Continuous background correction of refractive index signal to improve monoclonal antibody concentration monitoring during UF/DF and SPTFF operations

Inline refractive index (RI) has the potential for monitoring protein concentration during final bulk concentration. While useful for monitoring and controlling product concentration, RI is sensitive to the respective background buffer being used for processing. This raises concerns around variation...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Bioprocess and biosystems engineering 2022-04, Vol.45 (4), p.647-657
Hauptverfasser: Webster, Thaddaeus A., Turner, Kelley, DuBois, Caitlin, MacDougall, Ryan, Mason, Carrie
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 657
container_issue 4
container_start_page 647
container_title Bioprocess and biosystems engineering
container_volume 45
creator Webster, Thaddaeus A.
Turner, Kelley
DuBois, Caitlin
MacDougall, Ryan
Mason, Carrie
description Inline refractive index (RI) has the potential for monitoring protein concentration during final bulk concentration. While useful for monitoring and controlling product concentration, RI is sensitive to the respective background buffer being used for processing. This raises concerns around variations in buffer preparations, and during diafiltration where the buffer background is a mixture of different buffers during exchange. This study evaluated whether the use of a RI probe in the permeate line could facilitate continuous background subtraction (dual RI) and improve concentration monitoring during ultrafiltration/diafiltration and single pass TFF concentration for IgG1 and IgG4 antibodies. The proposed dual RI strategy yielded reductions in % error compared to the use of a single refractive index estimate from the retentate line (6.18% vs 8.63% for IgG4 and 2.65% vs 8.85% for IgG1) during traditional ultrafiltration/diafiltration. The improvement in IgG estimates were best during diafiltration where the continuous background subtraction of the permeate RI-enabled continuous monitoring of antibody material without knowledge of what the background buffer was compared to the use of a single RI estimate (6.47% vs 10.79% for IgG4 and 3.29% vs 19.59% for IgG1). In contrast minimal improvement to accuracy was obtained when using SPTFF as a concentration step. The ability to monitor product concentration changes via the proposed dual RI approach removes the need for complex calibrations, minimal worry about changing buffer backgrounds during diafiltration, and could enable better process control during product concentration in the cGMP manufacture of biologics.
doi_str_mv 10.1007/s00449-021-02683-8
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2617272081</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2642624577</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c375t-1b927c77d9b693c0255822ab705e7ed421cec31e71fbfe01faa0d897adef65fa3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kcFu1DAQhi1ERUvhBTggS1y4hNpOHCdHtBBAqlQk2rPl2JOVS2IvdlLRB-n7dnbTgtRDD9bYo29-65-fkHecfeKMqbPMWFW1BRMcT92URfOCnPCay0LVTL58vMuWH5PXOV8zxmUj2CtyXFZt0zaqPCF3mxhmH5a4ZNob-3ub4hIctTElsLOPgcaBJhiSwdcNUB8c_KXZb4MZ6Rypn3YpYn-KIdox7rsGBfvoblEkWAhzMgcdJPwckw9b6pZDuerOvnSIO_rr52XX0biDlc1vyNFgxgxvH-opueq-Xm6-F-cX335sPp8XtlRyLnjfCmWVcm1ft6VlQqI_YXrFJChwleAWbMlB8aEfgPHBGOaaVhkHQy0HU56Sj6sumvizQJ715LOFcTQBcCNa1FwJJVjDEf3wBL2OS0K_e6oStaikUkiJlbIp5ox707vkJ5NuNWd6H5peQ9MYmj6Ephscev8gvfQTuH8jjykhUK5A3u0XB-n_38_I3gOBBaWk</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2642624577</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Continuous background correction of refractive index signal to improve monoclonal antibody concentration monitoring during UF/DF and SPTFF operations</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>SpringerLink Journals</source><creator>Webster, Thaddaeus A. ; Turner, Kelley ; DuBois, Caitlin ; MacDougall, Ryan ; Mason, Carrie</creator><creatorcontrib>Webster, Thaddaeus A. ; Turner, Kelley ; DuBois, Caitlin ; MacDougall, Ryan ; Mason, Carrie</creatorcontrib><description>Inline refractive index (RI) has the potential for monitoring protein concentration during final bulk concentration. While useful for monitoring and controlling product concentration, RI is sensitive to the respective background buffer being used for processing. This raises concerns around variations in buffer preparations, and during diafiltration where the buffer background is a mixture of different buffers during exchange. This study evaluated whether the use of a RI probe in the permeate line could facilitate continuous background subtraction (dual RI) and improve concentration monitoring during ultrafiltration/diafiltration and single pass TFF concentration for IgG1 and IgG4 antibodies. The proposed dual RI strategy yielded reductions in % error compared to the use of a single refractive index estimate from the retentate line (6.18% vs 8.63% for IgG4 and 2.65% vs 8.85% for IgG1) during traditional ultrafiltration/diafiltration. The improvement in IgG estimates were best during diafiltration where the continuous background subtraction of the permeate RI-enabled continuous monitoring of antibody material without knowledge of what the background buffer was compared to the use of a single RI estimate (6.47% vs 10.79% for IgG4 and 3.29% vs 19.59% for IgG1). In contrast minimal improvement to accuracy was obtained when using SPTFF as a concentration step. The ability to monitor product concentration changes via the proposed dual RI approach removes the need for complex calibrations, minimal worry about changing buffer backgrounds during diafiltration, and could enable better process control during product concentration in the cGMP manufacture of biologics.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1615-7591</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1615-7605</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1007/s00449-021-02683-8</identifier><identifier>PMID: 34989873</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Berlin/Heidelberg: Springer Berlin Heidelberg</publisher><subject>Antibodies, Monoclonal ; Biotechnology ; Buffers ; Calibration ; Chemistry ; Chemistry and Materials Science ; Cyclic GMP ; Environmental Engineering/Biotechnology ; Error reduction ; Food Science ; Immunoglobulin G ; Industrial and Production Engineering ; Industrial Chemistry/Chemical Engineering ; Monitoring ; Monoclonal antibodies ; Process control ; Process controls ; Proteins ; Refractivity ; Refractometry ; Research Paper ; Subtraction ; Ultrafiltration</subject><ispartof>Bioprocess and biosystems engineering, 2022-04, Vol.45 (4), p.647-657</ispartof><rights>The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature 2022</rights><rights>2022. The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature.</rights><rights>The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature 2022.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c375t-1b927c77d9b693c0255822ab705e7ed421cec31e71fbfe01faa0d897adef65fa3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c375t-1b927c77d9b693c0255822ab705e7ed421cec31e71fbfe01faa0d897adef65fa3</cites><orcidid>0000-0002-2923-4711</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1007/s00449-021-02683-8$$EPDF$$P50$$Gspringer$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://link.springer.com/10.1007/s00449-021-02683-8$$EHTML$$P50$$Gspringer$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,777,781,27905,27906,41469,42538,51300</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34989873$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Webster, Thaddaeus A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Turner, Kelley</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>DuBois, Caitlin</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>MacDougall, Ryan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mason, Carrie</creatorcontrib><title>Continuous background correction of refractive index signal to improve monoclonal antibody concentration monitoring during UF/DF and SPTFF operations</title><title>Bioprocess and biosystems engineering</title><addtitle>Bioprocess Biosyst Eng</addtitle><addtitle>Bioprocess Biosyst Eng</addtitle><description>Inline refractive index (RI) has the potential for monitoring protein concentration during final bulk concentration. While useful for monitoring and controlling product concentration, RI is sensitive to the respective background buffer being used for processing. This raises concerns around variations in buffer preparations, and during diafiltration where the buffer background is a mixture of different buffers during exchange. This study evaluated whether the use of a RI probe in the permeate line could facilitate continuous background subtraction (dual RI) and improve concentration monitoring during ultrafiltration/diafiltration and single pass TFF concentration for IgG1 and IgG4 antibodies. The proposed dual RI strategy yielded reductions in % error compared to the use of a single refractive index estimate from the retentate line (6.18% vs 8.63% for IgG4 and 2.65% vs 8.85% for IgG1) during traditional ultrafiltration/diafiltration. The improvement in IgG estimates were best during diafiltration where the continuous background subtraction of the permeate RI-enabled continuous monitoring of antibody material without knowledge of what the background buffer was compared to the use of a single RI estimate (6.47% vs 10.79% for IgG4 and 3.29% vs 19.59% for IgG1). In contrast minimal improvement to accuracy was obtained when using SPTFF as a concentration step. The ability to monitor product concentration changes via the proposed dual RI approach removes the need for complex calibrations, minimal worry about changing buffer backgrounds during diafiltration, and could enable better process control during product concentration in the cGMP manufacture of biologics.