Use of Three-Dimensional Imaging to Assess the Effectiveness of Volume as a Critical Variable in Breast Implant Selection

In breast augmentation, breast base diameter has been recognized as an important variable in implant selection. However, breast implant volume also has a tremendous impact on the final result. Previous methods of preoperative volume determination have been limited to external devices in a bra. Compu...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Plastic and reconstructive surgery (1963) 2022-01, Vol.149 (1), p.70-79
Hauptverfasser: Hammond, Dennis C., Kim, Kuylhee, Bageris, Matthew H., Chaudhry, Arif
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 79
container_issue 1
container_start_page 70
container_title Plastic and reconstructive surgery (1963)
container_volume 149
creator Hammond, Dennis C.
Kim, Kuylhee
Bageris, Matthew H.
Chaudhry, Arif
description In breast augmentation, breast base diameter has been recognized as an important variable in implant selection. However, breast implant volume also has a tremendous impact on the final result. Previous methods of preoperative volume determination have been limited to external devices in a bra. Computer-based three-dimensional simulation technology now allows the physician to effectively communicate with the patient preoperatively regarding volume. A cohort of 40 consecutive patients underwent routine breast augmentation with either anatomically shaped or round implants. Five methods of preoperative volume determination including the Crisalix three-dimensional computer imaging system (Crisalix Virtual Aesthetics, Lausanne, Switzerland), along with an associated virtual reality tool, were used to assess the preoperative desires of the patients. A postoperative questionnaire was used to assess patient satisfaction with each volume determination method. Of the 40 patients, 100 percent were satisfied with their result; however, given the opportunity, 12 percent would have chosen a larger implant. The virtual reality tool and external sizers were shown to be the most effective in choosing an implant. The virtual reality tool was judged to be very helpful (62 percent), very accurate (78 percent), and important (88 percent) in helping patients choose their desired implant size. Prioritizing volume as an implant selection variable in breast augmentation results in a very high rate of patient satisfaction. Therapeutic, IV.
doi_str_mv 10.1097/PRS.0000000000008682
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2613295436</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2613295436</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3521-986358d6d9cb48a59c8a53f2e22e4b390c9dce13b0c61e02b05aa44201787e9c3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNpdkNtuFDEMhiNERbeFN0Aol9xMyXknl2UppVKlInq4HWWynm4gM1niDFXfniwtLcJSbCXy_9n5CXnL2RFndvnh67fLI_ZPtKYVL8iCa2EbJZR4SRaMSdFwpsU-OUD8zhhfSqNfkX2prDSGqQW5v0agaaBXmwzQfAojTBjS5CI9G91tmG5pSfQYERBp2QA9GQbwJfyCafdShTcpziNQh9TRVQ4l-Kq9cTm4PgINE_2YwWGpuG10U6GXEHeANL0me4OLCG8e6yG5_nxytfrSnF-cnq2OzxsvteCNbY3U7dqsre9V67T1NclBgBCgemmZt2sPXPbMGw5M9Ew7p5Sof22XYL08JO8fuNucfs6ApRsDeoh1G0gzdsJwKaxW0tRW9dDqc0LMMHTbHEaX7zvOup3pXTW9-9_0Knv3OGHuR1g_if66_My9S7FAxh9xvoPcbcDFsvnDM1qqRjBR1663ph7O5W-huIwv</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2613295436</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Use of Three-Dimensional Imaging to Assess the Effectiveness of Volume as a Critical Variable in Breast Implant Selection</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Journals@Ovid Complete</source><creator>Hammond, Dennis C. ; Kim, Kuylhee ; Bageris, Matthew H. ; Chaudhry, Arif</creator><creatorcontrib>Hammond, Dennis C. ; Kim, Kuylhee ; Bageris, Matthew H. ; Chaudhry, Arif</creatorcontrib><description>In breast augmentation, breast base diameter has been recognized as an important variable in implant selection. However, breast implant volume also has a tremendous impact on the final result. Previous methods of preoperative volume determination have been limited to external devices in a bra. Computer-based three-dimensional simulation technology now allows the physician to effectively communicate with the patient preoperatively regarding volume. A cohort of 40 consecutive patients underwent routine breast augmentation with either anatomically shaped or round implants. Five methods of preoperative volume determination including the Crisalix three-dimensional computer imaging system (Crisalix Virtual Aesthetics, Lausanne, Switzerland), along with an associated virtual reality tool, were used to assess the preoperative desires of the patients. A postoperative questionnaire was used to assess patient satisfaction with each volume determination method. Of the 40 patients, 100 percent were satisfied with their result; however, given the opportunity, 12 percent would have chosen a larger implant. The virtual reality tool and external sizers were shown to be the most effective in choosing an implant. The virtual reality tool was judged to be very helpful (62 percent), very accurate (78 percent), and important (88 percent) in helping patients choose their desired implant size. Prioritizing volume as an implant selection variable in breast augmentation results in a very high rate of patient satisfaction. Therapeutic, IV.