Phylogeny of the Metazoa Based on Morphological and 18S Ribosomal DNA Evidence
Cladistic analysis of traditional (i.e. morphological, developmental, ultrastructural) and molecular (18S rDNA) data sets (276+501 informative characters) provides a hypothesis about relationships of all meta‐zoan higher taxa. Monophyly of Metazoa, Epith‐eliozoa (= ‐03non‐Porifera), Triploblastica,...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Cladistics 1998-09, Vol.14 (3), p.249-285 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 285 |
---|---|
container_issue | 3 |
container_start_page | 249 |
container_title | Cladistics |
container_volume | 14 |
creator | Zrzavý, Jan Mihulka, Stanislav Kepka, Pavel Bezděk, Aleš Tietz, David |
description | Cladistic analysis of traditional (i.e. morphological, developmental, ultrastructural) and molecular (18S rDNA) data sets (276+501 informative characters) provides a hypothesis about relationships of all meta‐zoan higher taxa. Monophyly of Metazoa, Epith‐eliozoa (= ‐03non‐Porifera), Triploblastica, Mesozoa, Eutriploblastica (=Rhabditophora+Catenulida+“higher triploblasts”=Neotriploblastica, including Xeno‐ turbellida and Gnathostomulida), Rhabditophora, Syndermata (=“Rotifera”+Acanthocephala), Neotrichozoa (=Gastrotricha+Gnathostomulida), Nematozoa (=Nematoda+Nematomorpha), Panarthropoda (=Onychophora+Tardigrada+ Arthropoda), Cephalorhyncha, Deuterostomia, Ambulacralia (=Hemichordata+Echinodermata), Chordata, Phoronozoa (=Phoronida+“Brachiopoda”), Bryozoa, Trochozoa (=Eutrochozoa+Entoprocta+ Cycliophora), Eutrochozoa, and Chaetifera (=Annelida+ Pogonophora+Echiura) is strongly supported. Cnidaria (including Myxozoa), Ecdysozoa (=Cepha‐ lorhyncha + Nematozoa + Chaetognatha + Panarthropoda), Eucoelomata (=Bryozoa+Phoronozoa+Deuterostomia+Trochozoa, possibly including also Xenoturbellida), and Deuterostomia+Phoronozoa probably are monophyletic. Most traditional “phyla” are monophyletic, except for Porifera, Cnidaria (excluding Myxozoa), Platyhelminthes, Brachiopoda, and Rotifera. Three “hot” regions of the tree remain quite unresolved: basal Epitheliozoa, basal Triploblastica, and basal Neotriploblastica. A new phylogenetic classification of the Metazoa including 35 formally recognized phyla (Silicispongea, Calcispongea, Placozoa, Cnidaria, Ctenophora, Acoela, Nemertodermatida, Orthonecta, Rhombozoa, Rhabditophora, Catenulida, Syndermata, Gnathostomulida, Gastrotricha, Cephalorhyncha, Chaetognatha, Nematoda, Nematomorpha, Onychophora, Tardigrada, Arthropoda, Echinodermata, Hemichordata, Chordata, Phoronozoa, Bryozoa s. str., Xenoturbellida, Entoprocta, Cycliophora, Nemertea, Mollusca, Sipuncula, Echiura, Pogonophora, and Annelida) and few i ncertae sedis g roups (e.g. Myzostomida and Lobatocerebromorpha) is proposed. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1111/j.1096-0031.1998.tb00338.x |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2610413946</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2610413946</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3919-643e7881f9ceff632a5b5d431980226c58629e5f0271772a10bdb194e34190573</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqVkMtu2zAQRYmiReI8fqEguupGCl_io4sCjps4BRwnSFIU6IagpFEtVxZdUU7sfH1p2PU-3AzBuXM4OAh9oiSl8VzMU0qMTAjhNKXG6LTP453rdP0ODQ6t92hAlNAJJ0Qdo5MQ5oQQJpk5QsdcGJJpJgdoej_bNP43tBvsK9zPAN9C7169w5cuQIl9i299t5z5GKoL12DXlpjqR_xQ5z74RXz5Nh3iq-e6hLaAM_Shck2A8309RT-ur55GN8nkbvx9NJwkBTfUJFJwUFrTyhRQVZIzl-VZKTg1mjAmi0zHPSGrCFNUKeYoycucGgFc0Li54qfo84677PzfFYTeLupQQNO4FvwqWCYpEZQbIWP0yy5adD6EDiq77OqF6zaWErv1aed2K81updmtT7v3addx-OP-n1W-gPIw-l9gDHzdBV7qBjZvQNvRZMiEiYBkB6hDD-sDwHV_rFRcZfbndGwfMql_3Y_H9pL_A-k6kV0</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2610413946</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Phylogeny of the Metazoa Based on Morphological and 18S Ribosomal DNA