Direct contact membrane distillation as an approach for water treatment with phenolic compounds
Membrane distillation is a well-established technology for non-volatile components retention, but the removal of volatile and semi-volatile substances in trace concentration, such as phenols derivates commonly found in surface waters, requires further comprehension. In this context, the direct conta...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Journal of environmental management 2022-02, Vol.303, p.114117-114117, Article 114117 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 114117 |
---|---|
container_issue | |
container_start_page | 114117 |
container_title | Journal of environmental management |
container_volume | 303 |
creator | Ramos, Ramatisa L. Lebron, Yuri A.R. Moreira, Victor R. Martins, Mateus F. Santos, Lucilaine V.S. Amaral, Miriam C.S. |
description | Membrane distillation is a well-established technology for non-volatile components retention, but the removal of volatile and semi-volatile substances in trace concentration, such as phenols derivates commonly found in surface waters, requires further comprehension. In this context, the direct contact membrane distillation (DCMD) performance was assessed for the retention of fifteen phenolic compounds in surface water by different operating conditions of temperature (40, 50, and 60 °C), feed concentration (3, 5, 7, and 10 μg L−1), and permeate recovery rate (30, 50 and 70%). Kruskal Wallis confirmed a significant difference (p |
doi_str_mv | 10.1016/j.jenvman.2021.114117 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2604458642</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S0301479721021794</els_id><sourcerecordid>2604458642</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c365t-af13f1afe6db687d4641adf4469f8058aa89ba29f93d4cd37ee7721f31254e983</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFkE-PEzEMxSMEYsvCRwDlyGVKPMlkZk4I7fJPWokLnCM3cdRUnWRI0l3x7cnSwhVZsi_P79k_xl6D2IIA_e6wPVC8XzBue9HDFkABjE_YBsQ8dJOW4inbCCmgU-M8XrEXpRyEELKH8Tm7kmqSrWDDzG3IZCu3KVZsc6FllzESd6HUcDxiDSlyLBxbX9ec0O65T5k_YKXMayasC8XKH0Ld83VPMR2DbXbLmk7RlZfsmcdjoVeXec1-fPr4_eZLd_ft89ebD3edlXqoHXqQHtCTdjs9jU5pBei8Unr2kxgmxGneYT_7WTplnRyJxrEHL6EfFM2TvGZvz77txJ8nKtUsoVhqD0RKp2J6LZQaJq36Jh3OUptTKZm8WXNYMP8yIMwjW3MwF7bmka05s217by4Rp91C7t_WX5hN8P4soPbofaBsig0ULbk_jI1L4T8RvwHHm47C</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2604458642</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Direct contact membrane distillation as an approach for water treatment with phenolic compounds</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals</source><creator>Ramos, Ramatisa L. ; Lebron, Yuri A.R. ; Moreira, Victor R. ; Martins, Mateus F. ; Santos, Lucilaine V.S. ; Amaral, Miriam C.S.</creator><creatorcontrib>Ramos, Ramatisa L. ; Lebron, Yuri A.R. ; Moreira, Victor R. ; Martins, Mateus F. ; Santos, Lucilaine V.S. ; Amaral, Miriam C.S.</creatorcontrib><description>Membrane distillation is a well-established technology for non-volatile components retention, but the removal of volatile and semi-volatile substances in trace concentration, such as phenols derivates commonly found in surface waters, requires further comprehension. In this context, the direct contact membrane distillation (DCMD) performance was assessed for the retention of fifteen phenolic compounds in surface water by different operating conditions of temperature (40, 50, and 60 °C), feed concentration (3, 5, 7, and 10 μg L−1), and permeate recovery rate (30, 50 and 70%). Kruskal Wallis confirmed a significant difference (p < 0.05) between the global removal of phenolic compounds at different temperatures. The increase in temperature led to a reduction in all compound's removal. As expected, a positive correlation (rSpearman>0.8) between the compounds' volatility and their losses was observed. Regarding the feed concentration and the recovery rate, there was no statistical difference between the removal values obtained for the phenolic compounds. This indicates the DCMD strength for that application. However, a trend for flux decay was noticed as the recovery rate (RR) increased, confirmed by temporal trend analysis and Mann-Kendall tests, although the flux decay was relatively low (J/J0 = 0.89). Aiming for a greater removal and to avoid a reduction in process performance, it is recommended to work with 40 °C as feed temperature and a RR prior to the flux decay (RR<30%). Nonetheless, the technology was efficient and did not compromise the permeate quality with >90% efficiency in pollutants removal, even for higher temperatures and RR.
