Action Enhances Predicted Touch
It is widely believed that predicted tactile action outcomes are perceptually attenuated. The present experiments determined whether predictive mechanisms necessarily generate attenuation or, instead, can enhance perception—as typically observed in sensory cognition domains outside of action. We man...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Psychological science 2022-01, Vol.33 (1), p.48-59 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 59 |
---|---|
container_issue | 1 |
container_start_page | 48 |
container_title | Psychological science |
container_volume | 33 |
creator | Thomas, Emily R. Yon, Daniel de Lange, Floris P. Press, Clare |
description | It is widely believed that predicted tactile action outcomes are perceptually attenuated. The present experiments determined whether predictive mechanisms necessarily generate attenuation or, instead, can enhance perception—as typically observed in sensory cognition domains outside of action. We manipulated probabilistic expectations in a paradigm often used to demonstrate tactile attenuation. Adult participants produced actions and subsequently rated the intensity of forces on a static finger. Experiment 1 confirmed previous findings that action outcomes are perceived less intensely than passive stimulation but demonstrated more intense perception when active finger stimulation was removed. Experiments 2 and 3 manipulated prediction explicitly and found that expected touch during action is perceived more intensely than unexpected touch. Computational modeling suggested that expectations increase the gain afforded to expected tactile signals. These findings challenge a central tenet of prominent motor control theories and demonstrate that sensorimotor predictions do not exhibit a qualitatively distinct influence on tactile perception. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1177/09567976211017505 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2608452273</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sage_id>10.1177_09567976211017505</sage_id><sourcerecordid>2608452273</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c477t-d785ef25c28aa29ff73cbd199e37c9b54c503daaa22832b291c0e2a49eb93e8b3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp1kD9PwzAQxS0EoqXwAVigEgtLin22Y3usqvJHqgRDmSPHudBUbVLsZODb46gFJBC33PB-793pEXLJ6IQxpe6okakyKgXGKFOSyiMyZCJViQFNj8mw15MeGJCzENY0juLpKRlwoZU2gg_J9dS1VVOP5_XK1g7D-MVjUbkWi_Gy6dzqnJyUdhPw4rBH5PV-vpw9Jovnh6fZdJE4oVSbFEpLLEE60NaCKUvFXV4wY5ArZ3IpnKS8sFEDzSEHwxxFsMJgbjjqnI_I7T5355v3DkObbavgcLOxNTZdyCClWkgAxSN68wtdN52v43eRAmZSAVRGiu0p55sQPJbZzldb6z8yRrO-vexPe9FzdUju8i0W346vuiIw2QPBvuHP2f8TPwG6znRf</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2621964205</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Action Enhances Predicted Touch</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>SAGE Complete</source><creator>Thomas, Emily R. ; Yon, Daniel ; de Lange, Floris P. ; Press, Clare</creator><creatorcontrib>Thomas, Emily R. ; Yon, Daniel ; de Lange, Floris P. ; Press, Clare</creatorcontrib><description>It is widely believed that predicted tactile action outcomes are perceptually attenuated. The present experiments determined whether predictive mechanisms necessarily generate attenuation or, instead, can enhance perception—as typically observed in sensory cognition domains outside of action. We manipulated probabilistic expectations in a paradigm often used to demonstrate tactile attenuation. Adult participants produced actions and subsequently rated the intensity of forces on a static finger. Experiment 1 confirmed previous findings that action outcomes are perceived less intensely than passive stimulation but demonstrated more intense perception when active finger stimulation was removed. Experiments 2 and 3 manipulated prediction explicitly and found that expected touch during action is perceived more intensely than unexpected touch. Computational modeling suggested that expectations increase the gain afforded to expected tactile signals. These findings challenge a central tenet of prominent motor control theories and demonstrate that sensorimotor predictions do not exhibit a qualitatively distinct influence on tactile perception.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0956-7976</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1467-9280</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1177/09567976211017505</identifier><identifier>PMID: 34878943</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Los Angeles, CA: SAGE Publications</publisher><subject>Action ; Adult ; Cognition ; Fingers ; Humans ; Perceptions ; Stimulation ; Touch - physiology ; Touch Perception - physiology</subject><ispartof>Psychological science, 2022-01, Vol.33 (1), p.48-59</ispartof><rights>The Author(s) 2021</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c477t-d785ef25c28aa29ff73cbd199e37c9b54c503daaa22832b291c0e2a49eb93e8b3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c477t-d785ef25c28aa29ff73cbd199e37c9b54c503daaa22832b291c0e2a49eb93e8b3</cites><orcidid>0000-0002-5511-3884 ; 0000-0002-4777-2249 ; 0000-0001-8875-6678</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://journals.sagepub.com/doi/pdf/10.1177/09567976211017505$$EPDF$$P50$$Gsage$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/09567976211017505$$EHTML$$P50$$Gsage$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,21798,27901,27902,43597,43598</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34878943$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Thomas, Emily R.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Yon, Daniel</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>de Lange, Floris P.