Unilateral breast reconstruction using double transverse upper gracilis (TUG) flaps
When the deep inferior epigastric perforator (DIEP) flap is unavailable, autologous reconstruction of a moderate-to-large breast presents a surgical challenge. We retrospectively review our experience of unilateral breast reconstruction using double transverse upper gracilis (TUG) flaps and highligh...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Journal of plastic, reconstructive & aesthetic surgery reconstructive & aesthetic surgery, 2022-03, Vol.75 (3), p.1164-1170 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 1170 |
---|---|
container_issue | 3 |
container_start_page | 1164 |
container_title | Journal of plastic, reconstructive & aesthetic surgery |
container_volume | 75 |
creator | PANTELIDES, Nicholas M JICA, Romulus CI PATEL, Nakul G MORGAN, Mary RAMAKRISHNAN, Venkat V |
description | When the deep inferior epigastric perforator (DIEP) flap is unavailable, autologous reconstruction of a moderate-to-large breast presents a surgical challenge. We retrospectively review our experience of unilateral breast reconstruction using double transverse upper gracilis (TUG) flaps and highlight specific technical considerations.
Thirty-four patients underwent double TUG flaps for unilateral breast reconstruction between 2012 and 2020. The average patient age was 50 years and the average body mass index (BMI) was 23.1 kg/m2. In all cases, the indication for surgery was breast cancer: 31 patients had immediate reconstruction, 11 had simultaneous axillary surgery and eight had primary contralateral symmetrising surgery.
Of the 68 TUG flaps, 67 (98.5%) were successful. The mean operative time was 5 h 50 min (195–460 min) and the mean combined flap weight was 551 g (279–916 g). Eight patients returned to the operating theatre in the early post-operative period and five patients underwent secondary lipofilling to address contour deformities.
Most commonly (n = 22), the flaps were oriented horizontally/obliquely, with one flap anastomosed medially to the internal mammary axis and the other anastomosed lateral to the subscapular system. The internal mammary artery perforators and serratus anterior artery provided the best vessel calibre match with the TUG vessels.
Double TUG reconstruction is a safe and reliable option for unilateral breast reconstruction and is an important option when the DIEP flap is unavailable. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1016/j.bjps.2021.11.010 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2609459235</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S1748681521005544</els_id><sourcerecordid>2609459235</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c356t-257d6efae37dbd5e41c86fe4e3982593533a781b4aedf9e177db79dc9b5af4533</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kE1LxDAQhoMofqz-AQ-Sox5akyZpG_Aii18geNA9hzSZSpZuWzOt4L83y6pHTzMwz_vCPIScc5Zzxsvrdd6sR8wLVvCc85xxtkeOeV3VGVNC76e9knVW1lwdkRPENWNScKkOyZGQtS6ZVMfkddWHzk4QbUebCBYnGsENPU5xdlMYejpj6N-pH-amAzpF2-MnRAQ6jyNE-h6tC11Aevm2eriibWdHPCUHre0Qzn7mgqzu796Wj9nzy8PT8vY5c0KVU1aoypfQWhCVb7wCyV1dtiBB6LpQWighbFXzRlrwrQZeJazS3ulG2Vam64Jc7nrHOHzMgJPZBHTQdbaHYUZTlExLpYvUtCDFDnVxQIzQmjGGjY1fhjOzlWnWZivTbGUazk2SmUIXP_1zswH_F_m1l4CbHQDpy88A0aAL0DvwIUmcjB_Cf_3fs52G5w</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2609459235</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Unilateral breast reconstruction using double transverse upper gracilis (TUG) flaps</title><source>Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals Complete - AutoHoldings</source><creator>PANTELIDES, Nicholas M ; JICA, Romulus CI ; PATEL, Nakul G ; MORGAN, Mary ; RAMAKRISHNAN, Venkat V</creator><creatorcontrib>PANTELIDES, Nicholas M ; JICA, Romulus CI ; PATEL, Nakul G ; MORGAN, Mary ; RAMAKRISHNAN, Venkat V</creatorcontrib><description>When the deep inferior epigastric perforator (DIEP) flap is unavailable, autologous reconstruction of a moderate-to-large breast presents a surgical challenge. We retrospectively review our experience of unilateral breast reconstruction using double transverse upper gracilis (TUG) flaps and highlight specific technical considerations.
Thirty-four patients underwent double TUG flaps for unilateral breast reconstruction between 2012 and 2020. The average patient age was 50 years and the average body mass index (BMI) was 23.1 kg/m2. In all cases, the indication for surgery was breast cancer: 31 patients had immediate reconstruction, 11 had simultaneous axillary surgery and eight had primary contralateral symmetrising surgery.
