The effect of perceptual processing fluency and value on metacognition and remembering
Previous research has indicated that perceptual processing fluency significantly affects metacognitive predictions of performance but not learning outcomes. In the present study, we examined the differential impact of perceptual processing fluency and an item’s value on metacognition and recall. We...
Gespeichert in:
| Veröffentlicht in: | Psychonomic bulletin & review 2022-06, Vol.29 (3), p.910-921 |
|---|---|
| Hauptverfasser: | , , , |
| Format: | Artikel |
| Sprache: | eng |
| Schlagworte: | |
| Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
| Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
| container_end_page | 921 |
|---|---|
| container_issue | 3 |
| container_start_page | 910 |
| container_title | Psychonomic bulletin & review |
| container_volume | 29 |
| creator | Murphy, Dillon H. Huckins, Stephen C. Rhodes, Matthew G. Castel, Alan D. |
| description | Previous research has indicated that perceptual processing fluency significantly affects metacognitive predictions of performance but not learning outcomes. In the present study, we examined the differential impact of perceptual processing fluency and an item’s value on metacognition and recall. We presented participants with words visually and audibly, with each word paired with a point value counting towards participants’ scores if recalled. The words were either highly perceptually fluent (large font, loud volume) or less perceptually fluent (small font, low volume). Results revealed that both metacognitive monitoring (JOLs) and recall were sensitive to perceptual processing fluency as well as value, but the magnitude of the effect of value was significantly greater than that of font size. Specifically, high-value words were better remembered than low-value words, regardless of fluency, and participants’ judgments mapped onto their selectivity for valuable information. Thus, the current study revealed the differential effects of intrinsic and extrinsic cues on metacognitive monitoring and later remembering such that the cues that can influence monitoring in certain encoding conditions become less impactful when pitted against other intrinsic cues in different encoding conditions. |
| doi_str_mv | 10.3758/s13423-021-02030-8 |
| format | Article |
| fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2604832450</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2674462532</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c419t-a0ba88267e1952a97c80ab91f35a991d35b34d4eda6496090ef5bec3aff21803</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kMtKBDEQRYMojo7-gAsJuHHTmvckSxl8geBmcBvS6Yq29MukW_DvzTijggsXISly6lZxEDqh5IIvpL5MlAvGC8JoPoSTQu-gAyo5LSRnZDe_iTKF4VrM0GFKr4QQqYzaRzMutFBKmwP0tHoBDCGAH3Ef8ADRwzBOrsFD7D2kVHfPODQTdP4Du67C7y4XuO9wC6Pz_XNXj3Wu1l8RWmhLiLnlCO0F1yQ43t5ztLq5Xi3viofH2_vl1UPhBTVj4UjptGZqAdRI5szCa-JKQwOXzhhacVlyUQmonBJGEUMgyBI8dyEwqgmfo_NNbF72bYI02rZOHprGddBPyTJFhOZMyDV69gd97afY5eUytRBCsSwtU2xD-dinFCHYIdatix-WEruWbjfSbZZuv6RbnZtOt9FT2UL10_JtOQN8A6RhLQfi7-x_Yj8B9mWMoA</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2674462532</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>The effect of perceptual processing fluency and value on metacognition and remembering</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Springer Nature - Complete Springer Journals</source><source>Elektronische Zeitschriftenbibliothek - Frei zugängliche E-Journals</source><creator>Murphy, Dillon H. ; Huckins, Stephen C. ; Rhodes, Matthew G. ; Castel, Alan D.</creator><creatorcontrib>Murphy, Dillon H. ; Huckins, Stephen C. ; Rhodes, Matthew G. ; Castel, Alan D.</creatorcontrib><description>Previous research has indicated that perceptual processing fluency significantly affects metacognitive predictions of performance but not learning outcomes. In the present study, we examined the differential impact of perceptual processing fluency and an item’s value on metacognition and recall. We presented participants with words visually and audibly, with each word paired with a point value counting towards participants’ scores if recalled. The words were either highly perceptually fluent (large font, loud volume) or less perceptually fluent (small font, low volume). Results revealed that both metacognitive monitoring (JOLs) and recall were sensitive to perceptual processing fluency as well as value, but the magnitude of the effect of value was significantly greater than that of font size. Specifically, high-value words were better remembered than low-value words, regardless of fluency, and participants’ judgments mapped onto their selectivity for valuable information. Thus, the current study revealed the differential effects of intrinsic and extrinsic cues on metacognitive monitoring and later remembering such that the cues that can influence monitoring in certain encoding conditions become less impactful when pitted against other intrinsic cues in different encoding conditions.