Animal mortality during fire
Earth's rapidly warming climate is propelling us towards an increasingly fire‐prone future. Currently, knowledge of the extent and characteristics of animal mortality rates during fire remains rudimentary, hindering our ability to predict how animal populations may be impacted in the future. To...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Global change biology 2022-03, Vol.28 (6), p.2053-2065 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 2065 |
---|---|
container_issue | 6 |
container_start_page | 2053 |
container_title | Global change biology |
container_volume | 28 |
creator | Jolly, Chris J. Dickman, Chris R. Doherty, Tim S. Eeden, Lily M. Geary, William L. Legge, Sarah M. Woinarski, John C. Z. Nimmo, Dale G. |
description | Earth's rapidly warming climate is propelling us towards an increasingly fire‐prone future. Currently, knowledge of the extent and characteristics of animal mortality rates during fire remains rudimentary, hindering our ability to predict how animal populations may be impacted in the future. To address this knowledge gap, we conducted a global systematic review of the direct effects of fire on animal mortality rates, based on studies that unequivocally determined the fate of animals during fire. From 31 studies spanning 1984–2020, we extracted data on the direct impacts of fire on the mortality of 31 species from 23 families. From these studies, there were 43 instances where direct effects were measured by reporting animal survival from pre‐ to post‐fire. Most studies were conducted in North America (52%) and Oceania (42%), focused largely on mammals (53%) and reptiles (30%), and reported mostly on animal survival in planned (82%) and/or low severity (70%) fires. We found no studies from Asia, Europe or South America. Although there were insufficient data to conduct a formal meta‐analysis, we tested the effect of fire type, fire severity, fire regime, animal body mass, ecological attributes and class on survival. Only fire severity affected animal mortality, with a higher proportion of animals being killed by high than low severity fires. Recent catastrophic fires across the globe have drawn attention to the plight of animals exposed to wildfire. Yet, our systematic review suggests that a relatively low proportion of animals (mean predicted mortality [95% CI] = 3% [1%–9%]) are killed during fire. However, our review also underscores how little we currently know about the direct effects of fire on animal mortality, and highlights the critical need to understand the effects of high severity fire on animal populations.
Our understanding of animal mortality rates during fire is rudimentary. Here, we conducted a global systematic review of the direct effects of fire on animal mortality rates. From 31 studies spanning 1984–2020, we extracted data on the direct impacts of fire on the mortality of 31 species from 23 families. Our systematic review suggests that a relatively low proportion of animals (3% [1%–9%]) are killed during fire. However, our review also underscores how little we currently know about the direct effects of fire on animal mortality, and highlights the critical need to understand the effects of high severity fire on animal populations. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1111/gcb.16044 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2617277113</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2617277113</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4194-6a45f4af140d8029b0fe09337cc3ae12843b0d5872c2045e526a064325dd222c3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp10D1PwzAQBmALgWgpDOwIVWKBIe35_JFkLBUUpEosMFuO41Sp8lHsRlX_PS4pDEh4OQ-PXt29hFxTmNDwpiuTTagEzk_IkDIpIuSJPD38BY8oUDYgF96vAYAhyHMyYDxNUpB0SG5mTVnraly3bqurcrsf550rm9W4KJ29JGeFrry9Os4R-Xh-ep-_RMu3xet8towMpymPpOai4LqgHPIEMM2gsJAyFhvDtKWYcJZBLpIYDQIXVqDUIDlDkeeIaNiI3Pe5G9d-dtZvVV16Y6tKN7btvEJJY4xjSlmgd3_ouu1cE7YLChMUXKYyqIdeGdd672yhNi6c6faKgjpUpkJl6ruyYG-PiV1W2_xX_nQUwLQHu7Ky-_-T1GL-2Ed-ARuLcOg</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2628254696</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Animal mortality during fire</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Wiley Online Library Journals Frontfile Complete</source><creator>Jolly, Chris J. ; Dickman, Chris R. ; Doherty, Tim S. ; Eeden, Lily M. ; Geary, William L. ; Legge, Sarah M. ; Woinarski, John C. Z. ; Nimmo, Dale G.</creator><creatorcontrib>Jolly, Chris J. ; Dickman, Chris R. ; Doherty, Tim S. ; Eeden, Lily M. ; Geary, William L. ; Legge, Sarah M. ; Woinarski, John C. Z. ; Nimmo, Dale G.</creatorcontrib><description>Earth's rapidly warming climate is propelling us towards an increasingly fire‐prone future. Currently, knowledge of the extent and characteristics of animal mortality rates during fire remains rudimentary, hindering our ability to predict how animal populations may be impacted in the future. To address this knowledge gap, we conducted a global systematic review of the direct effects of fire on animal mortality rates, based on studies that unequivocally determined the fate of animals during fire. From 31 studies spanning 1984–2020, we extracted data on the direct impacts of fire on the mortality of 31 species from 23 families. From these studies, there were 43 instances where direct effects were measured by reporting animal survival from pre‐ to post‐fire. Most studies were conducted in North America (52%) and Oceania (42%), focused largely on mammals (53%) and reptiles (30%), and reported mostly on animal survival in planned (82%) and/or low severity (70%) fires. We found no studies from Asia, Europe or South America. Although there were insufficient data to conduct a formal meta‐analysis, we tested the effect of fire type, fire severity, fire regime, animal body mass, ecological attributes and class on survival. Only fire severity affected animal mortality, with a higher proportion of animals being killed by high than low severity fires. Recent catastrophic fires across the globe have drawn attention to the plight of animals exposed to wildfire. Yet, our systematic review suggests that a relatively low proportion of animals (mean predicted mortality [95% CI] = 3% [1%–9%]) are killed during fire. However, our review also underscores how little we currently know about the direct effects of fire on animal mortality, and highlights the critical need to understand the effects of high severity fire on animal populations.
