Worldwide trends in oral anticoagulant use in patients with atrial fibrillation from 2010 to 2018: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Non-vitamin K antagonist oral anticoagulants (NOACs) are effective and safe alternatives compared with vitamin K antagonists (VKAs) for thromboembolic prevention in atrial fibrillation (AF), while antiplatelets are no longer recommended. However, to which extent NOAC introduction and guideline updat...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Europace (London, England) England), 2022-07, Vol.24 (6), p.887-898
Hauptverfasser: Grymonprez, Maxim, Simoens, Cynthia, Steurbaut, Stephane, De Backer, Tine L, Lahousse, Lies
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 898
container_issue 6
container_start_page 887
container_title Europace (London, England)
container_volume 24
creator Grymonprez, Maxim
Simoens, Cynthia
Steurbaut, Stephane
De Backer, Tine L
Lahousse, Lies
description Non-vitamin K antagonist oral anticoagulants (NOACs) are effective and safe alternatives compared with vitamin K antagonists (VKAs) for thromboembolic prevention in atrial fibrillation (AF), while antiplatelets are no longer recommended. However, to which extent NOAC introduction and guideline updates have increased OAC use in AF, is unclear. Therefore, worldwide trends in real-life prescribing of OACs, NOACs, VKAs, and antiplatelet monotherapy in AF patients were investigated. Using PubMed and Embase, observational nationwide cohort studies on annual prevalent and/or incident OAC use in non-selected AF patients since 2010 were included. A meta-analysis of single proportions was performed. Twenty-one studies were included assessing prevalent and incident use among 9 758 637 and 197 483 OAC-eligible AF patients, respectively. Worldwide prevalence and incidence of OAC users increased from 0.42 [95% confidence interval (CI) 0.22-0.65] and 0.43 (95% CI 0.37-0.49) in 2010 to 0.78 (95% CI 0.77-0.78) and 0.75 (95% CI 0.74-0.76) in 2018, respectively. Prevalent and incident NOAC users increased globally from 0 in 2010 to 0.45 (95% CI 0.45-0.46) and 0.68 (95% CI 0.67-0.69) in 2018, respectively, whereas prevalent and incident VKA use decreased from 0.42 (95% CI 0.22-0.65) and 0.42 (95% CI 0.36-0.49) in 2010 to 0.32 (95% CI 0.32-0.32) and 0.06 (95% CI 0.06-0.07) in 2018, respectively. Prevalent antiplatelet monotherapy use decreased from 0.37 (95% CI 0.32-0.42) in 2010 to 0.09 (95% CI 0.09-0.10) in 2018. The proportion of OAC users worldwide almost doubled following NOAC introduction. As one-quarter of OAC-eligible AF subjects were not anticoagulated and 9% were only treated with antiplatelets in 2018, there is still room for improvement.
