Analysis of Operating Room Efficiency During Robot-Assisted Urologic Surgeries Utilizing Fixed (Nonprocedural) Operative Times

To analyze operating room (OR) efficiency by evaluating fixed OR times for three common urologic robot-assisted procedures. Over a 24-month period, we prospectively collected intraoperative data for 635 consecutive robot-assisted surgeries. Fixed (nonprocedural) OR times were evaluated for robot-ass...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Journal of endourology 2022-05, Vol.36 (5), p.654-660
Hauptverfasser: Geldmaker, Laura E, Hasse, Christopher H, Baird, Bryce A, Haehn, Daniela A, Anyane-Yeboah, Abena N, Wieczorek, Mikolaj A, Ball, Colleen T, Dora, Chandler D, Lyon, Timothy D, Thiel, David D
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 660
container_issue 5
container_start_page 654
container_title Journal of endourology
container_volume 36
creator Geldmaker, Laura E
Hasse, Christopher H
Baird, Bryce A
Haehn, Daniela A
Anyane-Yeboah, Abena N
Wieczorek, Mikolaj A
Ball, Colleen T
Dora, Chandler D
Lyon, Timothy D
Thiel, David D
description To analyze operating room (OR) efficiency by evaluating fixed OR times for three common urologic robot-assisted procedures. Over a 24-month period, we prospectively collected intraoperative data for 635 consecutive robot-assisted surgeries. Fixed (nonprocedural) OR times were evaluated for robot-assisted partial nephrectomy (RAPN) (  = 146), robot-assisted radical cystectomy (RARC) (  = 77), and robot-assisted radical prostatectomy (RARP) (  = 412). Fixed OR times were defined as nonprocedural time in the OR, including in-room time to anesthesia release time (IRAT), anesthesia release to cut time (ARCT), in-room time to cut time (IRCT; IRAT+ARCT), and close time to wheels out time (CTWO). The effects of operation time of day and the number of anesthesia personnel (AP) present in procedure on fixed OR times were also analyzed. Fixed OR times occupied 15.1% (IQR: 12.9%-17.1%) (RARC), 26.6% (22.9%-30.8%) (RAPN), and 20.1% (17.4%-23.1%) (RARP) of total OR time. Time of day did not have a negative effect on fixed OR times for robotic urologic surgeries. Median AP count was highest for RARC (median: 3 and range: 1-7). We did not find any association between AP count and fixed OR times for any of the procedures (  ≥ 0.19). Fixed OR times made up a significant percentage of total OR time for robot-assisted procedures and should be incorporated into OR efficiency analyses. The number of AP per case and time of day of procedure did not negatively impact fixed OR times in urologic robotic surgeries.
doi_str_mv 10.1089/end.2021.0673
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2613290866</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2613290866</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c223t-78c406690da5d52aad313c72b099c30d56bcb1f26fdcc765c75cb2e07cc9c0a63</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNo9kMFP2zAUh61pCDrguOvkYzmkPNuNXR8raNkkBBJQiVvkPDuVpyTu7GRaOfC3k6h0pyf93qffe_oI-c5gxmChr11rZxw4m4FU4guZsDxXmQZ4_Uomw55nSmk4I99S-g3AhGTilJyJuRZqzhYT8r5sTb1PPtFQ0cedi6bz7ZY-hdDQVVV59K7FPb3t4yEuQ5ct08B3ztJNDHXYeqTPfdy66F2im87X_m1k1_7fgEwfQruLAZ3to6mvjif-OvriG5cuyEll6uQuP-c52axXLzc_s_vHu183y_sMORddphY4Byk1WJPbnBtjBROoeAlaowCbyxJLVnFZWUQlc1Q5ltyBQtQIRopzMj30Dr_86V3qisYndHVtWhf6VPDBC9ewkCOaHVCMIaXoqmIXfWPivmBQjMqLQXkxKi9G5QP_47O6Lxtn_9NHx-ID-wR-6w</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2613290866</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Analysis of Operating Room Efficiency During Robot-Assisted Urologic Surgeries Utilizing Fixed (Nonprocedural) Operative Times</title><source>Alma/SFX Local Collection</source><creator>Geldmaker, Laura E ; Hasse, Christopher H ; Baird, Bryce A ; Haehn, Daniela A ; Anyane-Yeboah, Abena N ; Wieczorek, Mikolaj A ; Ball, Colleen T ; Dora, Chandler D ; Lyon, Timothy D ; Thiel, David D</creator><creatorcontrib>Geldmaker, Laura E ; Hasse, Christopher H ; Baird, Bryce A ; Haehn, Daniela A ; Anyane-Yeboah, Abena N ; Wieczorek, Mikolaj A ; Ball, Colleen T ; Dora, Chandler D ; Lyon, Timothy D ; Thiel, David D</creatorcontrib><description>To analyze operating room (OR) efficiency by evaluating fixed OR times for three common urologic robot-assisted procedures. Over a 24-month period, we prospectively collected intraoperative data for 635 consecutive robot-assisted surgeries. Fixed (nonprocedural) OR times were evaluated for robot-assisted partial nephrectomy (RAPN) (  = 146), robot-assisted radical cystectomy (RARC) (  = 77), and robot-assisted radical prostatectomy (RARP) (  = 412). Fixed OR times were defined as nonprocedural time in the OR, including in-room time to anesthesia release time (IRAT), anesthesia release to cut time (ARCT), in-room time to cut time (IRCT; IRAT+ARCT), and close time to wheels out time (CTWO). The effects of operation time of day and the number of anesthesia personnel (AP) present in procedure on fixed OR times were also analyzed. Fixed OR times occupied 15.1% (IQR: 12.9%-17.1%) (RARC), 26.6% (22.9%-30.8%) (RAPN), and 20.1% (17.4%-23.1%) (RARP) of total OR time. Time of day did not have a negative effect on fixed OR times for robotic urologic surgeries. Median AP count was highest for RARC (median: 3 and range: 1-7). We did not find any association between AP count and fixed OR times for any of the procedures (  ≥ 0.19). Fixed OR times made up a significant percentage of total OR time for robot-assisted procedures and should be incorporated into OR efficiency analyses. The number of AP per case and time of day of procedure did not negatively impact fixed OR times in urologic robotic surgeries.