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Press, Clare</creatorcontrib><title>Action Enhances Predicted Touch</title><title>Psychological science</title><addtitle>Psychol Sci</addtitle><description>It is widely believed that predicted tactile action outcomes are perceptually attenuated. The present experiments determined whether predictive mechanisms necessarily generate attenuation or, instead, can enhance perception—as typically observed in sensory cognition domains outside of action. We manipulated probabilistic expectations in a paradigm often used to demonstrate tactile attenuation. Adult participants produced actions and subsequently rated the intensity of forces on a static finger. Experiment 1 confirmed previous findings that action outcomes are perceived less intensely than passive stimulation but demonstrated more intense perception when active finger stimulation was removed. Experiments 2 and 3 manipulated prediction explicitly and found that expected touch during action is perceived more intensely than unexpected touch. Computational modeling suggested that expectations increase the gain afforded to expected tactile signals. These findings challenge a central tenet of prominent motor control theories and demonstrate that sensorimotor predictions do not exhibit a qualitatively distinct influence on tactile perception.</description><subject>Action</subject><subject>Adult</subject><subject>Cognition</subject><subject>Fingers</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Perceptions</subject><subject>Stimulation</subject><subject>Touch - physiology</subject><subject>Touch Perception - physiology</subject><issn>0956-7976</issn><issn>1467-9280</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2022</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNp1kD9PwzAQxS0EoqXwAVigEgtLin22Y3usqvJHqgRDmSPHudBUbVLsZODb46gFJBC33PB-793pEXLJ6IQxpe6okakyKgXGKFOSyiMyZCJViQFNj8mw15MeGJCzENY0juLpKRlwoZU2gg_J9dS1VVOP5_XK1g7D-MVjUbkWi_Gy6dzqnJyUdhPw4rBH5PV-vpw9Jovnh6fZdJE4oVSbFEpLLEE60NaCKUvFXV4wY5ArZ3IpnKS8sFEDzSEHwxxFsMJgbjjqnI_I7T5355v3DkObbavgcLOxNTZdyCClWkgAxSN68wtdN52v43eRAmZSAVRGiu0p55sQPJbZzldb6z8yRrO-vexPe9FzdUju8i0W346vuiIw2QPBvuHP2f8TPwG6znRf</recordid><startdate>20220101</startdate><enddate>20220101</enddate><creator>Thomas, Emily R.</creator><creator>Yon, Daniel</creator><creator>de Lange, Floris P.</creator><creator>Press, Clare</creator><general>SAGE Publications</general><general>SAGE PUBLICATIONS, INC</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>8BJ</scope><scope>FQK</scope><scope>JBE</scope><scope>7X8</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5511-3884</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4777-2249</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8875-6678</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20220101</creationdate><title>Action Enhances Predicted Touch</title><author>Thomas, Emily R. ; Yon, Daniel ; de Lange, Floris P. ; Press, Clare</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c477t-d785ef25c28aa29ff73cbd199e37c9b54c503daaa22832b291c0e2a49eb93e8b3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2022</creationdate><topic>Action</topic><topic>Adult</topic><topic>Cognition</topic><topic>Fingers</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Perceptions</topic><topic>Stimulation</topic><topic>Touch - physiology</topic><topic>Touch Perception - physiology</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Thomas, Emily R.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Yon, Daniel</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>de Lange, Floris P.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Press, Clare</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences (IBSS)</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Psychological science</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Thomas, Emily R.</au><au>Yon, Daniel</au><au>de Lange, Floris P.</au><au>Press, Clare</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Action Enhances Predicted Touch</atitle><jtitle>Psychological science</jtitle><addtitle>Psychol Sci</addtitle><date>2022-01-01</date><risdate>2022</risdate><volume>33</volume><issue>1</issue><spage>48</spage><epage>59</epage><pages>48-59</pages><issn>0956-7976</issn><eissn>1467-9280</eissn><abstract>It is widely believed that predicted tactile action outcomes are perceptually attenuated. The present experiments determined whether predictive mechanisms necessarily generate attenuation or, instead, can enhance perception—as typically observed in sensory cognition domains outside of action. We manipulated probabilistic expectations in a paradigm often used to demonstrate tactile attenuation. Adult participants produced actions and subsequently rated the intensity of forces on a static finger. Experiment 1 confirmed previous findings that action outcomes are perceived less intensely than passive stimulation but demonstrated more intense perception when active finger stimulation was removed. Experiments 2 and 3 manipulated prediction explicitly and found that expected touch during action is perceived more intensely than unexpected touch. Computational modeling suggested that expectations increase the gain afforded to expected tactile signals. These findings challenge a central tenet of prominent motor control theories and demonstrate that sensorimotor predictions do not exhibit a qualitatively distinct influence on tactile perception.</abstract><cop>Los Angeles, CA</cop><pub>SAGE Publications</pub><pmid>34878943</pmid><doi>10.1177/09567976211017505</doi><tpages>12</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5511-3884</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4777-2249</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8875-6678</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0956-7976 |
ispartof | Psychological science, 2022-01, Vol.33 (1), p.48-59 |
issn | 0956-7976 1467-9280 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2608452273 |
source | MEDLINE; SAGE Complete |
subjects | Action Adult Cognition Fingers Humans Perceptions Stimulation Touch - physiology Touch Perception - physiology |
title | Action Enhances Predicted Touch |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-11T09%3A11%3A03IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Action%20Enhances%20Predicted%20Touch&rft.jtitle=Psychological%20science&rft.au=Thomas,%20Emily%20R.&rft.date=2022-01-01&rft.volume=33&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=48&rft.epage=59&rft.pages=48-59&rft.issn=0956-7976&rft.eissn=1467-9280&rft_id=info:doi/10.1177/09567976211017505&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2608452273%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2621964205&rft_id=info:pmid/34878943&rft_sage_id=10.1177_09567976211017505&rfr_iscdi=true |