Monitoring Bevacizumab‐Induced Tumor Vascular Normalization by Intravoxel Incoherent Motion Diffusion‐Weighted MRI

Background Accurate monitoring of tumor blood vessel normalization progression is beneficial to accurate treatment of patients. At present, there is a lack of safe and noninvasive monitoring methods. Purpose To serial monitor the vascular normalization time window of tumor antiangiogenesis treatment...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Journal of magnetic resonance imaging 2022-08, Vol.56 (2), p.427-439
Hauptverfasser: Li, Bo, Xu, Dan, Zhou, Jie, Wang, Shou‐Chao, Cai, Yu‐Xiang, Li, Huan, Xu, Hai‐Bo
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 439
container_issue 2
container_start_page 427
container_title Journal of magnetic resonance imaging
container_volume 56
creator Li, Bo
Xu, Dan
Zhou, Jie
Wang, Shou‐Chao
Cai, Yu‐Xiang
Li, Huan
Xu, Hai‐Bo
description Background Accurate monitoring of tumor blood vessel normalization progression is beneficial to accurate treatment of patients. At present, there is a lack of safe and noninvasive monitoring methods. Purpose To serial monitor the vascular normalization time window of tumor antiangiogenesis treatment through intravoxel incoherent motion diffusion‐weighted imaging (IVIM‐DWI) and histopathological methods. Study Type Exploratory animal study. Population Sixty rat C6 glioma models were randomly and equally divided into the control groups (N = 30) and bevacizumab treatment groups (N = 30). Twenty‐five for magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) and five for electron microscope testing in each group. Field Strength/Sequence T1‐weighted imaging (T1WI), T2WI with a fast spin echo sequence and IVIM‐DWI with a spin‐echo echo‐planar imaging sequence at 3 T. Assessment IVIM‐DWI quantitative parameters (f, D, D*, and fD*) were obtained on days 0, 2, 4, 6, and 8 after bevacizumab treatment. After MRI, the microvessel density (MVD), pericyte coverage, and hypoxia‐inducible factor‐1α (HIF‐1α) were assessed. Electron microscope observation was performed at each time point. Statistical Tests One‐way analysis of variance and Student's t‐tests were used to compare differences within and between groups. Spearman's correlation coefficient (r) assess the correlation between IVIM and pathological parameters. The intragroup correlation coefficient was determined to assess the repeatability of each IVIM parameter. Results The IVIM‐DWI perfusion parameters (f and fD*) of the treated group were higher than the control group on days 2 and 4. Compared to the control group, MVD decreased on days 2 and pericyte coverage increased on days 4 in the treatment group. Electron microscopy showed that the tight junctions of the treatment group were prolonged on days 2–4. In the control group, f had the highest correlation with MVD (r = 0.689). In the treated group, f had a good correlation with pericyte coverage (r = 0.557), HIF‐1α had a moderately positive correlation with f (r = 0.480) and fD*(r = 0.447). Data Conclusion The vascular normalization time window of bevacizumab treatment of glioma was days 2–4 after antiangiogenesis treatment, which could be monitored noninvasively by IVIM‐DWI. Evidence Level 2 Technical Efficacy Stage 3
doi_str_mv 10.1002/jmri.28012
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2607598079</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2607598079</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3572-fc9eab8160c4173801ddaf90505f5ccd61ca113ef980f6704567464700394e043</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kctOxCAUhonReBnd-ACmiRtjUj20Bdqld8fMaGK8LBuGgjJpi0IZHVc-gs_ok4iOunDhij_h4wvn_AitY9jBAMnuuLF6J8kBJ3NoGZMkiROS0_mQgaQxzoEtoRXnxgBQFBlZREtplrOUUbqMJkPT6s5Y3d5F-3LChX7xDR-9v77128oLWUVXvjE2uuFO-Jrb6NzYhtf6hXfatNFoGvXbzvKJeZZ1iMLcSyvbLhqar_tDrZR3IQXhrdR3910wDi_7q2hB8drJte-zh66Pj64OTuPBxUn_YG8Qi5SwJFaikHyUYwoiwywNI1YVVwUQIIoIUVEsOMapVEUOijLICGUZzRhAWmQSsrSHtmbeB2sevXRd2WgnZF3zVhrvyoQCI-ExKwK6-QcdG2_b8LtA5YyygOJAbc8oYY1zVqryweqG22mJofxso_xso_xqI8Ab30o_amT1i_6sPwB4BjzpWk7_UZVnYWkz6QcCspcs</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2687676071</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Monitoring Bevacizumab‐Induced Tumor Vascular Normalization by Intravoxel