Mortality and functional outcomes of fragility fractures of the pelvis by fracture type with conservative treatment: a retrospective, multicenter TRON study

Purpose Fragility fractures of the pelvis (FFP) are becoming a commonly encountered disease in aging societies. We aimed to (1) clarify the overall survival rate of FFP, (2) compare survival rates by Rommens and Hofmann classification FFP type, (3) investigate the complications during hospitalizatio...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:European journal of trauma and emergency surgery (Munich : 2007) 2022-08, Vol.48 (4), p.2897-2904
Hauptverfasser: Omichi, Toshifumi, Takegami, Yasuhiko, Tokutake, Katsuhiro, Saito, Yuki, Ito, Osamu, Ando, Toshihiro, Imagama, Shiro
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 2904
container_issue 4
container_start_page 2897
container_title European journal of trauma and emergency surgery (Munich : 2007)
container_volume 48
creator Omichi, Toshifumi
Takegami, Yasuhiko
Tokutake, Katsuhiro
Saito, Yuki
Ito, Osamu
Ando, Toshihiro
Imagama, Shiro
description Purpose Fragility fractures of the pelvis (FFP) are becoming a commonly encountered disease in aging societies. We aimed to (1) clarify the overall survival rate of FFP, (2) compare survival rates by Rommens and Hofmann classification FFP type, (3) investigate the complications during hospitalization, and (4) investigate walking ability before and after injury depending on the type of fracture in patients with FFP treated conservatively. Methods This retrospective, multicenter study included 867 patients with FFP treated conservatively between 2014 and 2018 and excluded patients with insufficient follow-up for two years, lost data, and operative cases. This is a retrospective multicenter study. We established the database, which is named as TRON. We evaluated survival rate by fracture type using the log-rank test. We compared walking ability as defined by a new mobility score and the modified Majeed Pelvic Score among fracture types. Results We reviewed 552 cases (98 males and 454 females) with conservative treatment. The overall survival rates of patients with FFP treated conservatively were 0.90 at 1 year and 0.83 at 2 years. Although the survival rate was the lowest in FFP Type III, there was no significant difference in survival rates between fracture types ( P  = 0.143). The rates of complications during hospitalization were high for both Type III and Type IV fractures. Walking ability post-injury was worse in the patients with Type III fracture. Conclusions The survival rate of patients treated by conservative treatment was relatively good. Type III in the Rommens and Hofmann classification was related to lower life expectancy and loss of walking ability.
doi_str_mv 10.1007/s00068-021-01839-1
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2605230004</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2605230004</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c352t-40c83474273d35f33a86c9f328669c2d80094a917f9339512d02dbdfb07eb57b3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kU1P3DAQhiMEEgv0D_RkqZceGvBHPuzeEGoL0tKV0HK2HGe8GCVxsJ2t9r_wY-vdVCD1wGlG8z7vSDNvln0m-JJgXF8FjHHFc0xJjglnIidH2YLwiuVCFOT4rWfsNDsL4TnRuCrpInu9dz6qzsYdUkOLzDToaN2gOuSmqF0PATmDjFcbe4BSp-Pk53F8AjRCt7UBNe8SirsR0B8bn5B2QwC_VdFu09iDij0M8TtSyEP0Loyg99I31E9dtDpp4NH6YfUbhTi1u4vsxKguwKd_9Tx7_PljfXObL1e_7m6ul7lmJY15gTVnRV3QmrWsNIwpXmlhGOVVJTRtOcaiUILUJt0vSkJbTNumNQ2uoSnrhp1nX-e9o3cvE4Qoexs0dJ0awE1B0gqXlKUXFwn98h_67Caf_rWnhOCUs3JP0ZnS6cjgwcjR2175nSRY7gOTc2AyBSYPgUmSTGw2hQQPG_Dvqz9w_QUfq5tf</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2699828354</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Mortality and functional outcomes of fragility fractures of the pelvis by fracture type with conservative treatment: a retrospective, multicenter TRON study</title><source>SpringerLink Journals - AutoHoldings</source><creator>Omichi, Toshifumi ; Takegami, Yasuhiko ; Tokutake, Katsuhiro ; Saito, Yuki ; Ito, Osamu ; Ando, Toshihiro ; Imagama, Shiro</creator><creatorcontrib>Omichi, Toshifumi ; Takegami, Yasuhiko ; Tokutake, Katsuhiro ; Saito, Yuki ; Ito, Osamu ; Ando, Toshihiro ; Imagama, Shiro</creatorcontrib><description>Purpose Fragility fractures of the pelvis (FFP) are becoming a commonly encountered disease in aging societies. We aimed to (1) clarify the overall survival rate of FFP, (2) compare survival rates by Rommens and Hofmann classification FFP type, (3) investigate the complications during hospitalization, and (4) investigate walking ability before and after injury depending on the type of fracture in patients with FFP treated conservatively. Methods This retrospective, multicenter study included 867 patients