Evidence</title><source>Wiley Online Library Journals Frontfile Complete</source><source>Alma/SFX Local Collection</source><creator>Zrzavý, Jan ; Mihulka, Stanislav ; Kepka, Pavel ; Bezděk, Aleš ; Tietz, David</creator><creatorcontrib>Zrzavý, Jan ; Mihulka, Stanislav ; Kepka, Pavel ; Bezděk, Aleš ; Tietz, David</creatorcontrib><description>Cladistic analysis of traditional (i.e. morphological, developmental, ultrastructural) and molecular (18S rDNA) data sets (276+501 informative characters) provides a hypothesis about relationships of all meta‐zoan higher taxa. Monophyly of Metazoa, Epith‐eliozoa (= ‐03non‐Porifera), Triploblastica, Mesozoa, Eutriploblastica (=Rhabditophora+Catenulida+“higher triploblasts”=Neotriploblastica, including Xeno‐ turbellida and Gnathostomulida), Rhabditophora, Syndermata (=“Rotifera”+Acanthocephala), Neotrichozoa (=Gastrotricha+Gnathostomulida), Nematozoa (=Nematoda+Nematomorpha), Panarthropoda (=Onychophora+Tardigrada+ Arthropoda), Cephalorhyncha, Deuterostomia, Ambulacralia (=Hemichordata+Echinodermata), Chordata, Phoronozoa (=Phoronida+“Brachiopoda”), Bryozoa, Trochozoa (=Eutrochozoa+Entoprocta+ Cycliophora), Eutrochozoa, and Chaetifera (=Annelida+ Pogonophora+Echiura) is strongly supported. Cnidaria (including Myxozoa), Ecdysozoa (=Cepha‐ lorhyncha + Nematozoa + Chaetognatha + Panarthropoda), Eucoelomata (=Bryozoa+Phoronozoa+Deuterostomia+Trochozoa, possibly including also Xenoturbellida), and Deuterostomia+Phoronozoa probably are monophyletic. Most traditional “phyla” are monophyletic, except for Porifera, Cnidaria (excluding Myxozoa), Platyhelminthes, Brachiopoda, and Rotifera. Three “hot” regions of the tree remain quite unresolved: basal Epitheliozoa, basal Triploblastica, and basal Neotriploblastica. A new phylogenetic classification of the Metazoa including 35 formally recognized phyla (Silicispongea, Calcispongea, Placozoa, Cnidaria, Ctenophora, Acoela, Nemertodermatida, Orthonecta, Rhombozoa, Rhabditophora, Catenulida, Syndermata, Gnathostomulida, Gastrotricha, Cephalorhyncha, Chaetognatha, Nematoda, Nematomorpha, Onychophora, Tardigrada, Arthropoda, Echinodermata, Hemichordata, Chordata, Phoronozoa, Bryozoa s. str., Xenoturbellida, Entoprocta, Cycliophora, Nemertea, Mollusca, Sipuncula, Echiura, Pogonophora, and Annelida) and few i ncertae sedis g roups (e.g. Myzostomida and Lobatocerebromorpha) is proposed.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0748-3007</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1096-0031</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1111/j.1096-0031.1998.tb00338.x</identifier><identifier>PMID: 34905826</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Oxford, UK: Blackwell Publishing Ltd</publisher><ispartof>Cladistics, 1998-09, Vol.14 (3), p.249-285</ispartof><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3919-643e7881f9ceff632a5b5d431980226c58629e5f0271772a10bdb194e34190573</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3919-643e7881f9ceff632a5b5d431980226c58629e5f0271772a10bdb194e34190573</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1111%2Fj.1096-0031.1998.tb00338.x$$EPDF$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1111%2Fj.1096-0031.1998.tb00338.x$$EHTML$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,777,781,1412,27905,27906,45555,45556</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34905826$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Zrzavý, Jan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mihulka, Stanislav</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kepka, Pavel</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bezděk, Aleš</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Tietz, David</creatorcontrib><title>Phylogeny of the Metazoa Based on Morphological and 18S Ribosomal DNA