Recurrence and survival after laparoscopy versus laparotomy without lymphadenectomy in early-stage endometrial cancer: Long-term outcomes of a randomised trial

Laparoscopic hysterectomy is accepted worldwide as the standard treatment option for early-stage endometrial cancer. However, there are limited data on long-term survival, particularly when no lymphadenectomy is performed. We compared the survival outcomes of total laparoscopic hysterectomy (TLH) an...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Gynecologic oncology 2022-02, Vol.164 (2), p.265-270
Hauptverfasser: Reijntjes, Bianca, van Suijlichem, Mieke, Woolderink, Jorien M., Bongers, Marlies Y., Reesink-Peters, Nathalie, Paulsen, Lasse, van der Hurk, Pieter J., Kraayenbrink, Arjan A., Apperloo, Mirjam J.A., Slangen, Brigitte, Schukken, Tineke, Tummers, Fokkedien H.M.P., van Kesteren, Paul J.M., Huirne, Judith A.F., Boskamp, Dieuwke, Lunter, Gerton, de Bock, Geertruida H., Mourits, Marian J.E.
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 270
container_issue 2
container_start_page 265
container_title Gynecologic oncology
container_volume 164
creator Reijntjes, Bianca
van Suijlichem, Mieke
Woolderink, Jorien M.
Bongers, Marlies Y.
Reesink-Peters, Nathalie
Paulsen, Lasse
van der Hurk, Pieter J.
Kraayenbrink, Arjan A.
Apperloo, Mirjam J.A.
Slangen, Brigitte
Schukken, Tineke
Tummers, Fokkedien H.M.P.
van Kesteren, Paul J.M.
Huirne, Judith A.F.
Boskamp, Dieuwke
Lunter, Gerton
de Bock, Geertruida H.
Mourits, Marian J.E.
description Laparoscopic hysterectomy is accepted worldwide as the standard treatment option for early-stage endometrial cancer. However, there are limited data on long-term survival, particularly when no lymphadenectomy is performed. We compared the survival outcomes of total laparoscopic hysterectomy (TLH) and total abdominal hysterectomy (TAH), both without lymphadenectomy, for early-stage endometrial cancer up to 5 years postoperatively. Follow-up of a multi-centre, randomised controlled trial comparing TLH and TAH, without routine lymphadenectomy, for women with stage I endometrial cancer. Enrolment was between 2007 and 2009 by 2:1 randomisation to TLH or TAH. Outcomes were disease-free survival (DFS), overall survival (OS), disease-specific survival (DSS), and primary site of recurrence. Multivariable Cox regression analyses were adjusted for age, stage, grade, and radiotherapy with adjusted hazard ratios (aHR) and 95% confidence intervals (95%CI) reported. To test for significance, non-inferiority margins were defined. In total, 279 women underwent a surgical procedure, of whom 263 (94%) had follow-up data. For the TLH (n = 175) and TAH (n = 88) groups, DFS (90.3% vs 84.1%; aHR[recurrence], 0.69; 95%CI, 0.31–1.52), OS (89.2% vs 82.8%; aHR[death], 0.60; 95%CI, 0.30–1.19), and DSS (95.0% vs 89.8%; aHR[death], 0.62; 95%CI, 0.23–1.70) were reported at 5 years. At a 10% significance level, and with a non-inferiority margin of 0.20, the null hypothesis of inferiority was rejected for all three outcomes. There were no port-site or wound metastases, and local recurrence rates were comparable. Disease recurrence and 5-year survival rates were comparable between the TLH and TAH groups and comparable to studies with lymphadenectomy, supporting the widespread use of TLH without lymphadenectomy as the primary treatment for early-stage, low-grade endometrial cancer. •Long-term outcomes of TLH vs TAH without lymphadenectomy in early EC are reported.•There were no significant differences in DFS, OS and DSS, 5 years postoperatively.•No port-site or wound metastases were found after TLH or TAH.•Our findings support the widespread use of TLH without lymphadenectomy for early EC.
