Low Anterior Resection Syndrome: Predisposing Factors and Treatment
Bowel dysfunction after restorative proctectomy, commonly referred to as Low Anterior Resection Syndrome (LARS), is a common long-term sequela of rectal cancer treatment that has a significant impact on a patient's quality of life. While the pathophysiology of LARS is poorly understood, its und...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Surgical oncology 2022-08, Vol.43, p.101691-101691, Article 101691 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 101691 |
---|---|
container_issue | |
container_start_page | 101691 |
container_title | Surgical oncology |
container_volume | 43 |
creator | Garfinkle, Richard Boutros, Marylise |
description | Bowel dysfunction after restorative proctectomy, commonly referred to as Low Anterior Resection Syndrome (LARS), is a common long-term sequela of rectal cancer treatment that has a significant impact on a patient's quality of life. While the pathophysiology of LARS is poorly understood, its underlying cause that it is likely multifactorial, and there are numerous patient, tumor, and treatment-level factors associated with its development. In accordance with these risk factors, several strategies have been proposed to mitigate LARS postoperatively, including modifications in the technical approach to restorative proctectomy and advancements in the multidisciplinary care of rectal cancer. Furthermore, a clinically applicable pre-operative nomogram has been developed to estimate the risk of LARS postoperatively, which may help in counseling patients before surgery. The management of LARS begins with identifying those who manifest symptoms, as postoperative bowel dysfunction often goes unrecognized. This goal is best achieved with the systematic screening of patients using validated Patient-Reported Outcome Measures. Once a patient with LARS is identified, conservative management strategies should be implemented. When available, a dedicated LARS nurse and/or multidisciplinary team can be an invaluable resource in engaging patients and educating them regarding LARS self-care. If symptoms of LARS persist or worsen over time despite conservative measures, second-line interventions such as transanal irrigation or pelvic floor rehabilitation, can be initiated. A small proportion of patients will ultimately require an intervention such as sacral neuromodulation or permanent colostomy for refractory, major LARS symptoms. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1016/j.suronc.2021.101691 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2607301741</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S0960740421001808</els_id><sourcerecordid>2709905027</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c367t-d310388d65169e3dbba7087b99ba458809c9c18b97f0f55ed4153ccd2d96515d3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kE1LxDAQhoMouH78Aw8FL166Tpq2aTwIy-KqsKDoeg5tMpWU3WRNWmX_vVnryYOngeF5X2YeQi4oTCnQ8rqbhsE7q6YZZPRnJegBmdCKi5SxDA7JBEQJKc8hPyYnIXQAUPKMTsh86b6Sme3RG-eTFwyoeuNs8rqz2rsN3iTPHrUJWxeMfU8WteqdD0ltdbLyWPcbtP0ZOWrrdcDz33lK3hZ3q_lDuny6f5zPlqliJe9TzSiwqtJlEe9Dppum5lDxRoimzouqAqGEolUjeAttUaDOacGU0pkWMVJodkquxt6tdx8Dhl5uTFC4XtcW3RBkVgJnQHlOI3r5B-3c4G28TmYchIACMh6pfKSUdyF4bOXWm03td5KC3GuUnRzNyr1ZOZqNsdsxhvHZT4NeBmXQqujJR31SO_N_wTfSp4JC</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2709905027</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Low Anterior Resection Syndrome: Predisposing Factors and Treatment</title><source>Access via ScienceDirect (Elsevier)</source><creator>Garfinkle, Richard ; Boutros, Marylise</creator><creatorcontrib>Garfinkle, Richard ; Boutros, Marylise</creatorcontrib><description>Bowel dysfunction after restorative proctectomy, commonly referred to as Low Anterior Resection Syndrome (LARS), is a common long-term sequela of rectal cancer treatment that has a significant impact on a patient's quality of life. While the pathophysiology of LARS is poorly understood, its underlying cause that it is likely multifactorial, and there are numerous patient, tumor, and treatment-level factors associated with its development. In accordance with these risk factors, several strategies have been proposed to mitigate LARS postoperatively, including modifications in the technical approach to restorative proctectomy and advancements in the multidisciplinary care of rectal cancer. Furthermore, a clinically applicable pre-operative nomogram has been developed to estimate the risk of LARS postoperatively, which may help in counseling patients before surgery. The management of LARS begins with identifying those who manifest symptoms, as postoperative bowel dysfunction often goes unrecognized. This goal is best achieved with the systematic screening of patients using validated Patient-Reported Outcome Measures. Once a patient with LARS is identified, conservative management strategies should be implemented. When available, a dedicated LARS nurse and/or multidisciplinary team can be an invaluable resource in engaging patients and educating them regarding LARS self-care. If symptoms of LARS persist or worsen over time despite conservative measures, second-line interventions such as transanal irrigation or pelvic floor rehabilitation, can be initiated. A small proportion of patients will ultimately require an intervention such as sacral neuromodulation or permanent colostomy for refractory, major LARS symptoms.