Our understanding of animal mortality rates during fire is rudimentary. Here, we conducted a global systematic review of the direct effects of fire on animal mortality rates. From 31 studies spanning 1984–2020, we extracted data on the direct impacts of fire on the mortality of 31 species from 23 families. Our systematic review suggests that a relatively low proportion of animals (3% [1%–9%]) are killed during fire. However, our review also underscores how little we currently know about the direct effects of fire on animal mortality, and highlights the critical need to understand the effects of high severity fire on animal populations.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1354-1013</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1365-2486</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1111/gcb.16044</identifier><identifier>PMID: 34989061</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>England: Blackwell Publishing Ltd</publisher><subject>Animal population ; Animal populations ; Animals ; Body mass ; Climate ; death ; disturbance ; Ecological effects ; Ecosystem ; Europe ; Fires ; Humans ; Mammals ; megafire ; Meta-analysis ; Mortality ; Populations ; Pyrocene ; Reptiles ; Reviews ; Survival ; Systematic review ; tracking ; wildfire ; Wildfires</subject><ispartof>Global change biology, 2022-03, Vol.28 (6), p.2053-2065</ispartof><rights>2022 John Wiley & Sons Ltd</rights><rights>2022 John Wiley & Sons Ltd.</rights><rights>Copyright © 2022 John Wiley & Sons Ltd</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4194-6a45f4af140d8029b0fe09337cc3ae12843b0d5872c2045e526a064325dd222c3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4194-6a45f4af140d8029b0fe09337cc3ae12843b0d5872c2045e526a064325dd222c3</cites><orcidid>0000-0001-6968-2781 ; 0000-0002-0456-9670 ; 0000-0002-5234-0897 ; 0000-0002-1712-9500 ; 0000-0002-9814-1009 ; 0000-0001-7745-0251 ; 0000-0002-6520-689X ; 0000-0002-1067-3730</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1111%2Fgcb.16044$$EPDF$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1111%2Fgcb.16044$$EHTML$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,1411,27901,27902,45550,45551</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34989061$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Jolly, Chris J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Dickman, Chris R.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Doherty, Tim S.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Eeden, Lily M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Geary, William L.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Legge, Sarah M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Woinarski, John C. Z.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Nimmo, Dale G.</creatorcontrib><title>Animal mortality during fire</title><title>Global change biology</title><addtitle>Glob Chang Biol</addtitle><description>Earth's rapidly warming climate is propelling us towards an increasingly fire‐prone future. Currently, knowledge of the extent and characteristics of animal mortality rates during fire remains rudimentary, hindering our ability to predict how animal populations may be impacted in the future. To address this knowledge gap, we conducted a global systematic review of the direct effects of fire on animal mortality rates, based on studies that unequivocally determined the fate of animals during fire. From 31 studies spanning 1984–2020, we extracted data on the direct impacts of fire on the mortality of 31 species from 23 families. From these studies, there were 43 instances where direct effects were measured by reporting animal survival from pre‐ to post‐fire. Most studies were conducted in North America (52%) and Oceania (42%), focused largely on mammals (53%) and reptiles (30%), and reported mostly on animal survival in planned (82%) and/or low severity (70%) fires. We found no studies from Asia, Europe or South America. Although there were insufficient data to conduct a formal meta‐analysis, we tested the effect of fire type, fire severity, fire regime, animal body mass, ecological attributes and class on survival. Only fire severity affected animal mortality, with a higher proportion of animals being killed by high than low severity fires. Recent catastrophic fires across the globe have drawn attention to the plight of animals exposed to wildfire. Yet, our systematic review suggests that a relatively low proportion of animals (mean predicted mortality [95% CI] = 3% [1%–9%]) are killed during fire. However, our review also underscores how little we currently know about the direct effects of fire on animal mortality, and highlights the critical need to understand the effects of high severity fire on animal populations.
