Oxcarbazepine versus Carbamazepine for the Treatment of Post-Stroke Epilepsy: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

To systematically evaluate the medication safety and effectiveness of Oxcarbazepine (OXC) and carbamazepine (CBZ) for the treatment of post-stroke epilepsy (PSE). We searched Medline and other databases to identify the randomized controlled trials (RCTs) that compare the efficacies of OXC and CBZ in...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Turkish neurosurgery 2022-01, Vol.32 (2), p.176-184
Hauptverfasser: Zhang, Ying-Ju, Lu, Xue-Ming, Li, Pei-Wu, Guo, Chang-An, Wan, Dong-Jun
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 184
container_issue 2
container_start_page 176
container_title Turkish neurosurgery
container_volume 32
creator Zhang, Ying-Ju
Lu, Xue-Ming
Li, Pei-Wu
Guo, Chang-An
Wan, Dong-Jun
description To systematically evaluate the medication safety and effectiveness of Oxcarbazepine (OXC) and carbamazepine (CBZ) for the treatment of post-stroke epilepsy (PSE). We searched Medline and other databases to identify the randomized controlled trials (RCTs) that compare the efficacies of OXC and CBZ in treating PSE. Two authors extracted and analyzed the data independently with Revman 5.3 software. The Q-test and I2 were used to test the statistical heterogeneity. The fixed or random effect models were selected according to heterogeneity. Eight RCTs that include 671 patients were involved in this study. The meta-analyses result showed that the overall efficiency of OXC was significantly better than that of CBZ (OR=4.55, 95% confidence interval (CI) (3.04?6.81)), the overall adverse events (OR=0.27, 95% CI (0.18?0.42), and the incidence of vomiting (OR=0.28, 95% CI (0.09?0.85)) of OXC was significantly less than that of CBZ. No significant differences in the incidence of rash (OR=0.45, 95% CI (0.19?1.07)), lethargy (OR=0.49, 95% CI (0.16?1.45)), and dizziness (OR=0.51, 95% CI (0.20?1.35)) were detected between OXC and CBZ. OXC seems to be superior to CBZ in the treatment of PSE, with higher efficacy, and safety than the latter. However, more research on OXC and CBZ in the treatment of PSE is required in the later stage due to the sample size limitation of our study.
doi_str_mv 10.5137/1019-5149.JTN.34664-21.3
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2612734575</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2612734575</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c260t-b926ecf9bbbd0833afbd87c91ce5f04d6550162f3371d157e5468a2c681430a93</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNo9kMlOwzAURb0A0VL4BeQlmwQPsZOwq6oyqVBEy9pynBcRyITtFsrX09CW1ZPuu4N0EMKUhILy-IoSmgaCRmn4sHwKeSRlFDAa8iM0_H8N0Klz74RIySg9QQMepVySWA6Rm38bbTP9A13ZAF6DdSuHJ71UH8Sitdi_AV5a0L6GxuO2wM-t88HC2_YD8LQrK-jc5hqP8WLjPNTalwa_wLqEL6ybHD-C18G40dXGle4MHRe6cnC-vyP0ejNdTu6C2fz2fjKeBYZJ4oMsZRJMkWZZlpOEc11keRKblBoQBYlyKQShkhWcxzSnIgYRyUQzIxMacaJTPkKXu97Otp8rcF7VpTNQVbqBduUUk5TFPBKx2FqTndXY1jkLhepsWWu7UZSoHrPqWaqepdpiVn-YFaOKb6MX-5VVVkP-Hzww5r-Ol3xn</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2612734575</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Oxcarbazepine versus Carbamazepine for the Treatment of Post-Stroke Epilepsy: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals</source><creator>Zhang, Ying-Ju ; Lu, Xue-Ming ; Li, Pei-Wu ; Guo, Chang-An ; Wan, Dong-Jun</creator><creatorcontrib>Zhang, Ying-Ju ; Lu, Xue-Ming ; Li, Pei-Wu ; Guo, Chang-An ; Wan, Dong-Jun</creatorcontrib><description>To systematically evaluate the medication safety and effectiveness of Oxcarbazepine (OXC) and carbamazepine (CBZ) for the treatment of post-stroke epilepsy (PSE). We searched Medline and other databases to identify the randomized controlled trials (RCTs) that compare the efficacies of OXC and CBZ in treating PSE. Two authors extracted and analyzed the data independently with Revman 5.3 software. The Q-test and I2 were used to test the statistical heterogeneity. The fixed or random effect models were selected according to heterogeneity. Eight RCTs that include 671 patients were involved in this study. The meta-analyses result showed that the overall efficiency of OXC was significantly better than that of CBZ (OR=4.55, 95% confidence interval (CI) (3.04?6.81)), the overall adverse events (OR=0.27, 95% CI (0.18?0.42), and the incidence of vomiting (OR=0.28, 95% CI (0.09?0.85)) of OXC was significantly less than that of CBZ. No significant differences in the incidence of rash (OR=0.45, 95% CI (0.19?1.07)), lethargy (OR=0.49, 95% CI (0.16?1.45)), and dizziness (OR=0.51, 95% CI (0.20?1.35)) were detected between OXC and CBZ. OXC seems to be superior to CBZ in the treatment of PSE, with higher efficacy, and safety than the latter. However, more research on OXC and CBZ in the treatment of PSE is required in the later stage due to the sample size limitation of our study.