Continuous background correction of refractive index signal to improve monoclonal antibody concentration monitoring during UF/DF and SPTFF operations
Inline refractive index (RI) has the potential for monitoring protein concentration during final bulk concentration. While useful for monitoring and controlling product concentration, RI is sensitive to the respective background buffer being used for processing. This raises concerns around variation...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Bioprocess and biosystems engineering 2022-04, Vol.45 (4), p.647-657 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 657 |
---|---|
container_issue | 4 |
container_start_page | 647 |
container_title | Bioprocess and biosystems engineering |
container_volume | 45 |
creator | Webster, Thaddaeus A. Turner, Kelley DuBois, Caitlin MacDougall, Ryan Mason, Carrie |
description | Inline refractive index (RI) has the potential for monitoring protein concentration during final bulk concentration. While useful for monitoring and controlling product concentration, RI is sensitive to the respective background buffer being used for processing. This raises concerns around variations in buffer preparations, and during diafiltration where the buffer background is a mixture of different buffers during exchange. This study evaluated whether the use of a RI probe in the permeate line could facilitate continuous background subtraction (dual RI) and improve concentration monitoring during ultrafiltration/diafiltration and single pass TFF concentration for IgG1 and IgG4 antibodies. The proposed dual RI strategy yielded reductions in % error compared to the use of a single refractive index estimate from the retentate line (6.18% vs 8.63% for IgG4 and 2.65% vs 8.85% for IgG1) during traditional ultrafiltration/diafiltration. The improvement in IgG estimates were best during diafiltration where the continuous background subtraction of the permeate RI-enabled continuous monitoring of antibody material without knowledge of what the background buffer was compared to the use of a single RI estimate (6.47% vs 10.79% for IgG4 and 3.29% vs 19.59% for IgG1). In contrast minimal improvement to accuracy was obtained when using SPTFF as a concentration step. The ability to monitor product concentration changes via the proposed dual RI approach removes the need for complex calibrations, minimal worry about changing buffer backgrounds during diafiltration, and could enable better process control during product concentration in the cGMP manufacture of biologics. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1007/s00449-021-02683-8 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2617272081</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2642624577</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c375t-1b927c77d9b693c0255822ab705e7ed421cec31e71fbfe01faa0d897adef65fa3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kcFu1DAQhi1ERUvhBTggS1y4hNpOHCdHtBBAqlQk2rPl2JOVS2IvdlLRB-n7dnbTgtRDD9bYo29-65-fkHecfeKMqbPMWFW1BRMcT92URfOCnPCay0LVTL58vMuWH5PXOV8zxmUj2CtyXFZt0zaqPCF3mxhmH5a4ZNob-3ub4hIctTElsLOPgcaBJhiSwdcNUB8c_KXZb4MZ6Rypn3YpYn-KIdox7rsGBfvoblEkWAhzMgcdJPwckw9b6pZDuerOvnSIO_rr52XX0biDlc1vyNFgxgxvH-opueq-Xm6-F-cX335sPp8XtlRyLnjfCmWVcm1ft6VlQqI_YXrFJChwleAWbMlB8aEfgPHBGOaaVhkHQy0HU56Sj6sumvizQJ715LOFcTQBcCNa1FwJJVjDEf3wBL2OS0K_e6oStaikUkiJlbIp5ox707vkJ5NuNWd6H5peQ9MYmj6Ephscev8gvfQTuH8jjykhUK5A3u0XB-n_38_I3gOBBaWk</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2642624577</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Continuous background correction of refractive index signal to improve monoclonal antibody concentration monitoring during UF/DF and SPTFF operations</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>SpringerLink Journals</source><creator>Webster, Thaddaeus A. ; Turner, Kelley ; DuBois, Caitlin ; MacDougall, Ryan ; Mason, Carrie</creator><creatorcontrib>Webster, Thaddaeus A. ; Turner, Kelley ; DuBois, Caitlin ; MacDougall, Ryan ; Mason, Carrie</creatorcontrib><description>Inline refractive index (RI) has the potential for monitoring protein concentration during final bulk concentration. While useful for monitoring and controlling product concentration, RI is sensitive to the respective background buffer being used for processing. This raises concerns around variations in buffer preparations, and during diafiltration where the buffer background is a mixture of different buffers during exchange. This study evaluated whether the use of a RI probe in the permeate line could facilitate continuous background subtraction (dual RI) and improve concentration monitoring during ultrafiltration/diafiltration and single pass TFF concentration for IgG1 and IgG4 antibodies. The proposed dual RI strategy yielded reductions in % error compared to the use of a single refractive index estimate from the retentate