Oxcarbazepine versus Carbamazepine for the Treatment of Post-Stroke Epilepsy: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
To systematically evaluate the medication safety and effectiveness of Oxcarbazepine (OXC) and carbamazepine (CBZ) for the treatment of post-stroke epilepsy (PSE). We searched Medline and other databases to identify the randomized controlled trials (RCTs) that compare the efficacies of OXC and CBZ in...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Turkish neurosurgery 2022-01, Vol.32 (2), p.176-184 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 184 |
---|---|
container_issue | 2 |
container_start_page | 176 |
container_title | Turkish neurosurgery |
container_volume | 32 |
creator | Zhang, Ying-Ju Lu, Xue-Ming Li, Pei-Wu Guo, Chang-An Wan, Dong-Jun |
description | To systematically evaluate the medication safety and effectiveness of Oxcarbazepine (OXC) and carbamazepine (CBZ) for the treatment of post-stroke epilepsy (PSE).
We searched Medline and other databases to identify the randomized controlled trials (RCTs) that compare the efficacies of OXC and CBZ in treating PSE. Two authors extracted and analyzed the data independently with Revman 5.3 software. The Q-test and I2 were used to test the statistical heterogeneity. The fixed or random effect models were selected according to heterogeneity.
Eight RCTs that include 671 patients were involved in this study. The meta-analyses result showed that the overall efficiency of OXC was significantly better than that of CBZ (OR=4.55, 95% confidence interval (CI) (3.04?6.81)), the overall adverse events (OR=0.27, 95% CI (0.18?0.42), and the incidence of vomiting (OR=0.28, 95% CI (0.09?0.85)) of OXC was significantly less than that of CBZ. No significant differences in the incidence of rash (OR=0.45, 95% CI (0.19?1.07)), lethargy (OR=0.49, 95% CI (0.16?1.45)), and dizziness (OR=0.51, 95% CI (0.20?1.35)) were detected between OXC and CBZ.
OXC seems to be superior to CBZ in the treatment of PSE, with higher efficacy, and safety than the latter. However, more research on OXC and CBZ in the treatment of PSE is required in the later stage due to the sample size limitation of our study. |
doi_str_mv | 10.5137/1019-5149.JTN.34664-21.3 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2612734575</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2612734575</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c260t-b926ecf9bbbd0833afbd87c91ce5f04d6550162f3371d157e5468a2c681430a93</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNo9kMlOwzAURb0A0VL4BeQlmwQPsZOwq6oyqVBEy9pynBcRyITtFsrX09CW1ZPuu4N0EMKUhILy-IoSmgaCRmn4sHwKeSRlFDAa8iM0_H8N0Klz74RIySg9QQMepVySWA6Rm38bbTP9A13ZAF6DdSuHJ71UH8Sitdi_AV5a0L6GxuO2wM-t88HC2_YD8LQrK-jc5hqP8WLjPNTalwa_wLqEL6ybHD-C18G40dXGle4MHRe6cnC-vyP0ejNdTu6C2fz2fjKeBYZJ4oMsZRJMkWZZlpOEc11keRKblBoQBYlyKQShkhWcxzSnIgYRyUQzIxMacaJTPkKXu97Otp8rcF7VpTNQVbqBduUUk5TFPBKx2FqTndXY1jkLhepsWWu7UZSoHrPqWaqepdpiVn-YFaOKb6MX-5VVVkP-Hzww5r-Ol3xn</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2612734575</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Oxcarbazepine versus Carbamazepine for the Treatment of Post-Stroke Epilepsy: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals</source><creator>Zhang, Ying-Ju ; Lu, Xue-Ming ; Li, Pei-Wu ; Guo, Chang-An ; Wan, Dong-Jun</creator><creatorcontrib>Zhang, Ying-Ju ; Lu, Xue-Ming ; Li, Pei-Wu ; Guo, Chang-An ; Wan, Dong-Jun</creatorcontrib><description>To systematically evaluate the medication safety and effectiveness of Oxcarbazepine (OXC) and carbamazepine (CBZ) for the treatment of post-stroke epilepsy (PSE).
We searched Medline and other databases to identify the randomized controlled trials (RCTs) that compare the efficacies of OXC and CBZ in treating PSE. Two authors extracted and analyzed the data independently with Revman 5.3 software. The Q-test and I2 were used to test the statistical heterogeneity. The fixed or random effect models were selected according to heterogeneity.
