Oral Versus Intravenous Antibiotics for Residual Osteomyelitis After Amputation in the Diabetic Foot
The standard management for residual osteomyelitis following amputation in a diabetic foot infection includes a prolonged course of intravenous antibiotic agents. The purpose of this analysis was to investigate whether oral antibiotic therapy led to treatment failure more than intravenous antibiotic...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | The Journal of foot and ankle surgery 2022-07, Vol.61 (4), p.735-738 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 738 |
---|---|
container_issue | 4 |
container_start_page | 735 |
container_title | The Journal of foot and ankle surgery |
container_volume | 61 |
creator | Gill, Ankurpreet Singh Gorski, Matthew Strage, Katya Eve Dunn, Jason Tyler Jerabek, Morgan Hoffman, Kristine Marie |
description | The standard management for residual osteomyelitis following amputation in a diabetic foot infection includes a prolonged course of intravenous antibiotic agents. The purpose of this analysis was to investigate whether oral antibiotic therapy led to treatment failure more than intravenous antibiotic therapy for this indication. The primary endpoint was treatment failure within one year of the initial amputation, defined by re-operation for residual osteomyelitic infection or a remaining nonhealing wound at the surgical site. All patients received at least 4 weeks of antibiotics and were chosen for oral or intravenous route of administration by infectious disease specialists. Characteristics including age, sex, hemoglobin A1c, BMI, tobacco use, PVD, homelessness and IDSA classification were also assessed for influence on antibiotic success and failure. Of the 65 patients meeting inclusion criteria, treatment failure occurred in 32 and treatment success occurred in 33. Of the treatment failures, 17 (53%) were in the intravenous group, and 15 (47%) were in the oral group. The differences between the modalities of antibiotic administration and their failure rates were not found to be statistically significant (p = .28 (proportional difference: -14%, 95% confidence interval [CI]:−36% to 10%)). |
doi_str_mv | 10.1053/j.jfas.2021.11.006 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2614755427</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S1067251621004592</els_id><sourcerecordid>2614755427</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c356t-e7f6b42e7feaf4f4519b7a9bcb560856d3068bbc1f88d3a2e9e9165b9705a5f53</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kEtLxDAUhYMovv-AC8nSTWuSNmkLbgbfIAyIug1JeoMZ2mZMUsF_b4ZRl67uWXznwP0QOqOkpIRXl6tyZVUsGWG0pLQkROygQ8prVjDG6t2ciWgKxqk4QEcxrghhrGv5Pjqo6o5XQrSHqF8GNeA3CHGO-HFKQX3C5HNeTMlp55MzEVsf8DNE18-ZXcYEfvyCwSWXMZsg4MW4npNKzk_YTTi9A75xSkMu4zvv0wnas2qIcPpzj9Hr3e3L9UPxtLx_vF48FabiIhXQWKFrlg8oW9ua0043qtNGc0FaLvqKiFZrQ23b9pVi0EFHBdddQ7jillfH6GK7uw7-Y4aY5OiigWFQE-SfJBO0bngW1GSUbVETfIwBrFwHN6rwJSmRG7tyJTd25caupFRmu7l0_rM_6xH6v8qvzgxcbQHIX346CDIaB5OB3gUwSfbe_bf_DaX7jLE</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2614755427</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Oral Versus Intravenous Antibiotics for Residual Osteomyelitis After Amputation in the Diabetic Foot</title><source>Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals</source><creator>Gill, Ankurpreet Singh ; Gorski, Matthew ; Strage, Katya Eve ; Dunn, Jason Tyler ; Jerabek, Morgan ; Hoffman, Kristine Marie</creator><creatorcontrib>Gill, Ankurpreet Singh ; Gorski, Matthew ; Strage, Katya Eve ; Dunn, Jason Tyler ; Jerabek, Morgan ; Hoffman, Kristine Marie</creatorcontrib><description>The standard management for residual osteomyelitis following amputation in a diabetic foot infection includes a prolonged course of intravenous antibiotic agents. The purpose of this analysis was to investigate whether oral antibiotic therapy led to treatment failure more than intravenous antibiotic therapy for this indication. The primary endpoint was treatment failure within one year of the initial amputation, defined by re-operation for residual osteomyelitic infection or a remaining nonhealing wound at the surgical site. All patients received at least 4 weeks of antibiotics and were chosen for oral or intravenous route of administration by infectious disease specialists. Characteristics including age, sex, hemoglobin A1c, BMI, tobacco use, PVD, homelessness and IDSA classification were also assessed for influence on antibiotic success and failure. Of the 65 patients meeting inclusion criteria, treatment failure occurred in 32 and treatment success occurred in 33. Of the treatment failures, 17 (53%) were in the intravenous group, and 15 (47%) were in the oral group. The differences between the modalities of antibiotic administration and their failure rates were not found to be statistically significant (p = .28 (proportional difference: -14%, 95% confidence interval [CI]:−36% to 10%)).