Evaluating the effects of social interaction on the results of preference assessments for leisure items

A variable that may influence the outcomes of stimulus preference assessments (SPAs) is whether social interaction is provided during the stimulus access period. In Experiment 1, we compared the outcomes of a Solitary paired stimulus preference assessment (PSPA) (toys only), Social PSPA (toys plus s...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Journal of applied behavior analysis 2022-03, Vol.55 (2), p.430-450
Hauptverfasser: Kanaman, Nicole A., Hubbs, Amber L., Dozier, Claudia L., Jones, Brooke A., Foley, Elizabeth, Brandt, Julie Ackerlund
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 450
container_issue 2
container_start_page 430
container_title Journal of applied behavior analysis
container_volume 55
creator Kanaman, Nicole A.
Hubbs, Amber L.
Dozier, Claudia L.
Jones, Brooke A.
Foley, Elizabeth
Brandt, Julie Ackerlund
description A variable that may influence the outcomes of stimulus preference assessments (SPAs) is whether social interaction is provided during the stimulus access period. In Experiment 1, we compared the outcomes of a Solitary paired stimulus preference assessment (PSPA) (toys only), Social PSPA (toys plus social interaction), and Combined PSPA (toys alone and toys plus social interaction) to determine whether the addition of social interaction influenced preference for toys in preschool children. In Experiment 2, we conducted a concurrent‐operant reinforcer assessment to compare the reinforcing efficacy of stimuli with and without social interaction. Experiment 1 showed preference for toys was stable across assessments (Solitary and Social PSPAs) and most participants preferred toys plus social interaction when compared in a single assessment (Combined PSPA). Experiment 2 showed that results of the Combined PSPA in Experiment 1 predicted the outcome of most participants' reinforcer assessments.
doi_str_mv 10.1002/jaba.897
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2614753784</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2644259202</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3497-5b03acfc332da08897cb7f844433f8ce7f9580d59bd675b391b1b94fd1ba8fb3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp1kE1LJDEQhoMo66gL_gIJeNlLa9JJJunjOIxfDHjx3iTpimboj9lU94r_fjOM7oIgFNShHh7eegk55-yKM1Zeb6yzV6bSB2TGK2EKoZk4JLN84oUxSh2TE8QNY7xkc_WDHAtZKSOVnpGX1R_bTnaM_QsdX4FCCOBHpEOgOPhoWxr7EZL1Yxx6mmcHJcCp3UPbBAES9B6oRQTEDvp8CUOiLUScEtA4Qodn5CjYFuHnxz4lz7er5-V9sX66e1gu1oXPmXShHBPWBy9E2Vhm8kve6WCklEIE40GHHJw1qnLNXCsnKu64q2RouLMmOHFKfu212zT8ngDHuovooW1tD8OEdTnnUiuhjczo5Rd0M0ypz-EyJWWpqpKV_4U-DYj52XqbYmfTe81Zveu-3nVf56AZvfgQTq6D5h_4WXYGij3wFlt4_1ZUPy5uFjvhX1cKjsg</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2644259202</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Evaluating the effects of social interaction on the results of preference assessments for leisure items</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Wiley Online Library Journals Frontfile Complete</source><source>Sociological Abstracts</source><source>PubMed Central</source><creator>Kanaman, Nicole A. ; Hubbs, Amber L. ; Dozier, Claudia L. ; Jones, Brooke A. ; Foley, Elizabeth ; Brandt, Julie Ackerlund</creator><creatorcontrib>Kanaman, Nicole A. ; Hubbs, Amber L. ; Dozier, Claudia L. ; Jones, Brooke A. ; Foley, Elizabeth ; Brandt, Julie Ackerlund</creatorcontrib><description>A variable that may influence the outcomes of stimulus preference assessments (SPAs) is whether social interaction is provided during the stimulus access period. In Experiment 1, we compared the outcomes of a Solitary paired stimulus preference assessment (PSPA) (toys only), Social PSPA (toys plus social interaction), and Combined PSPA (toys alone and toys plus social interaction) to determine whether the addition of social interaction influenced preference for toys in preschool children. In Experiment 2, we conducted a concurrent‐operant reinforcer assessment to compare the reinforcing efficacy of stimuli with and without social interaction. Experiment 1 showed preference for toys was stable across assessments (Solitary and Social PSPAs) and most participants preferred toys plus social interaction when compared in a single assessment (Combined PSPA). Experiment 2 showed that results of the Combined PSPA in Experiment 1 predicted the outcome of most participants' reinforcer assessments.