Eight RCTs that include 671 patients were involved in this study. The meta-analyses result showed that the overall efficiency of OXC was significantly better than that of CBZ (OR=4.55, 95% confidence interval (CI) (3.04?6.81)), the overall adverse events (OR=0.27, 95% CI (0.18?0.42), and the incidence of vomiting (OR=0.28, 95% CI (0.09?0.85)) of OXC was significantly less than that of CBZ. No significant differences in the incidence of rash (OR=0.45, 95% CI (0.19?1.07)), lethargy (OR=0.49, 95% CI (0.16?1.45)), and dizziness (OR=0.51, 95% CI (0.20?1.35)) were detected between OXC and CBZ.
OXC seems to be superior to CBZ in the treatment of PSE, with higher efficacy, and safety than the latter. However, more research on OXC and CBZ in the treatment of PSE is required in the later stage due to the sample size limitation of our study.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1019-5149</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.5137/1019-5149.JTN.34664-21.3</identifier><identifier>PMID: 34936076</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Turkey</publisher><subject>Anticonvulsants - therapeutic use ; Carbamazepine - adverse effects ; Epilepsy - chemically induced ; Epilepsy - etiology ; Humans ; Oxcarbazepine - therapeutic use</subject><ispartof>Turkish neurosurgery, 2022-01, Vol.32 (2), p.176-184</ispartof><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27924,27925</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34936076$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Zhang, Ying-Ju</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lu, Xue-Ming</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Li, Pei-Wu</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Guo, Chang-An</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wan, Dong-Jun</creatorcontrib><title>Oxcarbazepine versus Carbamazepine for the Treatment of Post-Stroke Epilepsy: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis</title><title>Turkish neurosurgery</title><addtitle>Turk Neurosurg</addtitle><description>To systematically evaluate the medication safety and effectiveness of Oxcarbazepine (OXC) and carbamazepine (CBZ) for the treatment of post-stroke epilepsy (PSE).
We searched Medline and other databases to identify the randomized controlled trials (RCTs) that compare the efficacies of OXC and CBZ in treating PSE. Two authors extracted and analyzed the data independently with Revman 5.3 software. The Q-test and I2 were used to test the statistical heterogeneity. The fixed or random effect models were selected according to heterogeneity.
Eight RCTs that include 671 patients were involved in this study. The meta-analyses result showed that the overall efficiency of OXC was significantly better than that of CBZ (OR=4.55, 95% confidence interval (CI) (3.04?6.81)), the overall adverse events (OR=0.27, 95% CI (0.18?0.42), and the incidence of vomiting (OR=0.28, 95% CI (0.09?0.85)) of OXC was significantly less than that of CBZ. No significant differences in the incidence of rash (OR=0.45, 95% CI (0.19?1.07)), lethargy (OR=0.49, 95% CI (0.16?1.45)), and dizziness (OR=0.51, 95% CI (0.20?1.35)) were detected between OXC and CBZ.
OXC seems to be superior to CBZ in the treatment of PSE, with higher efficacy, and safety than the latter. However, more research on OXC and CBZ in the treatment of PSE is required in the later stage due to the sample size limitation of our study.</description><subject>Anticonvulsants - therapeutic use</subject><subject>Carbamazepine - adverse effects</subject><subject>Epilepsy - chemically induced</subject><subject>Epilepsy - etiology</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Oxcarbazepine - therapeutic use</subject><issn>1019-5149</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2022</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNo9kMlOwzAURb0A0VL4BeQlmwQPsZOwq6oyqVBEy9pynBcRyITtFsrX09CW1ZPuu4N0EMKUhILy-IoSmgaCRmn4sHwKeSRlFDAa8iM0_H8N0Klz74RIySg9QQMepVySWA6Rm38bbTP9A13ZAF6DdSuHJ71UH8Sitdi_AV5a0L6GxuO2wM-t88HC2_YD8LQrK-jc5hqP8WLjPNTalwa_wLqEL6ybHD-C18G40dXGle4MHRe6cnC-vyP0ejNdTu6C2fz2fjKeBYZJ4oMsZRJMkWZZlpOEc11keRKblBoQBYlyKQShkhWcxzSnIgYRyUQzIxMacaJTPkKXu97Otp8rcF7VpTNQVbqBduUUk5TFPBKx2FqTndXY1jkLhepsWWu7UZSoHrPqWaqepdpiVn-YFaOKb6MX-5VVVkP-Hzww5r-Ol3xn</recordid><startdate>20220101</startdate><enddate>20220101</enddate><creator>Zhang, Ying-Ju</creator><creator>Lu, Xue-Ming</creator><creator>Li, Pei-Wu</creator><creator>Guo, Chang-An</creator><creator>Wan, Dong-Jun</creator><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20220101</creationdate><title>Oxcarbazepine