Of the 68 TUG flaps, 67 (98.5%) were successful. The mean operative time was 5 h 50 min (195–460 min) and the mean combined flap weight was 551 g (279–916 g). Eight patients returned to the operating theatre in the early post-operative period and five patients underwent secondary lipofilling to address contour deformities.
Most commonly (n = 22), the flaps were oriented horizontally/obliquely, with one flap anastomosed medially to the internal mammary axis and the other anastomosed lateral to the subscapular system. The internal mammary artery perforators and serratus anterior artery provided the best vessel calibre match with the TUG vessels.
Double TUG reconstruction is a safe and reliable option for unilateral breast reconstruction and is an important option when the DIEP flap is unavailable.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1748-6815</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1878-0539</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.bjps.2021.11.010</identifier><identifier>PMID: 34896045</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Netherlands: Elsevier Ltd</publisher><subject>Breast reconstruction ; Double TUG ; TMG ; Transverse myocutaneous gracilis ; Transverse upper gracilis ; TUG</subject><ispartof>Journal of plastic, reconstructive & aesthetic surgery, 2022-03, Vol.75 (3), p.1164-1170</ispartof><rights>2021 Elsevier Ltd</rights><rights>Copyright © 2021 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c356t-257d6efae37dbd5e41c86fe4e3982593533a781b4aedf9e177db79dc9b5af4533</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c356t-257d6efae37dbd5e41c86fe4e3982593533a781b4aedf9e177db79dc9b5af4533</cites><orcidid>0000-0002-7608-4074 ; 0000-0002-1289-5599 ; 0000-0003-0623-9912 ; 0000-0002-5134-946X</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.bjps.2021.11.010$$EHTML$$P50$$Gelsevier$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,778,782,3539,27913,27914,45984</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34896045$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>PANTELIDES, Nicholas M</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>JICA, Romulus CI</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>PATEL, Nakul G</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>MORGAN, Mary</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>RAMAKRISHNAN, Venkat V</creatorcontrib><title>Unilateral breast reconstruction using double transverse upper gracilis (TUG) flaps</title><title>Journal of plastic, reconstructive & aesthetic surgery</title><addtitle>J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg</addtitle><description>When the deep inferior epigastric perforator (DIEP) flap is unavailable, autologous reconstruction of a moderate-to-large breast presents a surgical challenge. We retrospectively review our experience of unilateral breast reconstruction using double transverse upper gracilis (TUG) flaps and highlight specific technical considerations.
Thirty-four patients underwent double TUG flaps for unilateral breast reconstruction between 2012 and 2020. The average patient age was 50 years and the average body mass index (BMI) was 23.1 kg/m2. In all cases, the indication for surgery was breast cancer: 31 patients had immediate reconstruction, 11 had simultaneous axillary surgery and eight had primary contralateral symmetrising surgery.
Of the 68 TUG flaps, 67 (98.5%) were successful. The mean operative time was 5 h 50 min (195–460 min) and the mean combined flap weight was 551 g (279–916 g). Eight patients returned to the operating theatre in the early post-operative period and five patients underwent secondary lipofilling to address contour deformities.
Most commonly (n = 22), the flaps were oriented horizontally/obliquely, with one flap anastomosed medially to the internal mammary axis and the other anastomosed lateral to the subscapular system. The internal mammary artery perforators and serratus anterior artery provided the best vessel calibre match with the TUG vessels.
Double TUG reconstruction is a safe and reliable option for unilateral breast reconstruction and is an important option when the DIEP flap is unavailable.</description><subject>Breast reconstruction</subject><subject>Double TUG</subject><subject>TMG</subject><subject>Transverse myocutaneous gracilis</subject><subject>Transverse upper gracilis</subject><subject>TUG</subject><issn>1748-6815</issn><issn>1878-0539</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2022</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNp9kE1LxDAQhoMofqz-AQ-Sox5akyZpG_Aii18geNA9hzSZSpZuWzOt4L83y6pHTzMwz_vCPIScc5Zzxsvrdd6sR8wLVvCc85xxtkeOeV3VGVNC76e9knVW1lwdkRPENWNScKkOyZGQtS6ZVMfkddWHzk4QbUebCBYnGsENPU5xdlMYejpj6N-pH-amAzpF2-MnRAQ6jyNE-h6tC11Aevm2eriibWdHPCUHre0Qzn7mgqzu796Wj9nzy8PT8vY5c0KVU1aoypfQWhCVb7wCyV1dtiBB6LpQWighbFXzRlrwrQZeJazS3ulG2Vam64Jc7nrHOHzMgJPZBHTQdbaHYUZTlExLpYvUtCDFDnVxQIzQmjGGjY1fhjOzlWnWZivTbGUazk2SmUIXP_1zswH_F_m1l4CbHQDpy88A0aAL0DvwIUmcjB_Cf_3fs52G5w</recordid><startdate>20220301</startdate><enddate>20220301</enddate><creator>PANTELIDES, Nicholas M</creator><creator>JICA, Romulus CI</creator><creator>PATEL, Nakul G</creator><creator>MORGAN, Mary</creator><creator>RAMAKRISHNAN, Venkat V</creator><general>Elsevier