Removal of micropollutants from municipal wastewater by membrane bioreactors: Conventional membrane versus dynamic membrane
In this study, fate of micropollutants was investigated in a membrane bioreactor (MBR) having dynamic membrane (DM) and ultrafiltration (UF) membrane for the treatment of raw municipal wastewater. Removal efficiencies of different micropollutants including sulfamethoxazole, ciprofloxacin, trimethopr...
Gespeichert in:
| Veröffentlicht in: | Journal of environmental management 2022-02, Vol.303, p.114233-114233, Article 114233 |
|---|---|
| Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , , |
| Format: | Artikel |
| Sprache: | eng |
| Schlagworte: | |
| Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
| Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
| container_end_page | 114233 |
|---|---|
| container_issue | |
| container_start_page | 114233 |
| container_title | Journal of environmental management |
| container_volume | 303 |
| creator | Isik, Onur Erbil, Melek Cagla Abdelrahman, Amr Mustafa Ersahin, Mustafa Evren Koyuncu, Ismail Ozgun, Hale Demir, Ibrahim |
| description | In this study, fate of micropollutants was investigated in a membrane bioreactor (MBR) having dynamic membrane (DM) and ultrafiltration (UF) membrane for the treatment of raw municipal wastewater. Removal efficiencies of different micropollutants including sulfamethoxazole, ciprofloxacin, trimethoprim, caffeine and acetaminophen were assessed. A commercial hollow fiber UF membrane was used in parallel with a DM that was formed on a low-cost hollow fiber support material, made of polyester. MBR was operated at a flux of 10 L/m2·h. High total suspended solids (>99%) and chemical oxygen demand (>91%) removal efficiencies were achieved with each membrane. Besides, high removal efficiencies of micropollutants (>68.3->99.7%) were achieved. Morphological analyses were conducted for each membrane in order to get insight to the cake (dynamic) layer that was accumulated on the membrane. DM technology provides an effective alternative to the conventional membrane systems for micropollutant removal from municipal wastewater.
•Hollow fiber dynamic membrane (DM) and a commercial ultrafiltration membrane (UF) were compared.•The two membranes were operated at a flux of 10 L/m2·h in the same reactor.•Similar micropollutant removal efficiencies were obtained with both membranes.•Higher transmembrane pressure was observed for DM, because of dynamic layer formation. |
| doi_str_mv | 10.1016/j.jenvman.2021.114233 |
| format | Article |
| fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2608132070</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S0301479721022957</els_id><sourcerecordid>2608132070</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c365t-c3d266475ad50b4ab52f56a76668f8c3ba16bf2042340ec0eb1cb57142e937423</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFkF1rFDEUhoMo7bb2Jyi59GbXfEySWW9EltYKBUH0OiSZM5BlkqxJZsrinzdl1731JoHD8-Y9eRB6R8mGEio_7jd7iEswccMIoxtKO8b5K7SiZCvWveTkNVoRTui6U1t1jW5K2RNCOKPqCl3zrldCSLlCf35ASIuZcBpx8C6nQ5qmuZpYCx5zCjjM0Tt_aMSzKRWeTYWM7REHCDabCNj6lMG4mnL5hHcpLhCrT7EFLsgCucwFD8doWsdl_ha9Gc1U4O5836JfD_c_d4_rp-9fv-2-PK0dl6K2c2BSdkqYQRDbGSvYKKRRUsp-7B23hko7MtIEdAQcAUudFaoJgS1XbXqLPpzePeT0e4ZSdfDFwTS1HdJcNJOkp5wRRRoqTmgzUUqGUR-yDyYfNSX6xbve67N3_eJdn7y33PtzxWwDDJfUP9EN-HwCoH108ZB1cR6ig8FncFUPyf-n4i8a8Zlj</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2608132070</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Removal of micropollutants from municipal wastewater by membrane bioreactors: Conventional membrane versus dynamic membrane</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals</source><creator>Isik, Onur ; Erbil, Melek Cagla ; Abdelrahman, Amr Mustafa ; Ersahin, Mustafa Evren ; Koyuncu, Ismail ; Ozgun, Hale ; Demir, Ibrahim</creator><creatorcontrib>Isik, Onur ; Erbil, Melek Cagla ; Abdelrahman, Amr Mustafa ; Ersahin, Mustafa Evren ; Koyuncu, Ismail ; Ozgun, Hale ; Demir, Ibrahim</creatorcontrib><description>In this study, fate of micropollutants was investigated in a membrane bioreactor (MBR) having dynamic membrane (DM) and ultrafiltration (UF) membrane for the treatment of raw municipal wastewater. Removal efficiencies of different micropollutants including sulfamethoxazole, ciprofloxacin, trimethoprim, caffeine and acetaminophen were assessed. A commercial hollow fiber UF membrane was used in parallel with a DM that was formed on a low-cost hollow fiber support material, made of polyester. MBR was operated at a flux of 10 L/m2·h. High total suspended solids (>99%) and chemical oxygen demand (>91%) removal efficiencies were achieved with each membrane. Besides, high removal efficiencies of micropollutants (>68.3->99.7%) were achieved. Morphological analyses were conducted for each membrane in order to get insight to the cake (dynamic) layer that was accumulated on the membrane. DM technology provides an effective alternative to the conventional membrane systems for micropollutant removal from municipal wastewater.