doi_str_mv 10.1016/j.ygyno.2021.12.019
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2614757214</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S0090825821016760</els_id><sourcerecordid>2614757214</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c404t-24a090edd5f12f583a5ff02dd85c2b6ff7727d0d80e3d8fc50fe95f41c8c2413</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kd1q3DAQhUVoSDZpniBQdNkbuyPZWtuFXpSQP1gIlL0XWmm00WJbrmRv8dP0Vav9aS97JRidM2dmPkLuGeQM2PLLLp-3c-9zDpzljOfAmguyYNCIbFmL5gNZADSQ1VzU1-Qmxh0AFMD4FbkuykYIXlQL8vsH6ikE7DVS1Rsap7B3e9VSZUcMtFWDCj5qP8x0jyFO8VwafTfTX25899NI27kb3pXBHvWx7nqKKrRzFke1RYq98R2OwaW2WqWk8JWufL_NUkJHUwOdviP1lioa1EHsIhp6NHwkl1a1Ee_O7y1ZPz2uH16y1dvz68P3VaZLKMeMlyrtisYIy7gVdaGEtcCNqYXmm6W1VcUrA6YGLExttQCLjbAl07XmJStuyedT2yH4nxPGUaYZNLat6tFPUfIlKytRcVYmaXGS6nSYGNDKIbhOhVkykAcwciePYOQBjGRcJjDJ9ekcMG06NP88f0kkwbeTANOWe4dBRu0OWIwL6azSePffgD8opKWy</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2614757214</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Recurrence and survival after laparoscopy versus laparotomy without lymphadenectomy in early-stage endometrial cancer: Long-term outcomes of a randomised trial</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Access via ScienceDirect (Elsevier)</source><creator>Reijntjes, Bianca ; van Suijlichem, Mieke ; Woolderink, Jorien M. ; Bongers, Marlies Y. ; Reesink-Peters, Nathalie ; Paulsen, Lasse ; van der Hurk, Pieter J. ; Kraayenbrink, Arjan A. ; Apperloo, Mirjam J.A. ; Slangen, Brigitte ; Schukken, Tineke ; Tummers, Fokkedien H.M.P. ; van Kesteren, Paul J.M. ; Huirne, Judith A.F. ; Boskamp, Dieuwke ; Lunter, Gerton ; de Bock, Geertruida H. ; Mourits, Marian J.E.</creator><creatorcontrib>Reijntjes, Bianca ; van Suijlichem, Mieke ; Woolderink, Jorien M. ; Bongers, Marlies Y. ; Reesink-Peters, Nathalie ; Paulsen, Lasse ; van der Hurk, Pieter J. ; Kraayenbrink, Arjan A. ; Apperloo, Mirjam J.A. ; Slangen, Brigitte ; Schukken, Tineke ; Tummers, Fokkedien H.M.P. ; van Kesteren, Paul J.M. ; Huirne, Judith A.F. ; Boskamp, Dieuwke ; Lunter, Gerton ; de Bock, Geertruida H. ; Mourits, Marian J.E.</creatorcontrib><description>Laparoscopic hysterectomy is accepted worldwide as the standard treatment option for early-stage endometrial cancer. However, there are limited data on long-term survival, particularly when no lymphadenectomy is performed. We compared the survival outcomes of total laparoscopic hysterectomy (TLH) and total abdominal hysterectomy (TAH), both without lymphadenectomy, for early-stage endometrial cancer up to 5 years postoperatively. Follow-up of a multi-centre, randomised controlled trial comparing TLH and TAH, without routine lymphadenectomy, for women with stage I endometrial cancer. Enrolment was between 2007 and 2009 by 2:1 randomisation to TLH or TAH. Outcomes were disease-free survival (DFS), overall survival (OS), disease-specific survival (DSS), and primary site of recurrence. Multivariable Cox regression analyses were adjusted for age, stage, grade, and radiotherapy with adjusted hazard ratios (aHR) and 95% confidence intervals (95%CI) reported. To test for significance, non-inferiority margins were defined. In total, 279 women underwent a surgical procedure, of whom 263 (94%) had follow-up data. For the TLH (n = 175) and TAH (n = 88) groups, DFS (90.3% vs 84.1%; aHR[recurrence], 0.69; 95%CI, 0.31–1.52), OS (89.2% vs 82.8%; aHR[death], 0.60; 95%CI, 0.30–1.19), and DSS (95.0% vs 89.8%; aHR[death], 0.62; 95%CI, 0.23–1.70) were reported at 5 years. At a 10% significance level, and with a non-inferiority margin of 0.20, the null hypothesis of inferiority was rejected for all three outcomes. There were no port-site or wound metastases, and local recurrence rates were comparable. Disease recurrence and 5-year survival rates were comparable between the TLH and TAH groups and comparable to studies with lymphadenectomy, supporting the widespread use of TLH without lymphadenectomy as the primary treatment for early-stage, low-grade endometrial cancer. •Long-term outcomes of TLH vs TAH without lymphadenectomy in early EC are reported.