with FFP treated conservatively between 2014 and 2018 and excluded patients with insufficient follow-up for two years, lost data, and operative cases. This is a retrospective multicenter study. We established the database, which is named as TRON. We evaluated survival rate by fracture type using the log-rank test. We compared walking ability as defined by a new mobility score and the modified Majeed Pelvic Score among fracture types. Results We reviewed 552 cases (98 males and 454 females) with conservative treatment. The overall survival rates of patients with FFP treated conservatively were 0.90 at 1 year and 0.83 at 2 years. Although the survival rate was the lowest in FFP Type III, there was no significant difference in survival rates between fracture types ( P  = 0.143). The rates of complications during hospitalization were high for both Type III and Type IV fractures. Walking ability post-injury was worse in the patients with Type III fracture. Conclusions The survival rate of patients treated by conservative treatment was relatively good. Type III in the Rommens and Hofmann classification was related to lower life expectancy and loss of walking ability.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1863-9933</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1863-9941</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1007/s00068-021-01839-1</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Berlin/Heidelberg: Springer Berlin Heidelberg</publisher><subject>Clinical outcomes ; Critical Care Medicine ; Emergency Medicine ; Fractures ; Frailty ; Hospitalization ; Intensive ; Medicine ; Medicine &amp; Public Health ; Mortality ; Older people ; Original Article ; Pelvis ; Recovery (Medical) ; Sports Medicine ; Surgery ; Surgical Orthopedics ; Traumatic Surgery ; Walking</subject><ispartof>European journal of trauma and emergency surgery (Munich : 2007), 2022-08, Vol.48 (4), p.2897-2904</ispartof><rights>The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany 2021</rights><rights>The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany 2021.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c352t-40c83474273d35f33a86c9f328669c2d80094a917f9339512d02dbdfb07eb57b3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c352t-40c83474273d35f33a86c9f328669c2d80094a917f9339512d02dbdfb07eb57b3</cites><orcidid>0000-0001-9279-8301</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1007/s00068-021-01839-1$$EPDF$$P50$$Gspringer$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://link.springer.com/10.1007/s00068-021-01839-1$$EHTML$$P50$$Gspringer$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,27901,27902,41464,42533,51294</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Omichi, Toshifumi</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Takegami, Yasuhiko</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Tokutake, Katsuhiro</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Saito, Yuki</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ito, Osamu</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ando, Toshihiro</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Imagama, Shiro</creatorcontrib><title>Mortality and functional outcomes of fragility fractures of the pelvis by fracture type with conservative treatment: a retrospective, multicenter TRON study</title><title>European journal of trauma and emergency surgery (Munich : 2007)</title><addtitle>Eur J Trauma Emerg Surg</addtitle><description>Purpose Fragility fractures of the pelvis (FFP) are becoming a commonly encountered disease in aging societies. We aimed to (1) clarify the overall survival rate of FFP, (2) compare survival rates by Rommens and Hofmann classification FFP type, (3) investigate the complications during hospitalization, and (4) investigate walking ability before and after injury depending on the type of fracture in patients with FFP treated conservatively. Methods This retrospective, multicenter study included 867 patients with FFP treated conservatively between 2014 and 2018 and excluded patients with insufficient follow-up for two years, lost data, and operative cases. This is a retrospective multicenter study. We established the database, which is named as TRON. We evaluated survival rate by fracture type using the log-rank test. We compared walking ability as defined by a new mobility score and the modified Majeed Pelvic Score among fracture types. Results We reviewed 552 cases (98 males and 454 females) with conservative treatment. The overall survival rates of patients with FFP treated conservatively were 0.90 at 1 year and 0.83 at 2 years. Although the survival rate was the lowest in FFP Type III, there was no significant difference in survival rates between fracture types ( P  = 0.143). The rates of complications during hospitalization were high for both Type III and Type IV fractures. Walking ability post-injury was worse in the patients with Type III fracture. Conclusions The survival rate of patients treated by conservative treatment was relatively good. Type III in the Rommens and Hofmann classification was related to lower life expectancy and loss of walking ability.