Direct contact membrane distillation as an approach for water treatment with phenolic compounds

Membrane distillation is a well-established technology for non-volatile components retention, but the removal of volatile and semi-volatile substances in trace concentration, such as phenols derivates commonly found in surface waters, requires further comprehension. In this context, the direct conta...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Journal of environmental management 2022-02, Vol.303, p.114117-114117, Article 114117
Hauptverfasser: Ramos, Ramatisa L., Lebron, Yuri A.R., Moreira, Victor R., Martins, Mateus F., Santos, Lucilaine V.S., Amaral, Miriam C.S.
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 114117
container_issue
container_start_page 114117
container_title Journal of environmental management
container_volume 303
creator Ramos, Ramatisa L.
Lebron, Yuri A.R.
Moreira, Victor R.
Martins, Mateus F.
Santos, Lucilaine V.S.
Amaral, Miriam C.S.
description Membrane distillation is a well-established technology for non-volatile components retention, but the removal of volatile and semi-volatile substances in trace concentration, such as phenols derivates commonly found in surface waters, requires further comprehension. In this context, the direct contact membrane distillation (DCMD) performance was assessed for the retention of fifteen phenolic compounds in surface water by different operating conditions of temperature (40, 50, and 60 °C), feed concentration (3, 5, 7, and 10 μg L−1), and permeate recovery rate (30, 50 and 70%). Kruskal Wallis confirmed a significant difference (p 
doi_str_mv 10.1016/j.jenvman.2021.114117
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2604458642</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S0301479721021794</els_id><sourcerecordid>2604458642</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c365t-af13f1afe6db687d4641adf4469f8058aa89ba29f93d4cd37ee7721f31254e983</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFkE-PEzEMxSMEYsvCRwDlyGVKPMlkZk4I7fJPWokLnCM3cdRUnWRI0l3x7cnSwhVZsi_P79k_xl6D2IIA_e6wPVC8XzBue9HDFkABjE_YBsQ8dJOW4inbCCmgU-M8XrEXpRyEELKH8Tm7kmqSrWDDzG3IZCu3KVZsc6FllzESd6HUcDxiDSlyLBxbX9ec0O65T5k_YKXMayasC8XKH0Ld83VPMR2DbXbLmk7RlZfsmcdjoVeXec1-fPr4_eZLd_ft89ebD3edlXqoHXqQHtCTdjs9jU5pBei8Unr2kxgmxGneYT_7WTplnRyJxrEHL6EfFM2TvGZvz77txJ8nKtUsoVhqD0RKp2J6LZQaJq36Jh3OUptTKZm8WXNYMP8yIMwjW3MwF7bmka05s217by4Rp91C7t_WX5hN8P4soPbofaBsig0ULbk_jI1L4T8RvwHHm47C</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2604458642</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Direct contact membrane distillation as an approach for water treatment with phenolic compounds</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals</source><creator>Ramos, Ramatisa L. ; Lebron, Yuri A.R. ; Moreira, Victor R. ; Martins, Mateus F. ; Santos, Lucilaine V.S. ; Amaral, Miriam C.S.</creator><creatorcontrib>Ramos, Ramatisa L. ; Lebron, Yuri A.R. ; Moreira, Victor R. ; Martins, Mateus F. ; Santos, Lucilaine V.S. ; Amaral, Miriam C.S.</creatorcontrib><description>Membrane distillation is a well-established technology for non-volatile components retention, but the removal of volatile and semi-volatile substances in trace concentration, such as phenols derivates commonly found in surface waters, requires further comprehension. In this context, the direct contact membrane distillation (DCMD) performance was assessed for the retention of fifteen phenolic compounds in surface water by different operating conditions of temperature (40, 50, and 60 °C), feed concentration (3, 5, 7, and 10 μg L−1), and permeate recovery rate (30, 50 and 70%). Kruskal Wallis confirmed a significant difference (p &lt; 0.05) between the global removal of phenolic compounds at different temperatures. The increase in temperature led to a reduction in all compound's removal. As expected, a positive correlation (rSpearman&gt;0.8) between the compounds' volatility and their losses was observed. Regarding the feed concentration and the recovery rate, there was no statistical difference between the removal values obtained for the phenolic compounds. This indicates the DCMD strength for that application. However, a trend for flux decay was noticed as the recovery rate (RR) increased, confirmed by temporal trend analysis and Mann-Kendall tests, although the flux decay was relatively low (J/J0 = 0.89). Aiming for a greater removal and to avoid a reduction in process performance, it is recommended to work with 40 °C as feed temperature and a RR prior to the flux decay (RR&lt;30%). Nonetheless, the technology was efficient and did not compromise the permeate quality with &gt;90% efficiency in pollutants removal, even for higher temperatures and RR. [Display omitted] •Compound's volatility contribute more to the process efficiency than the hydrophobicity.•The pollutants were removed with &gt;90% efficiency at 60 °C.•Compound's hydrophobicity wasn't statistically significant with the system losses.•The permeate recovery rate achieved didn't affect the pollutants' removal.•Membrane distillation was indicated for phenols removal in trace concentrations.