of%20psychiatry%20and%20clinical%20neuroscience&rft.au=Castagnini,%20Augusto&rft.date=2022-10-01&rft.volume=272&rft.issue=7&rft.spage=1157&rft.epage=1168&rft.pages=1157-1168&rft.issn=0940-1334&rft.eissn=1433-8491&rft_id=info:doi/10.1007/s00406-021-01356-7&rft_dat=%3Cgale_proqu%3EA719403138%3C/gale_proqu%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2717189333&rft_id=info:pmid/34988647&rft_galeid=A719403138&rfr_iscdi=true |