</description><subject>Clinical outcomes</subject><subject>Critical Care Medicine</subject><subject>Emergency Medicine</subject><subject>Fractures</subject><subject>Frailty</subject><subject>Hospitalization</subject><subject>Intensive</subject><subject>Medicine</subject><subject>Medicine &amp; Public Health</subject><subject>Mortality</subject><subject>Older people</subject><subject>Original Article</subject><subject>Pelvis</subject><subject>Recovery (Medical)</subject><subject>Sports Medicine</subject><subject>Surgery</subject><subject>Surgical Orthopedics</subject><subject>Traumatic Surgery</subject><subject>Walking</subject><issn>1863-9933</issn><issn>1863-9941</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2022</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>8G5</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>GUQSH</sourceid><sourceid>M2O</sourceid><recordid>eNp9kU1P3DAQhiMEEgv0D_RkqZceGvBHPuzeEGoL0tKV0HK2HGe8GCVxsJ2t9r_wY-vdVCD1wGlG8z7vSDNvln0m-JJgXF8FjHHFc0xJjglnIidH2YLwiuVCFOT4rWfsNDsL4TnRuCrpInu9dz6qzsYdUkOLzDToaN2gOuSmqF0PATmDjFcbe4BSp-Pk53F8AjRCt7UBNe8SirsR0B8bn5B2QwC_VdFu09iDij0M8TtSyEP0Loyg99I31E9dtDpp4NH6YfUbhTi1u4vsxKguwKd_9Tx7_PljfXObL1e_7m6ul7lmJY15gTVnRV3QmrWsNIwpXmlhGOVVJTRtOcaiUILUJt0vSkJbTNumNQ2uoSnrhp1nX-e9o3cvE4Qoexs0dJ0awE1B0gqXlKUXFwn98h_67Caf_rWnhOCUs3JP0ZnS6cjgwcjR2175nSRY7gOTc2AyBSYPgUmSTGw2hQQPG_Dvqz9w_QUfq5tf</recordid><startdate>20220801</startdate><enddate>20220801</enddate><creator>Omichi, Toshifumi</creator><creator>Takegami, Yasuhiko</creator><creator>Tokutake, Katsuhiro</creator><creator>Saito, Yuki</creator><creator>Ito, Osamu</creator><creator>Ando, Toshihiro</creator><creator>Imagama, Shiro</creator><general>Springer Berlin Heidelberg</general><general>Springer Nature B.V</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7RV</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88E</scope><scope>8AO</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>8G5</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>GUQSH</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>KB0</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>M1P</scope><scope>M2O</scope><scope>MBDVC</scope><scope>NAPCQ</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>Q9U</scope><scope>7X8</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9279-8301</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20220801</creationdate><title>Mortality and functional outcomes of fragility fractures of the pelvis by fracture type with conservative treatment: a retrospective, multicenter TRON study</title><author>Omichi, Toshifumi ; Takegami, Yasuhiko ; Tokutake, Katsuhiro ; Saito, Yuki ; Ito, Osamu ; Ando, Toshihiro ; Imagama, Shiro</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c352t-40c83474273d35f33a86c9f328669c2d80094a917f9339512d02dbdfb07eb57b3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2022</creationdate><topic>Clinical outcomes</topic><topic>Critical Care Medicine</topic><topic>Emergency Medicine</topic><topic>Fractures</topic><topic>Frailty</topic><topic>Hospitalization</topic><topic>Intensive</topic><topic>Medicine</topic><topic>Medicine &amp; Public Health</topic><topic>Mortality</topic><topic>Older people</topic><topic>Original Article</topic><topic>Pelvis</topic><topic>Recovery (Medical)</topic><topic>Sports Medicine</topic><topic>Surgery</topic><topic>Surgical Orthopedics</topic><topic>Traumatic Surgery</topic><topic>Walking</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Omichi, Toshifumi</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Takegami, Yasuhiko</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Tokutake, Katsuhiro</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Saito, Yuki</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ito, Osamu</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ando, Toshihiro</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Imagama, Shiro</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Nursing &amp; Allied Health Database</collection><collection>Health &amp; Medical Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Medical Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Pharma Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Research Library (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>Research