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0960-7404</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1879-3320</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.suronc.2021.101691</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Oxford: Elsevier Ltd</publisher><subject>Bowel dysfunction ; Cancer ; Cancer therapies ; Colorectal cancer ; Denervation ; Fecal incontinence ; Feces ; Intestine ; Low anterior resection syndrome ; Management ; Medical prognosis ; Motility ; Neuromodulation ; Nomograms ; Ostomy ; Pathophysiology ; Patients ; Quality of life ; Radiation therapy ; Rectal cancer ; Rectum ; Rehabilitation ; Risk analysis ; Risk factors ; Sacrum ; Surgery ; Tumors</subject><ispartof>Surgical oncology, 2022-08, Vol.43, p.101691-101691, Article 101691</ispartof><rights>2021 Elsevier Ltd</rights><rights>2021. Elsevier Ltd</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c367t-d310388d65169e3dbba7087b99ba458809c9c18b97f0f55ed4153ccd2d96515d3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c367t-d310388d65169e3dbba7087b99ba458809c9c18b97f0f55ed4153ccd2d96515d3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.suronc.2021.101691$$EHTML$$P50$$Gelsevier$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,3550,27924,27925,45995</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Garfinkle, Richard</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Boutros, Marylise</creatorcontrib><title>Low Anterior Resection Syndrome: Predisposing Factors and Treatment</title><title>Surgical oncology</title><description>Bowel dysfunction after restorative proctectomy, commonly referred to as Low Anterior Resection Syndrome (LARS), is a common long-term sequela of rectal cancer treatment that has a significant impact on a patient's quality of life. While the pathophysiology of LARS is poorly understood, its underlying cause that it is likely multifactorial, and there are numerous patient, tumor, and treatment-level factors associated with its development. In accordance with these risk factors, several strategies have been proposed to mitigate LARS postoperatively, including modifications in the technical approach to restorative proctectomy and advancements in the multidisciplinary care of rectal cancer. Furthermore, a clinically applicable pre-operative nomogram has been developed to estimate the risk of LARS postoperatively, which may help in counseling patients before surgery. The management of LARS begins with identifying those who manifest symptoms, as postoperative bowel dysfunction often goes unrecognized. This goal is best achieved with the systematic screening of patients using validated Patient-Reported Outcome Measures. Once a patient with LARS is identified, conservative management strategies should be implemented. When available, a dedicated LARS nurse and/or multidisciplinary team can be an invaluable resource in engaging patients and educating them regarding LARS self-care. If symptoms of LARS persist or worsen over time despite conservative measures, second-line interventions such as transanal irrigation or pelvic floor rehabilitation, can be initiated. A small proportion of patients will ultimately require an intervention such as sacral neuromodulation or permanent colostomy for refractory, major LARS symptoms.</description><subject>Bowel dysfunction</subject><subject>Cancer</subject><subject>Cancer therapies</subject><subject>Colorectal cancer</subject><subject>Denervation</subject><subject>Fecal incontinence</subject><subject>Feces</subject><subject>Intestine</subject><subject>Low anterior resection syndrome</subject><subject>Management</subject><subject>Medical prognosis</subject><subject>Motility</subject><subject>Neuromodulation</subject><subject>Nomograms</subject><subject>Ostomy</subject><subject>Pathophysiology</subject><subject>Patients</subject><subject>Quality of life</subject><subject>Radiation therapy</subject><subject>Rectal cancer</subject><subject>Rectum</subject><subject>Rehabilitation</subject><subject>Risk analysis</subject><subject>Risk factors</subject><subject>Sacrum</subject><subject>Surgery</subject><subject>Tumors</subject><issn>0960-7404</issn><issn>1879-3320</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2022</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNp9kE1LxDAQhoMouH78Aw8FL166Tpq2aTwIy-KqsKDoeg5tMpWU3WRNWmX_vVnryYOngeF5X2YeQi4oTCnQ8rqbhsE7q6YZZPRnJegBmdCKi5SxDA7JBEQJKc8hPyYnIXQAUPKMTsh86b6Sme3RG-eTFwyoeuNs8rqz2rsN3iTPHrUJWxeMfU8WteqdD0ltdbLyWPcbtP0ZOWrrdcDz33lK3hZ3q_lDuny6f5zPlqliJe9TzSiwqtJlEe9Dppum5lDxRoimzouqAqGEolUjeAttUaDOacGU0pkWMVJodkquxt6tdx8Dhl5uTFC4XtcW3RBkVgJnQHlOI3r5B-3c4G28TmYchIACMh6pfKSUdyF4bOXWm03td5KC3GuUnRzNyr1ZOZqNsdsxhvHZT4NeBmXQqujJR31SO_N_wTfSp4JC</recordid><startdate>20220801</startdate><enddate>20220801</enddate><creator>Garfinkle, Richard</creator><creator>Boutros, Marylise</creator><general>Elsevier Ltd</general><general>Elsevier Limited</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7QO</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>P64</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20220801</creationdate><title>Low