doi_str_mv 10.1093/europace/euab303
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2612733582</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2612733582</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c299t-57b4bdfd5643f306c9284bf5eead9470e78581004d99076c731a3dc472fd78873</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNo9kEFrGzEUhEVJqRO395yKjrls8iStrFVuwaRtwJBLSo-LVnrbKuyuXEkb43_Qn10Z2zm9gflmeAwh1wxuGWhxh3MMW2OxCNMJEB_IJZOCVxw0vygatK4k43pBrlJ6BQDFtfxEFqLWQoIQl-TfrxAHt_MOaY44uUT9REM0AzVT9jaY3_NQFJ0THpytyR6nnOjO5z_U5OgL2fsu-mEoVphoH8NIOTCgORxuc08NTfuUcSyApRHfPO5Ku6MjZlOZyQz75NNn8rE3Q8Ivp7skP789vqx_VJvn70_rh01luda5kqqrO9c7uapFL2BlNW_qrpeIxulaAapGNgygdlqDWlklmBHO1or3TjWNEktyc-zdxvB3xpTb0SeL5f0Jw5xavmJcCSEbXlA4ojaGlCL27Tb60cR9y6A97N-e929P-5fI11P73I3o3gPnwcV_6hKFNg</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2612733582</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Worldwide trends in oral anticoagulant use in patients with atrial fibrillation from 2010 to 2018: a systematic review and meta-analysis</title><source>Oxford Journals Open Access Collection</source><source>EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals</source><source>PubMed Central</source><source>Alma/SFX Local Collection</source><creator>Grymonprez, Maxim ; Simoens, Cynthia ; Steurbaut, Stephane ; De Backer, Tine L ; Lahousse, Lies</creator><creatorcontrib>Grymonprez, Maxim ; Simoens, Cynthia ; Steurbaut, Stephane ; De Backer, Tine L ; Lahousse, Lies</creatorcontrib><description>Non-vitamin K antagonist oral anticoagulants (NOACs) are effective and safe alternatives compared with vitamin K antagonists (VKAs) for thromboembolic prevention in atrial fibrillation (AF), while antiplatelets are no longer recommended. However, to which extent NOAC introduction and guideline updates have increased OAC use in AF, is unclear. Therefore, worldwide trends in real-life prescribing of OACs, NOACs, VKAs, and antiplatelet monotherapy in AF patients were investigated. Using PubMed and Embase, observational nationwide cohort studies on annual prevalent and/or incident OAC use in non-selected AF patients since 2010 were included. A meta-analysis of single proportions was performed. Twenty-one studies were included assessing prevalent and incident use among 9 758 637 and 197 483 OAC-eligible AF patients, respectively. Worldwide prevalence and incidence of OAC users increased from 0.42 [95% confidence interval (CI) 0.22-0.65] and 0.43 (95% CI 0.37-0.49) in 2010 to 0.78 (95% CI 0.77-0.78) and 0.75 (95% CI 0.74-0.76) in 2018, respectively. Prevalent and incident NOAC users increased globally from 0 in 2010 to 0.45 (95% CI 0.45-0.46) and 0.68 (95% CI 0.67-0.69) in 2018, respectively, whereas prevalent and incident VKA use decreased from 0.42 (95% CI 0.22-0.65) and 0.42 (95% CI 0.36-0.49) in 2010 to 0.32 (95% CI 0.32-0.32) and 0.06 (95% CI 0.06-0.07) in 2018, respectively. Prevalent antiplatelet monotherapy use decreased from 0.37 (95% CI 0.32-0.42) in 2010 to 0.09 (95% CI 0.09-0.10) in 2018. The proportion of OAC users worldwide almost doubled following NOAC introduction. As one-quarter of OAC-eligible AF subjects were not anticoagulated and 9% were only treated with antiplatelets in 2018, there is still room for improvement.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1099-5129</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1532-2092</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1093/europace/euab303</identifier><identifier>PMID: 34935033</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>England</publisher><ispartof>Europace (London, England), 2022-07, Vol.24 (6), p.887-898</ispartof><rights>Published on behalf of the European Society of Cardiology. All rights reserved. © The Author(s) 2021. For permissions, please email: journals.permissions@oup.com.