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0892-7790</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1557-900X</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1089/end.2021.0673</identifier><identifier>PMID: 34937418</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>United States</publisher><ispartof>Journal of endourology, 2022-05, Vol.36 (5), p.654-660</ispartof><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c223t-78c406690da5d52aad313c72b099c30d56bcb1f26fdcc765c75cb2e07cc9c0a63</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c223t-78c406690da5d52aad313c72b099c30d56bcb1f26fdcc765c75cb2e07cc9c0a63</cites><orcidid>0000-0002-9248-1328</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,27901,27902</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34937418$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Geldmaker, Laura E</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hasse, Christopher H</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Baird, Bryce A</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Haehn, Daniela A</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Anyane-Yeboah, Abena N</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wieczorek, Mikolaj A</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ball, Colleen T</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Dora, Chandler D</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lyon, Timothy D</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Thiel, David D</creatorcontrib><title>Analysis of Operating Room Efficiency During Robot-Assisted Urologic Surgeries Utilizing Fixed (Nonprocedural) Operative Times</title><title>Journal of endourology</title><addtitle>J Endourol</addtitle><description>To analyze operating room (OR) efficiency by evaluating fixed OR times for three common urologic robot-assisted procedures. Over a 24-month period, we prospectively collected intraoperative data for 635 consecutive robot-assisted surgeries. Fixed (nonprocedural) OR times were evaluated for robot-assisted partial nephrectomy (RAPN) (  = 146), robot-assisted radical cystectomy (RARC) (  = 77), and robot-assisted radical prostatectomy (RARP) (  = 412). Fixed OR times were defined as nonprocedural time in the OR, including in-room time to anesthesia release time (IRAT), anesthesia release to cut time (ARCT), in-room time to cut time (IRCT; IRAT+ARCT), and close time to wheels out time (CTWO). The effects of operation time of day and the number of anesthesia personnel (AP) present in procedure on fixed OR times were also analyzed. Fixed OR times occupied 15.1% (IQR: 12.9%-17.1%) (RARC), 26.6% (22.9%-30.8%) (RAPN), and 20.1% (17.4%-23.1%) (RARP) of total OR time. Time of day did not have a negative effect on fixed OR times for robotic urologic surgeries. Median AP count was highest for RARC (median: 3 and range: 1-7). We did not find any association between AP count and fixed OR times for any of the procedures (  ≥ 0.19). Fixed OR times made up a significant percentage of total OR time for robot-assisted procedures and should be incorporated into OR efficiency analyses. The number of AP per case and time of day of procedure did not negatively impact fixed OR times in urologic robotic surgeries.</description><issn>0892-7790</issn><issn>1557-900X</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2022</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNo9kMFP2zAUh61pCDrguOvkYzmkPNuNXR8raNkkBBJQiVvkPDuVpyTu7GRaOfC3k6h0pyf93qffe_oI-c5gxmChr11rZxw4m4FU4guZsDxXmQZ4_Uomw55nSmk4I99S-g3AhGTilJyJuRZqzhYT8r5sTb1PPtFQ0cedi6bz7ZY-hdDQVVV59K7FPb3t4yEuQ5ct08B3ztJNDHXYeqTPfdy66F2im87X_m1k1_7fgEwfQruLAZ3to6mvjif-OvriG5cuyEll6uQuP-c52axXLzc_s_vHu183y_sMORddphY4Byk1WJPbnBtjBROoeAlaowCbyxJLVnFZWUQlc1Q5ltyBQtQIRopzMj30Dr_86V3qisYndHVtWhf6VPDBC9ewkCOaHVCMIaXoqmIXfWPivmBQjMqLQXkxKi9G5QP_47O6Lxtn_9NHx-ID-wR-6w</recordid><startdate>202205</startdate><enddate>202205</enddate><creator>Geldmaker, Laura E</creator><creator>Hasse, Christopher H</creator><creator>Baird, Bryce A</creator><creator>Haehn, Daniela A</creator><creator>Anyane-Yeboah, Abena N</creator><creator>Wieczorek, Mikolaj A</creator><creator>Ball, Colleen T</creator><creator>Dora, Chandler D</creator><creator>Lyon, Timothy D</creator><creator>Thiel, David