•There were no significant differences in DFS, OS and DSS, 5 years postoperatively.•No port-site or wound metastases were found after TLH or TAH.•Our findings support the widespread use of TLH without lymphadenectomy for early EC.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0090-8258</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1095-6859</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.ygyno.2021.12.019</identifier><identifier>PMID: 34955237</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>United States: Elsevier Inc</publisher><subject>Adult ; Aged ; Aged, 80 and over ; Carcinoma, Endometrioid - mortality ; Carcinoma, Endometrioid - pathology ; Carcinoma, Endometrioid - surgery ; Disease-Free Survival ; Endometrial cancer ; Endometrial Neoplasms - mortality ; Endometrial Neoplasms - pathology ; Endometrial Neoplasms - surgery ; Female ; Humans ; Hysterectomy ; Hysterectomy - methods ; Laparoscopic surgery ; Laparoscopy - methods ; Laparotomy ; Laparotomy - methods ; Lymph Node Excision ; Lymphadenectomy ; Middle Aged ; Neoplasm Grading ; Neoplasm Recurrence, Local - epidemiology ; Neoplasm Staging ; Radiotherapy, Adjuvant ; Recurrence ; Survival</subject><ispartof>Gynecologic oncology, 2022-02, Vol.164 (2), p.265-270</ispartof><rights>2021 Elsevier Inc.</rights><rights>Copyright © 2021 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c404t-24a090edd5f12f583a5ff02dd85c2b6ff7727d0d80e3d8fc50fe95f41c8c2413</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c404t-24a090edd5f12f583a5ff02dd85c2b6ff7727d0d80e3d8fc50fe95f41c8c2413</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ygyno.2021.12.019$$EHTML$$P50$$Gelsevier$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,3550,27924,27925,45995</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34955237$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Reijntjes, Bianca</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>van Suijlichem, Mieke</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Woolderink, Jorien M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bongers, Marlies Y.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Reesink-Peters, Nathalie</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Paulsen, Lasse</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>van der Hurk, Pieter J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kraayenbrink, Arjan A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Apperloo, Mirjam J.A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Slangen, Brigitte</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Schukken, Tineke</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Tummers, Fokkedien H.M.P.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>van Kesteren, Paul J.M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Huirne, Judith A.F.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Boskamp, Dieuwke</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lunter, Gerton</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>de Bock, Geertruida H.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mourits, Marian J.E.</creatorcontrib><title>Recurrence and survival after laparoscopy versus laparotomy without lymphadenectomy in early-stage endometrial cancer: Long-term outcomes of a randomised trial</title><title>Gynecologic oncology</title><addtitle>Gynecol Oncol</addtitle><description>Laparoscopic hysterectomy is accepted worldwide as the standard treatment option for early-stage endometrial cancer. However, there are limited data on long-term survival, particularly when no lymphadenectomy is performed. We compared the survival outcomes of total laparoscopic hysterectomy (TLH) and total abdominal hysterectomy (TAH), both without lymphadenectomy, for early-stage endometrial cancer up to 5 years postoperatively. Follow-up of a multi-centre, randomised controlled trial comparing TLH and TAH, without routine lymphadenectomy, for women with stage I endometrial cancer. Enrolment was between 2007 and 2009 by 2:1 randomisation to TLH or TAH. Outcomes were disease-free survival (DFS), overall