The predictive validity and outcome of ICD-10 and DSM-5 short-lived psychotic disorders: a review and meta-analysis

The ICD-10 Classification of Mental and Behavioural Disorders introduced the category of ‘acute and transient psychotic disorders’ (ATPDs) encompassing polymorphic, schizophrenic and predominantly delusional subtypes, and the forthcoming ICD-11 revision has restricted it to polymorphic psychotic dis...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:European archives of psychiatry and clinical neuroscience 2022-10, Vol.272 (7), p.1157-1168
Hauptverfasser: Castagnini, Augusto, Foldager, Leslie, Caffo, Ernesto, Berrios, German E.
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 1168
container_issue 7
container_start_page 1157
container_title European archives of psychiatry and clinical neuroscience
container_volume 272
creator Castagnini, Augusto
Foldager, Leslie
Caffo, Ernesto
Berrios, German E.
description The ICD-10 Classification of Mental and Behavioural Disorders introduced the category of ‘acute and transient psychotic disorders’ (ATPDs) encompassing polymorphic, schizophrenic and predominantly delusional subtypes, and the forthcoming ICD-11 revision has restricted it to polymorphic psychotic disorder, while the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders (DSM-5) listed ‘brief psychotic disorder’ (BPD). To assess the predictive validity and outcome of ATPDs and BPD, relevant papers in English, French and German were searched in PubMed and Web of Science. Where possible meta-analysis of prognostic validators (diagnostic stability, course, outcome and response to treatment) was conducted. Fifty studies published between January 1993 and July 2019 were found. The clinical and functional outcome of ATPDs proved better than in schizophrenia and related disorders, but mortality risk is high, particularly suicide, and treatment trials provide little evidence. Meta-analysis of 25 studies (13,507 cases) revealed that 55% (95% CI 49–62) do not change diagnosis, 25% (95% CI 20–31) converted into schizophrenia and related disorders, and 12% (95% CI 7–16) into affective disorders on average over 6.3 years. Subgroup meta-analysis estimated prospective consistency of polymorphic psychotic disorder (55%; 95% CI 52–58) significantly greater than that of the ATPD subtypes with schizophrenic (OR 1.7; 95% CI 1.4–2.0) and predominantly delusional (OR 1.3; 95% CI 1.1–1.5) symptoms. Moreover, the diagnostic stability of BPD (13 studies; 294 cases) was 45% (95% CI 32–50) over a mean 4.2 years. Although these findings indicate that short-lived psychotic disorders have little predictive validity, significant differences among the ATPD subtypes support the revised ICD-11 ATPD category.
doi_str_mv 10.1007/s00406-021-01356-7
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>gale_proqu</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2617278374</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><galeid>A719403138</galeid><sourcerecordid>A719403138</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c442t-e0302a0a6c6c8184322d575760ed468435624589505f508886ed757f92ca62843</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kU1vEzEQhi0EoqHwBzggS1y4uIw_1t7lVqV8VCriQDlbxp5tXO2ug71JlX-Pk5QiEMI-WDPzvKMZv4S85HDGAczbAqBAMxCcAZeNZuYRWXAlJWtVxx-TBXQKGJdSnZBnpdwCAG8EPCUnUnVtq5VZkHK9QrrOGKKf4xbp1g0xxHlH3RRo2sw-jUhTTy-XF4zDIXvx9TNraFmlPLOhagJdl51fpTl6GmJJOWAu76ijGbcR7w6aEWfH3OSGXYnlOXnSu6Hgi_v3lHz78P56-Yldffl4uTy_Yl4pMTMECcKB0177lrdKChEa0xgNGJSucaOFatqugaZvoK0LYajlvhPeaVHrp-TNse86px8bLLMdY_E4DG7CtClWaG6EaaXZo6__Qm_TJtd5K2W44W0n63mgbtyANk59mrPz-6b23PD62ZLLtlJn_6DqDThGnybsY83_IRBHgc-plIy9Xec4uryzHOzeaXt02lan7cFpa6ro1f3Em-8jhgfJL2srII9AqaXpBvPvlf7T9ieYT67R</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2717189333</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>The predictive validity and outcome of ICD-10 and DSM-5 short-lived psychotic disorders: a review and meta-analysis</title><source>SpringerLink Journals - AutoHoldings</source><creator>Castagnini, Augusto ; Foldager, Leslie ; Caffo, Ernesto ; Berrios, German E.</creator><creatorcontrib>Castagnini, Augusto ; Foldager, Leslie ; Caffo, Ernesto ; Berrios, German E.