D</creator><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9248-1328</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>202205</creationdate><title>Analysis of Operating Room Efficiency During Robot-Assisted Urologic Surgeries Utilizing Fixed (Nonprocedural) Operative Times</title><author>Geldmaker, Laura E ; Hasse, Christopher H ; Baird, Bryce A ; Haehn, Daniela A ; Anyane-Yeboah, Abena N ; Wieczorek, Mikolaj A ; Ball, Colleen T ; Dora, Chandler D ; Lyon, Timothy D ; Thiel, David D</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c223t-78c406690da5d52aad313c72b099c30d56bcb1f26fdcc765c75cb2e07cc9c0a63</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2022</creationdate><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Geldmaker, Laura E</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hasse, Christopher H</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Baird, Bryce A</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Haehn, Daniela A</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Anyane-Yeboah, Abena N</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wieczorek, Mikolaj A</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ball, Colleen T</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Dora, Chandler D</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lyon, Timothy D</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Thiel, David D</creatorcontrib><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Journal of endourology</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Geldmaker, Laura E</au><au>Hasse, Christopher H</au><au>Baird, Bryce A</au><au>Haehn, Daniela A</au><au>Anyane-Yeboah, Abena N</au><au>Wieczorek, Mikolaj A</au><au>Ball, Colleen T</au><au>Dora, Chandler D</au><au>Lyon, Timothy D</au><au>Thiel, David D</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Analysis of Operating Room Efficiency During Robot-Assisted Urologic Surgeries Utilizing Fixed (Nonprocedural) Operative Times</atitle><jtitle>Journal of endourology</jtitle><addtitle>J Endourol</addtitle><date>2022-05</date><risdate>2022</risdate><volume>36</volume><issue>5</issue><spage>654</spage><epage>660</epage><pages>654-660</pages><issn>0892-7790</issn><eissn>1557-900X</eissn><abstract>To analyze operating room (OR) efficiency by evaluating fixed OR times for three common urologic robot-assisted procedures. Over a 24-month period, we prospectively collected intraoperative data for 635 consecutive robot-assisted surgeries. Fixed (nonprocedural) OR times were evaluated for robot-assisted partial nephrectomy (RAPN) (  = 146), robot-assisted radical cystectomy (RARC) (  = 77), and robot-assisted radical prostatectomy (RARP) (  = 412). Fixed OR times were defined as nonprocedural time in the OR, including in-room time to anesthesia release time (IRAT), anesthesia release to cut time (ARCT), in-room time to cut time (IRCT; IRAT+ARCT), and close time to wheels out time (CTWO). The effects of operation time of day and the number of anesthesia personnel (AP) present in procedure on fixed OR times were also analyzed. Fixed OR times occupied 15.1% (IQR: 12.9%-17.1%) (RARC), 26.6% (22.9%-30.8%) (RAPN), and 20.1% (17.4%-23.1%) (RARP) of total OR time. Time of day did not have a negative effect on fixed OR times for robotic urologic surgeries. Median AP count was highest for RARC (median: 3 and range: 1-7). We did not find any association between AP count and fixed OR times for any of the procedures (  ≥ 0.19). Fixed OR times made up a significant percentage of total OR time for robot-assisted procedures and should be incorporated into OR efficiency analyses. The number of AP per case and time of day of procedure did not negatively impact fixed OR times in urologic robotic surgeries.</abstract><cop>United States</cop><pmid>34937418</pmid><doi>10.1089/end.2021.0673</doi><tpages>7</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9248-1328</orcidid></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0892-7790
ispartof Journal of endourology, 2022-05, Vol.36 (5), p.654-660
issn 0892-7790
1557-900X
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2613290866
source Alma/SFX Local Collection
title Analysis of Operating Room Efficiency During Robot-Assisted Urologic Surgeries Utilizing Fixed (Nonprocedural) Operative Times
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-09T02%3A21%3A31IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Analysis%20of%20Operating%20Room%20Efficiency%20During%20Robot-Assisted%20Urologic%20Surgeries%20Utilizing%20Fixed%20(Nonprocedural)%20Operative%20Times&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20endourology&rft.au=Geldmaker,%20Laura%20E&rft.date=2022-05&rft.volume=36&rft.issue=5&rft.spage=654&rft.epage=660&rft.pages=654-660&rft.issn=0892-7790&rft.eissn=1557-900X&rft_id=info:doi/10.1089/end.2021.0673&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2613290866%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2613290866&rft_id=info:pmid/34937418&rfr_iscdi=true