Incoherent Motion Diffusion‐Weighted MRI</title><source>Access via Wiley Online Library</source><creator>Li, Bo ; Xu, Dan ; Zhou, Jie ; Wang, Shou‐Chao ; Cai, Yu‐Xiang ; Li, Huan ; Xu, Hai‐Bo</creator><creatorcontrib>Li, Bo ; Xu, Dan ; Zhou, Jie ; Wang, Shou‐Chao ; Cai, Yu‐Xiang ; Li, Huan ; Xu, Hai‐Bo</creatorcontrib><description>Background Accurate monitoring of tumor blood vessel normalization progression is beneficial to accurate treatment of patients. At present, there is a lack of safe and noninvasive monitoring methods. Purpose To serial monitor the vascular normalization time window of tumor antiangiogenesis treatment through intravoxel incoherent motion diffusion‐weighted imaging (IVIM‐DWI) and histopathological methods. Study Type Exploratory animal study. Population Sixty rat C6 glioma models were randomly and equally divided into the control groups (N = 30) and bevacizumab treatment groups (N = 30). Twenty‐five for magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) and five for electron microscope testing in each group. Field Strength/Sequence T1‐weighted imaging (T1WI), T2WI with a fast spin echo sequence and IVIM‐DWI with a spin‐echo echo‐planar imaging sequence at 3 T. Assessment IVIM‐DWI quantitative parameters (f, D, D*, and fD*) were obtained on days 0, 2, 4, 6, and 8 after bevacizumab treatment. After MRI, the microvessel density (MVD), pericyte coverage, and hypoxia‐inducible factor‐1α (HIF‐1α) were assessed. Electron microscope observation was performed at each time point. Statistical Tests One‐way analysis of variance and Student's t‐tests were used to compare differences within and between groups. Spearman's correlation coefficient (r) assess the correlation between IVIM and pathological parameters. The intragroup correlation coefficient was determined to assess the repeatability of each IVIM parameter. Results The IVIM‐DWI perfusion parameters (f and fD*) of the treated group were higher than the control group on days 2 and 4. Compared to the control group, MVD decreased on days 2 and pericyte coverage increased on days 4 in the treatment group. Electron microscopy showed that the tight junctions of the treatment group were prolonged on days 2–4. In the control group, f had the highest correlation with MVD (r = 0.689). In the treated group, f had a good correlation with pericyte coverage (r = 0.557), HIF‐1α had a moderately positive correlation with f (r = 0.480) and fD*(r = 0.447). Data Conclusion The vascular normalization time window of bevacizumab treatment of glioma was days 2–4 after antiangiogenesis treatment, which could be monitored noninvasively by IVIM‐DWI. Evidence Level 2 Technical Efficacy Stage 3</description><identifier>ISSN: 1053-1807</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1522-2586</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1002/jmri.28012</identifier><identifier>PMID: 34873766</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Hoboken, USA: John Wiley &amp; Sons, Inc</publisher><subject>angiogenesis ; Animal models ; Bevacizumab ; Blood vessels ; Brain tumors ; Correlation coefficient ; Correlation coefficients ; diffusion‐weighted imaging ; Electron microscopes ; Electron microscopy ; Field strength ; Glioma ; Hypoxia ; intravoxel incoherent motion ; Magnetic resonance imaging ; Medical imaging ; microvessel density ; Monitoring ; Monitoring methods ; Monoclonal antibodies ; Parameters ; Perfusion ; pericyte coverage ; Population studies ; Statistical analysis ; Statistical tests ; Targeted cancer therapy ; Telemedicine ; Tight junctions ; Tumors ; Variance analysis ; Windows (intervals)</subject><ispartof>Journal of magnetic resonance imaging, 2022-08, Vol.56 (2), p.427-439</ispartof><rights>2021 International Society for Magnetic Resonance in Medicine.