Demographic, clinical, and operative risk factors associated with postoperative adjacent segment disease in patients undergoing lumbar spine fusions: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Adjacent segment disease (ASD) is a potential complication following lumbar spinal fusion. This study aimed to demonstrate the demographic, clinical, and operative risk factors associated with ASD development following lumbar fusion. Systematic review and meta-analysis. We identified 35 studies that...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:The spine journal 2022-06, Vol.22 (6), p.1038-1069
Hauptverfasser: Mesregah, Mohamed Kamal, Yoshida, Brandon, Lashkari, Nassim, Abedi, Aidin, Meisel, Hans-Joerg, Diwan, Ashish, Hsieh, Patrick, Wang, Jeffrey C., Buser, Zorica, Yoon, S. Tim
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:Adjacent segment disease (ASD) is a potential complication following lumbar spinal fusion. This study aimed to demonstrate the demographic, clinical, and operative risk factors associated with ASD development following lumbar fusion. Systematic review and meta-analysis. We identified 35 studies that reported risk factors for ASD, with a total number of 7,374 patients who had lumbar spine fusion. We investigated the demographic, clinical, and operative risk factors for ASD after lumbar fusion. A literature search was done using PubMed, Embase, Medline, Scopus, and the Cochrane library databases from inception to December 2019. The methodological index for non‐randomized studies (MINORS) criteria was used to assess the methodological quality of the included studies. A meta-analysis was done to calculate the odds ratio (OR) with the 95% confidence interval (CI) for dichotomous data and mean difference (MD) with 95% CI for continuous data. Thirty-five studies were included in the qualitative analysis, and 22 studies were included in the meta-analyses. The mean quality score based on the MINORS criteria was 12.4±1.9 (range, 8–16) points. Significant risk factors included higher preoperative body mass index (BMI) (mean difference [MD]=1.97 kg/m2; 95% confidence interval [CI]=1.49–2.45; p
ISSN:1529-9430
1878-1632
DOI:10.1016/j.spinee.2021.12.002