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1019-5149</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.5137/1019-5149.JTN.34664-21.3</identifier><identifier>PMID: 34936076</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Turkey</publisher><subject>Anticonvulsants - therapeutic use ; Carbamazepine - adverse effects ; Epilepsy - chemically induced ; Epilepsy - etiology ; Humans ; Oxcarbazepine - therapeutic use</subject><ispartof>Turkish neurosurgery, 2022-01, Vol.32 (2), p.176-184</ispartof><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27924,27925</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34936076$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Zhang, Ying-Ju</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lu, Xue-Ming</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Li, Pei-Wu</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Guo, Chang-An</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wan, Dong-Jun</creatorcontrib><title>Oxcarbazepine versus Carbamazepine for the Treatment of Post-Stroke Epilepsy: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis</title><title>Turkish neurosurgery</title><addtitle>Turk Neurosurg</addtitle><description>To systematically evaluate the medication safety and effectiveness of Oxcarbazepine (OXC) and carbamazepine (CBZ) for the treatment of post-stroke epilepsy (PSE). We searched Medline and other databases to identify the randomized controlled trials (RCTs) that compare the efficacies of OXC and CBZ in treating PSE. Two authors extracted and analyzed the data independently with Revman 5.3 software. The Q-test and I2 were used to test the statistical heterogeneity. The fixed or random effect models were selected according to heterogeneity. Eight RCTs that include 671 patients were involved in this study. The meta-analyses result showed that the overall efficiency of OXC was significantly better than that of CBZ (OR=4.55, 95% confidence interval (CI) (3.04?6.81)), the overall adverse events (OR=0.27, 95% CI (0.18?0.42), and the incidence of vomiting (OR=0.28, 95% CI (0.09?0.85)) of OXC was significantly less than that of CBZ. No significant differences in the incidence of rash (OR=0.45, 95% CI (0.19?1.07)), lethargy (OR=0.49, 95% CI (0.16?1.45)), and dizziness (OR=0.51, 95% CI (0.20?1.35)) were detected between OXC and CBZ. OXC seems to be superior to CBZ in the treatment of PSE, with higher efficacy, and safety than the latter. However, more research on OXC and CBZ in the treatment of PSE is required in the later stage due to the sample size limitation of our study.</description><subject>Anticonvulsants - therapeutic use</subject><subject>Carbamazepine - adverse effects</subject><subject>Epilepsy - chemically induced</subject><subject>Epilepsy - etiology</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Oxcarbazepine - therapeutic use</subject><issn>1019-5149</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2022</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNo9kMlOwzAURb0A0VL4BeQlmwQPsZOwq6oyqVBEy9pynBcRyITtFsrX09CW1ZPuu4N0EMKUhILy-IoSmgaCRmn4sHwKeSRlFDAa8iM0_H8N0Klz74RIySg9QQMepVySWA6Rm38bbTP9A13ZAF6DdSuHJ71UH8Sitdi_AV5a0L6GxuO2wM-t88HC2_YD8LQrK-jc5hqP8WLjPNTalwa_wLqEL6ybHD-C18G40dXGle4MHRe6cnC-vyP0ejNdTu6C2fz2fjKeBYZJ4oMsZRJMkWZZlpOEc11keRKblBoQBYlyKQShkhWcxzSnIgYRyUQzIxMacaJTPkKXu97Otp8rcF7VpTNQVbqBduUUk5TFPBKx2FqTndXY1jkLhepsWWu7UZSoHrPqWaqepdpiVn-YFaOKb6MX-5VVVkP-Hzww5r-Ol3xn</recordid><startdate>20220101</startdate><enddate>20220101</enddate><creator>Zhang, Ying-Ju</creator><creator>Lu, Xue-Ming</creator><creator>Li, Pei-Wu</creator><creator>Guo, Chang-An</creator><creator>Wan, Dong-Jun</creator><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20220101</creationdate><title>Oxcarbazepine