Mind wandering and depression: A status report

•Methodological approaches are very heterogeneous and their interrelation is unclear.•No unambiguous evidence for increased propensity to mind wander in depression.•More experience sampling-based studies with matched healthy controls are needed.•Measures of both mind wandering and rumination should...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Neuroscience and biobehavioral reviews 2022-02, Vol.133, p.104505-104505, Article 104505
Hauptverfasser: Chaieb, Leila, Hoppe, Christian, Fell, Juergen
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 104505
container_issue
container_start_page 104505
container_title Neuroscience and biobehavioral reviews
container_volume 133
creator Chaieb, Leila
Hoppe, Christian
Fell, Juergen
description •Methodological approaches are very heterogeneous and their interrelation is unclear.•No unambiguous evidence for increased propensity to mind wander in depression.•More experience sampling-based studies with matched healthy controls are needed.•Measures of both mind wandering and rumination should be implemented.•Additional data on meta-awareness and intentionality would be informative. While many clinical studies and overviews on the contribution of rumination to depression exist, relatively little information regarding the role of mind wandering (MW) in general is available. Therefore, it remains an open question whether patterns of MW are altered in depression and, if so, how these alterations are related to rumination. Here, we review and discuss studies investigating MW in cohorts, showing either a clinically significant depression or with clinically significant disorders accompanied by depressive symptoms. These studies yield first tentative insights into major issues. However, further investigations are required, specifically studies which: i) compare patients with a primary diagnosis of major depression with healthy and appropriately matched controls, ii) implement measures of both MW and rumination, iii) are based on experience sampling (in combination with other key approaches), iv) compare experience sampling during daily life, resting state and attentional tasks, v) explore possible biases in the assessment of MW, vi) acquire data not only related to the propensity and contents of MW, but also regarding meta-awareness and intentionality.
doi_str_mv 10.1016/j.neubiorev.2021.12.028
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2612392843</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S0149763421005765</els_id><sourcerecordid>2612392843</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c420t-a0a7d1445bc0867790665b81754b1bdbd6d41ef3023e23536976f8ec7c07ea303</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFkMtOwzAQRS0EoqXwC5Alm4TxI3bCrqp4SUVsYG059gS5apNgJ0X8PalaumU1szh3ruYQckMho0Dl3SprcKh8G3CbMWA0oywDVpyQKS0UT1XOilMyBSrKVEkuJuQixhUAMOD5OZlwUbKSsXxKslffuOTbNA6Dbz6TcUkcdgFj9G1zn8yT2Jt-iEnArg39JTmrzTri1WHOyMfjw_viOV2-Pb0s5svUCgZ9asAoR4XIKwuFVKoEKfOqoCoXFa1c5aQTFGsOjCPjOZelknWBVllQaDjwGbnd3-1C-zVg7PXGR4vrtWmwHaJmkjJeskLwEVV71IY2xoC17oLfmPCjKeidLL3SR1l6J0tTpkdZY_L6UDJUG3TH3J-dEZjvARxf3XoMOlqPjUXnA9peu9b_W_ILlOZ9pg</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2612392843</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Mind wandering and depression: A status report</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>ScienceDirect Journals (5 years ago - present)</source><creator>Chaieb, Leila ; Hoppe, Christian ; Fell, Juergen</creator><creatorcontrib>Chaieb, Leila ; Hoppe, Christian ; Fell, Juergen</creatorcontrib><description>•Methodological approaches are very heterogeneous and their interrelation is unclear.•No unambiguous evidence for increased propensity to mind wander in depression.•More experience sampling-based studies with matched healthy controls are needed.•Measures of both mind wandering and rumination should be implemented.•Additional data on meta-awareness and intentionality would be informative. While many clinical studies and overviews on the contribution of rumination to depression exist, relatively little information regarding the role of mind wandering (MW) in general is available. Therefore, it remains an open question whether patterns of MW are altered in depression and, if so, how these alterations are related to rumination. Here, we review and discuss studies investigating MW in cohorts, showing either a clinically significant depression or with clinically significant disorders accompanied by depressive symptoms. These studies yield first tentative insights into major issues. However, further investigations are required, specifically studies which: i) compare patients with a primary diagnosis of major depression with healthy and appropriately matched controls, ii) implement measures of both MW and rumination, iii) are based on experience sampling (in combination with other key approaches), iv) compare experience sampling during daily life, resting state and attentional tasks, v) explore possible biases in the assessment of MW, vi) acquire data not only related to the propensity and contents of MW, but also regarding meta-awareness and intentionality.