</creatorcontrib><description>The ICD-10 Classification of Mental and Behavioural Disorders introduced the category of ‘acute and transient psychotic disorders’ (ATPDs) encompassing polymorphic, schizophrenic and predominantly delusional subtypes, and the forthcoming ICD-11 revision has restricted it to polymorphic psychotic disorder, while the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders (DSM-5) listed ‘brief psychotic disorder’ (BPD). To assess the predictive validity and outcome of ATPDs and BPD, relevant papers in English, French and German were searched in PubMed and Web of Science. Where possible meta-analysis of prognostic validators (diagnostic stability, course, outcome and response to treatment) was conducted. Fifty studies published between January 1993 and July 2019 were found. The clinical and functional outcome of ATPDs proved better than in schizophrenia and related disorders, but mortality risk is high, particularly suicide, and treatment trials provide little evidence. Meta-analysis of 25 studies (13,507 cases) revealed that 55% (95% CI 49–62) do not change diagnosis, 25% (95% CI 20–31) converted into schizophrenia and related disorders, and 12% (95% CI 7–16) into affective disorders on average over 6.3 years. Subgroup meta-analysis estimated prospective consistency of polymorphic psychotic disorder (55%; 95% CI 52–58) significantly greater than that of the ATPD subtypes with schizophrenic (OR 1.7; 95% CI 1.4–2.0) and predominantly delusional (OR 1.3; 95% CI 1.1–1.5) symptoms. Moreover, the diagnostic stability of BPD (13 studies; 294 cases) was 45% (95% CI 32–50) over a mean 4.2 years. Although these findings indicate that short-lived psychotic disorders have little predictive validity, significant differences among the ATPD subtypes support the revised ICD-11 ATPD category.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0940-1334</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1433-8491</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1007/s00406-021-01356-7</identifier><identifier>PMID: 34988647</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Berlin/Heidelberg: Springer Berlin Heidelberg</publisher><subject>Affective disorders ; Analysis ; Clinical trials ; Medical research ; Medicine ; Medicine &amp; Public Health ; Medicine, Experimental ; Mental disorders ; Meta-analysis ; Neurosciences ; Original Paper ; Psychiatry ; Psychosis ; Schizophrenia ; Suicide ; Validity</subject><ispartof>European archives of psychiatry and clinical neuroscience, 2022-10, Vol.272 (7), p.1157-1168</ispartof><rights>The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany 2021</rights><rights>2021. The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany.</rights><rights>COPYRIGHT 2022 Springer</rights><rights>The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany 2021.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c442t-e0302a0a6c6c8184322d575760ed468435624589505f508886ed757f92ca62843</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c442t-e0302a0a6c6c8184322d575760ed468435624589505f508886ed757f92ca62843</cites><orcidid>0000-0002-0652-0264</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1007/s00406-021-01356-7$$EPDF$$P50$$Gspringer$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://link.springer.com/10.1007/s00406-021-01356-7$$EHTML$$P50$$Gspringer$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27922,27923,41486,42555,51317</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34988647$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Castagnini, Augusto</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Foldager, Leslie</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Caffo, Ernesto</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Berrios, German E.</creatorcontrib><title>The predictive validity and outcome of ICD-10 and DSM-5 short-lived psychotic disorders: a review and meta-analysis</title><title>European archives of psychiatry and clinical neuroscience</title><addtitle>Eur Arch Psychiatry Clin Neurosci</addtitle><addtitle>Eur Arch Psychiatry Clin Neurosci</addtitle><description>The ICD-10 Classification of Mental and Behavioural Disorders introduced the category of ‘acute and transient psychotic disorders’ (ATPDs) encompassing polymorphic, schizophrenic and predominantly delusional subtypes, and the forthcoming ICD-11 revision has restricted it to polymorphic psychotic disorder, while the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders (DSM-5) listed ‘brief psychotic disorder’ (BPD). To assess the predictive validity and outcome of ATPDs and BPD, relevant papers in English, French and German were searched in PubMed and Web of Science. Where possible meta-analysis of prognostic validators (diagnostic stability, course, outcome and response to treatment) was conducted. Fifty studies published between January 1993 and July 2019 were found. The clinical and functional outcome of ATPDs proved better than in schizophrenia and related