</rights><rights>2022 International Society for Magnetic Resonance in Medicine</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3572-fc9eab8160c4173801ddaf90505f5ccd61ca113ef980f6704567464700394e043</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3572-fc9eab8160c4173801ddaf90505f5ccd61ca113ef980f6704567464700394e043</cites><orcidid>0000-0002-8451-8979</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1002%2Fjmri.28012$$EPDF$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1002%2Fjmri.28012$$EHTML$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>315,781,785,1418,27929,27930,45579,45580</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34873766$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Li, Bo</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Xu, Dan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Zhou, Jie</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wang, Shou‐Chao</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Cai, Yu‐Xiang</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Li, Huan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Xu, Hai‐Bo</creatorcontrib><title>Monitoring Bevacizumab‐Induced Tumor Vascular Normalization by Intravoxel Incoherent Motion Diffusion‐Weighted MRI</title><title>Journal of magnetic resonance imaging</title><addtitle>J Magn Reson Imaging</addtitle><description>Background Accurate monitoring of tumor blood vessel normalization progression is beneficial to accurate treatment of patients. At present, there is a lack of safe and noninvasive monitoring methods. Purpose To serial monitor the vascular normalization time window of tumor antiangiogenesis treatment through intravoxel incoherent motion diffusion‐weighted imaging (IVIM‐DWI) and histopathological methods. Study Type Exploratory animal study. Population Sixty rat C6 glioma models were randomly and equally divided into the control groups (N = 30) and bevacizumab treatment groups (N = 30). Twenty‐five for magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) and five for electron microscope testing in each group. Field Strength/Sequence T1‐weighted imaging (T1WI), T2WI with a fast spin echo sequence and IVIM‐DWI with a spin‐echo echo‐planar imaging sequence at 3 T. Assessment IVIM‐DWI quantitative parameters (f, D, D*, and fD*) were obtained on days 0, 2, 4, 6, and 8 after bevacizumab treatment. After MRI, the microvessel density (MVD), pericyte coverage, and hypoxia‐inducible factor‐1α (HIF‐1α) were assessed. Electron microscope observation was performed at each time point. Statistical Tests One‐way analysis of variance and Student's t‐tests were used to compare differences within and between groups. Spearman's correlation coefficient (r) assess the correlation between IVIM and pathological parameters. The intragroup correlation coefficient was determined to assess the repeatability of each IVIM parameter. Results The IVIM‐DWI perfusion parameters (f and fD*) of the treated group were higher than the control group on days 2 and 4. Compared to the control group, MVD decreased on days 2 and pericyte coverage increased on days 4 in the treatment group. Electron microscopy showed that the tight junctions of the treatment group were prolonged on days 2–4. In the control group, f had the highest correlation with MVD (r = 0.689). In the treated group, f had a good correlation with pericyte coverage (r = 0.557), HIF‐1α had a moderately positive correlation with f (r = 0.480) and fD*(r = 0.447). Data Conclusion The vascular normalization time window of bevacizumab treatment of glioma was days 2–4 after antiangiogenesis treatment, which could be monitored noninvasively by IVIM‐DWI. Evidence Level 2 Technical Efficacy Stage 3</description><subject>angiogenesis</subject><subject>Animal models</subject><subject>Bevacizumab</subject><subject>Blood vessels</subject><subject>Brain tumors</subject><subject>Correlation coefficient</subject><subject>Correlation coefficients</subject><subject>diffusion‐weighted imaging</subject><subject>Electron microscopes</subject><subject>Electron microscopy</subject><subject>Field strength</subject><subject>Glioma</subject><subject>Hypoxia</subject><subject>intravoxel incoherent motion</subject><subject>Magnetic resonance imaging</subject><subject>Medical imaging</subject><subject>microvessel density</subject><subject>Monitoring</subject><subject>Monitoring methods</subject><subject>Monoclonal antibodies</subject><subject>Parameters</subject><subject>Perfusion</subject><subject>pericyte coverage</subject><subject>Population studies</subject><subject>Statistical analysis</subject><subject>Statistical tests</subject><subject>Targeted cancer therapy</subject><subject>Telemedicine</subject><subject>Tight