Medicolegal cases against obstetricians

Medicolegal cases against obstetricians

To the Editor: We read the article on a retrospective, observational study of medicolegal cases against obstetricians and gynaecologists in South Africa (SA)’s private sector[1] with interest. On the surface, there is some good news for obstetrics. Contrary to expectations and international experien...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:South African medical journal 2021-11, Vol.111 (11), p.1034-1034
Hauptverfasser: Pistorius, L R, Bhorat, I, Snyman, L
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Autopsy
Forensic Medicine
Humans
Physicians
South Africa
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 1034
container_issue 11
container_start_page 1034
container_title South African medical journal
container_volume 111
creator Pistorius, L R
Bhorat, I
Snyman, L
description To the Editor: We read the article on a retrospective, observational study of medicolegal cases against obstetricians and gynaecologists in South Africa (SA)’s private sector[1] with interest. On the surface, there is some good news for obstetrics. Contrary to expectations and international experience, the article suggests that medicolegal notifications for gynaecological mishaps are now (at least financially) a greater concern than obstetric claims.
doi_str_mv 10.7196/SAMJ.2021.v111i11.16070
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>gale_proqu</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2614226548</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><galeid>A681771474</galeid><sabinet_id>https://hdl.handle.net/10520/ejc-m_samj_v111_i11_a1034</sabinet_id><sourcerecordid>A681771474</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c424t-7da968f7dbd57a921e84ca169117863c594d6911ec54dd405cabcb5aefebc5e33</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNptkU1v1DAQhi0EotvCX4CVkIDLBo_jj-S4qqBQteIAnK2JPWm8yscSeyvx73G6C6IS8sGy_byeGT2MvQZeGKj1h2_b2-tCcAHFPQAEgAI0N_wJWwluqo2CUj1lKy6U3tTKyDN2HuOO57Oq9XN2Vspa1kKXK_bulnxwU0932K8dRoprvMMwxrSempgozcEFHOML9qzFPtLL037Bfnz6-P3y8-bm69WXy-3Nxkkh08Z4rHXVGt94ZbAWQJV0CLoGMJUunaqlXw7klPRecuWwcY1Caqlxisrygr0__rufp58HiskOITrqexxpOkQrNEghtJJVRt8c0dw62TC2U5rRLbjd6gqMAWlkpor_UHl5GvLgI7Uh3z8KvP0n0BH2qYtTf0hhGuNj0BxBN08xztTa_RwGnH9Z4HaxZBdLdrFkT5bsg6WcfHUa8tAM5P_m_mjJwPURiNiEkZKNSJm1XUr7aDvf2w5Hn9tb3oArwS3tnB0yN-weitmlGgIvZfkb8KmmHA</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2614226548</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Medicolegal cases against obstetricians</title><source>Sabinet Open Access Journals</source><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Open Access: African Journals Online</source><source>DOAJ (Directory of Open Access Journals)</source><source>Alma/SFX Local Collection</source><source>EZB Electronic Journals Library</source><creator>Pistorius, L R ; Bhorat, I ; Snyman, L</creator><creatorcontrib>Pistorius, L R ; Bhorat, I ; Snyman, L</creatorcontrib><description>To the Editor: We read the article on a retrospective, observational study of medicolegal cases against obstetricians and gynaecologists in South Africa (SA)’s private sector[1] with interest. On the surface, there is some good news for obstetrics. Contrary to expectations and international experience, the article suggests that medicolegal notifications for gynaecological mishaps are now (at least financially) a greater concern than obstetric claims.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0256-9574</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 2078-5135</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.7196/SAMJ.2021.v111i11.16070</identifier><identifier>PMID: 34949263</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>South Africa: Health and Medical Publishing Group (HMPG)</publisher><subject>Autopsy ; Forensic Medicine ; Humans ; Physicians ; South Africa</subject><ispartof>South African medical journal, 2021-11, Vol.111 (11), p.1034-1034</ispartof><rights>COPYRIGHT 2021 Health &amp; Medical Publishing Group</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,860,27901,27902,39219</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34949263$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Pistorius, L R</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bhorat, I</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Snyman, L</creatorcontrib><title>Medicolegal cases against obstetricians</title><title>South African medical journal</title><addtitle>S Afr Med J</addtitle><description>To the Editor: We read the article on a retrospective, observational study of medicolegal cases against obstetricians and gynaecologists in South Africa (SA)’s private sector[1] with interest. On the surface, there is some good news for obstetrics. Contrary to expectations and international experience, the article suggests that medicolegal notifications for gynaecological mishaps are now (at least financially) a greater concern than obstetric claims.