comparative study of the inter-relationships between mixograph parameters and bread-making qualities of wheat flours and glutens

The mixing characteristics and bread-making qualities of flours, reconstituted flours and glutens from a diverse range of wheat cultivars obtained from Canada, France and the UK, were investigated. Simple correlations were calculated among Mixograph parameters, loaf volume, Glu-1 quality scores, pro...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Journal of the science of food and agriculture 1996-09, Vol.72 (1), p.71-85
Hauptverfasser: Khatkar, B.S, Bell, A.E, Schofield, J.D
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 85
container_issue 1
container_start_page 71
container_title Journal of the science of food and agriculture
container_volume 72
creator Khatkar, B.S
Bell, A.E
Schofield, J.D
description The mixing characteristics and bread-making qualities of flours, reconstituted flours and glutens from a diverse range of wheat cultivars obtained from Canada, France and the UK, were investigated. Simple correlations were calculated among Mixograph parameters, loaf volume, Glu-1 quality scores, protein content, SDS-sedimentation volume and baking absorption. The results indicate that the mixing properties of flours from cultivars in the medium-strong range are significantly influenced by their protein contents. On the other hand, the mixing properties of 'extra strong' or weak flours are relatively less affected by their protein contents, and it appears that the protein quality primarily controls their behaviour during mixing. Gluten samples, other than weak glutens from cvs Riband and Corin, required a longer time to mix to peak dough resistance (PDR) than their corresponding flour or reconstituted flour samples. However, the differences in mixing time were more pronounced between 'extra strong' glutens and their corresponding flours or reconstituted flours. The Mixograph parameter PDR showed highly significant (P < 0.001) correlations with loaf volume for flour, reconstituted flour and gluten samples. In each case, variation in PDR explained more than 65% of the variation in loaf volume, reaching about 83% for glutens. PDR was also significantly correlated with Glu-1 quality scores. However, the mixing times for flours, reconstituted flours and glutens demonstrated no simple correlations with loaf volume. On the basis of the results, it appears that the 2 g Mixograph PDR value for flour or gluten may be used to assess flour or gluten bread-making quality. It may be used as a viable alternative to the baking test for the evaluation of the baking potential of flour or gluten, as well as an alternative to currently used 'gel protein'-based procedures for differentiating between 'strong' end 'extra strong' wheats.
doi_str_mv 10.1002/(SICI)1097-0010(199609)72:1<71::AID-JSFA625>3.0.CO;2-4
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_pasca</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_26110574</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>1839964456</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-f3855-5628d941ebdf4dafa417f78d50c807bcb70df95b65d176f080f3df18b18cf5333</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNpdkV1v0zAUQCMEEmXwG4gEQttDyvVXnGxoUtWxUTTWhzImeLlyErv1lo8uTuj6xk_HUUsfeLJkn3t05RME5wTGBIB-PF7MprMTAqmMAAgckzSNIT2R9JR8kuT0dDK7iL4uLicxFedsDOPp_IxG_FkwOow8D0ZeRCNBOH0ZvHLuHgC8JR4Ff_KmWqtWdfa3Dl3XF9uwMWG30qGtO91GrS79W1O7lV27MNPdRus6rOxTs2zVehUOs5X2pAtVXYRZq1URVerB1svwsVel7ax2g3Kz0qoLTdn0e3RZ9p2u3evghVGl02_251Fwe_n5-_RLdD2_mk0n15FhiRCRiGlSpJzorDC8UEZxIo1MCgF5AjLLMwmFSUUWi4LI2EAChhWGJBlJciMYY0fBh5133TaPvXYdVtbluixVrZveIY0JASG5B9_9B977nWu_G5KE-V_jXMSeer-nlMtVaVpV59bhurWVarfIKCQ-nsd-7rCNLfX28EwAh7Q4lMUhEw6ZcFcWJUWCkqAPi_uwyBBwOkeK_N-Vd0c7t3Wdfjq4VfuAsWRS4N3NFV6wG_7rB3zDO8-_3fFGNaiWrV_3dkGBMCCCUs5j9hcur7jH</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1839964456</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>comparative study of the inter-relationships between mixograph parameters and bread-making qualities of wheat flours and glutens</title><source>Periodicals Index Online</source><source>Access via Wiley Online Library</source><creator>Khatkar, B.S ; Bell, A.E ; Schofield, J.D</creator><creatorcontrib>Khatkar, B.S ; Bell, A.E ; Schofield, J.D</creatorcontrib><description>The mixing characteristics and bread-making qualities of flours, reconstituted flours and glutens from a diverse range of wheat cultivars obtained from Canada, France and the UK, were investigated. Simple correlations were calculated among Mixograph parameters, loaf volume, Glu-1 quality scores, protein content, SDS-sedimentation volume and baking absorption. The results indicate that the mixing properties of flours from cultivars in the medium-strong range are significantly influenced by their protein contents. On the other hand, the mixing properties of 'extra strong' or weak flours are relatively less affected by their protein contents, and it appears that the protein quality primarily controls their behaviour during mixing. Gluten samples, other than weak glutens from cvs Riband and Corin, required a longer time to mix to peak dough resistance (PDR) than their corresponding flour or reconstituted flour samples. However, the differences in mixing time were more