survival (OS), disease-specific survival (DSS), and primary site of recurrence. Multivariable Cox regression analyses were adjusted for age, stage, grade, and radiotherapy with adjusted hazard ratios (aHR) and 95% confidence intervals (95%CI) reported. To test for significance, non-inferiority margins were defined. In total, 279 women underwent a surgical procedure, of whom 263 (94%) had follow-up data. For the TLH (n = 175) and TAH (n = 88) groups, DFS (90.3% vs 84.1%; aHR[recurrence], 0.69; 95%CI, 0.31–1.52), OS (89.2% vs 82.8%; aHR[death], 0.60; 95%CI, 0.30–1.19), and DSS (95.0% vs 89.8%; aHR[death], 0.62; 95%CI, 0.23–1.70) were reported at 5 years. At a 10% significance level, and with a non-inferiority margin of 0.20, the null hypothesis of inferiority was rejected for all three outcomes. There were no port-site or wound metastases, and local recurrence rates were comparable. Disease recurrence and 5-year survival rates were comparable between the TLH and TAH groups and comparable to studies with lymphadenectomy, supporting the widespread use of TLH without lymphadenectomy as the primary treatment for early-stage, low-grade endometrial cancer. •Long-term outcomes of TLH vs TAH without lymphadenectomy in early EC are reported.•There were no significant differences in DFS, OS and DSS, 5 years postoperatively.•No port-site or wound metastases were found after TLH or TAH.•Our findings support the widespread use of TLH without lymphadenectomy for early EC.</description><subject>Adult</subject><subject>Aged</subject><subject>Aged, 80 and over</subject><subject>Carcinoma, Endometrioid - mortality</subject><subject>Carcinoma, Endometrioid - pathology</subject><subject>Carcinoma, Endometrioid - surgery</subject><subject>Disease-Free Survival</subject><subject>Endometrial cancer</subject><subject>Endometrial Neoplasms - mortality</subject><subject>Endometrial Neoplasms - pathology</subject><subject>Endometrial Neoplasms - surgery</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Hysterectomy</subject><subject>Hysterectomy - methods</subject><subject>Laparoscopic surgery</subject><subject>Laparoscopy - methods</subject><subject>Laparotomy</subject><subject>Laparotomy - methods</subject><subject>Lymph Node Excision</subject><subject>Lymphadenectomy</subject><subject>Middle Aged</subject><subject>Neoplasm Grading</subject><subject>Neoplasm Recurrence, Local - epidemiology</subject><subject>Neoplasm Staging</subject><subject>Radiotherapy, Adjuvant</subject><subject>Recurrence</subject><subject>Survival</subject><issn>0090-8258</issn><issn>1095-6859</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2022</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNp9kd1q3DAQhUVoSDZpniBQdNkbuyPZWtuFXpSQP1gIlL0XWmm00WJbrmRv8dP0Vav9aS97JRidM2dmPkLuGeQM2PLLLp-3c-9zDpzljOfAmguyYNCIbFmL5gNZADSQ1VzU1-Qmxh0AFMD4FbkuykYIXlQL8vsH6ikE7DVS1Rsap7B3e9VSZUcMtFWDCj5qP8x0jyFO8VwafTfTX25899NI27kb3pXBHvWx7nqKKrRzFke1RYq98R2OwaW2WqWk8JWufL_NUkJHUwOdviP1lioa1EHsIhp6NHwkl1a1Ee_O7y1ZPz2uH16y1dvz68P3VaZLKMeMlyrtisYIy7gVdaGEtcCNqYXmm6W1VcUrA6YGLExttQCLjbAl07XmJStuyedT2yH4nxPGUaYZNLat6tFPUfIlKytRcVYmaXGS6nSYGNDKIbhOhVkykAcwciePYOQBjGRcJjDJ9ekcMG06NP88f0kkwbeTANOWe4dBRu0OWIwL6azSePffgD8opKWy</recordid><startdate>202202</startdate><enddate>202202</enddate><creator>Reijntjes, Bianca</creator><creator>van Suijlichem, Mieke</creator><creator>Woolderink, Jorien M.</creator><creator>Bongers, Marlies Y.</creator><creator>Reesink-Peters, Nathalie</creator><creator>Paulsen, Lasse</creator><creator>van der Hurk, Pieter J.</creator><creator>Kraayenbrink, Arjan A.</creator><creator>Apperloo, Mirjam J.A.</creator><creator>Slangen, Brigitte</creator><creator>Schukken, Tineke</creator><creator>Tummers, Fokkedien H.M.P.</creator><creator>van Kesteren, Paul J.M.</creator><creator>Huirne, Judith A.F.</creator><creator>Boskamp, Dieuwke</creator><creator>Lunter, Gerton</creator><creator>de Bock, Geertruida H.</creator><creator>Mourits, Marian J.E.