Exploring safety knowledge sharing among experienced and novice workers
•We investigated how individuals generate, share, and learn safety knowledge.•Members of a culinary and hospitality arts program were interviewed.•Safety knowledge was shared and learned via social and identity mechanisms.•Safety knowledge sharing relied on novices and experienced members interactin...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Journal of safety research 2021-12, Vol.79, p.125-134 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
Zusammenfassung: | •We investigated how individuals generate, share, and learn safety knowledge.•Members of a culinary and hospitality arts program were interviewed.•Safety knowledge was shared and learned via social and identity mechanisms.•Safety knowledge sharing relied on novices and experienced members interacting.•A deep, collective understanding of what safety meant was labeled “common sense”.•Common sense is shared, developed via practice, and enables a professional identity.
Introduction: This paper investigates how members of a culinary and hospitality arts program generate, share, and learn safety knowledge via social and identity mechanisms. Method: We conducted semi-structured interviews with 20 participants of varying roles and experience (i.e., students, culinary instructors, and restaurant chefs) in the culinary and hospitality arts program at a large polytechnic in western Canada. Results: The emergent themes from these interviews indicated that the circulation of safety knowledge relied on the interaction among individuals with various levels of experience, such that those who were more experienced in the culinary arts were able to share safety knowledge with novices, who had less experience. Comparing safety knowledge gleaned from within the school against that gleaned from within the industry highlighted differences between the construction of safety in the two contexts. Notably, many aspects of safety knowledge are not learned in school and those that are may not apply in the industry context. We found that safety knowledge was shared through informal means such as storytelling, a process that allowed members to come to a deep, collective understanding of what safety meant, which they often labeled “common sense.” Conclusion: We found that safety knowledge was a currency through which participants achieved legitimacy, generated through continual practical accomplishment of the work in interaction with others. Practical Applications: Our findings provide novel insights into how safety knowledge is shared, and we discuss the implications of these findings for classroom, work-based learning, and other forms of curricula. |
---|---|
ISSN: | 0022-4375 1879-1247 |
DOI: | 10.1016/j.jsr.2021.08.013 |