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1069-9384</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1531-5320</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.3758/s13423-021-02030-8</identifier><identifier>PMID: 34846689</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>New York: Springer US</publisher><subject>Behavioral Science and Psychology ; Brief Report ; Cognitive Psychology ; Cues ; Humans ; Judgment ; Learning ; Mental Recall ; Metacognition ; Psychology</subject><ispartof>Psychonomic bulletin & review, 2022-06, Vol.29 (3), p.910-921</ispartof><rights>The Psychonomic Society, Inc. 2021</rights><rights>2021. The Psychonomic Society, Inc.</rights><rights>Copyright Springer Nature B.V. Jun 2022</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c419t-a0ba88267e1952a97c80ab91f35a991d35b34d4eda6496090ef5bec3aff21803</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c419t-a0ba88267e1952a97c80ab91f35a991d35b34d4eda6496090ef5bec3aff21803</cites><orcidid>0000-0002-5604-3494 ; 0000-0003-1965-8227</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.3758/s13423-021-02030-8$$EPDF$$P50$$Gspringer$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://link.springer.com/10.3758/s13423-021-02030-8$$EHTML$$P50$$Gspringer$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,27901,27902,41464,42533,51294</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34846689$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Murphy, Dillon H.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Huckins, Stephen C.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Rhodes, Matthew G.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Castel, Alan D.</creatorcontrib><title>The effect of perceptual processing fluency and value on metacognition and remembering</title><title>Psychonomic bulletin & review</title><addtitle>Psychon Bull Rev</addtitle><addtitle>Psychon Bull Rev</addtitle><description>Previous research has indicated that perceptual processing fluency significantly affects metacognitive predictions of performance but not learning outcomes. In the present study, we examined the differential impact of perceptual processing fluency and an item’s value on metacognition and recall. We presented participants with words visually and audibly, with each word paired with a point value counting towards participants’ scores if recalled. The words were either highly perceptually fluent (large font, loud volume) or less perceptually fluent (small font, low volume). Results revealed that both metacognitive monitoring (JOLs) and recall were sensitive to perceptual processing fluency as well as value, but the magnitude of the effect of value was significantly greater than that of font size. Specifically, high-value words were better remembered than low-value words, regardless of fluency, and participants’ judgments mapped onto their selectivity for valuable information. Thus, the current study revealed the differential effects of intrinsic and extrinsic cues on metacognitive monitoring and later remembering such that the cues that can influence monitoring in certain encoding conditions become less impactful when pitted against other intrinsic cues in different encoding conditions.</description><subject>Behavioral Science and Psychology</subject><subject>Brief Report</subject><subject>Cognitive Psychology</subject><subject>Cues</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Judgment</subject><subject>Learning</subject><subject>Mental Recall</subject><subject>Metacognition</subject><subject>Psychology</subject><issn>1069-9384</issn><issn>1531-5320</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2022</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><sourceid>8G5</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>GUQSH</sourceid><sourceid>M2O</sourceid><recordid>eNp9kMtKBDEQRYMojo7-gAsJuHHTmvckSxl8geBmcBvS6Yq29MukW_DvzTijggsXISly6lZxEDqh5IIvpL5MlAvGC8JoPoSTQu-gAyo5LSRnZDe_iTKF4VrM0GFKr4QQqYzaRzMutFBKmwP0tHoBDCGAH3Ef8ADRwzBOrsFD7D2kVHfPODQTdP4Du67C7y4XuO9wC6Pz_XNXj3Wu1l8RWmhLiLnlCO0F1yQ43t5ztLq5Xi3viofH2_vl1UPhBTVj4UjptGZqAdRI5szCa-JKQwOXzhhacVlyUQmonBJGEUMgyBI8dyEwqgmfo_NNbF72bYI02rZOHprGddBPyTJFhOZMyDV69gd97afY5eUytRBCsSwtU2xD-dinFCHYIdatix-WEruWbjfSbZZuv6RbnZtOt9FT2UL10_JtOQN8A6RhLQfi7-x_Yj8B9mWMoA</recordid><startdate>20220601</startdate><enddate>20220601</enddate><creator>Murphy, Dillon H.</creator><creator>Huckins, Stephen C.</creator><creator>Rhodes, Matthew G.</creator><creator>Castel, Alan D.</creator><general>Springer US</general><general>Springer Nature B.V</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>4T-</scope><scope>4U-</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88E</scope><scope>88G</scope><scope>8AO</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>8G5</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>GUQSH</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>M1P</scope><scope>M2M</scope><scope>M2O</scope><scope>MBDVC</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>PSYQQ</scope><scope>Q9U</scope><scope>7X8</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5604-3494</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1965-8227</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20220601</creationdate><title>The effect of perceptual processing fluency and value on metacognition and remembering</title><author>Murphy, Dillon H. ; Huckins, Stephen C. ; Rhodes, Matthew G. ; Castel, Alan D.