Phylogeny of the Metazoa Based on Morphological and 18S Ribosomal DNA Evidence

Cladistic analysis of traditional (i.e. morphological, developmental, ultrastructural) and molecular (18S rDNA) data sets (276+501 informative characters) provides a hypothesis about relationships of all meta‐zoan higher taxa. Monophyly of Metazoa, Epith‐eliozoa (= ‐03non‐Porifera), Triploblastica,...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Cladistics 1998-09, Vol.14 (3), p.249-285
Hauptverfasser: Zrzavý, Jan, Mihulka, Stanislav, Kepka, Pavel, Bezděk, Aleš, Tietz, David
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 285
container_issue 3
container_start_page 249
container_title Cladistics
container_volume 14
creator Zrzavý, Jan
Mihulka, Stanislav
Kepka, Pavel
Bezděk, Aleš
Tietz, David
description Cladistic analysis of traditional (i.e. morphological, developmental, ultrastructural) and molecular (18S rDNA) data sets (276+501 informative characters) provides a hypothesis about relationships of all meta‐zoan higher taxa. Monophyly of Metazoa, Epith‐eliozoa (= ‐03non‐Porifera), Triploblastica, Mesozoa, Eutriploblastica (=Rhabditophora+Catenulida+“higher triploblasts”=Neotriploblastica, including Xeno‐ turbellida and Gnathostomulida), Rhabditophora, Syndermata (=“Rotifera”+Acanthocephala), Neotrichozoa (=Gastrotricha+Gnathostomulida), Nematozoa (=Nematoda+Nematomorpha), Panarthropoda (=Onychophora+Tardigrada+ Arthropoda), Cephalorhyncha, Deuterostomia, Ambulacralia (=Hemichordata+Echinodermata), Chordata, Phoronozoa (=Phoronida+“Brachiopoda”), Bryozoa, Trochozoa (=Eutrochozoa+Entoprocta+ Cycliophora), Eutrochozoa, and Chaetifera (=Annelida+ Pogonophora+Echiura) is strongly supported. Cnidaria (including Myxozoa), Ecdysozoa (=Cepha‐ lorhyncha + Nematozoa + Chaetognatha + Panarthropoda), Eucoelomata (=Bryozoa+Phoronozoa+Deuterostomia+Trochozoa, possibly including also Xenoturbellida), and Deuterostomia+Phoronozoa probably are monophyletic. Most traditional “phyla” are monophyletic, except for Porifera, Cnidaria (excluding Myxozoa), Platyhelminthes, Brachiopoda, and Rotifera. Three “hot” regions of the tree remain quite unresolved: basal Epitheliozoa, basal Triploblastica, and basal Neotriploblastica. A new phylogenetic classification of the Metazoa including 35 formally recognized phyla (Silicispongea, Calcispongea, Placozoa, Cnidaria, Ctenophora, Acoela, Nemertodermatida, Orthonecta, Rhombozoa, Rhabditophora, Catenulida, Syndermata, Gnathostomulida, Gastrotricha, Cephalorhyncha, Chaetognatha, Nematoda, Nematomorpha, Onychophora, Tardigrada, Arthropoda, Echinodermata, Hemichordata, Chordata, Phoronozoa, Bryozoa s. str., Xenoturbellida, Entoprocta, Cycliophora, Nemertea, Mollusca, Sipuncula, Echiura, Pogonophora, and Annelida) and few i ncertae sedis g roups (e.g. Myzostomida and Lobatocerebromorpha) is proposed.