line (6.18% vs 8.63% for IgG4 and 2.65% vs 8.85% for IgG1) during traditional ultrafiltration/diafiltration. The improvement in IgG estimates were best during diafiltration where the continuous background subtraction of the permeate RI-enabled continuous monitoring of antibody material without knowledge of what the background buffer was compared to the use of a single RI estimate (6.47% vs 10.79% for IgG4 and 3.29% vs 19.59% for IgG1). In contrast minimal improvement to accuracy was obtained when using SPTFF as a concentration step. The ability to monitor product concentration changes via the proposed dual RI approach removes the need for complex calibrations, minimal worry about changing buffer backgrounds during diafiltration, and could enable better process control during product concentration in the cGMP manufacture of biologics.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1615-7591</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1615-7605</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1007/s00449-021-02683-8</identifier><identifier>PMID: 34989873</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Berlin/Heidelberg: Springer Berlin Heidelberg</publisher><subject>Antibodies, Monoclonal ; Biotechnology ; Buffers ; Calibration ; Chemistry ; Chemistry and Materials Science ; Cyclic GMP ; Environmental Engineering/Biotechnology ; Error reduction ; Food Science ; Immunoglobulin G ; Industrial and Production Engineering ; Industrial Chemistry/Chemical Engineering ; Monitoring ; Monoclonal antibodies ; Process control ; Process controls ; Proteins ; Refractivity ; Refractometry ; Research Paper ; Subtraction ; Ultrafiltration</subject><ispartof>Bioprocess and biosystems engineering, 2022-04, Vol.45 (4), p.647-657</ispartof><rights>The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature 2022</rights><rights>2022. The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature.</rights><rights>The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature 2022.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c375t-1b927c77d9b693c0255822ab705e7ed421cec31e71fbfe01faa0d897adef65fa3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c375t-1b927c77d9b693c0255822ab705e7ed421cec31e71fbfe01faa0d897adef65fa3</cites><orcidid>0000-0002-2923-4711</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1007/s00449-021-02683-8$$EPDF$$P50$$Gspringer$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://link.springer.com/10.1007/s00449-021-02683-8$$EHTML$$P50$$Gspringer$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,777,781,27905,27906,41469,42538,51300</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34989873$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Webster, Thaddaeus A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Turner, Kelley</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>DuBois, Caitlin</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>MacDougall, Ryan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mason, Carrie</creatorcontrib><title>Continuous background correction of refractive index signal to improve monoclonal antibody concentration monitoring during UF/DF and SPTFF operations</title><title>Bioprocess and biosystems engineering</title><addtitle>Bioprocess Biosyst Eng</addtitle><addtitle>Bioprocess Biosyst Eng</addtitle><description>Inline refractive index (RI) has the potential for monitoring protein concentration during final bulk concentration. While useful for monitoring and controlling product concentration, RI is sensitive to the respective background buffer being used for processing. This raises concerns around variations in buffer preparations, and during diafiltration where the buffer background is a mixture of different buffers during exchange. This study evaluated whether the use of a RI probe in the permeate line could facilitate continuous background subtraction (dual RI) and improve concentration monitoring during ultrafiltration/diafiltration and single pass TFF concentration for IgG1 and IgG4 antibodies. The proposed dual RI strategy yielded reductions in % error compared to the use of a single refractive index estimate from the retentate line (6.18% vs 8.63% for IgG4 and 2.65% vs 8.85% for IgG1) during traditional ultrafiltration/diafiltration. The improvement in IgG estimates were best during diafiltration where the continuous background subtraction of the permeate RI-enabled continuous monitoring of antibody material without knowledge of what the background buffer was compared to the use of a single RI estimate (6.47% vs 10.79% for IgG4 and 3.29% vs 19.59% for IgG1). In contrast minimal improvement to accuracy was obtained when using SPTFF as a concentration step. The ability to monitor product concentration changes via the proposed dual RI approach removes the need for complex calibrations, minimal worry about changing buffer backgrounds during diafiltration, and could enable better process control during product concentration in the cGMP manufacture of biologics.