Unilateral breast reconstruction using double transverse upper gracilis (TUG) flaps

When the deep inferior epigastric perforator (DIEP) flap is unavailable, autologous reconstruction of a moderate-to-large breast presents a surgical challenge. We retrospectively review our experience of unilateral breast reconstruction using double transverse upper gracilis (TUG) flaps and highligh...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Journal of plastic, reconstructive & aesthetic surgery reconstructive & aesthetic surgery, 2022-03, Vol.75 (3), p.1164-1170
Hauptverfasser: PANTELIDES, Nicholas M, JICA, Romulus CI, PATEL, Nakul G, MORGAN, Mary, RAMAKRISHNAN, Venkat V
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 1170
container_issue 3
container_start_page 1164
container_title Journal of plastic, reconstructive & aesthetic surgery
container_volume 75
creator PANTELIDES, Nicholas M
JICA, Romulus CI
PATEL, Nakul G
MORGAN, Mary
RAMAKRISHNAN, Venkat V
description When the deep inferior epigastric perforator (DIEP) flap is unavailable, autologous reconstruction of a moderate-to-large breast presents a surgical challenge. We retrospectively review our experience of unilateral breast reconstruction using double transverse upper gracilis (TUG) flaps and highlight specific technical considerations. Thirty-four patients underwent double TUG flaps for unilateral breast reconstruction between 2012 and 2020. The average patient age was 50 years and the average body mass index (BMI) was 23.1 kg/m2. In all cases, the indication for surgery was breast cancer: 31 patients had immediate reconstruction, 11 had simultaneous axillary surgery and eight had primary contralateral symmetrising surgery. Of the 68 TUG flaps, 67 (98.5%) were successful. The mean operative time was 5 h 50 min (195–460 min) and the mean combined flap weight was 551 g (279–916 g). Eight patients returned to the operating theatre in the early post-operative period and five patients underwent secondary lipofilling to address contour deformities. Most commonly (n = 22), the flaps were oriented horizontally/obliquely, with one flap anastomosed medially to the internal mammary axis and the other anastomosed lateral to the subscapular system. The internal mammary artery perforators and serratus anterior artery provided the best vessel calibre match with the TUG vessels. Double TUG reconstruction is a safe and reliable option for unilateral breast reconstruction and is an important option when the DIEP flap is unavailable.
doi_str_mv 10.1016/j.bjps.2021.11.010
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2609459235</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S1748681521005544</els_id><sourcerecordid>2609459235</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c356t-257d6efae37dbd5e41c86fe4e3982593533a781b4aedf9e177db79dc9b5af4533</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kE1LxDAQhoMofqz-AQ-Sox5akyZpG_Aii18geNA9hzSZSpZuWzOt4L83y6pHTzMwz_vCPIScc5Zzxsvrdd6sR8wLVvCc85xxtkeOeV3VGVNC76e9knVW1lwdkRPENWNScKkOyZGQtS6ZVMfkddWHzk4QbUebCBYnGsENPU5xdlMYejpj6N-pH-amAzpF2-MnRAQ6jyNE-h6tC11Aevm2eriibWdHPCUHre0Qzn7mgqzu796Wj9nzy8PT8vY5c0KVU1aoypfQWhCVb7wCyV1dtiBB6LpQWighbFXzRlrwrQZeJazS3ulG2Vam64Jc7nrHOHzMgJPZBHTQdbaHYUZTlExLpYvUtCDFDnVxQIzQmjGGjY1fhjOzlWnWZivTbGUazk2SmUIXP_1zswH_F_m1l4CbHQDpy88A0aAL0DvwIUmcjB_Cf_3fs52G5w</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2609459235</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Unilateral breast reconstruction using double transverse upper gracilis (TUG) flaps</title><source>Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals Complete - AutoHoldings</source><creator>PANTELIDES, Nicholas M ; JICA, Romulus CI ; PATEL, Nakul G ; MORGAN, Mary ; RAMAKRISHNAN, Venkat V</creator><creatorcontrib>PANTELIDES, Nicholas M ; JICA, Romulus CI ; PATEL, Nakul G ; MORGAN, Mary ; RAMAKRISHNAN, Venkat V</creatorcontrib><description>When the deep inferior epigastric perforator (DIEP) flap is unavailable, autologous reconstruction of a moderate-to-large breast presents a surgical challenge. We retrospectively review our experience of unilateral breast reconstruction using double transverse upper gracilis (TUG) flaps and highlight specific technical considerations. Thirty-four patients underwent double TUG flaps for unilateral breast reconstruction between 2012 and 2020. The average patient age was 50 years and the average body mass index (BMI) was 23.1 kg/m2. In all cases, the indication for surgery was breast cancer: 31 patients had immediate reconstruction, 11 had simultaneous axillary surgery and eight had primary contralateral symmetrising surgery. Of the 68 TUG flaps, 67 (98.5%) were successful. The mean operative time was 5 h 50 min (195–460 min) and the mean combined flap weight was 551 g (279–916 g). Eight patients returned to the operating theatre in the early post-operative period and five patients underwent secondary lipofilling to address contour deformities. Most commonly (n = 22), the flaps were oriented horizontally/obliquely, with one flap anastomosed medially to the internal mammary axis and the other anastomosed lateral to the subscapular system. The internal mammary artery perforators and serratus anterior artery provided the best vessel calibre match with the TUG vessels. Double TUG reconstruction is a safe and reliable option for unilateral breast reconstruction and is an important option when the DIEP flap is unavailable.