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0021-8855</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1938-3703</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1002/jaba.897</identifier><identifier>PMID: 34958457</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Hoboken, USA: Wiley Subscription Services, Inc</publisher><subject>Behavior Therapy - methods ; Child, Preschool ; Choice Behavior ; Evaluation ; Experiments ; Humans ; Leisure ; Leisure Activities ; paired‐stimulus preference assessment ; Preferences ; Preschool children ; Reinforcement, Psychology ; reinforcer assessment ; Social Interaction ; stimulus preference assessment</subject><ispartof>Journal of applied behavior analysis, 2022-03, Vol.55 (2), p.430-450</ispartof><rights>2021 Society for the Experimental Analysis of Behavior</rights><rights>2021 Society for the Experimental Analysis of Behavior.</rights><rights>2022 Society for the Experimental Analysis of Behavior</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3497-5b03acfc332da08897cb7f844433f8ce7f9580d59bd675b391b1b94fd1ba8fb3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3497-5b03acfc332da08897cb7f844433f8ce7f9580d59bd675b391b1b94fd1ba8fb3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1002%2Fjaba.897$$EPDF$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1002%2Fjaba.897$$EHTML$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,777,781,1412,27905,27906,33755,45555,45556</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34958457$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Kanaman, Nicole A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hubbs, Amber L.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Dozier, Claudia L.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Jones, Brooke A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Foley, Elizabeth</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Brandt, Julie Ackerlund</creatorcontrib><title>Evaluating the effects of social interaction on the results of preference assessments for leisure items</title><title>Journal of applied behavior analysis</title><addtitle>J Appl Behav Anal</addtitle><description>A variable that may influence the outcomes of stimulus preference assessments (SPAs) is whether social interaction is provided during the stimulus access period. In Experiment 1, we compared the outcomes of a Solitary paired stimulus preference assessment (PSPA) (toys only), Social PSPA (toys plus social interaction), and Combined PSPA (toys alone and toys plus social interaction) to determine whether the addition of social interaction influenced preference for toys in preschool children. In Experiment 2, we conducted a concurrent‐operant reinforcer assessment to compare the reinforcing efficacy of stimuli with and without social interaction. Experiment 1 showed preference for toys was stable across assessments (Solitary and Social PSPAs) and most participants preferred toys plus social interaction when compared in a single assessment (Combined PSPA). Experiment 2 showed that results of the Combined PSPA in Experiment 1 predicted the outcome of most participants' reinforcer assessments.</description><subject>Behavior Therapy - methods</subject><subject>Child, Preschool</subject><subject>Choice Behavior</subject><subject>Evaluation</subject><subject>Experiments</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Leisure</subject><subject>Leisure Activities</subject><subject>paired‐stimulus preference assessment</subject><subject>Preferences</subject><subject>Preschool children</subject><subject>Reinforcement, Psychology</subject><subject>reinforcer assessment</subject><subject>Social Interaction</subject><subject>stimulus preference assessment</subject><issn>0021-8855</issn><issn>1938-3703</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2022</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><sourceid>BHHNA</sourceid><recordid>eNp1kE1LJDEQhoMo66gL_gIJeNlLa9JJJunjOIxfDHjx3iTpimboj9lU94r_fjOM7oIgFNShHh7eegk55-yKM1Zeb6yzV6bSB2TGK2EKoZk4JLN84oUxSh2TE8QNY7xkc_WDHAtZKSOVnpGX1R_bTnaM_QsdX4FCCOBHpEOgOPhoWxr7EZL1Yxx6mmcHJcCp3UPbBAES9B6oRQTEDvp8CUOiLUScEtA4Qodn5CjYFuHnxz4lz7er5-V9sX66e1gu1oXPmXShHBPWBy9E2Vhm8kve6WCklEIE40GHHJw1qnLNXCsnKu64q2RouLMmOHFKfu212zT8ngDHuovooW1tD8OEdTnnUiuhjczo5Rd0M0ypz-EyJWWpqpKV_4U-DYj52XqbYmfTe81Zveu-3nVf56AZvfgQTq6D5h_4WXYGij3wFlt4_1ZUPy5uFjvhX1cKjsg</recordid><startdate>20220301</startdate><enddate>20220301</enddate><creator>Kanaman, Nicole A.</creator><creator>Hubbs, Amber L.</creator><creator>Dozier, Claudia L.</creator><creator>Jones, Brooke A.</creator><creator>Foley, Elizabeth</creator><creator>Brandt, Julie Ackerlund</creator><general>Wiley Subscription Services, Inc</general><general>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7U4</scope><scope>BHHNA</scope><scope>DWI</scope><scope>K7.