</description><subject>Antibodies, Monoclonal</subject><subject>Biotechnology</subject><subject>Buffers</subject><subject>Calibration</subject><subject>Chemistry</subject><subject>Chemistry and Materials Science</subject><subject>Cyclic GMP</subject><subject>Environmental Engineering/Biotechnology</subject><subject>Error reduction</subject><subject>Food Science</subject><subject>Immunoglobulin G</subject><subject>Industrial and Production Engineering</subject><subject>Industrial Chemistry/Chemical Engineering</subject><subject>Monitoring</subject><subject>Monoclonal antibodies</subject><subject>Process control</subject><subject>Process controls</subject><subject>Proteins</subject><subject>Refractivity</subject><subject>Refractometry</subject><subject>Research Paper</subject><subject>Subtraction</subject><subject>Ultrafiltration</subject><issn>1615-7591</issn><issn>1615-7605</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2022</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><sourceid>ABUWG</sourceid><sourceid>AFKRA</sourceid><sourceid>AZQEC</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>CCPQU</sourceid><sourceid>DWQXO</sourceid><sourceid>GNUQQ</sourceid><recordid>eNp9kcFu1DAQhi1ERUvhBTggS1y4hNpOHCdHtBBAqlQk2rPl2JOVS2IvdlLRB-n7dnbTgtRDD9bYo29-65-fkHecfeKMqbPMWFW1BRMcT92URfOCnPCay0LVTL58vMuWH5PXOV8zxmUj2CtyXFZt0zaqPCF3mxhmH5a4ZNob-3ub4hIctTElsLOPgcaBJhiSwdcNUB8c_KXZb4MZ6Rypn3YpYn-KIdox7rsGBfvoblEkWAhzMgcdJPwckw9b6pZDuerOvnSIO_rr52XX0biDlc1vyNFgxgxvH-opueq-Xm6-F-cX335sPp8XtlRyLnjfCmWVcm1ft6VlQqI_YXrFJChwleAWbMlB8aEfgPHBGOaaVhkHQy0HU56Sj6sumvizQJ715LOFcTQBcCNa1FwJJVjDEf3wBL2OS0K_e6oStaikUkiJlbIp5ox707vkJ5NuNWd6H5peQ9MYmj6Ephscev8gvfQTuH8jjykhUK5A3u0XB-n_38_I3gOBBaWk</recordid><startdate>20220401</startdate><enddate>20220401</enddate><creator>Webster, Thaddaeus A.</creator><creator>Turner, Kelley</creator><creator>DuBois, Caitlin</creator><creator>MacDougall, Ryan</creator><creator>Mason, Carrie</creator><general>Springer Berlin Heidelberg</general><general>Springer Nature B.V</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7QL</scope><scope>7T7</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88A</scope><scope>88E</scope><scope>88I</scope><scope>8AO</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>8FE</scope><scope>8FH</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AEUYN</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BBNVY</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BHPHI</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>LK8</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>M1P</scope><scope>M2P</scope><scope>M7N</scope><scope>M7P</scope><scope>P64</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>Q9U</scope><scope>7X8</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2923-4711</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20220401</creationdate><title>Continuous background correction of refractive index signal to improve monoclonal antibody concentration monitoring during UF/DF and SPTFF operations</title><author>Webster, Thaddaeus A. ; Turner, Kelley ; DuBois, Caitlin ; MacDougall, Ryan ; Mason, Carrie</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c375t-1b927c77d9b693c0255822ab705e7ed421cec31e71fbfe01faa0d897adef65fa3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2022</creationdate><topic>Antibodies, Monoclonal</topic><topic>Biotechnology</topic><topic>Buffers</topic><topic>Calibration</topic><topic>Chemistry</topic><topic>Chemistry and Materials Science</topic><topic>Cyclic GMP</topic><topic>Environmental Engineering/Biotechnology</topic><topic>Error reduction</topic><topic>Food Science</topic><topic>Immunoglobulin G</topic><topic>Industrial and Production Engineering</topic><topic>Industrial Chemistry/Chemical Engineering</topic><topic>Monitoring</topic><topic>Monoclonal antibodies</topic><topic>Process control</topic><topic>Process controls</topic><topic>Proteins</topic><topic>Refractivity</topic><topic>Refractometry</topic><topic>Research Paper</topic><topic>Subtraction</topic><topic>Ultrafiltration</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Webster, Thaddaeus A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Turner, Kelley</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>DuBois, Caitlin</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>MacDougall, Ryan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mason, Carrie</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Bacteriology Abstracts (Microbiology B)</collection><collection>Industrial and Applied Microbiology Abstracts (Microbiology A)</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Biology Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Medical Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Science Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Pharma