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c299t-57b4bdfd5643f306c9284bf5eead9470e78581004d99076c731a3dc472fd78873</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c299t-57b4bdfd5643f306c9284bf5eead9470e78581004d99076c731a3dc472fd78873</cites><orcidid>0000-0002-0145-6486</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27923,27924</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34935033$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Grymonprez, Maxim</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Simoens, Cynthia</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Steurbaut, Stephane</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>De Backer, Tine L</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lahousse, Lies</creatorcontrib><title>Worldwide trends in oral anticoagulant use in patients with atrial fibrillation from 2010 to 2018: a systematic review and meta-analysis</title><title>Europace (London, England)</title><addtitle>Europace</addtitle><description>Non-vitamin K antagonist oral anticoagulants (NOACs) are effective and safe alternatives compared with vitamin K antagonists (VKAs) for thromboembolic prevention in atrial fibrillation (AF), while antiplatelets are no longer recommended. However, to which extent NOAC introduction and guideline updates have increased OAC use in AF, is unclear. Therefore, worldwide trends in real-life prescribing of OACs, NOACs, VKAs, and antiplatelet monotherapy in AF patients were investigated. Using PubMed and Embase, observational nationwide cohort studies on annual prevalent and/or incident OAC use in non-selected AF patients since 2010 were included. A meta-analysis of single proportions was performed. Twenty-one studies were included assessing prevalent and incident use among 9 758 637 and 197 483 OAC-eligible AF patients, respectively. Worldwide prevalence and incidence of OAC users increased from 0.42 [95% confidence interval (CI) 0.22-0.65] and 0.43 (95% CI 0.37-0.49) in 2010 to 0.78 (95% CI 0.77-0.78) and 0.75 (95% CI 0.74-0.76) in 2018, respectively. Prevalent and incident NOAC users increased globally from 0 in 2010 to 0.45 (95% CI 0.45-0.46) and 0.68 (95% CI 0.67-0.69) in 2018, respectively, whereas prevalent and incident VKA use decreased from 0.42 (95% CI 0.22-0.65) and 0.42 (95% CI 0.36-0.49) in 2010 to 0.32 (95% CI 0.32-0.32) and 0.06 (95% CI 0.06-0.07) in 2018, respectively. Prevalent antiplatelet monotherapy use decreased from 0.37 (95% CI 0.32-0.42) in 2010 to 0.09 (95% CI 0.09-0.10) in 2018. The proportion of OAC users worldwide almost doubled following NOAC introduction. As one-quarter of OAC-eligible AF subjects were not anticoagulated and 9% were only treated with antiplatelets in 2018, there is still room for improvement.</description><issn>1099-5129</issn><issn>1532-2092</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2022</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNo9kEFrGzEUhEVJqRO395yKjrls8iStrFVuwaRtwJBLSo-LVnrbKuyuXEkb43_Qn10Z2zm9gflmeAwh1wxuGWhxh3MMW2OxCNMJEB_IJZOCVxw0vygatK4k43pBrlJ6BQDFtfxEFqLWQoIQl-TfrxAHt_MOaY44uUT9REM0AzVT9jaY3_NQFJ0THpytyR6nnOjO5z_U5OgL2fsu-mEoVphoH8NIOTCgORxuc08NTfuUcSyApRHfPO5Ku6MjZlOZyQz75NNn8rE3Q8Ivp7skP789vqx_VJvn70_rh01luda5kqqrO9c7uapFL2BlNW_qrpeIxulaAapGNgygdlqDWlklmBHO1or3TjWNEktyc-zdxvB3xpTb0SeL5f0Jw5xavmJcCSEbXlA4ojaGlCL27Tb60cR9y6A97N-e929P-5fI11P73I3o3gPnwcV_6hKFNg</recordid><startdate>20220715</startdate><enddate>20220715</enddate><creator>Grymonprez, Maxim</creator><creator>Simoens, Cynthia</creator><creator>Steurbaut, Stephane</creator><creator>De Backer, Tine L</creator><creator>Lahousse, Lies</creator><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0145-6486</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20220715</creationdate><title>Worldwide trends in oral anticoagulant use in patients with atrial fibrillation from 2010 to 2018: a systematic review and meta-analysis</title><author>Grymonprez, Maxim ; Simoens, Cynthia ; Steurbaut, Stephane ; De Backer, Tine L ; Lahousse, Lies</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c299t-57b4bdfd5643f306c9284bf5eead9470e78581004d99076c731a3dc472fd78873</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2022</creationdate><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Grymonprez, Maxim</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Simoens, Cynthia</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Steurbaut, Stephane</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>De