</creator><general>Elsevier Inc</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>202202</creationdate><title>Recurrence and survival after laparoscopy versus laparotomy without lymphadenectomy in early-stage endometrial cancer: Long-term outcomes of a randomised trial</title><author>Reijntjes, Bianca ; van Suijlichem, Mieke ; Woolderink, Jorien M. ; Bongers, Marlies Y. ; Reesink-Peters, Nathalie ; Paulsen, Lasse ; van der Hurk, Pieter J. ; Kraayenbrink, Arjan A. ; Apperloo, Mirjam J.A. ; Slangen, Brigitte ; Schukken, Tineke ; Tummers, Fokkedien H.M.P. ; van Kesteren, Paul J.M. ; Huirne, Judith A.F. ; Boskamp, Dieuwke ; Lunter, Gerton ; de Bock, Geertruida H. ; Mourits, Marian J.E.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c404t-24a090edd5f12f583a5ff02dd85c2b6ff7727d0d80e3d8fc50fe95f41c8c2413</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2022</creationdate><topic>Adult</topic><topic>Aged</topic><topic>Aged, 80 and over</topic><topic>Carcinoma, Endometrioid - mortality</topic><topic>Carcinoma, Endometrioid - pathology</topic><topic>Carcinoma, Endometrioid - surgery</topic><topic>Disease-Free Survival</topic><topic>Endometrial cancer</topic><topic>Endometrial Neoplasms - mortality</topic><topic>Endometrial Neoplasms - pathology</topic><topic>Endometrial Neoplasms - surgery</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Hysterectomy</topic><topic>Hysterectomy - methods</topic><topic>Laparoscopic surgery</topic><topic>Laparoscopy - methods</topic><topic>Laparotomy</topic><topic>Laparotomy - methods</topic><topic>Lymph Node Excision</topic><topic>Lymphadenectomy</topic><topic>Middle Aged</topic><topic>Neoplasm Grading</topic><topic>Neoplasm Recurrence, Local - epidemiology</topic><topic>Neoplasm Staging</topic><topic>Radiotherapy, Adjuvant</topic><topic>Recurrence</topic><topic>Survival</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Reijntjes, Bianca</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>van Suijlichem, Mieke</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Woolderink, Jorien M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bongers, Marlies Y.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Reesink-Peters, Nathalie</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Paulsen, Lasse</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>van der Hurk, Pieter J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kraayenbrink, Arjan A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Apperloo, Mirjam J.A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Slangen, Brigitte</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Schukken, Tineke</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Tummers, Fokkedien H.M.P.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>van Kesteren, Paul J.M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Huirne, Judith A.F.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Boskamp, Dieuwke</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lunter, Gerton</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>de Bock, Geertruida H.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mourits, Marian J.E.</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Gynecologic oncology</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Reijntjes, Bianca</au><au>van Suijlichem, Mieke</au><au>Woolderink, Jorien M.</au><au>Bongers, Marlies Y.</au><au>Reesink-Peters, Nathalie</au><au>Paulsen, Lasse</au><au>van der Hurk, Pieter J.</au><au>Kraayenbrink, Arjan A.</au><au>Apperloo, Mirjam J.A.</au><au>Slangen, Brigitte</au><au>Schukken, Tineke</au><au>Tummers, Fokkedien H.M.P.</au><au>van Kesteren, Paul J.M.</au><au>Huirne, Judith A.F.</au><au>Boskamp, Dieuwke</au><au>Lunter, Gerton</au><au>de Bock, Geertruida H.</au><au>Mourits, Marian J.E.