•Hollow fiber dynamic membrane (DM) and a commercial ultrafiltration membrane (UF) were compared.•The two membranes were operated at a flux of 10 L/m2·h in the same reactor.•Similar micropollutant removal efficiencies were obtained with both membranes.•Higher transmembrane pressure was observed for DM, because of dynamic layer formation.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0301-4797</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1095-8630</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.jenvman.2021.114233</identifier><identifier>PMID: 34875566</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>England: Elsevier Ltd</publisher><subject>Bioreactors ; Dynamic membrane ; Hollow fiber ; Membrane bioreactor ; Membranes, Artificial ; Micropollutant ; Municipal wastewater ; Ultrafiltration ; Waste Disposal, Fluid ; Waste Water ; Water Purification</subject><ispartof>Journal of environmental management, 2022-02, Vol.303, p.114233-114233, Article 114233</ispartof><rights>2021 Elsevier Ltd</rights><rights>Copyright © 2021 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c365t-c3d266475ad50b4ab52f56a76668f8c3ba16bf2042340ec0eb1cb57142e937423</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c365t-c3d266475ad50b4ab52f56a76668f8c3ba16bf2042340ec0eb1cb57142e937423</cites><orcidid>0000-0001-5595-9807 ; 0000-0002-4796-1250</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0301479721022957$$EHTML$$P50$$Gelsevier$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,3537,27901,27902,65306</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34875566$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Isik, Onur</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Erbil, Melek Cagla</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Abdelrahman, Amr Mustafa</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ersahin, Mustafa Evren</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Koyuncu, Ismail</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ozgun, Hale</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Demir, Ibrahim</creatorcontrib><title>Removal of micropollutants from municipal wastewater by membrane bioreactors: Conventional membrane versus dynamic membrane</title><title>Journal of environmental management</title><addtitle>J Environ Manage</addtitle><description>In this study, fate of micropollutants was investigated in a membrane bioreactor (MBR) having dynamic membrane (DM) and ultrafiltration (UF) membrane for the treatment of raw municipal wastewater. Removal efficiencies of different micropollutants including sulfamethoxazole, ciprofloxacin, trimethoprim, caffeine and acetaminophen were assessed. A commercial hollow fiber UF membrane was used in parallel with a DM that was formed on a low-cost hollow fiber support material, made of polyester. MBR was operated at a flux of 10 L/m2·h. High total suspended solids (>99%) and chemical oxygen demand (>91%) removal efficiencies were achieved with each membrane. Besides, high removal efficiencies of micropollutants (>68.3->99.7%) were achieved. Morphological analyses were conducted for each membrane in order to get insight to the cake (dynamic) layer that was accumulated on the membrane. DM technology provides an effective alternative to the conventional membrane systems for micropollutant removal from municipal wastewater.
•Hollow fiber dynamic membrane (DM) and a commercial ultrafiltration membrane (UF) were compared.•The two membranes were operated at a flux of 10 L/m2·h in the same reactor.•Similar micropollutant removal efficiencies were obtained with both membranes.•Higher transmembrane pressure was observed for DM, because of dynamic layer formation.</description><subject>Bioreactors</subject><subject>Dynamic membrane</subject><subject>Hollow fiber</subject><subject>Membrane bioreactor</subject><subject>Membranes, Artificial</subject><subject>Micropollutant</subject><subject>Municipal wastewater</subject><subject>Ultrafiltration</subject><subject>Waste Disposal, Fluid</subject><subject>Waste Water</subject><subject>Water Purification</subject><issn>0301-4797</issn><issn>1095-8630</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2022</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNqFkF1rFDEUhoMo7bb2Jyi59GbXfEySWW9EltYKBUH0OiSZM5BlkqxJZsrinzdl1731JoHD8-Y9eRB6R8mGEio_7jd7iEswccMIoxtKO8b5K7SiZCvWveTkNVoRTui6U1t1jW5K2RNCOKPqCl3zrldCSLlCf35ASIuZcBpx8C6nQ5qmuZpYCx5zCjjM0Tt_aMSzKRWeTYWM7REHCDabCNj6lMG4mnL5hHcpLhCrT7EFLsgCucwFD8doWsdl_ha9Gc1U4O5836JfD_c_d4_rp-9fv-2-PK0dl6K2c2BSdkqYQRDbGSvYKKRRUsp-7B23hko7MtIEdAQcAUudFaoJgS1XbXqLPpzePeT0e4ZSdfDFwTS1HdJcNJOkp5wRRRoqTmgzUUqGUR-yDyYfNSX6xbve67N3_eJdn7y33PtzxWwDDJfUP9EN-HwCoH108ZB1cR6ig8FncFUPyf-n4i8a8Zlj</recordid><startdate>20220201</startdate><enddate>20220201</enddate><creator>Isik, Onur</creator><creator>Erbil, Melek Cagla</creator><creator>Abdelrahman, Amr Mustafa</creator><creator>Ersahin, Mustafa Evren</creator><creator>Koyuncu, Ismail</creator><creator>Ozgun, Hale</creator><creator>Demir, Ibrahim</creator><general>Elsevier Ltd</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5595-9807</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4796-1250</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20220201</creationdate><title>Removal