Evidence</title><title>Cladistics</title><addtitle>Cladistics</addtitle><description>Cladistic analysis of traditional (i.e. morphological, developmental, ultrastructural) and molecular (18S rDNA) data sets (276+501 informative characters) provides a hypothesis about relationships of all meta‐zoan higher taxa. Monophyly of Metazoa, Epith‐eliozoa (= ‐03non‐Porifera), Triploblastica, Mesozoa, Eutriploblastica (=Rhabditophora+Catenulida+“higher triploblasts”=Neotriploblastica, including Xeno‐ turbellida and Gnathostomulida), Rhabditophora, Syndermata (=“Rotifera”+Acanthocephala), Neotrichozoa (=Gastrotricha+Gnathostomulida), Nematozoa (=Nematoda+Nematomorpha), Panarthropoda (=Onychophora+Tardigrada+ Arthropoda), Cephalorhyncha, Deuterostomia, Ambulacralia (=Hemichordata+Echinodermata), Chordata, Phoronozoa (=Phoronida+“Brachiopoda”), Bryozoa, Trochozoa (=Eutrochozoa+Entoprocta+ Cycliophora), Eutrochozoa, and Chaetifera (=Annelida+ Pogonophora+Echiura) is strongly supported. Cnidaria (including Myxozoa), Ecdysozoa (=Cepha‐ lorhyncha + Nematozoa + Chaetognatha + Panarthropoda), Eucoelomata (=Bryozoa+Phoronozoa+Deuterostomia+Trochozoa, possibly including also Xenoturbellida), and Deuterostomia+Phoronozoa probably are monophyletic. Most traditional “phyla” are monophyletic, except for Porifera, Cnidaria (excluding Myxozoa), Platyhelminthes, Brachiopoda, and Rotifera. Three “hot” regions of the tree remain quite unresolved: basal Epitheliozoa, basal Triploblastica, and basal Neotriploblastica. A new phylogenetic classification of the Metazoa including 35 formally recognized phyla (Silicispongea, Calcispongea, Placozoa, Cnidaria, Ctenophora, Acoela, Nemertodermatida, Orthonecta, Rhombozoa, Rhabditophora, Catenulida, Syndermata, Gnathostomulida, Gastrotricha, Cephalorhyncha, Chaetognatha, Nematoda, Nematomorpha, Onychophora, Tardigrada, Arthropoda, Echinodermata, Hemichordata, Chordata, Phoronozoa, Bryozoa s. str., Xenoturbellida, Entoprocta, Cycliophora, Nemertea, Mollusca, Sipuncula, Echiura, Pogonophora, and Annelida) and few i ncertae sedis g roups (e.g. Myzostomida and Lobatocerebromorpha) is proposed.</description><issn>0748-3007</issn><issn>1096-0031</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>1998</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNqVkMtu2zAQRYmiReI8fqEguupGCl_io4sCjps4BRwnSFIU6IagpFEtVxZdUU7sfH1p2PU-3AzBuXM4OAh9oiSl8VzMU0qMTAjhNKXG6LTP453rdP0ODQ6t92hAlNAJJ0Qdo5MQ5oQQJpk5QsdcGJJpJgdoej_bNP43tBvsK9zPAN9C7169w5cuQIl9i299t5z5GKoL12DXlpjqR_xQ5z74RXz5Nh3iq-e6hLaAM_Shck2A8309RT-ur55GN8nkbvx9NJwkBTfUJFJwUFrTyhRQVZIzl-VZKTg1mjAmi0zHPSGrCFNUKeYoycucGgFc0Li54qfo84677PzfFYTeLupQQNO4FvwqWCYpEZQbIWP0yy5adD6EDiq77OqF6zaWErv1aed2K81updmtT7v3addx-OP-n1W-gPIw-l9gDHzdBV7qBjZvQNvRZMiEiYBkB6hDD-sDwHV_rFRcZfbndGwfMql_3Y_H9pL_A-k6kV0</recordid><startdate>199809</startdate><enddate>199809</enddate><creator>Zrzavý, Jan</creator><creator>Mihulka, Stanislav</creator><creator>Kepka, Pavel</creator><creator>Bezděk, Aleš</creator><creator>Tietz, David</creator><general>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</general><scope>BSCLL</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>199809</creationdate><title>Phylogeny of the Metazoa Based on Morphological and 18S Ribosomal DNA Evidence</title><author>Zrzavý, Jan ; Mihulka, Stanislav ; Kepka, Pavel ; Bezděk, Aleš ; Tietz, David</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c3919-643e7881f9ceff632a5b5d431980226c58629e5f0271772a10bdb194e34190573</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>1998</creationdate><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Zrzavý, Jan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mihulka, Stanislav</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kepka, Pavel</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bezděk, Aleš</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Tietz, David</creatorcontrib><collection>Istex</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Cladistics</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Zrzavý, Jan</au><au>Mihulka, Stanislav</au><au>Kepka, Pavel</au><au>Bezděk, Aleš</au><au>Tietz, David</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Phylogeny