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Recurrence and survival after laparoscopy versus laparotomy without lymphadenectomy in early-stage endometrial cancer: Long-term outcomes of a randomised trial</atitle><jtitle>Gynecologic oncology</jtitle><addtitle>Gynecol Oncol</addtitle><date>2022-02</date><risdate>2022</risdate><volume>164</volume><issue>2</issue><spage>265</spage><epage>270</epage><pages>265-270</pages><issn>0090-8258</issn><eissn>1095-6859</eissn><abstract>Laparoscopic hysterectomy is accepted worldwide as the standard treatment option for early-stage endometrial cancer. However, there are limited data on long-term survival, particularly when no lymphadenectomy is performed. We compared the survival outcomes of total laparoscopic hysterectomy (TLH) and total abdominal hysterectomy (TAH), both without lymphadenectomy, for early-stage endometrial cancer up to 5 years postoperatively. Follow-up of a multi-centre, randomised controlled trial comparing TLH and TAH, without routine lymphadenectomy, for women with stage I endometrial cancer. Enrolment was between 2007 and 2009 by 2:1 randomisation to TLH or TAH. Outcomes were disease-free survival (DFS), overall survival (OS), disease-specific survival (DSS), and primary site of recurrence. Multivariable Cox regression analyses were adjusted for age, stage, grade, and radiotherapy with adjusted hazard ratios (aHR) and 95% confidence intervals (95%CI) reported. To test for significance, non-inferiority margins were defined. In total, 279 women underwent a surgical procedure, of whom 263 (94%) had follow-up data. For the TLH (n = 175) and TAH (n = 88) groups, DFS (90.3% vs 84.1%; aHR[recurrence], 0.69; 95%CI, 0.31–1.52), OS (89.2% vs 82.8%; aHR[death], 0.60; 95%CI, 0.30–1.19), and DSS (95.0% vs 89.8%; aHR[death], 0.62; 95%CI, 0.23–1.70) were reported at 5 years. At a 10% significance level, and with a non-inferiority margin of 0.20, the null hypothesis of inferiority was rejected for all three outcomes. There were no port-site or wound metastases, and local recurrence rates were comparable. Disease recurrence and 5-year survival rates were comparable between the TLH and TAH groups and comparable to studies with lymphadenectomy, supporting the widespread use of TLH without lymphadenectomy as the primary treatment for early-stage, low-grade endometrial cancer. •Long-term outcomes of TLH vs TAH without lymphadenectomy in early EC are reported.•There were no significant differences in DFS, OS and DSS, 5 years postoperatively.•No port-site or wound metastases were found after TLH or TAH.•Our findings support the widespread use of TLH without lymphadenectomy for early EC.</abstract><cop>United States</cop><pub>Elsevier Inc</pub><pmid>34955237</pmid><doi>10.1016/j.ygyno.2021.12.019</doi><tpages>6</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0090-8258
ispartof Gynecologic oncology, 2022-02, Vol.164 (2), p.265-270
issn 0090-8258
1095-6859
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2614757214
source MEDLINE; Access via ScienceDirect (Elsevier)
subjects Adult
Aged
Aged, 80 and over
Carcinoma, Endometrioid - mortality
Carcinoma, Endometrioid - pathology
Carcinoma, Endometrioid - surgery
Disease-Free Survival
Endometrial cancer
Endometrial Neoplasms - mortality
Endometrial Neoplasms - pathology
Endometrial Neoplasms - surgery
Female
Humans
Hysterectomy
Hysterectomy - methods
Laparoscopic surgery
Laparoscopy - methods
Laparotomy
Laparotomy - methods
Lymph Node Excision
Lymphadenectomy
Middle Aged
Neoplasm Grading
Neoplasm Recurrence, Local - epidemiology
Neoplasm Staging
Radiotherapy, Adjuvant
Recurrence
Survival
title Recurrence and survival after laparoscopy versus laparotomy without lymphadenectomy in early-stage endometrial cancer: Long-term outcomes of a randomised trial
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-22T06%3A49%3A40IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Recurrence%20and%20survival%20after%20laparoscopy%20versus%20laparotomy%20without%20lymphadenectomy%20in%20early-stage%20endometrial%20cancer:%20Long-term%20outcomes%20of%20a%20randomised%20trial&rft.jtitle=Gynecologic%20oncology&rft.au=Reijntjes,%20Bianca&rft.date=2022-02&rft.volume=164&rft.issue=2&rft.spage=265&rft.epage=270&rft.pages=265-270&rft.issn=0090-8258&rft.eissn=1095-6859&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.ygyno.2021.12.019&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2614757214%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2614757214&rft_id=info:pmid/34955237&rft_els_id=S0090825821016760&rfr_iscdi=true