pronounced between 'extra strong' glutens and their corresponding flours or reconstituted flours. The Mixograph parameter PDR showed highly significant (P &lt; 0.001) correlations with loaf volume for flour, reconstituted flour and gluten samples. In each case, variation in PDR explained more than 65% of the variation in loaf volume, reaching about 83% for glutens. PDR was also significantly correlated with Glu-1 quality scores. However, the mixing times for flours, reconstituted flours and glutens demonstrated no simple correlations with loaf volume. On the basis of the results, it appears that the 2 g Mixograph PDR value for flour or gluten may be used to assess flour or gluten bread-making quality. It may be used as a viable alternative to the baking test for the evaluation of the baking potential of flour or gluten, as well as an alternative to currently used 'gel protein'-based procedures for differentiating between 'strong' end 'extra strong' wheats.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0022-5142</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1097-0010</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1002/(SICI)1097-0010(199609)72:1&lt;71::AID-JSFA625&gt;3.0.CO;2-4</identifier><identifier>CODEN: JSFAAE</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>London: John Wiley &amp; Sons, Ltd</publisher><subject>baking quality ; Biological and medical sciences ; bread-making ; breadmaking ; cultivars ; Food industries ; Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology ; gluten ; Milk and cheese industries. Ice creams ; mixing ; Mixograph ; wheat ; wheat cultivar ; wheat flour</subject><ispartof>Journal of the science of food and agriculture, 1996-09, Vol.72 (1), p.71-85</ispartof><rights>Copyright © 1996 SCI</rights><rights>1996 INIST-CNRS</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1002%2F%28SICI%291097-0010%28199609%2972%3A1%3C71%3A%3AAID-JSFA625%3E3.0.CO%3B2-4$$EPDF$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1002%2F%28SICI%291097-0010%28199609%2972%3A1%3C71%3A%3AAID-JSFA625%3E3.0.CO%3B2-4$$EHTML$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>315,781,785,1418,27874,27929,27930,45579,45580</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://pascal-francis.inist.fr/vibad/index.php?action=getRecordDetail&amp;idt=3208100$$DView record in Pascal Francis$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Khatkar, B.S</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bell, A.E</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Schofield, J.D</creatorcontrib><title>comparative study of the inter-relationships between mixograph parameters and bread-making qualities of wheat flours and glutens</title><title>Journal of the science of food and agriculture</title><addtitle>J. Sci. Food Agric</addtitle><description>The mixing characteristics and bread-making qualities of flours, reconstituted flours and glutens from a diverse range of wheat cultivars obtained from Canada, France and the UK, were investigated. Simple correlations were calculated among Mixograph parameters, loaf volume, Glu-1 quality scores, protein content, SDS-sedimentation volume and baking absorption. The results indicate that the mixing properties of flours from cultivars in the medium-strong range are significantly influenced by their protein contents. On the other hand, the mixing properties of 'extra strong' or weak flours are relatively less affected by their protein contents, and it appears that the protein quality primarily controls their behaviour during mixing. Gluten samples, other than weak glutens from cvs Riband and Corin, required a longer time to mix to peak dough resistance (PDR) than their corresponding flour or reconstituted flour samples. However, the differences in mixing time were more pronounced between 'extra strong' glutens and their corresponding flours or reconstituted flours. The Mixograph parameter PDR showed highly significant (P &lt; 0.001) correlations with loaf volume for flour, reconstituted flour and gluten samples. In each case, variation in PDR explained more than 65% of the variation in loaf volume, reaching about 83% for glutens. PDR was also significantly correlated with Glu-1 quality scores. However, the mixing times for flours, reconstituted flours and glutens demonstrated no simple correlations with loaf volume. On the basis of the results, it appears that the 2 g Mixograph PDR value for flour or gluten may be used to assess flour or gluten bread-making quality. It may be used as a viable alternative to the baking test for the evaluation of the baking potential of flour or gluten, as well as an alternative to currently used 'gel protein'-based procedures for differentiating between 'strong' end 'extra strong' wheats.