of the Metazoa Based on Morphological and 18S Ribosomal DNA Evidence</atitle><jtitle>Cladistics</jtitle><addtitle>Cladistics</addtitle><date>1998-09</date><risdate>1998</risdate><volume>14</volume><issue>3</issue><spage>249</spage><epage>285</epage><pages>249-285</pages><issn>0748-3007</issn><eissn>1096-0031</eissn><abstract>Cladistic analysis of traditional (i.e. morphological, developmental, ultrastructural) and molecular (18S rDNA) data sets (276+501 informative characters) provides a hypothesis about relationships of all meta‐zoan higher taxa. Monophyly of Metazoa, Epith‐eliozoa (= ‐03non‐Porifera), Triploblastica, Mesozoa, Eutriploblastica (=Rhabditophora+Catenulida+“higher triploblasts”=Neotriploblastica, including Xeno‐ turbellida and Gnathostomulida), Rhabditophora, Syndermata (=“Rotifera”+Acanthocephala), Neotrichozoa (=Gastrotricha+Gnathostomulida), Nematozoa (=Nematoda+Nematomorpha), Panarthropoda (=Onychophora+Tardigrada+ Arthropoda), Cephalorhyncha, Deuterostomia, Ambulacralia (=Hemichordata+Echinodermata), Chordata, Phoronozoa (=Phoronida+“Brachiopoda”), Bryozoa, Trochozoa (=Eutrochozoa+Entoprocta+ Cycliophora), Eutrochozoa, and Chaetifera (=Annelida+ Pogonophora+Echiura) is strongly supported. Cnidaria (including Myxozoa), Ecdysozoa (=Cepha‐ lorhyncha + Nematozoa + Chaetognatha + Panarthropoda), Eucoelomata (=Bryozoa+Phoronozoa+Deuterostomia+Trochozoa, possibly including also Xenoturbellida), and Deuterostomia+Phoronozoa probably are monophyletic. Most traditional “phyla” are monophyletic, except for Porifera, Cnidaria (excluding Myxozoa), Platyhelminthes, Brachiopoda, and Rotifera. Three “hot” regions of the tree remain quite unresolved: basal Epitheliozoa, basal Triploblastica, and basal Neotriploblastica. A new phylogenetic classification of the Metazoa including 35 formally recognized phyla (Silicispongea, Calcispongea, Placozoa, Cnidaria, Ctenophora, Acoela, Nemertodermatida, Orthonecta, Rhombozoa, Rhabditophora, Catenulida, Syndermata, Gnathostomulida, Gastrotricha, Cephalorhyncha, Chaetognatha, Nematoda, Nematomorpha, Onychophora, Tardigrada, Arthropoda, Echinodermata, Hemichordata, Chordata, Phoronozoa, Bryozoa s. str., Xenoturbellida, Entoprocta, Cycliophora, Nemertea, Mollusca, Sipuncula, Echiura, Pogonophora, and Annelida) and few i ncertae sedis g roups (e.g. Myzostomida and Lobatocerebromorpha) is proposed.</abstract><cop>Oxford, UK</cop><pub>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</pub><pmid>34905826</pmid><doi>10.1111/j.1096-0031.1998.tb00338.x</doi><tpages>37</tpages></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0748-3007 |
ispartof | Cladistics, 1998-09, Vol.14 (3), p.249-285 |
issn | 0748-3007 1096-0031 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2610413946 |
source | Wiley Online Library Journals Frontfile Complete; Alma/SFX Local Collection |
title | Phylogeny of the Metazoa Based on Morphological and 18S Ribosomal DNA Evidence |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-20T07%3A46%3A22IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Phylogeny%20of%20the%20Metazoa%20Based%20on%20Morphological%20and%2018S%20Ribosomal%20DNA%20Evidence&rft.jtitle=Cladistics&rft.au=Zrzav%C3%BD,%20Jan&rft.date=1998-09&rft.volume=14&rft.issue=3&rft.spage=249&rft.epage=285&rft.pages=249-285&rft.issn=0748-3007&rft.eissn=1096-0031&rft_id=info:doi/10.1111/j.1096-0031.1998.tb00338.x&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2610413946%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2610413946&rft_id=info:pmid/34905826&rfr_iscdi=true |