Anterior Resection Syndrome: Predisposing Factors and Treatment</title><author>Garfinkle, Richard ; Boutros, Marylise</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c367t-d310388d65169e3dbba7087b99ba458809c9c18b97f0f55ed4153ccd2d96515d3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2022</creationdate><topic>Bowel dysfunction</topic><topic>Cancer</topic><topic>Cancer therapies</topic><topic>Colorectal cancer</topic><topic>Denervation</topic><topic>Fecal incontinence</topic><topic>Feces</topic><topic>Intestine</topic><topic>Low anterior resection syndrome</topic><topic>Management</topic><topic>Medical prognosis</topic><topic>Motility</topic><topic>Neuromodulation</topic><topic>Nomograms</topic><topic>Ostomy</topic><topic>Pathophysiology</topic><topic>Patients</topic><topic>Quality of life</topic><topic>Radiation therapy</topic><topic>Rectal cancer</topic><topic>Rectum</topic><topic>Rehabilitation</topic><topic>Risk analysis</topic><topic>Risk factors</topic><topic>Sacrum</topic><topic>Surgery</topic><topic>Tumors</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Garfinkle, Richard</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Boutros, Marylise</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Biotechnology Research Abstracts</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Biotechnology and BioEngineering Abstracts</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Surgical oncology</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Garfinkle, Richard</au><au>Boutros, Marylise</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Low Anterior Resection Syndrome: Predisposing Factors and Treatment</atitle><jtitle>Surgical oncology</jtitle><date>2022-08-01</date><risdate>2022</risdate><volume>43</volume><spage>101691</spage><epage>101691</epage><pages>101691-101691</pages><artnum>101691</artnum><issn>0960-7404</issn><eissn>1879-3320</eissn><abstract>Bowel dysfunction after restorative proctectomy, commonly referred to as Low Anterior Resection Syndrome (LARS), is a common long-term sequela of rectal cancer treatment that has a significant impact on a patient's quality of life. While the pathophysiology of LARS is poorly understood, its underlying cause that it is likely multifactorial, and there are numerous patient, tumor, and treatment-level factors associated with its development. In accordance with these risk factors, several strategies have been proposed to mitigate LARS postoperatively, including modifications in the technical approach to restorative proctectomy and advancements in the multidisciplinary care of rectal cancer. Furthermore, a clinically applicable pre-operative nomogram has been developed to estimate the risk of LARS postoperatively, which may help in counseling patients before surgery. The management of LARS begins with identifying those who manifest symptoms, as postoperative bowel dysfunction often goes unrecognized. This goal is best achieved with the systematic screening of patients using validated Patient-Reported Outcome Measures. Once a patient with LARS is identified, conservative management strategies should be implemented. When available, a dedicated LARS nurse and/or multidisciplinary team can be an invaluable resource in engaging patients and educating them regarding LARS self-care. If symptoms of LARS persist or worsen over time despite conservative measures, second-line interventions such as transanal irrigation or pelvic floor rehabilitation, can be initiated. A small proportion of patients will ultimately require an intervention such as sacral neuromodulation or permanent colostomy for refractory, major LARS symptoms.</abstract><cop>Oxford</cop><pub>Elsevier Ltd</pub><doi>10.1016/j.suronc.2021.101691</doi><tpages>1</tpages></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0960-7404 |
ispartof | Surgical oncology, 2022-08, Vol.43, p.101691-101691, Article 101691 |
issn | 0960-7404 1879-3320 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2607301741 |
source | Access via ScienceDirect (Elsevier) |
subjects | Bowel dysfunction Cancer Cancer therapies Colorectal cancer Denervation Fecal incontinence Feces Intestine Low anterior resection syndrome Management Medical prognosis Motility Neuromodulation Nomograms Ostomy Pathophysiology Patients Quality of life Radiation therapy Rectal cancer Rectum Rehabilitation Risk analysis Risk factors Sacrum Surgery Tumors |
title | Low Anterior Resection Syndrome: Predisposing Factors and Treatment |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-21T13%3A11%3A17IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Low%20Anterior%20Resection%20Syndrome:%20Predisposing%20Factors%20and%20Treatment&rft.jtitle=Surgical%20oncology&rft.au=Garfinkle,%20Richard&rft.date=2022-08-01&rft.volume=43&rft.spage=101691&rft.epage=101691&rft.pages=101691-101691&rft.artnum=101691&rft.issn=0960-7404&rft.eissn=1879-3320&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.suronc.2021.101691&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2709905027%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2709905027&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_els_id=S0960740421001808&rfr_iscdi=true |