disorders, but mortality risk is high, particularly suicide, and treatment trials provide little evidence. Meta-analysis of 25 studies (13,507 cases) revealed that 55% (95% CI 49–62) do not change diagnosis, 25% (95% CI 20–31) converted into schizophrenia and related disorders, and 12% (95% CI 7–16) into affective disorders on average over 6.3 years. Subgroup meta-analysis estimated prospective consistency of polymorphic psychotic disorder (55%; 95% CI 52–58) significantly greater than that of the ATPD subtypes with schizophrenic (OR 1.7; 95% CI 1.4–2.0) and predominantly delusional (OR 1.3; 95% CI 1.1–1.5) symptoms. Moreover, the diagnostic stability of BPD (13 studies; 294 cases) was 45% (95% CI 32–50) over a mean 4.2 years. Although these findings indicate that short-lived psychotic disorders have little predictive validity, significant differences among the ATPD subtypes support the revised ICD-11 ATPD category.</description><subject>Affective disorders</subject><subject>Analysis</subject><subject>Clinical trials</subject><subject>Medical research</subject><subject>Medicine</subject><subject>Medicine &amp; Public Health</subject><subject>Medicine, Experimental</subject><subject>Mental disorders</subject><subject>Meta-analysis</subject><subject>Neurosciences</subject><subject>Original Paper</subject><subject>Psychiatry</subject><subject>Psychosis</subject><subject>Schizophrenia</subject><subject>Suicide</subject><subject>Validity</subject><issn>0940-1334</issn><issn>1433-8491</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2022</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>ABUWG</sourceid><sourceid>AFKRA</sourceid><sourceid>AZQEC</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>CCPQU</sourceid><sourceid>DWQXO</sourceid><sourceid>GNUQQ</sourceid><recordid>eNp9kU1vEzEQhi0EoqHwBzggS1y4uIw_1t7lVqV8VCriQDlbxp5tXO2ug71JlX-Pk5QiEMI-WDPzvKMZv4S85HDGAczbAqBAMxCcAZeNZuYRWXAlJWtVxx-TBXQKGJdSnZBnpdwCAG8EPCUnUnVtq5VZkHK9QrrOGKKf4xbp1g0xxHlH3RRo2sw-jUhTTy-XF4zDIXvx9TNraFmlPLOhagJdl51fpTl6GmJJOWAu76ijGbcR7w6aEWfH3OSGXYnlOXnSu6Hgi_v3lHz78P56-Yldffl4uTy_Yl4pMTMECcKB0177lrdKChEa0xgNGJSucaOFatqugaZvoK0LYajlvhPeaVHrp-TNse86px8bLLMdY_E4DG7CtClWaG6EaaXZo6__Qm_TJtd5K2W44W0n63mgbtyANk59mrPz-6b23PD62ZLLtlJn_6DqDThGnybsY83_IRBHgc-plIy9Xec4uryzHOzeaXt02lan7cFpa6ro1f3Em-8jhgfJL2srII9AqaXpBvPvlf7T9ieYT67R</recordid><startdate>20221001</startdate><enddate>20221001</enddate><creator>Castagnini, Augusto</creator><creator>Foldager, Leslie</creator><creator>Caffo, Ernesto</creator><creator>Berrios, German E.</creator><general>Springer Berlin Heidelberg</general><general>Springer</general><general>Springer Nature B.V</general><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7TK</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88E</scope><scope>88G</scope><scope>8AO</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>M1P</scope><scope>M2M</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>PSYQQ</scope><scope>Q9U</scope><scope>7X8</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0652-0264</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20221001</creationdate><title>The predictive validity and outcome of ICD-10 and DSM-5 short-lived psychotic disorders: a review and meta-analysis</title><author>Castagnini, Augusto ; Foldager, Leslie ; Caffo, Ernesto ; Berrios, German E.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c442t-e0302a0a6c6c8184322d575760ed468435624589505f508886ed757f92ca62843</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2022</creationdate><topic>Affective disorders</topic><topic>Analysis</topic><topic>Clinical trials</topic><topic>Medical research</topic><topic>Medicine</topic><topic>Medicine &amp; Public Health</topic><topic>Medicine, Experimental</topic><topic>Mental disorders</topic><topic>Meta-analysis</topic><topic>Neurosciences</topic><topic>Original Paper</topic><topic>Psychiatry</topic><topic>Psychosis</topic><topic>Schizophrenia</topic><topic>Suicide</topic><topic>Validity</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Castagnini, Augusto</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Foldager, Leslie</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Caffo, Ernesto</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Berrios, German E.