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0149-7634</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1873-7528</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.neubiorev.2021.12.028</identifier><identifier>PMID: 34929225</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>United States: Elsevier Ltd</publisher><subject>Attention ; Depression ; Depressive Disorder, Major ; Ecological Momentary Assessment ; Experience sampling ; Humans ; Meta-awareness ; Mind wandering ; Rumination ; Self-report scales ; Sustained attention-to-response task (SART)</subject><ispartof>Neuroscience and biobehavioral reviews, 2022-02, Vol.133, p.104505-104505, Article 104505</ispartof><rights>2022 The Authors</rights><rights>Copyright © 2022 The Authors. Published by Elsevier Ltd.. All rights reserved.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c420t-a0a7d1445bc0867790665b81754b1bdbd6d41ef3023e23536976f8ec7c07ea303</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c420t-a0a7d1445bc0867790665b81754b1bdbd6d41ef3023e23536976f8ec7c07ea303</cites><orcidid>0000-0001-7136-6577</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.neubiorev.2021.12.028$$EHTML$$P50$$Gelsevier$$Hfree_for_read</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,3548,27923,27924,45994</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34929225$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Chaieb, Leila</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hoppe, Christian</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Fell, Juergen</creatorcontrib><title>Mind wandering and depression: A status report</title><title>Neuroscience and biobehavioral reviews</title><addtitle>Neurosci Biobehav Rev</addtitle><description>•Methodological approaches are very heterogeneous and their interrelation is unclear.•No unambiguous evidence for increased propensity to mind wander in depression.•More experience sampling-based studies with matched healthy controls are needed.•Measures of both mind wandering and rumination should be implemented.•Additional data on meta-awareness and intentionality would be informative. While many clinical studies and overviews on the contribution of rumination to depression exist, relatively little information regarding the role of mind wandering (MW) in general is available. Therefore, it remains an open question whether patterns of MW are altered in depression and, if so, how these alterations are related to rumination. Here, we review and discuss studies investigating MW in cohorts, showing either a clinically significant depression or with clinically significant disorders accompanied by depressive symptoms. These studies yield first tentative insights into major issues. However, further investigations are required, specifically studies which: i) compare patients with a primary diagnosis of major depression with healthy and appropriately matched controls, ii) implement measures of both MW and rumination, iii) are based on experience sampling (in combination with other key approaches), iv) compare experience sampling during daily life, resting state and attentional tasks, v) explore possible biases in the assessment of MW, vi) acquire data not only related to the propensity and contents of MW, but also regarding meta-awareness and intentionality.</description><subject>Attention</subject><subject>Depression</subject><subject>Depressive Disorder, Major</subject><subject>Ecological Momentary Assessment</subject><subject>Experience sampling</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Meta-awareness</subject><subject>Mind wandering</subject><subject>Rumination</subject><subject>Self-report scales</subject><subject>Sustained attention-to-response task (SART)</subject><issn>0149-7634</issn><issn>1873-7528</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2022</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNqFkMtOwzAQRS0EoqXwC5Alm4TxI3bCrqp4SUVsYG059gS5apNgJ0X8PalaumU1szh3ruYQckMho0Dl3SprcKh8G3CbMWA0oywDVpyQKS0UT1XOilMyBSrKVEkuJuQixhUAMOD5OZlwUbKSsXxKslffuOTbNA6Dbz6TcUkcdgFj9G1zn8yT2Jt-iEnArg39JTmrzTri1WHOyMfjw_viOV2-Pb0s5svUCgZ9asAoR4XIKwuFVKoEKfOqoCoXFa1c5aQTFGsOjCPjOZelknWBVllQaDjwGbnd3-1C-zVg7PXGR4vrtWmwHaJmkjJeskLwEVV71IY2xoC17oLfmPCjKeidLL3SR1l6J0tTpkdZY_L6UDJUG3TH3J-dEZjvARxf3XoMOlqPjUXnA9peu9b_W_ILlOZ9pg</recordid><startdate>202202</startdate><enddate>202202</enddate><creator>Chaieb, Leila</creator><creator>Hoppe, Christian</creator><creator>Fell, Juergen</creator><general>Elsevier Ltd</general><scope>6I.