Our understanding of animal mortality rates during fire is rudimentary. Here, we conducted a global systematic review of the direct effects of fire on animal mortality rates. From 31 studies spanning 1984–2020, we extracted data on the direct impacts of fire on the mortality of 31 species from 23 families. Our systematic review suggests that a relatively low proportion of animals (3% [1%–9%]) are killed during fire. However, our review also underscores how little we currently know about the direct effects of fire on animal mortality, and highlights the critical need to understand the effects of high severity fire on animal populations.</description><subject>Animal population</subject><subject>Animal populations</subject><subject>Animals</subject><subject>Body mass</subject><subject>Climate</subject><subject>death</subject><subject>disturbance</subject><subject>Ecological effects</subject><subject>Ecosystem</subject><subject>Europe</subject><subject>Fires</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Mammals</subject><subject>megafire</subject><subject>Meta-analysis</subject><subject>Mortality</subject><subject>Populations</subject><subject>Pyrocene</subject><subject>Reptiles</subject><subject>Reviews</subject><subject>Survival</subject><subject>Systematic review</subject><subject>tracking</subject><subject>wildfire</subject><subject>Wildfires</subject><issn>1354-1013</issn><issn>1365-2486</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2022</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNp10D1PwzAQBmALgWgpDOwIVWKBIe35_JFkLBUUpEosMFuO41Sp8lHsRlX_PS4pDEh4OQ-PXt29hFxTmNDwpiuTTagEzk_IkDIpIuSJPD38BY8oUDYgF96vAYAhyHMyYDxNUpB0SG5mTVnraly3bqurcrsf550rm9W4KJ29JGeFrry9Os4R-Xh-ep-_RMu3xet8towMpymPpOai4LqgHPIEMM2gsJAyFhvDtKWYcJZBLpIYDQIXVqDUIDlDkeeIaNiI3Pe5G9d-dtZvVV16Y6tKN7btvEJJY4xjSlmgd3_ouu1cE7YLChMUXKYyqIdeGdd672yhNi6c6faKgjpUpkJl6ruyYG-PiV1W2_xX_nQUwLQHu7Ky-_-T1GL-2Ed-ARuLcOg</recordid><startdate>202203</startdate><enddate>202203</enddate><creator>Jolly, Chris J.</creator><creator>Dickman, Chris R.</creator><creator>Doherty, Tim S.</creator><creator>Eeden, Lily M.</creator><creator>Geary, William L.</creator><creator>Legge, Sarah M.</creator><creator>Woinarski, John C. Z.</creator><creator>Nimmo, Dale G.</creator><general>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7SN</scope><scope>7UA</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>F1W</scope><scope>H97</scope><scope>L.G</scope><scope>7X8</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6968-2781</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0456-9670</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5234-0897</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1712-9500</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9814-1009</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7745-0251</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6520-689X</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1067-3730</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>202203</creationdate><title>Animal mortality during fire</title><author>Jolly, Chris J. ; Dickman, Chris R. ; Doherty, Tim S. ; Eeden, Lily M. ; Geary, William L. ; Legge, Sarah M. ; Woinarski, John C. Z. ; Nimmo, Dale G.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c4194-6a45f4af140d8029b0fe09337cc3ae12843b0d5872c2045e526a064325dd222c3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2022</creationdate><topic>Animal population</topic><topic>Animal populations</topic><topic>Animals</topic><topic>Body mass</topic><topic>Climate</topic><topic>death</topic><topic>disturbance</topic><topic>Ecological effects</topic><topic>Ecosystem</topic><topic>Europe</topic><topic>Fires</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Mammals</topic><topic>megafire</topic><topic>Meta-analysis</topic><topic>Mortality</topic><topic>Populations</topic><topic>Pyrocene</topic><topic>Reptiles</topic><topic>Reviews</topic><topic>Survival</topic><topic>Systematic review</topic><topic>tracking</topic><topic>wildfire</topic><topic>Wildfires</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Jolly, Chris J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Dickman, Chris R.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Doherty, Tim S.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Eeden, Lily M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Geary, William L.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Legge, Sarah M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Woinarski, John C. Z.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Nimmo, Dale G.</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Ecology Abstracts</collection><collection>Water Resources Abstracts</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>ASFA: Aquatic Sciences and Fisheries Abstracts</collection><collection>Aquatic Science & Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) 3: Aquatic Pollution & Environmental Quality</collection><collection>Aquatic Science & Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) Professional</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Global change biology</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Jolly, Chris J.