versus Carbamazepine for the Treatment of Post-Stroke Epilepsy: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis</title><author>Zhang, Ying-Ju ; Lu, Xue-Ming ; Li, Pei-Wu ; Guo, Chang-An ; Wan, Dong-Jun</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c260t-b926ecf9bbbd0833afbd87c91ce5f04d6550162f3371d157e5468a2c681430a93</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2022</creationdate><topic>Anticonvulsants - therapeutic use</topic><topic>Carbamazepine - adverse effects</topic><topic>Epilepsy - chemically induced</topic><topic>Epilepsy - etiology</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Oxcarbazepine - therapeutic use</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Zhang, Ying-Ju</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lu, Xue-Ming</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Li, Pei-Wu</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Guo, Chang-An</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wan, Dong-Jun</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Turkish neurosurgery</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Zhang, Ying-Ju</au><au>Lu, Xue-Ming</au><au>Li, Pei-Wu</au><au>Guo, Chang-An</au><au>Wan, Dong-Jun</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Oxcarbazepine versus Carbamazepine for the Treatment of Post-Stroke Epilepsy: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis</atitle><jtitle>Turkish neurosurgery</jtitle><addtitle>Turk Neurosurg</addtitle><date>2022-01-01</date><risdate>2022</risdate><volume>32</volume><issue>2</issue><spage>176</spage><epage>184</epage><pages>176-184</pages><issn>1019-5149</issn><abstract>To systematically evaluate the medication safety and effectiveness of Oxcarbazepine (OXC) and carbamazepine (CBZ) for the treatment of post-stroke epilepsy (PSE).
We searched Medline and other databases to identify the randomized controlled trials (RCTs) that compare the efficacies of OXC and CBZ in treating PSE. Two authors extracted and analyzed the data independently with Revman 5.3 software. The Q-test and I2 were used to test the statistical heterogeneity. The fixed or random effect models were selected according to heterogeneity.
Eight RCTs that include 671 patients were involved in this study. The meta-analyses result showed that the overall efficiency of OXC was significantly better than that of CBZ (OR=4.55, 95% confidence interval (CI) (3.04?6.81)), the overall adverse events (OR=0.27, 95% CI (0.18?0.42), and the incidence of vomiting (OR=0.28, 95% CI (0.09?0.85)) of OXC was significantly less than that of CBZ. No significant differences in the incidence of rash (OR=0.45, 95% CI (0.19?1.07)), lethargy (OR=0.49, 95% CI (0.16?1.45)), and dizziness (OR=0.51, 95% CI (0.20?1.35)) were detected between OXC and CBZ.
OXC seems to be superior to CBZ in the treatment of PSE, with higher efficacy, and safety than the latter. However, more research on OXC and CBZ in the treatment of PSE is required in the later stage due to the sample size limitation of our study.</abstract><cop>Turkey</cop><pmid>34936076</pmid><doi>10.5137/1019-5149.JTN.34664-21.3</doi><tpages>9</tpages></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 1019-5149 |
ispartof | Turkish neurosurgery, 2022-01, Vol.32 (2), p.176-184 |
issn | 1019-5149 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2612734575 |
source | MEDLINE; EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals |
subjects | Anticonvulsants - therapeutic use Carbamazepine - adverse effects Epilepsy - chemically induced Epilepsy - etiology Humans Oxcarbazepine - therapeutic use |
title | Oxcarbazepine versus Carbamazepine for the Treatment of Post-Stroke Epilepsy: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-07T00%3A41%3A12IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Oxcarbazepine%20versus%20Carbamazepine%20for%20the%20Treatment%20of%20Post-Stroke%20Epilepsy:%20A%20Systematic%20Review%20and%20Meta-Analysis&rft.jtitle=Turkish%20neurosurgery&rft.au=Zhang,%20Ying-Ju&rft.date=2022-01-01&rft.volume=32&rft.issue=2&rft.spage=176&rft.epage=184&rft.pages=176-184&rft.issn=1019-5149&rft_id=info:doi/10.5137/1019-5149.JTN.34664-21.3&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2612734575%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2612734575&rft_id=info:pmid/34936076&rfr_iscdi=true |