Ltd</general><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7608-4074</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1289-5599</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0623-9912</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5134-946X</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20220301</creationdate><title>Unilateral breast reconstruction using double transverse upper gracilis (TUG) flaps</title><author>PANTELIDES, Nicholas M ; JICA, Romulus CI ; PATEL, Nakul G ; MORGAN, Mary ; RAMAKRISHNAN, Venkat V</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c356t-257d6efae37dbd5e41c86fe4e3982593533a781b4aedf9e177db79dc9b5af4533</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2022</creationdate><topic>Breast reconstruction</topic><topic>Double TUG</topic><topic>TMG</topic><topic>Transverse myocutaneous gracilis</topic><topic>Transverse upper gracilis</topic><topic>TUG</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>PANTELIDES, Nicholas M</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>JICA, Romulus CI</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>PATEL, Nakul G</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>MORGAN, Mary</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>RAMAKRISHNAN, Venkat V</creatorcontrib><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Journal of plastic, reconstructive & aesthetic surgery</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>PANTELIDES, Nicholas M</au><au>JICA, Romulus CI</au><au>PATEL, Nakul G</au><au>MORGAN, Mary</au><au>RAMAKRISHNAN, Venkat V</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Unilateral breast reconstruction using double transverse upper gracilis (TUG) flaps</atitle><jtitle>Journal of plastic, reconstructive & aesthetic surgery</jtitle><addtitle>J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg</addtitle><date>2022-03-01</date><risdate>2022</risdate><volume>75</volume><issue>3</issue><spage>1164</spage><epage>1170</epage><pages>1164-1170</pages><issn>1748-6815</issn><eissn>1878-0539</eissn><abstract>When the deep inferior epigastric perforator (DIEP) flap is unavailable, autologous reconstruction of a moderate-to-large breast presents a surgical challenge. We retrospectively review our experience of unilateral breast reconstruction using double transverse upper gracilis (TUG) flaps and highlight specific technical considerations.
Thirty-four patients underwent double TUG flaps for unilateral breast reconstruction between 2012 and 2020. The average patient age was 50 years and the average body mass index (BMI) was 23.1 kg/m2. In all cases, the indication for surgery was breast cancer: 31 patients had immediate reconstruction, 11 had simultaneous axillary surgery and eight had primary contralateral symmetrising surgery.
Of the 68 TUG flaps, 67 (98.5%) were successful. The mean operative time was 5 h 50 min (195–460 min) and the mean combined flap weight was 551 g (279–916 g). Eight patients returned to the operating theatre in the early post-operative period and five patients underwent secondary lipofilling to address contour deformities.
Most commonly (n = 22), the flaps were oriented horizontally/obliquely, with one flap anastomosed medially to the internal mammary axis and the other anastomosed lateral to the subscapular system. The internal mammary artery perforators and serratus anterior artery provided the best vessel calibre match with the TUG vessels.
Double TUG reconstruction is a safe and reliable option for unilateral breast reconstruction and is an important option when the DIEP flap is unavailable.</abstract><cop>Netherlands</cop><pub>Elsevier Ltd</pub><pmid>34896045</pmid><doi>10.1016/j.bjps.2021.11.010</doi><tpages>7</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7608-4074</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1289-5599</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0623-9912</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5134-946X</orcidid></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 1748-6815 |
ispartof | Journal of plastic, reconstructive & aesthetic surgery, 2022-03, Vol.75 (3), p.1164-1170 |
issn | 1748-6815 1878-0539 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2609459235 |
source | Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals Complete - AutoHoldings |
subjects | Breast reconstruction Double TUG TMG Transverse myocutaneous gracilis Transverse upper gracilis TUG |
title | Unilateral breast reconstruction using double transverse upper gracilis (TUG) flaps |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-15T08%3A43%3A06IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Unilateral%20breast%20reconstruction%20using%20double%20transverse%20upper%20gracilis%20(TUG)%20flaps&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20plastic,%20reconstructive%20&%20aesthetic%20surgery&rft.au=PANTELIDES,%20Nicholas%20M&rft.date=2022-03-01&rft.volume=75&rft.issue=3&rft.spage=1164&rft.epage=1170&rft.pages=1164-1170&rft.issn=1748-6815&rft.eissn=1878-0539&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.bjps.2021.11.010&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2609459235%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2609459235&rft_id=info:pmid/34896045&rft_els_id=S1748681521005544&rfr_iscdi=true |