</description><identifier>ISSN: 1067-2516</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1542-2224</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1053/j.jfas.2021.11.006</identifier><identifier>PMID: 34953668</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>United States: Elsevier Inc</publisher><subject>antibiotic failure ; diabetic foot infection ; infectious disease ; osteomyelitis ; positive margins</subject><ispartof>The Journal of foot and ankle surgery, 2022-07, Vol.61 (4), p.735-738</ispartof><rights>2021 the American College of Foot and Ankle Surgeons</rights><rights>Copyright © 2021 the American College of Foot and Ankle Surgeons. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c356t-e7f6b42e7feaf4f4519b7a9bcb560856d3068bbc1f88d3a2e9e9165b9705a5f53</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c356t-e7f6b42e7feaf4f4519b7a9bcb560856d3068bbc1f88d3a2e9e9165b9705a5f53</cites><orcidid>0000-0002-4076-8036 ; 0000-0002-5101-1207</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1067251621004592$$EHTML$$P50$$Gelsevier$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,3537,27901,27902,65306</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34953668$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Gill, Ankurpreet Singh</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gorski, Matthew</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Strage, Katya Eve</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Dunn, Jason Tyler</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Jerabek, Morgan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hoffman, Kristine Marie</creatorcontrib><title>Oral Versus Intravenous Antibiotics for Residual Osteomyelitis After Amputation in the Diabetic Foot</title><title>The Journal of foot and ankle surgery</title><addtitle>J Foot Ankle Surg</addtitle><description>The standard management for residual osteomyelitis following amputation in a diabetic foot infection includes a prolonged course of intravenous antibiotic agents. The purpose of this analysis was to investigate whether oral antibiotic therapy led to treatment failure more than intravenous antibiotic therapy for this indication. The primary endpoint was treatment failure within one year of the initial amputation, defined by re-operation for residual osteomyelitic infection or a remaining nonhealing wound at the surgical site. All patients received at least 4 weeks of antibiotics and were chosen for oral or intravenous route of administration by infectious disease specialists. Characteristics including age, sex, hemoglobin A1c, BMI, tobacco use, PVD, homelessness and IDSA classification were also assessed for influence on antibiotic success and failure. Of the 65 patients meeting inclusion criteria, treatment failure occurred in 32 and treatment success occurred in 33. Of the treatment failures, 17 (53%) were in the intravenous group, and 15 (47%) were in the oral group. The differences between the modalities of antibiotic administration and their failure rates were not found to be statistically significant (p = .28 (proportional difference: -14%, 95% confidence interval [CI]:−36% to 10%)).</description><subject>antibiotic failure</subject><subject>diabetic foot infection</subject><subject>infectious disease</subject><subject>osteomyelitis</subject><subject>positive margins</subject><issn>1067-2516</issn><issn>1542-2224</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2022</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNp9kEtLxDAUhYMovv-AC8nSTWuSNmkLbgbfIAyIug1JeoMZ2mZMUsF_b4ZRl67uWXznwP0QOqOkpIRXl6tyZVUsGWG0pLQkROygQ8prVjDG6t2ciWgKxqk4QEcxrghhrGv5Pjqo6o5XQrSHqF8GNeA3CHGO-HFKQX3C5HNeTMlp55MzEVsf8DNE18-ZXcYEfvyCwSWXMZsg4MW4npNKzk_YTTi9A75xSkMu4zvv0wnas2qIcPpzj9Hr3e3L9UPxtLx_vF48FabiIhXQWKFrlg8oW9ua0043qtNGc0FaLvqKiFZrQ23b9pVi0EFHBdddQ7jillfH6GK7uw7-Y4aY5OiigWFQE-SfJBO0bngW1GSUbVETfIwBrFwHN6rwJSmRG7tyJTd25caupFRmu7l0_rM_6xH6v8qvzgxcbQHIX346CDIaB5OB3gUwSfbe_bf_DaX7jLE</recordid><startdate>20220701</startdate><enddate>20220701</enddate><creator>Gill, Ankurpreet Singh</creator><creator>Gorski, Matthew</creator><creator>Strage, Katya Eve</creator><creator>Dunn, Jason Tyler</creator><creator>Jerabek, Morgan</creator><creator>Hoffman, Kristine Marie</creator><general>Elsevier Inc</general><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4076-8036</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5101-1207</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20220701</creationdate><title>Oral