[Display omitted]
•Compound's volatility contribute more to the process efficiency than the hydrophobicity.•The pollutants were removed with >90% efficiency at 60 °C.•Compound's hydrophobicity wasn't statistically significant with the system losses.•The permeate recovery rate achieved didn't affect the pollutants' removal.•Membrane distillation was indicated for phenols removal in trace concentrations.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0301-4797</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1095-8630</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.jenvman.2021.114117</identifier><identifier>PMID: 34838381</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>England: Elsevier Ltd</publisher><subject>Distillation ; Membrane distillation performance ; Membranes ; Membranes, Artificial ; Phenolic compounds ; Phenols ; Temperature ; Water Purification ; Water treatment</subject><ispartof>Journal of environmental management, 2022-02, Vol.303, p.114117-114117, Article 114117</ispartof><rights>2021 Elsevier Ltd</rights><rights>Copyright © 2021 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c365t-af13f1afe6db687d4641adf4469f8058aa89ba29f93d4cd37ee7721f31254e983</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c365t-af13f1afe6db687d4641adf4469f8058aa89ba29f93d4cd37ee7721f31254e983</cites><orcidid>0000-0003-2138-8799 ; 0000-0001-6368-3310 ; 0000-0001-8294-8476 ; 0000-0001-9002-3297 ; 0000-0001-6933-8454</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0301479721021794$$EHTML$$P50$$Gelsevier$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,3537,27901,27902,65306</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34838381$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Ramos, Ramatisa L.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lebron, Yuri A.R.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Moreira, Victor R.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Martins, Mateus F.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Santos, Lucilaine V.S.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Amaral, Miriam C.S.</creatorcontrib><title>Direct contact membrane distillation as an approach for water treatment with phenolic compounds</title><title>Journal of environmental management</title><addtitle>J Environ Manage</addtitle><description>Membrane distillation is a well-established technology for non-volatile components retention, but the removal of volatile and semi-volatile substances in trace concentration, such as phenols derivates commonly found in surface waters, requires further comprehension. In this context, the direct contact membrane distillation (DCMD) performance was assessed for the retention of fifteen phenolic compounds in surface water by different operating conditions of temperature (40, 50, and 60 °C), feed concentration (3, 5, 7, and 10 μg L−1), and permeate recovery rate (30, 50 and 70%). Kruskal Wallis confirmed a significant difference (p < 0.05) between the global removal of phenolic compounds at different temperatures. The increase in temperature led to a reduction in all compound's removal. As expected, a positive correlation (rSpearman>0.8) between the compounds' volatility and their losses was observed. Regarding the feed concentration and the recovery rate, there was no statistical difference between the removal values obtained for the phenolic compounds. This indicates the DCMD strength for that application. However, a trend for flux decay was noticed as the recovery rate (RR) increased, confirmed by temporal trend analysis and Mann-Kendall tests, although the flux decay was relatively low (J/J0 = 0.89). Aiming for a greater removal and to avoid a reduction in process performance, it is recommended to work with 40 °C as feed temperature and a RR prior to the flux decay (RR<30%). Nonetheless, the technology was efficient and did not compromise the permeate quality with >90% efficiency in pollutants removal, even for higher temperatures and RR.
[Display omitted]
•Compound's volatility contribute more to the process efficiency than the hydrophobicity.•The pollutants were removed with >90% efficiency at 60 °C.•Compound's hydrophobicity wasn't statistically significant with the system losses.•The permeate recovery rate achieved didn't affect the pollutants' removal.•Membrane distillation was indicated for phenols removal in trace concentrations.</description><subject>Distillation</subject><subject>Membrane distillation performance</subject><subject>Membranes</subject><subject>Membranes, Artificial</subject><subject>Phenolic compounds</subject><subject>Phenols</subject><subject>Temperature</subject><subject>Water Purification</subject><subject>Water treatment</subject><issn>0301-4797</issn><issn>1095-8630</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2022</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNqFkE-PEzEMxSMEYsvCRwDlyGVKPMlkZk4I7fJPWokLnCM3cdRUnWRI0l3x7cnSwhVZsi_P79k_xl6D2IIA_e6wPVC8XzBue9HDFkABjE_YBsQ8dJOW4inbCCmgU-M8XrEXpRyEELKH8Tm7kmqSrWDDzG3IZCu3KVZsc6FllzESd6HUcDxiDSlyLBxbX9ec0O65T5k_YKXMayasC8XKH0Ld83VPMR2DbXbLmk7RlZfsmcdjoVeXec1-fPr4_eZLd_ft89ebD3edlXqoHXqQHtCTdjs9jU5pBei8Unr2kxgmxGneYT_7WTplnRyJxrEHL6EfFM2TvGZvz77txJ8nKtUsoVhqD0RKp2J6LZQaJq36Jh3OUptTKZm8WXNYMP8yIMwjW3MwF7bmka05s217by4Rp91C7t_WX5hN8P4soPbofaBsig0ULbk_jI1L4T8RvwHHm47C</recordid><startdate>20220201</startdate><enddate>20220201</enddate><creator>Ramos, Ramatisa L.</creator><creator>Lebron, Yuri A.R.</creator><creator>Moreira, Victor R.</creator><creator>Martins, Mateus F.</creator><creator>Santos, Lucilaine V.S.</creator><creator>Amaral, Miriam C.S.