versus Carbamazepine for the Treatment of Post-Stroke Epilepsy: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis</title><author>Zhang, Ying-Ju ; Lu, Xue-Ming ; Li, Pei-Wu ; Guo, Chang-An ; Wan, Dong-Jun</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c260t-b926ecf9bbbd0833afbd87c91ce5f04d6550162f3371d157e5468a2c681430a93</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2022</creationdate><topic>Anticonvulsants - therapeutic use</topic><topic>Carbamazepine - adverse effects</topic><topic>Epilepsy - chemically induced</topic><topic>Epilepsy - etiology</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Oxcarbazepine - therapeutic use</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Zhang, Ying-Ju</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lu, Xue-Ming</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Li, Pei-Wu</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Guo, Chang-An</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wan, Dong-Jun</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Turkish neurosurgery</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Zhang, Ying-Ju</au><au>Lu, Xue-Ming</au><au>Li, Pei-Wu</au><au>Guo, Chang-An</au><au>Wan, Dong-Jun</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Oxcarbazepine versus Carbamazepine for the Treatment of Post-Stroke Epilepsy: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis</atitle><jtitle>Turkish neurosurgery</jtitle><addtitle>Turk Neurosurg</addtitle><date>2022-01-01</date><risdate>2022</risdate><volume>32</volume><issue>2</issue><spage>176</spage><epage>184</epage><pages>176-184</pages><issn>1019-5149</issn><abstract>To systematically evaluate the medication safety and effectiveness of Oxcarbazepine (OXC) and carbamazepine (CBZ) for the treatment of post-stroke epilepsy (PSE). We searched Medline and other databases to identify the randomized controlled trials (RCTs) that compare the efficacies of OXC and CBZ in treating PSE. Two authors extracted and analyzed the data independently with Revman 5.3 software. The Q-test and I2 were used to test the statistical heterogeneity. The fixed or random effect models were selected according to heterogeneity. Eight RCTs that include 671 patients were involved in this study. The meta-analyses result showed that the overall efficiency of OXC was significantly better than that of CBZ (OR=4.55, 95% confidence interval (CI) (3.04?6.81)), the overall adverse events (OR=0.27, 95% CI (0.18?0.42), and the incidence of vomiting (OR=0.28, 95% CI (0.09?0.85)) of OXC was significantly less than that of CBZ. No significant differences in the incidence of rash (OR=0.45, 95% CI (0.19?1.07)), lethargy (OR=0.49, 95% CI (0.16?1.45)), and dizziness (OR=0.51, 95% CI (0.20?1.35)) were detected between OXC and CBZ. OXC seems to be superior to CBZ in the treatment of PSE, with higher efficacy, and safety than the latter. However, more research on OXC and CBZ in the treatment of PSE is required in the later stage due to the sample size limitation of our study.</abstract><cop>Turkey</cop><pmid>34936076</pmid><doi>10.5137/1019-5149.JTN.34664-21.3</doi><tpages>9</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 1019-5149
ispartof Turkish neurosurgery, 2022-01, Vol.32 (2), p.176-184
issn 1019-5149
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2612734575
source MEDLINE; EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals
subjects Anticonvulsants - therapeutic use
Carbamazepine - adverse effects
Epilepsy - chemically induced
Epilepsy - etiology
Humans
Oxcarbazepine - therapeutic use
title Oxcarbazepine versus Carbamazepine for the Treatment of Post-Stroke Epilepsy: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-07T00%3A41%3A12IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Oxcarbazepine%20versus%20Carbamazepine%20for%20the%20Treatment%20of%20Post-Stroke%20Epilepsy:%20A%20Systematic%20Review%20and%20Meta-Analysis&rft.jtitle=Turkish%20neurosurgery&rft.au=Zhang,%20Ying-Ju&rft.date=2022-01-01&rft.volume=32&rft.issue=2&rft.spage=176&rft.epage=184&rft.pages=176-184&rft.issn=1019-5149&rft_id=info:doi/10.5137/1019-5149.JTN.34664-21.3&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2612734575%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2612734575&rft_id=info:pmid/34936076&rfr_iscdi=true