Versus Intravenous Antibiotics for Residual Osteomyelitis After Amputation in the Diabetic Foot</title><author>Gill, Ankurpreet Singh ; Gorski, Matthew ; Strage, Katya Eve ; Dunn, Jason Tyler ; Jerabek, Morgan ; Hoffman, Kristine Marie</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c356t-e7f6b42e7feaf4f4519b7a9bcb560856d3068bbc1f88d3a2e9e9165b9705a5f53</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2022</creationdate><topic>antibiotic failure</topic><topic>diabetic foot infection</topic><topic>infectious disease</topic><topic>osteomyelitis</topic><topic>positive margins</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Gill, Ankurpreet Singh</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gorski, Matthew</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Strage, Katya Eve</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Dunn, Jason Tyler</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Jerabek, Morgan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hoffman, Kristine Marie</creatorcontrib><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>The Journal of foot and ankle surgery</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Gill, Ankurpreet Singh</au><au>Gorski, Matthew</au><au>Strage, Katya Eve</au><au>Dunn, Jason Tyler</au><au>Jerabek, Morgan</au><au>Hoffman, Kristine Marie</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Oral Versus Intravenous Antibiotics for Residual Osteomyelitis After Amputation in the Diabetic Foot</atitle><jtitle>The Journal of foot and ankle surgery</jtitle><addtitle>J Foot Ankle Surg</addtitle><date>2022-07-01</date><risdate>2022</risdate><volume>61</volume><issue>4</issue><spage>735</spage><epage>738</epage><pages>735-738</pages><issn>1067-2516</issn><eissn>1542-2224</eissn><abstract>The standard management for residual osteomyelitis following amputation in a diabetic foot infection includes a prolonged course of intravenous antibiotic agents. The purpose of this analysis was to investigate whether oral antibiotic therapy led to treatment failure more than intravenous antibiotic therapy for this indication. The primary endpoint was treatment failure within one year of the initial amputation, defined by re-operation for residual osteomyelitic infection or a remaining nonhealing wound at the surgical site. All patients received at least 4 weeks of antibiotics and were chosen for oral or intravenous route of administration by infectious disease specialists. Characteristics including age, sex, hemoglobin A1c, BMI, tobacco use, PVD, homelessness and IDSA classification were also assessed for influence on antibiotic success and failure. Of the 65 patients meeting inclusion criteria, treatment failure occurred in 32 and treatment success occurred in 33. Of the treatment failures, 17 (53%) were in the intravenous group, and 15 (47%) were in the oral group. The differences between the modalities of antibiotic administration and their failure rates were not found to be statistically significant (p = .28 (proportional difference: -14%, 95% confidence interval [CI]:−36% to 10%)).</abstract><cop>United States</cop><pub>Elsevier Inc</pub><pmid>34953668</pmid><doi>10.1053/j.jfas.2021.11.006</doi><tpages>4</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4076-8036</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5101-1207</orcidid></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 1067-2516 |
ispartof | The Journal of foot and ankle surgery, 2022-07, Vol.61 (4), p.735-738 |
issn | 1067-2516 1542-2224 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2614755427 |
source | Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals |
subjects | antibiotic failure diabetic foot infection infectious disease osteomyelitis positive margins |
title | Oral Versus Intravenous Antibiotics for Residual Osteomyelitis After Amputation in the Diabetic Foot |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-11T09%3A23%3A40IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Oral%20Versus%20Intravenous%20Antibiotics%20for%20Residual%20Osteomyelitis%20After%20Amputation%20in%20the%20Diabetic%20Foot&rft.jtitle=The%20Journal%20of%20foot%20and%20ankle%20surgery&rft.au=Gill,%20Ankurpreet%20Singh&rft.date=2022-07-01&rft.volume=61&rft.issue=4&rft.spage=735&rft.epage=738&rft.pages=735-738&rft.issn=1067-2516&rft.eissn=1542-2224&rft_id=info:doi/10.1053/j.jfas.2021.11.006&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2614755427%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2614755427&rft_id=info:pmid/34953668&rft_els_id=S1067251621004592&rfr_iscdi=true |