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0032-1052</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1529-4242</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1097/PRS.0000000000008682</identifier><identifier>PMID: 34936604</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>United States: Lippincott Williams &amp; Wilkins</publisher><subject>Adult ; Breast Implantation - methods ; Breast Implants ; Female ; Humans ; Imaging, Three-Dimensional - methods ; Middle Aged ; Patient Satisfaction ; Prosthesis Design</subject><ispartof>Plastic and reconstructive surgery (1963), 2022-01, Vol.149 (1), p.70-79</ispartof><rights>Lippincott Williams &amp; Wilkins</rights><rights>Copyright © 2021 by the American Society of Plastic Surgeons.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3521-986358d6d9cb48a59c8a53f2e22e4b390c9dce13b0c61e02b05aa44201787e9c3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3521-986358d6d9cb48a59c8a53f2e22e4b390c9dce13b0c61e02b05aa44201787e9c3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27924,27925</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34936604$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Hammond, Dennis C.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kim, Kuylhee</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bageris, Matthew H.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Chaudhry, Arif</creatorcontrib><title>Use of Three-Dimensional Imaging to Assess the Effectiveness of Volume as a Critical Variable in Breast Implant Selection</title><title>Plastic and reconstructive surgery (1963)</title><addtitle>Plast Reconstr Surg</addtitle><description>In breast augmentation, breast base diameter has been recognized as an important variable in implant selection. However, breast implant volume also has a tremendous impact on the final result. Previous methods of preoperative volume determination have been limited to external devices in a bra. Computer-based three-dimensional simulation technology now allows the physician to effectively communicate with the patient preoperatively regarding volume. A cohort of 40 consecutive patients underwent routine breast augmentation with either anatomically shaped or round implants. Five methods of preoperative volume determination including the Crisalix three-dimensional computer imaging system (Crisalix Virtual Aesthetics, Lausanne, Switzerland), along with an associated virtual reality tool, were used to assess the preoperative desires of the patients. A postoperative questionnaire was used to assess patient satisfaction with each volume determination method. Of the 40 patients, 100 percent were satisfied with their result; however, given the opportunity, 12 percent would have chosen a larger implant. The virtual reality tool and external sizers were shown to be the most effective in choosing an implant. The virtual reality tool was judged to be very helpful (62 percent), very accurate (78 percent), and important (88 percent) in helping patients choose their desired implant size. Prioritizing volume as an implant selection variable in breast augmentation results in a very high rate of patient satisfaction. Therapeutic, IV.</description><subject>Adult</subject><subject>Breast Implantation - methods</subject><subject>Breast Implants</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Imaging, Three-Dimensional - methods</subject><subject>Middle Aged</subject><subject>Patient Satisfaction</subject><subject>Prosthesis Design</subject><issn>0032-1052</issn><issn>1529-4242</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2022</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNpdkNtuFDEMhiNERbeFN0Aol9xMyXknl2UppVKlInq4HWWynm4gM1niDFXfniwtLcJSbCXy_9n5CXnL2RFndvnh67fLI_ZPtKYVL8iCa2EbJZR4SRaMSdFwpsU-OUD8zhhfSqNfkX2prDSGqQW5v0agaaBXmwzQfAojTBjS5CI9G91tmG5pSfQYERBp2QA9GQbwJfyCafdShTcpziNQh9TRVQ4l-Kq9cTm4PgINE_2YwWGpuG10U6GXEHeANL0me4OLCG8e6yG5_nxytfrSnF-cnq2OzxsvteCNbY3U7dqsre9V67T1NclBgBCgemmZt2sPXPbMGw5M9Ew7p5Sof22XYL08JO8fuNucfs6ApRsDeoh1G0gzdsJwKaxW0tRW9dDqc0LMMHTbHEaX7zvOup3pXTW9-9_0Knv3OGHuR1g_if66_My9S7FAxh9xvoPcbcDFsvnDM1qqRjBR1663ph7O5W-huIwv</recordid><startdate>20220101</startdate><enddate>20220101</enddate><creator>Hammond, Dennis C.</creator><creator>Kim, Kuylhee</creator><creator>Bageris, Matthew H.