</creatorcontrib><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Neurosciences Abstracts</collection><collection>Health &amp; Medical Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Medical Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Psychology Database (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Pharma Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>ProQuest Health &amp; Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Health &amp; Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Medical Database</collection><collection>Psychology Database</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>ProQuest One Psychology</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>European archives of psychiatry and clinical neuroscience</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Castagnini, Augusto</au><au>Foldager, Leslie</au><au>Caffo, Ernesto</au><au>Berrios, German E.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>The predictive validity and outcome of ICD-10 and DSM-5 short-lived psychotic disorders: a review and meta-analysis</atitle><jtitle>European archives of psychiatry and clinical neuroscience</jtitle><stitle>Eur Arch Psychiatry Clin Neurosci</stitle><addtitle>Eur Arch Psychiatry Clin Neurosci</addtitle><date>2022-10-01</date><risdate>2022</risdate><volume>272</volume><issue>7</issue><spage>1157</spage><epage>1168</epage><pages>1157-1168</pages><issn>0940-1334</issn><eissn>1433-8491</eissn><abstract>The ICD-10 Classification of Mental and Behavioural Disorders introduced the category of ‘acute and transient psychotic disorders’ (ATPDs) encompassing polymorphic, schizophrenic and predominantly delusional subtypes, and the forthcoming ICD-11 revision has restricted it to polymorphic psychotic disorder, while the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders (DSM-5) listed ‘brief psychotic disorder’ (BPD). To assess the predictive validity and outcome of ATPDs and BPD, relevant papers in English, French and German were searched in PubMed and Web of Science. Where possible meta-analysis of prognostic validators (diagnostic stability, course, outcome and response to treatment) was conducted. Fifty studies published between January 1993 and July 2019 were found. The clinical and functional outcome of ATPDs proved better than in schizophrenia and related disorders, but mortality risk is high, particularly suicide, and treatment trials provide little evidence. Meta-analysis of 25 studies (13,507 cases) revealed that 55% (95% CI 49–62) do not change diagnosis, 25% (95% CI 20–31) converted into schizophrenia and related disorders, and 12% (95% CI 7–16) into affective disorders on average over 6.3 years. Subgroup meta-analysis estimated prospective consistency of polymorphic psychotic disorder (55%; 95% CI 52–58) significantly greater than that of the ATPD subtypes with schizophrenic (OR 1.7; 95% CI 1.4–2.0) and predominantly delusional (OR 1.3; 95% CI 1.1–1.5) symptoms. Moreover, the diagnostic stability of BPD (13 studies; 294 cases) was 45% (95% CI 32–50) over a mean 4.2 years. Although these findings indicate that short-lived psychotic disorders have little predictive validity, significant differences among the ATPD subtypes support the revised ICD-11 ATPD category.</abstract><cop>Berlin/Heidelberg</cop><pub>Springer Berlin Heidelberg</pub><pmid>34988647</pmid><doi>10.1007/s00406-021-01356-7</doi><tpages>12</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0652-0264</orcidid></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0940-1334
ispartof European archives of psychiatry and clinical neuroscience, 2022-10, Vol.272 (7), p.1157-1168
issn 0940-1334
1433-8491
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2617278374
source SpringerLink Journals - AutoHoldings
subjects Affective disorders
Analysis
Clinical trials
Medical research
Medicine
Medicine & Public Health
Medicine, Experimental
Mental disorders
Meta-analysis
Neurosciences
Original Paper
Psychiatry
Psychosis
Schizophrenia
Suicide
Validity
title The predictive validity and outcome of ICD-10 and DSM-5 short-lived psychotic disorders: a review and meta-analysis
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-14T05%3A43%3A21IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-gale_proqu&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=The%20predictive%20validity%20and%20outcome%20of%20ICD-10%20and%20DSM-5%20short-lived%20psychotic%20disorders:%20a%20review%20and%20meta-analysis&rft.jtitle=European%20archives%20of%20psychiatry%20and%20clinical%20neuroscience&rft.au=Castagnini,%20Augusto&rft.date=2022-10-01&rft.volume=272&rft.issue=7&rft.spage=1157&rft.epage=1168&rft.pages=1157-1168&rft.issn=0940-1334&rft.eissn=1433-8491&rft_id=info:doi/10.1007/s00406-021-01356-7&rft_dat=%3Cgale_proqu%3EA719403138%3C/gale_proqu%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2717189333&rft_id=info:pmid/34988647&rft_galeid=A719403138&rfr_iscdi=true