Action Enhances Predicted Touch

It is widely believed that predicted tactile action outcomes are perceptually attenuated. The present experiments determined whether predictive mechanisms necessarily generate attenuation or, instead, can enhance perception—as typically observed in sensory cognition domains outside of action. We man...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Psychological science 2022-01, Vol.33 (1), p.48-59
Hauptverfasser: Thomas, Emily R., Yon, Daniel, de Lange, Floris P., Press, Clare
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 59
container_issue 1
container_start_page 48
container_title Psychological science
container_volume 33
creator Thomas, Emily R.
Yon, Daniel
de Lange, Floris P.
Press, Clare
description It is widely believed that predicted tactile action outcomes are perceptually attenuated. The present experiments determined whether predictive mechanisms necessarily generate attenuation or, instead, can enhance perception—as typically observed in sensory cognition domains outside of action. We manipulated probabilistic expectations in a paradigm often used to demonstrate tactile attenuation. Adult participants produced actions and subsequently rated the intensity of forces on a static finger. Experiment 1 confirmed previous findings that action outcomes are perceived less intensely than passive stimulation but demonstrated more intense perception when active finger stimulation was removed. Experiments 2 and 3 manipulated prediction explicitly and found that expected touch during action is perceived more intensely than unexpected touch. Computational modeling suggested that expectations increase the gain afforded to expected tactile signals. These findings challenge a central tenet of prominent motor control theories and demonstrate that sensorimotor predictions do not exhibit a qualitatively distinct influence on tactile perception.
doi_str_mv 10.1177/09567976211017505
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2608452273</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sage_id>10.1177_09567976211017505</sage_id><sourcerecordid>2608452273</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c477t-d785ef25c28aa29ff73cbd199e37c9b54c503daaa22832b291c0e2a49eb93e8b3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp1kD9PwzAQxS0EoqXwAVigEgtLin22Y3usqvJHqgRDmSPHudBUbVLsZODb46gFJBC33PB-793pEXLJ6IQxpe6okakyKgXGKFOSyiMyZCJViQFNj8mw15MeGJCzENY0juLpKRlwoZU2gg_J9dS1VVOP5_XK1g7D-MVjUbkWi_Gy6dzqnJyUdhPw4rBH5PV-vpw9Jovnh6fZdJE4oVSbFEpLLEE60NaCKUvFXV4wY5ArZ3IpnKS8sFEDzSEHwxxFsMJgbjjqnI_I7T5355v3DkObbavgcLOxNTZdyCClWkgAxSN68wtdN52v43eRAmZSAVRGiu0p55sQPJbZzldb6z8yRrO-vexPe9FzdUju8i0W346vuiIw2QPBvuHP2f8TPwG6znRf</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2621964205</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Action Enhances Predicted Touch</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>SAGE Complete</source><creator>Thomas, Emily R. ; Yon, Daniel ; de Lange, Floris P. ; Press, Clare</creator><creatorcontrib>Thomas, Emily R. ; Yon, Daniel ; de Lange, Floris P. ; Press, Clare</creatorcontrib><description>It is widely believed that predicted tactile action outcomes are perceptually attenuated. The present experiments determined whether predictive mechanisms necessarily generate attenuation or, instead, can enhance perception—as typically observed in sensory cognition domains outside of action. We manipulated probabilistic expectations in a paradigm often used to demonstrate tactile attenuation. Adult participants produced actions and subsequently rated the intensity of forces on a static finger. Experiment 1 confirmed previous findings that action outcomes are perceived less intensely than passive stimulation but demonstrated more intense perception when active finger stimulation was removed. Experiments 2 and 3 manipulated prediction explicitly and found that expected touch during action is perceived more intensely than unexpected touch. Computational modeling suggested that expectations increase the gain afforded to expected tactile signals. These findings challenge a central tenet of prominent motor control theories and demonstrate that sensorimotor predictions do not exhibit a qualitatively distinct influence on tactile perception.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0956-7976</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1467-9280</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1177/09567976211017505</identifier><identifier>PMID: 34878943</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Los Angeles, CA: SAGE Publications</publisher><subject>Action ; Adult ; Cognition ; Fingers ; Humans ; Perceptions ; Stimulation ; Touch - physiology ; Touch Perception - physiology</subject><ispartof>Psychological science, 2022-01, Vol.33 (1), p.48-59</ispartof><rights>The Author(s) 2021</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c477t-d785ef25c28aa29ff73cbd199e37c9b54c503daaa22832b291c0e2a49eb93e8b3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c477t-d785ef25c28aa29ff73cbd199e37c9b54c503daaa22832b291c0e2a49eb93e8b3</cites><orcidid>0000-0002-5511-3884 ; 0000-0002-4777-2249 ; 0000-0001-8875-6678</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://journals.sagepub.com/doi/pdf/10.1177/09567976211017505$$EPDF$$P50$$Gsage$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/09567976211017505$$EHTML$$P50$$Gsage$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,21798,27901,27902,43597,43598</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34878943$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Thomas, Emily R.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Yon, Daniel</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>de Lange, Floris P.