</creator><creator>Chaudhry, Arif</creator><general>Lippincott Williams &amp; Wilkins</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20220101</creationdate><title>Use of Three-Dimensional Imaging to Assess the Effectiveness of Volume as a Critical Variable in Breast Implant Selection</title><author>Hammond, Dennis C. ; Kim, Kuylhee ; Bageris, Matthew H. ; Chaudhry, Arif</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c3521-986358d6d9cb48a59c8a53f2e22e4b390c9dce13b0c61e02b05aa44201787e9c3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2022</creationdate><topic>Adult</topic><topic>Breast Implantation - methods</topic><topic>Breast Implants</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Imaging, Three-Dimensional - methods</topic><topic>Middle Aged</topic><topic>Patient Satisfaction</topic><topic>Prosthesis Design</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Hammond, Dennis C.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kim, Kuylhee</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bageris, Matthew H.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Chaudhry, Arif</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Plastic and reconstructive surgery (1963)</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Hammond, Dennis C.</au><au>Kim, Kuylhee</au><au>Bageris, Matthew H.</au><au>Chaudhry, Arif</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Use of Three-Dimensional Imaging to Assess the Effectiveness of Volume as a Critical Variable in Breast Implant Selection</atitle><jtitle>Plastic and reconstructive surgery (1963)</jtitle><addtitle>Plast Reconstr Surg</addtitle><date>2022-01-01</date><risdate>2022</risdate><volume>149</volume><issue>1</issue><spage>70</spage><epage>79</epage><pages>70-79</pages><issn>0032-1052</issn><eissn>1529-4242</eissn><abstract>In breast augmentation, breast base diameter has been recognized as an important variable in implant selection. However, breast implant volume also has a tremendous impact on the final result. Previous methods of preoperative volume determination have been limited to external devices in a bra. Computer-based three-dimensional simulation technology now allows the physician to effectively communicate with the patient preoperatively regarding volume. A cohort of 40 consecutive patients underwent routine breast augmentation with either anatomically shaped or round implants. Five methods of preoperative volume determination including the Crisalix three-dimensional computer imaging system (Crisalix Virtual Aesthetics, Lausanne, Switzerland), along with an associated virtual reality tool, were used to assess the preoperative desires of the patients. A postoperative questionnaire was used to assess patient satisfaction with each volume determination method. Of the 40 patients, 100 percent were satisfied with their result; however, given the opportunity, 12 percent would have chosen a larger implant. The virtual reality tool and external sizers were shown to be the most effective in choosing an implant. The virtual reality tool was judged to be very helpful (62 percent), very accurate (78 percent), and important (88 percent) in helping patients choose their desired implant size. Prioritizing volume as an implant selection variable in breast augmentation results in a very high rate of patient satisfaction. Therapeutic, IV.</abstract><cop>United States</cop><pub>Lippincott Williams &amp; Wilkins</pub><pmid>34936604</pmid><doi>10.1097/PRS.0000000000008682</doi><tpages>10</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0032-1052
ispartof Plastic and reconstructive surgery (1963), 2022-01, Vol.149 (1), p.70-79
issn 0032-1052
1529-4242
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2613295436
source MEDLINE; Journals@Ovid Complete
subjects Adult
Breast Implantation - methods
Breast Implants
Female
Humans
Imaging, Three-Dimensional - methods
Middle Aged
Patient Satisfaction
Prosthesis Design
title Use of Three-Dimensional Imaging to Assess the Effectiveness of Volume as a Critical Variable in Breast Implant Selection
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-24T04%3A00%3A12IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Use%20of%20Three-Dimensional%20Imaging%20to%20Assess%20the%20Effectiveness%20of%20Volume%20as%20a%20Critical%20Variable%20in%20Breast%20Implant%20Selection&rft.jtitle=Plastic%20and%20reconstructive%20surgery%20(1963)&rft.au=Hammond,%20Dennis%20C.&rft.date=2022-01-01&rft.volume=149&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=70&rft.epage=79&rft.pages=70-79&rft.issn=0032-1052&rft.eissn=1529-4242&rft_id=info:doi/10.1097/PRS.0000000000008682&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2613295436%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2613295436&rft_id=info:pmid/34936604&rfr_iscdi=true