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0301-4797</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1095-8630</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.jenvman.2021.114117</identifier><identifier>PMID: 34838381</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>England: Elsevier Ltd</publisher><subject>Distillation ; Membrane distillation performance ; Membranes ; Membranes, Artificial ; Phenolic compounds ; Phenols ; Temperature ; Water Purification ; Water treatment</subject><ispartof>Journal of environmental management, 2022-02, Vol.303, p.114117-114117, Article 114117</ispartof><rights>2021 Elsevier Ltd</rights><rights>Copyright © 2021 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c365t-af13f1afe6db687d4641adf4469f8058aa89ba29f93d4cd37ee7721f31254e983</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c365t-af13f1afe6db687d4641adf4469f8058aa89ba29f93d4cd37ee7721f31254e983</cites><orcidid>0000-0003-2138-8799 ; 0000-0001-6368-3310 ; 0000-0001-8294-8476 ; 0000-0001-9002-3297 ; 0000-0001-6933-8454</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0301479721021794$$EHTML$$P50$$Gelsevier$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,3537,27901,27902,65306</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34838381$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Ramos, Ramatisa L.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lebron, Yuri A.R.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Moreira, Victor R.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Martins, Mateus F.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Santos, Lucilaine V.S.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Amaral, Miriam C.S.</creatorcontrib><title>Direct contact membrane distillation as an approach for water treatment with phenolic compounds</title><title>Journal of environmental management</title><addtitle>J Environ Manage</addtitle><description>Membrane distillation is a well-established technology for non-volatile components retention, but the removal of volatile and semi-volatile substances in trace concentration, such as phenols derivates commonly found in surface waters, requires further comprehension. In this context, the direct contact membrane distillation (DCMD) performance was assessed for the retention of fifteen phenolic compounds in surface water by different operating conditions of temperature (40, 50, and 60 °C), feed concentration (3, 5, 7, and 10 μg L−1), and permeate recovery rate (30, 50 and 70%). Kruskal Wallis confirmed a significant difference (p &lt; 0.05) between the global removal of phenolic compounds at different temperatures. The increase in temperature led to a reduction in all compound's removal. As expected, a positive correlation (rSpearman&gt;0.8) between the compounds' volatility and their losses was observed. Regarding the feed concentration and the recovery rate, there was no statistical difference between the removal values obtained for the phenolic compounds. This indicates the DCMD strength for that application. However, a trend for flux decay was noticed as the recovery rate (RR) increased, confirmed by temporal trend analysis and Mann-Kendall tests, although the flux decay was relatively low (J/J0 = 0.89). Aiming for a greater removal and to avoid a reduction in process performance, it is recommended to work with 40 °C as feed temperature and a RR prior to the flux decay (RR&lt;30%). Nonetheless, the technology was efficient and did not compromise the permeate quality with &gt;90% efficiency in pollutants removal, even for higher temperatures and RR. [Display omitted] •Compound's volatility contribute more to the process efficiency than the hydrophobicity.•The pollutants were removed with &gt;90% efficiency at 60 °C.•Compound's hydrophobicity wasn't statistically significant with the system losses.•The permeate recovery rate achieved didn't affect the pollutants' removal.•Membrane distillation was indicated for phenols removal in trace concentrations.</description><subject>Distillation</subject><subject>Membrane distillation performance</subject><subject>Membranes</subject><subject>Membranes, Artificial</subject><subject>Phenolic compounds</subject><subject>Phenols</subject><subject>Temperature</subject><subject>Water Purification</subject><subject>Water treatment</subject><issn>0301-4797</issn><issn>1095-8630</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2022</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNqFkE-PEzEMxSMEYsvCRwDlyGVKPMlkZk4I7fJPWokLnCM3cdRUnWRI0l3x7cnSwhVZsi_P79k_xl6D2IIA_e6wPVC8XzBue9HDFkABjE_YBsQ8dJOW4inbCCmgU-M8XrEXpRyEELKH8Tm7kmqSrWDDzG3IZCu3KVZsc6FllzESd6HUcDxiDSlyLBxbX9ec0O65T5k_YKXMayasC8XKH0Ld83VPMR2DbXbLmk7RlZfsmcdjoVeXec1-fPr4_eZLd_ft89ebD3edlXqoHXqQHtCTdjs9jU5pBei8Unr2kxgmxGneYT_7WTplnRyJxrEHL6EfFM2TvGZvz77txJ8nKtUsoVhqD0RKp2J6LZQaJq36Jh3OUptTKZm8WXNYMP8yIMwjW3MwF7bmka05s217by4Rp91C7t_WX5hN8P4soPbofaBsig0ULbk_jI1L4T8RvwHHm47C</recordid><startdate>20220201</startdate><enddate>20220201</enddate><creator>Ramos, Ramatisa L.</creator><creator>Lebron, Yuri A.R.</creator><creator>Moreira, Victor R.</creator><creator>Martins, Mateus F.</creator><creator>Santos, Lucilaine V.S.</creator><creator>Amaral, Miriam C.S.</creator><general>Elsevier Ltd</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2138-8799</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6368-3310</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8294-8476</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9002-3297</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6933-8454</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20220201</creationdate><title>Direct contact membrane distillation as an approach for water treatment with phenolic compounds</title><author>Ramos, Ramatisa L. ; Lebron, Yuri A.R. ; Moreira, Victor R. ; Martins, Mateus F. ; Santos, Lucilaine V.S. ; Amaral, Miriam C.S.