</description><subject>baking quality</subject><subject>Biological and medical sciences</subject><subject>bread-making</subject><subject>breadmaking</subject><subject>cultivars</subject><subject>Food industries</subject><subject>Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology</subject><subject>gluten</subject><subject>Milk and cheese industries. Ice creams</subject><subject>mixing</subject><subject>Mixograph</subject><subject>wheat</subject><subject>wheat cultivar</subject><subject>wheat flour</subject><issn>0022-5142</issn><issn>1097-0010</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>1996</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>K30</sourceid><recordid>eNpdkV1v0zAUQCMEEmXwG4gEQttDyvVXnGxoUtWxUTTWhzImeLlyErv1lo8uTuj6xk_HUUsfeLJkn3t05RME5wTGBIB-PF7MprMTAqmMAAgckzSNIT2R9JR8kuT0dDK7iL4uLicxFedsDOPp_IxG_FkwOow8D0ZeRCNBOH0ZvHLuHgC8JR4Ff_KmWqtWdfa3Dl3XF9uwMWG30qGtO91GrS79W1O7lV27MNPdRus6rOxTs2zVehUOs5X2pAtVXYRZq1URVerB1svwsVel7ax2g3Kz0qoLTdn0e3RZ9p2u3evghVGl02_251Fwe_n5-_RLdD2_mk0n15FhiRCRiGlSpJzorDC8UEZxIo1MCgF5AjLLMwmFSUUWi4LI2EAChhWGJBlJciMYY0fBh5133TaPvXYdVtbluixVrZveIY0JASG5B9_9B977nWu_G5KE-V_jXMSeer-nlMtVaVpV59bhurWVarfIKCQ-nsd-7rCNLfX28EwAh7Q4lMUhEw6ZcFcWJUWCkqAPi_uwyBBwOkeK_N-Vd0c7t3Wdfjq4VfuAsWRS4N3NFV6wG_7rB3zDO8-_3fFGNaiWrV_3dkGBMCCCUs5j9hcur7jH</recordid><startdate>199609</startdate><enddate>199609</enddate><creator>Khatkar, B.S</creator><creator>Bell, A.E</creator><creator>Schofield, J.D</creator><general>John Wiley &amp; Sons, Ltd</general><general>Wiley</general><general>Published for the Society of Chemical Industry by Elsevier Applied Science</general><scope>FBQ</scope><scope>BSCLL</scope><scope>IQODW</scope><scope>HJHVS</scope><scope>IZSXY</scope><scope>K30</scope><scope>PAAUG</scope><scope>PAWHS</scope><scope>PAWZZ</scope><scope>PAXOH</scope><scope>PBHAV</scope><scope>PBQSW</scope><scope>PBYQZ</scope><scope>PCIWU</scope><scope>PCMID</scope><scope>PCZJX</scope><scope>PDGRG</scope><scope>PDWWI</scope><scope>PETMR</scope><scope>PFVGT</scope><scope>PGXDX</scope><scope>PIHIL</scope><scope>PISVA</scope><scope>PJCTQ</scope><scope>PJTMS</scope><scope>PLCHJ</scope><scope>PMHAD</scope><scope>PNQDJ</scope><scope>POUND</scope><scope>PPLAD</scope><scope>PQAPC</scope><scope>PQCAN</scope><scope>PQCMW</scope><scope>PQEME</scope><scope>PQHKH</scope><scope>PQMID</scope><scope>PQNCT</scope><scope>PQNET</scope><scope>PQSCT</scope><scope>PQSET</scope><scope>PSVJG</scope><scope>PVMQY</scope><scope>PZGFC</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>F28</scope><scope>FR3</scope></search><sort><creationdate>199609</creationdate><title>comparative study of the inter-relationships between mixograph parameters and bread-making qualities of wheat flours and glutens</title><author>Khatkar, B.S ; Bell, A.E ; Schofield, J.D</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-f3855-5628d941ebdf4dafa417f78d50c807bcb70df95b65d176f080f3df18b18cf5333</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>1996</creationdate><topic>baking quality</topic><topic>Biological and medical sciences</topic><topic>bread-making</topic><topic>breadmaking</topic><topic>cultivars</topic><topic>Food industries</topic><topic>Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology</topic><topic>gluten</topic><topic>Milk and cheese industries. Ice creams</topic><topic>mixing</topic><topic>Mixograph</topic><topic>wheat</topic><topic>wheat cultivar</topic><topic>wheat flour</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Khatkar, B.S</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bell, A.E</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Schofield, J.D</creatorcontrib><collection>AGRIS</collection><collection>Istex</collection><collection>Pascal-Francis</collection><collection>Periodicals Index Online Segment 19</collection><collection>Periodicals Index Online Segment 30</collection><collection>Periodicals Index Online</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - West</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - International</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access &amp; Build (Plan A) - MEA</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - Midwest</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - Northeast</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - Southeast</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - North Central</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - Southeast</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - South Central</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access &amp; Build (Plan A) - UK / I</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - Canada</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - EMEALA</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - North Central</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - South Central</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access &amp; Build (Plan A) - International</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - International</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - West</collection><collection>Periodicals Index Online Segments 1-50</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - APAC</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - Midwest</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - MEA</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - Canada</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - UK / I</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - EMEALA</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access &amp; Build (Plan A) - APAC</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access &amp; Build (Plan A) - Canada</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access &amp; Build (Plan A) - West</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access &amp; Build (Plan A) - EMEALA</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - Northeast</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access &amp; Build (Plan A) - Midwest</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access &amp; Build (Plan A) - North Central</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access &amp; Build (Plan A) - Northeast</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access &amp; Build (Plan A) - South Central</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access &amp; Build (Plan A) - Southeast</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - UK / I</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - APAC</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - MEA</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>ANTE: Abstracts in New Technology &amp; Engineering</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><jtitle>Journal of the science of food and agriculture</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Khatkar, B.S</au><au>Bell, A.E</au><au>Schofield, J.D</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>comparative study of the inter-relationships between mixograph parameters and bread-making qualities of wheat flours and glutens</atitle><jtitle>Journal of the science of food and agriculture</jtitle><addtitle>J. Sci. Food Agric</addtitle><date>1996-09</date><risdate>1996</risdate><volume>72</volume><issue>1</issue><spage>71</spage><epage>85</epage><pages>71-85</pages><issn>0022-5142</issn><eissn>1097-0010</eissn><coden>JSFAAE</coden><abstract>The mixing characteristics and bread-making qualities of flours, reconstituted flours and glutens from a diverse range of wheat cultivars obtained from Canada, France and the UK, were investigated. Simple correlations were calculated among Mixograph parameters, loaf volume, Glu-1 quality scores, protein content, SDS-sedimentation volume and baking absorption. The results indicate that the mixing properties of flours from cultivars in the medium-strong range are significantly influenced by their protein contents. On the other hand, the mixing properties of 'extra strong' or weak flours are relatively less affected by their protein contents, and it appears that the protein quality primarily controls their behaviour during mixing. Gluten samples, other than weak glutens from cvs Riband and Corin, required a longer time to mix to peak dough resistance (PDR) than their corresponding flour or reconstituted flour samples. However, the differences in mixing time were more pronounced between 'extra strong' glutens and their corresponding flours or reconstituted flours. The Mixograph parameter PDR showed highly significant (P &lt; 0.001) correlations with loaf volume for flour, reconstituted flour and gluten samples. In each case, variation in PDR explained more than 65% of the variation in loaf volume, reaching about 83% for glutens. PDR was also significantly correlated with Glu-1 quality scores. However, the mixing times for flours, reconstituted flours and glutens demonstrated no simple correlations with loaf volume. On the basis of the results, it appears that the 2 g Mixograph PDR value for flour or gluten may be used to assess flour or gluten bread-making quality. It may be used as a viable alternative to the baking test for the evaluation of the baking potential of flour or gluten, as well as an alternative to currently used 'gel protein'-based procedures for differentiating between 'strong' end 'extra strong' wheats.</abstract><cop>London</cop><pub>John Wiley &amp; Sons, Ltd</pub><doi>10.1002/(SICI)1097-0010(199609)72:1&lt;71::AID-JSFA625&gt;3.0.CO;2-4</doi><tpages>15</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0022-5142
ispartof Journal of the science of food and agriculture, 1996-09, Vol.72 (1), p.71-85
issn 0022-5142
1097-0010
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_26110574
source Periodicals Index Online; Access via Wiley Online Library
subjects baking quality
Biological and medical sciences
bread-making
breadmaking
cultivars
Food industries
Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology
gluten
Milk and cheese industries. Ice creams
mixing
Mixograph
wheat
wheat cultivar
wheat flour
title comparative study of the inter-relationships between mixograph parameters and bread-making qualities of wheat flours and glutens
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-11T15%3A44%3A02IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_pasca&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=comparative%20study%20of%20the%20inter-relationships%20between%20mixograph%20parameters%20and%20bread-making%20qualities%20of%20wheat%20flours%20and%20glutens&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20the%20science%20of%20food%20and%20agriculture&rft.au=Khatkar,%20B.S&rft.date=1996-09&rft.volume=72&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=71&rft.epage=85&rft.pages=71-85&rft.issn=0022-5142&rft.eissn=1097-0010&rft.coden=JSFAAE&rft_id=info:doi/10.1002/(SICI)1097-0010(199609)72:1%3C71::AID-JSFA625%3E3.0.CO;2-4&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_pasca%3E1839964456%3C/proquest_pasca%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1839964456&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true