</description><subject>Antibodies, Monoclonal</subject><subject>Biotechnology</subject><subject>Buffers</subject><subject>Calibration</subject><subject>Chemistry</subject><subject>Chemistry and Materials Science</subject><subject>Cyclic GMP</subject><subject>Environmental Engineering/Biotechnology</subject><subject>Error reduction</subject><subject>Food Science</subject><subject>Immunoglobulin G</subject><subject>Industrial and Production Engineering</subject><subject>Industrial Chemistry/Chemical Engineering</subject><subject>Monitoring</subject><subject>Monoclonal antibodies</subject><subject>Process control</subject><subject>Process controls</subject><subject>Proteins</subject><subject>Refractivity</subject><subject>Refractometry</subject><subject>Research Paper</subject><subject>Subtraction</subject><subject>Ultrafiltration</subject><issn>1615-7591</issn><issn>1615-7605</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2022</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><sourceid>ABUWG</sourceid><sourceid>AFKRA</sourceid><sourceid>AZQEC</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>CCPQU</sourceid><sourceid>DWQXO</sourceid><sourceid>GNUQQ</sourceid><recordid>eNp9kcFu1DAQhi1ERUvhBTggS1y4hNpOHCdHtBBAqlQk2rPl2JOVS2IvdlLRB-n7dnbTgtRDD9bYo29-65-fkHecfeKMqbPMWFW1BRMcT92URfOCnPCay0LVTL58vMuWH5PXOV8zxmUj2CtyXFZt0zaqPCF3mxhmH5a4ZNob-3ub4hIctTElsLOPgcaBJhiSwdcNUB8c_KXZb4MZ6Rypn3YpYn-KIdox7rsGBfvoblEkWAhzMgcdJPwckw9b6pZDuerOvnSIO_rr52XX0biDlc1vyNFgxgxvH-opueq-Xm6-F-cX335sPp8XtlRyLnjfCmWVcm1ft6VlQqI_YXrFJChwleAWbMlB8aEfgPHBGOaaVhkHQy0HU56Sj6sumvizQJ715LOFcTQBcCNa1FwJJVjDEf3wBL2OS0K_e6oStaikUkiJlbIp5ox707vkJ5NuNWd6H5peQ9MYmj6Ephscev8gvfQTuH8jjykhUK5A3u0XB-n_38_I3gOBBaWk</recordid><startdate>20220401</startdate><enddate>20220401</enddate><creator>Webster, Thaddaeus A.</creator><creator>Turner, Kelley</creator><creator>DuBois, Caitlin</creator><creator>MacDougall, Ryan</creator><creator>Mason, Carrie</creator><general>Springer Berlin Heidelberg</general><general>Springer Nature B.V</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7QL</scope><scope>7T7</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88A</scope><scope>88E</scope><scope>88I</scope><scope>8AO</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>8FE</scope><scope>8FH</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AEUYN</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BBNVY</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BHPHI</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>LK8</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>M1P</scope><scope>M2P</scope><scope>M7N</scope><scope>M7P</scope><scope>P64</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>Q9U</scope><scope>7X8</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2923-4711</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20220401</creationdate><title>Continuous background correction of refractive index signal to improve monoclonal antibody concentration monitoring during UF/DF and SPTFF operations</title><author>Webster, Thaddaeus A. ; Turner, Kelley ; DuBois, Caitlin ; MacDougall, Ryan ; Mason, Carrie</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c375t-1b927c77d9b693c0255822ab705e7ed421cec31e71fbfe01faa0d897adef65fa3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2022</creationdate><topic>Antibodies, Monoclonal</topic><topic>Biotechnology</topic><topic>Buffers</topic><topic>Calibration</topic><topic>Chemistry</topic><topic>Chemistry and Materials Science</topic><topic>Cyclic GMP</topic><topic>Environmental Engineering/Biotechnology</topic><topic>Error reduction</topic><topic>Food Science</topic><topic>Immunoglobulin G</topic><topic>Industrial and Production Engineering</topic><topic>Industrial Chemistry/Chemical Engineering</topic><topic>Monitoring</topic><topic>Monoclonal antibodies</topic><topic>Process control</topic><topic>Process controls</topic><topic>Proteins</topic><topic>Refractivity</topic><topic>Refractometry</topic><topic>Research Paper</topic><topic>Subtraction</topic><topic>Ultrafiltration</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Webster, Thaddaeus A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Turner, Kelley</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>DuBois, Caitlin</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>MacDougall, Ryan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mason, Carrie</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Bacteriology Abstracts (Microbiology B)</collection><collection>Industrial and Applied Microbiology Abstracts (Microbiology A)</collection><collection>Health &amp; Medical Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Biology Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Medical Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Science Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Pharma