doi_str_mv 10.1111/j.1096-0031.1998.tb00338.x
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2610413946</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2610413946</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3919-643e7881f9ceff632a5b5d431980226c58629e5f0271772a10bdb194e34190573</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqVkMtu2zAQRYmiReI8fqEguupGCl_io4sCjps4BRwnSFIU6IagpFEtVxZdUU7sfH1p2PU-3AzBuXM4OAh9oiSl8VzMU0qMTAjhNKXG6LTP453rdP0ODQ6t92hAlNAJJ0Qdo5MQ5oQQJpk5QsdcGJJpJgdoej_bNP43tBvsK9zPAN9C7169w5cuQIl9i299t5z5GKoL12DXlpjqR_xQ5z74RXz5Nh3iq-e6hLaAM_Shck2A8309RT-ur55GN8nkbvx9NJwkBTfUJFJwUFrTyhRQVZIzl-VZKTg1mjAmi0zHPSGrCFNUKeYoycucGgFc0Li54qfo84677PzfFYTeLupQQNO4FvwqWCYpEZQbIWP0yy5adD6EDiq77OqF6zaWErv1aed2K81updmtT7v3addx-OP-n1W-gPIw-l9gDHzdBV7qBjZvQNvRZMiEiYBkB6hDD-sDwHV_rFRcZfbndGwfMql_3Y_H9pL_A-k6kV0</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2610413946</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Phylogeny of the Metazoa Based on Morphological and 18S Ribosomal DNA Evidence</title><source>Wiley Online Library Journals Frontfile Complete</source><source>Alma/SFX Local Collection</source><creator>Zrzavý, Jan ; Mihulka, Stanislav ; Kepka, Pavel ; Bezděk, Aleš ; Tietz, David</creator><creatorcontrib>Zrzavý, Jan ; Mihulka, Stanislav ; Kepka, Pavel ; Bezděk, Aleš ; Tietz, David</creatorcontrib><description>Cladistic analysis of traditional (i.e. morphological, developmental, ultrastructural) and molecular (18S rDNA) data sets (276+501 informative characters) provides a hypothesis about relationships of all meta‐zoan higher taxa. Monophyly of Metazoa, Epith‐eliozoa (= ‐03non‐Porifera), Triploblastica, Mesozoa, Eutriploblastica (=Rhabditophora+Catenulida+“higher triploblasts”=Neotriploblastica, including Xeno‐ turbellida and Gnathostomulida), Rhabditophora, Syndermata (=“Rotifera”+Acanthocephala), Neotrichozoa (=Gastrotricha+Gnathostomulida), Nematozoa (=Nematoda+Nematomorpha), Panarthropoda (=Onychophora+Tardigrada+ Arthropoda), Cephalorhyncha, Deuterostomia, Ambulacralia (=Hemichordata+Echinodermata), Chordata, Phoronozoa (=Phoronida+“Brachiopoda”), Bryozoa, Trochozoa (=Eutrochozoa+Entoprocta+ Cycliophora), Eutrochozoa, and Chaetifera (=Annelida+ Pogonophora+Echiura) is strongly supported. Cnidaria (including Myxozoa), Ecdysozoa (=Cepha‐ lorhyncha + Nematozoa + Chaetognatha + Panarthropoda), Eucoelomata (=Bryozoa+Phoronozoa+Deuterostomia+Trochozoa, possibly including also Xenoturbellida), and Deuterostomia+Phoronozoa probably are monophyletic. Most traditional “phyla” are monophyletic, except for Porifera, Cnidaria (excluding Myxozoa), Platyhelminthes, Brachiopoda, and Rotifera. Three “hot” regions of the tree remain quite unresolved: basal Epitheliozoa, basal Triploblastica, and basal Neotriploblastica. A new phylogenetic classification of the Metazoa including 35 formally recognized phyla (Silicispongea, Calcispongea, Placozoa, Cnidaria, Ctenophora, Acoela, Nemertodermatida, Orthonecta, Rhombozoa, Rhabditophora, Catenulida, Syndermata, Gnathostomulida, Gastrotricha, Cephalorhyncha, Chaetognatha, Nematoda, Nematomorpha, Onychophora, Tardigrada, Arthropoda, Echinodermata, Hemichordata, Chordata, Phoronozoa, Bryozoa s. str., Xenoturbellida, Entoprocta, Cycliophora, Nemertea, Mollusca, Sipuncula, Echiura, Pogonophora, and Annelida) and few i ncertae sedis g roups (e.g. Myzostomida and Lobatocerebromorpha) is proposed.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0748-3007</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1096-0031</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1111/j.1096-0031.1998.tb00338.x</identifier><identifier>PMID: 34905826</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Oxford, UK: Blackwell Publishing Ltd</publisher><ispartof>Cladistics, 1998-09, Vol.14 (3), p.249-285</ispartof><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3919-643e7881f9ceff632a5b5d431980226c58629e5f0271772a10bdb194e34190573</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3919-643e7881f9ceff632a5b5d431980226c58629e5f0271772a10bdb194e34190573</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1111%2Fj.1096-0031.1998.tb00338.x$$EPDF$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1111%2Fj.1096-0031.1998.tb00338.x$$EHTML$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,777,781,1412,27905,27906,45555,45556</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34905826$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Zrzavý, Jan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mihulka, Stanislav</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kepka, Pavel</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bezděk, Aleš</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Tietz, David</creatorcontrib><title>Phylogeny of the Metazoa Based on Morphological and 18S Ribosomal DNA Evidence</title><title>Cladistics</title><addtitle>Cladistics</addtitle><description>Cladistic analysis of traditional (i.e. morphological, developmental, ultrastructural) and molecular (18S rDNA) data sets (276+501 informative characters) provides a hypothesis about relationships of all meta‐zoan higher taxa. Monophyly of Metazoa, Epith‐eliozoa (= ‐03non‐Porifera), Triploblastica, Mesozoa, Eutriploblastica (=Rhabditophora+Catenulida+“higher triploblasts”=Neotriploblastica, including Xeno‐ turbellida and Gnathostomulida), Rhabditophora, Syndermata (=“Rotifera”+Acanthocephala), Neotrichozoa (=Gastrotricha+Gnathostomulida), Nematozoa (=Nematoda+Nematomorpha), Panarthropoda (=Onychophora+Tardigrada+ Arthropoda), Cephalorhyncha, Deuterostomia, Ambulacralia (=Hemichordata+Echinodermata), Chordata, Phoronozoa (=Phoronida+“Brachiopoda”), Bryozoa, Trochozoa (=Eutrochozoa+Entoprocta+ Cycliophora), Eutrochozoa, and Chaetifera (=Annelida+ Pogonophora+Echiura) is strongly supported. Cnidaria (including Myxozoa), Ecdysozoa (=Cepha‐ lorhyncha + Nematozoa + Chaetognatha + Panarthropoda), Eucoelomata (=Bryozoa+Phoronozoa+Deuterostomia+Trochozoa, possibly including also Xenoturbellida), and Deuterostomia+Phoronozoa probably are monophyletic. Most traditional “phyla” are monophyletic, except for Porifera, Cnidaria (excluding Myxozoa), Platyhelminthes, Brachiopoda, and Rotifera. Three “hot” regions of the tree remain quite unresolved: basal Epitheliozoa, basal Triploblastica, and basal Neotriploblastica. A new phylogenetic classification of the Metazoa including 35 formally recognized phyla (Silicispongea, Calcispongea, Placozoa, Cnidaria, Ctenophora, Acoela, Nemertodermatida, Orthonecta, Rhombozoa, Rhabditophora, Catenulida, Syndermata, Gnathostomulida, Gastrotricha, Cephalorhyncha, Chaetognatha, Nematoda, Nematomorpha, Onychophora, Tardigrada, Arthropoda, Echinodermata, Hemichordata, Chordata, Phoronozoa, Bryozoa s. str., Xenoturbellida, Entoprocta, Cycliophora, Nemertea, Mollusca, Sipuncula, Echiura, Pogonophora, and Annelida) and few i ncertae sedis g roups (e.g. Myzostomida and Lobatocerebromorpha) is proposed.</description><issn>0748-3007</issn><issn>1096-0031</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>1998</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNqVkMtu2zAQRYmiReI8fqEguupGCl_io4sCjps4BRwnSFIU6IagpFEtVxZdUU7sfH1p2PU-3AzBuXM4OAh9oiSl8VzMU0qMTAjhNKXG6LTP453rdP0ODQ6t92hAlNAJJ0Qdo5MQ5oQQJpk5QsdcGJJpJgdoej_bNP43tBvsK9zPAN9C7169w5cuQIl9i299t5z5GKoL12DXlpjqR_xQ5z74RXz5Nh3iq-e6hLaAM_Shck2A8309RT-ur55GN8nkbvx9NJwkBTfUJFJwUFrTyhRQVZIzl-VZKTg1mjAmi0zHPSGrCFNUKeYoycucGgFc0Li54qfo84677PzfFYTeLupQQNO4FvwqWCYpEZQbIWP0yy5adD6EDiq77OqF6zaWErv1aed2K81updmtT7v3addx-OP-n1W-gPIw-l9gDHzdBV7qBjZvQNvRZMiEiYBkB6hDD-sDwHV_rFRcZfbndGwfMql_3Y_H9pL_A-k6kV0</recordid><startdate>199809</startdate><enddate>199809</enddate><creator>Zrzavý, Jan</creator><creator>Mihulka, Stanislav</creator><creator>Kepka, Pavel</creator><creator>Bezděk, Aleš</creator><creator>Tietz, David</creator><general>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</general><scope>BSCLL</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>199809</creationdate><title>Phylogeny of the Metazoa Based on Morphological and 18S Ribosomal DNA Evidence</title><author>Zrzavý, Jan ; Mihulka, Stanislav ; Kepka, Pavel ; Bezděk, Aleš ; Tietz, David</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c3919-643e7881f9ceff632a5b5d431980226c58629e5f0271772a10bdb194e34190573</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>1998</creationdate><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Zrzavý, Jan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mihulka, Stanislav</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kepka, Pavel</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bezděk, Aleš</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Tietz, David</creatorcontrib><collection>Istex</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Cladistics</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Zrzavý, Jan</au><au>Mihulka, Stanislav</au><au>Kepka, Pavel</au><au>Bezděk, Aleš</au><au>Tietz, David</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Phylogeny of the Metazoa Based on Morphological and 18S Ribosomal DNA Evidence</atitle><jtitle>Cladistics</jtitle><addtitle>Cladistics</addtitle><date>1998-09</date><risdate>1998</risdate><volume>14</volume><issue>3</issue><spage>249</spage><epage>285</epage><pages>249-285</pages><issn>0748-3007</issn><eissn>1096-0031</eissn><abstract>Cladistic analysis of traditional (i.e. morphological, developmental, ultrastructural) and molecular (18S rDNA) data sets (276+501 informative characters) provides a hypothesis about relationships of all meta‐zoan higher taxa. Monophyly of Metazoa, Epith‐eliozoa (= ‐03non‐Porifera), Triploblastica, Mesozoa, Eutriploblastica (=Rhabditophora+Catenulida+“higher triploblasts”=Neotriploblastica, including Xeno‐ turbellida and Gnathostomulida), Rhabditophora, Syndermata (=“Rotifera”+Acanthocephala), Neotrichozoa (=Gastrotricha+Gnathostomulida), Nematozoa (=Nematoda+Nematomorpha), Panarthropoda (=Onychophora+Tardigrada+ Arthropoda), Cephalorhyncha, Deuterostomia, Ambulacralia (=Hemichordata+Echinodermata), Chordata, Phoronozoa (=Phoronida+“Brachiopoda”), Bryozoa, Trochozoa (=Eutrochozoa+Entoprocta+ Cycliophora), Eutrochozoa, and Chaetifera (=Annelida+ Pogonophora+Echiura) is strongly supported. Cnidaria (including Myxozoa), Ecdysozoa (=Cepha‐ lorhyncha + Nematozoa + Chaetognatha + Panarthropoda), Eucoelomata (=Bryozoa+Phoronozoa+Deuterostomia+Trochozoa, possibly including also Xenoturbellida), and Deuterostomia+Phoronozoa probably are monophyletic. Most traditional “phyla” are monophyletic, except for Porifera, Cnidaria (excluding Myxozoa), Platyhelminthes, Brachiopoda, and Rotifera. Three “hot” regions of the tree remain quite unresolved: basal Epitheliozoa, basal Triploblastica, and basal Neotriploblastica. A new phylogenetic classification of the Metazoa including 35 formally recognized phyla (Silicispongea, Calcispongea, Placozoa, Cnidaria, Ctenophora, Acoela, Nemertodermatida, Orthonecta, Rhombozoa, Rhabditophora, Catenulida, Syndermata, Gnathostomulida, Gastrotricha, Cephalorhyncha, Chaetognatha, Nematoda, Nematomorpha, Onychophora, Tardigrada, Arthropoda, Echinodermata, Hemichordata, Chordata, Phoronozoa, Bryozoa s. str., Xenoturbellida, Entoprocta, Cycliophora, Nemertea, Mollusca, Sipuncula, Echiura, Pogonophora, and Annelida) and few i ncertae sedis g roups (e.g. Myzostomida and Lobatocerebromorpha) is proposed.</abstract><cop>Oxford, UK</cop><pub>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</pub><pmid>34905826</pmid><doi>10.1111/j.1096-0031.1998.tb00338.x</doi><tpages>37</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0748-3007
ispartof Cladistics, 1998-09, Vol.14 (3), p.249-285
issn 0748-3007
1096-0031
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2610413946
source Wiley Online Library Journals Frontfile Complete; Alma/SFX Local Collection
title Phylogeny of the Metazoa Based on Morphological and 18S Ribosomal DNA Evidence
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-20T07%3A46%3A22IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Phylogeny%20of%20the%20Metazoa%20Based%20on%20Morphological%20and%2018S%20Ribosomal%20DNA%20Evidence&rft.jtitle=Cladistics&rft.au=Zrzav%C3%BD,%20Jan&rft.date=1998-09&rft.volume=14&rft.issue=3&rft.spage=249&rft.epage=285&rft.pages=249-285&rft.issn=0748-3007&rft.eissn=1096-0031&rft_id=info:doi/10.1111/j.1096-0031.1998.tb00338.x&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2610413946%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2610413946&rft_id=info:pmid/34905826&rfr_iscdi=true