Library Prep</collection><collection>ProQuest Health &amp; Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Nursing &amp; Allied Health Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Health &amp; Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Medical Database</collection><collection>Research Library</collection><collection>Research Library (Corporate)</collection><collection>Nursing &amp; Allied Health Premium</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>European journal of trauma and emergency surgery (Munich : 2007)</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Omichi, Toshifumi</au><au>Takegami, Yasuhiko</au><au>Tokutake, Katsuhiro</au><au>Saito, Yuki</au><au>Ito, Osamu</au><au>Ando, Toshihiro</au><au>Imagama, Shiro</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Mortality and functional outcomes of fragility fractures of the pelvis by fracture type with conservative treatment: a retrospective, multicenter TRON study</atitle><jtitle>European journal of trauma and emergency surgery (Munich : 2007)</jtitle><stitle>Eur J Trauma Emerg Surg</stitle><date>2022-08-01</date><risdate>2022</risdate><volume>48</volume><issue>4</issue><spage>2897</spage><epage>2904</epage><pages>2897-2904</pages><issn>1863-9933</issn><eissn>1863-9941</eissn><abstract>Purpose Fragility fractures of the pelvis (FFP) are becoming a commonly encountered disease in aging societies. We aimed to (1) clarify the overall survival rate of FFP, (2) compare survival rates by Rommens and Hofmann classification FFP type, (3) investigate the complications during hospitalization, and (4) investigate walking ability before and after injury depending on the type of fracture in patients with FFP treated conservatively. Methods This retrospective, multicenter study included 867 patients with FFP treated conservatively between 2014 and 2018 and excluded patients with insufficient follow-up for two years, lost data, and operative cases. This is a retrospective multicenter study. We established the database, which is named as TRON. We evaluated survival rate by fracture type using the log-rank test. We compared walking ability as defined by a new mobility score and the modified Majeed Pelvic Score among fracture types. Results We reviewed 552 cases (98 males and 454 females) with conservative treatment. The overall survival rates of patients with FFP treated conservatively were 0.90 at 1 year and 0.83 at 2 years. Although the survival rate was the lowest in FFP Type III, there was no significant difference in survival rates between fracture types ( P  = 0.143). The rates of complications during hospitalization were high for both Type III and Type IV fractures. Walking ability post-injury was worse in the patients with Type III fracture. Conclusions The survival rate of patients treated by conservative treatment was relatively good. Type III in the Rommens and Hofmann classification was related to lower life expectancy and loss of walking ability.</abstract><cop>Berlin/Heidelberg</cop><pub>Springer Berlin Heidelberg</pub><doi>10.1007/s00068-021-01839-1</doi><tpages>8</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9279-8301</orcidid></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 1863-9933
ispartof European journal of trauma and emergency surgery (Munich : 2007), 2022-08, Vol.48 (4), p.2897-2904
issn 1863-9933
1863-9941
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2605230004
source SpringerLink Journals - AutoHoldings
subjects Clinical outcomes
Critical Care Medicine
Emergency Medicine
Fractures
Frailty
Hospitalization
Intensive
Medicine
Medicine & Public Health
Mortality
Older people
Original Article
Pelvis
Recovery (Medical)
Sports Medicine
Surgery
Surgical Orthopedics
Traumatic Surgery
Walking
title Mortality and functional outcomes of fragility fractures of the pelvis by fracture type with conservative treatment: a retrospective, multicenter TRON study
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-29T19%3A10%3A02IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Mortality%20and%20functional%20outcomes%20of%20fragility%20fractures%20of%20the%20pelvis%20by%20fracture%20type%20with%20conservative%20treatment:%20a%20retrospective,%20multicenter%20TRON%20study&rft.jtitle=European%20journal%20of%20trauma%20and%20emergency%20surgery%20(Munich%20:%202007)&rft.au=Omichi,%20Toshifumi&rft.date=2022-08-01&rft.volume=48&rft.issue=4&rft.spage=2897&rft.epage=2904&rft.pages=2897-2904&rft.issn=1863-9933&rft.eissn=1863-9941&rft_id=info:doi/10.1007/s00068-021-01839-1&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2605230004%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2699828354&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true