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c365t-af13f1afe6db687d4641adf4469f8058aa89ba29f93d4cd37ee7721f31254e983</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2022</creationdate><topic>Distillation</topic><topic>Membrane distillation performance</topic><topic>Membranes</topic><topic>Membranes, Artificial</topic><topic>Phenolic compounds</topic><topic>Phenols</topic><topic>Temperature</topic><topic>Water Purification</topic><topic>Water treatment</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Ramos, Ramatisa L.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lebron, Yuri A.R.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Moreira, Victor R.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Martins, Mateus F.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Santos, Lucilaine V.S.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Amaral, Miriam C.S.</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Journal of environmental management</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Ramos, Ramatisa L.</au><au>Lebron, Yuri A.R.</au><au>Moreira, Victor R.</au><au>Martins, Mateus F.</au><au>Santos, Lucilaine V.S.</au><au>Amaral, Miriam C.S.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Direct contact membrane distillation as an approach for water treatment with phenolic compounds</atitle><jtitle>Journal of environmental management</jtitle><addtitle>J Environ Manage</addtitle><date>2022-02-01</date><risdate>2022</risdate><volume>303</volume><spage>114117</spage><epage>114117</epage><pages>114117-114117</pages><artnum>114117</artnum><issn>0301-4797</issn><eissn>1095-8630</eissn><abstract>Membrane distillation is a well-established technology for non-volatile components retention, but the removal of volatile and semi-volatile substances in trace concentration, such as phenols derivates commonly found in surface waters, requires further comprehension. In this context, the direct contact membrane distillation (DCMD) performance was assessed for the retention of fifteen phenolic compounds in surface water by different operating conditions of temperature (40, 50, and 60 °C), feed concentration (3, 5, 7, and 10 μg L−1), and permeate recovery rate (30, 50 and 70%). Kruskal Wallis confirmed a significant difference (p &lt; 0.05) between the global removal of phenolic compounds at different temperatures. The increase in temperature led to a reduction in all compound's removal. As expected, a positive correlation (rSpearman&gt;0.8) between the compounds' volatility and their losses was observed. Regarding the feed concentration and the recovery rate, there was no statistical difference between the removal values obtained for the phenolic compounds. This indicates the DCMD strength for that application. However, a trend for flux decay was noticed as the recovery rate (RR) increased, confirmed by temporal trend analysis and Mann-Kendall tests, although the flux decay was relatively low (J/J0 = 0.89). Aiming for a greater removal and to avoid a reduction in process performance, it is recommended to work with 40 °C as feed temperature and a RR prior to the flux decay (RR&lt;30%). Nonetheless, the technology was efficient and did not compromise the permeate quality with &gt;90% efficiency in pollutants removal, even for higher temperatures and RR. [Display omitted] •Compound's volatility contribute more to the process efficiency than the hydrophobicity.•The pollutants were removed with &gt;90% efficiency at 60 °C.•Compound's hydrophobicity wasn't statistically significant with the system losses.•The permeate recovery rate achieved didn't affect the pollutants' removal.•Membrane distillation was indicated for phenols removal in trace concentrations.</abstract><cop>England</cop><pub>Elsevier Ltd</pub><pmid>34838381</pmid><doi>10.1016/j.jenvman.2021.114117</doi><tpages>1</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2138-8799</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6368-3310</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8294-8476</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9002-3297</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6933-8454</orcidid></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0301-4797
ispartof Journal of environmental management, 2022-02, Vol.303, p.114117-114117, Article 114117
issn 0301-4797
1095-8630
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2604458642
source MEDLINE; Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals
subjects Distillation
Membrane distillation performance
Membranes
Membranes, Artificial
Phenolic compounds
Phenols
Temperature
Water Purification
Water treatment
title Direct contact membrane distillation as an approach for water treatment with phenolic compounds
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-08T18%3A07%3A59IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Direct%20contact%20membrane%20distillation%20as%20an%20approach%20for%20water%20treatment%20with%20phenolic%20compounds&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20environmental%20management&rft.au=Ramos,%20Ramatisa%20L.&rft.date=2022-02-01&rft.volume=303&rft.spage=114117&rft.epage=114117&rft.pages=114117-114117&rft.artnum=114117&rft.issn=0301-4797&rft.eissn=1095-8630&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.jenvman.2021.114117&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2604458642%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2604458642&rft_id=info:pmid/34838381&rft_els_id=S0301479721021794&rfr_iscdi=true