Majority Does Not Rule: The Trouble with Majority-Rule Consensus Trees

The use of majority‐rule consensus trees as a means of resolving ambiguity in phylogenetic analyses is investigated. It is shown to be an inappropriate method for this purpose.

Gespeichert in:

Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:	Cladistics 2001-09, Vol.17 (3), p.282-284
Hauptverfasser:	Sharkey, Michael J., Leathers, Jason W.
Format:	Artikel
Sprache:	eng
Online-Zugang:	Volltext
Tags:	Tag hinzufügen Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!

container_end_page	284
container_issue	3
container_start_page	282
container_title	Cladistics
container_volume	17
creator	Sharkey, Michael J. Leathers, Jason W.
description	The use of majority‐rule consensus trees as a means of resolving ambiguity in phylogenetic analyses is investigated. It is shown to be an inappropriate method for this purpose.
doi_str_mv	10.1111/j.1096-0031.2001.tb00124.x
format	Article
fullrecord	<record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2610905616</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2610905616</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c2862-6138edeaffdcb31fee6657c34d4ce015dc7fddc20fdc4159e809405616ec292a3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqVkE1Pg0AQhjdGE2v1PxBPXsDZXVigB5OG2mrEmpiqxw1dhhSkpbKQtv_eRap35zBzeD-SeQi5puBQM7eFQyEUNgCnDgOgTrM0m7nO_oQM_qRTMgDfDWwO4J-TC60LAGCChQMyfU6Kqs6bgzWpUFvzqrFe2xJH1mKF1qKu2mWJ1i5vVtav0e50K6o2Gje61caEqC_JWZaUGq-Od0jepveL6MGOX2aP0Ti2FQsEswXlAaaYZFmqlpxmiEJ4vuJu6ioE6qXKz9JUMTC6S70QAwhd8AQVqFjIEj4kN33vtq6-WtSNXOdaYVkmG6xaLZkwT_8EjHXUW1VdaV1jJrd1vk7qg6QgO3iykB0h2RGSHTx5hCf3JnzXh3d5iYd_JGUUj1nATIHdF-S6wf1fQVJ_SuFz35Mf85lkfP40mb7H0uXfby2FeQ</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2610905616</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Majority Does Not Rule: The Trouble with Majority-Rule Consensus Trees</title><source>Access via Wiley Online Library</source><source>Alma/SFX Local Collection</source><creator>Sharkey, Michael J. ; Leathers, Jason W.</creator><creatorcontrib>Sharkey, Michael J. ; Leathers, Jason W.</creatorcontrib><description>The use of majority‐rule consensus trees as a means of resolving ambiguity in phylogenetic analyses is investigated. It is shown to be an inappropriate method for this purpose.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0748-3007</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1096-0031</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1111/j.1096-0031.2001.tb00124.x</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Oxford, UK: Blackwell Publishing Ltd</publisher><ispartof>Cladistics, 2001-09, Vol.17 (3), p.282-284</ispartof><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c2862-6138edeaffdcb31fee6657c34d4ce015dc7fddc20fdc4159e809405616ec292a3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c2862-6138edeaffdcb31fee6657c34d4ce015dc7fddc20fdc4159e809405616ec292a3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1111%2Fj.1096-0031.2001.tb00124.x$$EPDF$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1111%2Fj.1096-0031.2001.tb00124.x$$EHTML$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,1417,27924,27925,45574,45575</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Sharkey, Michael J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Leathers, Jason W.</creatorcontrib><title>Majority Does Not Rule: The Trouble with Majority-Rule Consensus Trees</title><title>Cladistics</title><description>The use of majority‐rule consensus trees as a means of resolving ambiguity in phylogenetic analyses is investigated. It is shown to be an inappropriate method for this purpose.</description><issn>0748-3007</issn><issn>1096-0031</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2001</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNqVkE1Pg0AQhjdGE2v1PxBPXsDZXVigB5OG2mrEmpiqxw1dhhSkpbKQtv_eRap35zBzeD-SeQi5puBQM7eFQyEUNgCnDgOgTrM0m7nO_oQM_qRTMgDfDWwO4J-TC60LAGCChQMyfU6Kqs6bgzWpUFvzqrFe2xJH1mKF1qKu2mWJ1i5vVtav0e50K6o2Gje61caEqC_JWZaUGq-Od0jepveL6MGOX2aP0Ti2FQsEswXlAaaYZFmqlpxmiEJ4vuJu6ioE6qXKz9JUMTC6S70QAwhd8AQVqFjIEj4kN33vtq6-WtSNXOdaYVkmG6xaLZkwT_8EjHXUW1VdaV1jJrd1vk7qg6QgO3iykB0h2RGSHTx5hCf3JnzXh3d5iYd_JGUUj1nATIHdF-S6wf1fQVJ_SuFz35Mf85lkfP40mb7H0uXfby2FeQ</recordid><startdate>200109</startdate><enddate>200109</enddate><creator>Sharkey, Michael J.</creator><creator>Leathers, Jason W.</creator><general>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</general><scope>BSCLL</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>200109</creationdate><title>Majority Does Not Rule: The Trouble with Majority-Rule Consensus Trees</title><author>Sharkey, Michael J. ; Leathers, Jason W.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c2862-6138edeaffdcb31fee6657c34d4ce015dc7fddc20fdc4159e809405616ec292a3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2001</creationdate><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Sharkey, Michael J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Leathers, Jason W.</creatorcontrib><collection>Istex</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Cladistics</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Sharkey, Michael J.</au><au>Leathers, Jason W.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Majority Does Not Rule: The Trouble with Majority-Rule Consensus Trees</atitle><jtitle>Cladistics</jtitle><date>2001-09</date><risdate>2001</risdate><volume>17</volume><issue>3</issue><spage>282</spage><epage>284</epage><pages>282-284</pages><issn>0748-3007</issn><eissn>1096-0031</eissn><abstract>The use of majority‐rule consensus trees as a means of resolving ambiguity in phylogenetic analyses is investigated. It is shown to be an inappropriate method for this purpose.</abstract><cop>Oxford, UK</cop><pub>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</pub><doi>10.1111/j.1096-0031.2001.tb00124.x</doi><tpages>3</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext	fulltext
identifier	ISSN: 0748-3007
ispartof	Cladistics, 2001-09, Vol.17 (3), p.282-284
issn	0748-3007 1096-0031
language	eng
recordid	cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2610905616
source	Access via Wiley Online Library; Alma/SFX Local Collection
title	Majority Does Not Rule: The Trouble with Majority-Rule Consensus Trees
url	https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-20T22%3A58%3A45IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Majority%20Does%20Not%20Rule:%20The%20Trouble%20with%20Majority-Rule%20Consensus%20Trees&rft.jtitle=Cladistics&rft.au=Sharkey,%20Michael%20J.&rft.date=2001-09&rft.volume=17&rft.issue=3&rft.spage=282&rft.epage=284&rft.pages=282-284&rft.issn=0748-3007&rft.eissn=1096-0031&rft_id=info:doi/10.1111/j.1096-0031.2001.tb00124.x&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2610905616%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2610905616&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true