Collection</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>ProQuest SciTech Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Sustainability</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Health &amp; Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>Health &amp; Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Medical Database</collection><collection>Science Database</collection><collection>Algology Mycology and Protozoology Abstracts (Microbiology C)</collection><collection>Biological Science Database</collection><collection>Biotechnology and BioEngineering Abstracts</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Bioprocess and biosystems engineering</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Webster, Thaddaeus A.</au><au>Turner, Kelley</au><au>DuBois, Caitlin</au><au>MacDougall, Ryan</au><au>Mason, Carrie</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Continuous background correction of refractive index signal to improve monoclonal antibody concentration monitoring during UF/DF and SPTFF operations</atitle><jtitle>Bioprocess and biosystems engineering</jtitle><stitle>Bioprocess Biosyst Eng</stitle><addtitle>Bioprocess Biosyst Eng</addtitle><date>2022-04-01</date><risdate>2022</risdate><volume>45</volume><issue>4</issue><spage>647</spage><epage>657</epage><pages>647-657</pages><issn>1615-7591</issn><eissn>1615-7605</eissn><abstract>Inline refractive index (RI) has the potential for monitoring protein concentration during final bulk concentration. While useful for monitoring and controlling product concentration, RI is sensitive to the respective background buffer being used for processing. This raises concerns around variations in buffer preparations, and during diafiltration where the buffer background is a mixture of different buffers during exchange. This study evaluated whether the use of a RI probe in the permeate line could facilitate continuous background subtraction (dual RI) and improve concentration monitoring during ultrafiltration/diafiltration and single pass TFF concentration for IgG1 and IgG4 antibodies. The proposed dual RI strategy yielded reductions in % error compared to the use of a single refractive index estimate from the retentate line (6.18% vs 8.63% for IgG4 and 2.65% vs 8.85% for IgG1) during traditional ultrafiltration/diafiltration. The improvement in IgG estimates were best during diafiltration where the continuous background subtraction of the permeate RI-enabled continuous monitoring of antibody material without knowledge of what the background buffer was compared to the use of a single RI estimate (6.47% vs 10.79% for IgG4 and 3.29% vs 19.59% for IgG1). In contrast minimal improvement to accuracy was obtained when using SPTFF as a concentration step. The ability to monitor product concentration changes via the proposed dual RI approach removes the need for complex calibrations, minimal worry about changing buffer backgrounds during diafiltration, and could enable better process control during product concentration in the cGMP manufacture of biologics.</abstract><cop>Berlin/Heidelberg</cop><pub>Springer Berlin Heidelberg</pub><pmid>34989873</pmid><doi>10.1007/s00449-021-02683-8</doi><tpages>11</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2923-4711</orcidid></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 1615-7591
ispartof Bioprocess and biosystems engineering, 2022-04, Vol.45 (4), p.647-657
issn 1615-7591
1615-7605
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2617272081
source MEDLINE; SpringerLink Journals
subjects Antibodies, Monoclonal
Biotechnology
Buffers
Calibration
Chemistry
Chemistry and Materials Science
Cyclic GMP
Environmental Engineering/Biotechnology
Error reduction
Food Science
Immunoglobulin G
Industrial and Production Engineering
Industrial Chemistry/Chemical Engineering
Monitoring
Monoclonal antibodies
Process control
Process controls
Proteins
Refractivity
Refractometry
Research Paper
Subtraction
Ultrafiltration
title Continuous background correction of refractive index signal to improve monoclonal antibody concentration monitoring during UF/DF and SPTFF operations
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-21T05%3A48%3A38IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Continuous%20background%20correction%20of%20refractive%20index%20signal%20to%20improve%20monoclonal%20antibody%20concentration%20monitoring%20during%20UF/DF%20and%20SPTFF%20operations&rft.jtitle=Bioprocess%20and%20biosystems%20engineering&rft.au=Webster,%20Thaddaeus%20A.&rft.date=2022-04-01&rft.volume=45&rft.issue=4&rft.spage=647&rft.epage=657&rft.pages=647-657&rft.issn=1615-7591&rft.eissn=1615-7605&rft_id=info:doi/10.1007/s00449-021-02683-8&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2642624577%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2642624577&rft_id=info:pmid/34989873&rfr_iscdi=true