</au><au>Dickman, Chris R.</au><au>Doherty, Tim S.</au><au>Eeden, Lily M.</au><au>Geary, William L.</au><au>Legge, Sarah M.</au><au>Woinarski, John C. Z.</au><au>Nimmo, Dale G.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Animal mortality during fire</atitle><jtitle>Global change biology</jtitle><addtitle>Glob Chang Biol</addtitle><date>2022-03</date><risdate>2022</risdate><volume>28</volume><issue>6</issue><spage>2053</spage><epage>2065</epage><pages>2053-2065</pages><issn>1354-1013</issn><eissn>1365-2486</eissn><abstract>Earth's rapidly warming climate is propelling us towards an increasingly fire‐prone future. Currently, knowledge of the extent and characteristics of animal mortality rates during fire remains rudimentary, hindering our ability to predict how animal populations may be impacted in the future. To address this knowledge gap, we conducted a global systematic review of the direct effects of fire on animal mortality rates, based on studies that unequivocally determined the fate of animals during fire. From 31 studies spanning 1984–2020, we extracted data on the direct impacts of fire on the mortality of 31 species from 23 families. From these studies, there were 43 instances where direct effects were measured by reporting animal survival from pre‐ to post‐fire. Most studies were conducted in North America (52%) and Oceania (42%), focused largely on mammals (53%) and reptiles (30%), and reported mostly on animal survival in planned (82%) and/or low severity (70%) fires. We found no studies from Asia, Europe or South America. Although there were insufficient data to conduct a formal meta‐analysis, we tested the effect of fire type, fire severity, fire regime, animal body mass, ecological attributes and class on survival. Only fire severity affected animal mortality, with a higher proportion of animals being killed by high than low severity fires. Recent catastrophic fires across the globe have drawn attention to the plight of animals exposed to wildfire. Yet, our systematic review suggests that a relatively low proportion of animals (mean predicted mortality [95% CI] = 3% [1%–9%]) are killed during fire. However, our review also underscores how little we currently know about the direct effects of fire on animal mortality, and highlights the critical need to understand the effects of high severity fire on animal populations.
Our understanding of animal mortality rates during fire is rudimentary. Here, we conducted a global systematic review of the direct effects of fire on animal mortality rates. From 31 studies spanning 1984–2020, we extracted data on the direct impacts of fire on the mortality of 31 species from 23 families. Our systematic review suggests that a relatively low proportion of animals (3% [1%–9%]) are killed during fire. However, our review also underscores how little we currently know about the direct effects of fire on animal mortality, and highlights the critical need to understand the effects of high severity fire on animal populations.</abstract><cop>England</cop><pub>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</pub><pmid>34989061</pmid><doi>10.1111/gcb.16044</doi><tpages>13</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6968-2781</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0456-9670</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5234-0897</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1712-9500</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9814-1009</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7745-0251</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6520-689X</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1067-3730</orcidid></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 1354-1013 |
ispartof | Global change biology, 2022-03, Vol.28 (6), p.2053-2065 |
issn | 1354-1013 1365-2486 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2617277113 |
source | MEDLINE; Wiley Online Library Journals Frontfile Complete |
subjects | Animal population Animal populations Animals Body mass Climate death disturbance Ecological effects Ecosystem Europe Fires Humans Mammals megafire Meta-analysis Mortality Populations Pyrocene Reptiles Reviews Survival Systematic review tracking wildfire Wildfires |
title | Animal mortality during fire |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-05T15%3A01%3A09IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Animal%20mortality%20during%20fire&rft.jtitle=Global%20change%20biology&rft.au=Jolly,%20Chris%20J.&rft.date=2022-03&rft.volume=28&rft.issue=6&rft.spage=2053&rft.epage=2065&rft.pages=2053-2065&rft.issn=1354-1013&rft.eissn=1365-2486&rft_id=info:doi/10.1111/gcb.16044&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2617277113%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2628254696&rft_id=info:pmid/34989061&rfr_iscdi=true |