</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>NAPCQ</scope><scope>WZK</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20220301</creationdate><title>Evaluating the effects of social interaction on the results of preference assessments for leisure items</title><author>Kanaman, Nicole A. ; Hubbs, Amber L. ; Dozier, Claudia L. ; Jones, Brooke A. ; Foley, Elizabeth ; Brandt, Julie Ackerlund</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c3497-5b03acfc332da08897cb7f844433f8ce7f9580d59bd675b391b1b94fd1ba8fb3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2022</creationdate><topic>Behavior Therapy - methods</topic><topic>Child, Preschool</topic><topic>Choice Behavior</topic><topic>Evaluation</topic><topic>Experiments</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Leisure</topic><topic>Leisure Activities</topic><topic>paired‐stimulus preference assessment</topic><topic>Preferences</topic><topic>Preschool children</topic><topic>Reinforcement, Psychology</topic><topic>reinforcer assessment</topic><topic>Social Interaction</topic><topic>stimulus preference assessment</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Kanaman, Nicole A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hubbs, Amber L.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Dozier, Claudia L.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Jones, Brooke A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Foley, Elizabeth</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Brandt, Julie Ackerlund</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Sociological Abstracts (pre-2017)</collection><collection>Sociological Abstracts</collection><collection>Sociological Abstracts</collection><collection>ProQuest Criminal Justice (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Health &amp; Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Nursing &amp; Allied Health Premium</collection><collection>Sociological Abstracts (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Journal of applied behavior analysis</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Kanaman, Nicole A.</au><au>Hubbs, Amber L.</au><au>Dozier, Claudia L.</au><au>Jones, Brooke A.</au><au>Foley, Elizabeth</au><au>Brandt, Julie Ackerlund</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Evaluating the effects of social interaction on the results of preference assessments for leisure items</atitle><jtitle>Journal of applied behavior analysis</jtitle><addtitle>J Appl Behav Anal</addtitle><date>2022-03-01</date><risdate>2022</risdate><volume>55</volume><issue>2</issue><spage>430</spage><epage>450</epage><pages>430-450</pages><issn>0021-8855</issn><eissn>1938-3703</eissn><abstract>A variable that may influence the outcomes of stimulus preference assessments (SPAs) is whether social interaction is provided during the stimulus access period. In Experiment 1, we compared the outcomes of a Solitary paired stimulus preference assessment (PSPA) (toys only), Social PSPA (toys plus social interaction), and Combined PSPA (toys alone and toys plus social interaction) to determine whether the addition of social interaction influenced preference for toys in preschool children. In Experiment 2, we conducted a concurrent‐operant reinforcer assessment to compare the reinforcing efficacy of stimuli with and without social interaction. Experiment 1 showed preference for toys was stable across assessments (Solitary and Social PSPAs) and most participants preferred toys plus social interaction when compared in a single assessment (Combined PSPA). Experiment 2 showed that results of the Combined PSPA in Experiment 1 predicted the outcome of most participants' reinforcer assessments.</abstract><cop>Hoboken, USA</cop><pub>Wiley Subscription Services, Inc</pub><pmid>34958457</pmid><doi>10.1002/jaba.897</doi><tpages>21</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0021-8855
ispartof Journal of applied behavior analysis, 2022-03, Vol.55 (2), p.430-450
issn 0021-8855
1938-3703
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2614753784
source MEDLINE; Wiley Online Library Journals Frontfile Complete; Sociological Abstracts; PubMed Central
subjects Behavior Therapy - methods
Child, Preschool
Choice Behavior
Evaluation
Experiments
Humans
Leisure
Leisure Activities
paired‐stimulus preference assessment
Preferences
Preschool children
Reinforcement, Psychology
reinforcer assessment
Social Interaction
stimulus preference assessment
title Evaluating the effects of social interaction on the results of preference assessments for leisure items
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-17T12%3A53%3A35IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Evaluating%20the%20effects%20of%20social%20interaction%20on%20the%20results%20of%20preference%20assessments%20for%20leisure%20items&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20applied%20behavior%20analysis&rft.au=Kanaman,%20Nicole%20A.&rft.date=2022-03-01&rft.volume=55&rft.issue=2&rft.spage=430&rft.epage=450&rft.pages=430-450&rft.issn=0021-8855&rft.eissn=1938-3703&rft_id=info:doi/10.1002/jaba.897&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2644259202%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2644259202&rft_id=info:pmid/34958457&rfr_iscdi=true