</description><subject>Autopsy</subject><subject>Forensic Medicine</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Physicians</subject><subject>South Africa</subject><issn>0256-9574</issn><issn>2078-5135</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2021</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>JRA</sourceid><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNptkU1v1DAQhi0EotvCX4CVkIDLBo_jj-S4qqBQteIAnK2JPWm8yscSeyvx73G6C6IS8sGy_byeGT2MvQZeGKj1h2_b2-tCcAHFPQAEgAI0N_wJWwluqo2CUj1lKy6U3tTKyDN2HuOO57Oq9XN2Vspa1kKXK_bulnxwU0932K8dRoprvMMwxrSempgozcEFHOML9qzFPtLL037Bfnz6-P3y8-bm69WXy-3Nxkkh08Z4rHXVGt94ZbAWQJV0CLoGMJUunaqlXw7klPRecuWwcY1Caqlxisrygr0__rufp58HiskOITrqexxpOkQrNEghtJJVRt8c0dw62TC2U5rRLbjd6gqMAWlkpor_UHl5GvLgI7Uh3z8KvP0n0BH2qYtTf0hhGuNj0BxBN08xztTa_RwGnH9Z4HaxZBdLdrFkT5bsg6WcfHUa8tAM5P_m_mjJwPURiNiEkZKNSJm1XUr7aDvf2w5Hn9tb3oArwS3tnB0yN-weitmlGgIvZfkb8KmmHA</recordid><startdate>20211101</startdate><enddate>20211101</enddate><creator>Pistorius, L R</creator><creator>Bhorat, I</creator><creator>Snyman, L</creator><general>Health and Medical Publishing Group (HMPG)</general><general>Health &amp; Medical Publishing Group</general><scope>AEIZH</scope><scope>JRA</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20211101</creationdate><title>Medicolegal cases against obstetricians</title><author>Pistorius, L R ; Bhorat, I ; Snyman, L</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c424t-7da968f7dbd57a921e84ca169117863c594d6911ec54dd405cabcb5aefebc5e33</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2021</creationdate><topic>Autopsy</topic><topic>Forensic Medicine</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Physicians</topic><topic>South Africa</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Pistorius, L R</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bhorat, I</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Snyman, L</creatorcontrib><collection>Sabinet:Open Access</collection><collection>Sabinet Open Access Journals</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>South African medical journal</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Pistorius, L R</au><au>Bhorat, I</au><au>Snyman, L</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Medicolegal cases against obstetricians</atitle><jtitle>South African medical journal</jtitle><addtitle>S Afr Med J</addtitle><date>2021-11-01</date><risdate>2021</risdate><volume>111</volume><issue>11</issue><spage>1034</spage><epage>1034</epage><pages>1034-1034</pages><issn>0256-9574</issn><eissn>2078-5135</eissn><abstract>To the Editor: We read the article on a retrospective, observational study of medicolegal cases against obstetricians and gynaecologists in South Africa (SA)’s private sector[1] with interest. On the surface, there is some good news for obstetrics. Contrary to expectations and international experience, the article suggests that medicolegal notifications for gynaecological mishaps are now (at least financially) a greater concern than obstetric claims.</abstract><cop>South Africa</cop><pub>Health and Medical Publishing Group (HMPG)</pub><pmid>34949263</pmid><doi>10.7196/SAMJ.2021.v111i11.16070</doi><tpages>1</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0256-9574
ispartof South African medical journal, 2021-11, Vol.111 (11), p.1034-1034
issn 0256-9574
2078-5135
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2614226548
source Sabinet Open Access Journals; MEDLINE; Open Access: African Journals Online; DOAJ (Directory of Open Access Journals); Alma/SFX Local Collection; EZB Electronic Journals Library
subjects Autopsy
Forensic Medicine
Humans
Physicians
South Africa
title Medicolegal cases against obstetricians
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-01T12%3A39%3A20IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-gale_proqu&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Medicolegal%20cases%20against%20obstetricians&rft.jtitle=South%20African%20medical%20journal&rft.au=Pistorius,%20L%20R&rft.date=2021-11-01&rft.volume=111&rft.issue=11&rft.spage=1034&rft.epage=1034&rft.pages=1034-1034&rft.issn=0256-9574&rft.eissn=2078-5135&rft_id=info:doi/10.7196/SAMJ.2021.v111i11.16070&rft_dat=%3Cgale_proqu%3EA681771474%3C/gale_proqu%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2614226548&rft_id=info:pmid/34949263&rft_galeid=A681771474&rft_sabinet_id=https://hdl.handle.net/10520/ejc-m_samj_v111_i11_a1034&rfr_iscdi=true