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c419t-a0ba88267e1952a97c80ab91f35a991d35b34d4eda6496090ef5bec3aff21803</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2022</creationdate><topic>Behavioral Science and Psychology</topic><topic>Brief Report</topic><topic>Cognitive Psychology</topic><topic>Cues</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Judgment</topic><topic>Learning</topic><topic>Mental Recall</topic><topic>Metacognition</topic><topic>Psychology</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Murphy, Dillon H.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Huckins, Stephen C.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Rhodes, Matthew G.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Castel, Alan D.</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Docstoc</collection><collection>University Readers</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Medical Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Psychology Database (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Pharma Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Research Library (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>Research Library Prep</collection><collection>ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Medical Database</collection><collection>Psychology Database</collection><collection>Research Library</collection><collection>Research Library (Corporate)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>ProQuest One Psychology</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Psychonomic bulletin & review</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Murphy, Dillon H.</au><au>Huckins, Stephen C.</au><au>Rhodes, Matthew G.</au><au>Castel, Alan D.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>The effect of perceptual processing fluency and value on metacognition and remembering</atitle><jtitle>Psychonomic bulletin & review</jtitle><stitle>Psychon Bull Rev</stitle><addtitle>Psychon Bull Rev</addtitle><date>2022-06-01</date><risdate>2022</risdate><volume>29</volume><issue>3</issue><spage>910</spage><epage>921</epage><pages>910-921</pages><issn>1069-9384</issn><eissn>1531-5320</eissn><abstract>Previous research has indicated that perceptual processing fluency significantly affects metacognitive predictions of performance but not learning outcomes. In the present study, we examined the differential impact of perceptual processing fluency and an item’s value on metacognition and recall. We presented participants with words visually and audibly, with each word paired with a point value counting towards participants’ scores if recalled. The words were either highly perceptually fluent (large font, loud volume) or less perceptually fluent (small font, low volume). Results revealed that both metacognitive monitoring (JOLs) and recall were sensitive to perceptual processing fluency as well as value, but the magnitude of the effect of value was significantly greater than that of font size. Specifically, high-value words were better remembered than low-value words, regardless of fluency, and participants’ judgments mapped onto their selectivity for valuable information. Thus, the current study revealed the differential effects of intrinsic and extrinsic cues on metacognitive monitoring and later remembering such that the cues that can influence monitoring in certain encoding conditions become less impactful when pitted against other intrinsic cues in different encoding conditions.</abstract><cop>New York</cop><pub>Springer US</pub><pmid>34846689</pmid><doi>10.3758/s13423-021-02030-8</doi><tpages>12</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5604-3494</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1965-8227</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
| fulltext | fulltext |
| identifier | ISSN: 1069-9384 |
| ispartof | Psychonomic bulletin & review, 2022-06, Vol.29 (3), p.910-921 |
| issn | 1069-9384 1531-5320 |
| language | eng |
| recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2604832450 |
| source | MEDLINE; Springer Nature - Complete Springer Journals; Elektronische Zeitschriftenbibliothek - Frei zugängliche E-Journals |
| subjects | Behavioral Science and Psychology Brief Report Cognitive Psychology Cues Humans Judgment Learning Mental Recall Metacognition Psychology |
| title | The effect of perceptual processing fluency and value on metacognition and remembering |
| url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-30T22%3A32%3A03IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=The%20effect%20of%20perceptual%20processing%20fluency%20and%20value%20on%20metacognition%20and%20remembering&rft.jtitle=Psychonomic%20bulletin%20&%20review&rft.au=Murphy,%20Dillon%20H.&rft.date=2022-06-01&rft.volume=29&rft.issue=3&rft.spage=910&rft.epage=921&rft.pages=910-921&rft.issn=1069-9384&rft.eissn=1531-5320&rft_id=info:doi/10.3758/s13423-021-02030-8&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2674462532%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2674462532&rft_id=info:pmid/34846689&rfr_iscdi=true |