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1748-6815</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1878-0539</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.bjps.2021.11.010</identifier><identifier>PMID: 34896045</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Netherlands: Elsevier Ltd</publisher><subject>Breast reconstruction ; Double TUG ; TMG ; Transverse myocutaneous gracilis ; Transverse upper gracilis ; TUG</subject><ispartof>Journal of plastic, reconstructive &amp; aesthetic surgery, 2022-03, Vol.75 (3), p.1164-1170</ispartof><rights>2021 Elsevier Ltd</rights><rights>Copyright © 2021 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c356t-257d6efae37dbd5e41c86fe4e3982593533a781b4aedf9e177db79dc9b5af4533</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c356t-257d6efae37dbd5e41c86fe4e3982593533a781b4aedf9e177db79dc9b5af4533</cites><orcidid>0000-0002-7608-4074 ; 0000-0002-1289-5599 ; 0000-0003-0623-9912 ; 0000-0002-5134-946X</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.bjps.2021.11.010$$EHTML$$P50$$Gelsevier$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,778,782,3539,27913,27914,45984</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34896045$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>PANTELIDES, Nicholas M</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>JICA, Romulus CI</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>PATEL, Nakul G</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>MORGAN, Mary</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>RAMAKRISHNAN, Venkat V</creatorcontrib><title>Unilateral breast reconstruction using double transverse upper gracilis (TUG) flaps</title><title>Journal of plastic, reconstructive &amp; aesthetic surgery</title><addtitle>J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg</addtitle><description>When the deep inferior epigastric perforator (DIEP) flap is unavailable, autologous reconstruction of a moderate-to-large breast presents a surgical challenge. We retrospectively review our experience of unilateral breast reconstruction using double transverse upper gracilis (TUG) flaps and highlight specific technical considerations. Thirty-four patients underwent double TUG flaps for unilateral breast reconstruction between 2012 and 2020. The average patient age was 50 years and the average body mass index (BMI) was 23.1 kg/m2. In all cases, the indication for surgery was breast cancer: 31 patients had immediate reconstruction, 11 had simultaneous axillary surgery and eight had primary contralateral symmetrising surgery. Of the 68 TUG flaps, 67 (98.5%) were successful. The mean operative time was 5 h 50 min (195–460 min) and the mean combined flap weight was 551 g (279–916 g). Eight patients returned to the operating theatre in the early post-operative period and five patients underwent secondary lipofilling to address contour deformities. Most commonly (n = 22), the flaps were oriented horizontally/obliquely, with one flap anastomosed medially to the internal mammary axis and the other anastomosed lateral to the subscapular system. The internal mammary artery perforators and serratus anterior artery provided the best vessel calibre match with the TUG vessels. Double TUG reconstruction is a safe and reliable option for unilateral breast reconstruction and is an important option when the DIEP flap is unavailable.</description><subject>Breast reconstruction</subject><subject>Double TUG</subject><subject>TMG</subject><subject>Transverse myocutaneous gracilis</subject><subject>Transverse upper gracilis</subject><subject>TUG</subject><issn>1748-6815</issn><issn>1878-0539</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2022</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNp9kE1LxDAQhoMofqz-AQ-Sox5akyZpG_Aii18geNA9hzSZSpZuWzOt4L83y6pHTzMwz_vCPIScc5Zzxsvrdd6sR8wLVvCc85xxtkeOeV3VGVNC76e9knVW1lwdkRPENWNScKkOyZGQtS6ZVMfkddWHzk4QbUebCBYnGsENPU5xdlMYejpj6N-pH-amAzpF2-MnRAQ6jyNE-h6tC11Aevm2eriibWdHPCUHre0Qzn7mgqzu796Wj9nzy8PT8vY5c0KVU1aoypfQWhCVb7wCyV1dtiBB6LpQWighbFXzRlrwrQZeJazS3ulG2Vam64Jc7nrHOHzMgJPZBHTQdbaHYUZTlExLpYvUtCDFDnVxQIzQmjGGjY1fhjOzlWnWZivTbGUazk2SmUIXP_1zswH_F_m1l4CbHQDpy88A0aAL0DvwIUmcjB_Cf_3fs52G5w</recordid><startdate>20220301</startdate><enddate>20220301</enddate><creator>PANTELIDES, Nicholas M</creator><creator>JICA, Romulus CI</creator><creator>PATEL, Nakul G</creator><creator>MORGAN, Mary</creator><creator>RAMAKRISHNAN, Venkat V</creator><general>Elsevier Ltd</general><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7608-4074</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1289-5599</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0623-9912</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5134-946X</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20220301</creationdate><title>Unilateral