Backer, Tine L</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lahousse, Lies</creatorcontrib><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Europace (London, England)</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Grymonprez, Maxim</au><au>Simoens, Cynthia</au><au>Steurbaut, Stephane</au><au>De Backer, Tine L</au><au>Lahousse, Lies</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Worldwide trends in oral anticoagulant use in patients with atrial fibrillation from 2010 to 2018: a systematic review and meta-analysis</atitle><jtitle>Europace (London, England)</jtitle><addtitle>Europace</addtitle><date>2022-07-15</date><risdate>2022</risdate><volume>24</volume><issue>6</issue><spage>887</spage><epage>898</epage><pages>887-898</pages><issn>1099-5129</issn><eissn>1532-2092</eissn><abstract>Non-vitamin K antagonist oral anticoagulants (NOACs) are effective and safe alternatives compared with vitamin K antagonists (VKAs) for thromboembolic prevention in atrial fibrillation (AF), while antiplatelets are no longer recommended. However, to which extent NOAC introduction and guideline updates have increased OAC use in AF, is unclear. Therefore, worldwide trends in real-life prescribing of OACs, NOACs, VKAs, and antiplatelet monotherapy in AF patients were investigated. Using PubMed and Embase, observational nationwide cohort studies on annual prevalent and/or incident OAC use in non-selected AF patients since 2010 were included. A meta-analysis of single proportions was performed. Twenty-one studies were included assessing prevalent and incident use among 9 758 637 and 197 483 OAC-eligible AF patients, respectively. Worldwide prevalence and incidence of OAC users increased from 0.42 [95% confidence interval (CI) 0.22-0.65] and 0.43 (95% CI 0.37-0.49) in 2010 to 0.78 (95% CI 0.77-0.78) and 0.75 (95% CI 0.74-0.76) in 2018, respectively. Prevalent and incident NOAC users increased globally from 0 in 2010 to 0.45 (95% CI 0.45-0.46) and 0.68 (95% CI 0.67-0.69) in 2018, respectively, whereas prevalent and incident VKA use decreased from 0.42 (95% CI 0.22-0.65) and 0.42 (95% CI 0.36-0.49) in 2010 to 0.32 (95% CI 0.32-0.32) and 0.06 (95% CI 0.06-0.07) in 2018, respectively. Prevalent antiplatelet monotherapy use decreased from 0.37 (95% CI 0.32-0.42) in 2010 to 0.09 (95% CI 0.09-0.10) in 2018. The proportion of OAC users worldwide almost doubled following NOAC introduction. As one-quarter of OAC-eligible AF subjects were not anticoagulated and 9% were only treated with antiplatelets in 2018, there is still room for improvement.</abstract><cop>England</cop><pmid>34935033</pmid><doi>10.1093/europace/euab303</doi><tpages>12</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0145-6486</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 1099-5129
ispartof Europace (London, England), 2022-07, Vol.24 (6), p.887-898
issn 1099-5129
1532-2092
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2612733582
source Oxford Journals Open Access Collection; EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals; PubMed Central; Alma/SFX Local Collection
title Worldwide trends in oral anticoagulant use in patients with atrial fibrillation from 2010 to 2018: a systematic review and meta-analysis
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-10T10%3A21%3A32IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Worldwide%20trends%20in%20oral%20anticoagulant%20use%20in%20patients%20with%20atrial%20fibrillation%20from%202010%20to%202018:%20a%20systematic%20review%20and%20meta-analysis&rft.jtitle=Europace%20(London,%20England)&rft.au=Grymonprez,%20Maxim&rft.date=2022-07-15&rft.volume=24&rft.issue=6&rft.spage=887&rft.epage=898&rft.pages=887-898&rft.issn=1099-5129&rft.eissn=1532-2092&rft_id=info:doi/10.1093/europace/euab303&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2612733582%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2612733582&rft_id=info:pmid/34935033&rfr_iscdi=true