</creator><general>Elsevier Ltd</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2138-8799</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6368-3310</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8294-8476</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9002-3297</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6933-8454</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20220201</creationdate><title>Direct contact membrane distillation as an approach for water treatment with phenolic compounds</title><author>Ramos, Ramatisa L. ; Lebron, Yuri A.R. ; Moreira, Victor R. ; Martins, Mateus F. ; Santos, Lucilaine V.S. ; Amaral, Miriam C.S.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c365t-af13f1afe6db687d4641adf4469f8058aa89ba29f93d4cd37ee7721f31254e983</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2022</creationdate><topic>Distillation</topic><topic>Membrane distillation performance</topic><topic>Membranes</topic><topic>Membranes, Artificial</topic><topic>Phenolic compounds</topic><topic>Phenols</topic><topic>Temperature</topic><topic>Water Purification</topic><topic>Water treatment</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Ramos, Ramatisa L.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lebron, Yuri A.R.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Moreira, Victor R.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Martins, Mateus F.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Santos, Lucilaine V.S.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Amaral, Miriam C.S.</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Journal of environmental management</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Ramos, Ramatisa L.</au><au>Lebron, Yuri A.R.</au><au>Moreira, Victor R.</au><au>Martins, Mateus F.</au><au>Santos, Lucilaine V.S.</au><au>Amaral, Miriam C.S.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Direct contact membrane distillation as an approach for water treatment with phenolic compounds</atitle><jtitle>Journal of environmental management</jtitle><addtitle>J Environ Manage</addtitle><date>2022-02-01</date><risdate>2022</risdate><volume>303</volume><spage>114117</spage><epage>114117</epage><pages>114117-114117</pages><artnum>114117</artnum><issn>0301-4797</issn><eissn>1095-8630</eissn><abstract>Membrane distillation is a well-established technology for non-volatile components retention, but the removal of volatile and semi-volatile substances in trace concentration, such as phenols derivates commonly found in surface waters, requires further comprehension. In this context, the direct contact membrane distillation (DCMD) performance was assessed for the retention of fifteen phenolic compounds in surface water by different operating conditions of temperature (40, 50, and 60 °C), feed concentration (3, 5, 7, and 10 μg L−1), and permeate recovery rate (30, 50 and 70%). Kruskal Wallis confirmed a significant difference (p < 0.05) between the global removal of phenolic compounds at different temperatures. The increase in temperature led to a reduction in all compound's removal. As expected, a positive correlation (rSpearman>0.8) between the compounds' volatility and their losses was observed. Regarding the feed concentration and the recovery rate, there was no statistical difference between the removal values obtained for the phenolic compounds. This indicates the DCMD strength for that application. However, a trend for flux decay was noticed as the recovery rate (RR) increased, confirmed by temporal trend analysis and Mann-Kendall tests, although the flux decay was relatively low (J/J0 = 0.89). Aiming for a greater removal and to avoid a reduction in process performance, it is recommended to work with 40 °C as feed temperature and a RR prior to the flux decay (RR<30%). Nonetheless, the technology was efficient and did not compromise the permeate quality with >90% efficiency in pollutants removal, even for higher temperatures and RR.
[Display omitted]
•Compound's volatility contribute more to the process efficiency than the hydrophobicity.•The pollutants were removed with >90% efficiency at 60 °C.•Compound's hydrophobicity wasn't statistically significant with the system losses.•The permeate recovery rate achieved didn't affect the pollutants' removal.•Membrane distillation was indicated for phenols removal in trace concentrations.</abstract><cop>England</cop><pub>Elsevier Ltd</pub><pmid>34838381</pmid><doi>10.1016/j.jenvman.2021.114117</doi><tpages>1</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2138-8799</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6368-3310</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8294-8476</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9002-3297</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6933-8454</orcidid></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0301-4797 |
ispartof | Journal of environmental management, 2022-02, Vol.303, p.114117-114117, Article 114117 |
issn | 0301-4797 1095-8630 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2604458642 |
source | MEDLINE; Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals |
subjects | Distillation Membrane distillation performance Membranes Membranes, Artificial Phenolic compounds Phenols Temperature Water Purification Water treatment |
title | Direct contact membrane distillation as an approach for water treatment with phenolic compounds |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-08T18%3A07%3A59IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Direct%20contact%20membrane%20distillation%20as%20an%20approach%20for%20water%20treatment%20with%20phenolic%20compounds&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20environmental%20management&rft.au=Ramos,%20Ramatisa%20L.&rft.date=2022-02-01&rft.volume=303&rft.spage=114117&rft.epage=114117&rft.pages=114117-114117&rft.artnum=114117&rft.issn=0301-4797&rft.eissn=1095-8630&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.jenvman.2021.114117&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2604458642%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2604458642&rft_id=info:pmid/34838381&rft_els_id=S0301479721021794&rfr_iscdi=true |