breast reconstruction using double transverse upper gracilis (TUG) flaps</title><author>PANTELIDES, Nicholas M ; JICA, Romulus CI ; PATEL, Nakul G ; MORGAN, Mary ; RAMAKRISHNAN, Venkat V</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c356t-257d6efae37dbd5e41c86fe4e3982593533a781b4aedf9e177db79dc9b5af4533</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2022</creationdate><topic>Breast reconstruction</topic><topic>Double TUG</topic><topic>TMG</topic><topic>Transverse myocutaneous gracilis</topic><topic>Transverse upper gracilis</topic><topic>TUG</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>PANTELIDES, Nicholas M</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>JICA, Romulus CI</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>PATEL, Nakul G</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>MORGAN, Mary</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>RAMAKRISHNAN, Venkat V</creatorcontrib><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Journal of plastic, reconstructive &amp; aesthetic surgery</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>PANTELIDES, Nicholas M</au><au>JICA, Romulus CI</au><au>PATEL, Nakul G</au><au>MORGAN, Mary</au><au>RAMAKRISHNAN, Venkat V</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Unilateral breast reconstruction using double transverse upper gracilis (TUG) flaps</atitle><jtitle>Journal of plastic, reconstructive &amp; aesthetic surgery</jtitle><addtitle>J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg</addtitle><date>2022-03-01</date><risdate>2022</risdate><volume>75</volume><issue>3</issue><spage>1164</spage><epage>1170</epage><pages>1164-1170</pages><issn>1748-6815</issn><eissn>1878-0539</eissn><abstract>When the deep inferior epigastric perforator (DIEP) flap is unavailable, autologous reconstruction of a moderate-to-large breast presents a surgical challenge. We retrospectively review our experience of unilateral breast reconstruction using double transverse upper gracilis (TUG) flaps and highlight specific technical considerations. Thirty-four patients underwent double TUG flaps for unilateral breast reconstruction between 2012 and 2020. The average patient age was 50 years and the average body mass index (BMI) was 23.1 kg/m2. In all cases, the indication for surgery was breast cancer: 31 patients had immediate reconstruction, 11 had simultaneous axillary surgery and eight had primary contralateral symmetrising surgery. Of the 68 TUG flaps, 67 (98.5%) were successful. The mean operative time was 5 h 50 min (195–460 min) and the mean combined flap weight was 551 g (279–916 g). Eight patients returned to the operating theatre in the early post-operative period and five patients underwent secondary lipofilling to address contour deformities. Most commonly (n = 22), the flaps were oriented horizontally/obliquely, with one flap anastomosed medially to the internal mammary axis and the other anastomosed lateral to the subscapular system. The internal mammary artery perforators and serratus anterior artery provided the best vessel calibre match with the TUG vessels. Double TUG reconstruction is a safe and reliable option for unilateral breast reconstruction and is an important option when the DIEP flap is unavailable.</abstract><cop>Netherlands</cop><pub>Elsevier Ltd</pub><pmid>34896045</pmid><doi>10.1016/j.bjps.2021.11.010</doi><tpages>7</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7608-4074</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1289-5599</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0623-9912</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5134-946X</orcidid></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 1748-6815
ispartof Journal of plastic, reconstructive & aesthetic surgery, 2022-03, Vol.75 (3), p.1164-1170
issn 1748-6815
1878-0539
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2609459235
source Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals Complete - AutoHoldings
subjects Breast reconstruction
Double TUG
TMG
Transverse myocutaneous gracilis
Transverse upper gracilis
TUG
title Unilateral breast reconstruction using double transverse upper gracilis (TUG) flaps
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-15T08%3A43%3A06IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Unilateral%20breast%20reconstruction%20using%20double%20transverse%20upper%20gracilis%20(TUG)%20flaps&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20plastic,%20reconstructive%20&%20aesthetic%20surgery&rft.au=PANTELIDES,%20Nicholas%20M&rft.date=2022-03-01&rft.volume=75&rft.issue=3&rft.spage=1164&rft.epage=1170&rft.pages=1164-1170&rft.issn=1748-6815&rft.eissn=1878-0539&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.bjps.2021.11.010&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2609459235%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2609459235&rft_id=info:pmid/34896045&rft_els_id=S1748681521005544&rfr_iscdi=true