Preference of Women for Gestational Diabetes Screening Method According to Tolerance of Tests and Population Characteristics

AimsTo determine the preferred method of screening for gestational diabetes mellitus (GDM). Methods1804 women from a prospective study (NCT02036619) received a glucose challenge test (GCT) and 75g oral glucose tolerance test (OGTT) between 24-28 weeks. Tolerance of screening tests and preference for...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Frontiers in endocrinology (Lausanne) 2021-11, Vol.12, p.781384-781384, Article 781384
Hauptverfasser: Raets, Lore, Vandewinkel, Marie, Van Crombrugge, Paul, Moyson, Carolien, Verhaeghe, Johan, Vandeginste, Sofie, Verlaenen, Hilde, Vercammen, Chris, Maes, Toon, Dufraimont, Els, Roggen, Nele, De Block, Christophe, Jacquemyn, Yves, Mekahli, Farah, De Clippel, Katrien, van den Bruel, Annick, Loccufier, Anne, Laenen, Annouschka, Devlieger, Roland, Mathieu, Chantal, Benhalima, Katrien
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:AimsTo determine the preferred method of screening for gestational diabetes mellitus (GDM). Methods1804 women from a prospective study (NCT02036619) received a glucose challenge test (GCT) and 75g oral glucose tolerance test (OGTT) between 24-28 weeks. Tolerance of screening tests and preference for screening strategy (two-step screening strategy with GCT compared to one-step screening strategy with OGTT) were evaluated by a self-designed questionnaire at the time of the GCT and OGTT. ResultsCompared to women who preferred one-step screening [26.2% (472)], women who preferred two-step screening [46.3% (834)] were less often from a minor ethnic background [6.0% (50) vs. 10.7% (50), p=0.003], had less often a previous history of GDM [7.3% (29) vs. 13.8% (32), p=0.008], were less often overweight or obese [respectively 23.1% (50) vs. 24.8% (116), p
ISSN:1664-2392
1664-2392
DOI:10.3389/fendo.2021.781384