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Press, Clare</creatorcontrib><title>Action Enhances Predicted Touch</title><title>Psychological science</title><addtitle>Psychol Sci</addtitle><description>It is widely believed that predicted tactile action outcomes are perceptually attenuated. The present experiments determined whether predictive mechanisms necessarily generate attenuation or, instead, can enhance perception—as typically observed in sensory cognition domains outside of action. We manipulated probabilistic expectations in a paradigm often used to demonstrate tactile attenuation. Adult participants produced actions and subsequently rated the intensity of forces on a static finger. Experiment 1 confirmed previous findings that action outcomes are perceived less intensely than passive stimulation but demonstrated more intense perception when active finger stimulation was removed. Experiments 2 and 3 manipulated prediction explicitly and found that expected touch during action is perceived more intensely than unexpected touch. Computational modeling suggested that expectations increase the gain afforded to expected tactile signals. These findings challenge a central tenet of prominent motor control theories and demonstrate that sensorimotor predictions do not exhibit a qualitatively distinct influence on tactile perception.</description><subject>Action</subject><subject>Adult</subject><subject>Cognition</subject><subject>Fingers</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Perceptions</subject><subject>Stimulation</subject><subject>Touch - physiology</subject><subject>Touch Perception - physiology</subject><issn>0956-7976</issn><issn>1467-9280</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2022</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNp1kD9PwzAQxS0EoqXwAVigEgtLin22Y3usqvJHqgRDmSPHudBUbVLsZODb46gFJBC33PB-793pEXLJ6IQxpe6okakyKgXGKFOSyiMyZCJViQFNj8mw15MeGJCzENY0juLpKRlwoZU2gg_J9dS1VVOP5_XK1g7D-MVjUbkWi_Gy6dzqnJyUdhPw4rBH5PV-vpw9Jovnh6fZdJE4oVSbFEpLLEE60NaCKUvFXV4wY5ArZ3IpnKS8sFEDzSEHwxxFsMJgbjjqnI_I7T5355v3DkObbavgcLOxNTZdyCClWkgAxSN68wtdN52v43eRAmZSAVRGiu0p55sQPJbZzldb6z8yRrO-vexPe9FzdUju8i0W346vuiIw2QPBvuHP2f8TPwG6znRf</recordid><startdate>20220101</startdate><enddate>20220101</enddate><creator>Thomas, Emily R.</creator><creator>Yon, Daniel</creator><creator>de Lange, Floris P.</creator><creator>Press, Clare</creator><general>SAGE Publications</general><general>SAGE PUBLICATIONS, INC</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>8BJ</scope><scope>FQK</scope><scope>JBE</scope><scope>7X8</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5511-3884</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4777-2249</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8875-6678</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20220101</creationdate><title>Action Enhances Predicted Touch</title><author>Thomas, Emily R. ; Yon, Daniel ; de Lange, Floris P. ; Press, Clare</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c477t-d785ef25c28aa29ff73cbd199e37c9b54c503daaa22832b291c0e2a49eb93e8b3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2022</creationdate><topic>Action</topic><topic>Adult</topic><topic>Cognition</topic><topic>Fingers</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Perceptions</topic><topic>Stimulation</topic><topic>Touch - physiology</topic><topic>Touch Perception - physiology</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Thomas, Emily R.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Yon, Daniel</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>de Lange, Floris P.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Press, Clare</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences (IBSS)</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Psychological science</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Thomas, Emily R.</au><au>Yon, Daniel</au><au>de Lange, Floris P.</au><au>Press, Clare</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Action Enhances Predicted Touch</atitle><jtitle>Psychological science</jtitle><addtitle>Psychol Sci</addtitle><date>2022-01-01</date><risdate>2022</risdate><volume>33</volume><issue>1</issue><spage>48</spage><epage>59</epage><pages>48-59</pages><issn>0956-7976</issn><eissn>1467-9280</eissn><abstract>It is widely believed that predicted tactile action outcomes are perceptually attenuated. The present experiments determined whether predictive mechanisms necessarily generate attenuation or, instead, can enhance perception—as typically observed in sensory cognition domains outside of action. We manipulated probabilistic expectations in a paradigm often used to demonstrate tactile attenuation. Adult participants produced actions and subsequently rated the intensity of forces on a static finger. Experiment 1 confirmed previous findings that action outcomes are perceived less intensely than passive stimulation but demonstrated more intense perception when active finger stimulation was removed. Experiments 2 and 3 manipulated prediction explicitly and found that expected touch during action is perceived more intensely than unexpected touch. Computational modeling suggested that expectations increase the gain afforded to expected tactile signals. These findings challenge a central tenet of prominent motor control theories and demonstrate that sensorimotor predictions do not exhibit a qualitatively distinct influence on tactile perception.</abstract><cop>Los Angeles, CA</cop><pub>SAGE Publications</pub><pmid>34878943</pmid><doi>10.1177/09567976211017505</doi><tpages>12</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5511-3884</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4777-2249</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8875-6678</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0956-7976
ispartof Psychological science, 2022-01, Vol.33 (1), p.48-59
issn 0956-7976
1467-9280
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2608452273
source MEDLINE; SAGE Complete
subjects Action
Adult
Cognition
Fingers
Humans
Perceptions
Stimulation
Touch - physiology
Touch Perception - physiology
title Action Enhances Predicted Touch
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-11T09%3A11%3A03IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Action%20Enhances%20Predicted%20Touch&rft.jtitle=Psychological%20science&rft.au=Thomas,%20Emily%20R.&rft.date=2022-01-01&rft.volume=33&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=48&rft.epage=59&rft.pages=48-59&rft.issn=0956-7976&rft.eissn=1467-9280&rft_id=info:doi/10.1177/09567976211017505&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2608452273%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2621964205&rft_id=info:pmid/34878943&rft_sage_id=10.1177_09567976211017505&rfr_iscdi=true