junctions</subject><subject>Tumors</subject><subject>Variance analysis</subject><subject>Windows (intervals)</subject><issn>1053-1807</issn><issn>1522-2586</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2022</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNp9kctOxCAUhonReBnd-ACmiRtjUj20Bdqld8fMaGK8LBuGgjJpi0IZHVc-gs_ok4iOunDhij_h4wvn_AitY9jBAMnuuLF6J8kBJ3NoGZMkiROS0_mQgaQxzoEtoRXnxgBQFBlZREtplrOUUbqMJkPT6s5Y3d5F-3LChX7xDR-9v77128oLWUVXvjE2uuFO-Jrb6NzYhtf6hXfatNFoGvXbzvKJeZZ1iMLcSyvbLhqar_tDrZR3IQXhrdR3910wDi_7q2hB8drJte-zh66Pj64OTuPBxUn_YG8Qi5SwJFaikHyUYwoiwywNI1YVVwUQIIoIUVEsOMapVEUOijLICGUZzRhAWmQSsrSHtmbeB2sevXRd2WgnZF3zVhrvyoQCI-ExKwK6-QcdG2_b8LtA5YyygOJAbc8oYY1zVqryweqG22mJofxso_xso_xqI8Ab30o_amT1i_6sPwB4BjzpWk7_UZVnYWkz6QcCspcs</recordid><startdate>202208</startdate><enddate>202208</enddate><creator>Li, Bo</creator><creator>Xu, Dan</creator><creator>Zhou, Jie</creator><creator>Wang, Shou‐Chao</creator><creator>Cai, Yu‐Xiang</creator><creator>Li, Huan</creator><creator>Xu, Hai‐Bo</creator><general>John Wiley &amp; Sons, Inc</general><general>Wiley Subscription Services, Inc</general><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7QO</scope><scope>7TK</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>P64</scope><scope>7X8</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8451-8979</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>202208</creationdate><title>Monitoring Bevacizumab‐Induced Tumor Vascular Normalization by Intravoxel Incoherent Motion Diffusion‐Weighted MRI</title><author>Li, Bo ; Xu, Dan ; Zhou, Jie ; Wang, Shou‐Chao ; Cai, Yu‐Xiang ; Li, Huan ; Xu, Hai‐Bo</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c3572-fc9eab8160c4173801ddaf90505f5ccd61ca113ef980f6704567464700394e043</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2022</creationdate><topic>angiogenesis</topic><topic>Animal models</topic><topic>Bevacizumab</topic><topic>Blood vessels</topic><topic>Brain tumors</topic><topic>Correlation coefficient</topic><topic>Correlation coefficients</topic><topic>diffusion‐weighted imaging</topic><topic>Electron microscopes</topic><topic>Electron microscopy</topic><topic>Field strength</topic><topic>Glioma</topic><topic>Hypoxia</topic><topic>intravoxel incoherent motion</topic><topic>Magnetic resonance imaging</topic><topic>Medical imaging</topic><topic>microvessel density</topic><topic>Monitoring</topic><topic>Monitoring methods</topic><topic>Monoclonal antibodies</topic><topic>Parameters</topic><topic>Perfusion</topic><topic>pericyte coverage</topic><topic>Population studies</topic><topic>Statistical analysis</topic><topic>Statistical tests</topic><topic>Targeted cancer therapy</topic><topic>Telemedicine</topic><topic>Tight junctions</topic><topic>Tumors</topic><topic>Variance analysis</topic><topic>Windows (intervals)</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Li, Bo</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Xu, Dan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Zhou, Jie</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wang, Shou‐Chao</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Cai, Yu‐Xiang</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Li, Huan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Xu, Hai‐Bo</creatorcontrib><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Biotechnology Research Abstracts</collection><collection>Neurosciences Abstracts</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Health &amp; Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Biotechnology and BioEngineering Abstracts</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Journal of magnetic resonance imaging</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Li, Bo</au><au>Xu, Dan</au><au>Zhou, Jie</au><au>Wang, Shou‐Chao</au><au>Cai, Yu‐Xiang</au><au>Li, Huan</au><au>Xu, Hai‐Bo</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Monitoring Bevacizumab‐Induced Tumor Vascular Normalization by Intravoxel Incoherent Motion Diffusion‐Weighted MRI</atitle><jtitle>Journal of magnetic resonance imaging</jtitle><addtitle>J Magn Reson Imaging</addtitle><date>2022-08</date><risdate>2022</risdate><volume>56</volume><issue>2</issue><spage>427</spage><epage>439</epage><pages>427-439</pages><issn>1053-1807</issn><eissn>1522-2586</eissn><abstract>Background