Collection</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>ProQuest SciTech Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Sustainability</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Medical Database</collection><collection>Science Database</collection><collection>Algology Mycology and Protozoology Abstracts (Microbiology C)</collection><collection>Biological Science Database</collection><collection>Biotechnology and BioEngineering Abstracts</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Bioprocess and biosystems engineering</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Webster, Thaddaeus A.</au><au>Turner, Kelley</au><au>DuBois, Caitlin</au><au>MacDougall, Ryan</au><au>Mason, Carrie</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Continuous background correction of refractive index signal to improve monoclonal antibody concentration monitoring during UF/DF and SPTFF operations</atitle><jtitle>Bioprocess and biosystems engineering</jtitle><stitle>Bioprocess Biosyst Eng</stitle><addtitle>Bioprocess Biosyst Eng</addtitle><date>2022-04-01</date><risdate>2022</risdate><volume>45</volume><issue>4</issue><spage>647</spage><epage>657</epage><pages>647-657</pages><issn>1615-7591</issn><eissn>1615-7605</eissn><abstract>Inline refractive index (RI) has the potential for monitoring protein concentration during final bulk concentration. While useful for monitoring and controlling product concentration, RI is sensitive to the respective background buffer being used for processing. This raises concerns around variations in buffer preparations, and during diafiltration where the buffer background is a mixture of different buffers during exchange. This study evaluated whether the use of a RI probe in the permeate line could facilitate continuous background subtraction (dual RI) and improve concentration monitoring during ultrafiltration/diafiltration and single pass TFF concentration for IgG1 and IgG4 antibodies. The proposed dual RI strategy yielded reductions in % error compared to the use of a single refractive index estimate from the retentate line (6.18% vs 8.63% for IgG4 and 2.65% vs 8.85% for IgG1) during traditional ultrafiltration/diafiltration. The improvement in IgG estimates were best during diafiltration where the continuous background subtraction of the permeate RI-enabled continuous monitoring of antibody material without knowledge of what the background buffer was compared to the use of a single RI estimate (6.47% vs 10.79% for IgG4 and 3.29% vs 19.59% for IgG1). In contrast minimal improvement to accuracy was obtained when using SPTFF as a concentration step. The ability to monitor product concentration changes via the proposed dual RI approach removes the need for complex calibrations, minimal worry about changing buffer backgrounds during diafiltration, and could enable better process control during product concentration in the cGMP manufacture of biologics.</abstract><cop>Berlin/Heidelberg</cop><pub>Springer Berlin Heidelberg</pub><pmid>34989873</pmid><doi>10.1007/s00449-021-02683-8</doi><tpages>11</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2923-4711</orcidid></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 1615-7591 |
ispartof | Bioprocess and biosystems engineering, 2022-04, Vol.45 (4), p.647-657 |
issn | 1615-7591 1615-7605 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2617272081 |
source | MEDLINE; SpringerLink Journals |
subjects | Antibodies, Monoclonal Biotechnology Buffers Calibration Chemistry Chemistry and Materials Science Cyclic GMP Environmental Engineering/Biotechnology Error reduction Food Science Immunoglobulin G Industrial and Production Engineering Industrial Chemistry/Chemical Engineering Monitoring Monoclonal antibodies Process control Process controls Proteins Refractivity Refractometry Research Paper Subtraction Ultrafiltration |
title | Continuous background correction of refractive index signal to improve monoclonal antibody concentration monitoring during UF/DF and SPTFF operations |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-21T05%3A48%3A38IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Continuous%20background%20correction%20of%20refractive%20index%20signal%20to%20improve%20monoclonal%20antibody%20concentration%20monitoring%20during%20UF/DF%20and%20SPTFF%20operations&rft.jtitle=Bioprocess%20and%20biosystems%20engineering&rft.au=Webster,%20Thaddaeus%20A.&rft.date=2022-04-01&rft.volume=45&rft.issue=4&rft.spage=647&rft.epage=657&rft.pages=647-657&rft.issn=1615-7591&rft.eissn=1615-7605&rft_id=info:doi/10.1007/s00449-021-02683-8&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2642624577%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2642624577&rft_id=info:pmid/34989873&rfr_iscdi=true |