</scope><scope>AAFTH</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7136-6577</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>202202</creationdate><title>Mind wandering and depression: A status report</title><author>Chaieb, Leila ; Hoppe, Christian ; Fell, Juergen</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c420t-a0a7d1445bc0867790665b81754b1bdbd6d41ef3023e23536976f8ec7c07ea303</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2022</creationdate><topic>Attention</topic><topic>Depression</topic><topic>Depressive Disorder, Major</topic><topic>Ecological Momentary Assessment</topic><topic>Experience sampling</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Meta-awareness</topic><topic>Mind wandering</topic><topic>Rumination</topic><topic>Self-report scales</topic><topic>Sustained attention-to-response task (SART)</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Chaieb, Leila</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hoppe, Christian</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Fell, Juergen</creatorcontrib><collection>ScienceDirect Open Access Titles</collection><collection>Elsevier:ScienceDirect:Open Access</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Neuroscience and biobehavioral reviews</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Chaieb, Leila</au><au>Hoppe, Christian</au><au>Fell, Juergen</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Mind wandering and depression: A status report</atitle><jtitle>Neuroscience and biobehavioral reviews</jtitle><addtitle>Neurosci Biobehav Rev</addtitle><date>2022-02</date><risdate>2022</risdate><volume>133</volume><spage>104505</spage><epage>104505</epage><pages>104505-104505</pages><artnum>104505</artnum><issn>0149-7634</issn><eissn>1873-7528</eissn><abstract>•Methodological approaches are very heterogeneous and their interrelation is unclear.•No unambiguous evidence for increased propensity to mind wander in depression.•More experience sampling-based studies with matched healthy controls are needed.•Measures of both mind wandering and rumination should be implemented.•Additional data on meta-awareness and intentionality would be informative. While many clinical studies and overviews on the contribution of rumination to depression exist, relatively little information regarding the role of mind wandering (MW) in general is available. Therefore, it remains an open question whether patterns of MW are altered in depression and, if so, how these alterations are related to rumination. Here, we review and discuss studies investigating MW in cohorts, showing either a clinically significant depression or with clinically significant disorders accompanied by depressive symptoms. These studies yield first tentative insights into major issues. However, further investigations are required, specifically studies which: i) compare patients with a primary diagnosis of major depression with healthy and appropriately matched controls, ii) implement measures of both MW and rumination, iii) are based on experience sampling (in combination with other key approaches), iv) compare experience sampling during daily life, resting state and attentional tasks, v) explore possible biases in the assessment of MW, vi) acquire data not only related to the propensity and contents of MW, but also regarding meta-awareness and intentionality.</abstract><cop>United States</cop><pub>Elsevier Ltd</pub><pmid>34929225</pmid><doi>10.1016/j.neubiorev.2021.12.028</doi><tpages>1</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7136-6577</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0149-7634
ispartof Neuroscience and biobehavioral reviews, 2022-02, Vol.133, p.104505-104505, Article 104505
issn 0149-7634
1873-7528
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2612392843
source MEDLINE; ScienceDirect Journals (5 years ago - present)
subjects Attention
Depression
Depressive Disorder, Major
Ecological Momentary Assessment
Experience sampling
Humans
Meta-awareness
Mind wandering
Rumination
Self-report scales
Sustained attention-to-response task (SART)
title Mind wandering and depression: A status report
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-11T08%3A54%3A56IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Mind%20wandering%20and%20depression:%20A%20status%20report&rft.jtitle=Neuroscience%20and%20biobehavioral%20reviews&rft.au=Chaieb,%20Leila&rft.date=2022-02&rft.volume=133&rft.spage=104505&rft.epage=104505&rft.pages=104505-104505&rft.artnum=104505&rft.issn=0149-7634&rft.eissn=1873-7528&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.neubiorev.2021.12.028&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2612392843%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2612392843&rft_id=info:pmid/34929225&rft_els_id=S0149763421005765&rfr_iscdi=true