of micropollutants from municipal wastewater by membrane bioreactors: Conventional membrane versus dynamic membrane</title><author>Isik, Onur ; Erbil, Melek Cagla ; Abdelrahman, Amr Mustafa ; Ersahin, Mustafa Evren ; Koyuncu, Ismail ; Ozgun, Hale ; Demir, Ibrahim</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c365t-c3d266475ad50b4ab52f56a76668f8c3ba16bf2042340ec0eb1cb57142e937423</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2022</creationdate><topic>Bioreactors</topic><topic>Dynamic membrane</topic><topic>Hollow fiber</topic><topic>Membrane bioreactor</topic><topic>Membranes, Artificial</topic><topic>Micropollutant</topic><topic>Municipal wastewater</topic><topic>Ultrafiltration</topic><topic>Waste Disposal, Fluid</topic><topic>Waste Water</topic><topic>Water Purification</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Isik, Onur</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Erbil, Melek Cagla</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Abdelrahman, Amr Mustafa</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ersahin, Mustafa Evren</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Koyuncu, Ismail</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ozgun, Hale</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Demir, Ibrahim</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Journal of environmental management</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Isik, Onur</au><au>Erbil, Melek Cagla</au><au>Abdelrahman, Amr Mustafa</au><au>Ersahin, Mustafa Evren</au><au>Koyuncu, Ismail</au><au>Ozgun, Hale</au><au>Demir, Ibrahim</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Removal of micropollutants from municipal wastewater by membrane bioreactors: Conventional membrane versus dynamic membrane</atitle><jtitle>Journal of environmental management</jtitle><addtitle>J Environ Manage</addtitle><date>2022-02-01</date><risdate>2022</risdate><volume>303</volume><spage>114233</spage><epage>114233</epage><pages>114233-114233</pages><artnum>114233</artnum><issn>0301-4797</issn><eissn>1095-8630</eissn><abstract>In this study, fate of micropollutants was investigated in a membrane bioreactor (MBR) having dynamic membrane (DM) and ultrafiltration (UF) membrane for the treatment of raw municipal wastewater. Removal efficiencies of different micropollutants including sulfamethoxazole, ciprofloxacin, trimethoprim, caffeine and acetaminophen were assessed. A commercial hollow fiber UF membrane was used in parallel with a DM that was formed on a low-cost hollow fiber support material, made of polyester. MBR was operated at a flux of 10 L/m2·h. High total suspended solids (>99%) and chemical oxygen demand (>91%) removal efficiencies were achieved with each membrane. Besides, high removal efficiencies of micropollutants (>68.3->99.7%) were achieved. Morphological analyses were conducted for each membrane in order to get insight to the cake (dynamic) layer that was accumulated on the membrane. DM technology provides an effective alternative to the conventional membrane systems for micropollutant removal from municipal wastewater.
•Hollow fiber dynamic membrane (DM) and a commercial ultrafiltration membrane (UF) were compared.•The two membranes were operated at a flux of 10 L/m2·h in the same reactor.•Similar micropollutant removal efficiencies were obtained with both membranes.•Higher transmembrane pressure was observed for DM, because of dynamic layer formation.</abstract><cop>England</cop><pub>Elsevier Ltd</pub><pmid>34875566</pmid><doi>10.1016/j.jenvman.2021.114233</doi><tpages>1</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5595-9807</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4796-1250</orcidid></addata></record> |
| fulltext | fulltext |
| identifier | ISSN: 0301-4797 |
| ispartof | Journal of environmental management, 2022-02, Vol.303, p.114233-114233, Article 114233 |
| issn | 0301-4797 1095-8630 |
| language | eng |
| recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2608132070 |
| source | MEDLINE; Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals |
| subjects | Bioreactors Dynamic membrane Hollow fiber Membrane bioreactor Membranes, Artificial Micropollutant Municipal wastewater Ultrafiltration Waste Disposal, Fluid Waste Water Water Purification |
| title | Removal of micropollutants from municipal wastewater by membrane bioreactors: Conventional membrane versus dynamic membrane |
| url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-11T13%3A11%3A52IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Removal%20of%20micropollutants%20from%20municipal%20wastewater%20by%20membrane%20bioreactors:%20Conventional%20membrane%20versus%20dynamic%20membrane&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20environmental%20management&rft.au=Isik,%20Onur&rft.date=2022-02-01&rft.volume=303&rft.spage=114233&rft.epage=114233&rft.pages=114233-114233&rft.artnum=114233&rft.issn=0301-4797&rft.eissn=1095-8630&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.jenvman.2021.114233&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2608132070%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2608132070&rft_id=info:pmid/34875566&rft_els_id=S0301479721022957&rfr_iscdi=true |