Accurate monitoring of tumor blood vessel normalization progression is beneficial to accurate treatment of patients. At present, there is a lack of safe and noninvasive monitoring methods. Purpose To serial monitor the vascular normalization time window of tumor antiangiogenesis treatment through intravoxel incoherent motion diffusion‐weighted imaging (IVIM‐DWI) and histopathological methods. Study Type Exploratory animal study. Population Sixty rat C6 glioma models were randomly and equally divided into the control groups (N = 30) and bevacizumab treatment groups (N = 30). Twenty‐five for magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) and five for electron microscope testing in each group. Field Strength/Sequence T1‐weighted imaging (T1WI), T2WI with a fast spin echo sequence and IVIM‐DWI with a spin‐echo echo‐planar imaging sequence at 3 T. Assessment IVIM‐DWI quantitative parameters (f, D, D*, and fD*) were obtained on days 0, 2, 4, 6, and 8 after bevacizumab treatment. After MRI, the microvessel density (MVD), pericyte coverage, and hypoxia‐inducible factor‐1α (HIF‐1α) were assessed. Electron microscope observation was performed at each time point. Statistical Tests One‐way analysis of variance and Student's t‐tests were used to compare differences within and between groups. Spearman's correlation coefficient (r) assess the correlation between IVIM and pathological parameters. The intragroup correlation coefficient was determined to assess the repeatability of each IVIM parameter. Results The IVIM‐DWI perfusion parameters (f and fD*) of the treated group were higher than the control group on days 2 and 4. Compared to the control group, MVD decreased on days 2 and pericyte coverage increased on days 4 in the treatment group. Electron microscopy showed that the tight junctions of the treatment group were prolonged on days 2–4. In the control group, f had the highest correlation with MVD (r = 0.689). In the treated group, f had a good correlation with pericyte coverage (r = 0.557), HIF‐1α had a moderately positive correlation with f (r = 0.480) and fD*(r = 0.447). Data Conclusion The vascular normalization time window of bevacizumab treatment of glioma was days 2–4 after antiangiogenesis treatment, which could be monitored noninvasively by IVIM‐DWI. Evidence Level 2 Technical Efficacy Stage 3</abstract><cop>Hoboken, USA</cop><pub>John Wiley &amp; Sons, Inc</pub><pmid>34873766</pmid><doi>10.1002/jmri.28012</doi><tpages>13</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8451-8979</orcidid></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 1053-1807
ispartof Journal of magnetic resonance imaging, 2022-08, Vol.56 (2), p.427-439
issn 1053-1807
1522-2586
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2607598079
source Access via Wiley Online Library
subjects angiogenesis
Animal models
Bevacizumab
Blood vessels
Brain tumors
Correlation coefficient
Correlation coefficients
diffusion‐weighted imaging
Electron microscopes
Electron microscopy
Field strength
Glioma
Hypoxia
intravoxel incoherent motion
Magnetic resonance imaging
Medical imaging
microvessel density
Monitoring
Monitoring methods
Monoclonal antibodies
Parameters
Perfusion
pericyte coverage
Population studies
Statistical analysis
Statistical tests
Targeted cancer therapy
Telemedicine
Tight junctions
Tumors
Variance analysis
Windows (intervals)
title Monitoring Bevacizumab‐Induced Tumor Vascular Normalization by Intravoxel Incoherent Motion Diffusion‐Weighted MRI
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-16T04%3A14%3A22IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Monitoring%20Bevacizumab%E2%80%90Induced%20Tumor%20Vascular%20Normalization%20by%20Intravoxel%20Incoherent%20Motion%20Diffusion%E2%80%90Weighted%20MRI&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20magnetic%20resonance%20imaging&rft.au=Li,%20Bo&rft.date=2022-08&rft.volume=56&rft.issue=2&rft.spage=427&rft.epage=439&rft.pages=427-439&rft.issn=1053-1807&rft.eissn=1522-2586&rft_id=info:doi/10.1002/jmri.28012&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2607598079%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2687676071&rft_id=info:pmid/34873766&rfr_iscdi=true